Government Documents Link Global Warming to Advanced Military Climate Modification Technology
Government Documents Link Global Warming to Advanced Military Climate Modification Technology
Documents from 1966 reveal the mission of the military and federal agencies to modify the climate
- Al Gore Says the Science of Global Warming is Settled
By
Harold Saive
theintelhub.com
November 29, 2012
It’s unacceptable that the UN/IPCC continue to push CO2 as
the cause for climate change but refuse to acknowledge the military has
been actively engaged in Climate Warming Weapons Technologies for more
than twenty 20 years.
TITLE: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification”
This set of documents from 1966 reveals a network of government
agencies in perpetual and secret collaboration with each other and the
military to Modify the Global climate.
Created by the elitist National Academy of Sciences – decades of an
inter-agency culture of secrecy explains why the issue of covert aerosol
Geoengineering is a taboo topic to be degraded to the status of
“conspiracy theory” by a matrix of complicit bureaucrats at every
opportunity.
This is why your local TV “meteorologist” will rarely make a helpful
comment about an unusual sky filled with persistent jet trails.
TITLE: “The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System”. A 1986 Critique of the 1966 initiative.
This document appears as an anonymous draft intended as a critique of
the US Weather Modification Program that the author characterizes as
hijacked into a military weapons system.
Jules Verne wrote about geoengineering the earth’s
climate in 1889 in a sequel to “From the Earth to the Moon” called “The
Purchase Of The North Pole”.
Verne writes that the Baltimore Gun Club purchased large tracts of the Arctic then used the famous canon from the
earth-to-the-moon to
tilt the Earth’s axis. The goal was to establish a tropical paradise
as a profitable tourist attraction at the North Pole while “improving”
the entire global climate.
If Verne correctly predicted that man would travel from the earth to
the moon, it should be no surprise that he also predicted that a small
group of influential men would consider warming the climate for profit.
Verne could have been inspired by Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler
who proposed diverting warm Atlantic water into the Arctic back in 1877 –
a dozen years before Verne’s “fantastic”story was published.
Warming the Arctic with large-scale Geoengineering projects has been the vision of industrialists for 100 years – and still is.
Remember when People Thought Arctic Warming was a Good Idea?
VILLAGE VOICE: “ Hey, remember when climate change was a swell idea? Coconuts were in the offing.”
“Imaginations ran wild, and The Washington Post envisioned
Manhattan becoming a tropical paradise” … “People would be gathering
oranges off the trees in Central Park, or picking cocoanuts from palms
along the Battery, [and] hunting crocodiles off the Statue of Liberty.”
The prospect sounded so splendid to New Yorkers that Senator
William Calder (1917-1923) tried to get $100,000 appropriated for a
study of the idea. Village Voice
Remember when Scientists Thought Arctic Warming was a Good Idea?
1962 Harry Wexler (March 15, 1911- 1962) was an MIT
graduate and PhD in meteorology. Wexler had been researching the link
connecting chlorine and bromine compounds to the
destruction of the stratospheric ozone layers, but died of a heart attack while on vacation in Woods Hole, Mass.
Wexler had already accepted an invitation to deliver a lecture entitled “
The Climate of Earth and Its Modifications” at the University of Maryland Space Research and Technology Institute.
(Source)
Wexler’s was last in a long line of ambitious proposals to warm the
Arctic. Coincidently, his proposals were made at the same time the
National Academy of Sciences was working to create a
national weather modification program – a direction in which the military had already embarked in 1958.
“Global Warming” initiatives proposed by Wexler:
- To increase the global temperature of the Earth by 1.7°C, “by injecting a cloud of ice crystals into the polar atmosphere by detonating 10 H-bombs in the Arctic Ocean –
the subject of his 1958 article in Science magazine” (Wexler H., 1958,
“Modifying Weather on a Large Scale,” Science, n.s. 128 (Oct. 31, 1958):
1059-1063).
- To diminish the global temperature by 1.2°C could be doable, “bylaunching a ring of dust particles into equatorial orbit, a modification of an earlier Russian proposal to warm the Arctic”.
- To destroy the ozone layer and hence increase abruptly the surface temperature of the Earth, by spraying “several hundred thousand tons of chlorine or bromine” with a stratospheric airplane. Fleming, 2007(a), pp. 56-57; Fleming, 2007(b), “note n° viii” p. 9 & p. 5 (source)
The decision to reverse direction from warming the arctic to cooling the arctic was announced in
1963 -
the year following Wexler’s death when the National Academy of Sciences
Committee on Atmospheric Sciences recommended appointment of a Panel on
Weather & Climate Modification.
pg 2
Prevailing Circumstances following WWII:
- Operation Paperclip (Also
called Operation Overcast) succeeded in recruiting scientists from Nazi
Germany for employment in the US after WW II and led to the formation
of NASA and the ICBM program.
- The National Security Act passed
in 1947 made possible the rise of the military industrial complex and
creation of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA ) to increase
opportunities for scientific experiments to be conducted without public
knowledge or Congressional oversight.
- Post-war advances in science and advanced physics opened up
opportunities to develop concepts of advanced thinkers like Nikola Tesla
that had been waiting on the shelf for over 50 years.
- In 1958, military application of Tesla’s little known methods of
electromagnetic manipulation of earth’s atmosphere was already
underway. White House advisor on weather modification to President
Eisenhower reported the DoD was studying ways to manipulate electrical
charges of the earth and sky in order to manipulate the weather for
purposes of national defense.
- The rise of an informed and educated middle class looked down on
proposals that employed nuclear detonations that became regarded as
dangerous and arrogant. This is not to say that proposals to mediate the
arctic climate were totally abandoned.
