Counterterrorism Czar: Every U.S. Company Has Been Infiltrated by Communist China

‘Counterterrorism Czar’ Says Every U.S. Company Has Been Infiltrated by China

Richard Clarke claims every U.S. company has been penetrated by the Chinese. (Photo: Khue Bui via Smithsonian)

The April issue of Smithsonian Magazine focuses on Richard Clarke, a man who has served as the “counterterrorism czar” under three presidential administrations. In the feature, Clarke makes some strong claims, the most notable of which are that every U.S. company has been penetrated by China through cyberspace and remains vulnerable to attack, and that the United States made and launched the infamous Stuxnet worm.

Clarke, who is famously known for warning the White House to expect a “spectacular attack on American soil” from Al Qaeda and after 9/11 said “Your government failed you,” is now issuing another warning. Ron Rosenbaum for Smithsonian writes:

Clarke now wants to warn us, urgently, that we are being failed again, being left defenseless against a cyberattack that could bring down our nation’s entire electronic infrastructure, including the power grid, banking and telecommunications, and even our military command system.

“Are we as a nation living in denial about the danger we’re in?” I asked Clarke as we sat across a conference table in his office suite.

“I think we’re living in the world of non-response. Where you know that there’s a problem, but you don’t do anything about it. If that’s denial, then that’s denial.”

Who is it we should be most afraid of when it comes to cyber attacks? According to Clarke: China. He said that the countless amount of electronic material imported by the U.S. from China could be implanted with “‘logic bombs,’ trapdoors and ‘Trojan horses’”:

“I’m about to say something that people think is an exaggeration, but I think the evidence is pretty strong,” he tells me. “Every major company in the United States has already been penetrated by China.”

(Related: Oops: China accidentally broadcasts evidence of cyberwar against the U.S.)

Clarke’s greatest fear is not a virtual takedown but that the U.S. will lose its competitiveness through these bugs:

“[...] rather than having a cyber-Pearl Harbor event, we will instead have this death of a thousand cuts. Where we lose our competitiveness by having all of our research and development stolen by the Chinese. And we never really see the single event that makes us do something about it. That it’s always just below our pain threshold. That company after company in the United States spends millions, hundreds of millions, in some cases billions of dollars on R&D and that information goes free to China….After a while you can’t compete.”

(Related: Security company: China linked to cyber attacks on 48 chemical and defense companies)

Smithsonian also reports Clarke as attributing the creation and deployment of the Stuxnet worm, which foiled some of Iran’s nuclear program, to U.S. officials with some minor role played by Israel. When Rosenbaum asked the White House for a comment on this accusation, it said “[...] we don’t comment on classified intelligence matters.” Rosenbaum takes this as not a denial. But what is some of Clarke’s reasoning for pointing a finger at the U.S. for the worm? Smithsonian has more:

One reason to believe the Stuxnet attack was made in the USA, Clarke says, “was that it very much had the feel to it of having been written by or governed by a team of Washington lawyers.”

“What makes you say that?” I asked.

“Well, first of all, I’ve sat through a lot of meetings with Washington [government/Pentagon/CIA/NSA-type] lawyers going over covert action proposals. And I know what lawyers do.

“The lawyers want to make sure that they very much limit the effects of the action. So that there’s no collateral damage.” He is referring to legal concerns about the Law of Armed Conflict, an international code designed to minimize civilian casualties that U.S. government lawyers seek to follow in most cases.

Gizmodo states that Clarke could very well be exaggerating some of his claims. Clarke did recently publish a book called “Cyber War”, which covers much of what is included in the Smithsonian interview in more detail. Business Insider also points out that Clarke, who served in government intelligence for more than 30 years before starting his own security firm in Virginia, could be trying to boost his business with some of these accusations, but it states “why wouldn’t China do this to give itself the advantage in a face-off with the U.S. military?” Good question. It also shouldn’t be forgotten that Clarke correctly predicted the attacks that occurred on 9/11.

Rosenbaum’s interview with Clarke was lengthy and there are even more details in the magazine. Read more here.

Communist China Helping Communist N. Korea with ICBMs that can Strike USA

Congressman alleges China helping North Korea with ICBMs

Posted By Josh Rogin Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - 4:56 PM Share

China may be helping North Korea develop long range ballistic missiles that could reach the United States, and one Republican congressman wants the Obama administration to do something about it.
"As you have likely seen, the press is reporting that North Korea unveiled a new mobile missile at a military parade in Pyongyang in honor of the founder of that dictatorship, Kim Il Sung," Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH), wrote in an April 17 letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, obtained by The Cable. Turner is the Chairman of the House Armed Services Strategic Forces subcommittee.
"Whether this missile is the new road mobile intercontinental missile (ICBM) the administration has been warning about is, as yet, unclear based on these public reports," Turner wrote. "Of deeper concern, however, are allegations that the missile, unveiled at the recent military parade in Pyongyang, is based on Chinese technology, in violation of international obligations and a threat to the national security interest of the United States."
Turner wrote that the photographs of the missile "suggest cooperation and support" by the Chinese government and he quotes missile-technology expert Richard Fisher as saying that the 16-wheel transporter-erector-launcher (TEL) was "very likely" a Chinese design and that there was a "possibility" it was actually manufactured in China for North Korea's use.
Turner asked Clinton and Clapper to report back to Congress if the U.S. government has any evidence that China or Chinese companies are helping North Korea acquires mobile launchers for ICBMs. He also wants to know whether the administration has done anything to confront China on the issue, whether the administration believes China is helping North Korea with ballistic missiles at all, and whether the administration will sanction Chinese entities for aiding the North Korean missile program.
"Indeed, the possibility of such cooperation undermines the administration's entire policy of investing China with the responsibility of getting tough on North Korea," Turner wrote.

Chinese Cities Coming to America

Chinese Cities Coming to America

• 
• 

Published on Thursday, 10 May 2012 10:06

Written by American Dream

Tweet

A Chinese Group Plans To Construct A 200 Acre "China City" In Michigan

A Chinese group known as "Sino-Michigan Properties LLC" has bought up 200 acres of land near the town of Milan, Michigan.  Their plan is to construct a "China City" with artificial lakes, a Chinese cultural center and hundreds of housing units for Chinese citizens.  Essentially, it would be a little slice of communist China dropped right into the heartland of America.

This "China City" would be located about 40 minutes from both Detroit and Toledo, and it would be marketed to Chinese business people that want to start businesses in the United States.  Unfortunately, this is not just an isolated incident.  In fact, Chinese companies have been buying up land and businesses all over the country in recent years.  There has even been talk of establishing "special economic zones" inside the United States modeled after the Chinese city of Shenzhen.  It was inevitable that the Chinese were going to do something with the trillions of dollars that they have made flooding our shores with cheap products.  Now they are rapidly buying up pieces of America, and many of our politicians are welcoming them with open arms.

The town of Milan, Michigan is a small farming community of only about 6,000 people, but big changes are coming their way.  The following is from a recent Dayton Daily News article about this new project....

A group of mainland Chinese known as Sino-Michigan Properties LLC paid $1.9 million for 200 acres of farmland on Milan city limits in purchases this year and in 2011, according to local officials and property records.

Unfortunately, the goal does not appear to be to integrate this new "city" into the existing community in and around Milan.

Rather, it appears that all of the new housing will be sold to people coming over from China.  According to the Milan News Leader newspaper, the new housing units "would be marketed to Chinese business people who want to start companies in the United States".

In essence, we would be looking at a new Chinese city right in the middle of Michigan.

Doug Smith, senior vice president for business and community development for the Michigan Economic Development Corp., recently said the followingabout what the Chinese group plans to do....

"It’s a group that wants to build a China city, starting with housing over there in Milan"

Milan is not far from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, which is a very popular destination for Chinese students.  Apparently that is one reason why Milan was chosen.

This new project would be a Chinese community built by Chinese and specifically designed for Chinese.

But isn't this supposed to be America?

Fortunately, the project does not have final approval yet.  It still must be approved by the two townships outside of Milan where the land is located.

For some reason, the Chinese seem to be particularly interested in this area of the country.

For example, a different Chinese investment group has been busy buying up chunks of real estate over in nearby Toledo, Ohio.  The following is from an article in the Toledo Blade on May 26th, 2011....

Dashing Pacific Group Ltd., which has already purchased the nearby Docks restaurant complex for $2.15 million, put its $3.8 million offer to buy the southern 69 acres at the Marina District in East Toledo back on the table for approval by Toledo City Council. Additionally, Dashing Pacific Chairman Yuan Xiaohong, in a letter signed in Hangzhou, said the firm wants a two-year option to buy the decommissioned Toledo Edison power plant property on the site.

So should we be alarmed that the Chinese are buying up pieces of America?

Well, if they simply wanted to enjoy living in America and wanted to integrate into the wider community that would be one thing.

But it is another thing altogether to start dropping slices of communist China inside of U.S. territory.

In a previous article entitled "China Wants To Construct A 50 Square Mile Self-Sustaining City South Of Boise, Idaho", I discussed a potential deal that Sinomach (a company controlled by the Chinese government) was exploring with the government of Idaho.  The following is a description of that potential project from an article in the Idaho Statesman....

A Chinese national company is interested in developing a 10,000- to 30,000-acre technology zone for industry, retail centers and homes south of the Boise Airport.

There was talk that this "technology zone" would be modeled after the "special economic zones" that have been developed in China.  The city of Shenzhen is perhaps the most famous example of this.

Fortunately that deal appears to have stalled, but other mammoth deals have been moving forward in other parts of the country.

