Financed by American Tax Dollars, the OECD Endorses Obama’s Statist Agenda for the U.S. Economy
September 3, 2014 by
Dan Mitchell
I hate to sound like a broken record, but the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is once again pushing for
bigger and more intrusive in the United States. The international
bureaucracy’s “
Economic Survey” of the United States reads like it was produced by some interns at the Democratic National Committee.
Since the OECD is based in Paris, I suppose it’s not very surprising
that it has a statist agenda. But it’s still offensive because
American taxpayers finance the biggest portion of the bureaucracy’s budget.
In other words, I’m subsidizing the people who are interfering with
America’s domestic policy in hopes of making America more like France!
Moreover, the OECD’s transformation into a pro-statism organization is disappointing since, as
I wrote back in 2011
when reviewing some academic analysis of the organization’s left-wing
drift, “the OECD initially was designed to be a relatively innocuous
bureaucracy that focused on statistics. Indeed, it was even viewed as a
free-market counterpart to the Soviet Bloc’s Council for Mutual Economic
Assistance.”
Yet today, the OECD behaves as if the West lost the Cold War.
But enough complaining on my part. Let’s look at what the OECD recommended in its
Economic Survey.
We’ll start with the (sort of) good news. The bureaucrats actually
recognize that America’s economy is suffering from a very anemic
recovery and expansion (some of us have been
making this point for years).
Here are a couple of charts from the report looking at economic
output and employment. As you can see, even bureaucrats from Paris
acknowledge that Obamanomics has generated dismal results.
Here’s the chart looking at GDP.
And here’s the chart looking at employment.
So did the bureaucrats look at these grim numbers and conclude that bigger government isn’t working?
Nope. They basically suggested that America should double down on statism.
I’m not joking. Here are some of the specific suggestions from the report.
The OECD suggested that the United States
should “Cut the marginal corporate income statutory tax rate.” You might
think that’s a pro-growth recommendation, but the bureaucracy
simultaneously recommended that politicians “broaden the tax base,
notably by phasing out tax allowances” and also advised them to “take
measures to prevent base erosion and profit shifting.” In other words,
the OECD embraced
Obama’s rearrange-the-deck-chairs-on-the-Titanic proposal.
The OECD urged that politicians “Make the
personal tax system more redistributive.” This is an astounding proposal
given that the United States already
has the most “progressive” tax system
of all developed nations (primarily because we have much lower taxes on
poor and middle-income taxpayers). The only silver lining to this black
cloud is that the OECD wants to further penalize the rich “by
restricting regressive income tax expenditures” rather than by raising
tax rates. Maybe Francois Hollande gave them
some advice on being merciful?
The OECD is a big fan of redistribution,
so it’s not surprising to read that the bureaucracy suggests “expanding
the ETIC,” regardless of
all the fraud.
But I confess that I’m surprised that the organization also endorsed “a
higher minimum wage.” I understand that the organization see its role
as being supportive of Obama, but you would think that the economists at
the OECD would have enough self respect and human decency to block
a proposal to harm poor people.
The OECD not only wants to make it hard
for low-skilled people to get jobs, it also wants to encourage
discrimination against younger women. At least that’s the only logical
conclusion after reading that the bureaucrats embraced the White House’s
scheme for “paid family leave nationally.” As you might imagine,
businesses
respond to incentives
and will be less likely to higher women of childbearing age if the law
makes them liable for paying workers who aren’t on the job.
The OECD unsurprisingly reiterates its
support for Obama’s global-warming agenda, suggesting that U.S.
politicians should be “putting a price on greenhouse gas emissions.”
Translated from jargon, this would mean a big tax on energy consumption.
And speaking of energy taxes, the bureaucrats also say that government
in America should be “capturing some of the resource rent” of energy
production. That’s another jargon-laden way of saying that politicians
should make it more expensive for people to drive their cars and heat
their homes (makes you wonder if they
hacked the IMF computers to come up with those bad ideas).
The OECD also thinks the federal
government should be more involved in raising kids. The report
recommends “Expanding effective targeted interventions – such as Head
Start, Early Head Start.” Apparently we’re supposed to applaud good
intentions and ignore the fact that
even government-sponsored research finds that these programs don’t benefit kids.
There are more bad policies, but this is getting repetitive, so let’s close with some additional charts from the report.
I think you’ll agree that the selection of material and the
presentation of the charts (particularly the headings) make it obvious
that the OECD is endorsing more statism.
After all, nobody likes their country to be “low” when compared to other nations.
And who want to have “fallen behind”?
And if “fallen behind” is bad, then “lags behind” may be even worse!
Sigh. In every case, the clear implication is that government should spend more and intervene more.
Gee, I guess I’m supposed to be embarrassed that the United States is
“behind” all the wonderful and socially conscious European nations.
Except we’re not behind, at least when it comes to the data that really matter. Just click
here,
here, and
here before deciding whether Americans should listen to the OECD and copy Europe’s welfare states.
P.S. Don’t forget that the OECD’s misguided analysis and recommendations were developed with
your tax dollars. Sort of makes you wonder why GOPers
don’t eliminate the handouts that facilitate such nonsense.
P.P.S. Just in case you wonder whether this report is an anomaly, here are a few other examples of OECD work.
*It has
allied itself with the nutjobs from the so-called Occupy movement to push for bigger government and higher taxes in the United States.
*The bureaucrats are
advocating higher business tax burdens, which would aggravate America’s competitive disadvantage.
*The OECD is pushing a “
Multilateral Convention” that is designed to become something akin to a World Tax Organization, with the power to
persecute nations with free-market tax policy.
*It
supports Obama’s class-warfare agenda, publishing documents endorsing “higher marginal tax rates” so that the so-called rich “contribute their fair share.”
*The OECD
advocates the value-added tax based on the absurd notion that increasing the burden of government is good for growth and employment.
*It even
concocts dishonest poverty numbers to advocate more redistribution in the United States.
Share this:
