Books
such as Stephen King's 'The Stand', TV shows like Discovery Channel's
'The Colony' and
BBC's 'Survivors' along
with films like 'I am Legend', '28 Days Later' and 'Twelve Monkies' to
name just a few... and they
all imagine scenario's
where the population has been reduced by over 90% - that means about 6
billion people must die.
The "Elites" have
been expressing their desire for population reduction of 90% for
many years. And now, with
more and more couples discovering that they are sterile, perhaps in the
next couple of decades they
will get their dream, or
perhaps sooner if they release their deadly bio-weopons. One thing to
remember, the elites believe
they are a different
species to the rest of us. This is why they only breed within certain
bloodlines and for many years now
they have been collecting
DNA of every living person (right from birth with that first "heel
prick" and blood sample)
and then their scientists
can go to work developing their bio-weapons targeted at only those with
specific DNA coding. Couple
that with binary
bio-weapons or time release bio-weapons and you'll understand why many
of the films show huge populations
dying almost instantly.
Given
some of the quotes above; if you're not wondering why Fluoride (a known
poison
which also can have
devastating effects of fertility) and GM Foods have been forced on the
public then you may never break
free of your programming.
And now, they likley have their bio-weapons primed and ready for action
all they need to do is introduce
it to an unsuspecting
public. And what better way than to scare or force everyone into taking
vaccines for some other bogus
pandemic.
Statements
from transcripts during the trials...
So the Nazi's discovered a covert way of sterilizing people.
Now
consider this: The Body
Scanners used at airports delver significantly higher doses of X Rays
than normal "medical"
X Rays.
Below is an excellent
article that details the Population Reduction Agenda of the Elites.
The elite agenda for global population control is not a “conspiracy theory,” it is
on the record and documented.
There
are still large numbers of people amongst the general
public, in academia, and
especially those who work for the corporate media, who are still in
denial about the on-the-record
stated agenda for global
population reduction, as well as the consequences of this program that
we already see unfolding.
We
have compiled a compendium of evidence to prove that the elite have
been obsessed with
eugenics and its modern day
incarnation, population control, for well over 100 years and that goal
of global population reduction
is still in full force to
this day.
The World’s Elite Are Discussing Population
Reduction
As was
reported only last month by the London Times,
a “secret billionaire club” meeting in early May which took place in
New York and was attended by David Rockefeller,
Ted Turner, Bill Gates and
others was focused around “how their wealth could be used to slow the
growth of the world’s
population”.
We questioned establishment media spin which portrayed the attendees
as kind-hearted and concerned philanthropists by pointing out that Ted Turner has
publicly advocated shocking population reduction programs
that would cull the human population by a staggering 95%. He has also
called for a Communist-style one child policy to be
mandated by governments in
the west. In China, the one child policy is enforced by means of taxes
on each subsequent child,
allied to an intimidation program which includes secret police and “family planning” authorities kidnapping pregnant women from their homes and
performing forced abortions.
Of
course, Turner completely fails to follow his own rules
on how everyone else should
live their lives, having five children and owning no less than 2
million acres of land.
The
notion that these elitists merely want to slow population
growth in order to improve
health is a complete misnomer. Slowing the growth of the world’s
population while also improving
its health are two
irreconcilable concepts to the elite. Stabilizing world population is a
natural byproduct of higher living
standards, as has been
proven by the stabilization of the white population in the west.
Elitists like David Rockefeller have
no interest in “slowing the
growth of world population” by natural methods, their agenda is firmly
rooted in the
pseudo-science of eugenics,
which is all about “culling” the surplus population via draconian
methods.
David Rockefeller’s
legacy is not derived from a well-meaning “philanthropic”
urge to improve health in
third world countries, it is born out of a Malthusian drive to eliminate
the poor and those deemed
racially inferior, using
the justification of social Darwinism.