If warming the arctic was regarded as good for commerce for 100
years why would a discovery that found carbon dioxide was already
performing the task for free, suddenly be regarded as a catastrophe to
prevent?
The
BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico demonstrates how Big Oil exists in a
world of opportunistic pragmatism, no matter the risk to the
environment.
With an established record of corporate sociopathy, Big Oil would
have little interest in what event would cause arctic ice to retreat as
long as their long-held dream of new arctic navigation routes and access
to previously ice-locked oil and gas reserves was realized.
It could make marginal difference if the arctic temperatures rise due
to (1) rising CO2 levels or (2) covert arctic climate manipulation.
This timeline of determined Geoengineering projects suggests
the goal of mediating arctic climate remains a favorite goal of the
fossil fuel industry.
1877 Harvard geologist
Nathaniel Shaler proposed
channeling more of the warm Kuroshio Current through the Bering Strait
to raise temperatures in the Polar region by 30 degrees.
1912, New York Engineer and Industrialist,
Carroll Livingston Riker proposed building a
200 mile jetty off
Newfoundland to increase the Gulf Stream’s flow into to the Arctic
Basin with the added benefit that it would “shift” the axis of planet
earth. The
New York Times characterized the proposal as “amazing”… but not insane.
1929: Hermann Oberth,
German-Hungarian physicist and engineer; Proposed building giant
mirrors on a space station to focus the Sun’s radiation on Earth’s
surface, making the far North habitable and freeing sea lanes to
Siberian harbors.
1945; Julian Huxley,
biologist and Secretary-General of UNESCO 1946-48; Proposed exploding
atomic bombs at an appropriate height above the polar regions to raise
the temperature of the Arctic Ocean and warm the entire climate of the
northern temperate zone.
1946 Village Voice article from 2005 reporting on theMay, 1946 issue of
Mechanix Illustrated that featured
several arctic-warming geoengineering proposals. One “brave new idea”
was proposed by Julian Huxley, then the Secretary-General of UNESCO, and
brother of Aldous Huxley, that would detonate atomic bombs to warm the
Arctic.
1958; M. Gorodsky,
Soviet engineer and mathematician, and Valentin Cherenkov, Soviet
meteorologist; Proposed placing a ring of metallic potassium particles
into Earth’s polar orbit to diffuse light reaching Earth and increase
solar radiation to thaw the permanently frozen soil of Russia, Canada,
and Alaska and melt polar ice.
1958; Arkady Markin,
Soviet engineer; Proposed that the United States and Soviet Union
build a gigantic dam across the Bering Strait and use nuclear
power–driven propeller pumps to push the warm Pacific current into the
Atlantic by way of the Arctic Sea. Arctic ice would melt, and the
Siberian and North American frozen areas would become temperate and
productive.
1958 Russian Oil engineer,
P.M. Borisov’s proposed
melting the Arctic and Greenland icecaps by spreading black coal dust
on the ice, creating cloud-cover across the poles to trap heat and to
divert warm Atlantic waters into the polar regions. This scheme was
taken seriously by Soviet climatologists. Two conferences were held in
Leningrad in the early 1960′s following an initial meeting in Moscow by
the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1959.
1958 Atlantic Richfield geologist
L.M. Natland, proposed exploding up to 100 underground nuclear bombs to mine the
Alberta Oil Sands.
Heat from the detonations was expected to boil the bitumen deposits,
reducing their viscosity to the point that standard drilling operations
could be used. The plan was encouraged by US efforts to find “peaceful
uses” for atomic energy. The project was approved in 1959 but the
Canadian government reversed their decision in 1962 and declared that
Canada was opposed to all forms of nuclear testing. In 2012 the
Canadian Tar Sands are, again an issue of international concern.
1962 Harry Wexler (March 15, 1911- 1962) was an MIT
graduate and PhD in meteorology. Wexler had been researching the link
connecting chlorine and bromine compounds to the
destruction of the stratospheric ozone layers,
but died of a heart attack while on vacation in Woods Hole, Mass.
Wexler had already accepted an invitation to deliver a lecture entitled “
The Climate of Earth and Its Modifications” at the University of Maryland Space Research and Technology Institute.
(Source)
It remains largely unexplained why decades of optimism for warming
the arctic was suddenly replaced with a campaign of fear and doom for
the consequences of warming the arctic under the name of “Global
Warming”
In the 1960’s Geoengineering proposals to warm the Arctic took a largely unexplained U-turn when oceanographer,
Roger Revelle’s
research concluded
that carbon dioxide was already warming the climate for free and
without the need for expensive and risky geoengineering projects.
This U-Turn of direction appeared to be a setback with the exception
of those stakeholders in the energy sector who had been invested in
arctic warming projects for decades.
Did the CO2 story finally promise to give Exxon, BP and Shell what they wanted?
If the science of Roger Revelle’s forecast for global warming turned out to be wrong or too slow, the DoD could step in –
for reasons of national security - to assist arctic warming as secret component of the military’s classified weather modification and weapons program.
The 1996 Air Force document that forecasts “
Owning the Weather in 2025”
would not rule out using Tesla and plasma technologies to increase
arctic temperatures in order to disadvantage a perceived enemy.
A decision
not to intervene might betray the military’s primary objective of
“Full Spectrum Dominance”. After all, access to Oil and Gas has been a national security priority for decades.
