Dear Mr Netanyahu
Office of the Prime Minister
Hello remember me from face book we talked one night and i told you how all my friends we all love the nation and people of israel
and how we stayed up all night fighting with you when obama tryed to make you take israel back to the broaders of 1967
you gave me your email and number and told me to call you
i am charlene zechender
PLEASE DONT TRUST OBAMAS GOVERNMENT
I ASK YOU IN THE NAME OF JESUS DONT TRUST ANY OF THEM
OBAMA HAS BEEN GIVE IN TERRORIST OUR TAX PAYER MONEY TO KILL CHRISTIANS AND JEWS
PLEASE DONT TRUST ANY OF THEM
I DONT
YOU CAN THINK I AM CRAZY
BUT YOU HAVE YOUR PATH WITH GOD ASK HIM
GOD WILL NEVER LIE TO YOU
BUT PEOPLE WILL
DONT TRUST ANY OF THEM
THEY ALL ARE IN ON IT
THEY SOLD OUT OUR NATION TO CHINA RUSSIA AND ISLAM
OBAMA IS A MUSLIM
HE ONLY WANTS ISLAMS WAY
TO ME I THINK HE IS ONE OF THE ANTICHRIST
JESUS TOLD US THIS DAY WOULD COME
DONT TRUST KERRY HE SOLD OUT TO
THEY IS SOME THING WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE
IF THEY THINK BUT HAND IN AWAY OUR FREEDOMS AND OUR RIGHTS TO TERRORIST WILL SAVE THEM
THEY ARE WRONG
ISLAM WILL KILL THEM TOO
PLEASE I STAND ON THE WORD OF GOD
I LOVE YOU AND THE NATION OF ISRAEL PLEASE PROTECT YOUR SELF
OBAMA WILL NOT HELP YOU
HE HANDED THE US AND YOUR NATION TO ISLAM
HE GIVES THEM WEAPONS
I PRAY THAT I WILL ONE DAY COME TO ISRAEL BUT WHAT I DO EXPOSEING OBAMA OUT I DONT THINK THEY WILL LET ME LEAVE GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR NATION FOR BE IN OUR FRIENDS FOR MANY YEARS
PLEASE KNOW THIS
GOD WILL PROTECT THE NATION OF ISRAEL I LOVE YOU ALL PLEASE PRAY FOR WE THE CHRISTIANS OF THE USA
GOD BLESS YOU
I WISH THEY WOULD DEPORT ME THEY IS NO WERE SAVE ON AERTH BUT ISRAEL DONT GIVE IT UP WITH OUT A FIGHT GOD HAS YOUR BACK AND THEY WILL ALL FALL WHEN GOD COMES DOWN TO PROTECT YOU
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Pray for my Safety Here in NC
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRAYERS
Finally,
I have returned to North Carolina to help with my brother's health
issues. Thanks to God and your prayers and support, the trip was
successful and safe, in spite of my sustaining a shoulder/neck injury
while visiting the Christian horse ranch in Minnesota, CHANGING GAITS.
Please continue to pray for my safety, wisdom and protection from the darkness in this region. My mother and I had to originally move from the Carolinas due to several attacks on my life from the regional satanists here.
Fall in Western North Carolina
But I refuse to hide in fear, cowering under some rock. It is not I that needs to be afraid, but IT IS THOSE WALKING IN SPIRITUAL DARKNESS here. They are all only ONE HEARTBEAT AWAY FROM HELL. If I die, I go to heaven. And if they die, they perish in eternal torment forever.
I am also writing this brief article to state frankly that between travel needs and having to obtain pain remedies at health food stores on the way to enable me to keep on driving, my funds are almost totally depleted. I have less than $75 left in my account, and that will go tomorrow to pay for my monthly phone bill.
Mountains of NC
Although I planned to immediately attempt to find work in this area after arriving so I could support myself while here, that plan cannot be carried out until my shoulder and neck are completely restored, since my work requires lifting and cleaning. I am experiencing much pain even as I try to type this. All my old Christian friends and acquaintances were so glad to see me return to this area, and wanted to hug me...but I had to tell them to be careful with my injured left shoulder and neck when they did so!
Emergency financial support is therefore critically needed until I can get my feet firmly on the ground after relocating here.
Also, between times of visitation with my brother and consultation to improve his conditions with his therapist and social worker, I am fully planning to visit regions of reports of foreign troops near here (Gatlinburg TN) and elsewhere, armed with THE BIBLE in their languages. There is much Christian outreach that must be done in this ASHEVILLE NC region, as my previous articles have explained. All this requires funds for gas and traveling.
I refuse to let anything keep me from ministry at this time...pain or not. Why? Because our time may be very short in America. Every opportunity to reach the lost with the salvation of Jesus Christ must be used while we still can.
Thank you for your kind consideration at this difficult time. God bless you all.
Obamacare can be defunded without Senate approval
Obamacare can be defunded without Senate approval
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
October 2, 2013
When the House passed legislation to defund ObamaCare but would keep the government
running through mid-December, the Senate, led by Senate Majority
Leader, Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) stated that they would not budge on
Obamacare and the legislation was defeated.
On Monday, Dr. Harold Pease, an expert on the United States Constitution, stated that the authority in dealing with Obamacare funding belongs to the U.S. House, not the U.S. Senate and that the House is doing this all wrong.