As is documented in Alex Jones’ seminal film Endgame,
Rockefeller’s father, John D. Rockefeller, exported eugenics to Germany
from its origins in Britain by bankrolling
the Kaiser Wilhelm
Institute which later would form a central pillar in the Third Reich’s
ideology of the Nazi super
race. After the fall of the
Nazis, top German eugenicists were protected by the allies as the
victorious parties fought over
who would enjoy their
“expertise” in the post-war world.
As Dr. Len Horowitz writes,
“In the 1950s, the Rockefellers reorganized the U.S. eugenics movement
in their own family offices, with spinoff population-control
and abortion groups. The
Eugenics Society changed its name to the Society for the Study of Social
Biology, its current name.”
“The
Rockefeller Foundation had long financed the eugenics movement in
England, apparently
repaying Britain for the
fact that British capital and an Englishman-partner had started old John
D. Rockefeller out in his
Oil Trust. In the 1960s,
the Eugenics Society of England adopted what they called
Crypto-eugenics, stating in their official
reports that they would do
eugenics through means and instruments not labeled as eugenics.”
“With
support from the Rockefellers, the Eugenics Society (England) set up a
sub-committee called the International
Planned Parenthood
Federation, which for 12 years had no other address than the Eugenics
Society. This, then, is the private,
international apparatus
which has set the world up for a global holocaust, under the UN flag.”
In the latter half of the 20th century, eugenics merely changed its face to become known as
“population control”. This was crystallized in
National Security Study Memorandum 200,
a 1974 geopolitical strategy document prepared by Rockefeller’s
intimate friend and fellow Bilderberg member Henry
Kissinger, which targeted
thirteen countries for massive population reduction by means of creating
food scarcity, sterilization
and war.
Henry
Kissinger: In the now declassified 1974 document, National Security
Memorandum 200, Kissinger outlines the
plan to use food scarcity
as a weapon in order to achieve population reduction in lesser-developed
countries.
The document,
declassified in 1989, identified 13 countries that were of special
interest to
U.S. geopolitical
objectives and outlined why population growth, and particularly that of
young people who were seen as a
revolutionary threat to
U.S. corporations, was a potential roadblock to achieving these
objectives. The countries named were
India, Bangladesh,
Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand,
Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia.
The study outlined how civil disturbances affecting the “smooth flow of needed materials”
would be less likely to occur “under conditions of slow or zero population growth.”
“Development
of a worldwide political
and popular commitment to population stabilization is fundamental to any
effective strategy. This
requires the support and
commitment of key LDC leaders. This will only take place if they clearly
see the negative impact
of unrestricted population
growth and believe it is possible to deal with this question through
governmental action,”
states the document.
The
document called for integrating “family planning”
(otherwise known as
abortion) with routine health services for the purposes of “curbing the
numbers of LDC people,”
(lesser-developed
countries).
The report shockingly
outlines how withholding food could
be used as a means of
punishment for lesser-developed countries who do not act to reduce their
population, essentially using
food as a weapon for a
political agenda by creating mass starvation in under-developed
countries.
“The allocation of scarce PL480 (food) resources should take account of what steps a country is taking
in population control as well as food production,” states the document.
Later
in the document, the idea
of enforcing “mandatory programs” by using food as “an instrument of
national
power” is presented.
The
document states that the program will be administered
through the United Nations
Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), thereby “avoiding the danger
that some LDC leaders
will see developed-country
pressures for family planning as a form of economic or racial
imperialism; this could well create
a serious backlash.”
As
Jean Guilfoyle writes, “NSSM 200 was
a statement composed after
the fact. During the late 1960s and early 1970s, the U.S. had worked
diligently behind the scenes
to advance the
population-control agenda at the United Nations, contributing the
initial funding of $1 million.
A Department
of State telegram, dated
July 1969, reported the support of John D. Rockefeller III, among
others, for the appointment of
Rafael Salas of the
Philippines as senior officer to co-ordinate and administer the UN
population program. The administrator
of the UN Development
Program reported confidentially that he preferred someone such as Salas
who had the “advantage
of color, religion
(Catholic) and conviction.”
Evidence
of the actual consequences of this program can be found with
the link between vaccines
and sterilization, as well as other diseases such as cancer, in both the
west and the third world.
