BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for FRIDAY - SUNDAY Feb, 15 -17 2013
TELLING
THE RIGHT WING MEDIA HOW TO DO ITS JOB in public is done on a regular
basis casually online among conservatives, but it's time we stepped up
the game and started making the activity a bit more formal and direct.
Hannity, O'Reilly and the rest at FOX NEWS have created a pretty cute
game: blaming "mainstream media" for faults of which they themselves are
also guilty, while they themselves, with the highest ratings on cable,
also absolutely qualify by any measure as "mainstream media". Repeat: Fox News is also Mainstream Media. Play-pretending to not be what they are while projecting their own failures on others has got to stop.
Here
are 2 very recent examples of the media handling Benghazi, a right way
and a wrong way, from February 14, 2013 - last night as of this writing.
The first one is HOW YOU DO IT RIGHT.
It is the excellent Bret Baier on his nightly cablecast
interviewing Benghazi hawk GOP Senator Lindsey Graham - Graham one of
the few true heroes exposing the Benghazi outrage.
Baier asks Graham what needs to be asked: What about the survivors? Benghazi-Truth
only gives this exchange a 70% approval rating because it discusses
only procuring the now-hidden records of the FBI/CIA questioning of the
witnesses the night of the killings, and not the more salient issue of
demanding that the Obama administration release the names of the witnesses so Congress can call them to testify directly. But compared to other news outlets and Fox personalities, it's badly needed Manna From Heaven.
IMO here now is how it is not done.
When some of us tweeted Greta Van Susteren, the 10:00 PM EST host of
Fox News' "On The Record", she, in her brief responses, gets clearly
snippy and asks us - the people - to basically set up an interview for her worth probably a million bucks.
That instead of doing the kind of investigative journalism she has
displayed on things such as the Van Der Sloot case. IMO, disgraceful
responses (click each image for larger, easy-to-read images).
After
this first exchange, Greta took what looks at first blush like a
meaningful first step, but without mentioning this most important
possible of political stories on her TV show, only the following
Twitter post, she appears to be only throwing a bone to look busy so she
no longer has to deal with the issue thereafter. In the new global town
hall of Twitter, assuming your audience is stupid enough to not see
this for what it is, is IMO not the way to do it.
As
always, I remain convinced, now, as do many others, that Obama wanted
the people in Benghazi dead. With so many options to save them, it seems
that the only way they could be dead today is if he wanted them dead.
Here were just a few of Obama's options to save them:
1. Remove them from Benghazi when Britain realized the danger was so severe they pulled their people out.
2. Remove them from Benghazi when Stevens sent his first cable saying they could not survive an attack they felt was coming
3. Remove them from Benghazi when Stevens sent his second cable saying they could not survive an attack they felt was coming
4. Send them military protection when the first or second warning cable from Stevens came or when Britain got out.
5. Send them to the Annex and fortify the Annex with military when the first or second warning from Stevens came.
7. Send military immediately when attack first detected.
And
now that we know there are 25-30 survivor witnesses, confirmed by
Hillary Clinton in her congressional testimony, who have not been seen
or heard from for 5 months after the military flew them out. Not one
stepping forward to tell, not one requested by Obama to tell a story,
Obama fighting Congress to keep their stories from being heard. For all
we know Obama has had them all killed and is waiting for our interest to
get distracted and go away from Benghazi. We have nothing to go on but a
pop culture assumption that Obama must be too good for that because
he's our President, and from Hitler & Stalin onward, we have seen
what happens when "enlightened people" look away from the facts.
IMO, if left to people like Greta van Susteren, Obama will get his wish.
On
Monday, President's Day, we want to get everyone who comes in once in a
while and tweets with the crowd and make a huge crowd activity of it,
Tweeting both GOP congress and Media.
Join us.
************************************
Here's
another outstanding guest memo by BT's resident military expert,
"Sergeant Major". Read this carefully: he makes some very important
points no one else has made.
GUEST BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Tuesday Feb 12, 2013
NOTE:
Unsurprisingly, this has been a particularly popular Daily Memo, so
Benghazi-Truth will keep it as the top memo until Feb 15. THIS IS A
MUST-READ.
By Sergeant Major
Last
week the Senate Armed Forces Committee conducted a hearing into the
#BENGHAZI Massacre. Five major players emerged: Senators McCain, Ayotte
and Graham who "questioned" Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Joint
Chief of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey. The hearing followed
other #BENGHAZI hearings in that alibis were in abundance and true facts
rare as a Bible in Baghdad One such fact did emerge-a big one-so stand
by for that.
General
Dempsey was an embarrassment. In an ill tailored uniform (sleeves too
short revealing 3" of shirt cuff where regs allow for no more than a
half inch), the General slouched in his chair, leaned on his elbows and
answered questions with a subtle smirk on his face. His testimony began
with "Yes", "No", and multiple "Yeahs" (!) instead of "Yes Sir or No
Ma'am" as required by military courtesy. More to the point, his
sometimes confused responses were a smorgasbord of the "not my fault",
"have a lot on my plate", "you'll have to ask someone else" variety. No
wonder his command failed at #BENGHAZI. To quote Patton as he reviewed
his new troops in Tunisia, "They don't look like soldiers. They don't
act like soldiers. How do you expect them to fight like soldiers?"
Secretary
of Defense Panetta was a little better. Affecting an avuncular, even
lugubrious style, Panetta was rarely shaken or goaded into intemperate
("What does it matter how they died!?") remarks. He has survived around
Beltway Power in a variety of positions and knows how it works. He
realizes that OBAMA is his boss and must do what he can to protect him
but not at the expense of his own career. In other words, Panetta won't
stab OBAMA in the back but he won't fall on his sword for him either. As
such, it was Panetta that gave up the new factoid.
Of
the three senators, McCain was least effective though he did take
General Dempsey to task for his "surreal" testimony. This upbraiding was
deserved but not germane to what happened at #BENGHAZI. Senator Ayotte
was a touch too wordy, but her questions stayed on target-what was done
to defend #BENGHAZI-which elicited a patronizing, disrespectful response
from the General.
It
was Senator Lindsey Graham that tore Panetta/Dempsey a new one. His
rat-a-tat questions, interruptions of filibustering answers ("I'm Sorry
to interrupt you, but I have only so much time") and stern tone kept
Panetta/Dempseys' feet to the fire. Graham's questions extracted a
scenario of a command in disarray and confusion with no one truly
calling the shots. Graham: "Who was in charge that night?" Panetta,
shrugging:"I guess we all were in charge that night."
But the best salvo came at the end.
Graham: "Was there any soldier...of any kind...deployed from any base... anywhere... enroute to support #BENGHAZI?"
The
Secretary of Defense and the General fumbled for an answer until
Panetta stammered, "No, because we couldn't get there in time."
To which Graham barked, "How did you know 'in time'? You didn't know before it was over when it would end."
The
Big Fact revealed by Panetta was that OBAMA was AWOL that night.
According to the Secretary, he and the General had a 20-30 minute
briefing with the President at 5;00 pm Washington time where OBAMA was
apprised of the deteriorating situation in #BENGHAZI. The President was
distracted, detached and offered little guidance except, "Do what you
can." All night long OBAMA did not ONCE talk to them either to ask or
answer questions involving the staus of the situation at #BENGHAZI. This
is important. Without rehashing a previous blog on Chain of Command,
suffice to say before ANY rescue force of ANY kind can militarily enter
Libyan airspace or violate Libyan boundaries these forces would first
receive Presidential authorization, referred to as "Cross Border
Authority". If OBAMA wanted #BENGHAZI to burn and the Ambassador to die
all he need to do was make himself incommunicado, thus hamstringing the
rescue effort. "Not To Act Is To Act" And that's exactly what a sleeping
OBAMA did.
Still,
the question remains. According to reports, a "Stand Down" order was
given that night of 9/11/12. Since Hillary, Panetta, Demsey deny they
gave the order, and OBAMA was sleeping, SOMEONE on the White House staff
played President that night and Stood Down the rescue.
WHO GAVE THE ORDER TO STANDDOWN AT #BENGHAZI?
