Scientific Evidence Proves Ebola Is Airborne and Our Liberian Bound Troops Are Walking Into a Death Trap

(by Dave Hodges, InvestmentWatch) -- On the surface, the Presidential order to send 3,000 military personnel to Ebola-ridden is nothing but sheer lunacy. This 3 day old order have left people scratching their heads  and wondering if Obama has lost his mind.
This article will shed light on the fact that Obama is acting with depraved indifference and the evidence is clear, Ebola is much more contagious than the government is telling the people and the available science speaks clearly to this fact.

<br/>

Doctors Are Condemning the Sending of US Troops to Liberia

Dr. Lee Hieb, former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons has stated that “You can see that these doctors, who are highly trained people, got themselves infected… So sending troops into an area, if they’re dealing one-on-one with a patient, they’re not going to be able to protect themselves very well. It’s not easy to [prevent transmission], because you get tired and you get careless and you make some simple mistakes. All it takes is one virus particle.”
Elaine Donelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, has stated that,  “I’m just appalled. Judging from this, the United States seems to have a very confused vision of what ‘national security’ means.” Donelly went on to state that Obama is putting both our troops and their families at risk.

Our Three Thousand Liberia Bound Troops Are in Grave Danger

Some scoffed when I published that researchers from the Canadian government discovered, in 2009, that Ebola could be transmitted across species through airborne means. This led to speculation that if Ebola could be transmitted through airborne means between mammals from different species, could humans be vulnerable to the same process? The suggestion was met with some derision.
Further research indicates that scientists have known for six to eight years that Ebola is an airborne virus as well as the means of transmission that the corporate controlled media tells you about (i.e. bodily fluids).
I find it incredulous that the mainstream media, the CDC, the NIH and the Obama administration are silent as to the gravity of the Ebola threat in which millions of people in this country and billions in the entire world are at greater risk because of these crimes of omission being committed against humanity by the aforementioned entities.
There presently exists a mountain of work that shows just how Ebola is transmitted through the air. And still, not one airport has been shut down and not one of these studies has aired in the mainstream media.

What Do We Really Know About the Transmission of Ebola?

No one knows for certain how Ebola virus is transmitted from one person to the next. The virus has been found in the saliva, stool, breast milk, semen, and blood of infected persons. The virus has been found in the saliva, stool, breast milk, semen, and blood of infected persons.
Body fluids (e.g. vomit, diarrhea, blood, and saliva) can result in the inhalable aerosol particles in the immediate vicinity of an infected person. Coughing was identified among some cases in a 1995 outbreak in Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Coughs are widely known to emit viruses in respirable particles. Actual vomiting produces an aerosol and has been implicated in airborne transmission of gastrointestinal viruses. Regarding diarrhea, toilet flushing emits a pathogen-laden aerosol that disperses in the air.
If you are still not convinced that we are sending our troops into a situation where they will likely contract Ebola through airborne transmission, then consider that  both Marburg and Ebola viruses can be isolated from sera and tissue culture medium at room temperature for up to 46 days!  Even in the most optimal of conditions, aerosolized Ebola, and Reston viruses, at 50% to 55% relative humidity and 72°F, had biological decay rates of 3.06%. and 1.55% per minute, respectively. These rates indicate that 99% loss in aerosol infectivity would occur in 104, and 162 minutes, respectively. Simply put, when our troops walk into an infected zone, they can be infected for one hour and 44 minutes after the release of the Ebola into the air. When it comes to Ebola Reston, the virus can be contracted through aerosolized means for a period of two hours and forty-two minute, almost three hours!
There is also strong experimental evidence that Ebola can be transmitted by airborne means.Jaax et al reported the unexpected death of two rhesus monkeys housed approximately three meters from monkeys infected with Ebola virus, concluding that respiratory or eye exposure to aerosols was the only possible explanation.
This scientific evidence merely scratches the surface with regard to the available data related to these facts as they are presented in this article.

Obama Is Making Good On His Transparency Promise

Healthcare workers have experienced very high rates of morbidity and mortality in the past and current Ebola virus outbreaks. A facemask, or surgical mask, offers no or very minimal protection from infectious aerosol particles.
Soldiers armed with far less protective gear than healthcare workers who are contracting the Ebola virus in great numbers, are going to get slaughtered. And for what? What possible mission can combat troops fulfill in a healthcare mission? How can anyone conclude that Obama is not deliberately putting several thousand troops at risk by inserting these men and women into Liberia? Some have speculated that this Obama’s way of beginning the degradation of our military. I must admit that this must be considered as a distinct possibility.
A concerned and competent President would be preventing flights from Ebola outbreak areas from entering the U.S., and we should be coercing our allies to do the same. Instead, this President has overseen the obliteration of our southern borders, thus, making the citizens of this country vulnerable to the entry of Ebola from illegal immigrants emanating from West Africa as well as the distinct possibility of inviting an Ebola bio-terror attack.

An Interesting Alternative Theory

One of my military sources has suggested that this is Obama’s way of covertly building up our troop presence in Africa in preparation for fighting against the Chinese troops. He contends that in actuality, only a small part of Liberian contingent will be put in harms way. The bulk of the troops will be preparing for World War III on the African continent.

