Thursday, October 23, 2014

WATCH: Obama Throws Democrat Candidates Under the Bus AGAIN and You Can Almost Smell the Rubber Burning

Obama.Bus
Democrat Senate candidates have been more than distancing themselves from Barack Obama to get elected or re-elected. They’ve literally ran from him, refusing even to be seen with him.

When Obama recently said, “Make no mistake, my policies are on the ballot this fall,” only weeks ago, you could see almost see the tire tracks and smell the burned rubber from the Democrat candidates he just threw under his over-used bus.

Even his savagely loyal former longtime adviser and fellow Marxist, David Axelrod, called the remarks a “mistake,” while Charles Krauthammer said that Obama’s saying it could lead to a “shellacking” for Democrats this fall.

One would think, especially after being criticized so harshly, even from those in his own Democrat Party, that Obama had learned his lesson.

Nope, he’s done it again, and this time, it might even be worse for those Democrats, who while voting with Obama, typically over 95% of the time, are attempting to paint themselves as ruggedly independent and not a “rubber stamp” for his policies, as Republicans are campaigning heavily on.

Watch this short one minute clip from an interview Obama gave to sycophantic follower and professional race hustler, MSNBC’s Al Sharpton on Monday, in which he tells Sharpton that while these Democrats may be running from him and his policies, they are in-fact extremely loyal Obama robots who will rarely if ever vote against his tyrannical policies or push-back against his unconstitutional and dictatorial royal edicts.

“The bottom line is though, these are all folks who vote with me, they have supported my agenda in Congress,” Obama told Sharpton, blowing a lid off of Democrat candidates’ cover.

“These are folks who are strong allies and supporters of me,” Obama argued, a strong contradiction of Democrats trying to distance themselves from him. “This isn’t about my feelings being hurt,” he contended.

Oops!

Republicans were just given a big, fast pitch, thrown under-handed, right down the middle of the plate by Obama.

WATCH BELOW:



Please share this on Facebook and Twitter if you’re starting to wonder whether Obama even wants Democrats to win in November.