EDITOR:
Since Sergeant Major's Memo has been up for 2 days, I don't feel too
disrespectful to reiterate what my own feeling his here so the reader
knows where this blog stands on the issue generally; in the second to
last paragraph, Sergeant Major notes that if Obama wanted to kill
everyone in Benghazi, he needed do nothing more than turn his back and
remain uncommunicative to questions and answers. It has become my own
conviction that Obama did, indeed, want everyone in Benghazi dead. After
all these months, only one scenario seems to hold together and fit:
For whatever reason, possibly to cover gun-running, an operation Rand
Paul believes was likely, IMO Obama, probably in concert with
the Libyan Government whose propaganda about the killing being caused by
a mob incensed by an anti-Muslim video was clearly the lead for Obama's
own lie on the cause of the killings, decided that all in Benghazi must
die. This seems extremely likely as Obama had many opportunities before
and during Sept 11, 2012 to send reinforcements or get the people out
and he very clearly intentionally did neither. With so many options to
help them, it seems clear that the only way those people could be dead
today is if Obama wanted them dead. What would have gone wrong, then, is
the two ex-SEALS breaking ranks and saving 25-30 unwanted witnesses,
and that too holds, since Obama is steadfastly refusing to give up any
information to Congress about the identity or location of the witnesses
after 5 months, information usually offered to Congress within 48 hours
of similar events. None of the witnesses have stepped forward, nor their
families, and this is of course fraught with alarming, Nazi-esque
implications of unconstitutional holding or worse. As melodramatic and
truly unprecedented that may sound for a situation in the United States
of America, that is how the facts shake out. The people of this country
are not stupid. We need to hear the witnesses and we need to hear them
now.
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for FRIDAY - SUNDAY Feb 8-10 2013
THERE
IS A LITTLE HOPE in this Benghazi murder cover-up scandal, and it's
coming from a few Senators and GOP House Reps, whose motivation, I
believe, is now coming from a successful growing movement, started here -
and on Twitter, particularly, where Kathy Amidon has volunteered to
lead the charge.
More
and more people are dipping their toe into the water of online activism
about Benghazi, and wake up the following morning still free and
associating with the same friends from the night before. They awaken to
the enraging realization that for years they have been terrified into
political inaction by smoke and mirrors about black helicopters,
activists disappearing into the night and impossible computer tracking
technology that threatens to steal them away into the blackness from
whence no man returns. But no, the following day the sun shines and
after a week, then two, then three, and seeing that activists who have
been at it for months are still free, they realize they were literally
scared of nothing. Then they get angry. They then jump into the water
fully. And therein lies the hope. The Tea Party is being reborn into a
much more powerful force, driving our own Reps and Senators with a fear
more legitimate than any left-wing paranoid fantasy: the people they
need to elect them are getting mad - at them - and telling the world on
social media where the lamestream media cannot save
those politicians with mockery and silence.
So
far this activity is just now picking up steam and the numbers are
still very small: about a core of a dozen and a half regulars and
maybe half that many poking their noses in once in a while to be sure
the paranoid fantasies really were just lies after all. This memo is for
you: It's safe - and America needs you to jump in fully.
The
activity is really ridiculously simple: just follow whoever is leading,
usually @Kathy_Amidon on twitter in the early evenings, and simply
voice your desire for the politicians being "spoken to" at the moment to
get off their lazy asses, quite bluntly, and earn the tax money that
pays them
and
get to work on finding the missing Benghazi witness/survivors Obama has
hidden somehow and made to "go away". The message is, do it or find new
jobs in 2014.
By
posting in the reply areas of their own bragadocious posts where your
displeasure cannot be erased or silenced, you humiliate them in front of
their constituents and sow the seeds of discontent for the upcoming
election. In other words, we are back to the good old days when
Americans in the town square could decide - themselves, without being at
the mercy of a censoring media - whether a politician would survive the
next election, motivating him to actually work hard enough that on
occasional mornings he might even forget to stop at the shoeshine boy,
lest he miss an opportunity and find himself back with the peasants
earning an honest living like the rest of us.
So
for your education and inspiration to get involved, here are a
few illustrations of this activity. If a small proportion of my
followers alone of 1,150 (I follow 20)when others have so many more,
added just one comment to a few threads Kathy and others lead every day,
it would absolutely and totally freeze their continued political
ambitions cold in a heartbeat until they had convinced the world -
to their own suddenly cold-sweat satisfaction - that Benghazi had been
addressed to it's proportionate necessity compared to Watergate: by a
factor of 100.
It's so easy. It's incredibly
easy. And yet we are already seeing a big uptick by the GOP in their
attention to Benghazi. As our "Pal" GOP Representative Rohrabacher has
volunteered, the GOP has started reading this blog - and they certainly
read their own twitter threads. They know we're here, they know we're
mad, they know we have figured out the secret to beating the media and
they know we intend to lay their political futures to absolute waste in
the next few months if they do not do their jobs on Benghazi to
our satisfaction That's not weird, arrogant, presumptive, irrational
or any other similar demeaning negative - this is nothing more or less
than the way our Forefathers meant our country to be Governed. And we
are doing it. With loud, angry and impatient determination. The
shoeshine boy, bless his heart, can wait - there is work they need to do
first. Here are a few examples (click on each image for the
more-easily-readable full size):
This
incredibly quick, simple, easy, harmless (to you) and absolutely, 100%
necessary activity is not for squares, crazies, hyperventilating
conspiracy theorists or people ridiculously dressed as Uncle Sam on the
4th of July. It is for any citizen who just maybe happens to give a damn
about what is happening to America.
Try
it. You'll like it. After being marginalized by the media
into believing your voice is a hopelessly mocked collection of noises
and liberals have scared you into being sure that terror awaits any mere
expression of political defiance, you will be astonished at how fresh
and free you'll feel when you see your voice really is smart outside of
your immediate group of friends, makes a difference, and has real power
to change the world. You have waited a long time for this moment.
Go for it.
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Sat/Sun/ Feb 2/3 2013-to-?
EDIT:
Moderate my palpable anger a bit given the above more recent Memo, but
I am told by some of the more recently involved activists that this
post, below, is what motivated them to take the action illustrated
above, so it will remain.
ARE
YOU BETRAYING AMERICA? It's a serious question because there is no
neutral political inaction in America when the President is an obvious
Marxist communist whose health care will determine if you live or die,
wants to take your guns away, raise your taxes through the roof, limit
your free speech, find any way possible to ensure liberal democrats
outnumber everyone else and at the very least chose to allow our
Ambassador and others in Benghazi to die and has somehow made the 30
witnesses to the atrocity vanish while a frightened and timid GOP
congress dithers about and looks for easier subjects to make it appear
that they are on the job today.
Most
of you, the 700 - 1,000 readers on an average day are here from
Twitter. Others and myself have outlined how you can help. We've given
you the GOP contact information. Suggested what you can say and the many
ways to say it. Supplied you with talking points and warned you of the
very real dangers associated with the implications of what happened in
Benghazi. I've shown you how history is repeating itself toward Soviet
Russia and Nazi Germany (the possible extent of that transformation
depends on the media, and as someone who works in it let me tell you
that most of the decision makers hate you so much that they will happily
go down in flames just for the sick satisfaction of knowing they took
you with them).
And
where have you been? Sometimes we have to beg you to so much as retweet
a Benghazi message. Is your thumb so weak that you have to stagger your
clicks on the mouse? While you posture like heroes and call those more
moderate "sheeple", what have you been doing? have you contacted your
congressman? Yes? really? That one letter, four telephone calls and 5
e-mails? You really think that is fractionally enough to make a dent?
You
need to contact as many GOP House members as you can - in public, on
Facebook and twitter where you can effect public opinion and
the politicians can see that and act accordingly to save their careers.
What happened today that set me off on this? I ask for people to gather
together tonight and help. Out of the 1,050 followers I have (most came
to the message, I only follow 22 myself) I see Kathy, Stan, Janson and
Deb taking the time to do anything. I may have missed a few, but So
what?
Is
this entertainment for you, to watch, be intrigued, watch others play
the show out while you comment and play critic and let everyone else do
the damn simplest things in the world so basic a moron could do them,
and yet illustrate by your inaction that such minuscule efforts are
simply too much trouble for you to bother, while expending volumes of
energy complaining at your friends?
I have heard "Frank/Proe, we need you to lead!"
I've done it plenty professionally over the years, so I know how,
certainly. Unfortunately, I also recognize a company full of people who
should be fired. But I cannot fire you and cannot replace you. All I can
do is watch you watching me and a few others while doing nothing
yourself. Therefore, I say this: " I need you to do something."