Pease said, “Everything hinged upon funding which was given exclusively to the House of Representatives, the only power that they alone had.”
Pease went on to say, “All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. To fund anything, in this case Obamacare, first approval is required by the House of Representatives.”
“If that does not happen taxpayer money cannot be spent. The people, through their representatives to Congress, have determined, after a three-year closer scrutiny of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), that it does not protect the patient, is not affordable and is not even workable; hence in the interests of the vast majority of the people needs to be defunded.”
When the United States Supreme Court ruled on Obamacare in 2012, Chief Justice Roberts stance on Obamacare coincides with the intent of the U.S. Constitution, explained by Pease, and the powers between the House and Senate.
According to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Obamacare cannot be implemented and is not considered the law of the land, contrary to Democrat claims.
Bubba Atkinson of the Independent Journal Review wrote, “Chief Justice Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That is how the Democrats got Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything, ever. The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.”
“Next, he stated that, because Congress doesn’t have the ability to mandate, it must, to fund Obama-care, rely on its power to tax. Therefore, the mechanism that funds Obama-care is a tax,” said Atkinson. “He struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the states — “comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing funding.” Roberts ruled that is a no-no.”
When the House attached Obamacare to the legislation in funding the government, it made a mistake in doing so and the funding of Obamacare should have been separate, thereby giving the Senate no power in denying the Houses’ request to defund Obamacare.
Pease said, “House opposition to funding Obamacare would have been far more powerful if made a “stand alone” bill not attached to general funding, but it is not. “Stand alone,” having no other parts, would have left the Senate no wiggle or compromise room once it went to them, nor would there be for the Joint Conference Committee thereafter that reconciles any differences between the two houses. There would be nothing to reconcile, Obamacare is merely defunded.”
“Still, the intent of the Founding Fathers was to give the people, through their House of Representatives, the power collectively to say no to any proposed federal tax, which she is decidedly doing.”
If Obamacare is removed from the government budget, presented, and voted on as a separate bill, Obamacare can be defunded by the House and the Senate and the President has no constitutional authority to override the House decision.
On Monday, Dr. Harold Pease, an expert on the United States Constitution, stated that the authority in dealing with Obamacare funding belongs to the U.S. House, not the U.S. Senate and that the House is doing this all wrong.
Pease said, “Everything hinged upon funding which was given exclusively to the House of Representatives, the only power that they alone had.”
Pease went on to say, “All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. To fund anything, in this case Obamacare, first approval is required by the House of Representatives.”
“If that does not happen taxpayer money cannot be spent. The people, through their representatives to Congress, have determined, after a three-year closer scrutiny of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), that it does not protect the patient, is not affordable and is not even workable; hence in the interests of the vast majority of the people needs to be defunded.”
When the United States Supreme Court ruled on Obamacare in 2012, Chief Justice Roberts stance on Obamacare coincides with the intent of the U.S. Constitution, explained by Pease, and the powers between the House and Senate.
According to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Obamacare cannot be implemented and is not considered the law of the land, contrary to Democrat claims.
Bubba Atkinson of the Independent Journal Review wrote, “Chief Justice Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That is how the Democrats got Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything, ever. The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.”
“Next, he stated that, because Congress doesn’t have the ability to mandate, it must, to fund Obama-care, rely on its power to tax. Therefore, the mechanism that funds Obama-care is a tax,” said Atkinson. “He struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the states — “comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing funding.” Roberts ruled that is a no-no.”
When the House attached Obamacare to the legislation in funding the government, it made a mistake in doing so and the funding of Obamacare should have been separate, thereby giving the Senate no power in denying the Houses’ request to defund Obamacare.
Pease said, “House opposition to funding Obamacare would have been far more powerful if made a “stand alone” bill not attached to general funding, but it is not. “Stand alone,” having no other parts, would have left the Senate no wiggle or compromise room once it went to them, nor would there be for the Joint Conference Committee thereafter that reconciles any differences between the two houses. There would be nothing to reconcile, Obamacare is merely defunded.”
“Still, the intent of the Founding Fathers was to give the people, through their House of Representatives, the power collectively to say no to any proposed federal tax, which she is decidedly doing.”
If Obamacare is removed from the government budget, presented, and voted on as a separate bill, Obamacare can be defunded by the House and the Senate and the President has no constitutional authority to override the House decision.
CIA DNA Test Reveals Barack Obama was ADOPTED
CIA DNA Test Reveals Barack Obama was ADOPTED
OK, I really feel in National Inquirer territory with this one. Thanks to the Ed Schultz Show forums for the info.
- Obama’s mother (Stanley Ann Dunham) and grandmother (Madelyn Dunham) are both still alive, their deaths having been faked. In fact, his mother registered a mortgage in Hawaii just a few weeks ago.
- Obama’s mother worked for the Ford Foundation in connection with its operations in Indonesia. “Indonesia is one of the ‘hot-spots’ for organ trading. Q Are the people currently associated with the building that houses THE FORD FOUNDATION at 320 E. 43rd St. involved in another body organ trafficking ring?”
- With regard to Obama’s mother and her multiple “aliases”: “The multiple addresses under each alias suggest an extreme pattern of money laundering and real estate acquisitions. … (T)he extent of money-laundering, as revealed by means of linking database names and real estate transactions, is staggering. On the basis of the above examples and evidence from other investigations, the numbers of properties involved likely number in the millions and would be worth hundreds of billions of dollars, if not $trillions.”