Text of the Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act of 2012

Text of the Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act of 2012

This bill was enacted after being signed by the President on December 28, 2012. The text of the bill below is as of Dec 19, 2012 (Passed Congress/Enrolled Bill).
Source: GPO
One Hundred Twelfth Congress of the United States of America
At the Second Session
H. R. 3783
AN ACT
To provide for a comprehensive strategy to counter Iran’s growing hostile presence and activity in the Western Hemisphere, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act of 2012.
2.
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
The United States has vital political, economic, and security interests in the Western Hemisphere.
(2)
Iran is pursuing cooperation with Latin American countries by signing economic and security agreements in order to create a network of diplomatic and economic relationships to lessen the blow of international sanctions and oppose Western attempts to constrict its ambitions.
(3)
According to the Department of State, Hezbollah, with Iran as its state sponsor, is considered the most technically capable terrorist group in the world with thousands of supporters, several thousand members, and a few hundred terrorist operatives, and officials from the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Qods Force have been working in concert with Hezbollah for many years.
(4)
The IRGC’s Qods Force has a long history of supporting Hezbollah’s military, paramilitary, and terrorist activities, providing it with guidance, funding, weapons, intelligence, and logistical support, and in 2007, the Department of the Treasury placed sanctions on the IRGC and its Qods Force for their support of terrorism and proliferation activities.
(5)
The IRGC’s Qods Force stations operatives in foreign embassies, charities, and religious and cultural institutions to foster relationships, often building on existing socioeconomic ties with the well established Shia Diaspora, and recent years have witnessed an increased presence in Latin America.
(6)
According to the Department of Defense, the IRGC and its Qods Force played a significant role in some of the deadliest terrorist attacks of the past two decades, including the 1994 attack on the AMIA Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires, by generally directing or supporting the groups that actually executed the attacks.
(7)
Reports of Iranian intelligence agents being implicated in Hezbollah-linked activities since the early 1990s suggest direct Iranian government support of Hezbollah activities in the Tri-Border Area of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay, and in the past decade, Iran has dramatically increased its diplomatic missions to Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Argentina, and Brazil. Iran has built 17 cultural centers in Latin America, and it currently maintains 11 embassies, up from 6 in 2005.
(8)
Hezbollah and other Iranian proxies with a presence in Latin America have raised revenues through illicit activities, including drug and arms trafficking, counterfeiting, money laundering, forging travel documents, pirating software and music, and providing haven and assistance to other terrorists transiting the region.
(9)
Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, Nicaragua, and Venezuela expressed their intention to assist Iran in evading sanctions by signing a statement supporting Iran’s nuclear activities and announcing at a 2010 joint press conference in Tehran their determination to continue and expand their economic ties to Iran with confidence that Iran can give a crushing response to the threats and sanctions imposed by the West and imperialism.
(10)
The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration concluded in 2008 that almost one-half of the foreign terrorist organizations in the world are linked to narcotics trade and trafficking, including Hezbollah and Hamas.
(11)
In October 2011, the United States charged two men, Manssor Arbabsiar, a United States citizen holding both Iranian and United States passports, and Gholam Shakuri, an Iran-based member of Iran’s IRGC Qods Force, with conspiracy to murder a foreign official using explosives in an act of terrorism. Arbabsiar traveled to Mexico with the express intent to hire someone in the narcotics business to carry out the assassination of the Saudi Arabian Ambassador in the United States. While in the end, he only engaged a U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency informant posing as an associate of a drug trafficking cartel, Arbabsiar believed that he was working with a member of a Mexican drug trafficking organization and sought to send money to this individual in installments and not in a single transfer.
(12)
In February 2011, actions by the Department of the Treasury effectively shut down the Lebanese Canadian Bank. Subsequent actions by the United States Government in connection with the investigation into Lebanese Canadian Bank resulted in the indictment in December 2011 of Ayman Joumaa, an individual of Lebanese nationality, with citizenship in Lebanon and Colombia, and with ties to Hezbollah, for trafficking cocaine to the Los Zetas drug trafficking organization in Mexico City for sale in the United States and for laundering the proceeds.
3.
Statement of Policy
It shall be the policy of the United States to use a comprehensive government-wide strategy to counter Iran’s growing hostile presence and activity in the Western Hemisphere by working together with United States allies and partners in the region to mutually deter threats to United States interests by the Government of Iran, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the IRGC’s Qods Force, and Hezbollah.
4.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Western Hemisphere
The term Western Hemisphere means the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, South America, and Central America.
(2)
Relevant congressional committees
The term relevant congressional committees means the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
5.
Requirement of a strategy to address Iran’s growing hostile presence and activity in the Western Hemisphere
(a)
In general
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall conduct an assessment of the threats posed to the United States by Iran’s growing presence and activity in the Western Hemisphere and submit to the relevant congressional committees the results of the assessment and a strategy to address Iran’s growing hostile presence and activity in the Western Hemisphere.
(b)
Matters To be included
The strategy described in subsection (a) should include—
(1)
a description of the presence, activities, and operations of Iran, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), its Qods Force, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations linked to Iran that may be present in the Western Hemisphere, including information about their leaders, objectives, and areas of influence and information on their financial networks, trafficking activities, and safe havens;
(2)
a description of the terrain, population, ports, foreign firms, airports, borders, media outlets, financial centers, foreign embassies, charities, religious and cultural centers, and income-generating activities in the Western Hemisphere utilized by Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations linked to Iran that may be present in the Western Hemisphere;
(3)
a description of the relationship of Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, and Hezbollah with transnational criminal organizations linked to Iran and other terrorist organizations in the Western Hemisphere, including information on financial networks and trafficking activities;
(4)
a description of the relationship of Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations linked to Iran that may be present in the Western Hemisphere with the governments in the Western Hemisphere, including military-to-military relations and diplomatic, economic, and security partnerships and agreements;
(5)
a description of the Federal law enforcement capabilities, military forces, State and local government institutions, and other critical elements, such as nongovernmental organizations, in the Western Hemisphere that may organize to counter the threat posed by Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations linked to Iran that may be present in the Western Hemisphere;
(6)
a description of activity by Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations linked to Iran that may be present at the United States borders with Mexico and Canada and at other international borders within the Western Hemisphere, including operations related to drug, human, and arms trafficking, human support networks, financial support, narco-tunneling, and technological advancements that incorporates—
(A)
with respect to the United States borders, in coordination with the Governments of Mexico and Canada and the Secretary of Homeland Security, a plan to address resources, technology, and infrastructure to create a secure United States border and strengthen the ability of the United States and its allies to prevent operatives from Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, Hezbollah, or any other terrorist organization from entering the United States; and
(B)
within Latin American countries, a multiagency action plan, in coordination with United States allies and partners in the region, that includes the development of strong rule-of-law institutions to provide security in such countries and a counterterrorism and counter-radicalization plan to isolate Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations linked to Iran that may be present in the Western Hemisphere from their sources of financial support and counter their facilitation of terrorist activity; and
(7)
a plan—
(A)
to address any efforts by foreign persons, entities, and governments in the region to assist Iran in evading United States and international sanctions;
(B)
to protect United States interests and assets in the Western Hemisphere, including embassies, consulates, businesses, energy pipelines, and cultural organizations, including threats to United States allies;
(C)
to support United States efforts to designate persons and entities in the Western Hemisphere for proliferation activities and terrorist activities relating to Iran, including affiliates of the IRGC, its Qods Force, and Hezbollah, under applicable law including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act; and
(D)
to address the vital national security interests of the United States in ensuring energy supplies from the Western Hemisphere that are free from the influence of any foreign government that would attempt to manipulate or disrupt global energy markets.
(c)
Development
In developing the strategy under this section, the Secretary of State shall consult with the heads of all appropriate United States departments and agencies, including the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, and the United States Trade Representative.
(d)
Form
The strategy in this section may be submitted in classified form, but shall include an unclassified summary of policy recommendations to address the growing Iranian threat in the Western Hemisphere.
6.
Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of State should keep the relevant congressional committees continually informed on the hostile actions of Iran in the Western Hemisphere.
7.
Rule of construction
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit the rights or protections enjoyed by United States citizens under the United States Constitution or other Federal law, or to create additional authorities for the Federal Government that are contrary to the United States Constitution and United States law

