Dr. Taitz, Esq. has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
I talked to Mr. Dennison, writer of the SCOTUS blog. I called his cell number 301-512-4731.
He was correct in stating that SCOTUS only denied the STAY as Obama
was already sworn in, SCOTUS never commented on the merits of the case,
never stated that Obama’s papers are valid.
I asked, why did they sent 5 packets back. He said that they only
need the decision of 4 justices to go to the next stage of oral
argument. I responded that this looks even more corrupt and treasonous,
it means that they sent the remaining packets to 4 liberal justices and 5
conservative justices never saw the papers. He stated that if I feel
that the high treason was committed, I should file a complaint with the
Justice department. I responded that the Justice department is
complicit. I forwarded all the info to Holder and he never responded. I
told him that in NAZI Germany they also had a Justice Department,
Supreme Court, Parliament and judges, none of whom found one single
action by Adolf Hitler to be unconstitutional and that is what we have
now in the U.S. He said that he knows, that he is old enough to know
what happened in Germany, but he can’t talk further.
Dr. Orly Taitz,
Esquire 2 hours ago Extremely important! E-mail the Judiciary committee
at KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov and call at 202-225-3951
legalnews.findlaw.com/article/
0cQ43kV5s873C?q… –
Cached
Interesting fact: when I tried to fax the letter to President of
Israel Shimon Peres, there was a message in Hebrew from the phone
company that the fax is blocked. Why would the state department of
Israel post on their web site the fax number, which is blocked?
Here is the letter and 137 pages of exhibits which I am mailing as the fax machine is blocked
Letter to the President of Israel and 137 pages of exhibits
Dear Orly,
Please see the link from Israeli site:
My best wishes to you & family
Yours,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyle_Denniston
Orly, I called Congressman Robert Goodlatte, Chairman of House Judicial Committe, district office, at
540-857-2672.
The lady that answered was very kind and professional. I explained
about the clerks at Supreme Court not noticing judges. I asked for
investigation. I got the impression that I was the first caller. I gave
her your website to pass on to Congressman. Hope other people call. Keep
up you great efforts. Herbert Blazier Ps. my yahoo mail account may be
hacked. Every time I try to send mail I have to put in coded letters.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Cabinet
Noonan Suplemental brief draft
Affidavit of Jeffrey Stephan Coffman
Affidavit Al Hendershot corrected
Taitz v Astrue 12.08.2012 letter to SCOTUS
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court
never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings,
they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief.
Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of
the Judiciary Committee of Congress
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com
02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS
AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM
THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING
REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO CUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE
JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF HE CASE, EVIDENCE
OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON
IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013 Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for
stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to
the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference
of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed
Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by
a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application
is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original
application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual
justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5
justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss
the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the
pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of
the original box in which 5 copies were sent back, as well as the
photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as
evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted
to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to
the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the
February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James
Baldin. She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the
entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but
the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2
Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it
back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a
conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United
States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought
by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and
Keith Judd against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to
stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S.
President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate
committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and
when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination
due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as
he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S.
Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the
candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud,
on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security
number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of
Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt
governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and
abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii
Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a
candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions
of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate
ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme
Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records,
sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and experts
showing that Barack Obama is:
- A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203
from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As a citizen of
Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S.
Presidency.
- Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this
court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, deceased
mother of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name
Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of
1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and
signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for
removal as listed in the passport, is obtaining a foreign allegiance,
it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s
passport when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
- Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff
provided affidavits from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph
Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul
Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a
computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a
document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation
of the original document. Registrar of the State of Hawaii and
Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of
the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to
comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth
certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the
alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it
is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine
1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on
the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of
Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY.
In this supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional
evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special
Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and former special
agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty
of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a
forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of
Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit
of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast
Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged
application for the selective service is a forgery. According to 5 USC
§ 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective
Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register
with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to
register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (
50 App. U.S.C.
453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so
register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the
individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate
we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the
Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such
Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S.
government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a
janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise
its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.
- 4. Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama
himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number
xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of
investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it
being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia,
immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was
either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a
treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s
use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United
States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the
private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his
use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18
month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme
Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to
either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of
California for reconsideration.
315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING
TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY:
IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS
AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN
THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a
process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor
distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to
spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they
won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on
summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And
law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for
the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the
Supreme Court in regards to case
Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304,
where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively
obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the
Supreme Court. Taitz provided the court with Federal Express
receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for
by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden
from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees
of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by
the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows
where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case
Lightfoot v Bowen
A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz was deleted from the docket of the
Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give
an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy.
Only after the enormous pressure from the public, media, State
Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was
reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle
repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were
deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the
case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book
signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice
Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even
though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of
justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S.
President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge
would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing
with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a
month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case
Lightfoot v Bowen
was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on
the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case
at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH
TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or
death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people
are.
In a different case
Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice
Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz
demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to
deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to
Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the
Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that
there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition.
As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever
read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme
Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases,
they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a
case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S.
Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his
name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social
Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this
usurpation to go on is an act of
HIGH TREASON. The
nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of
the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn
affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand
signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the
application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the
plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never
saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees
with unknown allegiance. Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of
the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices
and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs,
U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to
know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason,
who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which
is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate
investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court
of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices
and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security
042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Press Release
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Commissioner of Social Security administration previously defaulted
in RICO (Racketeering case) related to him covering up Obama’s use of a
stlen CT Social security number, which was never assigned to him
according o E-Verify and SSNVS.
Now he defaulted in yet another circuit: US Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit. Notice of Default and motion for the
default judgment was filed in DC.
Obama is currently in default in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Judges of these courts have to finally issue a default judgment and
order production of all the original documents as part of the post
judgment discovery. It is time to put an end to this national nightmare
and national disgrace. It is time to end the most egregious case of the
elections fraud, forgery and treason.
| Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 |
Docketed: 10/31/2011 Termed: 05/25/2012 |
| Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
| Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue |
| Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Fee Status: Fee Paid |
| Case Type Information: |
| 1) Civil US |
| 2) United States |
| 3) |
|
| Originating Court Information: |
| District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL |
Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL |
| Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge Date Filed: 02/16/2011 Date Order/Judgment: Date NOA Filed: 08/30/2011 10/25/2011 |
| 03/16/2012 |
 |
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply
to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012)
combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN
FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service
Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 04/27/2012 |
 |
MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for
default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012)
[Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 05/25/2012 |
|
PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304] |
| 06/04/2012 |
|
PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly
Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail]
Pages: 16-20. [11-5304] |
| 06/20/2012 |
|
SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304] |
| 07/30/2012 |
|
MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to
recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012)
[Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 08/02/2012 |
|
CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon
consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is
ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot. No mandate has issued in
this case. A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the
court. The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v.
Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court. [1387271-2] [11-5304] |
| 08/09/2012 |
|
PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304] |
| 08/29/2012 |
|
MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304] |
| 01/29/2013 |
|
MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS"] [1417882] by
Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on
02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with
attachments. [11-5304] |
|
IN THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
TAITZ
V
ASTRUE
COURT OF APPEALS NUMBER 11-5304
US DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 11-CV-00402-RCL
NOTICE OF DEFAULT/ FAILURE TO RESPOND BY THE APPELLEE
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Phone 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, Appellant herein filed a motion for
reconsideration/ motion to recall the mandate due to new evidence and
new precedents by this court. This court ordered the Appellee,
Commissioner of Social Security Administration to respond by February
11, 2013. As of today, February 18.2013 Appellee did not comply with the
court order and failed to respond to the motion. As such Appellant
notifies this court the Appellee is in contempt of the court order and
in default and therefore the Appellant is respectfully moving this court
to grant the Appellants motion for reconsideration /to recall the
mandate.
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Orly Taitz, ESQ
Certificate of service
I, Lila Dubert, am over 18 years old, not a party to this case. I
attest that I served the Appellee with the attached Notice of Default /
Motion for Default Judgment through his Attorney , Helen Gilbert,
Deputy U.S. Attorney by first class mail and/or ECF
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC
(202) 252-1900
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lila Dubert
02.18.2013
Commissioner of Social Security
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
On February 14, 2013, Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting
Commissioner of Social Security. Prior to this designation, she served
as the Deputy Commissioner, having been confirmed by the United States
Senate on December 22, 2010 as President Obama’s nominee. In addition to
her role as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Ms. Colvin
serves as a Trustee to the Social Security Board of Trustees.
As acting head of the Social Security Administration, Colvin
administers the Social Security programs (retirement, survivors and
disability), as well as the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program.
Social Security provides financial protection to more than 158
million workers and their families. It pays approximately $736 billion
annually in benefits to more than 55 million Americans who receive
monthly retirement, disability or survivors benefits. The SSI program
pays monthly benefits to more than 8 million Americans aged, blind or
disabled people who have few, if any, resources.
The Social Security Administration is an independent federal agency
headquartered in suburban Baltimore with a national workforce of about
62,000 employees and 1,500 facilities nationwide.
Throughout her career, Ms Colvin has managed programs that help
people with their healthcare and financial needs. She previously help
key executive positions at Social Security Headquarters: Deputy
Commissioner for Policy and External Affairs (1994-1996), Deputy
Commissioner for Programs and Policy (1996-1998), and Deputy
Commissioner for Operations (1998-2001).
Ms. Colvin earned her graduate and undergraduate degrees in business
administration from Morgan State University. Additionally, she completed
the Senior Executives in State and Local Government Program at Harvard
University, the Maryland Leadership Program, and the Greater Baltimore
Leadership Program. Ms Colvin is from Maryland and currently resides in
Anne Arundel County. She has one son and six grandchildren.
You can write to the Commissioner at the address below:
Carolyn W. Colvin Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration 6401 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21235-0001
Michelle Obama’s law license was placed in involuntary inactive
status in 1993, only 4 years after she started working as an attorney
and when she reportedly had large debts for Princeton and Harvard. This
was rather strange, why someone who put so much effort in her education
would forfeight her law license, particularly since she said that she
and Barack were dead poor and had huge debts.
I got a tip from someone who claimed that she was a court reporter in
Florida, that there was a litigation against Obamas after which
Michelle’s license was placed in an inactive status and that this law
suit was somehow connected to Obama’s use of Bounel’s Social. I do not
know if this tip is correct. Just to be on the safe side, please check
in the Federal and state courts in FL between 1992-1997 any legal
actions under the name Michelle Obama or Michelle Robinson or Michelle
Lavonne Robinson. Please, start with the area where Obama is playing
golf this weekend.
As I said, this was not verified yet, but it needs to be checked.
here is the tip, it needs to be checked and verified:
Orly..apologies for not giving more complete info, but did not wish
to be repetitious as to my identity, for we have had some communication,
though I know you get much mail re your case…
I am the former court reporter from Miami, Florida, who reported most of
the depositions in a case brought by Ann Dunham re paternity of her son
and which culminated in the mid-1990s, and I contacted you early on in
that regard… concurrent with Ms. Dunham’s litigation, which was out of
Chicago but the depositions were being held in Miami, was also
litigation involving possible mortgage money fraud in bank loans by, I
believe it was Citigroup. I first became aware of the name Harrison J.
Bounel as being the name of the individual to whom an interest in the
property now occupied by Obamas in Chicago was granted to Michelle
Robinson and Harrison J. Bounel, said interest in property being
transferred to them by a fellow by the name of Rezko….
though I was not the reporter in the Citigroup case, that case did go
through the court reporting office by whom I was employed, and several
of the reporters would ask me to review their transcripts re real estate
transactions, and that is when I discovered the name of Harrison J.
Bounel within all of the documents that were produced in the Citigroup
case. Later in the mid 1990s, I also was the reporter for the final
order of the disbarment proceedings against Michelle Robinson (Obama)
and her husband Barack Hussein Obama, a case originating out of Cook
County, Illinois, but final order being recorded in Miami, Florida, and
Michelle Robinson Obama being present. If i recall correctly, we were
located within a conference room of the law offices of Moskowitz… sorry,
but can’t recall full names at the moment, I have been very very ill… I
also recorded the final judicial order of the Court on Ms. Dunham’s
original paternity suit that she filed in Chicago, Illinois, and did
report some of the hearings in the Citigroup case that were held in
Miami, Florida, that case being eventually held in abeyance, but is now
required to be ‘of record’…
patricia anderson
I found very few cases under Ann Dunham in Federal courts. A
couple of cases have dockets but the actual pleadings are not available.
Probably these cases are not connected to Ann Dunham, mother of Obama,
but just to check all leads, I am asking my supporters to stop at the
court house and get the actual pleadings in the VA case and TX case.
Also, I need someone to stop at the circuit court in Honolulu and get
all the papers in the divorce proceedings for Ann Dunham in her divorce
fromn her first and second husband and of MY Soetoro in her divorce from
her first husband.
Also, if you reside in Miami, please stop at the circuit court in
Miami as well as county recorder’s office, please, look in archives for
any recordings of judgments involving Ann Dunham, Ann Soetoro, Ann
Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Soebarkah, Harry (Harrison
)Bounel, Michelle Rbinson, Michelle Obama
Obama Returns with Reggie Love...