In 1966,
Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald was Chairman of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification and wrote:
“Carbon dioxide placed in the atmosphere since the start of the
industrial revolution has produced an increase in the average
temperature of the lower atmosphere of a few tenths of a degree
Fahrenheit.” Gordon MacDonald “Unless Peace Comes: How to Wreck the
Environment. Source
MacDonald was referring to
Roger Revelle and Hans
Suess paper that reversed the debate from how to warm the arctic to how
to avoid warming the arctic. Revelle’s ocean research reported a rise
in carbon dioxide in earth’s atmosphere was allegedly a result of
industrial age manufacturing and coal-burning.
Source
Revelle had worked with the Navy in the late 1940’s
to determine which projects gained funding and successfully promoted the
idea that the Navy should invest more in “basic research”. Revelle was
deeply involved in the global growth of oceanography.
He was also one of the committee chairmen in the influential
National Academy of Sciences studies of the “Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation” (
BEAR), 1954-1964.
Revelle’s world influence was significant as president of the
Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research, an international group of
scientists devoted to advising on international projects.
Revelle and other scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography helped the U.S. government to plan
nuclear weapons tests so that oceanographers might make use of the data.
Source
The conclusions of the
BEAR report were
understandably significant for demonstrating the harmful biological and
environmental damage of atomic radiation and could easily suffice to
thwart geoengineering projects that recommended detonating H-bombs
.
But the evidence is weak that all intentions to mediate arctic climate was totally abandoned.
If the fundamental goal to warm the arctic remains an unspoken
priority of national security in the energy sector, the project could be
taken out of public view and committee oversight to become a classified
operation in the development of the military’s weather warfare program –
an initiative that was acknowledged by civilian weather modification
programs formalized by the 1966 NASA and ICAS charter.
Since 1958 Congress and the military had already been working on
exotic weather warfare systems that involved electromagnetic
manipulation of the ionosphere.
US Congress, Senate, Committee on Inter-State and Foreign Commerce,
Weather Modification Research, Hearing, Washington D.C. US Govt.
Printing Offlce, March 18-19, 1958; Lowell Ponte quotes Capt. Orville as
reporting “that the Dept. of Defense was studying ways to manipulate
the charges of earth and sky and so affect the weather by means of an
electronic beams to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere over a given
area” …. Capt. Orville also discussed ongoing US Air Force experiments
with ‘sodium vapor, ejected from jet planes to intercept solar
radiation ‘ over enemy countries and rain their weather. (The Cooling,
op. cit. pp. 168-169 Source P. 42
The flip-flop from finding ways to warm the arctic to suddenly
finding ways to keep the arctic from warming was announced in 1963 – the
year following the sudden death of Meteorologist, Harry Wexler.
Having total awareness of the military’s 1958 weather weapons program, the National Academy of Sciences
(NAS)recommended the appointment of a “Panel on Weather and Climate Modification”.
source
This event could serve to consolidate military and civilian weather modification programs for peaceful purposes or –
if necessary – as covert weather modification and even
climate warming operations secretly carried out by the military under the catch-all justification of “national security”.
FOLLOW THE MONEY: Lobbyists for Big Oil publicly
claim Global Warming is a hoax while quietly investing billions in new
drilling opportunities due to the reality of receding arctic ice.
The energy sector has made huge investments in ice-breakers and
drilling equipment to profit from the very global warming they are
reluctant to acknowledge.
The position of having your cake while eating it is essential. When
arctic climate warming is revealed as a military climate modification
operation, big oil can fall back on “we told you so”.
Since governments may come and go over the next 100 years, they
calculate the demand for oil – and the companies who drill for it –
will remain intact.
- “As the polar ice cap retreats, energy companies are looking north for a potentially huge new source of crude” Source
- “Shell is one of six companies planning to extract oil, gas and
minerals in the Arctic as global warming melts ice and opens new sea
lanes to commerce.” Source
- “Remote and dangerous sources of arctic oil are becoming
increasingly attractive as the global need for oil grows and the
existing reserves dry up.” Source
Documents from 1966 reveal how the military and federal agencies are modifying the global climate.
TITLE: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification”
This set of documents from 1966 reveals a network of
government agencies in perpetual and secret collaboration , working
with the military to Geoengineer the climate.
Created as an agenda of the elitist
National Academy of Sciences –
decades of an inter-agency culture of secrecy explains why the issue of
covert aerosol Geoengineering is a taboo topic to be degraded to the
status of “conspiracy theory” by every government agency in this web of
complicit bureaucrats at every opportunity.
This is why your local TV “meteorologist” will rarely make a helpful
comment about an unusual sky filled with persistent jet trails.
- 1966, JUN: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification” Prepared by the ICAS select Panel on Weather Modification
- 1966: NOV: A Recommended National Program in Weather Modification – A
Report to the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences
(ICAS) by Homer E. Newell – Associate Administrator for Space Science
and Applications, NASA, Washington, D.C.
- 1966: APPENDIX I – Panel on Weather and Climate Modification to Committee on Atmospheric Sciences NAS-NRC – Membership Recommendations
- 1966: APPENDIX II – Special Commission on Weather Modification – National Science Foundation Membership Recommendations.
- 1966: APPENDIX III
Report prepared by the ICAS Select Panel on Weather Modification;
“Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate
Modification,” dated June 20, 1966
- 1966: APPENDIX IV Memorandum
for Dr. Homer E. Newel1 from J. Herbert Hollomon, Chairman, ICAS,
Subject: National Weather Modification Program, dated June 21, 1966
- 1966: APPENDIX V NASA
Panel to Study Weather Modification Activities; Membership, Chronology
of Meetings, and a Compilation of Supporting Material used by the Panel
- 1966: APPENDIX VI Budget Recommendations and Trends for a National Weather Modification Program
1966 – NASA: A Recommended National Program in Weather
Modification – A report to the Independent Committee for Atmospheric
Sciences (ICAS) by Homer E. Newell – Associate administrator for Space
Science and Applications, NASA, Washington, DC.
