Saturday, April 13, 2013
Backside of Barack Obama's 1961 (2009 certified copy) Coast Province General Hospital, Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya, Certificate of Birth. http://www.scribd.com/doc/134574203/Backside-of-Barack-Obama-s-1961-2009-certified-copy-Coast-Province-General-Hospital-Mombasa-British-Protectorate-of-Kenya-Certificate-of-Birth
Retention of Birth Evidence”. US Passport Office, Department of State (1953).
Pictured
in the two photographs below: Your faithful and objective
investigative reporter InspectorSmith (Lucas Daniel Smith) and his
ardent research assistant in the midst of a reading up on presidential
eligibility related data and also doing a little laundry.
What birth certificate or evidence of birth did Barack Hussein Obama II use when he applied for his first US Passport?
I understand that as [de facto] President of the United States of America, Barack Obama has a new, presidential, passport:
Furthermore, while Barack Obama served as US Senator from Illinois (2005 thru 2008) I’m not certain whether or not he was issued a unique government passport.
I am however somewhat certain that as a Illinois State Senator (1997 thru 2004), Barack Obama, was not issued a unique passport. Like most other state senators and congressmen/women he probably would have used the same sort of US passport that any other citizen of the USA would have used.
Barring, excluding or aside from Barack Hussein Obama II’s birth in Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya, in the year 1961, when was the first time that Obama traveled outside of the physical confines and boundaries of the United States of America?
The reason I ask is because I’d like to know approximately what year that Obama applied for his first US Passport.
From my reading (and my review posted at scribd.com) of his brother George Obama’s book, “Homeland: An Extraordinary Story of Hope and Survival“, at pages 17 thru 18, I’ve ascertained that, according to his brother George Obama, Barack Hussein Obama II was in Kenya at some point in or around the the year 1987 (or perhaps 1988).
I’ve also read, elsewhere, that Obama traveled to Pakistan (and Indonesia) in the year 1981. It appears that his travel to Pakistan was not known to the general public prior to some point in the year 2008 when Obama was campaigning for Office of US President. It appears that Obama himself made the admission at a 2008 fundraiser in San Francisco, California when he stated, “…I traveled to Pakistan when I was in college — I knew what Sunni and Shia was [sic] before I joined the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.”
We also understand, from numerous sources, that Obama lived in Indonesia for approximately four (or perhaps more?) years as a child. Most sources list 1967 thru 1971.
In the 1960s, or specifically 1967, did the child of a US citizen mother need a US passport to travel internationally? In other words, did Obama’s mother apply for a US passport for her child, Barack Obama, at some point in or prior to the year 1967?
Or was a US passport not obtained until some point later in, or near, 1981 when Obama traveled to Pakistan and Indonesia as an adult? Some have speculated that Obama traveled under a foreign passport in 1981. I have not been able to affirm or substantiate such claims nor have I have been able to discredit such claims.
If Obama didn’t have a US passport by, or in, the year 1981 surely he must have applied for one prior to his 1987 (0r perhaps 1988) travel to Kenya?
There was a time when the US Passport Office permanently retained the tangible birth evidence supplied in applications submitted for US passports. I have the US Passport Office, US Department of State and the US Passport Office’s then Director, R.B. Shipley, on record stating just that on a tangible document that is titled, RETENTION OF BIRTH EVIDENCE (year 1953):
“The evidence of birth submitted in connection with your application for a passport is being retained in the Department’s files since it establishes your acquisition of American citizenship and the right to apply for a passport of this Government. If you desire a copy of such evidence for your personal use, it may usually be obtained from the original source of issue. In those infrequent instances where this is not possible, the Department will furnish a photostatic copy of the evidence you submitted upon the receipt of an appropriate request.
“In view of the pressure of other work and the limited personnel facilities available to this Office, copies of such evidence should not be requested except in cases of actual need. The evidence of birth you submitted is in safekeeping in the files of this Office should you find it necessary to obtain a copy thereof at some future date. Your passport itself is evidence of the date and place of your birth as well as of your American citizenship.”
The original birth evidence documentation submitted in the passport application was not, at any point, returned to you. Said documentation was held in safekeeping in the files of the US Passport Office. Additionally, if you needed a copy of your birth evidence you were advised to seek such a copy from the original source of issue. Only as a last resort would the US Passport Office supply you with a ‘photostatic’ copy of the birth documentation that you supplied in your passport application. Your original and tangible birth document was not, at any point, returned to you.
I have the above referenced document in my personal possession and have subsequently scanned and uploaded to my Patriot1980 scribd.com account for review and embedded it below:
1954. ‘Retention of Birth Evidence’, letter/note to US Passport applicant Mary Catherine Bergamo from R.B. …
When (what year) did the US Passport Office, Department of State, United States of America, stop retaining the documentation supplied as evidence of birth in applications submitted for passports?
I applied for my first US Passport in the year 2006 after learning that it was probably going to become a law, as early as sometime in 2007 in the United States of America, that I could no longer travel back to the USA from the Dominican Republic using my birth certificate and state drivers license/identification card.
For the record, I used my ‘short form‘ birth certificate (Iowa) as evidence of birth in the USA when I applying for my US Passport. I applied for my passport at a United States Post Office in Los Angeles, California. At the time that I submitted my passport application I learned that my tangible birth certificate would be attached with the application and that my tangible birth certificate would be returned to me, along with my newly issued US passport, in a couple of weeks in the US postal mail.
At some point in time, prior (probably much prior) to my 2006 passport application, the policy of the retaining birth evidence must have changed. When it changed I do not know.
I’d like to know two things:
a. When (what year) did the US Passport Office, Department of State change their policy of retaining birth evidence.
b. When (what year) did Barack Hussein Obama II apply for his first US Passport?
If the US Passport Office, Department of State did retain the birth evidence (birth certificate/birth record) that was submitted in Barack Hussein Obama II’s first passport application is that birth certificate/birth record the same document that was released to the public in April, 2011:
Barack Obama Birth Certificate Long Form. 1961, Hawaii. Certificate of Live Birth.
Or was the birth evidence slightly different?
If it was a Hawaiian birth record/document did it reflect that the birth was recorded by way of an affidavit rather than Hawaiian hospital/doctor documentation?
Alternatively, though probably less likely, is it possible that the birth evidence might have been a report or a certificate issued by the US Government which reflected the birth of a US citizen abroad?
I challenge and implore the readers of this blog to help me with this particular investigation. Put on your thinking caps and fill the comments sections below with your thoughts, ideas, opinions, hunches, recommendations and corrections!
Thank you!
Obama Part of Group Locked Up at Russian Airport
WASHINGTON, DC -- Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) were not allowed to leave a Russian airport Sunday and were locked in a room briefly.
The incident prevented their departure for about three hours, but Obama told the Sun-Times "it ended up not being a very big deal."
The senators had their passports seized by local officials at an airport in Perm. Obama said the officials demanded, unsuccessfully, to inspect the DC-9 military aircraft being used by the congressional delegation for the trip.
'It wasn't the gulag'
"We were in a lounge with a locked door at one point," Obama said. "It wasn't the gulag.''
Obama, who will meet with Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko today in Kiev, is on his first foreign visit as senator. He said he was never concerned that the group would be taken into custody, because after all, "we are a couple of U.S. senators."
Although he was on a first-time diplomatic mission, Obama has traveled extensively, spending part of his youth in Indonesia and visiting Kenya, where his father was born. He noted that as a back- packing college student he had "a lot less leverage than this time."
Obama, a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, and Lugar, its chairman, left Wednesday for a trip to inspect sites where nuclear and biological weapons are slated to be destroyed in Russia, Ukraine and Azerbaijan. On Sunday, the U.S. group was scheduled to fly from Perm to Kiev, Ukraine. But border guards wanted proof that the group's aircraft -- which Obama said looked like a "mini-Air Force One" -- was really an official U.S. government plane, which would be exempt from an inspection.
Robert Gibbs, Obama's spokesman traveling with him, said in an e-mail that "the border guards took our passports and demanded to inspect our aircraft, which we refused. We were moved to a room to wait."
"At one point they were demanding to inspect virtually everything, including the gifts their representatives at the missile facility had given us." The border guard said "they were acting on the authority of the FSB," the Russian intelligence agency.
While the delegation waited, there were calls between Washington, the U.S. ambassador in Moscow and the Russian Foreign Ministry, Obama and Gibbs said.
Obama said local officials at first were not convinced the United States had obtained proper permission for an international flight to depart from Perm.