On December 28, 2012, President Obama signed into law, the Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere United States border and strengthen the ability of the United States and its allies to prevent operatives from Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, Hezbollah, or any other terrorist organization from entering the United States

On December 28, 2012, President Obama signed into law, the Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act which is designed to curb Iran’s presence and activity in the region. The bill calls on the Department of Homeland Security to work with Canada and Mexico, “to address resources, technology, and infrastructure to create a secure United States border and strengthen the ability of the United States and its allies to prevent operatives from Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, Hezbollah, or any other terrorist organization from entering the United States.” Julie Carmichael, spokeswoman for Public Safety Minister Vic Toews discussed Canada’s efforts to counter any perceived hostility from Iran in the Americas. She is quoted in the Globe and Mail as saying, “We continually assess threats while co-operating with international partners, including the U.S., to address threats to our common security.” Carmichael added, “The Beyond the Border Action Plan as announced by Prime Minister Harper and President Obama provides a framework to identify threats before they reach North America.” Under the perimeter security deal, Canada is further aligning itself with U.S. foreign policy interests and could be expected to play a greater role in the global war on terror.

Federal Court Backs Government in Lawsuit by Canadian Arab Federation

Federal Court Backs Government in Lawsuit by Canadian Arab Federation

Ottawa, December 24, 2013 — Yesterday, the Federal Court upheld the Minister of Immigration's decision, in 2009, not to renew two settlement funding agreements with the Canadian Arab Federation. The Government's position was that the organisation was an inappropriate partner for the delivery of taxpayer-funded services to newcomers due to its apparent endorsement of listed terrorist organisations and public statements that were arguably anti-Semitic. Paul Calandra, Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister, on behalf of the Government of Canada, today issued the following statement:
"The Federal Court ruling is a victory for common sense and the rule of law.
"Our Government's position is clear: organisations that appear to promote hatred, including anti-Semitism, or excuse violence and terrorism do not have the right, and should not expect, to receive tax dollars to deliver Government services."
For further information (media only), please contact:
Alexis Pavlich
Minister’s Office
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
613-954-1064

Police State North America: U.S.-Canada Border Security Agreement. Sharing Biographic and Biometric Data

Police State North America: U.S.-Canada Border Security Agreement. Sharing Biographic and Biometric Data

canadianborder
In the light of the attack  in Ottawa on October 22, 2014, we republish this article from February 5, 2013. After the attack, US President Barack Obama said “it was important for Canada and the United States to be in sync when it came to dealing with terrorist activity.”