I'm
not Rush Limbaugh who pontificates like a pompous ass while never
rallying the energy of his millions of listeners, probably because if
they do not need saving, he is no longer relevant. Know this: IMO Rush
is the white conservative Jesse Jackson: he's out of business without a
collective people to save, so the balance remains tight to keep the
people baited while making sure they remain in a perpetual state of
needing to be saved.
I
am not Sean Hannity, a kid from Long island New York who, IMO, acts
like he grew up on country music and pickup trucks while he sucks the
conservative stereotype dry for millions a year, complaining about
gossip but never calling attention to the few things that could actually
damage Obama, like Arpiao's citizenship/records investigation or the
missing banghazi survivors.
If
you want to make a good resolution, stop patronizing them: You are in
the habit of passively listening to them and offering your own
watered-down versions of the act on the internet but not doing what the
left is doing and beating the living shit out of us by doing it:
engaging themselves politically actively.
Remember,
Obama has apparently secreted away 30 witnesses to an atrocity and even
Congressional members have acknowledged it while at the same time
treating it as no more than a political curiosity. You could be
next, and as long as no pressure is put on the GOP House, they will walk
through their halls of marble, smelling like expensive cologne and too
much starch, concentrating on one thing: to keep the game going at
election time, for God forbid, having been spoiled on a life like that,
they should ever return to a world requiring them to get a real job.
To show I mean what I say, I am going to start to sit back and watch you
for awhile, and that's fair, because I started this effort to win by
helping us all to expose the Benghazi cover-up to America, not so you
would have a little extra casual entertainment revolving around a
subject that happens to interest you. If that's all it is I'll spend my
evenings on the town and join the millions in this city who won't awaken
until the next 9/11. Maybe next time it will be your city. Maybe you'll
be the one killed when they strike again. Maybe in that last second
you'll think that you could have done more to expose a cancer in which
the DNA was made clear in Benghazi, and you were too busy waiting for
Rush to save you to bother.
So
no more memos, no more Benghazi Day Counts - nothing from me. If you
are offended by this and want to unfollow me, be my guest, because in
this town fair weather friends are a dime a dozen and I have more than I
can use as it is.
Will
Benghazi be exposed and see Obama prosecuted and end this nightmare, or
will Obama simply toss his head back and laugh in private, knowing you
could have stopped an agenda as outrageous as his, and failed because
you sent one e-mail, made three calls, chatted to your friends and
listened to Rush and thought that was enough.
They
say you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink. Well,
drink heavily from the internet while you can, because if you think that
if Obama regains the House in 2014 and won't restrict your internet for
the good of the state and imprison everyone against the state like
he imprisoned the film maker on whose video he blamed Benghazi,
knowingly putting that man's life in mortal danger for the rest of his
life, then, quite frankly, it might just be that with there being no
such thing as a neutral inaction, you have worked hard to earn his same
fate.
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Thursday/Friday, Jan 31/Feb 1, 2013
Please share so we're all on the same page strategically.
Ancient bamboo copy of "The Art of War" at the University of California, Riverside
"KNOW
THY ENEMY" is a famous quote attributed to an ancient Chinese military
treatise by General Sun Tzu called "The Art of War". It states, fully,
"Know thy self, know they enemies. A thousand battles, a thousand
victories." In The Art of War, there are several chapters which even
today are regarded as a pretty good template for winning a war. While
those who physically murdered our people in Benghazi reside in other countries, those who are keeping us from knowing the truth live and operate right here in the United States. Obama once referred to
Republicans to an Hispanic audience as "the enemy", while feigning,
Satan-like, the accent of those to whom he was speaking to gain their
trust. By Obama's own political precedent then, we can refer to Obama
as "the enemy" who is keeping us from knowing the truth, and keeping us
without the facts he is, clearly deliberately. Therefore, it might be of
some value to apply the tactics outlined in "The Art of War": to the
legal and political strategies to find out what happened in Benghazi.
First,
we need to understand that we have two enemies: Obama, and the GOP
House which seems determined to do nothing. This is not an assumption
wrongly concluded: Senator Lindsey Graham, Senator John McCain, Senator
Kelly Ayotte and other very high-ranking Senators are furious about the
Administration's handling of Benghazi. Graham has vowed not to confirm
any Obama appointment until the person presently in that point, if in
anyone way knowledgeable about Benghazi, has testified before the
Senate, and this includes Leon Panetta.
However,
the House is a different matter. The degree to which they are not
fulfilling their exclusive congressional oversight obligations is
becoming a nightmare. Nowhere is this better illustrated than the
following exchange from three nights ago between patriots, led by Kathy
Amidon, and so-called ranking Republican House member Dana Rohrabacher,
whose insensible defenses for not issuing subpoenas, rude and sarcastic
demeanor and absolutely not credible claim - illustrated in these
screenshots - that was not even aware of the Benghazi survivors
until the time of this conversation - three days ago - is infuriating,
clearly punctuated by untruth and makes him a clear example of someone
who is an "enemy" (your first instinct may be to assume that this is not
the real Representative Rohrabacher, but if you check that account, you
will see it is followed by his daughter and at least one other
rep, Jason Chaffetz, so this is the real deal):
Click on any of the images for a larger, easy-to-read version.
What
we have here, absolutely incredibly, is this: a confirmed ranking
Republican member of the US House of Representatives, the job of which
is oversight and investigation, claiming - literally - to be unaware of the fact that Benghazi survivors even existed -
not until Hillary testified months after everyone else was talking
about the survivors, but - until after when a video of Hillary
confirming the fact, was made available to him by - pardon my french,
but I must - shoving it under his big fat face on Twitter at Two
O'Clock in the frigging morning - a time of day, IMO, which
demonstrates that the Rep does not take his job seriously. That
is what we're up against, and it's pathetic, infuriating, and screams
"replace me in 2014", whether because of seeming unbelievably lazy
oversight incompetence or apparent lies because for whatever he may not
want Benghazi investigated while Senators of far greater prestige than
he has are demanding it. For anyone anxious for justice for the
Benghazi slain and the release by Obama of the Benghazi witnesses who
remain - where, nobody knows, not even congress - Rohrabacher is an
'enemy".
What
would Sun Tzu say about this? Let's apply the themes of the chapters of
his masterwork to the quest for attaining Benghazi-Truth:
Laying Plans/The Calculations explores the five fundamental
factors (the Way, seasons, terrain, leadership and management) and seven
elements that determine the outcomes of military engagements. By
thinking, assessing and comparing these points, a commander can
calculate his chances of victory.
Way:
motivate GOP House; Season: Now; Terrain: varied depending on Rep's
political constituency leanings; Leadership: Find the Benghazi hawks and
support them; management: motivate yourself into taking action on
twitter to talk to the Reps as soon as you are finished reading this
article.
Waging War/The Challenge explains how to understand the
economy of warfare and how success requires winning decisive engagements
quickly. This section advises that successful military campaigns
require limiting the cost of competition and conflict.
Way:
Convince the GOP House to act quickly and stress that our money is
being wasted by their delays as surely as it will be spend investigating
and prosecuting. More money, still, will be wasted by repeating these
mistakes if we do not find out not just how they were caused, but who
caused them, because those mistakes will continue until that Person
is legally removed from his authority to make such murderous blunder -
if it all wasn't intentional anyway - and that includes Obama.
Attack by Stratagem/The Plan of Attack defines the source of
strength as unity, not size, and discusses the five factors that are
needed to succeed in any war. In order of importance, these critical
factors are: Attack, Strategy, Alliances, Army and Cities.
Way:
Attack: convince the GOP House to prosecute Benghazi; Strategy: Tell
them Tea Party candidates will be found NOW to challenge them in 2014
primaries if action is not taken immediately. There is no longer any
reasonable excuse to delay.
Tactical Dispositions/Positioning explains the importance of
defending existing positions until a commander is capable of advancing
from those positions in safety. It teaches commanders the importance of
recognizing strategic opportunities, and teaches not to create
opportunities for the enemy.
Way:
Never give an inch of ground in an argument, as Kathy demonstrated
above. It's easier to get-long, harder to fight, easier to destroy,
harder to create. They work for us. You are the boss. Give it to them
straight: work or be fired, not give excuses and be re-hired. It's as
simple as that.