'Blagojevich of Perm' helps out
"The Russian Federation only allows [international] departures from three airports in the country, not from Perm," Obama said.
Documentation that the senators had permission "had not trickled down" to Perm, Obama said. He said the matter was resolved with the intervention of the region's governor, the "Rod Blagojevich of Perm."
During their travels to Russia for the purposes of nuclear disarmament
talks, the delegation was detained at the Russian airport of Perm by the
FSB for about three hours in August 2005. The Russian FSB confiscated Barack Hussein Obama’s passport.
Initial reports indicated an irregularity with his passport, although
subsequent reports downplayed the incident. What was the real reason for
this very strange detention, and what does the FSB know about Obama’s
passport that Americans have been prevented to see?
The Victims and Crimes of Communism from 1917 to the Present
Recorded on June 12, 2007Location: The Heritage Foundation's Allison Auditorium
It is a grave moral failing of our age that the full extent of communism's inhumanity to man is not known. Who knows that more than 100 million people have died under communism since the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917? Who realizes that more than one fifth of the world's population still lives - and not by their choice - under communism?
This tragic oversight will be corrected, at least in part, with the dedication of the Victims of Communism Memorial on Tuesday, June 12, at its Capitol Hill site, two blocks from Union Station.
As part of the day's activities, a distinguished panel of historians, dissident leaders and former political prisoners will hold a roundtable discussion on the costs of communism and what it was like to live under a communist regime.
We Already Have One World Government
What Do You Think About the One World Government?
Is the One World Government Already Established?
See results without voting
Ads by Google
A wealthy businessman says a single day will soon change the US forever
$225,000 Mortgage $889mo. 2.5% apr Low Rate Government Mortgage Plan!
Major Revaluation Imminent… BUT It's Not Our Top Pick. This One Is…
Important Update: What Is the Status of the New World Order?
The
Germans are teetering with whether to bail out the PIIGS nations, or
not, and the Euro is in crisis. So far, Germany is a safe haven.
However, how long will that safe haven status last? One thinks of the
Germans as the haves. The PIIGS are the haves not. But Germany has low
home ownership, and the PIIGS have high homeownership. The Germans rely
on manufacturing to stay strong. The PIIGS cannot buy that manufacturing
without some sort of bailout or stronger European Union. The Germans do
not want that stronger union at this time.
So, what can folks watch for regarding the Eurozone going forward? We know that German manufacturing continues to be weak. How long can Germany remain a safe haven if she has no place to sell her goods? As long as capital flees from the rest of Europe to Germany, the New Financial Order is weakened, to be sure. If that capital ever starts to flee Germany, then perhaps the One World Financial System will remain intact.
I am no fan of the New World Financial System, which is predatory in lending, but I am concerned about the massive derivatives that the worlds' banks have strapped to their bodies, making any effort to cross this financial system, as Germany is doing, very, very painful and dangerous for the world.
I may be proven wrong, but it seems like Germany lost her sovereignty when she let her banks lend easy money to the PIIGS nations when they entered the Euro. She could be vulnerable to capital flight, but only time will tell. Auctions for her bonds are sometimes weak, and that is a telling sign as to how the cabal will choose to push Germany around.
The 5 Wise Men, which as of the time of this writing includes a woman from Switzerland who used to work at the World Bank and the IMF, are advising Germany. As long as these folks have the ear of the Germans, you can bet that the New World Order is fighting to get Germany to bend to the bankers' way. Of course these 5 folks, who could literally control all of Europe, are influencing harsh financial measures for the PIIGS nations as well.
Update: Turns out that Germany has apparently buckled and has allowed the easy money to flow from the ECB but continues to waver. The real tussle revolves around the banks and the other sovereign nations in the Eurozone. The banks have weapons of mass destruction strapped to them.
But the sovereign nations can simply fail to impose austerity, which is actually a wise action. Then if the banks refuse to play along they become the big losers. The debtors are big enough to take the banks down, and Spain knows this. So does Italy. The banks have become a little too smug and smart for their own good, I think. I look for banks to be forced to buy sovereign debt no matter what, since they are now locked into the fate of the nations themselves!
So, what can folks watch for regarding the Eurozone going forward? We know that German manufacturing continues to be weak. How long can Germany remain a safe haven if she has no place to sell her goods? As long as capital flees from the rest of Europe to Germany, the New Financial Order is weakened, to be sure. If that capital ever starts to flee Germany, then perhaps the One World Financial System will remain intact.
I am no fan of the New World Financial System, which is predatory in lending, but I am concerned about the massive derivatives that the worlds' banks have strapped to their bodies, making any effort to cross this financial system, as Germany is doing, very, very painful and dangerous for the world.
I may be proven wrong, but it seems like Germany lost her sovereignty when she let her banks lend easy money to the PIIGS nations when they entered the Euro. She could be vulnerable to capital flight, but only time will tell. Auctions for her bonds are sometimes weak, and that is a telling sign as to how the cabal will choose to push Germany around.
The 5 Wise Men, which as of the time of this writing includes a woman from Switzerland who used to work at the World Bank and the IMF, are advising Germany. As long as these folks have the ear of the Germans, you can bet that the New World Order is fighting to get Germany to bend to the bankers' way. Of course these 5 folks, who could literally control all of Europe, are influencing harsh financial measures for the PIIGS nations as well.
Update: Turns out that Germany has apparently buckled and has allowed the easy money to flow from the ECB but continues to waver. The real tussle revolves around the banks and the other sovereign nations in the Eurozone. The banks have weapons of mass destruction strapped to them.
But the sovereign nations can simply fail to impose austerity, which is actually a wise action. Then if the banks refuse to play along they become the big losers. The debtors are big enough to take the banks down, and Spain knows this. So does Italy. The banks have become a little too smug and smart for their own good, I think. I look for banks to be forced to buy sovereign debt no matter what, since they are now locked into the fate of the nations themselves!
Further Eurozone Study
- EUROBONDS: The REAL Euro Endgame You Should Be Watching
Eurobonds > ECB. - Homeownership Rates Help To Explain The Tension Between Germany And Italy
Of course the Germans don't want inflation. - Andrew Alexander Believes The Euro Is A Conspiracy
The United States of Europe is a huge leap of faith.
The City of London Is Engaged in Massive Speculation
The
City of London is in the news. That square mile of financial degeneracy
is certainly worse than even the Eurozone. Yes Germany wants an empire,
but the UK already has the empire, and MF Global loses money there. Big
banks take risk there. There is hypothecation and re-hypothecation
there. Check out the Max Kaiser video if you want to be alarmed about
the City of London, which, by the way, has no parliamentary control over
it.
All About Re-hypothecation
Max Kaiser on Regulation
- Capitalism Needs Regulation – Why Max Keiser is Correct and Libertarians are Mistaken &
Max Kaiser just can't understand the libertarian position.
Americans are Deceived by Media Regarding Who Is Running the Country
Americans
blame congress rather than the banking cartel for the problems in the
financial crisis. I guess that they don't understand because the media,
owned by the cartel, has brainwashed them. Listen up people, 1/2 of 1
percent own 38 percent of the wealth in the world. Their banks and
central banks are responsible for toxic loans, bailouts without taxpayer
safety nets and for illegal foreclosures. Get past the main stream
media people, and you can learn the truth about the international
financial cabal!
George Soros, Glenn Beck and the New World Order
Update:
The New World Order is a financial order, a financial one world
government, that is supported by mainstream Republicans and Democrats.
It is a world order that is not a political order but is rather an
economic order. However, there are some flaws and dangers regarding this
NWO. First of all, as I have said many times on this hub, the new economic order attacked mainstreet with ponzi loans and robbed us.
However I have said many times that our only means of fighting the new
financial order is through peaceful rejection of their bad loans and bad
products that have the effect of legally stealing through high
interest. Easy money loans start out great but end badly with interest
too great to bear. These loans must be resisted by mainstreet citizens
everywhere.
I oppose the violence that Byron Williams had begun after listening to Glenn Beck's one sided view of the NWO. Beck makes it a Democratic issue when both parties are involved, with Kissenger, Soros,the Clintons, H W Bush and others who have called for this financial order for decades. The Rockefellers and others in private industry have spoken out for a new financial order.
But I don't trust Glenn Beck. Beck should be telling people how to resist this order peacefully but he usually just speaks and lets the chips fall where they may. He is using the issue that has some truth to it for his ends, to rile people up. One of these guys, Byron Williams, decided to use violence to start a revolution after listening to Beck and others.