- “There are said to be photos of Ann Dunham on Waikiki Beach taken in or about July 1961, when she is supposed to have been in her third trimester, in a bikini, taken by a fellow female student. AD is clearly not pregnant.” (Ah, now they’re getting back at us for the Palin pregnancy speculations.)
- “CIA did a DNA test on the grandparents, using saliva from glasses, which conclusively rules out any relationship between Obama and the Dunhams.”
- “Ann Dunham possibly not a America citizen and went to school in Beirut, Lebanon. Possibly the family was smuggled into the US as spies.”
- “Mr. Obama is currently being fed over $250 million in overseas funds.” The money was laundered by means of stolen credit card numbers.
- “We have no idea who Obama is. But this information here says he is a part of something larger than just POTUS.”
- “There are people that think his mother was a CIA cut-out.” (A cut-out, I just learned, is an intermediary that facilitates the exchange of information between agents.)
- “We don’t know if Obama was ‘inserted’ into the family via some sort of adoption or what. We don’t know if the family is a foreign plant, or CIA-backed.”
- “My opinion based on inclonclusive research leads me to believe that the family was tied somehow to the ‘Witness protection program’.” (I can’t wait to see what clonclusions he clomes to when the research is cloncluded.)
- “Fannie Mae invested at least 10 million into the Islamic banking Cooperative microfinancing network. One of the members of this cooperative (one of the largest) is none-other than Bank Raykak of Indonesia –” the same bank Stanley Ann Dunham was a director of the microfinancing program at this bank.” (Remember this clear link to Fannie Mae when we come to the last item on this list.)
- “Frank Marshall Davis was moved to Hawaii by CPUSA. I assumed the same was true of Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham.” (Well, at least one Freeper doesn’t buy the story about the CIA, unless he thinks that the CIA and the Communist Party were working in cahoots.)
- “Don’t forget that when Obama Sr arrived in Hawaii as a foreign exchange student he arrived with a student from Jordan and one from Iran.” (Also don’t forget that, at that time, Iran was ruled by the pro-American Shah, following a U.S.-backed coup in which the CIA helped to oust the democratically elected Mohammed Mosaddeq. Hey, wait a minute, that means there is a CIA connection!)
- The Clintons knew all this stuff but couldn’t use it in the primaries for fear of retaliation by Obama, who knows too much about them: “(H)is family has all the buried skeletons of the clinton-Indonesian-Chicom funding.”
- “I knew they manipulated the markets when obama was down in the polls, which worked and he never looked back after that.”
After claims within the "fifty" fortify their work against any judicial rulings .. Rescue representatives refuse to issue a declaration to fortify the constitutional .. "Abdul Majeed": people Christsn the constitution itself .. "Alaily": proposals have ridden the credibility of the Commission
Raised fortify demands for the Commission "session" to amend the
Constitution, to ensure that no invalidity, widespread anger among civil
forces, which in turn refused to issue a decision from the presidency _
and described Baldictatory _ Ihsnha to ensure that no group stabbed
them .. details ..
McAfee: Obamacare Is a ‘Hacker’s Wet Dream’
'I predict the loss of income, for the millions of Americans who will lose their identities'
McAfee Anti Virus Software founder John McAfee criticized the confusing and insecure online apparatus being used by various states to implement Obamacare exchanges Wednesday on Cavuto.
McAfee said the web aspect of Obamacare is “seriously bad” and “somebody made a grave error” not centralizing the system such that a consumer could go to one page and and see all of the “legitimate” health insurance brokers.
Instead, McAfee warned, any hacker can create a page posing as a health insurance broker and elicit personal information from unassuming consumers:
JOHN MCAFEE: Seriously bad, somebody made
a grave error, not in designing the program, but in implementing the
web aspect. It for example anybody can put up a web pain, and claim —
web page and claim to be a broker for this system, there is no central
place where I can go, and say, here are all of the legitimate brokers,
or examiner for all of the state, and pick and choose one. Instead, any
hacker can put a web site up, make it look competitive, and because of
the nature of the system, this is health care, they can ask you the most
intimate questions, you are freely going to answer them, my social
security number? First date. Birth date.
NEIL CAVUTO: Once you have those two, then you’re off to the races.
MCAFEE: This is not something to software
can solve, who idiot put this system out there and did not create a
central depository. There should be one web site run guy the government,
you can click on the web site and then it will take you to the agents,
this is insane, I predict the loss of income, for the millions of
Americans who will lose their identities, you can imagine some retired
laid in Utah — retired laid in Utah with $75,000 in the bank saving her
whole life, having it wiped out in one day because she signed up for
Obamacare, this is going to happen millions of times, this is a hacker’s
wet dream, I cannot believe they did this.
Sources: Sami Annan contact with leaders of the "rescue" for support in the presidential election .. Democratic Egypt: Front tend to reject his request because of his failure in the management of the transitional period .. Delegation: The only agreement is Sisi shop
Thursday, October 3, 2013 - 01:22
Informed sources told the "seventh day" that the team Sami Annan,
former chief of staff had contacts with a number of leaders of the
National Salvation Front (FIS), in order to get on the front support to
run in the next presidential election.