For example, the Chinese have been very busy gobbling up oil and gas fields.  The following is a quote from a local Texas news source about a deal that a company owned by the Chinese government did with Chesapeake Energy down in Texas....

State-owned Chinese energy giant CNOOC is buying a multibillion-dollar stake in 600,000 acres of South Texas oil and gas fields, potentially testing the political waters for further expansion into U.S. energy reserves.

With the announcement Monday that it would pay up to $2.2 billion for a one-third stake in Chesapeake Energy assets, CNOOC lays claim to a share of properties that eventually could produce up to half a million barrels a day of oil equivalent.

You can read more about that particular deal right here.

So is it really a good idea to be allowing the Chinese to buy up our precious energy resources?

The answer to that question is obvious.

Sadly, the examples noted above are not isolated incidents.  The truth is that the Chinese have been snapping up real estate and business assets all over America as a recent Forbes article explained....

According to a recent report in the New York Times, investors from China are “snapping up luxury apartments” and are planning to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on commercial and residential projects like Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn. Chinese companies also have signed major leases at the Empire State Building and at 1 World Trade Center, the report said.

So get ready - the Chinese are buying up U.S. land and they are moving in whether you like it or not.

So what will the long-term consequences be of allowing a communist superpower to buy up large sections of America?

That is a very good question.

Source: American Dream

Why Is The Obama Administration Allowing The Chinese Government To Buy Up U.S. Oil And Gas Deposits Worth Billions Of Dollars?

By Michael, on May 13th, 2012

If we are trying to become independent of foreign oil, then why is the Obama administration allowing the Chinese government to buy up U.S. oil and gas deposits worth billions of dollars?  This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.  The United States desperately needs to maintain control over its own domestic energy resources so that we can end our addiction to foreign oil.  As I have written about previously, the United States actually has plenty of oil.  If we would simply use the resources that we already have, we would never have to import a single drop of foreign oil.  But instead, we continue to be the largest importer of oil on the planet and we are allowing China to rapidly buy up oil and gas deposits inside the United States.  This is fundamentally wrong and it is a serious threat to our national security.  But apparently everything is for sale in the United States today, and that includes our precious energy resources.
The Chinese government is using two giant corporations to buy up these energy resources.
The first is the China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC).  According to Wikipedia, this corporation is 100 percent owned by the Chinese government….

CNOOC Group is a state-owned oil company, fully owned by the Government of the People’s Republic of China, and the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) performs the rights and obligations of shareholder on behalf of the government.

The second is Sinopec Corporation.  Sinopec Group is the largest shareholder (about 75% of the shares) in Sinopec Corporation.  And as the Sinopec website tells us, Sinopec Group is owned by the Chinese government….

Sinopec Group, the largest shareholder of Sinopec Corp., is a super-large petroleum and petrochemical group incorporated by the State in 1998 based on the former China Petrochemical Corporation. Funded by the State, it is a State authorized investment arm and State-owned controlling company.

So wherever you see CNOOC or Sinopec you can replace those names with the Chinese government.  The Chinese government essentially runs both of those companies.
And both companies have been very busy buying up U.S. oil and gas deposits.
For example, CNOOC recently completed a 570 million dollar deal that gives it a one-third interest in huge oil and gas deposits in Colorado and Wyoming.  The following is from Wyoming Energy News….

Chinese energy company Cnooc Ltd. has agreed to pay $570 million for a one-third interest in Chesapeake Energy Corp.’s 800,000 leased acres in northeast Colorado and southeast Wyoming. The acreage is in the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) and Powder River basins. Cnooc is China’s biggest offshore oil and natural gas producer.

In fact, according to a recent Business Insider article, this deal gives the Chinese government the right to a third of any new oil discovered by Chesapeake Energy in the entire region….

The Niobrara Shale formation stretches over Colorado and Wyoming, as well as Kansas and Nebraska. Chesapeake Energy’s position is in Wyoming and Colorado. If Chesapeake find any more oil in this region, CNOOC has the rights to 33.3% of what is found.

But this is not the only area of the country where China now owns energy rights.  The following is an excerpt from a recent state-by-state breakdown that appeared in the Wall Street Journal….

Louisiana: Sinopec has a one-third interest in 265,000 acres in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale after a broader $2.5-billion deal with Devon Energy.
Michigan: Sinopec gained a one-third interest in 350,000 acres in a larger $2.5 billion deal with Devon Energy.
Ohio: Sinopec acquired a one-third stake in Devon Energy’s 235,000 Utica Shale acres in a larger $2.5 billion deal.
Oklahoma: Sinopec has a one-third interest in 215,000 acres in a broader $2.5 billion deal with Devon Energy.
Texas: Cnooc acquired a one-third interest in Chesapeake Energy’s 600,000 acres in the Eagle Ford Shale in a $2.16-billion deal.

The Texas deal was particularly noteworthy.  The following is how a San Antonio news source described that deal….

State-owned Chinese energy giant CNOOC is buying a multibillion-dollar stake in 600,000 acres of South Texas oil and gas fields, potentially testing the political waters for further expansion into U.S. energy reserves.
With the announcement Monday that it would pay up to $2.2 billion for a one-third stake in Chesapeake Energy assets, CNOOC lays claim to a share of properties that eventually could produce up to half a million barrels a day of oil equivalent.

So why is the Obama administration allowing this to happen?
Are they so desperate to have China continue lending money to the United States that they would allow the Chinese government to pillage our precious energy resources?
Somebody needs to be asking our politicians that question.
But oil and gas are not the only U.S. assets that the Chinese have been buying up.
In a previous article, I detailed how the Chinese have been purchasing huge chunks of real estate all over the country as well.
For example, a recent Forbes article detailed some of the real estate deals that China has been doing in New York….

According to a recent report in the New York Times, investors from China are “snapping up luxury apartments” and are planning to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on commercial and residential projects like Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn. Chinese companies also have signed major leases at the Empire State Building and at 1 World Trade Center, the report said.

In addition, it was recently announced that the Federal Reserve will now allow Chinese banks to buy up American banks.
Where will all of this end?
Should all of us start learning to speak Chinese?
Meanwhile, our trade deficit with China continues to get even larger.  Our trade deficit with China last year was $295.5 billion, which was the largest trade deficit that one country has had with another country in the history of the world.  This year, we are already on a pace to break that record.
So thousands of businesses, millions of jobs and hundreds of billions of dollars will continue to leave the United States and go to China.
And China will continue to use some of the money they are getting from us to buy up pieces of America.
Does anyone else out there see something very, very wrong with all of this?

LT Governor Mike Darr: Makes Arkansas Gun-Permit Records Private Under New Law, In A Rare Maneuver

LT Governor Mike Darr: Makes Arkansas Gun-Permit Records Private Under New Law, In A Rare Maneuver

Saturday, February 23, 2013 21:41

inShare

0

(Before It's News)

While Governor Mike Beebe was away attending a National Governors Association meeting in Washington.,  Lieutenant Governor Mark Darr,  a Republican, Signed into law a bill that would Exempt  public disclosure of the names and zip codes of gun owners, those with permits to carry concealed weapons and applicants for gun permits.

In a rare maneuver allowed under Arkansas law, Lieutenant Governor Mark Darr, a Republican, signed the bill into law while Democratic Governor Mike Beebe was attending a National Governors Association meeting in Washington over the weekend.
Darr signed Senate Bill 131 by Sen. Bruce Holland, R-Greenwood, which exempts the names and zip codes of concealed weapon permit holders and applicants from the state Freedom of Information Act. The bill is now Act 145.

Darr was acting governor Friday while Beebe was in Washington for a weekend meeting of the National Governors Association. Beebe is scheduled to be back in the state Monday.

Beebe had said he had no plans to veto the bill but planned to let it become law without his signature. The bill will become law Monday.

Darr said Friday he felt there was an immediate need to sign the bill. “Having been an outspoken advocate for Second Amendment rights, I felt passionately that there should be no delays in signing this bill into law,” Darr said in a news release.

“Within the bill is an emergency clause which states that once this bill is signed the state of Arkansas can no longer publicly release records concerning persons licensed to carry a concealed handgun or those applying for such a license,” Darr said. “The release of such records is an invasion of privacy and threatens the safety and property of the persons identified.”

This is a huge victory for the gun owners of Arkansas. Thank you Mike Darr.

Exclusive: U.S. lets China bypass Wall Street for Treasury orders

By Emily Flitter

NEW YORK | Mon May 21, 2012 3:35pm EDT

(Reuters) - China can now bypass Wall Street when buying U.S. government debt and go straight to the U.S. Treasury, in what is the Treasury's first-ever direct relationship with a foreign government, according to documents viewed by Reuters.
The relationship means the People's Bank of China buys U.S. debt using a different method than any other central bank in the world.