Certainly with the issues surrounding the shootings in Arizona, people need to do what I have always said, make clear what the issues are and then resist peacefully. And with Palin talking about targets and all that, and acting like a bully, there is a good reason that people say Palin's rhetoric could have incited the unstable soul in Arizona to over the top behavior. There is no proof but we have Byron Williams as an example of what people can do based on media. This is something to think about.
I have always viewed the Republicans as the worse of two very evil parties, not willing to protect the US against USURY and other financial crimes. Both parties are terrible in selling out to big finance, but the Republicans have that penchant for language that bullies and for war that makes them even more unacceptable.
With regard to Glenn Beck, his talking points are the talking points of the John Birch Society which I reject. The Birch Society has influenced the Tea Party in a very bad way. It is elitist, and it views the corporatism of the NWO as being communistic. It is not communistic when the corporations control the government. Communism is the permanent control of corporations by government. That is not what we have. When the private banksters collect the profits, it is not communism! Only the losses are socialized now. The Birchers want a new cold war and that is absurd.
The father of the Koch Brothers, who influence Beck, was a cofounder of the John Birch Society. These are political opportunists and liars. I repeat, it is a lie to label corporatism, as Ron Paul puts it, as being communism. Ron Paul has stated in 2010 that Beck and Palin would take the Tea Party for a ride. Now you know what he really thinks of them.
I respect Paul's peaceful and thoughtful approach towards resisting the new financial order and his understanding that this new order is not communistic. Paul Volcker was asked to leave the Obama team because the Republicans won the election. The only sane man on the Obama team is now gone all because the Republicans want to blow another ponzi somewhere and give the big banks license to do so.
Link: Soros View of NWO
Link: Conservatives and Liberals Are Both Wrong About Inequality
I oppose the violence that Byron Williams had begun after listening to Glenn Beck's one sided view of the NWO. Beck makes it a Democratic issue when both parties are involved, with Kissenger, Soros,the Clintons, H W Bush and others who have called for this financial order for decades. The Rockefellers and others in private industry have spoken out for a new financial order.
But I don't trust Glenn Beck. Beck should be telling people how to resist this order peacefully but he usually just speaks and lets the chips fall where they may. He is using the issue that has some truth to it for his ends, to rile people up. One of these guys, Byron Williams, decided to use violence to start a revolution after listening to Beck and others.
Certainly with the issues surrounding the shootings in Arizona, people need to do what I have always said, make clear what the issues are and then resist peacefully. And with Palin talking about targets and all that, and acting like a bully, there is a good reason that people say Palin's rhetoric could have incited the unstable soul in Arizona to over the top behavior. There is no proof but we have Byron Williams as an example of what people can do based on media. This is something to think about.
I have always viewed the Republicans as the worse of two very evil parties, not willing to protect the US against USURY and other financial crimes. Both parties are terrible in selling out to big finance, but the Republicans have that penchant for language that bullies and for war that makes them even more unacceptable.
With regard to Glenn Beck, his talking points are the talking points of the John Birch Society which I reject. The Birch Society has influenced the Tea Party in a very bad way. It is elitist, and it views the corporatism of the NWO as being communistic. It is not communistic when the corporations control the government. Communism is the permanent control of corporations by government. That is not what we have. When the private banksters collect the profits, it is not communism! Only the losses are socialized now. The Birchers want a new cold war and that is absurd.
The father of the Koch Brothers, who influence Beck, was a cofounder of the John Birch Society. These are political opportunists and liars. I repeat, it is a lie to label corporatism, as Ron Paul puts it, as being communism. Ron Paul has stated in 2010 that Beck and Palin would take the Tea Party for a ride. Now you know what he really thinks of them.
I respect Paul's peaceful and thoughtful approach towards resisting the new financial order and his understanding that this new order is not communistic. Paul Volcker was asked to leave the Obama team because the Republicans won the election. The only sane man on the Obama team is now gone all because the Republicans want to blow another ponzi somewhere and give the big banks license to do so.
Link: Soros View of NWO
Link: Conservatives and Liberals Are Both Wrong About Inequality
The Root Causes of the Housing Bubble Revealed!
  |
Amazon Price: $1.99
|
Basel's Little Helper is Wells Fargo Bank!
- Wells Fargo Bank Leads Securitization Attack On Taxpayers
Wells Fargo bank wants the government to guarantee all mortgages and has threatened to make the 30 year mortgage obsolete if the bank doesn't get what it wants. I have been writing about this subject of...
Must See Video about Occupy Wall Street
Nice to See Others Agree with My Assessment of the Wall Street Power Grab
  |
Amazon Price: $8.36
List Price: $15.95 |
Rand Paul and the New World Order
Update:
I didn't write this page on One World Government to have Rand Paul come
around and say that we cannot punish the rich. While I don't think
higher and necessary taxes punish the top 5 or 10 percent of income
earners, the NWO rich are the reason that we are in the mess that we are
in. Perhaps Ron Paul will tap his wayward son on the shoulder and
whisper some common sense into his ear. The lack of legal punishment of
the central bankers and investment bankers and scam lenders and shadow banksters contributes to why we are where we are. It does no good for Rand Paul to say that there is a NWO and then turn around and lick the boots of that very same NWO.
The top 20 percent of Americans control about 85 percent of total wealth in the United States. The top 10 percent control 70 percent of total wealth in the United States. The top 20 percent control 60 percent of the income. These people, some though not all, go around and tell us that it is socialism to make these people pay more taxes. I realize things got out of hand when tax rates for the rich swung to 90 percent of income. The system is fairer now. However, perhaps it is time to consider a total wealth tax. It seems that the top 20 percent control a greater percentage of wealth than they do of income. That is an interesting dichotomy. Is income, as opposed to property declarations, hidden? If so, this is hurting America big time.
If it weren't for the NWO we would not have people coming onto the Seeking Alpha boards telling me that it was buyer beware regarding lending and people should not have trusted banks and accepted scam toxic loans. Well, ifbankers want to be known as nothing more than shyster Used Car Salesmen, then they need to shout it and let us know they cannot be trusted.
The top 20 percent of Americans control about 85 percent of total wealth in the United States. The top 10 percent control 70 percent of total wealth in the United States. The top 20 percent control 60 percent of the income. These people, some though not all, go around and tell us that it is socialism to make these people pay more taxes. I realize things got out of hand when tax rates for the rich swung to 90 percent of income. The system is fairer now. However, perhaps it is time to consider a total wealth tax. It seems that the top 20 percent control a greater percentage of wealth than they do of income. That is an interesting dichotomy. Is income, as opposed to property declarations, hidden? If so, this is hurting America big time.
If it weren't for the NWO we would not have people coming onto the Seeking Alpha boards telling me that it was buyer beware regarding lending and people should not have trusted banks and accepted scam toxic loans. Well, ifbankers want to be known as nothing more than shyster Used Car Salesmen, then they need to shout it and let us know they cannot be trusted.
My Little Letter to the Federal Reserve Governors
My
letter follows below. Clearly, the New World Order is a business and
economic order. But it is a business order that fleeced the American
people in the ponzi loan scheme. This is the problem with it. On the
surface, the NWO looks benign, just bringing countries together in free
trade. However, one world government is not benign, and has proven
itself to be far from benign. After all, the ponzi housing scheme and the subsequent credit crisis caused a huge transfer of wealth to be shifted from the middle classes to the world's wealthiest people.
Originally, the European nations wanted a union of sorts, in order to prevent war. They convinced the United States and most western nations to go along with this new economic order. However, what started out as being benevolent became an abuse of power by the big international banks. It is my belief that this consolidation of bank powers by the richest nations, to make it easier to abuse mainstreet, was always the goal.
Basel 2 was supposed to be an accord that raised capital requirements, and that may one day still occur. But in 1998, under the nose of the BIS, the Basel 2 accord allowed low capital requirements along with the fraudulent off balance sheet banking. This fraud continued after Enron was destroyed by off balance sheet accounting, yet the bankers got bonuses for it! The power is in this banker cabal that is above the law.
We can peacefully fight this New World Order in our daily lives. But who do we fight? Well, not only are most Democrats for the NWO, so are most Republicans, including many who claim to support the Tea Party.
Feel free to copy this letter that I just sent to the Federal Reserve and send it to the Fed Governors:
Update: My article about the New Order was written without benefit of understanding of this quote from Quigley, which is truly a like-minded view to mine.