Energy/Directing explains the use of creativity and timing in building an army's momentum.
Way:
Get all your friends involved on Twitter, Direct message them and Group
tweet to set up times to gather on the reply area of a GOP House member
and have a discussion between yourselves. Talk of how the GOP needs to
get to work on Benghazi, and name any great replacements from the tea
Party that could be offered in in 2014 to replace them. Do it in public
on twitter. In other words, scare the living shit out of them so they
get off their asses and get to work.
Weak Points & Strong/Illusion and Reality explains how an
army's opportunities come from the openings in the environment caused by
the relative weakness of the enemy in a given area.
Way:
This was demonstrated by Kathy who boxed in Rohrabacher by
fairly exploring his own claim to not know that survivors existed by
making him appear ignorant in front of his constituents, either by
pointing out the true ignorance or by causing to backfire the lie of
ignorance. Either way, it put the Rep into an untenable position which
can now be fairly exploited forever.
Maneuvering/Engaging
The Force explains the dangers of direct conflict and how to win those
confrontations when they are forced upon the commander.
Way:
There are few direct disadvantages in confrontation in this war, but if
you are uneasy about it, get a friend or two to join you in
conversation in the response area of the Rep's latest post; talk about
how poorly they are performing on Benghazi and agree with each other
that a tea party alternative must be found quickly to replace that Rep.
Doing so in public like that is good motivation for the rep to do his or
her job of oversight and investigation.
Variation
in Tactics/The Nine Variations focuses on the need for flexibility in
an army's responses. It explains how to respond to shifting
circumstances successfully.
Way;
once again, Kathy showed how by throwing a video up when the Rep made
the astonishing remark of being unaware of the survivors. Ask twitter
friends for a video that makes your point if you feel stuck - we'll be
at your side in moments.(I DM'd a video link to Kathy, for example)
Start talking to
your twitter friends now, choosing a Rep or group of Reps, and start
calling them out now. Re-election to their easy jobs on the backs of the
people is all politicians have ever cared about. Threaten that and they
will work. This is nothing new. Doing it on twitter may be.
See you on the battlefield.
DAILY BENGHAZI-TRUTH EXCLUSIVE DAY-COUNT GRAPHIC JAN 29, 2013, DAY 143
DAILY BENGHAZI-TRUTH EXCLUSIVE DAY-COUNT GRAPHIC JAN 29, 2013, DAY 142
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Monday Jan 28 and Tuesday Jan 29, 2013
(I
am leaving this Daily Memo up for two consecutive work week days
because the issue of the Benghazi survivors is really becoming extremely
important. Media and related topics and the like are my business and
IMO this country is in very big trouble, now. Don't doubt it until you
read this)
EDIT: First things first - for the doubters, there are
Benghazi survivors. In this video at 1:40 Johnson and Clinton discuss
them - Clinton says 25 - 30 people evacuated - before Hillary explodes
DESPITE
THE TEPID CONCERN DEMONSTRATED BY MOST GOP CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS and
the deafening silence of the mainstream media on the issue, it is
Benghazi-Truth's opinion that the 25-30 missing Benghazi survivors'
missing status - missing because Obama has taken them out of society -
poses the potential for the greatest crisis of freedom the United
States has ever known.
"Over-the-top"? Unfortunately, no.
The
missing Benghazi survivors exist and that fact has been confirmed by
congress and even Hillary Clinton herself who in her Congressional
testimony claimed to know they existed and are in the possession of the
U.S. Government (but not know anything else despite the fact that the
survivors, employed at the Benghazi Consulate, worked directly for her.)
So right away we know something true and manifest and now undeniable:
for over four months, 20 - 30 U.S. citizen Government employees - not
military - are being hidden from society, not allowed to walk free among
their fellow citizens, in almost certain alarming violation
of their fundamental constitutional rights. This is not
a conspiracy theory; they are citizens of the United States and the
Obama administration will not tell even Congress who or where they are
after over four months, even when Congressional members press them for
an answer, as some have claimed to do. Our response, shouted loudly and
anxiously, must be "NO". That cannot be allowed to continue in the U.S.
after Obama and Clinton lied patently about the cause of the murders in
the first place, a fact that even mainstream media has been forced to
acknowledge. This situation constitutes a crisis because people in this
country cannot be spirited off on the whim of a President, lest such
casual, dictatorial activity be extended to you and me.
This
kind of thing is not new in the rest of the world, however, and as
always, it's time to learn some lessons from the past. At no time in
world history have citizens been whisked out of their society to good
moral and legal effect by the state - the reasons have always been bad
and usually horrendous. Let's look at some. But first, let's put the
narrative in perspective. Let's call the survivors by their significant
function relative to the Benghazi investigation; let's stop calling
them "survivors" now and call them what we need to begin calling them:
"The Witnesses".
When
witnesses are made to vanish by a Government, history teaches us
without exception that what happened to them was very bad. And let's
remind ourselves at every point that what happened to the Benghazi
witnesses can happen to you or me.
Also,
we need to correct assumptions that have led to a form of suicide by
the millions: people have always assumed "the past" is always some
distant and primitive epoch on
the timeline, measured today as though the citizens of Nazi Germany and
Communist countries like Russia and Cuba lived in some barbaric state
like cave men. No. They
too, believed they were in an enlightened age in which mass
communication like radio, telephones and widespread published media made
it absolutely impossible - they would assure themselves with a
confident and bemused chuckle - for another Caesar to emerge, and their
hubris about the sophistication of their society cost them the lives of
tens of millions, slaughtered mercilessly in mass bloodbaths by their
own governments.
Cable TV, the internet and Skype will not save us from the next Hitler
or Stalin. Current and future murderous tyrants will not be stopped by
those technological advances, they will utilize them,
and propagandists, anxious for the approval of cold-blooded dictators,
will carry their water today and into the future just as they have for
thousands of years past; human nature will not change, nor has it been
or will be changed by our "enlightened society", as defined by better
technology and mocking sarcasm about those on whose accomplishments we
today live a better life.
Hitler's minister of "Public Enlightenment", Joseph Goebbels, said, "We .. intend a principled transformation in the worldview of our entire
society, a revolution of the greatest possible extent that will leave
nothing out, changing the life of our nation in every regard ... It
would not have been possible for us to take power or to use it in the
ways we have without the radio and the airplane. It is no exaggeration
to say that the German revolution, at least in the form it took, would
have been impossible without the airplane and the radio."
Sound familiar?
It
is generally assumed that the concentration camps in Nazi Germany were
reserved for Jews and their torture and extermination. Untrue. Some were
used to condition, brainwash and re-create the minds of the opposition
in their society so they would become, in turn, those who then, too,
torture, murder - and brainwash - others. The first step is that these
people would vanish from society, as the Benghazi witnesses have
vanished from our society. In their day, too, politicians did what they
are doing now: timid of the unknown repercussions of difficult
decisions, did nothing while people vanished and leaders with uncertain
pasts and the worst possible political associations rose to absolute
power.
This is Theodor Eicke, who developed, ran and oversaw the Nazi concentration camp system.
Prisoners
stand at attention in the Nazi concentration camp Dachau. It was famous
for killing Jews. It was also one of the places used
to indoctrinate political dissidents into becoming "useful servants of
the Fatherland". These dissidents - and witnesses - did not enroll to be
there. They were taken out of society, seemingly as Obama has taken out
of society the 30 Benghazi witnesses.
Here
is an example of the result of being "trained" at Dachau: SS guards
assigned to the notorious concentration camp Mauthausen. After four
months we have no idea where the Benghazi witnesses are. Are they being
likewise 'trained"? The longer we wait and be timid about shouting for
the answers the American people deserve and to which they have every
right, the more difficult it will be to stop whatever is happening to
the witnesses, for certainly, something must be happening; people do not
exist in a literal state of limbo, their friends and families silenced
as surely as they have been.
For more about Dachau, though the information is everywhere, you might be interested in this BRIEF HISTORY.
When
Goebbels fell out of favor with Hitler for a while, this was the
result: removed from photographs - removed by people working for Hitler,
and a comparison could be drawn to whoever did the airbrushing to
people like Chris Matthews who in my opinion is a perfect example of
what Goebbels himself advocated: self-censorship on the part of the
media for the good of the Fatherland. Photos courtesy Dartmouth Edu
& used via the Fair Use Act.
