Spy scandal for the National Security Agency will not terminate the eloquence of Obama
Center for American Studies and Arabic continue with the Washington
office of the "fields" to focus on the important issues in the United
States, Vmdiat spy for the National Security Agency to unfold
sequentially, without forming a comprehensive picture around. The eloquence of the U.S. president will not Tndja to terminate the case.
"Obama's rhetorical eloquence" will not end the scandal of spying for the National Security Agency
President Obama went to spend a few days of annual leave, accumulated
Flahakth repercussions of scandals that were not taken into account,
which urged him to hold a press conference before leaving the White
House anticipates the accumulation of criticism of the government on the
issues of espionage and internal monitoring.
Deep down, it was not Obama intends to address the issue details, even
if superficial, but to distort Alonzaran violations of state civil
rights, categorically promise the formation of an independent
investigative body founded on professionals and experts to find out what
led him espionage efforts and make recommendations to fortify media
monitoring intelligence against measures restricting freedom of
movement.
And also promises to review its electoral base rhetorical eloquence,
Obama began distancing self and denied to take responsibility for what
is happening and addresses issues of embarrassing.
But claimed in his brief that he expressed "doubts constructive" about
the programs and the National Security Agency during his service in the
Senate.
And deliberately ignored to address the measures it has taken to
develop mechanisms that govern the work of the agency since he assumed
the presidential post.
Spyware ranges that have gone forth and the National Security Agency to unfold sequentially, without forming a comprehensive picture around. In this regard, the newspaper "Washington Post" on August 16 / August, which, for non-compliance with the IAEA legal controls painted landmarks secret court to spy on the outer authorized to do so, but I broke the agency of those rules, "many thousands of times every year since 2008, most of the violations included the illegal surveillance of American citizens or objectives of foreign intelligence within the United States, has led to some unintentional interception of emails and phone calls to citizens. "
Needless to say, that official measures announced to contain the crisis is shrouded in mystery: the oldest Obama on the amendments to Article 215 of the Law "Patriot" to put the controls for the procedures the agency in obtaining data telephone records, which does not affect the essence of the matter especially since the above-mentioned article came as a modification Article 501 of the Law on Control and foreign espionage. Obama and avoid entering into any detail of the amendments or capping the framework of desired reform. Nutshell, the Obama threw to soothe the feelings of discontent across the structure to give the impression of reform.
It is worth mentioning that the law of foreign espionage and surveillance, FISA, overseen by a special judicial body appointed by the executive branch, and Alcharor with the legislative authority, to decide on the issues of the nature of security do not go to ordinary courts in order to preserve the confidentiality of its proceedings. And usually, but in all cases, based on the body mentioned in issuing rulings to hear the perspective of the state exclusively and exclusion of other views, which prompted one of its members, former Judge James Robertson, who served under which from 2002 to 2005, to issue a statement clearly defined In his criticism of the mechanism of action of the court recently, saying "there is a lack inherent in the work of this court that you enjoy the view of the single is the government before making its decision confidentially to issue a court order to justify to its performing procedures inspection and observer. although both served as a judge will confirm that the judges they should listen to the points of view before the sentencing, the judge's role is a trade-off between two disputing parties. " In this regard, President Obama expressed his desire to represent all points of view before the court secrecy constrained by law as drafted.
The Judge Robertson resigned from the membership of the secret court in 2005, after detecting the New York Times about the existence of the program of eavesdropping wide run by the National Security Agency does not require obtaining a court order to target individual Americans, and which went into effect immediately after the attacks of September 11 / September 2001.
Spyware ranges that have gone forth and the National Security Agency to unfold sequentially, without forming a comprehensive picture around. In this regard, the newspaper "Washington Post" on August 16 / August, which, for non-compliance with the IAEA legal controls painted landmarks secret court to spy on the outer authorized to do so, but I broke the agency of those rules, "many thousands of times every year since 2008, most of the violations included the illegal surveillance of American citizens or objectives of foreign intelligence within the United States, has led to some unintentional interception of emails and phone calls to citizens. "
Needless to say, that official measures announced to contain the crisis is shrouded in mystery: the oldest Obama on the amendments to Article 215 of the Law "Patriot" to put the controls for the procedures the agency in obtaining data telephone records, which does not affect the essence of the matter especially since the above-mentioned article came as a modification Article 501 of the Law on Control and foreign espionage. Obama and avoid entering into any detail of the amendments or capping the framework of desired reform. Nutshell, the Obama threw to soothe the feelings of discontent across the structure to give the impression of reform.