Originally, the European nations wanted a union of sorts, in order to prevent war. They convinced the United States and most western nations to go along with this new economic order. However, what started out as being benevolent became an abuse of power by the big international banks. It is my belief that this consolidation of bank powers by the richest nations, to make it easier to abuse mainstreet, was always the goal.
Basel 2 was supposed to be an accord that raised capital requirements, and that may one day still occur. But in 1998, under the nose of the BIS, the Basel 2 accord allowed low capital requirements along with the fraudulent off balance sheet banking. This fraud continued after Enron was destroyed by off balance sheet accounting, yet the bankers got bonuses for it! The power is in this banker cabal that is above the law.
We can peacefully fight this New World Order in our daily lives. But who do we fight? Well, not only are most Democrats for the NWO, so are most Republicans, including many who claim to support the Tea Party.
Feel free to copy this letter that I just sent to the Federal Reserve and send it to the Fed Governors:
My view is that Basel 2 in 1997 allowed off balance sheet banking. It seems as though this laid the groundwork for ponzi housing loans and easy money loans throughout the western world. I don't view this as a black swan, but rather a deliberate scam by the central banks. My question is, why does the BIS continually warn that all this excess was bad when the off balance sheet banking rules were permitted under the bank's watch? How can you prove to me that this bubble was not a scam, and a predetermined one at that? This is the sort of thing that makes one root for Greece to default and for the Euro to fail. There is a place for sovereign nations and regulation is that place. But the Fed refused to regulate homeless people getting multiple loans on real estate. What is with that? You can't ever live this down.Update: Here is the skinny on the prosecution of Ken Lewis by Andrew Cuomo. I suggest that Henry Paulson was telling the truth the first time when he said Bernanke told him to order Lewis to buy Merrill Lynch. My view is that these guys will do anything to protect the Fed Private Bank. But here is more info and the lawsuit in 1982 that forever uncovers the real nature of the Federal Reserve Bank. Is it funny divine humor that the name of the guy who brought the lawsuit that unknowingly uncovered the Fed was also named Lewis? That is funny if you think about it.
Update: My article about the New Order was written without benefit of understanding of this quote from Quigley, which is truly a like-minded view to mine.
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
Proof that the International Banking Cartel is Diabolical through Basel 3
- Can America Survive Asset Backed Securitization?
I recently wrote an article about the Basel 3 attempts to rev up securitization by putting taxpayers on the hook for permanent GSE loan guarantees. It is likely that this will happen and the effort to keep... - Part Three:Basel 3: Is This Taxation without Representation the Final Destruction of US Sovereignty?
Lets see what abuses could come from the Basel 3 effort to add GSE bonds to tier 2 capital requirements of the TBTF banks. Well, certainly, mortgages could be like treasury bonds. In times of crisis, the banks could go to the discount window, borrow
Financial Reform Will Come Up Short.
Update:
The financial reform passed by congress is weak. The TBTF banks are
almost certainly assured of their survival. Bank capital requirements
will be fairly easy, as the Fed seeks asset backed securitization to
take the place of mortgage backed securitization. We will see how bubble sparking this new plan to securitize ABS becomes.
Financial reform will reflect the will of the international banker cabal. Too big to fail will NOT END. Financial reform will likely not have a bank paid for fund. And financial reform will still have a lifeline to the treasury department. While there will be a fee charged to banks to share in the pain, the taxpayer of the United States is still on the hook if a TBTF bank threatens the financial system 10 years from now.The international banker cartel still has a choke hold on the sovereignty of the United States and all nations that have private central banks. While the new law will have a resolution trust authority, it is unlikely that the biggest banks will be subject to it since there is not a predefined rule for taking an insolvent TBTF bank down.
Synthetic CDO's which are really swaps, and a form of insurance that can be bet against, need to be banned from access to deposits. The Financial Reform Act will not have any protections for the deposits from CDO losses. This is criminal on the part of congress. CDO's do little to do anything but allow a framework for betting. There are 600 trillion dollars of those synthetic CDO's. The GDP of the US is 14 trillion per year.Synthetic CDO's require no ownership of underlying mortgages or bonds or anything. They failed and they hold the entire nation as hostage to the biggest financial institutions.
So nothing has changed with regard to the inability of the United States government to excercise sovereignty over the multinational banks and cut them down in bankruptcy. It is so incredible that both Democrats and Republicans are refusing to take on the banks. Face it politicians, the big banks own you and will threaten financial destruction if you don't humble yourselves before these dark overlords.
Readers, until the too big to fail banks are brought under the sovereign power of the United States government, it is necessary for you to save, spend less, park your car and put your wallets away. Teach your children and grandchildren as well because these big banks will do everything that they can to separate you from your money and deposit it with the wealthiest families of world finance.
Americans need to understand what has happened here. Investment banks took a gamble on housing and mortgages. They sold the crap bonds all over the world. They were all facing insolvency because of the downturn in the housing market and they threatened the US with financial destruction if the US didn't give Tarp money and zero interest loans to them.
We, as a nation,are no more than slaves to the international banking community. And our legislators have abdicated their responsibility to protect the American people. In a word, shameful. Banks will be too big to fail until America eventually repudiates all Republicans and Democrats as being legitimate defenders of the people.
If we add to this lack of power over international banks the lack of regulation of the ratings agencies, who claim that they are not interested in doing due diligence in discovery of financial weakness in a company, then the regular retail investors are naked and powerless to make accurate decisions about companies. But this is a continuing ongoing game on Wall Street. You have people like Maria Bartiromo of CNBC saying that booms and busts are just fine.
But with booms and busts controlled by the financial system's big players, the little guy will get killed in the market unless he is in and out like Flash Gordon.
I wrote below about the New World Order spoken of by Gordon Brown of GB. Well, he spoke right after the funding of the IMF by the G20. Never has the IMF tried to control first world countries. Until now. Greece is the guinea pig. It is imperative that the Greek populace resist this imposition of power by the IMF. If the IMF and the banking cartel has their way, there will be one treasury and one nationality in the Eurozone, further consolidating the power of the cabal!
Financial reform will reflect the will of the international banker cabal. Too big to fail will NOT END. Financial reform will likely not have a bank paid for fund. And financial reform will still have a lifeline to the treasury department. While there will be a fee charged to banks to share in the pain, the taxpayer of the United States is still on the hook if a TBTF bank threatens the financial system 10 years from now.The international banker cartel still has a choke hold on the sovereignty of the United States and all nations that have private central banks. While the new law will have a resolution trust authority, it is unlikely that the biggest banks will be subject to it since there is not a predefined rule for taking an insolvent TBTF bank down.
Synthetic CDO's which are really swaps, and a form of insurance that can be bet against, need to be banned from access to deposits. The Financial Reform Act will not have any protections for the deposits from CDO losses. This is criminal on the part of congress. CDO's do little to do anything but allow a framework for betting. There are 600 trillion dollars of those synthetic CDO's. The GDP of the US is 14 trillion per year.Synthetic CDO's require no ownership of underlying mortgages or bonds or anything. They failed and they hold the entire nation as hostage to the biggest financial institutions.
So nothing has changed with regard to the inability of the United States government to excercise sovereignty over the multinational banks and cut them down in bankruptcy. It is so incredible that both Democrats and Republicans are refusing to take on the banks. Face it politicians, the big banks own you and will threaten financial destruction if you don't humble yourselves before these dark overlords.
Readers, until the too big to fail banks are brought under the sovereign power of the United States government, it is necessary for you to save, spend less, park your car and put your wallets away. Teach your children and grandchildren as well because these big banks will do everything that they can to separate you from your money and deposit it with the wealthiest families of world finance.
Americans need to understand what has happened here. Investment banks took a gamble on housing and mortgages. They sold the crap bonds all over the world. They were all facing insolvency because of the downturn in the housing market and they threatened the US with financial destruction if the US didn't give Tarp money and zero interest loans to them.
Unless either:
1. these derivatives are made illegal for financial firms and financial firms cannot register by deceptive as other entities means to trade them (As Goldman may have done did in 1981) or
2. these banks face insolvency and breakup if their bets go wrong
then the international banks will still have a vice grip on American society and government.
We, as a nation,are no more than slaves to the international banking community. And our legislators have abdicated their responsibility to protect the American people. In a word, shameful. Banks will be too big to fail until America eventually repudiates all Republicans and Democrats as being legitimate defenders of the people.
