Chasing the Muslim Brotherhood movement moving to London .. / Abdel Bari Atwan
- Details
- April 3, 2014
- Published on Friday, April 3 / April 2014 21:03
It
was not strange or surprising, to be the Egyptian authorities of the
first welcoming and BETA decision of David Cameron, the British prime
minister to conduct an urgent investigation on the Muslim Brotherhood,
and a comprehensive review of their thoughts and practices, including
accusations Boukovhm behind an attack on a tourist bus in Egypt, killing
three tourists In the month of February last year. Britain is under great pressure
By
the three major Arab states waging a bloody war against the Muslim
Brotherhood and classified as a movement "terrorist" are Egypt, Saudi
Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, and practiced these countries put
pressure on the British government to ban the movement, and not to allow
the transformation of Britain into "safe haven" for leadership . The
independence of the British courts, and asylum laws "flexible" and
generous aid Social Security Corporation, are all factors that have made
Britain, and London in particular, is a magnet for political Islam
and its activists, in the stage of the nineties, after the end of the
war in Afghanistan for the Afghan mujahideen and their fellow Arabs, the
flow of thousands of these to Britain and settled there, including the
people turned to the leaders of the "Al Qaeda" later, such as Mr. Khalid
Al-Fawaz ambassador organization former, which opened an office in
public in Oxford Street, or Mr. Abu Musab al-Suri (Mustafa Setmariam)
and Omar Abu Omar (Abu Qatada) . Nothing
to fear the three countries mentioned above is what can be done by the
leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood who had taken refuge or may resort to
Britain, and settle in, is what we can do out of the media centers shall
mobilize political opposition and inciting against the regimes in their
home countries, because the British laws do not impose restrictions on
freedom of expression, and allow easy to open channels of television and
daily newspapers or issuing periodic unlike the laws of other European
countries. ***
It is ironic that Saudi Arabia was the first to take advantage of this
open media climate, when, issued its newspaper "Middle East" of the
British capital, followed by the launch station "MBC" television in
order to address the "public opinion" in her first, Then the rest of the
Arab countries and influence policies in line with Saudi Arabia, and
also the irony that these media influence was very friendly with the
Muslim Brotherhood movement and their thoughts and support the jihad in
Afghanistan, and it turns out this trend clearly through the issuance of
the newspaper "Muslims." Things
have changed, movement "Brotherhood" has moved from the list of allies
to the list of enemies in recent years, and has become a source of
threat Systems because it moved, according to its opponents, the
movement of advocacy, to organize political transboundary works with all
possible energy to the heart of the systems and access to power. Britain
also changed since the attacks of July 2005 by four "suicide bombers"
shared the ideology of "al-Qaeda" in the underground trains to London,
and led to the deaths of nearly sixty people, in addition to wounding
hundreds, paralyzing economic life and instilling panic in the ranks of
the British. Tolerance,
the British began to shrink gradually toward Islamist militant groups
in general, and authorities began to impose restrictions militant to
enter the preachers and clerics leading Islamist from the likes of
Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who was refused entry, and Sheikh Raed Salah,
leader of the Islamic movement in the floors occupied since 1948, and
suffered many of the mosques and businesses owned by Muslims to the
attacks and violence, and it came to an end the issuance of Britain for
the first time in its history, laws that allow the withdrawal of
nationality from any Muslim engages in acts of "terror", including the
fight against the regime in Syria or in the ranks of militant groups
such as young Muslim in Somalia, has been actually pull 36 nationalities
so far most of the owners of the Arabs. The
biggest obstacle that stands in front to meet the pressures of the
three Arab countries to Britain in order to close down in the face of
the Muslim Brotherhood who are looking to set up their tents in the
capital, is that a large proportion of the Muslim Brotherhood in Britain
citizens have British citizenship, in addition to this that there is a
whole chapter between the government and the judiciary British who
enjoys full independence. In
the early nineties defected to Britain opponents Saudis are Dr. Saad
al-Faqih and his partner in the reform, Dr. Muhammad al-Massari, and
starting with the politically active opponent of the regime in their
country's bothered by the ruling family, prompting her to threaten to
cancel the arms deal Yamamah signed by the Kingdom with Britain, worth
more than 70 billion dollars. British
Prime Minister John Major at the time made great efforts to persuade
Saudi Arabia's King Fahd bin Abdul Aziz, he could not deportation
without a court ruling, because they advanced for the right to asylum,
and the law prohibits expulsion or hand them over to their government. And
actually moved to King Fahd Comrade Supreme, and retired Major
political work, as well as his successor, Tony Blair, and Cameron is
retiring after a year, either Drs Faqih and Masari what is still in
Britain and enjoy its protection, and holds citizenship and their
children studying in universities. The
British government set up a commission of inquiry into the activities
of the Muslim Brotherhood, a home run to send a message double, the
first of its allies and largest trading partners, namely Saudi Arabia
and the United Arab Emirates and Egypt in which she says she takes their
demands to shut the doors in the face of employees of the Brotherhood
movement and their leaders in earnest, and the second to the
Brotherhood-affiliated present in the Arab countries, and are looking to
resort to them that they are not welcome at home. ***
Verdict by a court in the province of Minya Egyptian to death 528
people, ten days ago, a large percentage of them supporters of the
Muslim Brotherhood movement, is the largest service provided by the
Egyptian judiciary and the government, which intervened and directed its
provisions, the Brotherhood movement and their supporters in terms of
supporting an application for asylum progresses do any of them in
Britain, and probably in other European countries, it is sufficient to
give the asylum seeker this judgment to the court to prove that his life
is in danger, and that the judiciary in the country is unfair and is
not independent. Arab
governments have issued edicts in minutes criminalizing the movement,
"Brotherhood" and put it on the terrorism list, but in the West, a
different picture, and must prove this charge with the documentation,
which is a very difficult task, in our view, may take years of
deliberations, legal, and that the committee, which formed to study the
assessment of the Muslim Brotherhood movement and its activities and
practices may need years to also submit its report to the government
about the results of their research and studies. Our
problem in the Arab countries, and even third world countries the
absence of fair judiciary independent, which is an essential part of the
system of democracy, but we believe that all the systems in the
developed countries can do what they want, and issued verdicts that you
want, unsanctioned just like her, any world Third. The
pressures and temptations of all forms, you can buy everything, but if
the judiciary was independent, and judges who apply the law of equality
and justice for the son of "Mr." and the son of "ongoing" and without
any discrimination.