 

 

The other central banks, including the Bank of Japan, which has a large appetite for Treasuries, place orders for U.S. debt with major Wall Street banks designated by the government as primary dealers. Those dealers then bid on their behalf at Treasury auctions.
China, which holds $1.17 trillion in U.S. Treasuries, still buys some Treasuries through primary dealers, but since June 2011, that route hasn't been necessary.
The documents viewed by Reuters show the U.S. Treasury Department has given the People's Bank of China a direct computer link to its auction system, which the Chinese first used to buy two-year notes in late June 2011.
China can now participate in auctions without placing bids through primary dealers. If it wants to sell, however, it still has to go through the market.
The change was not announced publicly or in any message to primary dealers.
"Direct bidding is open to a wide range of investors, but as a matter of general policy we do not comment on individual bidders," said Matt Anderson, a Treasury Department spokesman.
While there is been no prohibition on foreign government entities bidding directly, the Treasury's accommodation of China is unique.
The Treasury's sales of U.S. debt to China have become part of a politically charged public debate about China's role as the largest exporter to the United States and also the country's largest creditor.
The privilege may help China obtain U.S. debt for a better price by keeping Wall Street's knowledge of its orders to a minimum.
Primary dealers are not allowed to charge customers money to bid on their behalf at Treasury auctions, so China isn't saving money by cutting out commission fees.
Instead, China is preserving the value of specific information about its bidding habits. By bidding directly, China prevents Wall Street banks from trying to exploit its huge presence in a given auction by driving up the price.
It is one of several courtesies provided to a buyer in a class by itself in terms of purchasing power. Although the Japanese, for example, own about $1.1 trillion of Treasuries, their purchasing has been less centralized. Buying by Japan is scattered among institutions, including pension funds, large Japanese banks and the Bank of Japan, without a single entity dominating.
Granting China a direct bidding link is not the first time Treasury has gone to great lengths to keep its largest client happy.
In 2009, when Treasury officials found China was using special deals with primary dealers to conceal its U.S. debt purchases, the Treasury changed a rule to outlaw those deals, Reuters reported last June. But at the same time it relaxed a reporting requirement to make the Chinese more comfortable with the amended rule.
Another feature of the U.S.-China business relationship is discretion: The Treasury tried to keep its motivation for the 2009 rule change under wraps, Reuters reported.
Documents dealing with China's new status as a direct bidder again demonstrate the Treasury's desire for secrecy -- in terms of Wall Street and its new direct bidding customer.
To safeguard against hackers, Treasury officials upgraded the system that allows China to access the bidding process.
Then they discussed ways to deflect questions from Wall Street traders that would arise once the auction results began revealing the undeniable presence of a foreign direct bidder.
"Most hold the view that foreign accounts only submit 'indirect bids' through primary dealers. This will likely cause significant chatter on the street and many questions will likely come our way," wrote one government official in an email viewed by Reuters.
In the email, the official suggested providing basic, general answers to questions about who can bid in Treasury actions.
"For questions more extensive or probing in nature, I think it prudent to direct them to the or Treasury public relations area," the official wrote.
The granting to China of direct bidder status may be controversial because some government officials are concerned that China has gained too much leverage over the United States through its large Treasury holdings.
For example, economist Brad Setser, who is a member of the National Economic Council and has also served on the National Security Council, has argued China's large Treasury holdings pose a national security threat.
Writing for the Council on Foreign Relations in 2009, Setser posited that China's massive U.S. debt holdings gave it power over U.S. policy via the threat of a swift, large sale of U.S. debt that could send the market into turmoil and drive up interest rates.
But Treasury officials have long maintained that U.S. debt sales to China are kept separate from politics in a business relationship that benefits both countries. The Chinese use Treasuries to house the dollars they receive from selling goods to the United States, while the U.S. government is happy to see such strong demand for its debt because it keeps interest rates low.
A spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Washington did not respond to calls and emails seeking comment.
The United States has, however, displayed increasing anxiety about China as a cybersecurity threat. The change Treasury officials made to their direct bidding system before allowing access to China was to limit access to the system to a specially designed private network connection controlled by the Treasury.
China is among the most sensitive topics for bankers and government officials who court the country as a financial client because of its size and importance, and none would agree to comment on the record for this story.
A former debt management official at the Treasury who did not want to be identified said that as China's experience in the U.S. Treasury market has deepened over time, Chinese officials may have felt more comfortable taking the reins in the management of their holdings.
Their request to bid directly, in his view, came from a confidence that their money managers could buy U.S. debt more efficiently on their own than through Wall Street banks, which can often drive up the price of Treasuries at an auction if they know how much large clients are willing to pay. Such a practice that is not specifically illegal, though most traders would deem it unethical.
Evidence of China's growing sophistication as a money manager in the U.S. markets is clear in its expansion of operations in New York. Its money management arm, the State Administration for Foreign Exchange (commonly called SAFE), has an office in Midtown Manhattan and a seasoned chief investment officer -- former Pacific Investment Management Co derivatives head Changhong Zhu -- in Beijing.
A woman who answered the phone at SAFE's New York office said no one in the office was authorized to talk to the media.
(Editing by Martin Howell and Steve Orlofsky)

Lawmakers “Accidentally” Legalize Warrantless Invasion Of Gun Owners’ Homes.

Lawmakers “Accidentally” Legalize Warrantless Invasion Of Gun Owners’ Homes.

Lawmakers “Accidentally” Legalize Warrantless Invasion Of Gun Owners’ Homes.
(WesternJournalism).

Lawmakers in Washington State have accidentally written a bill permitting police to invade private homes for the purpose of confiscating “illegal” guns and accessories, such as magazines that hold over 10 rounds.

According to Senate Bill 5737, introduced on February 13th by Democrat State Senators Murray, Kohl-Welles, and Kline, no one may possess an “assault weapon” or the combination of a semi-automatic pistol or rifle capable of using a detachable magazine AND any magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds of ammo.

Happily, however, you ARE allowed to possess an UNLOADED assault weapon “…for the purpose of permanently relinquishing it to a law enforcement agency of the state.” (Pg. 6)

Naturally, the statute would NOT apply to police, members of law enforcement in the state, or to federal authorities; in short, the oft-referred to “only ones.” That is, the only ones, the political ruling class tells us, who can be trusted with firearms. However, if one happens to own an “assault weapon” prior to the effective date of the legislation, he may keep it IF he agrees to “safely and securely store the assault weapon.” And by the way, “THE SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY MAY, NO MORE THAN ONCE PER YEAR, CONDUCT AN INSPECTION TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE…” Not surprisingly, safe and secure storage is not defined in the bill. (Pg. 7) Also not surprisingly, this language was quickly deleted from the bill immediately upon lawmakers learning of the public outrage their little foray into dictatorship had spawned.

Yet, in order to provide cover for the bill’s sponsors and fellow liberals, duplicitous “journalist” Danny Westneat is hoping to sell Washington gun owners on the laughable story that the whole thing was just an unfortunate mistake! According to Westneat, one of the bill’s sponsors, Democrat Adam Kline “…did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on.” Naturally, ALL prospective laws should be written without paying much attention to what’s in them! And the PRIME sponsor, Democrat Ed Murray, admitted that the language was “probably unconstitutional.” “I have to admit that shouldn’t be in there,” allowed the munificent liberal.

PROBABLY unconstitutional? Here is the 4th Amendment to the Constitution:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

And by the way, MR. Murray, how were your “only ones” to know which homes to enter and search? Could it be that mandatory, statewide gun registration was to become the next in your series of “common sense” gun laws?

But even with the Orwellian language now removed, SB 5737 is an affront to the God-given rights of the American people. After all, the bill still states that, should one inherit an “assault weapon,” he must either dispose of it by allowing law enforcement to confiscate it or permanently disable it. It is government literally authorizing the theft or destruction of personal property. Anyone who objects will be subject to one year in prison.

As for the claim by the bill’s authors that it was a mistake, a misstep? “It’s a “misstep” because they said what they want to do. They gave away what their plan is.” The truth is, “it’s not a misstep, it’s the next step.”Read the full story here.

Every human emotion now classified as a mental disorder in new psychiatric manual DSM-5

Every human emotion now classified as a mental disorder in new psychiatric manual DSM-5

The industry of modern psychiatry has officially gone insane. Virtually every emotion experienced by a human being -- sadness, grief, anxiety, frustration, impatience, excitement -- is now being classified as a "mental disorder" demanding chemical treatment (with prescription medications, of course).

The new, upcoming DSM-5 "psychiatry bible," expected to be released in a few months, has transformed itself from a medical reference manual to a testament to the insanity of the industry itself.

"Mental disorders" named in the DSM-5 include "General Anxiety Disorder" or GAD for short. GAD can be diagnosed in a person who feels a little anxious doing something like, say, talking to a psychiatrist. Thus, the mere act of a psychiatrist engaging in the possibility of making a diagnoses causes the "symptoms" of that diagnoses to magically appear.

This is called quack science and circular reasoning, yet it's indicative of the entire industry of psychiatry which has become such a laughing stock among scientific circles that even the science skeptics are starting to turn their backs in disgust. Psychiatry is no more "scientific" than astrology or palm reading, yet its practitioners call themselves "doctors" of psychiatry in order to try to make quackery sound credible.

How modern psychiatry really works

Here's how modern psychiatry really operates: A bunch of self-important, overpaid intellectuals who want to make more money invent a fabricated disease that I'll call "Hoogala Boogala Disorder" or HBD.

By a show of hands, they then vote into existence whatever "symptoms" they wish to associated with Hoogala Boogala Disorder. In this case, the symptoms might be spontaneous singing or wanting to pick your nose from time to time.

They then convince teachers, journalists and government regulators that Hoogala Boogala Disorder is real -- and more importantly that millions of children suffer from it! It wouldn't be compassionate not to offer all those children treatment, would it?

Thus begins the call for "treatment" for a completely fabricated disease. From there, it's a cinch to get Big Pharma to fabricate whatever scientific data they need in order to "prove" that speed, amphetamines, pharmaceutical crack or whatever poison they want to sell "reduces the risk of Hoogala Boogala Disorder."

Serious-sounding psychiatrists -- who are all laughing their asses off in the back room -- then "diagnose" children with Hoogala Boogala Disorder and "prescribe" the prescription drugs that claim to treat it. For this action, these psychiatrists -- who are, let's just admit it, dangerous child predators -- earn financial kickbacks from Big Pharma.