"It's
impossible" is the refrain when witnesses vanish because people refuse
to suffer the emotional pain of disappointment today to save themselves
and their country from annihilation tomorrow.
Stalin was a truly dashing and smoulderingly handsome, charming revolutionary hero in Russia 1902.
He
grew into the epitome of the kind and benign leader whose only concern
was to help the people whom he loved and who loved him back, reading and
listening to him in their media, convinced that only lunatics would
accuse him of....
...
murdering 40 million of his own people for purely political purposes,
two of whom lie dead here in the frozen snow - a mother and her young
son. I will spare the reader the displeasure of photographs of Communist
Stalin's atrocities so vast they make Hitler's murders of the Jews look
like a mere admonishment for wrongdoing.
History
sees the same pattern in the beginning of Stalin's rein of terror as
Hitler and now Obama: Lies about the causes of deaths of politicians -
and ambassador's - are discovered, media controlled by willing
accomplices censor themselves to gain favor with the tyrant and
information re-created to suit the desires of the Government.
And
witnesses to Stalin's crimes vanished, just as surely as the Benghazi
victims cannot be identified or found, though all agree they do - or did
- exist. The people under Stalin were just as aware and awake as you
are reading this now. They were not uneducated. They were talented,
well-versed, often highly sophisticated who were well-read in the
classics, could quote without effort the great philosophers and excelled
in all the arts. They worshiped God publicly before Christian
references were outlawed in public. They listened to
media commentators praise Stalin for his leadership and mock the "crazy
people" who made claims so awful that they could not possibly be true to
a reasonable mind. They were not barbarians. They lived in an
enlightened, technological age in which no well-meaning citizen needed a
gun because Caesars were impossible. They loved and wrote, played and
performed, engaged in style and fashion, worked and thrived and laughed
at the town criers without checking the facts of their presumed
political absurdities. And the streets eventually ran deep in their own
blood.
You can read an interesting little thing along these lines at the New York Times, HERE
Communist
China's Chairman Mao: the same pattern. Witnesses to atrocities vanish,
guns taken from people who collectively believe their world is too
sophisticated for Caesars
and trust the media which voluntarily censors itself to gain favor with
the tyrant and the image the media painted of the benign, handsome,
loving and well-meaning leader. The photographs of the many thousands of
human heads of Mao's victims - the political opposition - stacked in
giant piles are too horrifying and nauseating to even begin to
contemplate publishing here.
Cuba's
murderous Castro in 1968; guns taken from people, media complicit -
fawning over the handsome, loving leader of all good people - and
censoring itself before being taken over by the tyrant they tried to
please, murders millions of the political opposition, and as seen here,
witnesses are made to disappear, and as always, their families also said
nothing when they vanished.
This
could go on forever. The pattern of Obama's political activity is
clear. But the fact that there are Benghazi witnesses who have vanished
means we can stop this madness legally right now; we can, though the GOP
House, demand all information on the witnesses who must then be
medically/psychologically evaluated and made sure to be who it is
claimed they are. This is not fun and games anymore. If Obama's pattern -
now including the hiding of witnesses to an atrocity - are half of what
it seems, then we must demand action - and make sure we get it - to
simply save ourselves. That means we have to do what most other citizens
in times past failed to do: we must motivate frightened and
feckless politicians to show courage they do not possess by instinct.
Warn them in the most severe possible terms of political loss in 2014 -
and put meat into the threat by openly, loudly and immediately calling
for tea party recruits to challenge them in the 2014 primaries. This
is all we have left. If we fail, we risk living - or worse - under
another Hitler, Stalin, Mao or Castro.
Look
at this simple video collection of bizarre public statements by Obama
and ask yourself if he should be trusted with the Benghazi witnesses
merely on faith of his good intentions and the picture of him painted by
the media.
"Over
the top"? Ask all those who also mocked the "crazy person" who warned
of horrific dangers because in their enlightened age, Caesars were
impossible; history books are full of pictures of their stiff, naked
corpses piled high by the millions.
FIND
THE BENGHAZI WITNESSES and be sure they have not been 'conditioned" and
are who they say they are. The time for good manners is over. The
pattern is clear and absolutely irrefutable with the advent of the
missing/hidden Benghazi witnesses: From any historical perspective
whatsoever, this is past a series of coincidences being a reasonable
explanation; this country appears to be on the verge of the worst crisis
in its history. But it can still be stopped.
I
never ask you to share and tweet these Daily Memos. I am asking you to
share this one. IMO this entire country is in much worse trouble than
all but a few may fully realize and appreciate. FIND THE BENGHAZI
WITNESSES and at least set this country back into some small sense of
balance before it's too late. Do it now.
**********************************************
SHOULD THE CONGRESS
AND RIGHT-WING MEDIA EVER CARE:
**********************************************
Originally posted on Dec 22, 2012
PROVED WITH VIDEO EVIDENCE:
THE SOURCE OF OBAMA'S BOGUS STORY ABOUT THE
BENGHAZI KILLINGS BEING DUE TO ANTI-MUSLIM VIDEO
Where did Obama's story about the Benghazi killings come from, which blamed a previously unknown video for the murders? OBAMA
AND HIS ADMINISTRATION SIMPLY PARROTED - VERBATIM - THE DETAIL-RICH BUT
ENTIRELY UNTRUE LIBYAN PROPAGANDA COMING FROM EASTERN NEWS/TELEVISION
SOURCES MERE HOURS AFTER THE KILLINGS ,ON SEPT 12, 2012.
If you don't think this is important, you need your head examined.
The video of news sources from the Middle East, above, proves it (check the upload date: Sept 12, 2012). Our media and leaders continue to ask and wonder,"Where did the talking points come from - the ones about the video that supposedly outraged the Muslim world?"
It came from Libyan Government Propaganda - released mere hours after the Benghazi attack - which Obama, Clinton and Rice repeated to everyone including the United Nations by Obama himself.
Incredibly, this evidence was found easily by doing a Youtube search of publicly available international news sources. This is something our media and politicians should have checked first.
It
is clear that the Obama Administration appears to have been acting
knowingly as the US distribution office of Libyan propaganda which blamed the US for instigating the killings of our own people. Interesting, it should be noted that worded differently, the
part about blaming the victims for their own deaths is the same
conclusion reached by the State Dept's own internal investigation which, in so doing, cleared itself. It's all coming from the same source: corrupt Libya propaganda sources.
Watch the video linked at the top of this article. Should
this video, linked above, vanish from the internet, it will be replaced
by our own copy which we will upload via the Fair Use Act. This is important.
ADDITIONAL
The
Libyan talking points in the eastern television news reports are
extremely precise and well-informed for the reporting on a "mob event"
that occurred less than 12 hours before the Government made its
explanation. They had supposedly in less than 12 hours pin-pointed a
video which caused an outrage. But that video caused no mob protest and
outrage, which suggests it had already been chosen to be the scapegoat
"cause" of premeditated murders by the - presumed - Libyan government
through terrorist operatives, otherwise the chances of all this
hand-in-glove timing would be extremely unlikely.
This
probably explains why Obama and Clinton sent Rice out to repeat the
bogus Libyan talking points. They did not want to be found to
be officially repeating the Libyan propaganda - which in-part accuses
the west of starting the violence via an imaginary scenario which
never occurred.
We continue to know that seven (7) hours went by in which Obama did not issue orders to help, but did apparently issue orders to stand down. There
has been much speculation that Stevens was either involved in or became
aware of gun-running sanctioned by the United States.
Therefore,
for Bengahzi-Truth, for whatever it may mean, there appears to be only
one likely scenario now, as mind-bending as it may sound: This was
a premeditated set-up to kill Stevens by the Libyan Government and the
United States was either complicit in the plan/murder itself or a
cover-up after the fact. The Libyan government has too many of the usual
unknowns accounted for less than a day after the murders for an outfit
claiming to be unaware of who committed the actual crimes. Obama and
Clinton were much too quick to jump onto a false explanation clearly
already developed by the Libyan government in advance of the killings
for which they wanted someone else to be the official face. And
Clinton's and Obama's absolute avoidance at speaking about this in a way
in which they cannot exclusively control the narrative - such as House
hearings - simply reeks of suspicion which now everyone except the most
fringe-element Obama water-carriers openly recognize. EDIT: as of Jan 23, 2013, Hillary Clinton has offered her explanation: she simply never got the memos - plural
- from Stevens anxiously requesting military assistance - an excuse so
absurd that it insults the intelligence, but she clearly doesn't care as
long as what she says keeps the law from grabbing her.