Here is an interesting radio program
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1B33IvnJ4M&feature=share&list=PL6F41C441C9D9BEED
which echoes what I’ve been saying all along: do not get intimidated
by the disinformation, do not run away to Panama and Costa Rica, fight
for your land, fight for your home, fight for your rights, send the
criminals on the run if they want to avoid prison term. You have to
expose corruption, criminality and grand theft in the government, file
criminal complaints, be in the face of the congressmen, senators, chiefs
of police, sheriffs, demand prosecution of criminals in high positions
of power, exercise your 2nd amendment to bear arms, keep in mind there
are 315 million of us and 545 of them (Congress, President and the
Supreme Court). If you add more corrupt officials and corrupt judges,
there are maybe 1000 of them. Not only we can win this battle, defend
our Constitutional and civil rights and defend our rights to bear arms,
we can win with bare arms.
One of the techniques in overcoming hostage takers, is by hostages
charging the hostage takers simultaneously. Even being unarmed they can
prevail.
One of the most famous Soviet dissidents, Nathan Sharansky wrote that
ultimately Democracy wins, as the regime is like a guard, which is
forced to stand guard without rest, day and night. At some point the
guard gets tired and puts down his weapon, falls asleep, becomes
complacent. People, who are seeking freedom from tyranny will never
become complacent until they are free.
Keep in mind:
a. sun is the best disinfectant
b. the best defense is offense
Obama regime has trumpeted today ”Israel gives an award to Obama, Israel pro-Obama”
Well, not really, not so fast. What was not explained by the Obama regime, is the following:
the state of Israel, as many western states has two positions:
a. Prime minister. In case of Israel it is Netanyahu who actually leads the government and makes the policy
b. a ceremonial position of the President. The president is not a
part of the government, he has no impact on policies. In a number of
nations a constitutional monarch plays such a role of a ceremonial head
of state. In Israel the ceremonial head of state is a 90 year old Shimon
Peres. Peres is hardly seen or heard from in Israel. He is a former
leader of the left wing Labor party. In the latest elections Labor party
did poorly, it wasn’t even second in the number of mandates. Last year
Peres visited the states and Obama shmoosed the decrepit old socialist
with a Presidential Medal of Freedom, even though nobody understood why.
But then again Obama was nominated to a Nobel peace prise after only
12 days in office watching football and holding parties, so why not give
a Presidential medal of Freedom to an old socialist and get come
mileage out of it.
So, as Obama announced his upcoming visit to Israel, Peres announced
that he is reciprocating the favor and giving a medal to Obama. So this
exchange of feathers in the hat between two socialists: Obama and
Peres, really does not reflect anything in regards to real allocation
of forces on the ground. This in itself was not worthy of much attention
and probably has as much meaning as Prince Charles giving some award to
a starlet. What was interesting, is they way Netanyahu used this
opportunity.
Netanyahu made a public comment welcoming Obama on his upcoming trip
to Israel and stated that indeed there is a need for negotiations with
Palestinians without preconditions. By saying that he set Obama up. You
might ask why so?
To better explain this I should explain the domestic political
environment in Israel. Netanyahu just won the reelection, however Israel
is a multiparty state, where 120 seat parliament, Knesset, is comprised
of multiple parties. Latest election gave an unexpected large number of
mandates to a relative newcomer Yair Lapid. Lapid became the leader of
the second largest party in Israel. He is a former talk show host and a
son of a former member of the parliament Tommy Lapid. Netanyahu might
need to build a coalition with Lapid. (a side note. when I was in
Israel, I gave interviews ro a number of TV channels and while in one of
the studios I was introduced to someone who stood in the doorway
watching me giving an interview. I was told that this is another talk
show host, I could swear it was Lapid, but I might be mistaken). At any
rate Lapid is a moderate, however he has no experience in either foreign
politics or defense. He ran mostly on domestic issues. One of those
issues is a requirement for ultra-orthodox to serve in the military.
Netanyahu is an economist, he would like to work with Lapid to
strengthen the economy, but he does not want to give concessions to the
Palestinians which would endanger the national security. I believe
Netanyahu would also like to give one of the key positions related to
security to Yair Shamir, the son of Prime minister Yitzhak Shamir.
Shamir is a former air-force officer and had a distinguished career in
the Defense industry, both as a governmental official and a sucessful
private businessman.
Until now Obama demanded a halt on construction in the Judea and
Samaria (West Bank ) as a prerequisite to peace negotiations with
Palestinians. To Israelis these demands by Obama make as much sense as a
hypothetical demand by Mexico stop all construction in California and
Texas as a prerequisite to peace with Mexico because Ca and TX used to
be a part of Mexico. This is probably the reason why according to latest
surveys Obama’s popularity in Israel is 6%.
Now there are two possibilities: If Obama responds to the latest
statement by Netamyahu by being silent and not demanding that Netanyahu
stop construction in the Judea and Samaria region, then Netanyahu
won, he got Obama of his back and can build a coalition and deal with
domestic programs.
If Obama responds by contradicting Netanyahu and demanding that
Israel stop construction in the Judea and Samaria, then Netanyahu can go
to the people of Israel and state: we opened our arms, we gave this
president an award, but his demands are unreasonable, these are demands
that Obama would never place in front of his own people and we have to
do whatever we need to assure our national security. As such Netanyahu
would be well positioned to move on with the coalition of his choice.
Another interesting tidbit of information: as Obama and Clinton are
traveling to Israel in the end of March, Rubio announced his planned
trip to Israel as well. Both parties need Jewish donors for 2014 midterm
election.
We’ll see what the next move will be…
SCOTUS 02.19.2013
SCOTUS 02.19.2013 order does not state yet whether the case was granted or denied, no decision yet
Category: Events,
HOT ITEMS!,
Important Contacts,
Latest News,
Legal Actions,
Obama Fraud Gate,
Orly Taitz civil rights leader,
Orly Taitz Obama birth certificate,
Orly Taitz Obama social Security number,
Orly Taitz ObamaFraudGate,
Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities,
Supporting Documentation
Press release
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Attorney Orly Taitz continues with the demand for the Judiciary
Committee to investigate the fact that 5 out 9 Justices of the Supreme
Court never saw the casesupposedly heard in conference by the Supreme
Court and all 9 never saw the supplemental brief filed with SCOTUS, as 5
original sets of briefs were sent back and all supplemental briefs
were sent back and never docketed.