In 1966, a report from NASA to
ICAS (
Independent Committee for Atmospheric Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences, NAS)
was the first step in establishing a national Weather modification
program that would ultimately involve multiple federal agencies.
The report focused on four initial agencies:
ESSA, NSF, NASA, and the Dept. of Interior’s
Bureau of Reclamation.
Under Recommended Principals it was noted that (a) each agency would be independently funded while stressing inter-agency cooperation in research.
Independent funding of agencies could make the program less conspicuous and more difficult for Congress to defund.
Also, new agencies could be brought on board without high profile
budget hearings. (b) A designated “central” agency – while having
responsibility for focusing the national program – would not have any
real authority to implement programs, leaving those decisions to
probable unidentified civilian lobbyists and DoD “stakeholders”.
Although the theme of the ICAS report is in the context of protecting
water, agriculture, forests, lands and natural resources, the knowledge
gained from climate manipulation was of more immediate interest to the
military and their industrial complex.
Thirty years following the creation of the Nation Program in Weather Modification, the US Air Force published a document
(“
Owning The Weather in 2025”
) establishing
that federal agencies involved in the National Weather Modification
program are under tacit authority of the Department of Defense.
Owning the Weather in 2025 – Opening Statement:
Current
technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone
who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns
and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current
demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global
stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups
to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.
In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a
part of national security policy with both domestic and international
applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its
interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral
actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership
in an international organization such as the UN, or
participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national
security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national
military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant
benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to
pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential
adversaries.
In this paper we show that appropriate application of
weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never
before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and
space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and
battlespace awareness.1 “The technology is there, waiting for us to pull
it all together;”2 in 2025 we can “Own the Weather
Case Study 2
A 1986 Critique of the 1966 National Weather Modification Initiative
The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System
CASE STUDY Document located on the website of the Federation of American Scientists –
Click Here
This document appears
as an anonymous draft intended as a critique of the US Weather
Modification Program that the author characterizes as hijacked into a
military weapons system.
The final draft is not yet located.
For over 100 years, experts and authors were advocating geoengineering projects warm the arctic.
The public, at large, was entertained by these concepts even when
suggestions to detonate hydrogen bombs over the north pole were
advocated by a nationally recognized weather expert in 1962.
It’s revealing that initial proposals to solve the newly discovered
CO2 “warming” problem had less to do with cutting back on carbon
emissions and more to do with a rush to release toxic atmospheric
aerosols without first, researching the hazards.
The specter of polluting the atmosphere, blocking sunlight and
causing the release of huge volumes of CO2 from the jet aircraft aerosol
sorties is an obvious public health and strategic concern that requires
years of research that the government was unwilling to legislate and
fund.
Therefore, the impatience with which these chemical aerosol schemes
were promoted suggests that emergency steps to cool the planet with
aerosols was never the primary mission.
In 1962, Geoenginnering efforts to warm the arctic were widely
entertained but in 1966 it was top priority to prevent the arctic from
warming by even one degree.
Trojan Horse?: Under
the military’s vision to Own the Weather Weather in 2025 atmospheric
warming with ionospheric and plasma weapons is an established
capability.
The numerous agencies inside the National Weather and Climate
Modification program are actively guarding the military’s aerosol and
energy weapons program with stiff denials to the public and media
whenever the issue of “chemtrails” is a story on local radio or TV
stations.
It’s unacceptable that the UN/IPCC continue to push CO2 as the cause
for climate change but refuse to acknowledge the military has been
actively engaged in climate modification since the mid 1990′s?
An abrupt reversal of policy from promoting arctic climate mediation
to preventing Global Warming resulted in ideas that both polluted the
atmosphere AND became a source of Global Warming.
Just as the ICAS/NASA National Weather Modification program is being
formalized the record shows most ideas to cool the planet suddenly
involve bazaar schemes to spray or disburse particles, biology and dust
into the atmosphere and oceans.
These are the same people who – just a few months earlier, were
eagerly lining up to hear Wexler talk about ways to warm the planet
with hydrogen bombs, destruction of the OZONE and orbital particles.
While most of us realize that many of these proposals from respected
experts would be catastrophic to the environment, not all of these
draconian ideas have been rejected, even as increasing evidence
determines that deploying chemicals into the atmosphere does more harm
than good.
Deployment of geoengineering aerosols as observed in practice for two decades is now regarded as a
source of global warming –
not a fix.:
Geoengineering Aerosols Are Warming the Atmosphere and Are a Source of Global Warming
In 2007, investigator, Cliff Carnicom calculated the impact of the current unacknowledged aerosol deployment into the atmosphere and concludes:
“It can be seen from this model that the results of artificial
aerosol introduction into the lower atmosphere can be of a magnitude
quite on par with the extraordinary impacts projected by even modest and
conservative global warming models upon humans in the near future. As
the model presented herein is intended to be reasonably conservative,
the impact of the aerosol operations could be much greater than these
results show. It is advised that the citizens consider the viability
and merit of this model in the examination of the global warming issue,
and that they openly take aggressive action to halt the intentional
aerosol operations.