[Listen] Saving the Republic May Require Military to “Stand Up” – Generals Vallely and McInerney

Posted on 2 September, 2014 by Rick Wells

Retired Generals Thomas McInerney and Paul Vallely are interviewed on the Trunews radio program, giving their insight into the current state of affairs and the dangers that face our nation. They have some very serious concerns regarding the immediate threats that face our nation. The interview begins at the 17:50 point of the video.
General McInerney has been suggesting for the last week or two that something big was coming in the way of revelations in the first week of September. We learn in this interview that he was speaking regarding the upcoming release of a book detailing the events surrounding the Benghazi attacks and the failures and misdeeds of members of the Obama regime, which run all the way to the very top of his most corrupt administration.
General McInerney is calling for a declaration domestically of America’s highest alert level, DEFCON 1, with a message that something is about to happen. He doesn’t know what it will be, but something bad is coming, he is certain of it.
They talk about the threat posed by terrorist organizations who have gained access to America through our open southern border and as significant and the upcoming anniversary of 9/11 the likely timing for another attack.
Vallely talks of the treasonous acts committed by Hussein Obama, appropriately calling what our nation faces a state of constitutional crisis. He says plainly that we don’t have enough men and women standing up in defense of our nation and our Constitution.
Wiles asks why is it, how has America changed sides and joined up with our enemies?
McInerney says that is one of the reasons why it is so worrisome. Most Americans don’t understand what is happening. He agrees that we are reaching a crisis in this country, that the terrorists for the next attack have already entered the country through our southern border.
He says we have to stand up, get out of a political mode and into an action mode.
Vallely says the United States cannot afford to put amateurs in charge of our government and national security. The difference between Obama and Putin, illustrates the point.
Both agree that we have a domestic enemy running our nation. Crimes by our leadership such as aiding and abetting the enemy have never been faced by our nation in the past, but that is where we are now. Vallely says that the right of the people is to demand the resignation of the criminals who have hijacked our government.
The interview is a wealth of information from two very informed military experts speaking directly and is well worth a listen.

Rick Wells is a conservative author who recognizes that our nation, our Constitution and our traditions are under a full scale assault from multiple threats. Please “Like” him on Facebook, “Follow” him on Twitter or visit www.rickwells.us

New Rule In Pittsburgh, PA:

AutoInsuranceGuardian.com

The God Vitamin

Live Cell Research

Whoa! NFL Cheerleaders Wardrobe Fails

NFL Hot News

Odd Trick "Destroys" Diabetes

DiabetesProtocol

Playboy: Celebs Who Have Bared It All!

Pressroom VIP

17 Gay Actors Who Pretend To Be Straight

PopNHop

Do YOU Like BOOBS?

Vyped

Water Secret Takes Fluoride Out

Water Liberty

[Listen] Gen Jerry Boykin – Marxists Have Taken Over Govt, Citizens Must Become More Engaged

Posted on 16 September, 2014 by Rick Wells

General Jerry Boykin appears on the TruNews radio program and discusses the border situation, and the terrorist threat that is being exponentially increased by Hussein Obama’s policy of allowing anyone who chooses to come into America to do so unchallenged and at will.
He affirms with certainty that what exists on the southern border, particularly in certain areas, such as south of El Paso in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, we have a war zone.
As a former Delta Force commander, the General is familiar with what a war zone looks like. He details some of common occurrences, the dismembered bodies being discovered and the background of intermittent gunfire, saying, “The legal residents are really putting up with a lot down there right now.”
Boykin says, “Up until probably less than a decade ago and really more three to five years ago, the drug cartels tried to stay under the radar, they didn’t want to draw attention, they wanted to be able to move their drugs and all of that.” He describes how Hezbollah and Hamas infiltrated the cartels, which was what led to the appearance of gruesome brutality as a weapon of intimidation.
General Boykin describes the preparations made by the Obama regime for the invasion, with prior knowledge, the recruitment of babysitters and facilities for warehousing the invaders. He believes, as most who have been paying attention to this invasion do, that this was very orchestrated, and that “those four-year-olds didn’t walk across the border from Guatemala into Mexico.”
He also discusses the terrorists, thugs, and hardcore criminals who came across under the cover of “the children,” both the narrative and the physical diversion and distraction. He adds, “It’s been orchestrated and it’s just as phony as it can be.”
Wiles points out how orchestrating an invasion and ordering a stand down of our defenses is treason. Boykin agrees, saying this is an absolutely lawless regime. The problem is that there is no leadership within our Congress that is willing to take him to task.
They raise the point that an imperial president who has the authority to grant citizenship would also then in effect have the power to remover citizenship. General Boykin describes Americans as being asleep at the switch, not paying attention to what is going on because they live in an atmosphere of amusement, they seek amusement first.
Asked why the Republicans are so docile, Boykin says the last thing they want to do is go down in history as impeaching the first black president. That has given them a pass to do as they please. Wiles says, they ought to be concerned with impeaching the first communist president.
Boykin agrees and says that exactly what was outlined in “The Communist Manifesto” as the means by which to move a society towards Marxism is what we are doing in America today.
Mr. Wiles asks General Boykin for his perspective on comments made a couple of weeks ago on his program by retired General Paul Vallely and Lt. Gen Tom McInerney, that “they believe the United States is quickly moving to a place where military commanders are going to have to make a decision about whether they are going to honor the oath that they swore to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic.”
The General believes that what is likely is that the active duty generals and admirals are going to resign in protest or compromise their principles and continue to support the feckless, inept policies of this administration.
Boykin is encouraged and hopeful, saying he sees more Americans waking up, citing one card-carrying Democrat who asked how to get the criminal regime out of office. He says they are starting to realize that things are bad and they’re getting worse, and that nothing is going to change unless average Americans get involved and engaged.