The U.S. and Canada have made significant progress in advancing the Beyond the Border deal and continue to implement various perimeter security initiatives. Without much fanfare, they have signed an immigration agreement that would allow them to share biographic and at a later date, biometric information. As part of a North American security perimeter, both countries are further harmonizing border security and immigration measures. Canada is further taking on U.S. security priorities and this could include a bigger role in the war on terrorism.
It’s been over a year since Prime Minister Stephen Harper and President Barack Obama announced the Beyond the Border and the Regulatory Cooperation Council action plans. On December 14, 2012, the U.S. and Canada issued the Beyond the Border implementation report that highlights the objectives that were achieved over the past year and the work that has yet to be done. It explained that moving forward, “Key future initiatives include harmonizing our trusted trader programs, making significant infrastructure investments at our key land border crossings, fully implementing an entry/exit program at the land border, expanding preclearance operations to the land, rail, and marine domains.” The report also acknowledged challenges facing the Next-Generation pilot project which would permit teams of cross-designated officers to operate on both sides of the border. It was originally scheduled to begin last summer. While steady progress has been made, a lot more work is needed to meet the goals of the Beyond the Border action plan. Over the next several years, other aspects of the deal will be phased-in incrementally with specific deliverables due this year, in 2014 and also in 2015.
Another important facet of the economic and security perimeter agreement is the U.S.-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC). A progress report to the leaders outlines accomplishments made in aligning regulations in the areas of agriculture and food, transportation, the environment, health and personal care products, workplace chemicals, as well as nanotechnology. This includes cooperation on pilot projects, scientific and technical collaborations and harmonized testing procedures. RCC working groups have developed detailed work plans for the various initiatives with objectives that will be implemented over the next couple of years. In Canada, some fear that deepening regulatory integration with the U.S. could weaken and erode any independent regulatory capacity. This could lead to a race to the bottom with respect to regulatory standards.
In December of last year, the U.S. and Canada signed the Immigration Information Sharing Treaty which is tied to the Beyond the Border deal. Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney stated that the, “agreement builds on our countries’ mutual efforts to protect our common borders and the surrounding perimeter, through improved screening of immigrants and visitors.” He went on to say, “Enhanced information sharing of foreign nationals will protect the safety and security of Canadians by helping us prevent terrorists, violent criminals, and others, who pose a risk, from entering Canada or the United States.” Under the treaty, Canada and the U.S. will share biographic information from third country nationals who apply for a visa, a travel permit or claim asylum. In 2014, it will also include the sharing of biometric information. There are privacy concerns on how far-reaching the data collected will be shared. This threatens the sovereignty of Canada with regards to retaining control over information at its own borders.
On December 28, 2012, President Obama signed into law, the Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act which is designed to curb Iran’s presence and activity in the region. The bill calls on the Department of Homeland Security to work with Canada and Mexico, “to address resources, technology, and infrastructure to create a secure United States border and strengthen the ability of the United States and its allies to prevent operatives from Iran, the IRGC, its Qods Force, Hezbollah, or any other terrorist organization from entering the United States.” Julie Carmichael, spokeswoman for Public Safety Minister Vic Toews discussed Canada’s efforts to counter any perceived hostility from Iran in the Americas. She is quoted in the Globe and Mail as saying, “We continually assess threats while co-operating with international partners, including the U.S., to address threats to our common security.” Carmichael added, “The Beyond the Border Action Plan as announced by Prime Minister Harper and President Obama provides a framework to identify threats before they reach North America.” Under the perimeter security deal, Canada is further aligning itself with U.S. foreign policy interests and could be expected to play a greater role in the global war on terror.
Through the Beyond the Border agreement, the U.S. and Canada are deepening economic and security integration which is laying the foundation for a North American security perimeter. Both countries are also engaged in the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations with Mexico and other member nations. This is part of efforts to create a free trade area of the Asia-Pacific and could be used to update and expand NAFTA. Another key priority for U.S.-Canada relations is North America’s energy future. President Obama is expected to make a final decision on the Keystone XL pipeline sometime this year. Meanwhile, there is growing environmental opposition to the proposed project which would carry oil from western Canada to the Texas gulf coast.
Dana Gabriel is an activist and independent researcher. He writes about trade, globalization, sovereignty, security, as well as other issues. Contact: beyourownleader@hotmail.com. Visit his blog at Be Your Own Leader

Operation Hornets Nest: Alleged Snowden document says US/UK/Israel are behind ISIS

Operation Hornets Nest: Alleged Snowden document says US/UK/Israel are behind ISIS

From Gulf Daily News…
 The former employee at US National Security Agency (NSA), Edward Snowden, has revealed that the British and American intelligence and the Mossad worked together to create the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
Snowden said intelligence services of three countries created a terrorist organisation that is able to attract all extremists of the world to one place, using a strategy called “the hornet’s nest”.
NSA documents refer to recent implementation of the hornet’s nest to protect the Zionist entity by creating religious and Islamic slogans.
According to documents released by Snowden, “The only solution for the protection of the Jewish state “is to create an enemy near its borders”.
Leaks revealed that ISIS leader and cleric Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi took intensive military training for a whole year in the hands of Mossad, besides courses in theology and the art of speech..
Facts:
1) ISIS leader Al-Baghdadi was once a super-high level prisoner of the US government. Despite the fact that the US had offered a ten million dollar reward for him, the Obama regime ordered his release in 2009.
2) The Obama regime, with major support from Senate neo-cons John McCain and Lindsey Graham, gave hundreds of millions in military aid to Sunni Jihadists in Syria. Thousands of individuals receiving US aid are now members of ISIS. In fact, ISIS has even posted pictures of ISIS fighters with US Senator John McCain on the internet.
3) Israel has directly aided Sunni Jihadists in Syria by bombing Syrian military assets during Jihadist attacks.
4) The Israeli Prime Minister has reacted to the ISIS spearheaded Sunni/Shia Civil War in Iraq with borderline glee. The president of Israel has also suggested that a Sunni/Shia war is beneficial to the future of Israel.
5) The US and Britiain provided Sunni Jihadists with Toyota trucks in Syria. When, an army of ISIS fighters rolled over the Syria/Iraq border it looked like a commercial for Toyota.