In
the following video clip, after an introduction by Alex Jones, women of
the Akha tribe
who live predominately in
Thailand, describe how they miscarried shortly after taking vaccines
when they were eight months
pregnant. The videos below
highlight the efforts of supporters of the Akha tribe to get answers
from the University of Oregon
and the United Nations, who
provided funding for the vaccination and sterilization programs.
Further
evidence of the link
between vaccinations, birth control, cancer and other diseases can be
researched
here.
In
the 21st century, the eugenics movement has changed its stripes once
again, manifesting
itself through the global
carbon tax agenda and the notion that having too many children or
enjoying a reasonably high standard
of living is destroying the
planet through global warming, creating the pretext for further
regulation and control over every
facet of our lives.
As
we have tirelessly documented, the elite’s drive for population
control is not based around
a benign philanthropic urge to improve living standards, it is firmly
routed in eugenics, racial
hygiene and fascist
thinking.
The London Times reports
that the secret billionaire cabal,
with its interest in
population reduction, has been dubbed ‘The Good Club’ by insiders. This
couldn’t be
further from the truth.
Anyone who takes the time to properly research the origins of the
“population control”
movement will come to
understand that the Rockefeller-Turner-Gates agenda for drastic
population reduction, which is now clearly
manifesting itself through
real environmental crises like chemtrails, genetically modified food,
tainted vaccines and other
skyrocketing diseases such
as cancer, has its origins in the age-old malevolent elitist agenda to
cull the human “chattel”
as one would do to rodents
or any other species deemed a nuisance by the central planning
authorities.
Sterilization And Eugenics Returns In Popular Culture
We
are now seeing the return
of last century’s eugenicist movement through the popular promotion of
sterilization as a
method of birth control.
A popular women’s magazine in the UK recently featured
an article entitled,
Young, Single and Sterilized,
in which women in their 20’s discussed why they had undergone an
operation to prevent them from ever having children.
The article is little more
than PR for a “women’s charity” called Marie Stopes International, an
organization
that carries out abortions
and sterilizations and was founded by a Nazi eugenicist who advocated
compulsory sterilization
of non-whites and “those of
bad character”.
In the article,
sterilization
is lauded as an “excellent
method of birth control” by Dr. Patricia Lohr of the British Pregnancy
Advisory Service.
The
article includes an advertisement that encourages women to seek “more
information
about sterilization” by
contacting Marie Stopes International. We read that, “Over the past
year, a quarter of
the women who booked a
sterilisation consultation with women’s charity Marie Stopes were aged
30 or under.”
Marie
Stopes was a feminist who opened the first birth control clinic in
Britain in 1921
as well as being Nazi
sympathizer and a eugenicist who advocated that non-whites and the poor
be sterilized.
Stopes, a racist and an anti-Semite, campaigned for selective breeding to achieve racial purity, a passion she
shared with Adolf Hitler in adoring letters and poems that she sent the leader of the Third Reich.
Stopes
also attended the Nazi congress on population science in Berlin in
1935, while calling
for the “compulsory
sterilization of the diseased, drunkards, or simply those of bad
character.” Stopes acted
on her appalling theories
by concentrating her abortion clinics in poor areas so as to reduce the
birth rate of the lower
classes.
Stopes left most of her estate to the Eugenics Society, an organization that
shared her passion for racial purity and still exists today under the new name
The Galton Institute. The society has included members such as Charles Galton Darwin (grandson of the evolutionist), Julian Huxley and Margaret
Sanger.
Marie Stopes, the Nazi and pioneering eugenicist who sent love letters to Hitler, honored recently by the Royal
Mail.
Ominously,
The Galton Institute website promotes
its support and funding initiative for “the practical delivery of
family planning facilities, especially in developing
countries.” In other words,
the same organization that once advocated sterilizing black people to
achieve racial purity
in the same vein as the
Nazis is now bankrolling abortions of black babies in the third world.
While
the issue of abortion is an
entirely different argument, most would agree that no matter how
extreme it sounds, a woman has
the right to sterilize
herself if she so chooses, just as a man has the right to a vasectomy.