Rick Wells is a conservative writer who recognizes that our nation, our Constitution and our traditions are under a full scale assault from multiple threats. Please “Like” him on Facebook, “Follow” him on Twitter or visit www.rickwells.us

Egyptian Government Shoots And Kills Muslim Palestinians For Trying To Bring Terrorism In Their Country

By Ted on September 21, 2014 in Featured, General

By Theodore Shoebat
Egyptian forces opened fire on Palestinians trying to infiltrate into their country for terrorist purposes, as we read in an informative article:

Egypt forces shoot Palestinians infiltrating through Gaza tunnel
Security forces shot dead a Palestinian and wounded two others Saturday after they tried to enter Egypt from Gaza through a tunnel under the border town of Rafah, security officials said.
The men, who were spotted by a security patrol, tried to run back into the tunnel after being ordered to stop and were shot.
Egypt’s army says it has destroyed more than 1,600 tunnels connecting the Sinai Peninsula and the Gaza Strip, most of them since the ouster of Islamist president Mohammad Mursi last year.
The Islamist group Hamas, the main power in the blockaded Palestinian enclave, uses the tunnels to smuggle in arms, food and money.
Cairo has poured troops into the peninsula to counter a rising insurgency since Mursi’s overthrow.
Israel went to war with Hamas in July, in part with the objective of destroying tunnels, including ones under the border with the Jewish state.
The war, which took the lives of 2,140 Palestinians and 73 on the Israeli side, ended with an open-ended truce on August 26.
In a separate incident in Sinai, security officials announced the death on Saturday of a leader from Egypt’s deadliest militant group, Ansar Beit al-Maqdis (Partisans of Jerusalem).
Officials said the slain militant was an explosives expert who was attempting with three others to plant a roadside bomb.
The militant group has claimed two bombings of security convoys this month, killing 16 policemen.
Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has carried out some of the worst attacks against Egyptian security forces in the peninsula and elsewhere since Mursi’s ouster.
The group says its attacks are in retaliation for a deadly government crackdown on Mursi supporters.

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE A DONATION THAT WILL SAVE CHRISTIAN LIVES FROM ISLAMIC PERSECUTION

The 100-Year-Old Agreement You Need to Know About to Understand What’s Driving the Islamic State

Sep. 18, 2014 8:45pm Erica Ritz

18.7K

Shares

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

Glenn Beck broke down the history of the Middle East on his television program Thursday, focusing on a nearly 100-year-old agreement that he says is integral to understanding the motivations of the Islamic State: the Sykes-Picot Agreement.
If you do not understand the Sykes-Picot Agreement, Beck said, you cannot fully understand the Islamic State, or why the Israelis and the Palestinians will never reach a two-state solution.
Though many go back to 1948 and the creation of the modern state of Israel when examining the history of Middle Eastern conflicts, Beck said you actually have to go back to 1916 and World War I.
T.E. Lawrence and World War I

Glenn Beck speaks about T.E. Lawrence, right, on his television program September 18, 2014. (Photo: TheBlaze TV)

“This is the last time the Arab world had a united Islamic State led by a religious leader: the Ottoman Empire, the caliphate,” Beck began. “The Allies knew the Ottoman Empire could shut down key shipping routes and cripple Britain’s economy, France’s. … They had to neutralize it. So Great Britain sent over an Army officer from Britain, and his name was T.E. Lawrence. There was a movie made about him, a great movie with Peter O’Toole called ‘Lawrence of Arabia.’”
Lawrence was tasked with convincing the Arabs to fight against the Ottoman Empire. After Lawrence promised the Arabs rule over a new united Arab kingdom of greater Syria — which encompassed present day Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and parts of Iraq and Jordan — he succeeded.
“To get to the root of the current Middle East conflict, that is your starting point,” Beck said. “It is at the center of everything that is happening today.”
“The problem here — Great Britain never intended to honor the promises that they made,” Beck continued. “They had used the Arabs in order to protect their own interests. Remember, they needed to get the Ottoman Empire out of the way.”
Sykes-Picot Agreement
“The entire time Lawrence was negotiating with the Arabs, Great Britain, behind everybody’s back, was negotiating with France, and planning how they were going to actually divide up the Middle East after the war,” Beck said. “They needed to make sure there was no united Arab kingdom that would ever get in the way.”
Under the Sykes-Picot agreement, the British and the French drew new boundaries, fracturing the region so, Beck said, “the British and their allies in the region could control it.”
“Remember, the goal was to divide the Arabs, not to unite them, divide them, so they could protect the trade routes,” Beck said. “They didn’t care about the Arabs, they didn’t care about the Jews, they didn’t care about anything. They wanted the trade routes.”
“The Arabs were forced to accept this western European model of the nation-states because they had no choice,” Beck remarked. “Arab resentment grows in the wake of that treaty, Sykes-Picot, where they have divided everything and made new lines. They wanted — the Palestinians, the Arabs — what was promised to them — the rule of greater Syria.”

Complimentary Clip from TheBlaze TV

Your browser does not support iframes. The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
In the decades after the Sykes-Picot Agreement, after the Ottoman Empire collapsed, the British created the British Mandate for Palestine. The area east of the Jordan River was called Transjordan, and the area west of it was a land for the Jewish people.
“How would the Arab world be able to unite now? They needed a new rallying cry. They would use the Balfour Declaration, Britain’s promise of a Jewish homeland in Palestine,” Beck said. “[They] needed to start blaming the Jews, the pawns.”
“The motive becomes clear when you see how the Arab world reacted when the British Mandate in Palestine was set to expire,” Beck said. “The Palestinian Arabs were about to be presented with a chance to finally have what they said they’d always dreamed of. All they wanted was their own land. So now, here comes the UN, and they have this mandate.”
“Remember, the British put together this partition — Transjordan and the Israeli state. So it was a two-state solution. It was split 56 percent Jewish, 43 percent Arab. 56 looks big, but much of the land’s not sufficient for crops, so it’s pretty close. Jerusalem, an international zone. The Jewish people accepted the plan. And if a Palestinian homeland was the goal for the Arab world — not the Palestinians, the Arab world — all they had to do was agree. But remember, the scapegoat goes away.”