It
appears certain that Obama and Clinton were very intimately involved in
either the killing or cover-up on some level, as
evidenced incontrovertibly by the fact that they parroted the
monumentally untrue recounting of the events by Libya and initially sold
it hard on a very large scale; sending Rice out to five (5!) different TV
shows on the same day to repeat the lie essentially proves it. They
clearly attempted to overwhelm any truth to the contrary
by saturating the media with this one story fast to make the truth
otherwise invisible.
Bear
in mind, also, that all the surviving witnesses remain hidden by the
Obama Administration - the most alarming fact after the murder - since
it reeks of a Soviet style silencing of the witnessing. Even Congress
does not know who they are, where they are or why, though Congress has
started to make it clear they're getting impatient on this matter,
particularly, though even that seems Johnny-come-lately. Congress is
usually apprised of the info of such info, according to House Rep Jason
Chaffetz (R- Colorado), within 48 hours. It's going on 4 months. Edit: More than 4 months. Unfortunately, this, too, plays into the idea that Libya and/or Obama wanted Stevens dead, as in the presumed original plan all
would die. Then ex-seals Woods and Doherty screwed up the plan
by disobeying stand-down orders and rescued 20 - 30 unwanted witnesses
with whom the administration has no plan to deal with - witnesses Obama
clearly does not want to speak, since witnesses from Algeria, for
example, were made available immediately. So, while the House dithers,
what happens to these survivors? Will they turn up with "tragic brain
damage sustained in the attacks" or will the world be told that the
original records were wrong, there was only one survivor, in Walter
Reed, and that all doctors agree that his brain damage was caused by the
attack? ("How dare you think otherwise? this Administration finds such
speculations offensive")
The GOP House needs to issue subpoenas for Clinton (to return),
a Grand Jury for Obama, immediately subpoena the records that will
identify the remaining witnesses and subpoena them to testify and
should not stand on ceremony. The GOP House needs to find its inner rage
and they need to issue subpoenas for all of the above and they need to
issue them now.
AT READER REQUEST, PRIOR BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMOS NOW HAVE THEIR OWN REPOSITORY SITE, THE "DAILY MEMO FILE CABINET" .CONTINUING CONVERSATIONS WITH GOP REP DANA ROHRABACHER UPDATES CAN BE READ IMMEDIATELY BELOW THIS NOTICE.
****************************
SCROLL DOWN FOR THE NAMES AND CONTACT INFO FOR ALL THE REAL GOP HOUSE HAWKS REGARDING BENGHAZI
****************************
SPECIAL MEMO: OPEN LETTER TO HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE DANA ROHRABACHER; CONTINUING THE TWITTER CONVERSATION WITH REP ROHRABACHER HERE
12/30/2012 - 1/4/2013
Edit:
The Representative has since responded back to me on twitter again
citing that such matters take a long time to handle
the legalities properly. My response: At least talk on TV like you mean business to keep America tuned-in to issue. EDIT
1/4/2013: the Rep & I are having an interesting back-and-forth on
Twitter now. He says in effect, "be patient and learn your history" and I
say "Watergate took 1 year from start to finish and
House Benghazi 'investigation' has used up 1/3 of that much time in
tech-savvy 2013 and so far we have not seen so much as a single subpoena
& house is manifestly falling down horribly on the job for which
they were elected." Which point of view do you agree with? Comment at
bottom of page if you want.
Rep
Rohrabacher, you have been one of the more outspoken voices
regarding Benghazi, and as a media man, I personally like your onscreen
television persona, which is all-at-once straightforward and
approachable. No one I know wants to find himself or herself at odds
with you in a confrontational discussion online. However, you posted
something in response to someone I know pretty well online, Janson
Smithers, which, considering you are one of the most outspoken voices regarding Benghazi, I found unsettling-to-alarming:
"Watergate not quick event. perjury only crime. Benghazi maybe same but this coverup includes killing & perhaps blackmail."
I
certainly agree with the second part, but the first sentence is in
response to Janson demanding quicker action. The fact is that things are
not so austere in the Halls of Power that they work fundamentally differently from the rest of the world in regard to things that can be done now.
Here is a short list of same regarding Benghazi. If I am in error on
any point, I look forward to being corrected in a way that makes sense.
1. Subpoenas can be issued now. They can be issued to Hillary Clinton; Joe Biden
- who as expert on international affairs in the 2008 election for Obama
- can be subpoenaed on his probable consultation during Benghazi; White House aides who were on duty at the time;for White House security videos
of the halls leading to the situation room so we know if Obama, Clinton
and whoever else was there and when. If this sounds like fantasy to
anyone reading, Nixon and Clinton, both, found that they had to abide
by subpoenas - you can read about it here (and elsewhere). Read the last paragraph particularly. We are not talking about the President, here, only those under him. This can be done now, so what are you waiting for?
Do
subpoenas somehow seem extreme to the GOP House? Remember the fuss the
Democrat-led Senate made over Bush simply eaves dropping? Click Here.
We have a dead Ambassador, others with him and twenty witnesses whose
names have not even been released to your House of Representatives by
the White House after four months.
2. You can find out the identity of the rumored survivor from Benghazi currently supposedly at Walter reed Hospital
according to Greta Van Susteren, on whose show you have appeared
repeatedly. What have you done to find out who he is? He has information
about Benghazi and America would like to know. Since no one in the
House has said a thing about this, I must assume the House has no idea
what to do. Therefore, here is Walter Reed Hospital's published
telephone number and address if your fellow GOP reps need help in
establishing a starting point. Call the hospital as a US rep and ask if
there is a survivor there from Benghazi. Then take the next step,
whatever it may be. Tell your GOP fellows to do their legwork or you can show them how it's done!
Walter Reed
National
Military
Medical
Center
8901
Wisconsin
Avenue
| Bethesda,
MD 20889-5600
1-800-526-7101
| (301)
295-4611
CLICK HERE for their website. Yes, I am being a little bit sarcastic for effect here, but only barely, as four months is too damn long to hear nothing but, ultimately at this stage,"Hillary will testify".
3. GRAND JURY FOR OBAMA.
Obama's now very widely recognized lie about the cause of the Benghazi
murders (we have discovered where he got the story he used to cover the
truth, as you can see in the "Breaking News", below) is, it seems to us,
in itself probable cause enough of obstruction of justice to warrant
getting the gears rolling for an eventual Grand Jury appearance and
testimony by Obama. If you recall, on August 17, 1998, a Grand Jury was
called in which Bill Clinton testified about obstruction of justice in
the comparatively insignificant civil case, Jones V Clinton. You can
read it at the left-leaning Washington Post HERE or watch it, edited, below.
Rep
Rohrabacher,that is plenty regarding intentions and potential scenarios
that can at least be openly discussed in the media as an indication of
the GOP House Rep's seriousness about pursuing the Benghazi murders to
justice within the boarders of this nation.
This
blog, started a mere three weeks ago with no more advertising than a
few people initially tweeting the address to their followers, has now
grown to a rough average of 1,000 views a day. We expect that to
increase dramatically rapidly as that now appears to be the trajectory. I
say this so you and your esteemed colleagues in the House will
understand that with each day that goes by, people grow more impatient
because none of the above appears to have been mentioned to the media by
the House, and we, the people, need to know that you are as serious
about the murders of an Ambassador and three others in Benghazi - as
well as the twenty missing American witnesses still unaccounted for- as
the Democrats were about a second-rate break-in and as much as your
GOP predecessors were about a president perjuring himself in a
deposition about a civil suit stemming from no more than
an extramarital affair.
People
are dead, the American people were lied to and the press is covering
for Obama with a veil of silence on this issue. Please inform your
esteemed fellow House Representatives that we expect them to begin to at
least look as though they are serious about doing their jobs.
You
may wish to also read the memo, below, dated Dec 29, 2012. If Boehner
is the stumbling block, use the upcoming vote to get that stumbling
block out of your way. We pay Congress to work, not enjoy the Country
Club.