In order to maximize their kickbacks and Big Pharma freebies, groups of these psychiatrists get together every few years and invent more fictitious disorders, expanding their fictional tome called the DSM.

The DSM is now larger than ever, and it includes disorders such as "Obedience Defiance Disorder" (ODD), defined as refusing to lick boots and follow false authority. Rapists who feel sexual arousal during their raping activities are given the excuse that they have "Paraphilic coercive disorder" and therefore are not responsible for their actions. (But they will need medication, of course!)

You can also get diagnosed with "Hoarding Disorder" if you happen to stockpile food, water and ammunition, among other things. Yep, being prepared for possible natural disasters now makes you a mental patient in the eyes of modern psychiatry (and the government, too).

Former DSM chairperson apologizes for creating "false epidemics"

Allen Frances chaired the DSM-IV that was released in 1994. He now admits it was a huge mistake that has resulted in the mass overdiagnosis of people who are actually quite normal. The DSM-IV "...inadvertently contributed to three false epidemics -- attention deficit disorder, autism and childhood bipolar disorder," writes Allen in an LA Times opinion piece.

He goes on to say:

The first draft of the next edition of the DSM ... is filled with suggestions that would multiply our mistakes and extend the reach of psychiatry dramatically deeper into the ever-shrinking domain of the normal. This wholesale medical imperialization of normality could potentially create tens of millions of innocent bystanders who would be mislabeled as having a mental disorder. The pharmaceutical industry would have a field day -- despite the lack of solid evidence of any effective treatments for these newly proposed diagnoses.

All these fabricated disorders, of course, result in a ballooning number of false positive. As Allen writes:

The "psychosis risk syndrome" would use the presence of strange thinking to predict who would later have a full-blown psychotic episode. But the prediction would be wrong at least three or four times for every time it is correct -- and many misidentified teenagers would receive medications that can cause enormous weight gain, diabetes and shortened life expectancy.

But that's the whole point of psychiatry: To prescribe drugs to people who don't need them. This is accomplished almost entirely by diagnosing people with disorders that don't exist.

And it culminates in psychiatrists being paid money they never earned (and certainly don't deserve.)

Imagine: An entire industry invented out of nothing! And yes, you do have to imagine it because nothing inside the industry is actually real.

What's "normal" in psychiatry? Being an emotionless zombie

The only way to be "normal" when being observed or "diagnosed" by a psychiatrist -- a process that is entirely subjective and completely devoid of anything resembling actual science -- is to exhibit absolutely no emotions or behavior whatsoever.

A person in a coma is a "normal" person, according to the DSM, because they don't exhibit any symptoms that might indicate the presence of those God-awful things called emotions or behavior.

A person in a grave is also "normal" according to psychiatry, mostly because dead people do not qualify for Medicare reimbursement and therefore aren't worth diagnosing or medicating. (But if Medicare did cover deceased patients, then by God you'd see psychiatrists lining up at all the cemeteries to medicate corpses!)

It's all a cruel, complete hoax. Psychiatry should be utterly abolished right now and all children being put on mind-altering drugs should be taken off of them and given good nutrition instead.

When the collapse of America comes and the new society rises up out of it, I am going to push hard for the complete abolition of psychiatric "medicine" if you can even call it that. Virtually the entire industry is run by truly mad, power-hungry maniacs who use their power to victimize children (and adults, too). There is NO place in society for distorted psychiatry based on fabricated disorders. The whole operation needs to be shut down, disbanded and outlawed.

The lost notion of normalcy

Here are some simple truths that need to be reasserted when we abolish the quack science industry of psychiatry:

Normalcy is not achieved through medication. Normalcy is not the absence of a range of emotion. Life necessarily involves emotions, experiences and behaviors which, from time to time, step outside the bounds of the mundane. This does not mean people have a "mental disorder." It only means they are not biological robots.

Nutrition, not medication, is the answer

Nutritional deficiencies, by the way, are the root cause of nearly all "mental illness." Blood sugar imbalances cause brain malfunctions because the brain runs on blood sugar as its primary energy source. Deficiencies in zinc, selenium, chromium, magnesium and other elements cause blood sugar imbalances that result in seemingly "wild" emotions or behaviors.

Nearly everyone who has been diagnosed with a mental disorder in our modern world is actually suffering from nothing more than nutritional imbalances. Too much processed, poisonous junk food and not enough healthy superfood and nutrition. At times, they also have metals poisoning from taking too many vaccines (aluminum and mercury) or eating too much toxic food (mercury in fish, cadmium, arsenic, etc.) Vitamin D deficiency is ridiculously widespread, especially across the UK and Canada where sunlight is more difficult to achieve on a steady basis.

But the reason nutrition is never highlighted as the solution to mental disorders and illness is because the pharmaceutical industry only makes money selling chemical "treatments" for conditions that are given complicated, technical-sounding names to make them seem more real. If food and nutritional supplements can keep your brain healthy -- and believe me, they can! -- then who needs high-priced pharmaceuticals? Who needs high-priced psychiatrists? Who needs drug reps? Pill-pushing doctors? And Obamacare's mandatory health insurance money confiscation programs?

Nobody needs them! This is the simple, self-evident truth of the matter: Our society would be much happier, healthier and more productive tomorrow if the entire pharmaceutical industry and psychiatry industry simply vanished overnight.

With the DSM-5, modern-day psychiatry has made a mockery of itself. What was once viewed as maybe having some basis in science is now widely seen as hilarious quackery.

Psychiatry itself now appears to be completely insane. And that might be the first accurate diagnosis to come out of the entire group

Man with high-powered rifles and ‘tank buster’ bullets arrested for posting liberal ‘hit list’

By David Edwards
Friday, February 22, 2013 12:07 EST

Share on facebookShare on redditShare on diggShare on twitterShare on farkShare on stumbleupon362

 

Topics: facebook ♦ Larry Mulqueen ♦ Sen. Chuck Schumer

 

Police in Clarkstown, New York have confiscated a cache of high-powered weapons and body armor from a man who was arrested for posting death threats against against many Democratic politicians and every liberal supporter of President Barack Obama.
According to WCBS, 49-year-old Larry Mulqueen was arraigned on Thursday on charges of “making terroristic threats, illegally possessing weapons and harassment.”
Mulqueen’s landlady had tipped off police after she found a “hit list” posted on Facebook that threatened Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY), Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY) and all members of the Congressional Black Caucus.
The Facebook posting said that all of the president’s follower were “traitor scum” and promised “death to them all.”
Nyack-Piermont Patch reported that police searched Mulqueen’s home and found two high-powered rifles, two bayonets, a sword, a knuckle knife, body armor and ammunition. Included in the 100 rounds of ammunition were 27 so-called “tank buster” .50 caliber armor-piercing shells.
Previous criminal convictions meant that it was illegal for Mulqueen to possess the weapons.
“We didn’t want a situation where something did happen and we looked back and it was said ‘well, that law enforcement agency had information and warnings, why did they do nothing about it?” Clarkstown Police Sgt. Glenn Cummings explained to WCBS.
“I think what may have particularly have gotten his ire in the past month or two were the various legislation enacted with respect to the rights to possess a firearm. I think that was particularly upsetting to him,” Cummings added. “One posting which was posted about a month ago said that if anybody ever came to take the arms, they would suffer the consequences.”
Police said that Mulqueen would remain behind bars at least until his court appearance on Monday.
Watch this video from WCBC, broadcast Feb. 21, 2013.

Raw Story (http://s.tt/1A6FV)

• About the CDP
• Why Train @ CDP?
• News & Media
• Travel
• NLE/NSSE
• Contact Us
• CTAS
• FEMA SID

Welcome to the Center for Domestic Preparedness

New to the Site?

Select a Customer Gateway below:

• Resident Training

  Learn more about our excellent in-house course offerings.

• Course Schedules

  Calendars and listings for all in-house course offerings.

• Registration

  Begin the process of attending one of our in-house courses.

• Indirect Training

  Learn more about how you can conduct CDP classes at home.

Possible Downtime Saturday between 6:00 am and 12:00 pm CT.

You may not be able to access this site Saturday morning because of facilities maintenance. We are trying to minimize the impact to the site, but the site may be down completely or intermittently while maintenance is performed.

Train at the nation's premier all-hazards training center! FEMA’s Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP), located in Anniston, Alabama, is the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS)'s only federally chartered Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) training center.
The CDP began operations in June 1998 as the only all-hazards training center, offering training on Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive (CBRNE) weapons. While the training tempo has increased dramatically, the CDP’s training programs provide the very best in advanced hands-on training for America's emergency responders. On March 31, 2007, the Noble Training Facility (NTF) was transferred from the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) to the CDP. NTF is the only hospital facility in the United States dedicated to training hospital and healthcare professionals in disaster preparedness and response.
If you are a state, local, or tribal government emergency responder, this training is completely funded by DHS at no cost to you or your jurisdiction. We fly you into Atlanta airport, pick you up, transport you to the CDP, and provide all meals and lodging. For federal, civilian and international requests, please contact us.

Integrated Capstone Events (ICE)

The Center for Domestic Preparedness developed the ICE program as a means to combine the talents of a multi-discipline response force and have them deploy to and react to a scenario driven, CBRNE/all hazards, incident incorporating mass casualties. The objective of the event is to exercise the skills, knowledge and techniques previously learned during the weeks training then challenging the student to use those skills to respond to and mitigate a CBRNE incident. These ICE events are designed to give the student an opportunity to practice response actions, with immediate feedback, resulting in a more confident and better trained response force for the community. Any course on the training calendar with the ICE acronym will be a participant in this collective training program.