Glenn Beck speaks on his television program September 18, 2014. (Photo: TheBlaze TV)

“The real goal … was uniting the Arab kingdom, one united Arab kingdom, a return of the Ottoman Empire, gaining control of greater Syria,” Beck said. “If you make peace with Israel, that all goes out the window. So when they were presented with what they said they always wanted, a nation of their own, they said no. And then all hell broke loose.”
The Arab world promised that they would get the Palestinians a homeland, waging all-out war on Israel.
“By all reasonable estimates, Israel should have been utterly destroyed. Five Arab armies with huge advantages in armor, artillery, and air force [were against it]. Despite suffering huge casualties early on, somehow this tiny new nation, the Jewish people, managed to stave off the assault and then go on the offensive,” Beck said.
But one aspect of the War of 1948 isn’t often taught, Beck said.
“Before the war broke out, Jordan made a secret deal with Israel. They wanted the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Jews weren’t promised this land in the UN partition, so they agreed to let Jordan take it,” Beck said. “Jordan actually attacked Palestinian Arabs to get that land. Where is that in the history books? Egypt wanted southern Palestine. Iraq wanted the entire fertile crescent under their control, and Syria and Lebanon wanted northern Palestine — where was the Palestinian state?”

A map on The Glenn Beck Program showed the territorial aspirations of Middle Eastern countries during the War of 1948. (Photo: TheBlaze TV)

“You see, it wasn’t about freedom for the Palestinian Arabs, or the Jewish occupation. This war was what wars are always about — land, power, control,” Beck said. “Israelis today remember it as the war of Independence. Palestinians call it the nakba, ‘catastrophe.’ …But when you actually know the history, the only catastrophe was when the Palestinians rejected their chance of a nation of their own, and then were sold out by their Arab neighbors.”
Sykes-Picot and the Islamic State
“I know I read about [the Sykes-Picot Agreement] years ago when we were at Fox, and I put it up on the chalkboard,” Beck remarked. “But it didn’t all fall into place until I learned about ISIS and ISIL, and the difference between ISIS and ISIL. Now it all makes sense to me, and now you’ll be able to figure out what is really going on.”
Radical Islamists in the Islamic State — also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant — are trying to regain the territory they were promised before the Sykes-Picot Agreement, Beck said. If you understand that, the revolutions of the Arab Spring and the goals of the Islamic State become much clearer.
“How do you get there?” Beck asked, pointing to the map of the territory the Islamic State is trying to recover. “First thing you do, you have to destabilize the region. And how do you destabilize the region? What did Sykes-Picot do? Sykes-Picot made all of these new maps, and they drew new borders that had never been drawn before. And these borders put people who were never together under one rule, the British knowing that if they did that, it would take a strong man to keep them from fighting and killing each other.”
To get rid of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, Beck said “you have to go after the dictators.”
“Our president, and all of us, cheered when we got rid of the dictators in Egypt … Libya … Iraq … Now we’re going after Syria,” Beck said. “Next will be Jordan and Lebanon, and then Israel.”

Demonstrators celebrate in Tahrir Square in Cairo, Egypt, Friday Feb. 18, 2011. Tens of thousands of flag-waving Egyptians packed into Tahrir Square for a day of prayer and celebration Friday to mark the fall Hosni Mubarak.(AP Photo/Khalil Hamra)

“Look at the map,” Beck said. “The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. … They’re doing nothing but remolding the map closer to their heart’s desire, and what they were promised 100 years ago. Now is their opportunity to achieve what they’ve always wanted from the very beginning: a return to a unified Arab kingdom. What a surprise, a caliphate. Islamic rule. There’s no judgement on this one way or another — this is just the fact. They want an end to the west and what the west created with Sykes-Picot. To get there, the best way to do it is to destabilize all these dictators, get them out of the way.”
Beck said the Israelis and the Palestinians have been used as scapegoats for decades.
“You think this is a crazy theory?” Beck asked. “Here’s ISIL in their own words on what’s happening, why are they doing this.”
Beck proceeded to play an Islamic State propaganda video titled “The End of Sykes-Picot”:
“You’ll notice this is playing all over the Middle East,” Beck said. “Here they are, on the Syrian border, showing how they’ve erased it, and how Britain and France lied to the Arab world.”
Beck said radical Islamists will use anyone, including the Jews and the Palestinians, to achieve their goals, and that is why “there will never be a two-state solution.”
“That’s not the goal, never has been,” Beck concluded. “Until the region is fully under Arab control, the fighting will never, ever, ever stop. There is no easy solution. I don’t know how you turn the cycle of violence around. But the first thing you have to do is put facts in place. You have to start with the truth.”

Complimentary Clip from TheBlaze TV

Your browser does not support iframes. The full episode of The Glenn Beck Program, along with many other live-streaming shows and thousands of hours of on-demand content, is available on just about any digital device. Click here to watch every Glenn Beck episode from the past 30 days for just $1!

U.N. counts 3 million Syria refugees

By Jason Hanna, CNN

updated 5:33 AM EDT, Sat August 30, 2014

ISIS boasts of mass execution in Syria

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

• NEW: U.N.: 44 peacekeepers seized near Golan Heights "are safe and in good health"
• U.N.: 3 million have left Syria during civil war; 6.5 million others are internally displaced
• Almost half of all Syrians forced to leave their homes, agency says
• More than 80% of refugees are struggling to make a living, U.N. says

(CNN) -- The number of people who have fled Syria and registered as refugees amid the country's civil war was to surpass 3 million Friday, and a further 6.5 million are believed to be displaced within the war-torn nation, the U.N. refugee agency said.

That means almost half of all Syrians have been forced to leave their homes amid the roughly three-year conflict, and one in eight has fled across the border, the agency said.

In terms of scope and budget, the U.N.'s effort to help the Syrian refugees is the largest in the agency's 64-year history, spokesman Adrian Edwards said.