This paper is late in its offering, as my availability for
continued research at this level is limited. I am nevertheless hopeful
that the information can be evaluated and assimilated into the many
rationales and arguments that have developed over the last decade to
cease the intentional alteration of the atmosphere of our planet.” –
Cliff Carnicom Complete study
Geoengineering Proposals to Warm the Arctic Are Replaced by Fear of Global Warming
- 1965; President’s Science Advisory Committee,
United States; Proposal: Investigated injecting condensation or freezing
nuclei into the atmosphere to counteract the effects of increasing
carbon dioxide.
- 1977; Cesare Marchetti, Italian industrial
physicist; Coined the term “geoengineering” and proposed sequestering
CO2 in the deep ocean.
- 1983; Stanford Penner, A. M. Schneider, and E. M.
Kennedy, American physicists; Suggested introducing small particles into
the atmosphere to reflect more sunlight back into space.
- 1988; John H. Martin, American oceanographer;
Proposed dispersing a relatively small amount of iron into appropriate
areas of the ocean to create large algae blooms that could take in
enough atmospheric carbon to reverse the greenhouse effect and cool
Earth.
- 1989; James T. Early, American climatologist
suggested deflecting sunlight by 2 percent with a $1 trillion to $10
trillion “space shade” placed in Earth orbit.
- 1990; John Latham, British cloud physicist;
Proposed seeding marine stratocumulus clouds with seawater droplets to
increase their reflectivity and longevity.
- 1992; NAS Committee on Science, Engineering, and
Public Policy proposed adding more dust to naturally occurring
stratospheric dust to increase the net reflection of sunlight.
- 1998: International Space Station (ISS): The first
modular component of the International Space Station (ISS) was launched
and is the current (in 2012) habitable artificial satellite in low Earth
orbit following the Salyut, Almaz, Skylab and Mir. (1998 ISS mission consistent with same year increase in jet aerosol public observations and complaints) The
stated function of the SSI is to provide an international space
platform for research and experimentation in the fields of biology,
human biology, physics, astronomy, meteorology (weather) and other fields.
- 2010: Geoengineer, David Keith (AAAS Meeting)
proposal to use jet aircraft to spray Sulfur dioxide and aluminum
nano-particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space.
In 1968, Gordon J. F. MacDonald authored a chapter in “
Unless Peace Comes“
where he correctly predicted that future means of obtaining
national objectives by force hinges on man’s ability to control and
manipulate the environment of planet Earth.
“When achieved, this power over his environment will provide man
with a new force capable of doing great and indiscriminate damage. Our
present primitive understanding of deliberate environmental change makes
it difficult to imagine a world in which geophysical warfare is
practised. Such a world might be one in which nuclear weapons were
effectively banned and the weapons of mass destruction
were those of environmental catastrophe. As I will argue, these weapons
are peculiarly suited for covert or secret wars.”
“To consider the consequences of environmental modification in
struggles among nations, we need to consider the present state of the
subject and how postulated developments in the field could lead, ten to
fifty years from now, to weapons systems that would use nature in new
and perhaps unexpected ways. “
More Than Owning the Weather in 2025
The confidence and enthusiasm expressed in the USAF 1996 document:
Owning the Weather in 2025 was supported by the advent of scalar weapons technologies during the Reagan Star War years.
The document promises: “
weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined.
The “never before imagined” comment speaks directly to the
HAARP ionospheric heater facility, the Bernard Eastlund patents and
military strategies for global military dominance.
This scenario of weather control harkens to the predictive warning from Gordon MacDonald in chapter in the book:
Unless Peace Comes:How to Wreck the Environment.
Source
Timeline for Owning the Weather: From 1987-1992 ATPI scientists build on Bernard Eastlund’s patents for development of new weapon capabilities
In 1994 ATPI is bought by E-Systems with a contract to build the
biggest ionospheric heater in the world (HAARP). — In 1995, Raytheon
bought E-Systems and old APTI patents. — In 1996 the Air Force
publishes:
Owning The Weather in 2025
In his 2011 book,
Here on Earth: A Natural History of the Planet, scientist and author,
Tim Flanneryreminds
us that proposals to melt the Icecaps were advanced after World War II
by reputable figures including the first director-general of UNESCO
(Julian Huxley-1946), by a top official at the U.S. Weather Bureau, and
by a Russian oil engineer
Petr Mikhailovich Borisov.
Scientific conferences debated the merits, while mining and energy
corporations contemplated the use of nuclear detonations in the
extraction of coal and oil.
Reputable figures in the international community saw an opportunity
to detonate nuclear weapons as a novel and constructive way to
geoengineer the Arctic.
The prevailing rationale to justify method included: (1) The arctic
is nearly too cold to be habitable by humans (2) The polar ice cap
blocks valuable shipping lanes. (3) The expanses of frigid water up
North contributes to uncomfortably cold winters in many countries. (4)
difficulty of drilling for oil through ice.
The idea was publicly floated as a “peaceful use” of atomic weapons.
Flannery offers this example as evidence of humanity’s seeming propensity for hastening its own extinction.
Here on Earth:
A Natural History of the Planet - By Tim Flannery.
Book Reviewby Mark Engler
Russian Oil engineer, P.M. Borisov’s Proposed Method of Melting the Arctic Icecap
Borisov’s idea: If the Arctic ice is
once melted much less of the sun’s radiation will be reflected out into
space and therefore the arctic ice cap will not re-form. An ice-free
Arctic Ocean would be a great boon to oceanic shipping, especially
between Europe and East Asia. Much land in northern Canada and Siberia
would be freed of permafrost and made suitable for agriculture. Borisov
believed that an ice-free Arctic Ocean would lead to increased
evaporation of water and hence increased rainfall worldwide, including
the region of Sahara Desert leading to grass growing there. Borisov
considers all of the impacts of the melting of the Arctic ice cap to be
beneficial. He asserts that the melting of the Greenland ice cap would
raise sea levels at a rate of only 1.5 to 2 mm per year.