Adequate
20-07-2013, 01:22 PM
John Boehner: Obama can’t weasel out of the government shutdown: Obama’s failure to communicate, compromise and lead
John Boehner: Obama can’t weasel out of the government shutdown: Obama’s failure to communicate, compromise and lead
Above, apparent recent pic of Republican House Speaker, John Boehner.
This author is cautiously optimistic, thinking that the Republican
leader is finally beginning to oppose Obama’s destruction of America.
Would that Boehner follow through and not obstruct further formal and
legal investigation into the whole [Obama] Benghazi scandal and subsequent cover-up scandal. - Pic attribution – usatoday.com
John Boehner: Obama owns this shutdown now - Washington Democrats have slammed the door on reopening the government. - usatoday.com
Excerpt:
The president isn’t telling the whole story when it comes to the government shutdown. The fact is that Washington Democrats have slammed the door on reopening the government by refusing to engage in bipartisan talks. And, as stories across the country highlight the devastating impact of Obamacare on families and small businesses, they continue to reject our calls for fairness for all Americans. This is part of a larger pattern: the president’s scorched-Earth policy of refusing to negotiate in bipartisan way on his health care law, current government funding, or the debt limit…………….
……….For years, the president has said that in a divided government, no one gets 100% of what they want. But when will his words match his actions?……… - usatoday.com
Related news pieces to the above:
The ObamaCare fight is just beginning (nypost.com)
Health Insurance Markets Open To Surge Of New Customers And Problems – Glitches Hit Websites, Error Messages Rule; Elderly Struggle With Lingo (cbslocal.com)
Open Letter to US House Speaker John Boehner: An internal shift will set you free! (moralmatters.org)
Most everything surrounding Obama is founded upon lies and deception. In fact, the very basis for his White House (de facto) “presidency,” has been his criminal ID fraud; still not (honestly) recognized by his Democrat and Republican enabling criminal co-conspirators. [Above pic, found on the web]
Gallup poll: Harry Reid is the most unpopular congressional leader
Also - Related informational links, below. Note that the links contain within them many other important pertinent and related linked articles:
Also note:
Obama’s lies the State of the Union Address and Americans who love Obama’s lies (moralmatters.org)
Yet, note the following – on the “lighter” side:
Butt lift to be covered under Obama Care: Buyer Beware (dancingczars.wordpress.com)
Also related:
Obama’s lies the State of the Union Address and Americans who love Obama’s lies (moralmatters.org)
Liars go to hell (thechristianmessage.org)
Good News for Americans oppressed by the Obama and his criminal government cabal:
Scriptural Divine Revelation describes the wickedness of Obama and his destruction end (moralmatters.org)
_____________________________________________________
“A thinking person will question what he hears; examine what he sees; and evaluate what others would have him believe.”
“When did big government and its mainstream media ever tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?”
[Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel]
__________________________________
Please note 3 important informational links:Election Projection – The Battle for Capitol Hill – 2012 Senate – electionprojection.com/2012elections/
The Complete List of Email Addresses and Fax Numbers for the U.S. Congress and Governors – conservativeusa.org/
U.S. Constitution Online – usconstitution.net/
Posted by:
Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel
http://www.thechristianmessage.org/
http://moralmatters.org/
Note: Above pics and / or videos found on the web.
The National Security Threat of Big Debt
Or it was, for a split second. Count to ten and the debt immoderately climbs another $100,000. Though the numbers are approximate, past promises made by Washington, and current spending directed by Washington will breach the current debt ceiling of $17 trillion in a few short weeks.
America's debt burden has been a looming national security threat for decades, though one that defied headline writers. Because it doesn't drop bombs, Big Debt could not be framed as an immediate crisis. Its danger is long-term. Moreover, the enemy driving Big Debt is problematic. To paraphrase Walt Kelly's Pogo cartoon character, the enemy -- he is us.
National leaders have made the connection between economic strength and a robust defense. Dwight Eisenhower did. His NSC-162/1 stated that defeating the Soviet Union required the "maintenance of a sound, strong and growing economy" that would underpin U.S. power for "the long pull" of the Cold War.
In the 21st century, Big Debt may be the enemy. In August 2010, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen told CNN that "... the most significant threat to our national security is our debt." Because the ability to arm, man and train a first-rate defense force is "directly related to the health of our economy over time."
Greece's financial crisis, bred by unsustainable debt, demonstrates how quickly economic decline shreds military forces. Moored Greek submarines, grounded jet aircraft and military pay cuts of 37 percent have not balanced budgets in Athens.
Economic decline, accelerated by past promises, also shreds social safety nets and shatters cities. California towns like Vallejo know it. When Vallejo went bankrupt five years ago, city leaders declined political battle with the enormously powerful state public employees retirement system, Calpers, and agreed to treat pension debt as different from other municipal debts.
This week Vallejo announced that pension payments have disrupted its restructured budget, despite cuts in city services. According to Reuters, pension costs for Vallejo cities will rise from 33 to 42 percent in the next five years. Pensions are financial promises based on work performed. California politicians, however, used generous pension increases as a means for securing the political support of public employee unions. These "sweeteners" have turned to fiscal poison. Vallejo has encountered the long term and it is a constant crisis.
What can be done? If Vallejo doesn't seek legal relief from pension debt, other debt-ridden towns will.