"The Syrian crisis has become the biggest humanitarian emergency of our era, yet the world is failing to meet the needs of refugees and the countries hosting them," Antonio Guterres, the U.N. high commissioner for refugees, said in a news release Friday.

Does Obama have a strategy for ISIS?

Westerners fighting with ISIS a 'growing threat'

Rebels: Second American jihadi killed

The data come a week after the U.N. said it had documented the killings of 191,369 men, women and children in Syria from March 2011, when an uprising began, to the end of April this year.

The uprising began with mostly peaceful protests against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Daraa province. Syria responded with a ferocious crackdown against demonstrators and has consistently said it is battling armed terrorist groups as it targeted anti-government protesters.

The war, pitting an Alawite Muslim-dominated regime against a largely Sunni Muslim insurgency, has torn the country apart. Numerous factions, some of them Islamist, oppose the government, and one of them -- ISIS, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria -- has captured large swaths of northern and eastern Syria for what it says is its new Islamic caliphate.

Refugees "are arriving in a shocking state, exhausted, scared and with their savings depleted," the U.N.'s refugee agency said. "Most have been on the run for a year or more, fleeing from village to village before taking the final decision to leave."

Most of the refugees are in countries neighboring Syria, including Lebanon (1.14 million), Jordan (608,000) and Turkey (815,000). Governments estimate that hundreds of thousands more are in their countries but unregistered, putting a strain on their economies, the U.N. said.

Donors have given more than $4.1 billion to help, but more than $2 billion more is needed by the end of 2014, including to help more than 2.4 million people prepare for the winter, the U.N. said.

More than 80% of the refugees are struggling to make a living in communities outside of camps, and more than a third are living in substandard shelters, the U.N. said.

"The response to the Syrian crisis has been generous, but the bitter truth is that it falls far short of what's needed," Guterres said.

In far southwestern Syria, near the border crossing with the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, militants detained 44 U.N. peacekeepers from Fiji for a second straight day on Friday, the United Nations said.

These peacekeepers "are safe and in good health," the United Nations said Friday, citing "credible sources" since its officials had not yet talked directly with those being held.

The United Nations said militants detained the peacekeepers on Thursday, a day after taking the crossing from the Syrian regime.

Those holding the peacekeepers are members of the al Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front, one of the groups fighting the al-Assad government, an Israeli military official told CNN on condition of anonymity.

In addition, 72 U.N. peacekeepers from the Philippines were "restricted to their positions" Thursday and Friday near Syrian villages in the area, the organization said without elaborating. Syrian rebels were firing at about half of the peacekeepers early Saturday, according to PNA, the Philippines official news agency.

The United Nations has said it is talking with a variety of groups to try to secure the detained peacekeepers' release.

The world body revised the number of detained and restricted peacekeepers Friday from its earlier count of 43 and 81, respectively. The new count, it said, came after a check of the peacekeepers' leave records.

The Fijian peacekeepers were detained Thursday morning near the Syrian town of Quneitra, the location of the border crossing that rebels had captured, according to the United Nations.

Al-Nusra Front fighters and other Syrian rebels seized control of the Syrian side of the Quneitra crossing Wednesday, a capture that represents a new dynamic in a war long feared not only for its deadly effects inside Syria but for threatening to widen into a destabilizing regional conflict.

During the fighting Wednesday between Syrian forces and rebels, three errant mortar rounds and some small-arms fire crossed into Israeli-controlled territory, Israeli military spokesman Lt. Col. Peter Lerner said.

An Israeli military officer was moderately injured, the military said on Twitter, and Israeli forces responded by striking two Syrian military positions.

U.N. peacekeepers have been in the Golan Heights area since 1974, charged with maintaining a ceasefire between Syrian and Israeli forces since a 1973 war.

Israel seized control of the Golan Heights during the 1967 Six-Day War and fought off an attempt by Syria in 1973 to retake the rocky plateau.

In 1981, Israel annexed the Golan Heights. It is considered to be occupied territory by the international community.

CNN Exclusive: A 13-year-old witness to ISIS's beheadings

What can U.S. do against ISIS in Syria?

CNN's Richard Roth contributed to this report.

AND NOW THE END BEGINS HERE COMES THE SAUGHTER OF THE AMERICAN CHRISTIANS Obama Allowing the UN to Dump Hundreds of Thousands of Syrian Muslims in America

Obama Allowing the UN to Dump Hundreds of Thousands of Syrian Muslims in America

in News, Politics, World News / by Dom the Conservative / on September 21, 2014 at 6:44 pm /

Iraq and Syria are perhaps the most unstable countries in the Middle East and extremely dangerous hubs for non-Muslims, especially Christians.
While ISIS has wiped out a large number of Christians, they are also widely attacking smaller denominations of other Muslims.
Because of such sweeping displacement, more than 1.2 million Iraqis have fled their homes in Iraq for the safest nearby countries. Syria was the only option for some. Out of these, around 200,000 are Christians. For these Christians surrounded by Muslim countries, France is the closest haven.
More than 10,000 Iraqi Christians have already applied for asylum with a French association that help minorities in the Middle East. In July, Paris announced it would be ready to take in hundreds if not thousands.
So, what about all the Muslim refugees fleeing Syria? Won’t they be welcomed at one of the many Islamic countries? According to the Obama administration, this is not an option.
Since the early 90s, the UN high commissioner for refugees has selected 200,000 to 250,000 refugees from Islamic countries to send to the U.S. Most come from Somalia and Iraq, and Obama has prepared for months to dump hundreds of thousands of Syrian Muslim refugees on American cities, just like our new illegal alien neighbors from our Southern border.
“That’s a huge number,” said Ann Corcoran, a writer and researcher for Refugee Resettlement Watch, a group that monitors the U.N.’s distribution of foreign refugees throughout the United States. “Most of the Syrian refugees in these refugee camps are Sunni Muslims; they’re not Christians,” said Corcoran. “The camps in places like Turkey and Jordan, you’re not going to find a ton of Christians.”
The news came to light when a U.S. State Department spokeswoman recently hinted at her daily press briefing that a new wave of refugees will soon be coming from war-torn Syria.