An order by the Supreme Court shows a notation after case 12A712
applications denied, which appear to relate to case 12A606, however
evidence shows that the case was not heard at all as 5 out of 9 Justices
never even got a packet with pleadings.
There are 7 other cases that are proceeding in other courts.
While a part of those cases might be considered moot, such as stays
of certifications, the bulk of the cases is not moot, such as
Declaratory Relief and RICO (racketeering) cases.
Overwhelming and never refuted evidence shows Barack Obama using a
Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned
to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Sworn affidavit of Chief
investigator of special Investigations unit of the U.S. Coast Guard
shows Obama using a forged Selective Service Certificate and multiple
experts showed the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate to be a
forgery. In a case in MS, which included the RICO charges, Obama’s
personal attorneys submitted a new copy of the birth certificate, which
according to experts represents a forgery of a forgery, which was made
to minimize the white halo effect around the letters. This white halo
effect created by computer manipulation made the initial forgery
released on April 27, 2011 a complete joke.
For four and a half years now in spite of multiple legal actions, not
one single judge or jury ever saw an original 1961 birth certificate
for Obama, original selective service certificate or original SS-5
application for the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which Obama
claims to be assigned to him.
Due to lack of any original documents and a mountain of evidence
showing the alleged copies to be crude forgeries, it is safe to
assume ”original documents” never existed.
Please, keep in mind: if a criminal and his accomplices in high
places could steal the U.S. Presidency, the White House, they can steal
your house, they can steal anything.
Current policies and proposals by Obama devalued the U.S. dollar by
incurring 6.5 trillion debt in 4 years, this devalues the savings of
every American. Recent proposed for a sweeping amnesty for at least 11
million illegals (real number range from 30-42 million illegals residing
in the U.S.) will further destroy the U.S. job market and further
bankrupt the U.S. economy. Recent proposals limiting the second
amendment rights will take away the citizens rights to fight the
dictatorial regime.
We have a citizen of Indonesia Barry Soebarkah, aka Barry Soetoro,
claiming to be Barack Obama, who is usurping the U.S. Presidency with
forged and stolen IDs. Obama defaulted in the Eastern District of
California. Commissioner of Social Security defaulted in two cases: in
MS and DC. both obama and Commissioner of Social Security have nothing
to negate the evidence against them.
Please, remember Nixon was forced to resign 6 month after he was
reelected. It is up to you, up to each and every American to fight this
criminal enterprise ruling the country and regain some decensy and some
constitutional and civil rights. If you do not fight for your rights,
the ruling criminal enterprise will take away more and more of your
rights.
Liberty does not come cheap, you have to fight for your rights. Every
American has to join the protests in front of the Federal buildings,
offices of congressmen and senators and demand immediate hearing in the
US Congress of Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs. Now there are over
33,000 signatures on the petition by attorney Taitz for the U.S.
Congress to investigate Obama’s fored IDs. To sign the petition, please,
go to the website OrlyTaitzESQ.com. In the right upper corner of the
first page of the web site there is a picture of statue of Liberty with
a red button “take action”. Please, click that button, it will lead you
to the petition.
Every American citizen is urged to call each and every member of the
U.S. House of Represntatives Committee for the Judiciary and demand
investigation of Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen SSN.
Every American is urged to protest in front of the outlets of the
controlled and censored puppet U.S. main stream media, which is
indistinguishable in its emptiness from the official media of the
Stalinist Soviet Union, Maoist China, Jihadist Iran or NAZI Germany in
1930s. If we do not protest this power grab by this foreign national
with forged IDs Soebarkah-Soetoro-Obama, United States of America will
resemble Germany in 1940s.
An official complaint of deprivation of the civil and constitutional
rights in the United States, including the right to participate in
lawful eletions is being filed with the Inter American Commission for
Human Rights.
Together we will prevail and together we will defeat the criminal enterpise running this nation.
Law offices of Orly Taitz
29829 Santa Margarita ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitzesq.com
orly.taitz@gmail.com
for emergencies only call 949-683-5411
| Court of Appeals Docket #: 13-60024 |
Docketed: 01/10/2013 |
| In re: Orly Taitz |
| Appeal From: Southern District of Mississippi, Jackson |
| Fee Status: fee paid |
| Case Type Information: |
| 1) Original Proceedings |
| 2) NP Mandamus |
| 3) |
| |
| Originating Court Information: |
| District: 0538-3 : 3:12-CV-280 |
| Originating Judge: Henry T. Wingate, Chief JudgeDate Rec’d COA:01/10/2013 |
| 01/10/2013 |
|
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [13-60024] (MRW) |
| 01/10/2013 |
 |
PETITION filed by Petitioner Dr. Orly Taitz
for writ of mandamus [7268373-2] Date received in 5th Circuit:
01/10/2013. Fee due on 02/11/2013 for Petitioner Orly Taitz. Date of
Service: 01/09/2013 [13-60024] (MRW) |
| 01/10/2013 |
|
FEE PAID by Petitioner Dr. Orly Taitz. Fee deadline satisfied [13-60024] (MRW) |
|
| Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 |
Docketed: 10/31/2011
Termed: 05/25/2012 |
| Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
| Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue |
| Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Fee Status: Fee Paid |
| Case Type Information: |
| 1) Civil US |
| 2) United States |
| 3) |
| |
| Originating Court Information: |
| District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL |
Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL |
| Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District JudgeDate Filed: 02/16/2011Date Order/Judgment:Date NOA Filed:08/30/201110/25/2011 |
| 03/16/2012 |
 |
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply
to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012)
combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN
FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service
Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 04/27/2012 |
 |
MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for
default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012)
[Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 05/25/2012 |
|
PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304] |
| 06/04/2012 |
|
PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly
Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail]
Pages: 16-20. [11-5304] |
| 06/20/2012 |
|
SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304] |
| 07/30/2012 |
|
MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to
recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012)
[Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 08/02/2012 |
|
CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon
consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is
ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot. No mandate has issued in
this case. A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the
court. The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v.
Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court. [1387271-2] [11-5304] |
| 08/09/2012 |
|
PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304] |
| 08/29/2012 |
|
MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304] |
| 01/29/2013 |
|
MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS"] [1417882] by
Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on
02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with
attachments. [11-5304] |
|
Press release
Law Offics of Orly Taitz
Every law abiding U.S. citizen is urged to e-mail and call the
Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives c/o staff
member
c/o Committee staff member KathrynRexrode.
Kathryn.Rexrode@mail.house.gov
202-225-3951
and demanded immediate hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use of
forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as well
as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of the
U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a
number of courts. Over 34,000 citizens signed this petition as can be
seen on OrlyTaitzESQ.com. 34,000 U.S. citizens are demanding an
immediate hearing on this most important issue of elections fraud,
forgery and treason
Attention Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives
Attention Chairman Congressman Bob Goodlatte
c/o Committee staff member KathrynRexrode.
KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov
202-225-3951
Noonan v Bowen application for STAY Supreme Court of the U.S. Roberts
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court
never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings,
they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief.
Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of
the Judiciary Committee of Congress
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com
02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone: (202) 225-5431 Fax: (202) 225-9681
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS
AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM
THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING
REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO CUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE
JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF HE CASE, EVIDENCE
OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON
IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013 Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for
stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to
the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference
of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed
Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by
a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application
is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original
application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual
justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5
justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss
the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the
pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of
the original box in which 5 copies were sent back, as well as the
photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as
evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted
to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to
the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the
February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James
Baldin. She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the
entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but
the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2
Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it
back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a
conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United
States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought
by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and
Keith Judd against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to
stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S.
President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate
committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and
when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination
due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as
he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S.
Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the
candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud,
on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security
number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of
Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt
governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and
abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii
Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a
candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions
of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate
ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme
Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records,
sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and experts
showing that Barack Obama is:
- A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203
from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As a citizen of
Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S.
Presidency.
- Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this
court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, deceased
mother of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name
Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of
1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and
signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for
removal as listed in the passport, is obtaining a foreign allegiance,
it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s
passport when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
- Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff
provided affidavits from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph
Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul
Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a
computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a
document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation
of the original document. Registrar of the State of Hawaii and
Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of
the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to
comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth
certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the
alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it
is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine
1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on
the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of
Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY.
In this supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional
evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special
Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and former special
agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty
of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a
forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of
Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit
of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast
Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged
application for the selective service is a forgery. According to 5 USC
§ 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective
Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register
with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to
register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (
50 App. U.S.C.
453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so
register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the
individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate
we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the
Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such
Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S.
government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a
janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise
its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.
- 4. Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama
himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number
xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of
investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it
being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia,
immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was
either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a
treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s
use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United
States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the
private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his
use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18
month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme
Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to
either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of
California for reconsideration.
315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING
TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY:
IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS
AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN
THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a
process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor
distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to
spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they
won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on
summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And
law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for
the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the
Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of
Columbia Circuit no 11-5304, where Taitz caught the employees of the
Supreme Court actively obstructing justice and tampering with the
documents submitted to the Supreme Court. Taitz provided the court
with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme
Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never
docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the
employees. These employees of the court were not appointed by the
President, were not confirmed by the Senate, they never took an Oath of
Allegiance and nobody knows where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen A-084524 by the
same attorney Taitz was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on
inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression
that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the
enormous pressure from the public, media, State Representatives and
sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public
docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect
statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of
computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009
during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz
was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely
clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket
he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case
dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny
that case. One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some
trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he
supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It
is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the
names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no
clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the
usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH TREASON, for which guilty
parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the
nation is entitled to know who these people are.
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice
Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz
demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to
deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to
Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that
there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition.
As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever
read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme
Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases,
they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of
usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia
who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs
and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his.
Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of
HIGH TREASON.
The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9
justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and
sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully
demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of
the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the
plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never
saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees
with unknown allegiance. Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of
the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices
and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs,
U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to
know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason,
who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which
is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate
investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court
of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices
and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security
042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Exhibit 3
Noonan v Bowen application for STAY Supreme Court of the U.S. Roberts
Editor of Molokai-News George Peobody forwarded
Congress Judiciary Committee Investigate Treason and Fraud and Obstruction of Justice
|
EditorMolokai Advertiser-News George Peabody
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please REPLY to confirm receipt of this message.
Dear Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives c/o Committee staff member KathrynRexrode.
Please initiate immediate a hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use
of forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as
well as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of
the U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a
number of courts.
Investigation to start with these:
1. Is Harry J. Bounel the President of the United States who filed his
2009 federal tax return using his lawfully issued Social Security
#042-68-4425? AND, why is Barack H. Obama II aka Barry Soetoro using
on his 2009 federal tax return a stolen Social Security #042-68-4425,
that belongs to one of his wife’s relatives named Harrison J. Bounel
whose date of birth was 1890?
2. Barack H. Obama II aka Barry Soetoro admitted in 1991 publication of
his bio that he was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii. Since then his
grandmother provided his Kenyan birth certificate and stated she was
present at his birth in Kenya; and Obama/Soetoro and Michelle Obama
have stated that Kenya is the land of his birth; and Prior to Obama’s
ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated
that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative
assembly who celebrated for the record about their Kenyan boy who rules
the United States of America. Furthermore, it has been reported that
Obama administration has paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital
projects in Kenya since Obama usurpation of POTUS. Obama’s Hawaii
birth certificate is an obvious fraud and a forgery, his Selective
Service registration are destroyed by Obama’s EO, Obama’s SS# failed
when checked through both E-Verify and the Social Security Number
Verification Service.
3 Does this Judiciary Committee agree that anyone who obtained a
federal government position of employment without verification of their
identity should be immediately arrested and investigated as a possible
domestic terrorist, and why are so many records destroyed or
unavailable: Obama’s mother’s passport records before 1965 were
destroyed; immigration records from August 1961, and Obama’s selective
service application destroyed; and, Obama’s purported original birth
certificate of Hawaii is non-existent and a forgery is presented —even
Hawaii governor Abercrombie admitted he could not find Obama’s BC in
Hawaii; Obama’s Social Security number is a stolen Connecticut SSN
042-68-4425 which was originally issued to Harrison J. Bounel who was
born in 1890?
4. What passport did Obama/Soetoro use when you traveled to Pakistan in 1981?
5. Why did Obama sign the EO to extend Secrete Service protection for
himself and W-Bush for Life instead of leaving it at 10-years?
Protecting elite CRIMINALS ? !!
6……etc, etc 1000 at least more questions to investigate about the Fraud President Barack H. Obama II
And, Impeach his now. AND ARREST Obama NOW into custody of US Marshalls in solitary until trial as domestic terrorist!