If we add to this lack of power over international banks the lack of regulation of the ratings agencies, who claim that they are not interested in doing due diligence in discovery of financial weakness in a company, then the regular retail investors are naked and powerless to make accurate decisions about companies. But this is a continuing ongoing game on Wall Street. You have people like Maria Bartiromo of CNBC saying that booms and busts are just fine.
But with booms and busts controlled by the financial system's big players, the little guy will get killed in the market unless he is in and out like Flash Gordon.
I wrote below about the New World Order spoken of by Gordon Brown of GB. Well, he spoke right after the funding of the IMF by the G20. Never has the IMF tried to control first world countries. Until now. Greece is the guinea pig. It is imperative that the Greek populace resist this imposition of power by the IMF. If the IMF and the banking cartel has their way, there will be one treasury and one nationality in the Eurozone, further consolidating the power of the cabal!
Theories on How Goldman Sachs and Hedge Funds Fit Into the World Financial Picture.
- Investors Need to See Mainstreet Anger in the Light of Goldman Sachs Revelations
Before listing some great insightful quotes found on the Yahoo message board, I want to show you the essence of pitfalls facing Goldman Sachs. Jeff Nielson, a Seeking Alpha contributor, provided a link to... - Why Goldman Sachs Is Committing Treason
The Scoop Well, I guess the work that Goldman Sachs ceo Lloyd Blankfein called God's work wasn't God's work after all. Goldman Sachs has been charged with Securities Fraud for not... - Big Banks Are Stifling Economic Growth And Taxing Consumers
You can thank the Fed for that. - http://www.correntewire.com/fed_wont_allow_us_issue_currency
Immigration Law, Tea Party and the New World Order
The NWO has a lot to do with the way the US polices her borders. While
the Arizona law may prove to be too much for the police to handle
properly, it is a reflection of the Federal Government's failure to stop
illegal immigration. That does not mean that I personally would want to
live under such a law if I were a US Hispanic citizen. I would not want
to. I would fight the law if any abuse of it gets reported. Lets just hope the Federal Government gets the message and patrols
the border but understand that business and finance doesn't want a
closed border. In fact, big business wants a North American Zone similar
to the Eurozone.
I do not support the Tea Party and their philosophical roots that are set in the John Birch Society. While the Society believed in a New World Order, they were elitist, racist, and more concerned with paranoia and making war on communists and getting rid of your social security than about fascist bankers. The Tea Party is bankrolled by the Koch brothers and the John Birch Society was cofounded by their father, Fred Koch. This is why Ron Paul repudiated the Beck/Palin influence which is John Birch all the way.
I do not support the Tea Party and their philosophical roots that are set in the John Birch Society. While the Society believed in a New World Order, they were elitist, racist, and more concerned with paranoia and making war on communists and getting rid of your social security than about fascist bankers. The Tea Party is bankrolled by the Koch brothers and the John Birch Society was cofounded by their father, Fred Koch. This is why Ron Paul repudiated the Beck/Palin influence which is John Birch all the way.
Real Estate Defaults Have Many Innings to Go. Thanks New World Order! Note: The Defaults in 2010-2112 Includes Option Arms and We Now Know Many Prime Loans
Link to article: http://seekingalpha.com/article/170669-payments-shocks-boost-alt-a-subprime-rmbs-delinquencies
Update: New Basel 2 Revised Rules Loosen Capital Requirements for Banks
UPDATE: A quick statement came to CNBC on 5/26/10 stating that FASB
is looking at more mark to market again. Stockholders may want to check
this out. And there are headwinds relating to bringing the off
balance sheet crap back onto the books
of about 146 billion, without mark to market.
This is the new rule, banks will have more time to replenish their capital without having to comply with new capital requirements. They will just be zombies longer. It will be interesting to see if they ever lend again, knowing that they still have to meet these requirements FASB/BIS requirements at some time down the road. And it will be interesting to see if this event is more deflationary or less deflationary in the meantime. I think more deflationary.
With foreign sovereign wealth being rocked from Greece to Argentina and many more countries around the world, the relative less indebtedness of the US may work against some of these major, worldwide banks by causing the dollar to strengthen and the loans of the banks to cost more in a deflationary environment. Add to this the cost of banks fixing mortgages or owning massive amounts of defaulted homes, and we could have a significant deflationary event. The new capital requirements, when they come, will have a dampening effect upon what capital is worth as well. From the Reuters site:
Update: Our dark overlords, the private central banks, may be sacrificing Goldman Sachs, if proven, the worst offender using CDO's and Default Swap Insurance. The overlords want to save their skins, and perhaps are hoping that this small effort at justice will do so.
This is the new rule, banks will have more time to replenish their capital without having to comply with new capital requirements. They will just be zombies longer. It will be interesting to see if they ever lend again, knowing that they still have to meet these requirements FASB/BIS requirements at some time down the road. And it will be interesting to see if this event is more deflationary or less deflationary in the meantime. I think more deflationary.
With foreign sovereign wealth being rocked from Greece to Argentina and many more countries around the world, the relative less indebtedness of the US may work against some of these major, worldwide banks by causing the dollar to strengthen and the loans of the banks to cost more in a deflationary environment. Add to this the cost of banks fixing mortgages or owning massive amounts of defaulted homes, and we could have a significant deflationary event. The new capital requirements, when they come, will have a dampening effect upon what capital is worth as well. From the Reuters site:
"European bank shares rose 1.3 percent on relief that banks would have more time to adjust to new rules being drafted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, made up of central bankers and regulators from nearly 30 countries.Mini update: Note that the reprieve is not a done deal. There have been rumblings that the BIS may strictly enforce the 2012 date for implementation. As far as Dick Bove saying in the article that this would not be an issue for US banks, he is wrong. If real estate declines further with massive foreclosures from 2010 through 2013, then US banks could find themselves massively undercapitalized. And yet Bernanke has said that there need be no fractional banking reserves. Seems riskier than fractional banking itself!
The committee is expected to publish proposals this week for stricter financial regulations in response to the credit crisis. There had been fears that if banks implement the new rules quickly, they would have to raise substantial capital.
The three people with knowledge of the matter said the committee would stick to its plan to gradually implement changes starting in 2012, but will give banks a transition period to help them adjust to the rules.
Regulators do not plan to set a specific time frame for the transition period, said the sources who were not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. Japan's Nikkei newspaper said it would be at least 10 years.
The Basel II regulatory changes introduced in 2004 came with 10-year transition periods for some requirements."
Update: Our dark overlords, the private central banks, may be sacrificing Goldman Sachs, if proven, the worst offender using CDO's and Default Swap Insurance. The overlords want to save their skins, and perhaps are hoping that this small effort at justice will do so.
The Wolf at the Door
Robert
Wolf is the Wolf at the Door. He is on the Obama economic advisory
team. Of course, his bank, UBS, got 100 cents on the dollar bailout from
AIG that was funneled to many European and American banks. There are
other wolves, but his name fits the big picture her. This is such an
outrage, and is just one more proof that the Obama administration, like
the Bush administration before him, is being hijacked by the big banks.
It no longer is a risk to be a big bank. You just suck off the teat of
taxpayers and you will be fine.
(Update: the Volcker Plan has been announced, and could have the effect of insulating the FDIC deposits and therefore the taxpayers from the Wall Street investment bank casino that includes Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan investment bank, Citibank investment bank, Merrill Lynch of Bank of America and Morgan Stanley investment bank.)
UBS reportedly got 3 billion from the bailout, as Goldman Sachs led the way with 12 billion. Other big beneficiaries of the American taxpayers were Barkleys, Societe Generale, JP Morgan and many others. Jamie Dimon no doubt was in Obama's ear urging this bailout. I doubt if Obama even had a choice in the matter. He probably naively trusted the thieves of Wall Street.
I suggest that we either tax the banks, or preferably the trades of Wall Street to claw back money. I don't care if these international vermin paid back what they borrowed. They aren't paying back all the lost jobs, the losses of investors on the stock market, etc. They don't have trillions to make people whole. So I say, Obama, tax the trades of these vermin and do it NOW.
(Update: the Volcker Plan has been announced, and could have the effect of insulating the FDIC deposits and therefore the taxpayers from the Wall Street investment bank casino that includes Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan investment bank, Citibank investment bank, Merrill Lynch of Bank of America and Morgan Stanley investment bank.)
UBS reportedly got 3 billion from the bailout, as Goldman Sachs led the way with 12 billion. Other big beneficiaries of the American taxpayers were Barkleys, Societe Generale, JP Morgan and many others. Jamie Dimon no doubt was in Obama's ear urging this bailout. I doubt if Obama even had a choice in the matter. He probably naively trusted the thieves of Wall Street.