This scheme was taken seriously by Soviet climatologists. Two
conferences were held in Leningrad in the early 1960′s following an
initial meeting in Moscow by the Presidium of the USSR Academy of
Sciences in 1959.
Borisov’s suggestions to warm the arctic included:
- Covering great areas of the Arctic with black powders such as coal dust (G. Veksler, 1959) (Carbon Black?)
- Dispersing the cloud cover over the central Arctic Basin (D. Fletcher, 1958) (Geoengineering Aerosols?)
- Deepening of the Thomson Sill (V.N. Stepanov, 1963)
- Covering the water surface with a monomolecular film (M. Budyko, 1962)
- Installations to direct warmer Atlantic water into the Kara Sea (V.P. P’yankov, 1965)
- Pumping cold Arctic water into the Pacific to draw warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Basin (P.M. Borisov, c. 1968)
This concept also required construction of a dam across the Bering Strait. Source: P.M. Borisov, “Can we Control the Arctic Climate?”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March, 1969, pp. 43-48.
In a
related scheme, a proposal was floated to store nuclear waste in the
Antarctic.
The plan would allow specially designed canisters of
hot radioactive waste to melt down through the ice until it reached the “ice-rock interface” where it would
supposedly remain in cold storage for 250,000 years.
The following Timeline is from the book, “Angels Don’t Play This HAARP” Advances in Tesla Technology
by Jeanne Manning and Dr. Nick Begich and contains disturbing facts
about the little known history of our Government’s use of scalar
technologies to modify the weather. Additional events and links were
inserted in 2012 to update the list.
Timeline of public and covert testing and development of energy weapons
- 1886-8: Nikola Tesla invents system of Alternating
Current power source and transmission system. As 60-pulse-per-second
(hertz) AC power grids spread over the land, Earth’s resonance frequency
will eventually dance to a different beat than her usual 7-8 hertz .
- 1900: Tesla applies for patent for a device to transmit Electrical
Energy “Through the Natural Mediums”. U.S. Patent #787,412 issued in
1905
- 1924: Confirmation that radio waves bounce off ionosphere (electrically-charged layer starting at altitude of 50 kilometers).
- 1938: Scientist proposes to light up night sky by electron gyrotron heating from a powerful transmitter.
- 1940: Tesla announces “death ray” invention.
- 1945: Atomic bomb tests begin 40,000 electromagnetic pulses to follow.
- 1952: W.O. Schumann identifies 7.83 hertz resonant frequency of the earth.
- 1958: Van Allen radiation belts discovered (zones of charged
particles trapped in earth’s magnetic field) 2,000+ miles up. VA Belt
violently disrupted with nuclear detonations
- 1958: Project Argus, U.S. Navy explodes 3 nuclear bombs in Van Allen belt.
- 1958: As far back as 1958, the chief White House
adviser on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the DoD
was studying “ways to manipulate the charges of the Earth and sky and
so affect the weather by using an electronic beam to ionise or de-ionise
the atmosphere over a given area.
- 1960: Series of weather disasters begin.
- 1961 – Project Skywater – Bureau of Reclamation (water) cloud seeding project funded by Congress.
- 1961: Copper needles dumped into ionosphere as “telecommunications shield”.
- 1961: Scientists propose artificial ion cloud experiments. In 1960′s
the dumping of chemicals (barium powder etc.) from satellites/rockets
began.
- 1961-62: Soviets and USA blast many EMPs in atmosphere, 300 megatons of nuclear devices deplete ozone layer estimated at 4%.
- 1962: Launch of Canadian satellites and start of stimulating plasma resonances by antennas within the space plasma.
- 1966, June, Report to ICAS by
ICAS Select Panel – Chair, Gordon JF MacDonald. “Future plans of Federal
Agencies in Weather and Climate Modification.”
- 1966, Nov, report from NASA to ICAS (Independent
Comm. for Atmospheric Sciences of the Nat. Academy of Sciences, NAS) was
first step in establishing a National Weather Modification program
- 1966: Gordon J. F. MacDonald publishes
military ideas on environmental engineering. MacDonald was Chair of the
ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification.
- 1960′s: In Wisconsin, US Navy Project Sanguine lays ELF antennae.
- 1968: Moscow scientists tell the West that Soviets pinpointed which
pulsed magnetic field frequencies help mental and physiological
functions and which do harm.
- 1968: Gordon JF MacDonald authors
chapter in book: “Unless peace Comes – a scientific forecast of new
weapons” MacDonald was Chair of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and
Climate Modification.
- 1969: Hail Suppression Data from Western North Dakota, 1969–1972 South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City.
- 1972: First reports on “ionospheric heater”
experiments with high frequency radio waves, at Arecibo. 100-megawatt
heater in Norway built later in decade; can change conductivity of
auroral ionosphere.
- 1972:
Potential Value of Satellite Cloud Pictures in Weather Mod. Projects –
Report prepared for NASA by Institute of Atmospheric Sciences South
Dakota School of Mines and Technology Rapid City.
- 1973: Documentation that launch of Skylab and associated rocket
exhaust gases `’halved the total electron content of the ionosphere for
three hours.
- 1973: Recommendations for study of Project Sanguine’s biological effects denied by Navy.
- 1974: United Nations General Assembly bans environmental warfare. ENMOD
- 1974: High-frequency experiments at Plattesville, Colorado; Arecibo,
Puerto Rico; and, Armidale, New South Wales heat “bottom side of
ionosphere”.