But
when a magazine aimed
primarily at young women all but encourages girls as young as 20 to have
their fallopian tubes tied
in order to prevent the
“irritation” of children entering their lives and then advertises an
organization founded
by a Nazi eugenicist that
can perform the operation, something has to be amiss.
Even
more shocking than this is
the fact that the majority of people in the UK routinely express their
support for society’s
“undesirables” to be
forcibly sterilized by the state, harking back to a time when such a
thing was commonplace
right up to the 1970’s in
some areas of America and Europe.
As we highlighted at the time,
respondents to a Daily Mail article about Royal Mail honoring Marie
Stopes by using her image on a commemorative stamp were
not disgusted at Royal Mail
for paying homage to a racist Nazi eugenicist, but were merely keen to
express their full agreement
that those deemed not to be
of pure genetic stock or of the approved character should be forcibly
sterilized and prevented
from having children.
“A lot of people should be sterilized, IMO. It’s still
true today,” wrote one.
“Just
imagine what a stable, well-ordered society
we’d have if compulsory
sterilisation had been adopted years ago for the socially undesirable,”
states another
respondent, calling for a
“satellite-carried sterilisation ray” to be installed in space to zap
the undesirables.
Shockingly,
another compares sterilization and genocide of those deemed inferior to
the
breeding and culling of
farmyard animals, and says that such a move is necessary to fight
overpopulation and global warming.
Here is the comment in full
from “Karen” in Wales;
We
breed
farm animals to produce the
best possible stock and kill them when they have fulfilled their
purpose. We inter-breed pedigree
animals to produce extremes
that leave them open to ill-health and early death. It is only religion
that says humans are not
animals. The reality is
that we are simply intelligent, mammalian primates.
The
world
population of humans has
increased from 2 billion to 6.5 billion in the last 50 years. This
planet can support 2 billion humans
comfortably. 6.5 billion
humans use too many resources and leads to global warming, climate
change and a very uncertain future
for all of us – humans and
all other life sharing this planet with us.
Marie
Stopes
believed in population
control and in breeding the best possible humans. So did Hitler. Neither of the aims are bad in
themselves. It is how they are achieved that is the problem. The fact that we still remember Marie Stopes is an achievement
in itself.
The nature of these comments is so fundamentally sick and twisted
that one is tempted to dismiss them as a joke – but these people are deadly serious.
Presumably they would
also agree with China’s one
child policy, which is routinely enforced by intimidation as young
pregnant women are grabbed
off the streets by state
goons and taken to hospitals where forced abortions are carried out.
Now
with popular women’s
magazines advising women in their 20’s where they can go to be
sterilized and ensure a lifetime
of partying and carefree
sex, it’s no surprise that experts predict that by 2010 one in four
western women will be child
free for life.
The
yearning to have children is the most beautiful, natural and innate
emotion either a man or a
woman can possibly experience. That is not to say that it’s always wrong
for some people not
to have children – extreme
circumstances can justify such a decision. But to have yourself
sterilized because you find
children to be an
“irritant” and want to live a life free of responsibility or
consequences is an awful message
to send to young women,
especially in the sex-saturated entertainment culture that we are now
forced to endure.
Furthermore, the outright promotion of Marie Stopes Intern
ational
as ‘the place
to go’ to get sterilized if
you’re under 30 is stomach-churning considering the fact that the
origins of this
organization can be found
in Nazi ideology, racist and backward early 20th century eugenics and a
long-standing agenda to
cull the population of
undesirables, an abhorrent belief still held by elites across the planet today.
Genocidal Population Reduction Programs Embraced
By Academia
One
such individual who embraces the notion that humans are a virus
that should be wiped out en
masse for the good of mother earth is Dr. Eric R. Pianka, an American
biologist based at the University
of Texas in Austin.
Dr Erik Pianka, the American biologist who advocated the mass genocide of 90% of the human race and was applauded
by his peers.