Senate neo-cons John McCain and Lindsey Graham, gave hundreds of millions in military aid to Sunni Jihadists in Syria

2) The Obama regime, with major support from Senate neo-cons John McCain and Lindsey Graham, gave hundreds of millions in military aid to Sunni Jihadists in Syria. Thousands of individuals receiving US aid are now members of ISIS. In fact, ISIS has even posted pictures of ISIS fighters with US Senator John McCain on the internet.

UPDATED: Possible Jihadi Attack in NYC

UPDATED: Possible Jihadi Attack in NYC

Earlier today a man with an axe approached a group of NYPD officers and, in an unprovoked attack, struck two of them with the axe before succumbing to a hail of bullets from the officers.
Take a look at the picture we have here. Look carefully at the subject’s head and face.
extralarge
Now look at that same photo at the link below to the New York Daily News report on the incident (the perp’s face is obscured electronically)…
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/police-shoots-kills-man-ax-queens-article-1.1984914
It sure looks like the dead axeman could be a Salafi Jihadi, doesn’t it? And when news organizations start concealing images like that, it really makes us suspicious.
Now consider this report: The NYPD is reportedly now engaged in a “massive” operation in the area…
http://heavy.com/news/2014/10/nypd-axe-attack-suspect-dead-terror-attack/
Finally, and this really almost seals it in our mind:
At a news conference at a hospital where one officer was being treated for a serious head wound, Police Commissioner William Bratton said that investigators were still trying to confirm the identity of the assailant and determine a motive.
Asked if the attack could be related to terrorism, Bratton didn’t rule it out.
In this day and age when officials are almost always quick to rule out terrorism before they have any justification for ruling anything out, this statement almost amounts to a smoking gun…
http://www.newsday.com/news/region-state/nyc-police-ax-wielding-suspect-shot-by-officers-1.9539019
Finally, there’s this:
Thursday evening the New York Police Department issued a patrol bulletin alerting officers to be in a state of heightened awareness after Wednesday’s murder of a Canadian soldier and shootout at the Parliament complex in Ottawa. The bulletin warns of potential attacks on uniformed officers.
Police from the Intelligence Division are checking the suspect’s hard drives for any cyber activity.
 LATE ADDITION:
At least one report quotes law enforcement sources as saying the attacker was a Jihadi…
 Here are some images from the reported attacker’s Facebook page:
823495_10202026213989776_1595952907_o
1474472_10201818227910254_206769240_n

Share this:

Obama Says Ebola Is a Trial Run for Coming AIRBORNE Disease!

What School Officials Have Just Agreed To Do With This Shocking Booklet Will Leave You Speechless

What School Officials Have Just Agreed To Do With This Shocking Booklet Will Leave You Speechless

...on National Religious Freedom Day...


Bible arrows
High school students in Florida will soon be given free copies of a Bible-bashing booklet promoted by an atheist organization — a publication whose front cover depicts a lecherous, cartoon Bible sexually assaulting a screaming woman.
The pamphlet entitled “An X-Rated Book: Sex and Obscenity in the Bible” will be distributed in 11 public high schools in Orange County, Florida. An atheist organization, the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), pressured reluctant school officials who eventually agreed to allow the booklet to be handed out to students.

Advertisement-content continues below

And when will this little purple pamphlet be offered to Florida teens for free in their schools? On National Religious Freedom Day this coming January.
Screen shot 2014-10-22 at 4.28.41 PM
According to a report on CNSNews.com, a lawyer for the atheist group that won the right to hand out the controversial booklet called the Bible more “obscene” than their “X-Rated” publication:
FFRF Legal Counsel Andrew Seidel contended to CNSNews.com that the pamphlet with the cover depicting a Bible engaging in sexual assault is “pretty tame” compared to the Bible itself.
“I think if you look at the content of that brochure and what is actually in the Bible, and some of the things that are in the Bible in terms of sex and compare that to the cover [of the pamphlet], the cover is pretty tame compared to anything that is in the Bible,” Seidel said.
“I think the bottom line is, you can’t consider any of our materials obscene when compared to the Bible,” he said.
A news release on the Foundation’s website notes that a Florida District Court dismissed FFRF’s free speech case against the Orange County School District as moot, since the district agreed to let FFRF distribute all of the literature it had previously prohibited.

Advertisement-content continues below

In 2013, the Freedom From Religions Foundation sued the school district after it agreed to allow an evangelical Christian group to distribute Bibles.