It is worth mentioning that the law of foreign espionage and surveillance, FISA, overseen by a special judicial body appointed by the executive branch, and Alcharor with the legislative authority, to decide on the issues of the nature of security do not go to ordinary courts in order to preserve the confidentiality of its proceedings. And usually, but in all cases, based on the body mentioned in issuing rulings to hear the perspective of the state exclusively and exclusion of other views, which prompted one of its members, former Judge James Robertson, who served under which from 2002 to 2005, to issue a statement clearly defined In his criticism of the mechanism of action of the court recently, saying "there is a lack inherent in the work of this court that you enjoy the view of the single is the government before making its decision confidentially to issue a court order to justify to its performing procedures inspection and observer. although both served as a judge will confirm that the judges they should listen to the points of view before the sentencing, the judge's role is a trade-off between two disputing parties. " In this regard, President Obama expressed his desire to represent all points of view before the court secrecy constrained by law as drafted.
The Judge Robertson resigned from the membership of the secret court in 2005, after detecting the New York Times about the existence of the program of eavesdropping wide run by the National Security Agency does not require obtaining a court order to target individual Americans, and which went into effect immediately after the attacks of September 11 / September 2001.
And President Obama announced last week his intention to form an
independent body for the National Security Agency to study and make
recommendations about U.S. efforts to accumulate intelligence across the
world, headed by IAEA Director James Clapper, who approved the exercise
of deception and lying in front of the Intelligence Committee in the
U.S. House of Representatives recently.
Any the agency to oversee all efforts involving phone records and
e-mails and all that it entails web of capabilities and possibilities.
But Obama's announcement was disappointing to reforms, especially as he threw to set an eye on the implications of the leaks and the efforts of anti-spyware instead of addressing the issue of constitutional violations that are made through fishing nets and the National Security Agency. Remarkably, in the announcement by President Obama selected tasks body problem of "outside experts" security establishment "to oversee the mechanisms necessary to maintain the level of public confidence, and how Tiguenna assertion that he would not be a misuse of those powers in relation to the techniques of intelligence used, and ask questions about the implications of monitoring efforts on our foreign policy, especially in light of the era in which information has become accessible to the public. "
And hard that President Obama is not considered that the issue of the National Security Agency worthwhile cause. She summarized the newspaper "Washington Post" directed President Obama as "seeking to stir up noise rather than a genuine interest in something significant," a novel by the Minister of Education Arne Duncan told the newspaper.
According to the statements of President Obama, on August 9 / Agchtts this, saying "the truth of what I have said that the programs (spyware) managed in a way to prevent abuses, they are still valid .. The question is how I can provide further assurance to the American people"?
But Obama's announcement was disappointing to reforms, especially as he threw to set an eye on the implications of the leaks and the efforts of anti-spyware instead of addressing the issue of constitutional violations that are made through fishing nets and the National Security Agency. Remarkably, in the announcement by President Obama selected tasks body problem of "outside experts" security establishment "to oversee the mechanisms necessary to maintain the level of public confidence, and how Tiguenna assertion that he would not be a misuse of those powers in relation to the techniques of intelligence used, and ask questions about the implications of monitoring efforts on our foreign policy, especially in light of the era in which information has become accessible to the public. "
And hard that President Obama is not considered that the issue of the National Security Agency worthwhile cause. She summarized the newspaper "Washington Post" directed President Obama as "seeking to stir up noise rather than a genuine interest in something significant," a novel by the Minister of Education Arne Duncan told the newspaper.
According to the statements of President Obama, on August 9 / Agchtts this, saying "the truth of what I have said that the programs (spyware) managed in a way to prevent abuses, they are still valid .. The question is how I can provide further assurance to the American people"?
Source: Washington Office
No comments:
Post a Comment