In January the Congressional Research Service (CRS) issued a paper entitled "Sovereign Debt in Advanced Economies." The study notes that the debt of sovereign countries that can issue currency differs from private debt or Vallejo's municipal debt. There are no international bankruptcy courts "to provide creditors recourse against governments that refuse to pay their debts." The ability to issue currency means a sovereign government can print more money. This risk is inflation, which reduces the "real" value of the debt but also devalues everything else.
The CRS paper outlined five policy options for addressing debt. (1) Fiscal Consolidation: raise taxes, cut spending. (2) Debt Restructuring: lower and extended payments (Greece). (3) Inflation. (4) Growth: economic policies to spur growth. (5) Financial Repression: force citizens to buy government bonds.
The most interesting discussion addressed Growth. The CRS agreed that growth can be "stimulated" by "expansionary" spending, but that adds more debt. Another option offered debt reduction, albeit long-term: "pursuing structural reforms at the microeconomic level." These include spurring competition in industries and liberalizing trade. It should have added reducing tax complexity and regulatory burdens on small businesses. Growth at the grass roots by encouraging entrepreneurs -- that is the way to attack national debt.
Ah yes -- the debt clock. $16,959, 523,401,634. I think. The last four digits flashed by as I blinked.
I Shouldn't Have To Offer Anything": The GOP's Secret Weapons --President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi
I Shouldn't Have To Offer Anything": The GOP's Secret Weapons --President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi
Hugh Hewitt | Oct 01, 2013
The memorable line from Monday's debate about Obamacare?
The president's astonishing declaration that "I shouldn't have to offer anything." Thus did the American public get a very candid glimpse of the president whose contempt for duly elected Republican opponents is exceeded only by his fecklessness in the face of America's enemies abroad. To Putin and the Iranians come offers of all sorts. To the Speaker of the House, only ultimatums.
Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi also had spectacularly bad days for anyone who was watching. Some pundits don't think Harry's gracelessness and Nancy's strident incoherence don't matter, but they are wrong. Americans notice everything, even if they say very little. They are consumers, making up their minds over time.
We forget just how lousy the Big Three Ds are when it comes to communicating, and today's series of pratfalls should remind every Republican why there is great hope for winning the public opinion battle decisively in the days and weeks ahead, and ultimately for 2014.
As I explained over and over on Monday's show, this week's drama over the shutdown is just one chapter in a book titled "November, 2014." We won't know for a long time if the chapter will be pivotal to the end of the story, but we do know that the chapter's title --"I shouldn't have to offer anything"-- is a great ROI for the first day's effort. The president's stunning display of arrogance in his NPR interview is certain to repeat itself again and again if the House GOP holds the line against the combined forces of the Manhattan-Beltway media elite and a handful of GOP pundits who have talked themselves into believing that all the polls about Obamcare will somehow be magically reversed because 4,000 workers at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration don't report for work Tuesday.
I have long been an opponent of a purposeful shutdown strategy and have been predicting for weeks that this is what the president wanted, especially after the Syrian fiasco exposed him as a bumbler abroad as well as at home. Everything he has touched this year has turned to mud, and his hopes for retaking the House in 2014 are all but gone. Many Republicans including me didn't want any strategy that risked losing the political momentum that the president's ineptitude has created.
But Senator Ted Cruz's speech last week turned my view around. He made a very good argument --not perfect, but very, very good-- and the electric reaction to it, pro and con,underscored that Cruz had done the rarest of things: Captured America's attention. That collective attention is so hard to capture that it usually takes a Super Bowl or an Olympics Opening Ceremony, and only presidential debates or election night specials come close to being mega-events in the political category.
You want mega-events when you have an argument to make, and especially when your debate opponent is as inept as the president is. Today Congressman Tom Cotton of Arkansas and a candidate for that state's Senate seat next year appeared on my show three times with updates on the events in the House, and all three times the calls and emails confirmed that he was making points the audience wanted to hear made. Cotton was rallying opinion. He was carrying on the fight the listeners wanted, and this is a great and necessary thing in a country that needs vibrant political parties, not collections of drones doing the bidding of Beltway elites. The Beltway party should follow the wishes of the rank-and-file and if there is one thing that the commentariat can agree on it is that conservative activists want this fight. That may change, but it hasn't changed yet. The Speaker should persist, and he and his team should continue to listen. It is very easy to see political costs inflicted on the GOPers that break ranks, especially if that choice is perceived as having been made to appease opinion elites.
I am not happy with the decision of the House leadership not to send the Senate "single-subject" CRs since it makes the messaging and record-building harder to accomplish. I would love to see a single subject CR on the Medical Device Tax, for example, as a Senate vote to table that would make it impossible for Senate Democrats who claimed to be against the tax in a non-binding vote in the spring to avoid the flip flop charge if they voted against repeal now. When the tax repeal vote is combined with a delay vote, however, an out is given those same Senate Democrats that will surface in 12 months. So much of this week's events is about a year from now that my lens is adjusted for that time span. Some folks care about next week's polling. I care about next year's, and single subject CRs would help. Perhaps the House leadership will unveil them Tuesday.