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/school-officials-just-agreed-shocking-booklet-will-leave-speechless/#PGIPAv5ftxxfA5qc.99

Canadian fighter jets intercept Russian military planes

Canadian fighter jets intercept Russian military planes

Other similar incidents in recent weeks

The Associated Press Posted: Oct 21, 2014 4:11 PM ET Last Updated: Oct 21, 2014 4:11 PM ET
Two Canadian CF-18 Hornet jets were scrambled from the Siauliai Air Base in Lithuania on Monday.
Two Canadian CF-18 Hornet jets were scrambled from the Siauliai Air Base in Lithuania on Monday. (Cpl. Gabrielle DesRocher/Canadian Air Force/AP)
NATO scrambled fighter jets twice in two days to intercept Russian military aircraft over the Baltic Sea, it said Tuesday amid reports that Russian military activity in the region is increasing.

Lt.-Col. Robert Gericke said the Russian aircraft were flying in international airspace and had not violated the territory of alliance members.

Two Canadian CF-18 Hornet jets were scrambled from the Siauliai Air Base in Lithuania on Monday to intercept a Russian Ilyushin-20 surveillance aircraft, which they shadowed for some 15 minutes, NATO said.
"Once identification was successful, the intercept mission was completed and the two Hornets returned to their base," a NATO statement said. 

Earlier, the Latvian military tweeted that NATO F-16 jets were dispatched on Tuesday to intercept a Russian Ilyushin-20 surveillance aircraft over the Baltic Sea. Gericke confirmed that NATO jets had also intercepted a Russian aircraft that day, but could not immediately provide more details.

NATO, which has 16 fighter jets in the region monitoring Baltic airspace, said it regularly launches jets to identify "unknown or potentially hostile aircraft" in the proximity of national airspace.

There were two similar incidents in the region on Oct. 7 and Sept. 11, but on neither occasion did the Russian aircraft constitute a threat to NATO forces, the alliance said.

In the past five days, the Swedish navy has been combing the Stockholm archipelago for signs of a foreign submarine that officials suspect entered its territorial waters illegally. It hasn't officially linked Russia to the suspected intrusion.

The Finnish military says that Russian military aircraft have violated the small Nordic country's airspace five times this year, and the Environment Institute said Russian military ships had twice intercepted one of its research vessels in international waters.

On Sept. 5, an Estonian security service officer was detained on the Russian border — Estonia and Russia disagree on which side of it — and is still in custody in Moscow.

Coup d’etat – Phelps and Strunk

Coup d’etat – Phelps and Strunk

http://www.scribd.com/doc/212515572/CES-NOM-and-Aff-in-Support-of-2nd-NOM-to-Renew-and-Reargue-Service-w-Exhibits-and-Supplement-to-the-Complaint-29642-2008
The link above provides access to the complete court filing on ScribD.  Below, is a 10 page excerpt from a case being heard on the 28th of March 2014.
The Coup d’etat provides the explicit details exposing the conspiracy by which control was taken over America by fraud and deception.
Coup d’etat Coup d'etat_Page_01 Coup d'etat_Page_02 Coup d'etat_Page_03 Coup d'etat_Page_04 Coup d'etat_Page_05 Coup d'etat_Page_06 Coup d'etat_Page_07 Coup d'etat_Page_08 Coup d'etat_Page_09 Coup d'etat_Page_10

About arnierosner

As an American I advocate a republic form of government, self-reliance, and adherence to the basic philosophy of the founding fathers and the founding documents, I ONLY respect those who respect and "HONOR" their honor. No exceptions!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Coup d’etat – Phelps and Strunk