Please forward this message to all of the below and current Congresspeople and Senators.
mahalos, George Peabody
http://www.MolokaiAdvertiserNews.com 808-558-8253
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and SENATORS
Anibal@mail.house.gov,
gary_ackerman@mail.house.gov,
jay.inslee@mail.house.gov,
rick.larsen@mail.house.gov,
brian.baird@mail.house.gov,
adam.smith@mail.house.gov,
senator@boxer.senate.gov,
lynn.woolsey@mail.house.gov,
George.Miller@mail.house.gov,
sf.nancy@mail.house.gov,
barbara.lee@mail.house.gov,
budmail@mail.house.gov,
budmail@mail.house.gov,
snyder.congress@mail.house.gov,
faleomavaega@mail.house.gov,
ed.pastor@mail.house.gov,
democratic.caucus@mail.house.gov,
lynn.woolsey@mail.house.gov,
zoegram@lofgren.house.gov,
samfarr@mail.house.gov,
gary.condit@mail.house.gov,
lois.capps@mail.house.gov,
brad.sherman@mail.house.gov,
Howard.Berman@mail.house.gov,
arcoiris@mail.house.gov,
Rep.Harman@mail.house.gov,
Millender.McDonald@mail.house.gov,
talk2geb@mail.house.gov,
loretta@mail.house.gov,
degette@mail.house.gov,
david.skaggs@mail.house.gov,
Kennelly@mail.house.gov,
bozrah@mail.house.gov,
rep.boyd@mail.house.gov,
thurman@mail.house.gov,
pdeutsch.pub@mail.house.gov,
alcee.pubhastings@mail.house.gov,
cymck@mail.house.gov,
john.lewis@mail.house.gov,
guamtodc@mail.house.gov,
neil.abercrombie@mail.house.gov,
leach.ia01@mail.house.gov,
rep.boswell.ia03@mail.house.gov,
bobby.rush@mail.house.gov,
luis.gutierrez@mail.house.gov,
danny.davis@mail.house.gov,
sidney.yates@mail.house.gov,
jfc.il12@mail.house.gov,
lane.evans@mail.house.gov,
tim.roemer@mail.house.gov,
in09.wyr@housemail.house.gov,
rep.carson@mail.house.gov,
john.olver@mail.house.gov,
jim.mcgovern@mail.house.gov,
mtmeehan@mail.house.gov,
joe.moakley@mail.house.gov,
william.delahunt@mail.house.gov,
rep.cardin@mail.house.gov,
rep.tomallen@mail.house.gov,
stupak@mail.house.gov,
jim.barcia-pub@mail.house.gov,
debbie.stabenow@mail.house.gov,
dkildee@mail.house.gov,
david.bonior@mail.house.gov,
slevin@mail.house.gov,
john.conyers@mail.house.gov,
martin.sabo@mail.house.gov,
tell.bill@mail.house.gov,
tocollin.peterson@mail.house.gov,
oberstar@mail.house.gov,
gephardt@mail.house.gov,
ike.skelton@mail.house.gov,
thompsonms2nd@mail.house.gov,
gene.taylor@mail.house.gov,
EClayton1@mail.house.gov,
bob.etheridge@mail.house.gov,
david.price@mail.house.gov,
CongMcIntyre@mail.house.gov,
nc12.public@mail.house.gov,
Rep.Earl.Pomeroy@mail.house.gov,
rob.andrews@mail.house.gov,
bill.pascrell@mail.house.gov,
steven.rothman@mail.house.gov,
thomas.manton@mail.house.gov,
jerrold.nadler@mail.house.gov,
major.owens@mail.house.gov,
rep.carolyn.maloney@mail.house.gov,
rangel@mail.house.gov,
jserrano@mail.house.gov,
mike.mcnulty@mail.house.gov,
mhinchey@mail.house.gov,
louiseny@mail.house.gov,
mike.oxley@mail.house.gov,
ted.strickland@mail.house.gov,
rep.kaptur@mail.house.gov,
sherrod@mail.house.gov,
telljim@mail.house.gov,
rep.elizabeth.furse@mail.house.gov,
write.earl@mail.house.gov,
peter.defazio@mail.house.gov,
darlene@mail.house.gov,
paul.kanjorski@mail.house.gov,
murtha@mail.house.gov,
mchale@mail.house.gov,
rep.doyle@mail.house.gov,
robert.weygand@mail.house.gov,
jclyburn@mail.house.gov,
bob.clement@mail.house.gov,
bart.gordon@mail.house.gov,
john.tanner@mail.house.gov,
hford@hr.house.gov,
max.sandlin@mail.house.gov,
rmhall@mail.house.gov,
nick.lampson@mail.house.gov,
lloyd.doggett@mail.house.gov,
Rep.Hinojosa@mail.house.gov,
silvestre.reyes@mail.house.gov,
tx18@lee.house.gov,
texas17@mail.house.gov,
martin.frost@mail.house.gov,
ken.bentsen@mail.house.gov,
ask.gene@mail.house.gov,
rep.e.b.johnson@mail.house.gov,
owen.pickett@mail.house.gov,
rep.goode@mail.house.gov,
jim.moran@mail.house.gov,
ninthnet@mail.house.gov,
Donna.Green@mail.house.gov,
bernie@mail.house.gov,
adam.smith@mail.house.gov,
ron.kind@mail.house.gov,
jerry4wi@mail.house.gov,
telltom@mail.house.gov,
jay.johnson@mail.house.gov,
bobwise@mail.house.gov,
nrahall@mail.house.gov,
John_McCain@McCain.senate.gov,
senator@akaka.senate.gov,
senator@biden.senate.gov,
senator_bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov,
senator@breaux.senate.gov,
senator_byrd@byrd.senate.gov,
senator_carnahan@carnahan.senate.gov,
senator@clinton.senate.gov,
senator@conrad.senate.gov,
senator@dodd.senate.gov,
senator@dorgan.senate.gov,
dick@durbin.senate.gov,
russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov,
senator@feinstein.senate.gov,
bob_graham@graham.senate.gov,
tom_harkin@harkin.senate.gov,
vermont@jeffords.senate.gov,
tim@johnson.senate.gov,
senator@kennedy.senate.gov,
john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov,
senator_kohl@kohl.senate.gov,
senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov,
senator@levin.senate.gov,
blanche_lincoln@lincoln.senate.gov,
senator@mikulski.senate.gov,
senator_murray@murray.senate.gov,
senator@billnelson.senate.gov,
jack@reed.senate.gov,
senator@rockefeller.senate.gov,
senator@schumer.senate.gov,
senator@stabenow.senate.gov,
senator_torricelli@torricelli.senate.gov
Ms. Rexrode
Please pass this message to Chairman Goodlatte: Sir, I am a 26 year
military veteran (retired) and not prone to rush judgments. I have
looked at in detail the documentation that Attorney Orly Taitz has
accumulated regarding President Obama’s eligibility to serve in that
office. I have watched with increasing alarm as those in our government
and particularly our judiciary at various levels have chosen to ignore
the evidence and instead attack the messenger or resort to
technicalities to avoid doing their job. I am more concerned now about
the future of our country than I have ever been. The media of course is
so biased as to be not even worthy of listening to. Letters I have
written to my representatives have resulted in just boilerplate replies
none of which confront the issues. It is way past time to address this
concern head-on and quit worrying that others will call us “birthers” or
other stupid things. I prefer they call me a “truther” because that is
what I am after. Only YOU can get to the truth. We 300+ million citizens
rely on YOU 500+ government representatives (Exec, Congress, SC) to do
what is right.