However the tactics unfold, the strategy of indelibly defining both the GOP and the Democrats for 2014 must be front and center. Some very smart people like the Washington Post's Jen Rubin think this series of events is defining the GOP negatively. Perhaps she is right and the GOP is deeply injuring itself. I confess I thought the same of the Panama Canal fight in 1978 when I was just leaving college. Then-candidate Ronald Reagan knew better. He was building a movement by being right on an issue at the same time as being visible on an issue. That battle from 35 years ago is a very good example to keep in mind this week, especially when the GOPers genuinely concerned about hurting the chances of retaining the majority in 2014 set sail to their fears.
What is unfortunate about this debate is that the GOP critics of having it feel there is mileage in attacking GOPrs with whom they disagree, often in intensely personal terms. As I noted in a tweet early in the day, if breaking the 11th Commandment required going to Confession, the line would be long indeed. But it doesn't, and indeed there is some small award in some small attention being paid to the uber-critics of Cruz et al.
This will be short-lived satisfaction. Attacking the people attacking Obamacare with everything the various pundits have got is not good politics. It is certainly not statesmanlike. Sticking with the Party is what is necessary now, the same message I will deliver to anyone disappointed with the end game. You only get one quarterback at a time. If they don't win, you can change the QB. There is no upside in turning on him mid-game.
The QB right now is John Boehner. He gave a very good speech on the floor in the early evening on Monday. Good for him. Many others made excellent remarks. Good for them as well. Many folks think the GOP is behind in the debate and in the overall chain of events, but like John Kerry's "I was for the war before I was against it" pratfall, the key moments in this very important debate won't be clear for a long time, though the president's "I shouldn't have to offer anything" homage to absolutism is certain to be among them.
The president, Harry and Nancy are hanging themselves as we speak, nailing their colors to the mast of Obamacare. Let the government stay shuttered for a week and that message sink in. Only good will come of it. But if the House GOP breaks and runs, well, there will be Hell to pay.
The president's astonishing declaration that "I shouldn't have to offer anything." Thus did the American public get a very candid glimpse of the president whose contempt for duly elected Republican opponents is exceeded only by his fecklessness in the face of America's enemies abroad. To Putin and the Iranians come offers of all sorts. To the Speaker of the House, only ultimatums.
Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi also had spectacularly bad days for anyone who was watching. Some pundits don't think Harry's gracelessness and Nancy's strident incoherence don't matter, but they are wrong. Americans notice everything, even if they say very little. They are consumers, making up their minds over time.
We forget just how lousy the Big Three Ds are when it comes to communicating, and today's series of pratfalls should remind every Republican why there is great hope for winning the public opinion battle decisively in the days and weeks ahead, and ultimately for 2014.
As I explained over and over on Monday's show, this week's drama over the shutdown is just one chapter in a book titled "November, 2014." We won't know for a long time if the chapter will be pivotal to the end of the story, but we do know that the chapter's title --"I shouldn't have to offer anything"-- is a great ROI for the first day's effort. The president's stunning display of arrogance in his NPR interview is certain to repeat itself again and again if the House GOP holds the line against the combined forces of the Manhattan-Beltway media elite and a handful of GOP pundits who have talked themselves into believing that all the polls about Obamcare will somehow be magically reversed because 4,000 workers at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration don't report for work Tuesday.
I have long been an opponent of a purposeful shutdown strategy and have been predicting for weeks that this is what the president wanted, especially after the Syrian fiasco exposed him as a bumbler abroad as well as at home. Everything he has touched this year has turned to mud, and his hopes for retaking the House in 2014 are all but gone. Many Republicans including me didn't want any strategy that risked losing the political momentum that the president's ineptitude has created.
But Senator Ted Cruz's speech last week turned my view around. He made a very good argument --not perfect, but very, very good-- and the electric reaction to it, pro and con,underscored that Cruz had done the rarest of things: Captured America's attention. That collective attention is so hard to capture that it usually takes a Super Bowl or an Olympics Opening Ceremony, and only presidential debates or election night specials come close to being mega-events in the political category.
You want mega-events when you have an argument to make, and especially when your debate opponent is as inept as the president is. Today Congressman Tom Cotton of Arkansas and a candidate for that state's Senate seat next year appeared on my show three times with updates on the events in the House, and all three times the calls and emails confirmed that he was making points the audience wanted to hear made. Cotton was rallying opinion. He was carrying on the fight the listeners wanted, and this is a great and necessary thing in a country that needs vibrant political parties, not collections of drones doing the bidding of Beltway elites. The Beltway party should follow the wishes of the rank-and-file and if there is one thing that the commentariat can agree on it is that conservative activists want this fight. That may change, but it hasn't changed yet. The Speaker should persist, and he and his team should continue to listen. It is very easy to see political costs inflicted on the GOPers that break ranks, especially if that choice is perceived as having been made to appease opinion elites.
I am not happy with the decision of the House leadership not to send the Senate "single-subject" CRs since it makes the messaging and record-building harder to accomplish. I would love to see a single subject CR on the Medical Device Tax, for example, as a Senate vote to table that would make it impossible for Senate Democrats who claimed to be against the tax in a non-binding vote in the spring to avoid the flip flop charge if they voted against repeal now. When the tax repeal vote is combined with a delay vote, however, an out is given those same Senate Democrats that will surface in 12 months. So much of this week's events is about a year from now that my lens is adjusted for that time span. Some folks care about next week's polling. I care about next year's, and single subject CRs would help. Perhaps the House leadership will unveil them Tuesday.