Download

Courses

• CDP Student Handbook (PDF, 1.3 Mb)
• CDP Course List (January 2013) (PDF, 503 Kb)
• CDP Fact Sheet (January 2013) (PDF, 530 Kb)
• CDP Course Title Changes List (PDF, 538 Kb)

Calendars

• Third Quarter 2013 Calendar (PDF, 218 Kb)
• Second Quarter 2013 Calendar (PDF, 216 Kb)
• Calendar RSS Feed

Newsletters

• CDP Alumnus Newsletter (2nd Quarter 2013) (PDF, 1Mb)
• CDP Alumnus Newsletter (1st Quarter 2013) (PDF, 3Mb)
• CDP Alumnus Newsletter (4th Quarter 2012) (PDF, 1.7Mb)

   

• Communicate and share your experience throughout FEMA and the nation.
• Connect with other CDP alumni.
• Tell others about CDP training.

View the CDP Informational Video

What's New

October 29, 2012

Search for open shelters by texting: SHELTER and a Zip Code to 43362 (4FEMA). Ex: Shelter 01234 (std rates apply) | Red Cross shelters

October 29, 2012

Second quarter 2013 calendar available here »

October 9, 2012

First quarter 2012 Alumnus Newsletter available here »

September 4, 2012

Preparation for FEMA Student Identification (SID) Number Beta Release Learn more »

Featured Courses

Sneak peek
View all programs coming up

Anniston Weather

Current weather & 36-hour forecast

Go to Weather.gov »

Last Reviewed: January 22, 2013

• Site Map
• Consortium
• FAQ
• Job Opportunities
• Terms of Use
• Contact Us
• Emergency Management Institute

Center for Domestic Preparedness, 61 Responder Dr., Anniston, AL 36205
1-866-213-9553 E-mail Student Services

US Dept of Homeland Security Training Consortium

The National Domestic Preparedness Consortium (NDPC) is the principal vehicle through which DHS identifies, develop, tests, and delivers training to state and local emergency responders.
The NDPC membership includes DHS's Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP) in Anniston, Alabama, the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (NMIMT), Louisiana State University (LSU), Texas A&M University (TEEX), the Department of Energy's Nevada Test Site (NTS),  Security and Emergency Response Training Center (SERTC), (Transportation Technological Center Inc) Pueblo, Co.; and the National Disaster Preparedness Training Center (NDPTC) – Univ of Hawaii; each member brings a unique set of assets to the domestic preparedness program. The following is brief description of each member and their expertise:
Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP): The CDP provides hands-on specialized training to state and local emergency responders in the management and remediation of WMD incidents. Located at the former home of the U.S. Army Chemical School, Fort McClellan, the CDP conducts live chemical agent training for the nation's civilian emergency response community. The training emergency responders receive at the CDP provides a valid method for ensuring high levels of confidence in equipment, procedures and individual capabilities.
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (Energetic Materials and Research Testing Center) (EMRTC): EMRTC offers live explosive training including the use of field exercises and classroom instruction. EMRTC is the lead NDPC partner for explosives and firearms, live explosives, and incendiary devices training.
Louisiana State University (LSU) National Center for Biomedical Research and Training (NCBRT): The NCBRT provides high-quality training to emergency responders throughout the United States.  The NCBRT has more than 25 courses that have received DHS certification.  NCBRT has introduced 10 online courses that offer the same high-quality, challenging courses as those taught in the classroom, with the added convenience and flexibility of studying at locations and times that are convenient for the student.  The online courses can be accessed at http://www.ncbrt.lsu.edu/elearn/.   
Texas Engineering Extension Service (TEEX), National Emergency Response and Rescue Training Center (NERRTC):  NERRTC delivers a set of courses to prepare state and local officials for the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction. Courses are developed and designed to provide each specific segment of the emergency response community with the tools needed to accomplish its role in the event of a WMD incident.  Additionally, TEEX has developed an Interactive Internet WMD Awareness Course for emergency responders.  TEEX also provides technical assistance to state and local jurisdictions in the development of WMD assessment plans.
U.S. Department of Energy's Nevada Test Site - Counter Terrorism Operations Support (CTOS): The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) CTOS-Center for Radiological/Nuclear Training program located at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) is the nation’s premier weapons of mass destruction (WMD) radiological/nuclear training center. Since 1998, CTOS has focused on training America's First Responders to prevent, mitigate, or respond to terrorist’s use of radiological or nuclear weapons of mass destruction. Our mission is to develop and deliver the most realistic and highest quality training in support of Homeland Security using our extensive radiological expertise with the unique assets of the NNSS.

Security and Emergency Response Training Center (SERTC), (Transportation Technological Center Inc) Pueblo, CO - SERTC is recognized world-wide as the premier hands-on HAZMAT emergency response training center providing elite training opportunities in emergency response for surface transportation.

National Disaster Preparedness Training Center (NDPTC) – University of Hawaii:  The NDPTC is a member of the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium (NDPC), which was expanded in 2007 to address all-hazards capabilities by the addition of the University of Hawai`i. The NDPTC is authorized to develop and deliver training and educational programs related to homeland security and disaster management, with a specific focus on natural hazards, coastal communities, and the special needs and opportunities of islands and territories.  Uniquely positioned geographically and culturally, the NDPTC works collaboratively to develop and deliver training and education in the areas of disaster preparedness, response, and recovery to governmental, private, tribal, and non-profit entities, and under-represented/under-served communities. It incorporates urban planning and environmental management, emphasizing community preparedness and addressing the needs of vulnerable at-risk populations.