I suggest that we either tax the banks, or preferably the trades of Wall Street to claw back money. I don't care if these international vermin paid back what they borrowed. They aren't paying back all the lost jobs, the losses of investors on the stock market, etc. They don't have trillions to make people whole. So I say, Obama, tax the trades of these vermin and do it NOW.
Update: I Told You Capital Requirements Would Be Raised
I
have written here and on my other financial/government topics about the
need for the Bank of International Settlements to raise capital
requirements to prevent hyper inflation. This also has the benefit of
causing debt to languish on the books of countries, making the
international banking cartel richer and richer. In fact, the cartel
profited on off balance sheet ponzi housing scams with the help of lower
capital requirements, then on government bailouts, and now by scaring
the sheeple into more bond purchases as the government takes on more
debt burden coupled with the threats of higher capital requirements.
Seems that this yo yo of capital requirements is how the BIS controls
countries, debt levels, and stock markets.
From Bloomberg we have this assessement of bank capital requirements:
I would not mind the government and Fed scaring people into buying treasuries if the investment were fair. Actually, they would not have to scare people into bonds if there was a fair return. Besides the pure manipulation of this activity, the yields are terrible, and the savers and cautious people are being hurt by unfair low returns. It is important that savers be rewarded for savings and speculators who are pushing assets like oil up through the roof be chased from the markets. As it is the treasury bond costs are inflated, as in a bubble, while yields or interest remain ridiculously low. Bill Gross, the bond expert at PIMCO has said that the value of all assets in the USA are overpriced by 15 TRILLION dollars!
Here is what is happening. The speculators, due to this continual reflation by the Fed, are driving up the prices of all commodities and artificially raising the standard of living for all of us. The average guy cannot afford this continual rise in prices. The Fed is going to have to defend the dollar because the Achilles Heel of their reflation policy is asset inflation. I have spoken about that asset bubble forming here.
One of these days the government is going to have to defend the dollar, or we will have 5 dollar gas. The Fed needs to pop asset bubbles to protect average Joe American. They cannot keep pumping up this economy artificially if it results in a massive rise in commodity prices. That will kill the recovery anyway. The Fed is stretching the rubber band and the consumer will break if this reflation behavior continues.
If you read on you will see that I don't believe this reflation of assets can continue much longer.
From Bloomberg we have this assessement of bank capital requirements:
"The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, a 35-year-old panel that sets international capital guidelines, plans to propose a “new minimum global liquidity standard” by the end of this year, according to a Sept. 15 statement from the Financial Stability Board, which is coordinating financial regulatory reform on behalf of the Group of 20 nations."The effect of this minimum global liquidity standard is to protect the bank bondholders, the rich folks who through hedge funds lever up these bonds for an almost guaranteed juicy return. So much for free market capitalism and risk. The rich take virtually no risk in this New World Order.
I would not mind the government and Fed scaring people into buying treasuries if the investment were fair. Actually, they would not have to scare people into bonds if there was a fair return. Besides the pure manipulation of this activity, the yields are terrible, and the savers and cautious people are being hurt by unfair low returns. It is important that savers be rewarded for savings and speculators who are pushing assets like oil up through the roof be chased from the markets. As it is the treasury bond costs are inflated, as in a bubble, while yields or interest remain ridiculously low. Bill Gross, the bond expert at PIMCO has said that the value of all assets in the USA are overpriced by 15 TRILLION dollars!
Here is what is happening. The speculators, due to this continual reflation by the Fed, are driving up the prices of all commodities and artificially raising the standard of living for all of us. The average guy cannot afford this continual rise in prices. The Fed is going to have to defend the dollar because the Achilles Heel of their reflation policy is asset inflation. I have spoken about that asset bubble forming here.
One of these days the government is going to have to defend the dollar, or we will have 5 dollar gas. The Fed needs to pop asset bubbles to protect average Joe American. They cannot keep pumping up this economy artificially if it results in a massive rise in commodity prices. That will kill the recovery anyway. The Fed is stretching the rubber band and the consumer will break if this reflation behavior continues.
If you read on you will see that I don't believe this reflation of assets can continue much longer.
The Crash Will Come. International Bankers are Raping America.
Are We Facing Inflation or Deflation? I Say the Latter
We
are facing deflation folks, thanks to the New World Economic Order.
Inflation is a head fake. If FASB plans are implemented, the Mark to
Market, or M2M rule, will be reimposed on the banks, causing the economy
to tank and the stock market to crash. This time there may be no fake
inflation play to create another bubble.
FASB is an accounting arm of the Bank of International Settlements. Just be aware that the desire to trim back the banks and ring speculation out of the markets is not complete. Just as banks in Japan were saddled with greater reserve requirements, right when they needed to bring Japan out of a deflationary spiral, so will the banks in the USA be saddled with Mark to Market once again or at least much higher collateral requirements. M2M was lifted, causing the March 2009 stock rally. It is about to be imposed again or higher collateral will slow economies down.
FASB is an accounting arm of the Bank of International Settlements. Just be aware that the desire to trim back the banks and ring speculation out of the markets is not complete. Just as banks in Japan were saddled with greater reserve requirements, right when they needed to bring Japan out of a deflationary spiral, so will the banks in the USA be saddled with Mark to Market once again or at least much higher collateral requirements. M2M was lifted, causing the March 2009 stock rally. It is about to be imposed again or higher collateral will slow economies down.
Has Heli Ben Lost His Nerve?
Update:In
the 1970's, we inflated and it didn't kill the economy. America was not
a debtor nation in the 1970's. But all that has changed. We owe foreign
governments a lot of money, as they have purchased large amounts of our
treasury bonds. The have a vested interest in America's continuing
responsibility to keep the dollar strong. As I have discussed in Deflation Threat
the Federal Reserve Bank is boxed in. On the one hand, the strong
dollar will continue a deflationary slide, and cause the banks to be
stuck with toxic debt, unable to inflate their way out of that debt.
On the other hand, the risk of inflation will bring high interest rates on property that is already too expensive and not yet deflated. That risk will hurt the value of treasury bonds and put the USA at risk of credit rating decline. That will raise borrowing for all of us. So, the Fed is in a box, and who knows how it will work out. Ben Bernanke is a student of the Great Depression, and he certainly would like to inflate. Housing and the Chinese make that very difficult to do.
Could we have another Great Depression? Possibly. Could we have 10 to 15 years of deflation and little demand for money and loans? Quite probably. Hunker down and save your dollars as they may get more valuable as time goes on. If Bernanke is replaced at any time the fed may get reckless. But as of now they are not prone to do so under Bernanke.
Right now the stock market has no relation to the real economy. It is being driven up artificially by the program trades of Goldman Sachs and the hedge funds that ride the investment bank's coattails. Be careful with stocks!
On the other hand, the risk of inflation will bring high interest rates on property that is already too expensive and not yet deflated. That risk will hurt the value of treasury bonds and put the USA at risk of credit rating decline. That will raise borrowing for all of us. So, the Fed is in a box, and who knows how it will work out. Ben Bernanke is a student of the Great Depression, and he certainly would like to inflate. Housing and the Chinese make that very difficult to do.
Could we have another Great Depression? Possibly. Could we have 10 to 15 years of deflation and little demand for money and loans? Quite probably. Hunker down and save your dollars as they may get more valuable as time goes on. If Bernanke is replaced at any time the fed may get reckless. But as of now they are not prone to do so under Bernanke.
Right now the stock market has no relation to the real economy. It is being driven up artificially by the program trades of Goldman Sachs and the hedge funds that ride the investment bank's coattails. Be careful with stocks!
The Abuse by International Bankers
Update:
The federal Reserve received a Subpoena from Congress today. The fed
did not give up freely information proving that Bernanke ordered Paulson
to instruct Ken Lewis of Bank of America to purchase Wachovia. Lewis
was threatened with his job and he testified to that effect. The Federal
Reserve is a collection of twelve PRIVATELY held banks who lend money
to the United States. They may or may not own more of the debt of the
United States than does China. They are raping the United States by
conflicts of interest. and Obama needs to do what Andrew Jackson did,
chase out this private bank and issue currency free from debt.
In 2009, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the fed, though an agent of the United States government,is actually owned by private interests. The court said that the local banks each own the fed banks in their area. If that is the case, the New York Fed, which is the most infuential fed, is owned by JP Morgan, mostly. That is a huge conflict of interest, and of course, JP Morgan the man established the Fed in 1913 as a representative of the Rothchilds, the premier European central bank owners. So, though once removed, it could be that the Rothchilds actually control the New York fed without direct ownership!