The Winston-Salem Journal reported that the Triad area of North Carolina could receive some of the refugees, and that the first Syrian family has already arrived in Greensboro, North Carolina, and is living in a hotel there.
Social services in Ohio were also preparing for “a flood of refugees” from Syria and Iraq later this year according to The Cleveland Pain Dealer. Cleveland, Akron and Columbus have been hotspots in the past for Muslim refugees coming from the Middle East.

With the arrival of such masses comes the financial responsibility upon taxpayers. Upon settlement, they are immediately connected to food stamps, Medicaid, and subsidized housing among other welfare programs.
Their children will also subsequently be enrolled in public schools.
Since the average family from these countries has more children than a typical American family, we will see a hasty rise in the refugee population, which equally brings about the rise of the Muslim population. As such, the refusal to assimilate and the demand for Sharia law and other Islamic accommodations will rapidly increase.
Aside from the cultural clashes and taxpayer-funded handouts, we are in danger of Syrian rebels and ISIS insurgents seeking asylum in the U.S. to infiltrate unnoticed. After all, if 40 Americans have just returned from fighting for ISIS completely unhindered from resuming their lives among us, why would hundreds of thousands of Syrian “refugees” be considered a threat by our government.

Putin’s rhetoric. According to the NATO website, “Article 5 has been invoked once – in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1484957/vladimir-putin-threatens-world-war-3-says-russia-could-invade-europe-within-two-days/#E91coAuaEfpHr0IG.99

http://www.nato.int/nato-welcome/

Berichte des ukrainischen Präsidenten Putin soll Europa massiv gedroht haben

18. September 2014 05:00

Berichte des ukrainischen Präsidenten Putin soll Europa massiv gedroht haben

Bild vergrößern

Drohungen gegen Europa? Wladimir Putin bei einer Rede

(Foto: Bloomberg)

Anzeige

Russische Truppen binnen zwei Tagen in Warschau, Riga, Vilnius oder Bukarest: Kremlchef Wladimir Putin soll dem ukrainischen Präsidenten Petro Poroschenko gesagt haben, dass seine Armee zügig osteuropäische Hauptstädte erreichen könnte. Das geht aus einer Gesprächszusammenfassung der EU hervor, die der "Süddeutschen Zeitung" vorliegt.

Von Daniel Brössler, Brüssel

Der russische Präsident Wladimir Putin hat nach Darstellung des ukrainischen Staatschefs Petro Poroschenko Drohungen geäußert, die sich gegen Mitgliedsländer der Nato und der Europäischen Union richten.
Laut einer Gesprächszusammenfassung des Auswärtigen Dienstes der Europäischen Union, die der Süddeutschen Zeitung vorliegt, berichtete Poroschenko dem EU-Kommissionspräsidenten José Manuel Barroso am vergangenen Freitag während dessen Besuchs in Kiew von den Drohungen. Wörtlich habe Putin zu ihm, Poroschenko, gesagt: "Wenn ich wollte, könnten russische Truppen in zwei Tagen nicht nur in Kiew, sondern auch in Riga, Vilnius, Tallinn, Warschau oder Bukarest sein."

Ähnlichkeit mit Barroso-Telefonat

Öffentlich hat Putin bislang Mitgliedern der Nato und der EU nicht mit militärischer Gewalt gedroht. Bekannt geworden war aber ein Telefonat Barrosos mit Putin, in dem dieser gesagt haben soll: "Wenn ich wollte, könnte ich Kiew binnen zwei Wochen einnehmen." Barroso hatte den Staats- und Regierungschefs beim EU-Gipfel Ende August von dem Telefonat berichtet. Der Kreml hatte daraufhin kritisiert, dass Barroso den Inhalt eines privaten Telefonats publik gemacht habe.

Anzeige

Laut der Gesprächszusammenfassung erwähnte Poroschenko die angebliche Äußerung Putins, um deutlich zu machen, wie emotional sich dieser gegen den EU-Einfluss auf Staaten in der russischen Nachbarschaft wende.

Putins angebliche Drohung "Ich könnte Kiew in zwei Wochen einnehmen"

Scharfe Töne aus dem Kreml: Laut Informationen der italienischen Tageszeitung "La Repubblica" soll der russische Präsident Putin EU-Kommissionspräsident Barroso gedroht haben, er sei in der Lage, Kiew in kürzester Zeit einzunehmen. Der ukrainische Verteidigungsminister befürchtet im Krieg gegen Russland "Zehntausende Tote".

Poroschenko hatte in den vergangenen Wochen mehrfach mit Putin telefoniert, um den mittlerweile geltenden Waffenstillstand im Osten der Ukraine auszuhandeln und die Zustimmung des Kremlchefs zu einem Zwölf-Punkte-Plan für die Beilegung des Konflikts zu erhalten. In den Gesprächen hat Putin Poroschenko offenbar davor gewarnt, sich zu sehr auf die EU zu verlassen.
Er könne durch bilaterale Kontakte Einfluss nehmen und eine "Sperrminorität" im Europäischen Rat bewirken, die für Russland negative Entscheidungen verhindere, soll Putin demnach gesagt haben.