During a speech to the Texas Academy of Science in March 2006,
Pianka advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the world’s population
through the airborne ebola virus. The reaction
from scores of top
scientists and professors in attendance was not one of shock or
revulsion – they stood and applauded
Pianka’s call for mass
genocide.
Pianka’s speech was
ordered to be kept
off the record before it
began as cameras were turned away and hundreds of students, scientists
and professors sat in attendance.
Saying
the public was not ready to hear the information presented, Pianka
began by exclaiming,
“We’re no better than
bacteria!”, as he jumped into a doomsday malthusian rant about
overpopulation destroying
the earth.
Standing
in front of a slide of human skulls, Pianka gleefully advocated
airborne ebola as his
preferred method of exterminating the necessary 90% of humans, choosing
it over AIDS because of its
faster kill period. Ebola
victims suffer the most tortuous deaths imaginable as the virus kills by
liquefying the internal
organs. The body literally
dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice.
Pianka
then cited the
Peak Oil fraud
as another reason to initiate global genocide. “And the fossil fuels
are running out,” he said, “so I think
we may have to cut back to
two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.”
Later,
the scientist welcomed the
potential devastation of the avian flu virus and spoke glowingly of
China’s enforced one
child policy, before
zestfully commenting, “We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth.”
At
the end of Pianka’s speech the audience erupted not to a chorus of boos
and hisses but to a raucous
reception of applause and
cheers as audience members clambered to get close to the scientist to
ask him follow up questions.
Pianka was later presented
with a distinguished scientist award by the Academy. Pianka is no
crackpot. He has given lectures
to prestigious universities
worldwide.
Indeed, the notion
that the earth’s population
needs to be drastically
reduced is a belief shared almost unanimously by academics across the
western hemisphere.
In 2002, The
Melbourne Age
reported on newly uncovered documents detailing Nobel Peace Prize
winning microbiologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet’s plan
to help the Australian
government develop biological weapons for use against Indonesia and
other “overpopulated”
countries of South-East
Asia.
From the article;
Sir
Macfarlane recommended in a secret report in 1947 that biological and
chemical weapons should be developed
to target food crops and
spread infectious diseases. His key advisory role on biological warfare
was uncovered by Canberra
historian Philip Dorling in
the National Archives in 1998.
“Specifically
to the
Australian situation, the
most effective counter-offensive to threatened invasion by overpopulated
Asiatic countries would
be directed towards the
destruction by biological or chemical means of tropical food crops and
the dissemination of infectious
disease capable of
spreading in tropical but not under Australian conditions,” Sir
Macfarlane said.
The
Victorian-born immunologist, who headed the Walter and Eliza Hall
Institute of Medical Research, won the
Nobel prize for medicine in
1960. He died in 1985 but his theories on immunity and “clonal
selection” provided
the basis for modern
biotechnology and genetic engineering.
Controversy
surrounding the comments of
another darling of scientific academia, geneticist James Watson, who
told a Sunday Times newspaper
interviewer that black
people are inherently less intelligent than whites, should come as no
surprise to those who are aware
of Watson’s role in pushing
the dark pseudo-science of eugenics.
Watson
told the
interviewer that he was
“inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social
policies
are based on the fact that
their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says
not really”.
Watson was the Head of the Human Genome
Project until 1992 and is
best known for his
contribution to the discovery of DNA, an achievement that won him the
Nobel Peace prize in 1962.
But
what most people are unaware of is the fact that Watson has played an
integral role
in advancing the legitimacy
of the eugenics/population reduction movement for decades.
Watson
is a strong proponent of
genetic screening, a test to determine whether a couple is at increased
risk of having a baby with
a hereditary genetic
disorder.
Since such screening
obviously increases the rate of
abortions of babies
considered “imperfect,” many have slammed its introduction as nothing
more than a camouflage
for eugenics or “voluntary
eugenics” as British philosophy professor Philip Kitcher labeled it.
Watson’s advocacy of genetic engineering stretched to his call for the “really stupid” bottom
10% of people to be “cured”.
Watson
even urged woman to be given carte blanche
to abort babies should
tests determine that they are likely to be homosexual, despite the vast
body of evidence indicating
homosexuality is a result
of environment rather than genetic code.