America has lost her sovereignty to this cabal of international bankers, the Federal Reserve being the facilitator of this system in the United States. America is going to be impoverished in debt because of this cabal. President Obama has shown so far that he is no Andrew Jackson, as he allows this system to increase the debt of the United States. This cabal, through the Fed, controls the money supply and makes agreements with international banks without congressional oversight.
Update: On CNBC with Maria Bartiromo, Dr Robert Mundell has recommended replacing the dollar with a world wide currency controlled by the international monetary community. Seems there are a lot of professors in the hip pockets of the international monetary community. Dr Mundell, why don't you tell us what the dangers are of this development in the comment box on this website? Why aren't you concerned about freedom and economic independence? Don't you care that the American Revolution was fought to rid our country of Bank of England oppression? We are on the brink of having complete control placed upon us by the Money Changers of the world.
Recently, this one world powerful economic system has committed a verifiable fraud upon the middle classes in many corners of the world, but mainly in the United States. As the United States failed to increase the standard of living in the last 20 years, the bankers saw an opportunity to offer lots of credit to consumers. Because Americans have a much higher level of consumer spending related to GDP, at 70 percent, and this GDP is the biggest in the world, then this middle class had the power to make or break economies the world over.
Give this middle class easy credit because wages have not improved, and you can maintain the spending, and maintain a world economy based upon that spending. But this credit offered was a fraud committed against the unsuspecting American public through the Basel II agreement. This agreement allowed the banks to keep risky investments hidden off their balance sheets. This fraud allowed the banks to offer easy credit, liar loans, alt a loans, option arms, subprime and other easy credit. Repeal of Glass-Steagall opened up the floodgates of recklessness.
This toxic debt was then packaged up and sold to unsuspecting investors the world over and to our pension funds, county governments and even school districts, and upon the bond packages were piled derivative insurance betting against or for the success of the bonds. So then, if a bond was worth a dollar, as an example, the derivative risk of failure of that bond was leveraged 10 to 1. Massive losses occurred for these investors.
The fraud that was put upon the borrowers in the United States was put upon the investors who bought the bonds and the derivatives. Many of these markets have frozen up, and now there are no markets and these assets are very difficult to value.
And guess what folks! Because all this economic voodoo failed, you the taxpayer have to bail out the banks who made all the money before they failed. The taxpayer will pay trillions of dollars to try, and maybe not succeed, to fix this broken fraud system. If this one world fraud doesn't upset any of you, then I guess we don't know what will.
There are links below that show how the one world government works. I would hope that you bookmark this site for a reference to these links. When you read these benign articles about international bankers you need to keep in mind the fraud that they have delivered to the American people. You will see these scumbag bankers in a very different light.
This is an important quote and research from a link below:
In 2009, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the fed, though an agent of the United States government,is actually owned by private interests. The court said that the local banks each own the fed banks in their area. If that is the case, the New York Fed, which is the most infuential fed, is owned by JP Morgan, mostly. That is a huge conflict of interest, and of course, JP Morgan the man established the Fed in 1913 as a representative of the Rothchilds, the premier European central bank owners. So, though once removed, it could be that the Rothchilds actually control the New York fed without direct ownership!
America has lost her sovereignty to this cabal of international bankers, the Federal Reserve being the facilitator of this system in the United States. America is going to be impoverished in debt because of this cabal. President Obama has shown so far that he is no Andrew Jackson, as he allows this system to increase the debt of the United States. This cabal, through the Fed, controls the money supply and makes agreements with international banks without congressional oversight.
Update: On CNBC with Maria Bartiromo, Dr Robert Mundell has recommended replacing the dollar with a world wide currency controlled by the international monetary community. Seems there are a lot of professors in the hip pockets of the international monetary community. Dr Mundell, why don't you tell us what the dangers are of this development in the comment box on this website? Why aren't you concerned about freedom and economic independence? Don't you care that the American Revolution was fought to rid our country of Bank of England oppression? We are on the brink of having complete control placed upon us by the Money Changers of the world.
Recently, this one world powerful economic system has committed a verifiable fraud upon the middle classes in many corners of the world, but mainly in the United States. As the United States failed to increase the standard of living in the last 20 years, the bankers saw an opportunity to offer lots of credit to consumers. Because Americans have a much higher level of consumer spending related to GDP, at 70 percent, and this GDP is the biggest in the world, then this middle class had the power to make or break economies the world over.
Give this middle class easy credit because wages have not improved, and you can maintain the spending, and maintain a world economy based upon that spending. But this credit offered was a fraud committed against the unsuspecting American public through the Basel II agreement. This agreement allowed the banks to keep risky investments hidden off their balance sheets. This fraud allowed the banks to offer easy credit, liar loans, alt a loans, option arms, subprime and other easy credit. Repeal of Glass-Steagall opened up the floodgates of recklessness.
This toxic debt was then packaged up and sold to unsuspecting investors the world over and to our pension funds, county governments and even school districts, and upon the bond packages were piled derivative insurance betting against or for the success of the bonds. So then, if a bond was worth a dollar, as an example, the derivative risk of failure of that bond was leveraged 10 to 1. Massive losses occurred for these investors.
The fraud that was put upon the borrowers in the United States was put upon the investors who bought the bonds and the derivatives. Many of these markets have frozen up, and now there are no markets and these assets are very difficult to value.
And guess what folks! Because all this economic voodoo failed, you the taxpayer have to bail out the banks who made all the money before they failed. The taxpayer will pay trillions of dollars to try, and maybe not succeed, to fix this broken fraud system. If this one world fraud doesn't upset any of you, then I guess we don't know what will.
There are links below that show how the one world government works. I would hope that you bookmark this site for a reference to these links. When you read these benign articles about international bankers you need to keep in mind the fraud that they have delivered to the American people. You will see these scumbag bankers in a very different light.
This is an important quote and research from a link below:
{The tsunami of credit that burst onto the scene after this “Basle Accord” helped save America from a recession, enabled it to fund a war, sleep walked Europeans, politically into the Euro Zone and attempted to copper fasten the artificial state called the European Union. This crisis is no accident it was premeditated and internationally agreed upon.
If you don’t believe the pre-meditation involved please read the quote below from the Wall Street Journal, Nov. 27th. 2007:
“In 1998 the Basle Accord created the opportunity for regulatory arbitrage whereby banks could shift loans off their balance sheets. A new capital discipline that was designed to “improve” risk management led to a PARALLEL BANKING SYSTEM whose lack of transparency explains how the market started to seize up.
The “originate-to-distribute” model REDUCED THE INCENTIVE for banks to monitor the CREDIT QUALITY of the loans they pumped into...}
Was Dylan Ratigan a Victim of the New World Order?
Dylan Ratigan attempted to expose the theft by the big banks of the
treasury of the United States. He resigned, but was it forced? Many
think so. http://cnbc.com
We Already Have One World Government
Update: on 4/2/2009 British Prime Minister Gordon Brown proclaimed a "New World Order".
Let's consider the consequences of this new world order. Clearly, the
international bankers created this credit crisis, with their Basel 2 off
balance sheet banking. Now the same international bankers
are "solving" the crisis with more extension of credit in their power,
bolstered by the IMF, with more efforts to manipulate the stock markets,
to proclaim a comeback from the economic abyss, that they created. The
problem with this is that they are still raiding the treasuries of
America and Europe to fill their pockets, when they scammed the middle
classes and small investors throughout the world with liar loans, easy
money, and toxic investments. They made money on the scam and now they
are making money through stealing from the taxpayers!
While it is not a tidy one world political government, we have, or are very near having, a one world economic system. International bankers control the world. This control will increase as other middle classes become more dependent on credit. If a person from a third world country thinks that credit cards are a good thing or long for the credit freedom that exists in the United States, don't go down that path. Don't become dependent on credit cards. Fight the international bankers, the World Trade Organization and stay solvent as a household.
Certainly do not bid on housing, do not bid on any commodity. If the price is too high go without. Rent the commodity, or use a different commodity. The pushing up of prices ultimately hurt the consumer who sees his wages stagnate. The goal of the international bankers (through the Council on Foreign Relations in the USA) is the debt control both of individuals and governments. This is a New World Order spoken of by both David Rockefeller and George Bush I.