The Rep Giffords Shooting HOAX

The Rep Giffords Shooting   HOAX On 02.05.11,by DallasGoldBug This is the event they used to further the gun grab, and silence free speech across America. Learn the truth about what happened, and the lies that were told to further the political agenda of a handful of individuals who are not loyal to this nation. They will not stop until you stand up and make yourself heard. Your awareness of who they are and what they are attempting to accomplish will be the necessary tools that are required to stop their evil New World Order plans. After thousands of hours of on-going research, I have shared my findings with other professionals that have been following the same leads. We have found our evidence coincides with each other and tells an entirely different story than the mainstream and AP feed to the American people the day the event took place. The purpose of the page is not to accuse but to inform the public of some of our findings and inconsistencies in the witness testimonies, friends of Jared Lee Loughner, victim stories, along with a potential relationship link to DHS, and several media groups located in Arizona. We would like to stress that the alleged evidence and findings we have posted here is not intended to accuse those individuals of criminal activity.  It is only to show alleged relationships with some of the victims, friends, and witnesses, law enforcement, and many others that may be involved in the event that took place. If you see your picture here, we encourage you to come forward. If you would like to dispute any findings or offer additional information in the case, we encourage you to contact us directly so we can hear your story. We are open investigators and we encourage any information that we may consider to adjust our investigation and theory if needed. We apologize for any pain to family members or people not directly involved in what appears to be result of a false flag. It is not our intent to hurt feelings, cause pain, or accuse individuals. We are only trying to uncover the truth and give the information to the Citizens. We would love nothing more than to debunk our own theory in this case. If you have additional information that pertains to any of the individuals posted below, or would like to give us additional leads, we would like to speak to you. You can remain completely anonymous. Contact me any time at dallasgoldbug@gmail.com Let me begin by stating this section is an ongoing update. It will change whenever new information is uncovered and verified. SO please check back frequently or submit your e-mail address in the box to the left and I will notify you when there are major updates to be reviewed. To bring everyone up to speed with this event I will begin by asking you to wipe your mind clean from everything you believe to be fact that pertains to the Jan 8th event that took place in the SafeWay parking lot at the corner of the Ina and Oracle intersection. The following presentation is designed to show without question the events of the 8th day of January 2011 called "Operation Safeway" was a full scale drill, and not the scene of a multiple homicide including the assassination of a judge and the attempted assassination of a us representative. In order to save time and avoid confusion from all the facts in the case you must break it down into a pass/fail question. Unless you can get past the following question there is no need to spend your time on the evidence that preceded that point. Unless you are proceeding with respect to gain information as to who is behind the scenes and responsible for the event. The Giffords event can be broken down to one simple question. Was the event that day in the parking lot consistent with a 'Real World" crime of a multiple homicide? Or was it a planed drill, similar to what is outlined by the Department of Homeland Security internal memo titled the "ExPlan" document (downloadable here)?
	When I found the Explan leaked on a buliten board I imediately questioned it authenticity. The document outlined in detail a school shooting exercise scheduled to takeplace in the following week.  I was faced with the decision to alert the public as to the planned event and take the chance that the document was a fake, or keep it quiet and wait to see if the event went as they hade outlined it would.   Knowing what I know now, I would have traveled to the location and documented the event secretly but I chose to alert the public.  I sent it out to over 4000 individuals that I am in contact with that are government watchdogs like myself.
Within hours of sending it the Department Of Homeland Security took it upon themselves to call off the event (they claimed it was due to legitimate threats, something I highly doubt)  and by doing this they inadvertantly validated the ExPlan document I had obtained.  Now the document was no longer questioned as a fake, but a valid form of evidence that explained much of that event and of the Giffords HOAX.. The evidence I focus on is primarily photographic or video medium.  It is evidence that was readily available to the public shortly after the event took place, but now over time is disapearing more rapidly as I expose their lie.. I am not including testimony of eyewitnesses due to 1. Its not necessary to prove the case, and 2. People lie and there is no way to be sue they are even part of the actual event since there is only a few cases where eye witnesses that we see being interview by the news media were even photographed at the seen. The only other evidence that I would consider relevant but again not necessary to prove the case are the police radio broadcasts that I saved from the archives found at Radioreference.com. They can be tested for a 60cycl hum and proven authentic if needed to be used in court proceedings.
PART 1 You must first read the ExPlan. (Download here) This is critical as you need to understand the roles of the individuals you will see in the photographs. If you do not take the time to familiarize yourself with this document, you will not be able to fully grasp the entire event as it is presented. Not only does it document in detail all aspects of staging this drill, it also sheds light on other aspects of the event that you probably have questions about. One question in particular, is why do several eyewitness give conflicting accounts of the same event? Briefly to answer that question, is because they roll play the scene several times during the day, so that all the participating agencies get the opportunity to have their people run through the scenario and apply what it is they have been trained to do if the scenario were a real world event. This we will go into after the presentation. Here are some key portions of text taken directly from the ExPlan Document that you need to understand when examining this event. REMEMBER this ExPlan is set for a school shooting but when we look at several ExPlan documents from the past they are assembled by just basically changing the type of event and pertinent pieces to that specific event. Keep this in mind and substitute mass shooting for school shooting and you will see the documents integrity is not changed. From page 2 This ExPlan gives officials, observers, media personnel, and players from participating organizations information they need to observe or participate in a school shooting/domestic terrorism response exercise that focuses on participants emergency response plans, policies, and procedures as they pertain to school shooting. The information in this document is current at the date of publication, March 21, 2011, and is subject to change as dictated by the Exercise Planning Team. From page 7 Target Capabilities & Universal Tasks The National Preparedness Guidelines (The Guidelines) adopt a Capabilities-Based Planning process supported by three planning tools: the National Planning Scenarios, Target Capabilities List (TCL), and the Universal Task List (UTL). The Guidelines have steered the focus of homeland security toward a capabilities-based planning approach which takes an all-hazards approach to planning and preparation that builds capabilities that can be applied to a wide variety of incidents. The Target Capabilities List describes the generalized all-hazards capabilities related to the four emergency management & homeland security mission areas: Prevent, Protect, Respond, and Recover. It defines and provides the basis for assessing preparedness. From page 12 Terrorism - the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. (28Code of Federal Regulations, Section 0.85) From page 14-15 Exercise Participants (An additional document I suggest is the Actors agreement downloadable here) The term participant encompasses many groups of people, not just those playing in the exercise. Groups of participants involved in the exercise are as follows: Players. Players are agency personnel who have an active role in responding to the simulated emergency and perform their regular roles and responsibilities during the exercise. Players initiate actions that will respond to and mitigate the simulated emergency. Controllers. Controllers set up and operate the exercise site, plan and manage exercise play, and act in the roles of response individuals and agencies that are not playing in the exercise. Controllers direct the pace of exercise play; they routinely include members of the Exercise Planning Team. They provide key data to players and may prompt or initiate certain player actions to ensure exercise continuity. Simulators. Simulators are control staff personnel who role play nonparticipating organizations or individuals. They most often operate out of the SimCell, but they may occasionally have face-to-face contact with players. Simulators function semi-independently under the supervision of SimCell controllers, enacting roles (e.g., media reporters or next of kin) in accordance with instructions provided in the Master Scenario Events List (MSEL). All simulators are ultimately accountable to the Exercise Director and Senior Controller. Evaluators. Evaluators evaluate and provide feedback on a designated functional area of the exercise. They are chosen on the basis of their expertise in the functional area(s) they have been assigned to review during the exercise and their familiarity with local emergency response procedures. Evaluators assess and document participant’s performance against established emergency plans and exercise evaluation criteria, in accordance with Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) standards. They typically are chosen from planning committee members or agencies or organizations that are participating in the exercise. Actors. Actors simulate specific roles during exercise play. They typically are volunteers who have been recruited to play the role of victims or other bystanders. Observers. Observers visit or view selected segments of the exercise. Observers do not play in the exercise, nor do they perform any control or evaluation functions. Observers view the exercise from a designated observation area and must remain within the observation area during the exercise. VIPs are also observers, but they frequently are grouped separately. A dedicated group of exercise controllers will be assigned to manage these groups. Media Personnel. Some media personnel may be present as observers, pending approval by Emergency Management Agency and the Exercise Planning Team. Media interaction also may be simulated by the SimCell to enhance realism and meet related exercise objectives. A dedicated group of exercise controllers will be assigned to manage these groups. Support Staff. The exercise support staff includes individuals who are assigned administrative and logistical support tasks during the exercise (e.g., registration, catering). From page 18 If a real emergency occurs that affects the entire exercise, the exercise may be suspended or terminated at the discretion of the Exercise Director and Senior Controller. Notification will be made from the SimCell. Refreshments and Restroom Facilities Refreshments and potable water will be provided for all exercise participants throughout the exercise. Restroom facilities will be available at each venue. Exercise Identification Identification badges will be issued to the exercise staff. All exercise personnel andobservers will be identified by agency uniforms and/or identification badges distributed by the exercise staff. Table 2.1 describes these identification items. From page 19 Exercise Start, Suspension, and Termination Instructions The exercise is scheduled to run for 2 hours or until the Exercise Director determines that exercise objectives have been met. From the SimCell, the Exercise Director will announce the start of the exercise and exercise suspension or termination through the controller communications network. ALL SPOKEN & WRITTEN EXERCISE COMMUNICATIONS WILL BEGIN & END WITH THE STATEMENT THIS IS AN EXERCISE Player Communications Players will use routine, in-place agency communication systems. Additional communication assets may be made available as the exercise progresses. The need to maintain capability for a real-world response may preclude the use of certain communication channels or systems that usually would be available for an actual emergency. In no instance will exercise communications interfere with realworld emergency communications. Each venue will coordinate its own internal communication networks and channels. The primary means of communication among the SimCell, controllers, and venues will be the Pottawattamie County 800MHz radio system. A list of key telephone and fax numbers and radio call signs will be available in a Communications Directory before the exercise starts. In addition, the communications plan is attached at Appendix D. From page 20 Public Affairs This exercise enables players to demonstrate increased readiness to deal with a school shooting. Any public safety exercise may be a newsworthy event. Special attention must be given to the needs of media representatives, allowing them to get as complete and accurate a story as possible; however, their activities must not compromise exercise realism, safety, or objectives. Only designated