We
all look forward to strong and determined statements from the House
supplanting the complaining and grandstanding which has thus far been
the pattern. Thus far the House seems to have one mantra: "Hillary will
testify". The obvious truth is that relying on a single - in my opinion -
cold-bloodedly politically ambitious rattlesnake - who has certainly
been less than gracious in the past to the House - to tell the
world exclusively the truth of what happened on the night our people
were murdered by terrorists in Benghazi is infuriatingly naive
and below-par for what needs to be done in the bigger picture. People
died in Benghazi; Watergate and the Clinton affair were given hundreds
of times more diligent attention than the House is outwardly giving to
Benghazi.
I
remain, myself, still supportive of your efforts. But as you can see
online - as you do something your GOP fellows might try - keep your
finger on the pulse, four months is too long to stumble around focusing
on a single, big-name witness, and people are getting angry
and impatient and for very good reason. Annoyance is turning into fury,
and fury will be remembered at the polls in 2014.
As do many, I look forward to your strong and determined leadership on the issue of the Benghazi terrorist murders.
EDIT:
Rep Rohrabacher responded on Twitter saying in effect that this is a
slow process to ensure all is done properly, legally. What he does not
address is why they are being so silent about it in the media. The
smartest thing he could do is telegraph their intentions to subpoena to
the world, rattle Obama into making a political mistake and/or someone
else into coming forward to get ahead of the oncoming tsunami to cover
themselves and raise public awareness so people get angry and demand
answers loudly. The quiet the House is exhibiting may be good in
the country club-style cocktail dinner parties in Georgetown (been
there) which are marked by low volume, placid conversations, but if
these guys don't want to mishandle this into a complete failure which
results in Obama turning into the next Hitler because he feels he is
invincible to everything, they better get some surface energy going.
Media is my business, GOP House members, and you are doing a terrible
job so far and your sense of superior esteem will not change that.
***************************************
****************************************************
*****************************
Benghazi-Truth original editorial graphic about
Clinton. Please spread it everywhere
and don't worry about giving credit,
just so Obama and his pals & all people
everywhere know the American people
aren't buying it for a second.
WHAT YOU CAN DO:
CONTACT GOP LAWMAKERS AND DEMAND BENGHAZI COVER-UP HEARINGS AND INVESTIGATIONS
MANY IN THE GOP-CONTROLLED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ARE HAWKS ON
BENGHAZI AND MEAN REAL BUSINESS!
Here are a few of the more outspoken GOP House Reps. CONTACT THEM! THE HAWKS ARE THE KEY TO THE GOP SELECT COMMITTEE, and the select committee is the key to the open hearings and investigations and the hearings.
DON'T WAIT FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO CALL AND E-MAIL AND TWEET THEM FOR YOU! THEY WON'T REACH OUT AND BITE YOU! YOU CAN CALL REP/HAWKS WHO ARE NOT IN YOUR DISTRICT! THIS IS A NATIONAL LEADERSHIP CRISIS! YOU HAVE A RIGHT MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD TO ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS!
All videos and media material used via Fair Use Act
GOP HOUSE
GOP REP JASON CHAFFETZ
This video was upload by Jason Chaffetz himself
on his own YouTube channel on Dec 6, so you
know he means business! Call and support him!
GOP REP JASON CHAFFETZ
Washington office
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-7751
Fax: (202) 225-5629
Provo Office
51 S University Ave., Suite 318 Provo, UT 84601
Phone: (801) 851-2500
Fax: (801) 851-2509
Twitter: @jasoninthehouse
GOP REP JOE HECK
Rep Heck took the time to make a special video
FOR YOU on YouTube pledging determination
to get to the bottom of the Benghazi cover-up!
Return the favor and call and tell him you
appreciate his efforts!
GOP REP JOE HECK
132 Cannon HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-3252
Fax: (202) 225-2185
8485 W. Sunset Road, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Phone: (702) 387-4941
Fax: (702) 837-0728
Twitter: @RepJoeHeck
GOP REP JAMES LANKFORD
A no-nonsense leader who says it in a no-nonsense
way, direct to YOU right after a meeting Benghazi.
Call and tell him you love his video and to keep
pressing on Benghazi
JAMES LANKFORD, GOP HOUSE, another Hawk
who is NOT PLEASED with Benghazi.
Washington
509 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-2132
Fax: (202) 26-1463
Oklahoma
Oklahoma City1015 N. Broadway Avenue,
Suite 310 Oklahoma City, OK 73102
Phone: (405) 234-9900
Fax: (405) 234-9909
Twitter:@RepLankford
GOP REP PETER KING
Rep King does not mince words.
REP PETER KING has been VERY strong on
calling for a select committee and other
investigations on Benghazi. CONTACT HIM!
E-mail included! Tell him you support his
efforts on Benghazi 100%!
Email:Pete.King@mail.house.gov
Washington Office
339 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: 202-225-7896
Fax: 202-226-2279
Massapequa Park
1003 Park Boulevard Massapequa Park, NY 11762
Phone: 516-541-4225
Fax: 516-541-6602
Twitter: @RepPeteKing
GOP REP FRANK WOLF
Makes the point clear as day: ESTABLISH
SELECT COMMITTEE.
GOP REP FRANK WOLF SENT A LETTER TO SPEAKER
BOEHNER DEMANDING A HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE.
The demand is under consideration. Contact Rep Wolf
and TELL HIM YOU SUPPORT HIS ACTIONS!
Washington Office
241 Cannon Building Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5136
(202) 225-0437 fax
Herndon Office
13873 Park Center Rd Ste.130 Herndon, VA 20171
(703) 709-5800 or (800) 945-9653 in state
Twitter @RepWOLFPress
GOP HOUSE investigation chairman DARRELL ISSA
Issa: "100% of our answers are coming from
whistle-blowers who can't take the lies coming out
of the State Department and out of the White House."
Call his office and tell them you want answers!
THE INVESTIGATION BOSS! GOP HOUSE
investigation chairman DARRELL ISSA!
Washington DC
2347 Rayburn House Office Building • Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-3906
Fax: 202-225-3303
California District Office
1800 Thibodo Road, #310 • Vista, CA 92081
Phone: 760-599-5000
Fax: 760-599-1178
Twitter: @DarrellIssa
* GOP REP TREY GOWDY
* MUST WATCH
Another Hawk who is NOT PLEASED with Benghazi, said that
if Obama didn't want Susan Rice to testify, he would gladly
subpoena him in her place! (hat tip to Saska Mare) Call his
offices and tell them you admire his dedication to Benghazi
and that you expect congressional hearings!
Washington, DC
1237 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-6030
Fax: (202) 226-1177
Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00 AM-5:00 PM Eastern time
South Carolina 4th District
gowdy.house.govGreenville
104 South Main St.
Greenville, SC 29601
Phone: (864) 241-0175
Fax: (864) 241-0982
Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00 AM-5:00 PM
Contact via internet:
https://gowdy.house.gov/forms/writeyourrep/default.aspx
Twitter: @TGowdySC
GOP REP LOUIS GOHMERT
Special Operation Speaks (SOS) leadership presented
Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) with a petition containing the
names of more than 100,000 Americans which he will
deliver to the U.S. House of Representatives.The petition
demands that a special prosecutor be appointed to fully
investigate the events in Washington and abroad surrounding
the murder of the US ambassador to Libya, the ambassador's
aide, and the two Navy Seals attempting to defend US
property in Libya.
Call him and express your admiration for him and
that you expect him to get to the bottom of the Benghazi
cover-up!
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2440 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515
T (202) 225-3035
F (202) 226-1230
TX Toll Free (866) 535-6302
Twitter: @replouiegohmert
GOP SENATE
GOP SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM
Polite, but Not Happy.
GOP SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM
Call him and tell him you admire his courage and
expect him to see Senate Committees are formed!
Washington Office
290 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-5972
Upstate Regional Office
130 South Main Street, 7th Floor
Greenville, SC 29601
Main: (864) 250-1417
SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN
McCain tells it like it is.
SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN
Call the office of this great war hero and tell him you
expect him to be a war hero in the senate and speak
out on the Benghazi nightmare and cover-up every day!
Washington Office:
241 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510
Main: (202) 224-2235
Fax: (202) 228-2862
Phoenix Office:
2201 East Camelback Road Suite 115 Phoenix, AZ 85016
Main: (602) 952-2410
Fax: (602) 952-8702
Twitter @SenJohnMcCain
SENATOR KELLY AYOTTE
Not happy, has sent letters which are still
unanswered by the White House.