Don't you think it odd that Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton are both members of the same organization (CFR) that wants to undermine the sovereignty of the United States by consolidating banking power through international banks too big to fail? Certainly the point man in this war against the consumer by the banker class is Goldman Sachs. I hope you are able to take a peek at this condemnation of this very badly behaving company.
How did this one world government come to pass?
Leading wealthy families have wanted to stabilize a dangerous world. While in and of itself, that seems like a noble endeavor, the result has also included a powerhouse of economic power that has leverage over governments the world over. This leverage normally was exerted by a financing of government debt. This gave international bankers great influence over governments. But also governments benefited from the free trade, although there are arguments abounding that the United States did not benefit. Some have said that our invasion of Iraq for oil was an invasion born out of economic weakness.
But bottom line is this world government, which many put their hope in to establish world peace, behaved badly toward US consumers and offered toxic loans that were just plain wrong. I am sure George Soros wants peace, and wants a government that usurps the sovereignty from individual nations that have the power to make war. However, Mr. Soros must also be aware that this one world government is quite capable of stealing from the people and has not proven that it is for "good" in the world. So far, this NWO has manifested very bad behavior towards the people of the United States and Europe.
While it is not a tidy one world political government, we have, or are very near having, a one world economic system. International bankers control the world. This control will increase as other middle classes become more dependent on credit. If a person from a third world country thinks that credit cards are a good thing or long for the credit freedom that exists in the United States, don't go down that path. Don't become dependent on credit cards. Fight the international bankers, the World Trade Organization and stay solvent as a household.
Certainly do not bid on housing, do not bid on any commodity. If the price is too high go without. Rent the commodity, or use a different commodity. The pushing up of prices ultimately hurt the consumer who sees his wages stagnate. The goal of the international bankers (through the Council on Foreign Relations in the USA) is the debt control both of individuals and governments. This is a New World Order spoken of by both David Rockefeller and George Bush I.
Don't you think it odd that Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton are both members of the same organization (CFR) that wants to undermine the sovereignty of the United States by consolidating banking power through international banks too big to fail? Certainly the point man in this war against the consumer by the banker class is Goldman Sachs. I hope you are able to take a peek at this condemnation of this very badly behaving company.
How did this one world government come to pass?
Leading wealthy families have wanted to stabilize a dangerous world. While in and of itself, that seems like a noble endeavor, the result has also included a powerhouse of economic power that has leverage over governments the world over. This leverage normally was exerted by a financing of government debt. This gave international bankers great influence over governments. But also governments benefited from the free trade, although there are arguments abounding that the United States did not benefit. Some have said that our invasion of Iraq for oil was an invasion born out of economic weakness.
But bottom line is this world government, which many put their hope in to establish world peace, behaved badly toward US consumers and offered toxic loans that were just plain wrong. I am sure George Soros wants peace, and wants a government that usurps the sovereignty from individual nations that have the power to make war. However, Mr. Soros must also be aware that this one world government is quite capable of stealing from the people and has not proven that it is for "good" in the world. So far, this NWO has manifested very bad behavior towards the people of the United States and Europe.
One World Economics and Politics on Amazon
  |
Amazon Price: $13.00
List Price: $16.95 |
  |
Amazon Price: $8.09
List Price: $15.99 |
  |
Amazon Price: $22.51
List Price: $5.99 |
  |
Amazon Price: $31.38
List Price: $39.45 |
  |
Amazon Price: $16.98
List Price: $29.95 |
  |
Amazon Price: $24.95
List Price: $28.95 |
  |
Amazon Price: $29.85
List Price: $10.99 |
  |
Amazon Price: $8.99
|
Crucial New World Order and Banking Links
- The American Public Is Incredibly Stupid About Walking Away from Debt and Underwater Mortgages
There is no hope of financial literacy for the American public if one is to believe the astounding poll taken by Fannie Mae. The poll found that most Americans believe that it was the borrowers fault, not the... - Corresponding with Ellen Brown on Sovereignty, Dollar Creation and the Fallacy of Keeping a Private
I have been corresponding with Ellen Brown, who has some great ideas for solving the economic problems we have today. I argued that we need to nationalize the central bank in Why Limited Government Types Are... - Tea Party Republicans: I Wish I Could Believe You When You Say You Want to Cut the Lifeline to the B
Being an independent voter, I have no skin in the game regarding Republicans versus Democrats with regard to the credit meltdown. Both parties clearly were involved in allowing the Ponzi housing loans to... - Will The US Declare Independence from the Federal Reserve
What Americans need to realize was that Ben Bernanke prevented an economic meltdown caused by the Fed itself! The Fed private bank allowed off balance shadow banking approved by Basel 2 to come to the... - Who Rules America: Wealth, Income, and Power
This document presents details on the wealth and income distributions in the United States, and explains how we use these two distributions as power indicators. Some of the information might be a surprise to many people. The most amazing numbers on - Bancor: The Name Of The Global Currency That A Shocking IMF Report Is Proposing
Sometimes there are things that are so shocking that you just do not want to report them unless they can be completely and totally documented. Over the past - The\'re Building a Box: Chapter 2: Banketeering: The Money Supply Scam
Governments should have the power to print money, not banks at interest. - Stopping the Housing Spiral Is Another Government Scam. Boycott Housing. Boycott Trusting Wall Stree
I have talked to many young folks who want to buy a home. But the housing market is not adjusting so that they can afford to buy their first home. Investors are competing and are spending cash. But the fact... - The Real Revolution is Fighting Asset Inflation
Be sure to take the frugality poll down the page. I want to know over time how people are thinking about thrift and spending. Americans must use their brains in order to defeat the banksters who have... - Schumer Sucks
Chuck Schumer has essentially allowed the Federal Reserve Bank, a private bank, to take in very crappy loans and toxic assets from the banks and allow them to have treasury bonds in return. The taxpayer, not... - Overview: Netting and Insolvency
This article proves Bernanke lied when he said that the Fed could not nationalize a multinational bank like BAC, JPM, WFC or C. The Fed had the power to take the assets, sell them off, and put a clean bank back onto the market which it did not do. - Web of Debt - BIG BROTHER IN BASEL: BIS FINANCIAL STABILITY BOARD UNDERMINES NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY
BIG BROTHER IN BASEL: BIS FINANCIAL STABILITY BOARD UNDERMINES NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling
The Federal Reserve Banks are private. They are owned by the local banks in their area. - The Federal Reserve is a Private Corporation
Questions?? prison federal reserve corporation. treason Law-International - Pope Goes Against God. Wants New Financial World Order
Pope Goes Against God. Wants New Financial World Order in the HubPages Religion Forum - Important Video about Foreign Banks and US Presidents.
This is a very disturbing but revealing video about foreign banks and US presidents who have been killed and nearly killed opposing private national banks. - Excess Reserves Go Berserk As Lending Flatlines Manhattan Real Estate: New York City Real Estate T
What I want to know is what will Geithner and Summers do if these banks burn through this 800 billion reserve and still have toxics? They aren't lending now. This could be very Japan-like where deflation rules. Watch this chart at the Fed website. - Be Patriotic Stop International Bankers From Raping America
I don't really know if international bankers have always been cockroaches. But certainly after Basil II they have been pests that need to be stamped out. Now I don't believe in just killing them, unless the... - One World Central Bank
This dangerous website is a clear call for a bank that overrides government sovereignty. These well placed professors are pushing the New World Order with uncommon brazenness. - New World Economist Afraid of Speculative Attack on Bank Credit
Must read link showing the possibility of a chink in the New World Order financial system. - Our Great Polticians Warned Us But Couldn't Save Us From the Moneychangers
History of debate against the moneychangers is here in a concise format. - British Prime Minister Announced New World Order. Anyone Catch That?
British Prime Minister Announced New World Order. Anyone Catch That? in the HubPages Finance Forum - international bankers Beyond Money
Link to Quote above. This is very important reading. - Boycott Citibank and the Banks
Now is the time for the citizens of the United States to take our country back. Now is the time to act so that the central bankers will never again mess around with, or take advantage of, the citizens of the... - History of International Banking
Good brief description of international banking history. - Hoover Institution - Comments, Essays, and Speeches - China vs. Russia: International Bankers Run a
Who would imagine international bankers running a natural experiment for us, free of charge? And yet, they did, in the mid-2000s in China and Russia. - The federal reserve wants a North American Union
The federal reserve wants a North American Union in the HubPages Politics Forum - Patrick Wood -- International Bankers Invading China?
Interesting article about China and bankers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)