agencies will be responsible for disseminating public information before Operation Closed Campus. The Emergency Management Agency will coordinate this function. From page 22 During the Exercise · Respond to exercise events and information as if the emergency were real, unless otherwise directed by an exercise controller. · Controllers will give you only information they are specifically directed to disseminate. You are expected to obtain other necessary information through existing emergency information channels. · Do not engage in personal conversations with controllers, evaluators, observers, or media personnel. If you are asked an exercise-related question, give a short, concise answer. If you are busy and cannot immediately respond, indicate that, but report back with an answer as soon as possible. · If you do not understand the scope of the exercise, or if you are uncertain about an organization's or agency's participation in an exercise, ask a controller. · Parts of the scenario may seem implausible. Recognize that the exercise has objectives to satisfy and may require incorporation of unrealistic aspects. Every effort has been made by the exercise’s trusted agents to balance realism with safety and to create an effective learning and evaluation environment. · All exercise communications will begin and end with the statement This is an exercise. This precaution is taken so that anyone who overhears the conversation will not mistake exercise play for a real-world emergency. · When you communicate with the SimCell, identify the organization, agency, office, or individual with whom you wish to speak. · Speak when you take an action. This procedure will ensure that evaluators are aware of critical actions as they occur. · Maintain a log of your activities. Many times, this log may include documentation of, activities that were missed by a controller or evaluator. After the Exercise · Participate in the Hot Wash at your facility with controllers and evaluators. · Complete the Participant Feedback Form. This form allows you to comment candidly on emergency response activities and exercise effectiveness. Provide the completed form to a controller or evaluator. · Provide any notes or materials generated from the exercise to your controller or evaluator for review and inclusion in the AAR. From page 27 THIS IS IMPORTANT Qualified personnel who have legal authority to carry weapons (e.g., lawenforcement, security, military) and who have an assigned exercise role (e.g., responder, tactical team)with the potential for interaction with other exercise participants (e.g., actor victims) will NOT carry a loaded weapon within the confines of the exercise play area. They may continue to carry their weapon only after it has been properly cleared and rendered safe (i.e., no ammunition in chamber, cylinder, breach, or magazines) and only after being marked oridentified in a conspicuous manner (e.g., bright tape visible around the stock or holster). Photo 1 "ExPlan Controller" This image was released by the AP. It shows a scene out front of the SafeWay, at or around the area said to have been where Rep Giffords was standing. Items of interest: All the individuals are wearing the appropriate gloves as you would expect Emergency responders would. All but one individual who is holding cards in his hands.  Notice no blood on anyone or what would be consistent with a point blank 9mm hollow point rounds damage to a human. The EMT personnel carrying yellow 900MHz communicators clipped on various points of clothing some on their pockets others on their belts. A small cup of what appears to contain something red. Assembly the red liquid used on some of the actors to make the event more realistic. (this is discussed in the Actors Agreement in the section that warns them to wear old clothes because they may get cut by the EMT workers and or ruined by the fake blood used during the drill) In this photo we see emergency personnel with gloves tending to an individual that is playing the role of a victim. This due to no signs of injury that we would expect from a shooting of this type. The individual without the gloves, is reading from cards he has in his hands. We can see there are more than one card due to he is reading from one hand while in his other hand more cards are visible. According to the ExPlan Document this person is identified as a Controller/Evaluator. Controller/Evaluators. Controllers are exercise participants who plan and manage the exercise play, setup and operate exercise venues, and act in the roles of response individuals and agencies not actually playing in the exercise. Controllers provide key data to players and may prompt or initiate certain player actions to ensure exercise continuity. Controllers are the only participants who will provide information or direction to the players. The Yellow communication radios they players are wearing are specified in the ExPlan as the 900MHz cell communications that the controllers and other officials can communicate directions to their particular group. Communicating in this fashion enables the chatter pertaining to the event to be on a controlled loop and keeps unnecessary chatter from interfering with the REAL WORLD communication they are still responsible to react to if an event should arise during their drill that they need to go take care of. Since they are clipping them on various parts of their body shown they are not standard equipment they typically carry, and in one video we even see one of the individual drop the radio on the ground as he is making his way to the helicopter. The Controller in this photo would be providing the EMT workers with necessary information so they can perform whatever task they have been trained to do. For example, something a controller might say during an event may be similar to the following statement: "This is Mary a 40 year old female that suddenly collapsed. before she fell witnesses overheard her make a comment that her head was throbbing shortly after, within minutes she collapsed" From that statement the EMT would then kick into high gear and perform as they would if this were a real event. Taking note of the Actors Agreement document we see the comment warning the actors to wear old clothes and understand they may be cut by EMT workers as they perform they duties. They are also made aware they may be transported to the emergency room just as if they were actually injured. Individuals that are tasked as the criminal for the event will be handcuffed and transported to the station just as if they actually committed the crime they are acting out. Transportation from the hospital or police station is also provided to them after the event is complete. That photo in itself should be enough to prove the event that day was a drill. But I understand there are skeptic that need further persuasion so we will move on to the next image. PHOTO 2 This photo that has been titled "Heroic Acts in Tucson" shows the heroic efforts of Daniel Hernandez, who is said to be one of Rep Giffords aids.  For the full size version click here This photo depicts the emergency workers while transporting an individual we are told by Daniel is that of Rep Giffords. In Daniels testimony on many occasions he states. This is from the Azcentral interview by Jaimee Rose and Mary Jo Pitzl - Jan. 9, 2011 12:01 AM Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/01/09/20110109daniel-hernandez-gabrielle-giffords-arizona-shooting.html#ixzz1UIgaBLRH When the shots began that morning, he saw many people lying on the ground, including a young girl. Some were bleeding. Hernandez said he moved from person to person checking pulses. "First the neck, then the wrist," he said. One man was already dead. Then he saw Giffords. She had fallen and was lying contorted on the sidewalk. She was bleeding. Using his hand, Hernandez applied pressure to the entry wound on her forehead. He pulled her into his lap, holding her upright against him so she wouldn't choke on her own blood. Giffords was conscious, but quiet. Ron Barber, Giffords' district director, was next to her. Hernandez told a bystander how to apply pressure to one of Barber's wounds. Barber told Hernandez, "Make sure you stay with Gabby. Make sure you help Gabby." Hernandez used his hand to apply pressure until someone from inside Safeway brought him clean smocks from the meat department. He used them to apply pressure on the entrance wound, unaware there was an exit wound. He never let go of her. He stayed with Giffords until paramedics arrived. They strapped her to a board and loaded her into an ambulance. Hernandez climbed in with her. On the ride to the hospital, he held her hand. She squeezed his back. When they arrived at the hospital, Hernandez was soaked in blood. His family brought him clean clothes because the FBI took his for evidence. Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/01/09/20110109daniel-hernandez-gabrielle-giffords-arizona-shooting.html#ixzz1UIgOspKu This statement was made to many news agencies which show they are not misquoting his recount of the event. Unfortunately when we view the photo of Daniel and the person said to be Giffords who is like he states strapped to a board and put on a stretcher, we find one LARGE discrepancy that makes not only his story a lie but again is consistent with that of a drill. That being for a person who used his bare hands to apply pressure on a persons through shot head wound, and to do so after they pulled that person up on their lap so "they wouldn't choke on the blood" the fact that not even a drop of blood is visible on his hands, clothing, the EMT workers, their gloves, Daniels pants ANYWHERE except a few little traces on the injured persons face and the towel sitting on their head. NOTHING even close to what would be expected if this event were a real world shooting. This is not even addressing the many other technical issues like the EMT worker holding the IV at the wrong elevation, or the Oxygen tank strapped in between the victims legs, and the fact there is not even a effort to cover the person and their undergarments (this of course being a US Representative no doubt) These additional items can be discussed and debated but the underlying facts that this photo shows people taking part in a DRILL is the main focus of this presentation. All other additional information is moot at this point. These two photographs should be sufficient in proving the official version of events not accurate and what actually occurred was a Drill. BUT... I know there will be some who still cant believe they were lied to by our officials, so we will continue with the next piece of photographic evidence. PHOTO 3 Lets call this one "couple grieving" since I have been unable to find any official name for the photograph. This image shows an older male and female couple. The male with his arm around the female in a condoling manner. We see the two carrying water bottles consistent with water bottles we see other actors carrying during this event. Refreshments as stated in the ExPlan document are provided and we can assume these water bottles are part of the refreshments. That fact is merely a side note as we see these individuals are clearly within the police DO NOT CROSS tape, meaning they are within the crime scene perimeter This means they are officials, or part of the emergency, as witnesses, or persons being questioned immediately after the event, even though this would more than likely take place outside the crime scene tape. This is key because we are told the Assassination of a Federal Judge and the attempted Assassination of a US Rep along with multiple others we said to have been killed within that crime scene. The preservation of a crime scene is key and with individual of such importance being part of the event there would be no detail overlooked or scrutinized. For witnesses to be walking within the crime scene perimeter unescorted would be unheard of, and grounds for any first year defense attorney to scream mistrial. In addition to these people walking carelessly within the crime scene we see in the background a person holding two forms of communications (again consistent with the the communications guidelines outlined in the ExPlan) she is also wearing a lanyard around her neck with a badge constant with that of an ExPlan colored identification badge. I go into this in detail in a later section. As if this weren't enough, its nothing in comparison to this next outrageous acts. Examining closely the individual within this photograph we can see they are identified as none other than two of Sheriff Dupnik's Aux Volunteers. There is no disputing their identity in the Annual Awards booklet produced and downloadable from the Sheriff's own web site. This shows without any doubt they are officials playing the roles of actors in this event. Without connecting them to the Awards booklet they would have remained just another by-standard. Again, I understand this is all so hard for some to deal with. It is something I wish were not true but unfortunately it is and is backed up by irrefutable evidence. But just in case there remains a few skeptics, we will continue. PHOTO 4 Where in the world is your wife Mary, Tom?This photo along with several others show an individual who we can identify as being Tom McMahon. Tom, husband of Mary Reed, who you might remember as being shot three times in the back and arms, as she spread eagle to protect her daughter Emma McMahon from being shot. She was also one of Representative Giffords' summer pages. The same Emma who ran inside the SafeWay after the shooting, and called 911 but neglected to tell the 911 operator that her own mother laid on the ground shot 3 times. In addition she also forgets to find her father who in his own statement claims to have been only 10-15 feet away. The same Emma who then tells the operator she will be hiding in the back of the store where its safe, but then during her interview with CNN she recalls calling from inside the WALGREENS but then proceeds to say the butchers from the meat department aided with the injured. WALGREENS does not have a meat department. If that story wasn't enough to seal the deal. Lets look at the next photograph. The tall person clearly visible in the photo is Tom McMahon. He along with many other civilians, stands inside the crime scene area as they enjoy their refreshing beverages provided by the event planners. Ask your self if your wife had just been shot three times and was rushed away to the emergency room don't you think you would be right along side of her? Of course you would, but here we see Tom without a care in the world. That's because the actor playing Mary was taken to the hospital as stated in the "Actors Agreement" and would be transported to the ER just as if it were a real world event. Leaving the other actors at the scene to continue playing their part until told the event was finished. By now there should be no question that the event that day was a controlled drill. When you understand this fact you can stop debating weather or not Loughner did this or did that, because it does not matter. The event stops when it is understood that it was a drill and no one was killed that day. Everything from that point is designed to keep you searching and distracted from the truth. In addition to the photographic evidence, the other credible piece of evidence that can also be verify are the Police broadcast. Listening to the broadcasts, we can hear several emergency calls go out over a period of several hours. This again was for a mass shooting that was under control, as per the sheriffs own press release, just minutes after the first responders arrived. But even though we have full statements from the Pima county Sheriff the same call for a mass shooting go out again almost two hours after the first two (the first we don't have a recording of since that Pima radio channel was under their total control. But we do have the Oro Valley broadcasts that confirm this. Listen for yourself. If you found this presentation helpful, please consider donating to help us to continue our efforts. At this point, you know it was a drill. Any information after this point is moot, and useless.  