The
geneticist has
gone so far as to promote
the idea of creating a kind of Nazi super-race, where the attractive and
physically strong are genetically
manufactured under
laboratory conditions.
“People say it would be terrible if
we made all girls pretty. I think it would be great,” said Watson.
Dr.
Erik Pianka’s
doomsday warning of the
population bomb, for which he presented no evidence whatsoever, is
complete pseudo-science. Populations
in developed countries are
declining and only in third world countries are they expanding
dramatically. Industrialization
itself levels out
population trends and aside from this, world population models routinely
show that the earth’s population
will level out at 9 billion
in 2050 and slowly decline after that. “The population of the most
developed countries will
remain virtually unchanged
at 1.2 billion until 2050,” states a
United Nations report. Conservation International’s
own study revealed that 46% of the earth’s surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea.
Think
about the magnitude of Pianka’s statements. He wants to kill nine out
of every ten members of your
family and he wants to kill
them in one of the most painful and agonizing ways imaginable.
If
Pianka, or ‘The Lizard Man’
as he likes to be called, is so vehement in embracing the necessity of
culling the
human population will he
step forward to be the first one in line? Will he sacrifice his children
for the so-called greater
good of the planet? We
somehow doubt it.
Will the
students and other top academics who
so enthusiastically greeted
his ideas go home and kill themselves for the cause if it is so
righteous?
It was noted how Pianka
presented his argument with the kind of glee that you would see in a
demented serial
killer before dispatching
his victim. This is an attitude we have encountered again and again. To
discuss killing 90% of the
world’s population via a
horrific plague is sick enough within itself but you would at least
expect its advocates to
be serious and sober in
their approach to the subject. The opposite seems to be the case, where
the subject is aired in a
context of lighthearted
lip-smacking and hand-rubbing as if the individual was about to sink his
teeth into a T-bone steak.
This
window gives us a clear view of exactly why these deranged bastards
encompass this
ideology. They love death
and their lives are motivated by dark influences very different to you
or I.
Throughout history, elites have invented justifications for barbaric practices as a cover for their true agenda
of absolute power and control over populations.
More Examples Of Population
Reduction & Eugenics
From 1932 until 1972, the
Tuskegee Study Group (pictured below) deliberately infected poor black communities in Alabama with syphilis without their consent and withheld
treatment as the diseased rampaged through the town killing families.
In 1951 the Israeli
government used US government provided technology to
irradiate 100,000 Jewish children
in a mass atomic experiment with an entire generation of Sephardi
youths used as guinea pigs. 6,000 died immediately after
the experiments and the
rest suffered for the rest of their lives with debilitating illnesses
and cancer.
As we have documented,
members of the elite are quite open in their feverish lust to commit
mass murder and ethnic
cleansing. In the foreword
to his biography If I Were An Animal, Prince Philip, another closet
Nazi, wrote, “In the
event that I am
reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to
contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
This is just one of many on the record statements where
Prince Philip has advocated his desire to “cull” the surplus human
population. In another speech, he even
lambasted the fact that
lives were saved in Sri Lanka through Malaria treatments because it
meant there were three times as
many mouths to feed.
One
of the most chilling admissions of the elitists’ deadly
intent to forcibly commit
genocide to reduce global population came from the lips of the late
Jacques Cousteau, the sainted
environmental icon. In an
interview with the UNESCO Courier for November 1991 the famed
oceanographer said:
“The damage
people cause to the planet is a function of demographics — it is equal
to the degree
of development. One
American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangaladeshes. The
damage is directly linked to consumption.
Our society is turning
toward more and needless consumption. It is a vicious circle that I
compare to cancer….”
“This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must
eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.”
It
is important to stress that this essay merely scratches the surface of
both the stated
goals of global population
reduction from elitists and insiders, along with concrete examples of
these programs being carried
out. We could not possibly
list them all in one article because this would take a book the length
of an encyclopedia.
Further information is covered in Alex Jones’s Endgame, See video in right column.