Chris Strunk says:
BRIEFLY: The appearance before the Honorable David I. Schmidt was attended
by Mr. Van Allen, Mr. Pepper of the NYS AG, and the attorney from the NYC
Department of Law and me.
The Court was presented by the NYS AG with the prior December 4, 2008
decision and order dismissing the Article 78 Petition 29641-08, that set
“the Law of the Case” for the companion case with separate Summons and
Complaint Index No.: 29642-08.
The NYS AG argued that that order had dismissed the companion case too.
However, could not explain why the complaint was never dismissed by an
order of entry by the NYS AG and why for the next two years additional
interlocutory motions and an application for order to show cause also did
not result in the entry by the NYS AG to dismiss either.
The Court questioning of parties went to the Article 78 29641-08 Petition
to refresh his memory, being that I challenged whether or not by the State
constitution an elector that had been appoint to serve before the election
could be a state officer and also serve as a public officers too when both
positions receive pay, and that is expressly in violation of the State
Constitution and Public Officer law (POL).
The December 4, 2008 decision in effect stated that like a notary who may
be a state officer and public officer position for pay as an exception in
POL, that the Elector is a private citizen serving a federal purpose.
In effect of the decision did not need to be appealed as the decision
became the “law of the case” to proceed ahead using that determination to
seek remedy in 29642-08 complaint, and when I tried to amend the complaint
was held in March 14, 2011 that I had not properly served the Candidate
McCain and Obama; and
Therefore, according to Judge Schmidt on March 14, 2011, under the circumstance as it would be a fruitless effort since the statute of limitations for the 2008 election had passed, the Judge suggested I file a separate new case on the matter of breach of duty by State officers with fraud in fact regarding BHO and McCain not being NBC that became the
6500-11 case that was assigned by a perjured RJI by McCain’s attorney (request for judicial intervention) to assign a Judge to the new case, therein was affirmed not to have a related case, and thereby ended up assigned to Judge Schack a member of the “HIGH CULTURE” who with the DVD’s congressional military industrial complex’s defendants McCain, Brzezinski (whose son BHO appointed ambassador to Sweden), Peter G. Peterson, George Soros and others sought to make the case go away and have me sanctioned in the amount in excess of $177k — now with multiple orders taken on appeal
with briefs due May 5, 2014, and having now received the Order of 4 March 2014 by the four Judge Panel denial of provision “for civilian due process of law”.
The Order denying me provision “for civilian due process of law” sets the basis of law for a renewed argument for completion of service nunc pro tunc in 29642-08, and as a transaction sets the law of the case that administratively requires the Office of Court Administration to prove the eligibility of BHO to serve as the Commander-in-chief over the state court system during the ongoing National emergency under 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) that suspended all constitutions; and
Thereby Mr. Van Allen’s intervention denied on 11-22-11 is alive (requests the NYS BOE use “NBC” instead of “Born a Citizen” for POTUS candidates as well as challenge to the 2012 reapportionment controlled by martial process) with new transactions as constitutional questions of first impression as a supplement to the complaint rather than amendment in that completion of service has yet to happen.
The Court took the motions on submission seemingly on procedural questions without argument of any of the merits of the new transactions. The Appellate court has held that as long as new transactions are related and change the outcome of a past case in which the parties remain the same and even were it closed may be the basis to restore to calendar.
In summary
That as an administrative matter effecting Plaintiff, it has been confirmed by the Appellate Court with their 4 March 2014 order denying me “civilian due process of law” that Barack Hussein Obama II as Commander-in-chief, based upon the continuing national emergency under 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b), has direct executive authority over the provision for martial due process of law provided by the NYS Unified Court System and thereby is of a direct interest of this court to prove to Plaintiff that Mr. Obama is eligible accordingly; and among other relief may be easily done by ordering that any State records under State Court jurisdiction be produced to prove Mr. Obama’s eligibility or else be obligated to provide Plaintiff “civilian due process of law”, for
> without being NBC, all of Mr. Obama’s acts are void ab initio as the national emergency that by statute is required to be renewed bi-annually have expired.
That when Mr. Obama went to Columbia University, according to David Paterson’s associate, Percy Sutton Esq. now deceased, Mr. Obama received foreign student funding and that record now is in the repository with the New York State Department of Education; and as such the pressing matter of whether or not the Unified State Court system is to provide civilian or martial due process of law may be decided by this Court by its order to release the record of foreign student funding and make a declaratory judgment thereafter.
Plaintiff in REPLY based upon all the motions’ affidavits and exhibits in support of relief, denies for the foregoing reason that somehow that Van Allen offers _NO REASON TO REVISIT_ this Court’s denial; and were Mr. Pepper’s allegation true then he would not have included in this record Mr. David Lewis, Esq. and Daniel Chill Esq.,
as they were parties to Mr. Van Allen’s cases in Albany without STRUNK and as Mr. Van Allen has shown in Acting Justice Platkin’s decision and order that in fact his intervention herein is the only place he may seek relief and serve the interest of all the voters of the State of New York in the matter of instructions for any candidate running for president and in the matter of the use of the NYS Constitution Article III in redistricting from the 2010 Census that the New York State Court of Appeals use of the Article III provisions says is merely “academic”; and makes sense under the present provision of marital due process of law under the authority of Mr. Obama as Commander-in-chief, means that use of any municipal law or Constitutional provision whether at the state or federal level is advisory only as to the martial process accordingly – and thereby goes to Mr. Van Allen’s need for the OCA to provide proof of Mr. Obama’s eligibility, inter alia as easily suggested above.
That as Judicial Notice herein because of the gravity of the constitutional question of first impression before this Court, that were Mr. OBAMA declared unable to fulfill the duties of the Commander-in-chief with direct authority over the State Court system that
this has far ranging consequences to the presiding Justice of the State Supreme Court in this matter, as there is a duty to investigate and issue a declaratory judgment on the finding(s) as is associated with the following Judicial responsibility under the following Federal statutes accordingly, quote:
18 U.S. CODE § 2381 – TREASON
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
18 U.S. CODE § 2382 – MISPRISION OF TREASON
(Pub. L. 113-86[1], except 113-79[2].)
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or _TO THE GOVERNOR _or _TO SOME JUDGE_ or _JUSTICE OF A PARTICULAR STATE_, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. (emphasis by Plaintiff)
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807[3]; Pub. L. 103–322[4], title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H),Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147[5].) Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 3 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, § 3,35
Stat. 1088[6]).Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the Alternative.Amendments 1994—Pub. L. 103–322[4]substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $1,000”.
18 U.S. CODE § 2383 – REBELLION OR INSURRECTION
Current through Pub. L. 113-86[1], except 113-79[2].
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
>
>
18 U.S. CODE § 2384 – SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States
> contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
>
18 U.S. CODE § 2385 – ADVOCATING OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT
Current through Pub. L. 113-86[1], except 113-79[2].
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—
>
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
>
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
>
As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
>
The decision should be within 10 days in my experience.
> Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris agent
>
> “SURETY NO MORE” WEBSITE:
>
> http://associationforsovereignhomerulewithin.org/