Putin angeblich Kiews Distanz zu EU wichtiger als Separatismus

Womöglich spielte der Kremlchef damit auf den wachsenden Widerstand im Rat gegen neue Sanktionen an. Mehrere EU-Länder hatten sich angesichts des Waffenstillstandes in der Ukraine zuletzt für ein Abwarten ausgesprochen, eine zweite Runde von Wirtschaftssanktionen war aber dann doch beschlossen und in Kraft gesetzt worden. Solche Beschlüsse erfordern Einstimmigkeit. Länder wie die Slowakei, Bulgarien, Ungarn und Zypern tragen die Sanktionspolitik nur noch widerwillig mit.

Ihr Forum – Muss sich Osteuropa vor Putin fürchten?

Aus der Zusammenfassung geht auch hervor, dass die bis Januar 2016 verschobene Umsetzung des Freihandelsabkommens mit der EU im Einklang mit Vereinbarungen Poroschenkos und Putins steht. Die Ukraine brauche eine friedliche Lösung, um den Krieg zu beenden, den Russland begonnen habe, sagte Poroschenko. Putin sei es ein Anliegen, die Assoziierung der Ukraine mit der EU zu verhindern. Dies sei ihm womöglich wichtiger als das Schicksal von Luhansk und Donezk.
Mit der Ratifizierung des Assoziierungsabkommens verabschiedete das ukrainische Parlament am Dienstag auch einen Sonderstatus für die von Separatisten kontrollierten Gebiete.

Vladimir Putin Threatens World War 3, Says Russia Could Invade Europe Within Two Days

Vladimir Putin allegedly threatened World War 3 during talks about Ukraine, claiming that Russia could potentially invade and take over the capitals of many European countries within two days.
In a related report by The Inquisitr, both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton claim Putin wants to restore Russia to the glory of an empire that spreads across the globe, and even made comparison to Nazi Germany. Hillary does not believe Putin and Hitler can be directly compared, or claim that Putin starting World War 3, but she did make a comparison to how the Nazis used the German minorities in Poland and Czechoslovakia as an excuse to invade. Some say the situation prior to World War 2 is similar to today since “protecting” Russian speaking citizens of Ukraine are used as the justification for intervention in Ukraine.
The rhetoric related to the Ukraine war has been stepping up to a dangerous level in recent weeks. First, Russia’s nuclear weapons were test fired as a demonstration of Russian military might, and then Vladimir Putin promised to rebuild Russia’s nuclear arsenal. In response to recent advances by Russia within Ukrainian territory, Ukraine also threatened to restart its nuclear weapons program.
An influential German newspaper called Sueddeutsche Zeitung is reporting that Vladimir Putin allegedly had a private meeting with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso. During the course of their discussion, Putin essentially threatened World War 3.

“If I wanted, in two days I could have Russian troops not only in Kiev, but also in Riga, Vilnius, Tallinn, Warsaw and Bucharest.”

This threat by Putin matches a similar statement allegedly said earlier in the month, in which Russia’s leader proclaimed their military force of 20,000 men camped outside Ukraine’s border could take the capital city Kiev within two weeks. In this case, that threat was expanded to include countries like Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland and Romania.
It’s possible that Putin was indirectly responding to a speech given by U.S. President Barack Obama earlier in the month, who also mentioned some of those NATO members.
“An attack on one is an attack on all. So if, in such a moment, you ever ask again, ‘who will come to help,’ you’ll know the answer – the NATO alliance, including the armed forces of the United States of America,” Obama said. “We’ll be here for Estonia. We will be here for Latvia. We will be here for Lithuania.”
If this alleged conversation between Putin, Poroshenko, and Barroso did take place, it would be the first time Putin has directly threatened members of the European Union and NATO. If Russia were to actually ever act on this threat, it really would mean World War 3 would start since Article V of NATO’s Washington Treaty declares that “an attack on one is an attack on all,” which is what President Obama was referring to in his speech. While both the United States and England have rejected calls to send lethal aid into Ukraine, both countries would be obligated by NATO treaties to respond with military force if Russia’s actions were to ever match Putin’s rhetoric. According to the NATO website, “Article 5 has been invoked once – in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1484957/vladimir-putin-threatens-world-war-3-says-russia-could-invade-europe-within-two-days/#E91coAuaEfpHr0IG.99

Exposed! US Navy's 'NCIS' Caught Spying On the Entire State of Washington!

http://egyptwindow.net/news_Details.aspx?News_ID=6183

http://egyptwindow.net/news_Details.aspx?News_ID=6183

Three Afghan Military Officers Go Missing in US

Sep 21, 2014, 8:28 PM ET

Three Afghan military officers have gone missing while in the United States for a joint military training exercise at Joint Base Cape Cod, U.S. military and law enforcement officials said.

They arrived in the country on Sept. 11, and were reported missing by base security personnel late Saturday. They were last seen at the Cape Cod Mall in Hyannis, Mass.

A Centcom official told ABC News there is no indication that the Afghan men reported missing pose any threat to the public.

Base and local police and state authorities are working together to locate the three Afghans. There are still approximately a dozen Afghan soldiers still participating in the exercise, which ends Sep. 24th.

Massachusetts State Police spokesman David Procopio said the investigation is being run by the FBI and the Department of Justice, but Massachusetts state troopers are assisting in "putting the word out" and searching the area around Camp Edwards.

Just last weekend, two Afghan policemen in the Washington, D.C., for a DEA training program at Quantico, Va., also went missing while on a sightseeing trip to Georgetown.

The two men, who were part of a group of 31 Afghan police officers in the U.S. for the multi-week program, were found safe somewhere outside of D.C., but officials would not say exactly where, ABC affiliate WJLA-TV reported.

According to WJLA-TV, the DEA said the two men left the group because they did not want to go back to Afghanistan.