Please investigate at once the processes used by the administrators
and the justices themselves to review this case (Noonan et al). What
has apparently happened so far is frightening. We all took an oath to
support and defend our constitution. Those who do not do so or who
believe it is their job to ignore and change our constitution should do
the honorable thing and immediately resign. As Gen MacArthur said ” a
million ghosts” will rise up shouting “Duty Honor Country”.
You must look at every shred of evidence regarding President
Obama’s SSN, his Selective Service Registration, his student status, and
the other issues raised by Ms. Taitz (who has nothing to gain from this
and has been subjected to cruel and vile ridicule) and the
experts involved. I could care less what his grades were. My opinion is
he should be proud to show his accomplishments at college as an example
to all our children of what can be done if we work hard. But he seals
his up so no one can see. Why? Time will eventually tell us but I do not
believe we can wait long. The future of our children is at stake. The
Supreme Court must be investigated now.
Thank you,
Richard Brewer, COL (Ret) USAF
San Antonio TX
Dr. Orly,
Great work with your SCOTUS attempt however we knew the outcome
before you stared. After 100,000′s of emails, letters + petitions one
might assume these tactics “Ain’t gonna work”.
Maybe it’s time for ‘Plan B’!!!
You are a true Patriot,
Harry Butler
Navy SEAL
Today, in one day over 2,000 people signed the petition to the US
Congress to investigate Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs, we have
nearly 36,000 signatures and not one employee in the department of
Justice, judge or Congressman, who stood up against high treason.
What do we do next?
If such in your face most despicable act of treason can be committed, what do we have left?
I believe that if people do not protest and are not in the streets,
in front of the faces of our corrupt Congressmen, Senators, US
Attorneys, AGs and Judges, nothing will happen, this crime of the
century will continue.
Please, call all of the talk shows. You have to be in the face of the
treasonous and corrupt members of the media. Limbaugh, Hannity, Levine,
O’Reilly are not much better than the liberal media. They all know the
facts and they are all complicit. You can disrupt their programs in a
way that they are not capable of talking about anything else, but
the criminal in the WH. I am appalled by the fact that on the radio and
TV these puppets are talking about any garbage, but not the crime of the
century. Call the shows under a pretence of talking about something
else. When you are on the air, suddenly address these media scoundrels
and ask them “Michael Medved, please explain the audience, why are you
committing treason and covering up the fact that Obama is using forged
IDs and a stolen Social Security number?’. When one after another
listeners are sticking this in their faces and they can’t talk about
anything else, the regime puppets will be forced to start talking about
this crime of the century or get off the air.
You have to do it during meetings with every congressman, judge or any other governmental official.
Please, go to the office of your congressman or senator, particularly
ones who claim to be conservatives and have someone take pictures or
video of you with a sign “Marco Rubio, when will you stop committing
treason and stop covering up Obama’s forged and stolen IDs?’ Republicans
are as corrupt as Democrats.
You have to get in their faces.
Remember one basic fact: today this criminal enterprise is stealing
the White House, tomorrow they will steal your house!!! the same corrupt
and treasonous Department of Justice, judges, congressmen and
senators will steal your house and everything you have. That is why
they are pushing so hard to take away your guns. Either they will win or
you will win. If you sit like a piece of furniture in front of your TV
and do nothing, they will win. If you organize your friends, neighbors,
relatives and start protests and get in their faces, you have a chance
of winning!!! there are 315 million of us and maybe 1,000 of them.
Reference for Dr. Orly Taitz
|
|
|
|
|
|
to kathryn.rexrode, me, cyndee_hill
|
|
Dear Ms. Rexrode,
I am a West Point graduate and spent 14 years in service to my Country to include combat in Vietnam.
Along with millions of other citizens, I have witnessed the complete
breakdown of the rule of law regarding the eligibility of Barack Obama
to be the President of the United States and about crimes that he has
personally committed. He is the chief law enforcement officer in the
Country and his Attorney General controls the FBI. Neither are about to
investigate these issues. The Supreme Court is cowering in fear of
something or refuses to get involved in something they may call
“politics”. Since when are crimes called politics?
Dr. Orly Taitz, a true American hero, has tirelessly been shouting on
the deaf ears of those who have sworn to preserve, protect and defend
the Constitution of the United States. Now, only the House of
Representative can investigate and begin impeachment proceedings to
remove a usurper from the highest office in the land.
Please, for the love of our Country, bring these issues to the
attention of the members of the House Judiciary Committee. Do this by
introducing Dr. Taitz to the Committee as she is the most knowledgeable
on all these issues. She, a naturalized citizen from Russia, is the
greatest patriot I have ever witnessed.
The most egregious crimes in the history of our great nation are
being committed under our watch and we must do whatever is necessary to
save our Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Hill, III
USMA 1965
DR. ORLY TAITZ ESQ
29839 SANTA MARGARITA, STE 100
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688
ORLY.TAITZ@GMAIL.COM
PH.949-683-5411 FAX 949-683-5483
ORLYTAITZESQ.COM
02.20.2013
Open letter to the President of Israel Shimon Peres
Office of the President
3 Hanassi St., 92188 Jerusalem
Tel: 972-2-6707211
Fax: 972-2-5610037
from Attorney Orly Taitz
Dear Mr. Peres,
I understand that recently you decided to reciprocate the Medal of
Freedom that was given to you by Mr. Obama and give him a Presidential
award of Distinction.
Please, see the attached briefs and documents that show that Mr.
Obama is engaged in the most serious crimes of elections fraud and use
of forged and stolen IDs for the purpose of the elections fraud.