However the tactics unfold, the strategy of indelibly defining both the GOP and the Democrats for 2014 must be front and center. Some very smart people like the Washington Post's Jen Rubin think this series of events is defining the GOP negatively. Perhaps she is right and the GOP is deeply injuring itself. I confess I thought the same of the Panama Canal fight in 1978 when I was just leaving college. Then-candidate Ronald Reagan knew better. He was building a movement by being right on an issue at the same time as being visible on an issue. That battle from 35 years ago is a very good example to keep in mind this week, especially when the GOPers genuinely concerned about hurting the chances of retaining the majority in 2014 set sail to their fears.
What is unfortunate about this debate is that the GOP critics of having it feel there is mileage in attacking GOPrs with whom they disagree, often in intensely personal terms. As I noted in a tweet early in the day, if breaking the 11th Commandment required going to Confession, the line would be long indeed. But it doesn't, and indeed there is some small award in some small attention being paid to the uber-critics of Cruz et al.
This will be short-lived satisfaction. Attacking the people attacking Obamacare with everything the various pundits have got is not good politics. It is certainly not statesmanlike. Sticking with the Party is what is necessary now, the same message I will deliver to anyone disappointed with the end game. You only get one quarterback at a time. If they don't win, you can change the QB. There is no upside in turning on him mid-game.
The QB right now is John Boehner. He gave a very good speech on the floor in the early evening on Monday. Good for him. Many others made excellent remarks. Good for them as well. Many folks think the GOP is behind in the debate and in the overall chain of events, but like John Kerry's "I was for the war before I was against it" pratfall, the key moments in this very important debate won't be clear for a long time, though the president's "I shouldn't have to offer anything" homage to absolutism is certain to be among them.
The president, Harry and Nancy are hanging themselves as we speak, nailing their colors to the mast of Obamacare. Let the government stay shuttered for a week and that message sink in. Only good will come of it. But if the House GOP breaks and runs, well, there will be Hell to pay.
Why Isn't Obama in Jail?
Why Isn't Obama in Jail?
1.
Obama is using US tax dollars to fund terrorists. These terrorists are
beheading Christians by the thousands. Funding their murders is a
crime against humanity. Funding the enemies of America is treason.
Using US tax dollars for these goals is misappropriation of funds.
2.
Obama cannot show any verifiable evidence that he is a US citizen via
birth certificate, social security card or college transcripts. A
certified birth certificate for him is not available through the US
government. Those that claim he is a US citizen no longer defend his
forged birth certificate. They simply state "it does not matter whether
he is a US citizen or not."
3. Obama holds a position that he has the right to declare war at his whim without the approval of the US Congress.
4. Obama has committed numerous provable impeachable acts. http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-13-impeachable-offenses/
Why isn't Obama in jail?
Uncovered Muslim Brotherhood Documents Could Put Obama In Prison
Uncovered Muslim Brotherhood Documents Could Put Obama In Prison
August 31, 2013 by 334 Comments
When Morsi was deposed, the Egyptian military discovered a treasure trove of documents linking the Obama regime with the illegal activities of the Muslim Brotherhood.
One such document is a list of Muslim Brotherhood officials receiving secret bribes in U.S. currency, paid out by the U.S. consulate, amounting to millions of dollars.
Investigative journalist Jerome Corsi has obtained a copy of the document held by the Egyptian military, proving the Obama regime sent millions of dollars in bribes to the Muslim Brotherhood.
But who was managing all of this money? Did the Muslim Brotherhood walk around with hundreds of thousands of dollars in their pockets?
The President’s brother…is one of the architects of the major investments of the Muslim Brotherhood.We’re not just talking about the bribes the Muslim Brotherhood received in Egypt, but the entire Muslim Brotherhood finances—worldwide—that more than likely included an astounding $8 billion dollar bribe to the Muslim Brotherhood made by the Obama regime. The bribe was payment to guarantee that the huge tract of Egyptian land, the Sinai Peninsula, be turned over to the Muslim Brotherhood sister group Hamas, undoubtably to put Israel in an indefensible position. The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas mince no words about their goals for Israel: total annihilation.
According to Egypt Daily News, a document exists showing the eight billion dollar “holocaust” agreement with the Obama administration that was signed by former Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi and his second in command Khairat Al-Shater, both under arrest by the Egyptian military for murder and treason.
Does this document really exist, showing the $8 billion dollar bribe signed by Obama or one of his representatives?
Undoubtably.
According to Khairat Al-Shater’s son, Saad Al-Shater, prior to being arrested by the Egyptian military, his father was in possession of information linking Obama with the Muslim Brotherhood that he says would put Obama in prison.
As reported by a multitude of Arabic news sources:
In an interview with the Anatolia News Agency, Saad Al-Shater, the son of a Muslim Brotherhood leader, the detained Khairat Al-Shater said that his father had in his hand evidence that will land the head of United States of America, President Obama, in prison.If the Egyptian military releases this document, it would no doubt spell the end of the Obama presidency, bringing impeachment, a long prison term, and perhaps even the death penalty.
“Loophole” from Obama’s IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver… click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >
The Obama Endorsement Curse! Is Barack Obama Personally Responsible for the Crash of Blackberry?
When
Barack Obama insisted on keeping his beloved BlackBerry when he got to
the Oval Office, it was heralded as a moment of change, another defining
difference between the tech-savvy new president and the Luddites he was
replacing.