Unless you are attempting to trace down the parties responsible for the propaganda. Remember this and do not forget these things, as most people tend to fall back into the thinking that the information is factual, but IF THE EVENT WAS A DRILL THEN NONE OF THE OTHER STORIES ABOUT LOUGHNER IN HIS SCHOOL ACTING OUT ARE TRUE. No one was killed that day at that location. No one was shot in that parking lot. No child died that day due to being shot by a gunman in that parking lot. No Judge was Assassinated, and more than likely no judge was there due to that would have been not allowed for a Federal Judge to meet outside of business hours with elected officials of a political party. And MOST OF ALL Loughner does not exist. NONE of the individuals that claim to have been shot by him at telling the truth and we know that the Phyllis Schneck character was played by Brandan Lee Pittmans own Mother. The only person injured that day was Bill Badger. While being tackled by Joe Zamudio he hit his head. That is the only photos of real blood that spilled in that parking lot that day. So the following information is meaningless due to we have already established the event was a drill. It is the archive of the initial investigation which you are welcome to review if you so choose to spend your time discussing imaginary characters and how many bullets they would have fired in their imaginary Glock. Briefly after the events that took place in Tucson on Jan 8th, I began looking into what I believed was the media lying once again to the public about events, that would be used as fuel, to push, the anti gun, and free speech movement. My initial intent was to find out if indeed what I saw on TV was not just the creation of some Hollywood, made for TV production. But what I found shock me to the core of my being. It's difficult to understand fully the immensity of the information I present, but nevertheless, I feel it's my obligation to present it, so that you can make up you own conclusions. Good, bad, right, or wrong, understand I have no political, financial, personnel, or corporate agenda funding my actions. I stand to gain only more stress for releasing this info, but if the outcome rids this country of individuals that exist only to cause harm to others then it will have been worth it. You can learn more about my experience and background by visiting my bio section. The Investigation As I mentioned the information I have uncovered is not easy to swallow. I still have hope that I am wrong, but as the days go by the evidence increases as my hope that this is all one big misunderstand decrease to the point of almost nonexistence. It's my belief that if any progress is to be made, it will not be because I have managed to match a few more actors to their real identities. That doesn't mean that it was a waist of time by any means, it just means that I am choosing to focus my efforts on what I consider to be a key overlooked hurtle that once overcome, the rest of my work will have a proper place to be presented. My official statement as to the Rep Giffords event in Arizona, on Jan 8th 2011 is as follow: A foundation, based on irrefutable factual evidence must be established in order to eliminate the ability for the dis info agents to keep everyone distracted, and fighting internally with each other. This foundation is composed of a few basic questions that if the event we witnessed that day were accurately reported by the media, should prove simple to answer. These questions are as follows: Was they're a shooting at that location, on Jan 8th 2011, that involved the persons Representative Giffords, and The Honorable Judge John Roll? or Was the event in the SafeWay parking lot, and surrounding area, a staged training event similar to what is outlined in the ExPlan document, and subsequently no one was struck with a bullet at that location?
	To the best of my ability, I believe the only data that can be tested for accuracy and verified by proven scientific forensic analysis as to its authenticity, is the Police, and Fire, radio dispatch "calls" broadcast that day, by the Oro Valley police, and fire, dispatch center. That evidence, allows me to make the reasonable claim that the event that day was a drill. My statement is based on the fact that approximately 10:45am, Jan 8th, 2011, Oro Valley Police departments primary dispatch channel broadcast a call, concerning a "Mass Shooting" with multiple injured at the SafeWay parking lot, adjacent to the Ina and Oracle intersection in Tucson Arizona.
Included in her call was the information that directed those to the location that a command center was already set up in the parking lot, and from what direction to enter the shopping center. That same day, the same Oro Valley Police Dispatcher that made the 10:45 call, made a second call for another "Mass Shooting" at approximately 12:06pm to the same SafeWay Parking lot adjacent to the roads Ina and Oracle, and provides the identical information about the command center and how to enter the complex. Now remember the Shooting took place at 10:00am according to the Pima Sheriffs office press release first officers arrived at 10:15 and had the suspect in custody just a few minutes after arriving. The reason why we don't hear this call go out is due to the event calls for control of a radio channel for them to communicate on. This is confirmed by the Oro Valley dispatchers who make the comments that the other channel had so much traffic they couldn't get through to individuals they needed to speak to. The Oro Valley dispatch combined with the press releases released by Sheriff Dupniks office provides a full picture of the events that happened that day.
	Those are the irrefutable facts of the matter. Upon listing to the archived recording you can clearly hear the difference in the tones of the operators voice that during the first dispatch came from a person that obviously thought the event was real. The second time around her voice is drastically different, and almost completely monotone. We could speculate why but what is not speculation is the simple fact that the event was played out at least twice that day once at 10:36am and again at 12:06pm. Those are the facts as I know them and I would be willing to testify as to this statement under oath in court. If anyone has one of these badges that they can photocopy, or better yet, wold like to sell, I would be happy to discuss it with you or you can remain completely annon. I'm just trying to get the truth to the people.
For researchers Use this as a guide to understand how FSE's (Full Scale Events) are conducted. It outlines a school shooting scenario but the blueprint almost identical to the Giffords event as well as others. ExPlan,  Participant-Handout,  Actor-Info-Waiver-Form Police Dispatch at 5:00pm for 2nd shooter who matches physical description of Jared Loughner 10:35am calling out event and command center location 10:45am calling out the witnesses found gun outside 2nd safeway 12:03pm calling out event and command center location Shooting_Timeline Timeline_shooting_press_release Shooting_-_First_On_Scene Shooting_Injured,  Shooting_Update Shooting_Update_-_Photos_and_Video Attempt_to_Identify Events_New Memorial_Update Memorial_Update_011211 Operation_Center-corrected-1 Redacted_Shooting_Tapes Shooting_010811 Shooting_100210_safeway Shooting_-_Media_Inquiries
So who were the actors that were involved? Let me start with this clip. It aired on the 6th ~~~ 2 days BEFORE the Giffords event. When you watch this please take note of this clearly expresses someone had fore knowledge that the Giffords event was about to take place. Grey's Anatomy Season 7, Episode 11 - Air Date: 1/6/2011 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1782085/ Disarm" News of the incoming mass causalities after a gunman opens fire at a local college hits the staff hard when they must spring into action, even while their own wounds a... User Rating:  TVF Review:
After the event took place, I felt like most of America, that we were not being told the truth. So I managed to contact Steven Cates (the guy with the pink hair) through Face book. We chatted a few times but he never would admit to being an actor in this event, so I kept digging. After a few days of searching google for his name I ran across a web site that listed Steven as well as 3 other individuals as part of a media group called Radian-Helix media. Once I found their Face book site then each of the individuals listed as being a contributor to the company, the pieces started to fall in place. One by one the people we were being shown on the TV as being an eye witness, Dr., Giffords staffer, event attendee, first responder, etc were looking like friends of one of the Radian Helix Media partners, Dave Weiss As you look at the evidence keep Mr. Weiss in mind, and take a look at his FB page for your self. Is this all just a massive coincidence? Dave Weiss Facebook link Radian-Helix Media link Radian-Helix Media Corporate filings The individuals pictured below can be found in the following 3 Pima county documents. Download them and judge for yourself.       Click to download                Click to download                Click to download        The Real Dr. LeMole Found. DAVE WEISS has posted old photos of himself on his site in an attempt to through you off the path. Nice try there Dave. The mystery that surrounds him does not effect the fact that he is connected to all the individuals we talk about on this site. Dave Weiss aka Dr.. LeMole (Rep Giffords Arizona Dr.) isn't a Doctor at all, he just plays one on your TV. Dave is a partner in a film, video, and CGI media production company located in Arizona called Radian Helix media. Its owned by Brandan Pittman (the person you see when you look at the Jared Lee Loughner mug shot) In Daves Face Book friends list we find people that look alike and share the same genetic facial landmarks as do individuals either living or dead on the news. Here are just a few of the people you can find there: Dan Adragna or Holly Bobo's Father Amanda Barns Hicks or Holly bobo (missing Tennessee Girl) David Hicks or Gabe Zimmerman (Giffords Aid that was killed) Joshua Frederici or Bradley Manning (wikileaks leaker) Emily Kuntz  or Emma McMahon (Giffords Shooting eye witness) Bonnie-Jean Brown  or Mary Reed (Emma's McMahon Mother) Ronald Globe or Dr Steven Rayle (Giffords Shooting Eye witness) Anthony Nguyen or Dr. Peter Rhee (Giffords Arizona Dr) Michael Burkeen or Dr. Imoigele Aisku (Giffords Houston Dr) Daisy Axford or Kelly O'Brien (Gabe Zimmermans Fiance) Kristi Lanier or Desta Hughes Stutts (Current Speech Therapist for Giffords) Hope Nixon or Kenia Monge (Missing Colorado Teen) April DeWilde Warmington or Holly Bobo friend Samantha Archer or sister of Carrie Thomas Murdered at Moreno Valley ATM Anchyi Lena Urena or missing girl Yee Wah Ho Jason Bast or Fort Hood Shooter David Isaacs or Giffords Memorial guitar player (to come) Gabe Hernandez or John Inzuna Pam Simon or Nancy Koop Medley Dave Weiss or Dr Lemole Debbie Francis-Lane or Sara Hummel Rajca (Giffords Staff) David Waterso or fox news Jonathan Hunt Fritz Simon or James Eidlhuber Ben Lofton Loughner family friend Please note individuals may look slightly different than their personal photos. Keep in mind we are talking about Hollywood. These people are actors and have makeup hair and lighting to help out covering or changing their appearance. Also Some people have gained or lost weight since one or the other photo was taken. I don't know when their FB photos were shot but this down not change facial landmarks as they are genetically positions and are not changeable like soft tissue is. Another note - Just because you can pull a web page up wit a Dr. and their bio on it does not mean that person actually exists. I will report my findings shortly that address the misconception about fake pages, and how to take your investigation one step further past their laziness to uncover if the person really is who they say or exists at all. Liars EXPOSED As I get time I will be including the Archived Face Book pages of each of the individuals so you can see the connection in their friends list to Dave Weiss or someone that knows Weiss.
\