Mr. Obama is a citizen of Indonesia. He became a citizen of
Indonesia when he resided there from 1969-1971 with his mother and step
father, citizen of Indonesia Lolo Soetoro. Obama is not even his legal
name. Attached passport of his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, show his last
name to be Soebarkah. He was born in Kenya, as evidenced by statements
of the Minister of Kenya James Orengo, his own biography and the sworn
affidavit from the assistant clerk of the Registrar of Hawaii. He is
using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never
assigned to him according to official governmental agencies E-Verify and
SSNVS and was actually assigned to a Jewish Immigrant from Russia
Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel (Mr. Bounel was a neighbor of your cousin
Betty Persky, as he resided at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY between
1935-1940) and Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro is using a computer generated
forgeries claiming those to be valid copies of a genuine birth
certificate and Selective Service certificate. There are multiple legal
actions in courts today seeking to remove him from office and prosecute
him for elections fraud and use of forged IDs, as well as seeking to
prosecute corrupt governmental officials, U.S. attorneys and Judges, who
aided and abetted him. I now that you and your first cousin, Betty
Persky, who under pseudonym Lauren Bacall became a famous and beloved
U.S. actress, escaped from Poland and were spared the Holocaust. 65
million people around the world, among them 6 million Jews died due to
actions of Adolf Hitler. Hitler’s reign of terror started in 1932 when
corrupt German judges and corrupt members of Reichstag looked the other
way and did not take a stand against the Constitutional violations of
Hitler. Not one single German judge found Hitler’s actions to be
unconstitutional.
Today in the United States of America we reached the level of
corruption and lawlessness which resembles Nazi Germany in the 1930s or
Stalinist Soviet Union of 1917-1977 or Jihadist Iran today. If World
Community does not rise in helping the U.S. citizens in fighting this
corruption and criminality in the U.S. Government, Congress and
Judiciary, USA will become another NAZI Germany of 1940s.
You are planning to give Obama a medal of distinction. The question
is: distinction in what? In criminality? In using all forged and stolen
IDs? In fraud? In usurpation of the constitutional rights of the U.S.
citizens?
You came from a family of well known Rabbis. Would they be proud of
you giving a medal to a criminal? For 68 years you were married to your
wife Sonia, who fought for justice during WW2 and beyond. Would she be
proud of you giving a medal of distinction to a criminal?
Obama’s presence in the White House is the biggest embarrassment to
this nation. You giving him a presidential award of Distinction will be
the biggest embarrassment to the state of Israel.
Please, write to Mr. Obama and seeking verification of the
information provided in the attached pleadings before you give the
aforementioned award and embarrass the state of Israel, before you give
an award that will need to be taken back.
Sincerely,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit
| Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 |
Docketed: 10/31/2011
Termed: 05/25/2012 |
| Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
| Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue |
| Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Fee Status: Fee Paid |
|
| Case Type Information: |
| 1) Civil US |
| 2) United States |
| 3) |
| |
|
| Originating Court Information: |
| District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL |
Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL |
| Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District JudgeDate Filed: 02/16/2011Date Order/Judgment:Date NOA Filed:08/30/201110/25/2011 |
|
| 04/27/2012 |
|
MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for
default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012)
[Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 05/25/2012 |
|
PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304] |
| 06/04/2012 |
|
PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly
Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail]
Pages: 16-20. [11-5304] |
| 06/20/2012 |
|
SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304] |
| 07/30/2012 |
|
MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to
recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012)
[Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] |
| 08/02/2012 |
|
CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon
consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is
ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot. No mandate has issued in
this case. A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the
court. The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v.
Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court. [1387271-2] [11-5304] |
| 08/09/2012 |
|
PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304] |
| 08/29/2012 |
|
MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304] |
| 01/29/2013 |
|
MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS"] [1417882] by
Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on
02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with
attachments. [11-5304] |
| 02/19/2013 |
|
MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] [1421271] by Orly Taitz. (Response
to Motion served by mail due on 03/04/2013) [Service Date: 02/18/2013 by
US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11- |
|
 |
| Benjamin Francis Cooley commented on his video of you. |
| Benjamin wrote: “It’s not over Kathleen, not by a long shot. It just
means peaceful redress has been exhausted. Now comes blood.” |
|
|
Attention Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives
Attention Chairman Congressman Bob Goodlatte
c/o Committee staff member Kathryn Rexrode.
As an American Citizen and Combat Veteran I demand a immediate
hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a CT SSN,
which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as well as criminal complicity and
cover up by high ranking officials of the U.S. Government, Social
Security Administration and employees of a number of courts. Over 34,000
citizens signed this petition as can be seen on OrlyTaitzESQ.com.
34,000 U.S. citizens are demanding an
Dear Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives c/o Committee staff member Kathryn Rexrode.
Please initiate immediate a hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s
use of forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as
well as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of
the U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a
number of courts.
Investigation to start with these:
1. Is Harry J. Bounel the President of the United States who filed
his 2009 federal tax return using his lawfully issued Social Security
#042-68-4425? AND, why is Barack H. Obama II aka Barry Soetoro using on
his 2009 federal tax return a stolen Social Security #042-68-4425, that
belongs to one of his wife’s relatives named Harrison J. Bounel whose
date of birth was 1890?
2. Barack H. Obama II aka Barry Soetoro admitted in 1991 publication of
his bio that he was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii. Since then his
grandmother provided his Kenyan birth certificate and stated she was
present at his birth in Kenya; and Obama/Soetoro and Michelle Obama have
stated that Kenya is the land of his birth; and Prior to Obama’s
ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated
that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative
assembly who celebrated for the record about their Kenyan boy who rules
the United States of America.
Furthermore, it has been reported that Obama administration has paid
nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya since Obama
usurpation of POTUS. Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is an obvious
fraud and a forgery, his Selective Service registration are destroyed by
Obama’s EO, Obama’s SS# failed when checked through both E-Verify and
the Social Security Number Verification Service.
3 Does this Judiciary Committee agree that anyone who obtained a federal
government position of employment without verification of their
identity should be immediately arrested and investigated as a possible
domestic terrorist, and why are so many records destroyed or
unavailable: Obama’s mother’s passport records before 1965 were
destroyed; immigration records from August 1961, and Obama’s selective
service application destroyed; and, Obama’s purported original birth
certificate of Hawaii is non-existent and a forgery is presented —even
Hawaii governor Abercrombie admitted he could not find Obama’s BC in
Hawaii; Obama’s Social Security number is a stolen Connecticut SSN
042-68-4425 which was originally issued to Harrison J. Bounel who was
born in 1890?
4. What passport did Obama/Soetoro use when you traveled to Pakistan in 1981?
5. Why did Obama sign the EO to extend Secrete Service protection for
himself and W-Bush for Life instead of leaving it at 10-years?
Protecting elite CRIMINALS ? !!
6……etc, etc 1000 at least more questions to investigate about the Fraud President Barack H. Obama II
And, Impeach his now. AND ARREST Obama NOW into custody of US Marshalls in solitary until trial