"I'm clinging to my BlackBerry," he
said before his 2009 inauguration and the president-to-be got his way
with the Secret Service. A special BlackBerry cleared security hurdles.
Now,
in 2013, the company known as the father of the modern smart phone is
circling the drain and will likely be split up and sold off due to
dismal performance numbers. Is Blackberry the victim of the Obama
endorsement curse?
Below is a list of energy companies backed by President Barack Obama and funded by the American people that have failed. (via sodahead.com)
Solar Trust of America: FAIL - Filed Bankruptcy in Oakland, CA, April 3, 2012 – On April 2, 2012
Bright Source: FAIL - Bright Source warned Obama's Energy Department officials in March 2011 that delays in approving a $1.6 billion U.S. loan guarantee would embarrass the White House and force the solar-energycompany to close. Lost Billions of dollars but Getting More Money To Keep Trying. Can you say, "This isnt working?"
Solyndra: FAIL - Obama gave Solyndra $500,000,000 in taxpayer money and Solyndra shut its doors and laid off 1100 workers in August 2011 After Billions in Losses due to failure to make a solar product that works!
LSP Energy: FAIL - LSPEnergy LP filed bankruptcy protection and a sale of its assets in Feb 2012
Energy Conversion Devices: FAIL – On February 14, 2012 Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. and its subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy
Abound Solar: FAIL - Abound Solar received a $400 million loan guarantee from Barack Obama announced in June, 2012 that it would file for bankruptcy
SunPower: FAIL – SunPower stopped producing solar cells last year at near bankruptcy restructured only with help of, get this, oil giant TOTAL who owns 60% stake. Irony! Still
Beacon Power: FAIL – Beacon Power Corp filed for bankruptcy Oct 2011 just a year after Obama approved $43 million loan Government loan guarantee
Ecotality: FAIL - ECOtality, a San Francisco green-tech company that never earned any money on the verge of bankruptcy after receiving roughly $115 million in two loan guarantees from Obama
A123 Solar: FAIL-A123 received $279 million from taxpayers thanks to President Obama's Department of Energy loan guarantees and after Solyndra bankruptcy is getting another $500M from Obama and it has lost $400M
UniSolar: FAIL - Uni-Solar filed for Ch 11 bankruptcy in June 20 this year laid off hundreds got more Obama money still failing but still in business
Azure Dynamics: FAIL - Azure Dynamics files for bankruptcy in June ter millions in Obama "Stimulus"
Evergreen Solar: FAIL - Evergreen Solar received $527 Million in Taxpayer money from Obama filed bankruptcy
Ener1: FAIL received more than $100 million in government funding from the Obama administration filed for bankruptcy January 2012
Update: In May 2012 Obama visited a dusty, desert town 30 miles outside Las Vegas Wednesday to declare he's doubling down on failed federal efforts to boost the solar industry which has NEVER proven to produce a single working product. Like Socialism, no evidence it works, but they just keep doubling down on the failed ideals!
Bright Source: FAIL - Bright Source warned Obama's Energy Department officials in March 2011 that delays in approving a $1.6 billion U.S. loan guarantee would embarrass the White House and force the solar-energycompany to close. Lost Billions of dollars but Getting More Money To Keep Trying. Can you say, "This isnt working?"
Solyndra: FAIL - Obama gave Solyndra $500,000,000 in taxpayer money and Solyndra shut its doors and laid off 1100 workers in August 2011 After Billions in Losses due to failure to make a solar product that works!
LSP Energy: FAIL - LSPEnergy LP filed bankruptcy protection and a sale of its assets in Feb 2012
Energy Conversion Devices: FAIL – On February 14, 2012 Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. and its subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy
Abound Solar: FAIL - Abound Solar received a $400 million loan guarantee from Barack Obama announced in June, 2012 that it would file for bankruptcy
SunPower: FAIL – SunPower stopped producing solar cells last year at near bankruptcy restructured only with help of, get this, oil giant TOTAL who owns 60% stake. Irony! Still
Beacon Power: FAIL – Beacon Power Corp filed for bankruptcy Oct 2011 just a year after Obama approved $43 million loan Government loan guarantee
Ecotality: FAIL - ECOtality, a San Francisco green-tech company that never earned any money on the verge of bankruptcy after receiving roughly $115 million in two loan guarantees from Obama
A123 Solar: FAIL-A123 received $279 million from taxpayers thanks to President Obama's Department of Energy loan guarantees and after Solyndra bankruptcy is getting another $500M from Obama and it has lost $400M
UniSolar: FAIL - Uni-Solar filed for Ch 11 bankruptcy in June 20 this year laid off hundreds got more Obama money still failing but still in business
Azure Dynamics: FAIL - Azure Dynamics files for bankruptcy in June ter millions in Obama "Stimulus"
Evergreen Solar: FAIL - Evergreen Solar received $527 Million in Taxpayer money from Obama filed bankruptcy
Ener1: FAIL received more than $100 million in government funding from the Obama administration filed for bankruptcy January 2012
Update: In May 2012 Obama visited a dusty, desert town 30 miles outside Las Vegas Wednesday to declare he's doubling down on failed federal efforts to boost the solar industry which has NEVER proven to produce a single working product. Like Socialism, no evidence it works, but they just keep doubling down on the failed ideals!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)