- 1974: Experiments airglow brightened by hitting oxygen atoms in ionosphere with accelerated electrons.
- 1975: Evaluation of Monte Carlo Tests of Effectiveness of Cloud Seeding on Growing Season Rainfall in North Dakota.
- 1975: Stanford professor Robert Helliwell reports that VLF from power lines is altering the ionosphere.
- 1975: U. S. Senator Gaylord Nelson forces Navy to release research
showing that ELF transmissions can alter human blood chemistry.
- 1975: Pell Senate Subcommittee urges that weather and climate
modification work be overseen by civilian agency answerable to U.S.
Congress. No action taken.
- 1975: Soviets begin pulsing “Woodpecker” ELF waves, at key brainwave
rhythms. Eugene, Oregon, one of locations where people were
particularly affected.
- 1976: Drs. Susan Bawin and W. Ross Adey show nerve cells affected by ELF fields.
- 1977: Environmental Impacts of Precipitation Management – Inferences to Project Skywater
- 1979: Launch of NASA’s third High-Energy Astrophysical Observatory
causes large-scale, artificially-induced depletion in the ionosphere.
Plasma hole caused by “rapid chemical processes” between rocket exhaust
and ozone layer.” …“ionosphere was significantly depleted over a
horizontal distance of 300 km for some hours.”
- 1979: Annotated Bibliography of Predictor Variables for Weather Modification Applications - Funded by NSF Grant ATM 79-05007 pub., Illinois State Water Survey, Urbana.
- 1985: Bernard J. Eastlund applies for patent “Method and Apparatus
for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, ionosphere and/or
Magnetosphere,” (First of 3 Eastlund patents assigned to ARCO Power
Technologies Inc.)
- 1986: US Navy Project Henhouse duplicates Delgado (Madrid)
experiment — very low-level, very-low-frequency pulsed magnetic fields
harm chick embryos. 20
- 1987: In the later part of the decade the U.S.
begins network of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers, each to
generate Very Low Frequency (VLF) waves for defense purposes .
- 1987-92: Other APTI scientists build on Eastlund patents for development of new weapon capabilities.
- 1994: Military contractor E-Systems buys APTI,
holder of Eastlund patents and contract to build biggest ionospheric
heater in world (HAARP).
- 1994: Congress freezes funding on HAARP until
planners increase emphasis on earth-penetrating tomography uses, for
nuclear counter proliferation efforts. (Oil and gas exploration)
- 1995-1997: Public complaints accumulate across the
US regarding unusual cloud formations and sudden increase in observable
persistent jet contrails that appear unnaturally under dry atmospheric
conditions. These observations are accompanied by complaints of
biological specimens and web formations that appear to fall from the
sky. Many instances of qualified lab analysis reveal high concentration
of aluminum, barium and other elements that are consistent with DoD
electromagnetic experiments
- 1995: Raytheon buys E-Systems and old APTI patents.
The technology is now hidden among thousands of patents within one of
the largest defense contractor portfolios.
- 1995: Congress budgets $10 million for 1996 under “nuclear counterproliferation” efforts for HAARP project.
- 1995: Test of patent number 5,041,834 to generate an Artificial
Ionospheric Mirror (AIM), or a plasma layer in the atmosphere. The AIM
is used like the ionosphere to reflect RF energy over great distances.
- 1994-6: Testing of first-stage HAARP (euphemistically named High
frequency Active Auroral Research Program) equipment continues, although
funding was frozen.
- 1996: HAARP scientists test the earth-penetrating tomography
applications by modulating the electroject at Extremely Low Frequencies
(ELF)
- 1998: Projected date for fully-operating HAARP system.
- 2009: Operation HAMP – Department of Homeland Security operation to Modify and Steer Hurricanes with Geoengineering Aerosols
- 2012:
Celebrating 50 years of Success. A Compilation of highlights from the
Institute of Atmospheric Sciences at South Dakota School of Mines &
Technology Rapid City.
The World is Waking Up to State Crimes of Climate Warming and
Violent Weather by Combinations of Powerful Electromagnetic Energy
Weapons and Aerosol Geoengineering
It was in the mid- 1990′s when the US public a were suddenly confronted
with unexplained changes in the sky that included bazaar new cloud
formations and new types of jet contrails that persisted in the skies
for hours even while the relative humidity was very low at the altitudes
where the jets were flying.
These observed changes were coincident with events following the 1994
E-Systems purchase of APTI, also holder of plasma physicist,
Bernard Eastlund’s patents and contracts to build the world’s largest ionospheric heater (
HAARP).
The history of the 1966 National weather Modification Program and the
coincidence of events around the time of bazaar new cloud formations is
sufficient reason to pursue the relationship of persistent jet aerosols
to the ionospheric heater experiments at the HAARP facility and Gakona,
AK, Aricebo, PR and many more similar facilities brought online in
recent years.
The ongoing depletion of earth’s protective OZONE layer is a known
risk to manipulation of the ionosphere with powerfully heated beams of
electromagnetic radiation. Pollution from the Shuttle missions, alone
has accounted for rapid ozone depletion according to NASA’s own
documents.
Further damage results when chemical aerosols deployed over either
polar region traps heat in the troposphere resulting in a rise in
surface temperatures to endanger normal formation of seasonal ice with
an associated plunge in stratospheric temperatures into the range of
-109 deg. F. with the formation of chemically contaminated ice crystals
that react with sunlight to further deplete the OZONE.