Y LINDA BENTLEY  |  SEPTEMBER 3, 2014

Obama and brother named in RICO complaint

Klayman accuses defendants of “laundering U.S. dollars” through HAMAS to attack Israel, Americans and Israeli-American citizens

WASHINGTON – Last Thursday, Attorney Larry Klayman (l), founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, filed a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, naming President Barack Obama, his half-brother Malik Obama (an officer of the Barack H. Obama Foundation), Secretary of State John Kerry, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and HAMAS (in Arabic, an acronym for “Harakat Al-Muqawama Al-Islamia” – Islamic Resistance Movement) as the government of Gaza, Palestinian Authority.

Klayman, who recently won a preliminary ruling in another case against the Obama administration, holding the National Security Agency’s spying on Americans is likely unconstitutional, is accusing defendants of “laundering U.S. dollars” through HAMAS, officially designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. government, for the purchase of rockets and to construct tunnels for the purpose of attacking Israel and terrorizing and killing American and dual American-Israeli citizens in Israel.

Klayman stated, “The nation and the world have increasingly come to see that Obama views himself primarily as a Muslim and acts accordingly in favoring Islamic interests over Judeo-Christian ones, and the complaint lays out Obama’s history in documented detail.”

The complaint alleges defendants have engaged in fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, conversion and corruption.

Klayman was in Israel when HAMAS attacked and said he was subject to terrorist threats, fear, intimidation and blackmail from HAMAS, aimed at coercing him from exercising his legal rights in violation of the Hobbs Act in an attempt to deny his freedom to travel and conduct public advocacy, business and other activities in Israel, using threats and intimidation to try to get Klayman to leave Israel and disengage with Israel.

The complaint alleges the defendants conspired to send hundreds of millions of dollars to HAMAS under the pretense the financial support would be used for humanitarian purposes.

It was recently confirmed, however, by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) that some of those U.S. dollars were found in the bombed chief HAMAS financial officer’s car have fallen into the hands of HAMAS’ terrorist arm, elected by the citizens of Gaza to govern them.

According to the complaint, just seven months before the Benghazi attacks, Clinton asked Congress to authorize a $770 million “slush fund,” which she called “The Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund,” to be used at her discretion anywhere in North Africa or the Middle East.

Clinton insisted the funds be “flexible and easily employed” without providing any specifics as to how the money would be used.

Clinton then caused the money from that slush fund to flow to both HAMAS and the Muslim Brotherhood with the knowledge those funds would be used to buy arms and other military equipment to be used against Israel, Jews and Christians.

Klayman alleges the State Department has not provided any official report or account of how that money was used.

The complaint states, “On information and belief, Hillary Clinton directed that activities at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and nearby CIA Annex to transfer weapons previously poured into Libya and liberated from the Libyan military to Muslim Brotherhood groups in the Middle East, including in Syria (to what is now ISIS / ISIL) and HAMAS in Gaza.”

Klayman states in his complaint that HAMAS and the Muslim Brotherhood, HAMAS’ umbrella parent organization, are “agenda driven,” seeking to achieve their own self-initiated political and territorial goals, rather than “grievance driven” in response to actions by other nations or groups, despite their efforts to use grievences in their propaganda.

He notes the charter of HAMAS calls for the destruction of Israel and the establishment of an Islamic state in place of Israel.

Klayman alleges HAMAS asked defendants for and received funds and other support from the United States of America under the apparent guise it was for humanitarian aid for the people living in Gaza but used those funds instead to finance and carry out its pattern and practice of violent crimes, murder and terrorism.

The lawsuit documents the founding of HAMAS in late 1987 by the late Sheik Ahmad Yasinat as part of the first Palestinian Intifada (uprising) to replace the Palestinian Liberation Organization with a more radical, militant alternative and stated HAMAS is a Palestinian branch of the worldwide Muslim Brotherhood.

Quoting from various sources, Klayman also states HAMAS is not seeking to co-exist and compromise; it is willing to sacrifice as many Palestinian lives as it takes to achieve its goal of conquering the globe and building an Islamic state on every inch of the globe.

Destruction of Israel is not its final goal. The final goal is to build an Islamic caliphate by wiping out all other civilizations.

Klayman states it is unknown whether the president has given Malik Obama permission to use his name but also said no effort has been made by the president to discourage the authority of Malik Obama to be raising funds under the name of the Barack H. Obama Foundation.

Klayman points out he could have run the Malik Obama Foundation but didn’t, thus he is leading people to believe his efforts are sanctioned by his brother, the president of the United States.

Malik received an IRS determination letter dated June 11, 2011, granting him retroactive tax-exempt status, but only after it became public he had been operating as a 501(c) 3 foundation since 2008 without ever applying to the IRS.

According to the complaint, “Defendant Malik Obama raises funding and other support both through the Barack H. Obama Foundation and through other organizations to facilitate violence, terrorism, and warfare carried out by HAMAS as a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood and by the Muslim Brotherhood generally.”

Klayman states two leaked classified documents reveal Egyptian security forces have been monitoring Malik Obama’s activities, while also implicating President Obama, Clinton and her husband, former president Bill Clinton in the aiding and abetting of terrorists.

A photo of Malik Obama at a conference in Yemen in 2010, shows him wearing a scarf displaying the slogan, “Jerusalem is ours – We are coming.”

This would lead one to believe Malik Obama specifically supports the goal of Muslim occupation and possession of Jerusalem while supporting HAMAS violence as a means of taking Jerusalem from the Jews and Israel for the benefit of HAMAS.

Klayman accuses the defendants of providing material support to the preparation and carrying out of numerous acts of international terrorism and as a result of such support to terrorist groups, they have violated the law of nations, established U.S. law, international laws, treaties and norms.

Klayman is seeking an award in excess of $500 million or $1.5 billion in trebled damages, punitive damages and other relief the court may deem just and proper.