Look: The Sheer Barbarity Of ISIS Is Revealed In These 12 Jaw-Dropping Satellite Photos

Look: The Sheer Barbarity Of ISIS Is Revealed In These 12 Jaw-Dropping Satellite Photos

...the photos demonstrate the toll on the civilian population.


ISIShorrorpic3
New images of a Syrian border town reflect the burden on civilians as Islamic State (ISIS) militants have moved in on the town.
Two sets of photos show the Syrian town of Kobani, located right near the Turkish border, just before ISIS militants moved in and then after. Kurdish forces are fighting against ISIS along with American-led coalition airstrikes, preventing the capture of the town, but the photos demonstrate the toll on the civilian population.

Advertisement-content continues below

The photos were released last week by the United Nations Institute for Training and Research, as first reported by Mashable. The ‘before’ pictures are from September 6, and the ‘after’ pictures are from October 15.
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research


Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research


Advertisement-content continues below




Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research

Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research



Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research


Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research



Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research
Photo: United Nations Institute for Training and Research

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/look-photos-reveal-horrors-isis/#DU4kIXRPdX83gw4h.99

This Famous Actor Just Acknowledged That Obama Is a “Black Muslim” on Live TV [WATCH]

This Famous Actor Just Acknowledged That Obama Is a “Black Muslim” on Live TV [WATCH]


Liberal actor and activist Alec Baldwin and comedian Russell Brand recently sat down on the RT’s Keiser Report, where they discussed, among other things, American politics. As expected, there was plenty of conservative and Fox News bashing, especially of Sean Hannity, whom Baldwin has a deep hatred for, but there was one exchange that stood out from the rest. (H/T Western Journalism)
Baldwin attempted to psychoanalyze conservatives, giving his reasons for their feeling disillusioned with America at the moment. “America is a country run by white Christian men. It has been for 75 or 100 years,” Baldwin quipped. To which Brand responded, “The president is a black Muslim.” Baldwin did not disagree, continuing his point, “That’s now – that’s now.  And he’s only president because he ran against a woman for the nomination.”

Baldwin claims that despite the fact America elected and reelected its first black president, the nation still is as racist and prejudice as ever.
He believes that only because America is more sexist than racist did Obama get the nomination over Hilary in 2008. He claims this is the result of men having been suspicious of women for far longer than blacks. This is an egregious claim, but standard fare from liberals who love to employ mental gymnastics to push the lie that America is a racist and sexist nation.
Click here to get a FREE subscription to the Conservative Tribune.

Brand and Baldwin tend to fancy themselves intellectuals, both often speaking on political issues, pretending their IQs are above room temperature. Both are liberal darlings, as they are regularly trotted out to excoriate those who do not buy into to the liberal worldview. (Baldwin’s occasional anti-homosexual tirades, however, have been something a problem to the left in the past.)  However, most of the time they only end up displaying their incredible ignorance when asked about politics.
Liberals’ refusal to admit that we no longer live in the 1850s is astonishing. They stifle debate by labeling contrary views as racist and sexist, doing their best to deflect criticism of the president or any other ideological ally. Their disdain for America is obvious, as is their victim complex. They only have bad things to say about the nation, focusing solely on past shortcomings, which poses the question: Why are they still here?
Please share on Facebook and Twitter if you think Baldwin and Brand are pinheads.