From 2009 to 2012 persistent jet chemical aerosols are clearly
observed over the North Polar regions on many satellite images and
ground-based photographs. It is no surprise that NASA now reports new
OZONE depletion in far northern latitudes where none was previously
detected.
It’s no secret that government agencies, the military and commercial
interests of the US and abroad have invested in a radical scalar system
of weather modification that is now revealed to have far too many
unintended negative consequences to sustain life on earth.
Continuation of this vast and terra-deforming aerosol geoengineering
operation will only confirm that one agenda is to deplete the arctic ice
– a concept that has been embraced by influential men, Oil companies
and nations for nearly 100 years.
The government, military, IPCC, UN and corporate stakeholders can no
longer pretend to be desperately concerned about global warming and
climate change while the world is waking up to realize these same
entities are participating in the deployment of electromagnetic weapons
and aerosols of massive climate destruction as a monstrous and Orwellian
hoax on humanity.
Related Links:
VIDEO TRANSCRIPT:
NikolaTesla, Inventor of the Death Ray, died in Jan, 1943 wherein the FBI took possession of his papers and documents.
After WWII, Operation “Overcast” (Later named opertion Paper Clip)
was a US program to employ NAZI regime scientists in US laboratories.
The National Security Act, passed in 1947 Created the Central
Intelligence Agency and made possible the rise of the military
industrial complex
to increase opportunities for scientific experiments to be conducted without public knowledge or Congressional oversight.
In 1958, the military announced they were experimenting on the
ionosphere with electronic beams for the purpose of manipulating the
weather.
In 1962 Respected Meteolrologist Harry Wexler proposed geoengineering strategies to warm the planet.
In 1963 the National Academy of Scientists proposed formation of a
panel to create a “National Weather and Climate Modification Program”.
In 1966 Plans to warm the arctic were abandoned without comment to be
replaced with warnings that CO2 was already causing the atmosphere to
get warmer.
This video introduces the article. Global Warming Linked to Advanced Climate Change Technology.
The title sounds provocative but NASA has concluded that man-made,
persistent contrails are exacerbating global warming and could
contribute to long-term changes in Earth’s climate.
The article explores the forgotten history of America’s National
Weather and Climate Modification Program – Still in existance - and how
it rapidly evolved into a military/civilian weather warfare program of
mass destruction.
The documentation and subsequent critique reveals a program that went
into rapid mission creep when the military became involved. The
critique was drafted in 1986 by a member of the Union of Atomic
Scientists.
The record shows that industrialists and their scientists have been
looking for ways to warm the arctic for 100 years beginning in 1877 when
Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler proposed diverting warm Atlantic
water into the Arctic Sea.
Decades of arctic warming proposals followed until 1962 when
respected MIT meteorologist, Harry Wexler proposed 3 schemes to increase
the global temperature of the Earth by 1.7°C,:
(1) Detonate 10 hydrogen bombs in the arctic ocean to send ice crystals into the polar atmosphere
(2) Destroy the ozone layer by using aircraft to spray chlorine or bromine into the stratosphere .
(3) Launch dust particles into equatorial orbit to diffuse light to heat to warm the polar regions.
These ideas sound pretty frightening today, but in 1962 Wexler’s
ideas were gaining traction and nobody “important” was calling him a
lunatic. But following Wexler’s untimely death that same year the
problem of how to warm the planet completely reversed polarity.
Suddenly – and without explanation - it was now imperative to find ways
to cool the planet and to keep the atmosphere from warming.
The U-turn in national direction came about when a paper was
published by oceanographer, Roger Revelle who claimed earth’s atmosphere
was warming due to a buidup of carbon dioxide from burning coal back in
the industrial age.
The new narrtive became “official” for media consumption in 1966 when
Gordon MacDonald – Chairman of the new ICAS Select Panel on Weather and
Climate Modification stated:
“Carbon dioxide placed in the atmosphere since the
start of the industrial revolution has produced an increase in the
average temperature of the lower atmosphere of a few tenths of a degree
Fahrenheit.”
Wexler’s proposals to warm the planet were never mentioned again but
remained quietly popular with stakeholders in the oil and energy markets
who had always seen vast opportunities for new shipping lanes and
drilling as soon as the ice melted a bit.
In view of NASA’s position that man-made persistent contrails are exacerbating global warming – what are we to think?
If these man-made clouds are normal water vapor we have a problem
that accelerates global warming. But If the problem can be fixed, and
no governrnment authority has yet thought it was important enough to
take immediate action we can reasonably assume that warming the climate
with persistent contrails is a tolerable or even desired outcome.
And if If man-made clouds are revealed to be chemical aerosols
deliberately sprayed into the atmosphere we can reasonably assume that
heating the atmosphere is a hidden agenda inside a covert aerosol
operation that mimmicks the appearance of a geoengineering plan to cool
the planet.
In reality, the chemical aerosol operations provide plausible
deniablity to spectators that our benevolent government is secretly
spraying the skies to test ways to mitigate global warming for the good
of humanity.
This plausible deniaility is taught to us through media coverage of
geoengineers lake David Keith who presents aerosol “cooling” strategies
in frequent public appearances that are – in turn – presented as news in
multiple media sources..
So, the agenda to warm the planet is cleverly hidden in plain sight
disguised as an undisclosed but benevolent government program to test
aerosol spraying to cool the planet if we should ever decide it’s
necessary.
Meanwhile, arctic ice continues to retreat despite decades of “testing”.
Aerosols are not the sole requirement in advanced climate change technology.
High energy ionospheric heaters, Tesla Arrays, and exotic
electromagnetic devices are required to interact with chemical aerosols
in ways that normal water vapor contrails never could.