SENATOR KELLY AYOTTE
Let this lovely, no-nonsense lady know you
support her as she speaks the truth about
the Benghazi cover-up!
D.C. Office
144 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-3324
Fax: 202-224-4952
Manchester Office
1200 Elm Street, Suite 2
Manchester, NH 03101-2503
Phone: 603-622-7979
Fax: 603-622-0422
Twitter: @KellyAyotte
SENATOR RICHARD BURR (Senate intelligence committee)
Washington, DC
217 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-3154
Fax: (202) 228-2981
Twitter: @SenatorBurr
SENATOR DAN COATS
Washington Office United States Senate
493 Russell Office Bldg Washington, DC, 20510
P: (202) 224-5623
F: (202) 228-1820
Twitter: @DanCoats
SENATOR ROY BLUNT, a true friend of conservatives! He's all over all of it!
Washington
260 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-5721
Fax: (202) 224-8149
Twitter: @RoyBlunt
THIS LIST WILL GROW ALMOST DAILY, BUT YOU CAN STARTED WITH THIS. CONTACT THEM TODAY!
WHAT TO ASK THEM FOR!
1. GOP HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE.
2.
OPEN HEARINGS WITH CLINTON AND EVEN, YES, OBAMA. SUBPOENA IF NECESSARY,
IMPEACH IF REFUSES (House of Representatives, controlled by the
Republicans, has full impeachment authority and does not need the Senate).
3. WHITE HOUSE SURVEILLANCE VIDEO of the halls in the White House, PARTICULARLY OUTSIDE OF THE STRATEGY ROOM, SO WE KNOW WHO WAS WHERE AND WHEN DURING THE 7 HOURS WHEN OUR PEOPLE CALLED FOR HELP and were ultimately murdered by terrorists in BENGHAZI while Obama failed/refused to give them assistance to save their lives.
4. SOME PEOPLE WERE SAVED - EVENTUALLY (IN PART BY A SOLDIER WHO DISOBEYED STAND DOWN ORDERS AND SAVED THEM BEFORE HE, HIMSELF, WAS KILLED IN SO DOING). We need the survivors to testify in open Select Committee hearings.
5. ALL TAPES OF THE CALLS FOR HELP, THE ATTACK, ETC NEED TO BE SEEN AND AIRED IN OPEN SELECT COMMITTEE HEARINGS.
6.
ALL SOLDIERS WHO WERE WITH OUR SOLDIERS who were later killed trying
to save the people in Benghazi must testify in open hearings as to what
they saw and heard that night regarding Obama Administration denials for assistance.
6. ALL HEARINGS NEED TO BE TELEVISED LIVE FROM GAVEL-TO-GAVEL FOR EVERY U.S. CITIZEN TO SEE.
CO-ORDINATE
AND WORK TOGETHER TO CONTACT THE GOP HOUSE, GOP SENATE AND GET THE WORD
OUT TO THE MAINSTREAM. USE THE MESSAGE BOARD BELOW IF YOU LIKE. WE NEED
TO WORK AT THIS EVERY DAY.
LadyRaven's Twitter List
(hat tip to Proud American)
HOUSE Twitter (copy/paste)
This list is intended to allow you to copy, then paste, multiple Representatives into a single tweet. They are NOT linked and do not need to be, twitter does it automatically. Republicans ONLY.
….
The
beauty of twitter is that unlike when contacting a Rep by phone or
e-mail, they do not know what area of the country you hail from and
therefore cannot just write off your concerns because you are not in
their state! With a short message like BOEHNER MUST GO!you can probably tweet four or five at a time.
@RepJoBonner
@RepMarthaRoby @RepMikeRogersAL @Robert_Aderholt @RepMoBrooks
@BachusAL06 @repdonyoung @RepGosar @RepTrentFranks @benquayle @RepDavid
@JeffFlake @RepRickCrawford @RepTimGriffin @rep_stevewomack
@RepDanLungren @RepMcClintock @RepJeffDenham @eltongallegly24
@BuckMcKeon @DevinNunes @GOPWhip @RepEdRoyce @RepJerryLewis
@RepGaryMiller @KenCalvert @MaryBonoMack @DanaRohrabacher
@RepJohnCampbell @DarrellIssa @BilbrayCA50 @RepTipton @repcorygardner
@RepDLamborn @RepDLamborn @Rep_Southerland @AnderCrenshaw @RepRichNugent
@RepCliffStearns @micaforcongress @RepWebster @Bilirakis @RepDennisRoss
@VernBuchanan @RepConnieMack @congbillposey @TomRooney @RosLehtinen
@MarioDB @AllenWest @RepSandyAdams @RepRivera @JackKingston
@RepWestmoreland @RepTomPrice @AustinScottGA08 @RepTomGraves
@RepPaulBrounMD @RepPhilGingrey @Raul_Labrador @CongMikeSimpson
@PeterRoskam @RepJoeWalsh @RepDold @RepKinzinger @JudyBiggert
@RepHultgren @RepTimJohnson @donmanzullo @RepSchilling @repaaronschock
@RepShimkus @RepStutzman @ToddRokita @RepDanBurton @RepMikePence
@RepLarryBucshon @RepToddYoung @TomLatham @CongHuelskamp @RepLynnJenkins
@RepKevinYoder @RepMikePompeo @RepEdWhitfield @RepGuthrie @RepHalRogers
@repjefflandry @RepFleming @USRepAlexander @BillCassidy @RepBoustany
@Harris4Congress @Roscoe_Bartlett @CongressmanDan @RepHuizenga
@repjustinamash @RepDaveCamp @RepFredUpton @RepWalberg @RepMikeRogers
@CandiceMiller @repjohnkline @RepErikPaulsen @MicheleBachmann
@RepChipCravaack @RepAlanNunnelee @GreggHarper @CongPalazzo @RepToddAkin
@VickyHartzler @SmallBizGOP @auctnr1 @JoAnnEmerson @DennyRehberg
@JeffFortenberry @LeeTerry2012 @RepAdrianSmith @AmodeiNevada @RepJoeHeck
@RepFrankGuinta @RepCharlesBass @RepLoBiondo @RepJonRunyan @RepLanceNJ7
@RodneyforNJ @RepStevePearce @RepPeteKing @RepNanHayworth
@RepChrisGibson @RepRichardHanna @RepBuerkle @RepTomReed
@RepReneeEllmers @RepWalterJones @RepVirginiaFoxx @SueMyrick
@PatrickMcHenry @RepRickBerg @RepSteveChabot @RepMikeTurner @Jim_Jordan
@boblatta @RepBillJohnson @SteveAustria @TiberiPress @SteveLaTourette
@RepSteveStivers @RepJimRenacci @RepBobGibbs @USRepSullivan @tomcoleok04
@RepLankford @repgregwalden @MikeKellyforPA3 @CongressmanGT @JimGerlach
@RepMeehan @RepFitzpatrick @RepBillShuster @RepTomMarino
@RepLouBarletta @RepTimScott @CongJoeWilson @RepJeffDuncan @TGowdySC
@RepMickMulvaney @RepKristiNoem @DrPhilRoe @RepChuck @DesJarlaisTN04
@RepDianeBlack @MarshaBlackburn @RepFincherTN08 @replouiegohmert
@JudgeTedPoe @SamsPressShop @RepHensarling @RepJoeBarton
@CongCulberson @RepKevinBrady @McCaulPressShop @ConawayTX11
@RepKayGranger @MacTXPress @RepRonPaul @RepBillFlores @RandyNeugebauer
@TX20CharlieG @LamarSmithTX21 @PeteOlson @RepCanseco @RepKenMarchant
@michaelcburgess @farenthold @RepJohnCarter @PeteSessions
@jasoninthehouse @RobWittman @RepScottRigell @Randy_Forbes
@RepRobertHurt @RepGoodlatte @EricCantor @RepMGriffith @RepWOLFPress
@HerreraBeutler @DocHastings @cathymcmorris @davereichert @RepMcKinley
@RepShelley @RepPaulRyan @JimPressOffice @RepSeanDuffy @RepRibble
@CynthiaLummis
- oh, and of course @SpeakerBoehner
YOU NEED THIS PHONE LIST!
JUSTICE FOR THOSE MURDERED
IN BENGHAZI! IT'S UP TO YOU!
GIVE THEIR FAMILIES CLOSURE! CONTACT YOUR REP TODAY!
Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast 
