| ||||||||
 | ||||||||
MartyM Posts: 1533 Join date: 2012-01-17 Age: 65 Location: NH |
| |||||||
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Rumour?: U.S. Chief Justice Roberts “Signed Off On Interpol To Arrest And Remove Obama on 25 Charges of Treason”
To all modern Sons of Liberty: THIS is your time. Break their windows. Break them NOW.”
To all modern Sons of Liberty: THIS is your time. Break their windows. Break them NOW.”
Remember that guy? In 2010, he encouraged people to throw bricks through the windows of Democratic Party offices, in protest of Obamacare. You may recall that the district office of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was one of the offices that had its windows broken in the name of fighting socialism. His name is Mike Vanderboegh, and he is the leader of a militia group currently camped out in support of Cliven Bundy.
He played a key role in turning the “Fast and Furious” thing into a scandal. He has participated in the “Minutemen” patrols of the southern border. He runs a far-right blog where he rails against the government and the “collectivists” and “Marxism-Leninism”. He decries President Obama’s “collectivism” and describes himself as a “Christian libertarian”. He’s written an unpublished novel about militia groups planning to assassinate government officials in protest of gun control and gay marriage, a book he describes as “a combination field manual, technical manual, and call to arms”.
But this is the best part: he lives on government disability benefits.
That’s right: he has time for all these anti-government activities because of that government check that comes every month. Someone at Democratic Underground remembered the stories from 2010 and put the pieces together.
I don’t even have to put a clever joke here. On this one, they write themselves.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024896762
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/25/AR2010032501722.html
Remember that guy? In 2010, he encouraged people to throw bricks through the windows of Democratic Party offices, in protest of Obamacare. You may recall that the district office of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was one of the offices that had its windows broken in the name of fighting socialism. His name is Mike Vanderboegh, and he is the leader of a militia group currently camped out in support of Cliven Bundy.
He played a key role in turning the “Fast and Furious” thing into a scandal. He has participated in the “Minutemen” patrols of the southern border. He runs a far-right blog where he rails against the government and the “collectivists” and “Marxism-Leninism”. He decries President Obama’s “collectivism” and describes himself as a “Christian libertarian”. He’s written an unpublished novel about militia groups planning to assassinate government officials in protest of gun control and gay marriage, a book he describes as “a combination field manual, technical manual, and call to arms”.
But this is the best part: he lives on government disability benefits.
That’s right: he has time for all these anti-government activities because of that government check that comes every month. Someone at Democratic Underground remembered the stories from 2010 and put the pieces together.
I don’t even have to put a clever joke here. On this one, they write themselves.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024896762
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/25/AR2010032501722.html
EXCLUSIVE: Memos show EPA officials tried to kill mine project before scientific review Agency officials coached tribes on how to oppose Alaska’s Pebble Mine
EXCLUSIVE: Memos show EPA officials tried to kill mine project before scientific review
Agency officials coached tribes on how to oppose Alaska’s Pebble Mine
EPA generates political pressure for Alaskan gold mine
Washington Times reports that the EPA is generating political pressure to get its incentives passed.
A presentation prepared in 2010 for then-EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson made ... more >
Though President Obama has repeatedly urged that science guide environmental decisions, regulators inside the Environmental Protection Agency
secretly worked with tribal and environmental activists to preempt a
full review of an Alaskan mine and veto the project before the owners’
permits could be considered, internal memos show.
Charged with being neutral arbiters, EPA officials instead began advocating for a preemptive veto of the Pebble Mine project in western Alaska as early as 2008, long before any scientific studies were conducted or the permit applications for the project were even filed, the emails obtained by The Washington Times show.
“As you know I feel that both of these projects (Chuitna and Pebble) merit consideration of a 404C veto,” EPA official Phillip North wrote in an email suggesting that the mining project’s rejection be added to the agenda of an agency retreat in summer 2009.
EPA wouldn’t even announce the beginning of a scientific review of Pebble Mine until 2011, two years after Mr. North’s email, but discussion of a pre-emptive veto dominated internal discussions inside the agency for much of the three years beforehand.
At the same time, EPA officials had regular contacts with potential opponents of the mining project, coordinating activities with environmentalists and even coaching local tribes on how they could strengthen their case opposing the project.
“Tribes have a very special role in Pebble issues because of government-to-government relations,” Mr. North wrote to an Alaskan tribal leader in June 2010. “EPA takes that very seriously. I encourage you to develop that relationship as much as you can.”
The efforts to get EPA to veto the project before the Army Corps of Engineers could evaluate the engineering and scientific impacts reached all the way to top officials in Washington.
A presentation prepared in 2010 for then-EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson made clear that a preemptive veto “had never been done before in the history” of the Clean Water Act and could risk litigation.
EPA eventually conducted a narrow scientific review and preemptively vetoed the mine project this February, before the Army Corps of Engineers could decide the permits for the project on the scientific and technical merits.
The decision has become one of the most controversial in recent EPA history, prompting the owners of the proposed mine, members of Congress and the state of Alaska to request a formal investigation by the EPA’s internal watchdog, the inspector general.
“The state is concerned that actual bias within the agency induced EPA to invoke a novel interpretation of its statutory authority to conduct the assessment and led to the development of an assessment that contains findings likely tainted by that bias,” Alaska Attorney General Michael C. Geraghty wrote Inspector General Arthur Elkins on Feb. 3.
Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee made a similar request after reviewing some of the same documents obtained by The Times. “Taking such unprecedented federal agency action with predetermined conclusions is not sound government practice and delegitimizes other necessary regulatory action undertaken by the EPA,” the lawmakers argued.
EPA officials defend the process, saying the documents reflect internal deliberations and not necessarily how the final decisions were made.
“There may be emails that people point to with staff in EPA, but this is a large organization and you should look at what the leadership of EPA has actually done. We haven’t made up our minds at all on how this process will ends, this is just a process,” the agency said in a statement given to The Times. “We believe that any action taken should be based on the science.”
Environmental activists in the region accused Pebble Mine’s backers of raising old, discredited arguments to push through a project that they say will decimate the local fishing industry and kill thousands of jobs.
Story Continues →Charged with being neutral arbiters, EPA officials instead began advocating for a preemptive veto of the Pebble Mine project in western Alaska as early as 2008, long before any scientific studies were conducted or the permit applications for the project were even filed, the emails obtained by The Washington Times show.
“As you know I feel that both of these projects (Chuitna and Pebble) merit consideration of a 404C veto,” EPA official Phillip North wrote in an email suggesting that the mining project’s rejection be added to the agenda of an agency retreat in summer 2009.
EPA wouldn’t even announce the beginning of a scientific review of Pebble Mine until 2011, two years after Mr. North’s email, but discussion of a pre-emptive veto dominated internal discussions inside the agency for much of the three years beforehand.
At the same time, EPA officials had regular contacts with potential opponents of the mining project, coordinating activities with environmentalists and even coaching local tribes on how they could strengthen their case opposing the project.
“Tribes have a very special role in Pebble issues because of government-to-government relations,” Mr. North wrote to an Alaskan tribal leader in June 2010. “EPA takes that very seriously. I encourage you to develop that relationship as much as you can.”
The efforts to get EPA to veto the project before the Army Corps of Engineers could evaluate the engineering and scientific impacts reached all the way to top officials in Washington.
A presentation prepared in 2010 for then-EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson made clear that a preemptive veto “had never been done before in the history” of the Clean Water Act and could risk litigation.
EPA eventually conducted a narrow scientific review and preemptively vetoed the mine project this February, before the Army Corps of Engineers could decide the permits for the project on the scientific and technical merits.
The decision has become one of the most controversial in recent EPA history, prompting the owners of the proposed mine, members of Congress and the state of Alaska to request a formal investigation by the EPA’s internal watchdog, the inspector general.
“The state is concerned that actual bias within the agency induced EPA to invoke a novel interpretation of its statutory authority to conduct the assessment and led to the development of an assessment that contains findings likely tainted by that bias,” Alaska Attorney General Michael C. Geraghty wrote Inspector General Arthur Elkins on Feb. 3.
Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee made a similar request after reviewing some of the same documents obtained by The Times. “Taking such unprecedented federal agency action with predetermined conclusions is not sound government practice and delegitimizes other necessary regulatory action undertaken by the EPA,” the lawmakers argued.
EPA officials defend the process, saying the documents reflect internal deliberations and not necessarily how the final decisions were made.
“There may be emails that people point to with staff in EPA, but this is a large organization and you should look at what the leadership of EPA has actually done. We haven’t made up our minds at all on how this process will ends, this is just a process,” the agency said in a statement given to The Times. “We believe that any action taken should be based on the science.”
Environmental activists in the region accused Pebble Mine’s backers of raising old, discredited arguments to push through a project that they say will decimate the local fishing industry and kill thousands of jobs.
Pebble Mine’s backers “continually and deliberately fail to mention that EPA’s
involvement in Bristol Bay came at the request of the people of Alaska
and the fishermen of Bristol Bay ,” Katherine Carscallen, sustainability
director for the Bristol Bay Regional Seafood Development Association,
said in a statement Wednesday on the organization’s website. “We know
enough about [Pebble Limited Partnership‘s] plans — from its own documents — to conclude beyond doubt that development of a mine like Pebble would result in unacceptable adverse effects on the Bristol Bay watershed.”
Flashpoint
But Tom Collier, a Clinton administration official who now serves as CEO of Pebble Partnership that is seeking to build the mine, said there was no legal reason for the EPA to make its decision before the Army Corps of Engineers completed its scientific review and issued an environmental impact report.
“Then EPA has every right under the statute to step in whether they so choose, but at least at that time they’ve got a strong record that’s been developed out of a rigorous, transparent and well-used practice,” he said in an interview.
The Pebble Mine is the latest flashpoint between industries eager to tap Alaska’s rich bounty of minerals, metals and fuels beneath the earth and those who want to protect the state’s pristine landscape.
The controversy surrounds Bristol Bay in Alaska, one of the most popular commercial fishing spots in the world. The EPA estimates that the area produces roughly half of the world’s population of wild sockeye salmon, an economic boon valued at $300 million in 2009 and a key part of the multibillion-dollar fishing industry. It’s described as the largest fishing spot in the Pacific Ocean.
But the bay also has an abundance of other valuable commodities: gold, silver and copper.
Under a compromise that helped create the Clean Water Act in 1972, the Army Corps of Engineers has responsibility for conducting environmental impact assessments of potential projects — information that the EPA then uses to reach its decisions.
The EPA officials reviewing Pebble project, however, argued that they should decide the project at the outset and not wait for the corps.
Such an approach advocated in the internal emails conflicts with Mr. Obama’s often-stated goal that such decisions be made on scientific merits alone. “Science holds the key to our survival as a planet and our security and prosperity as a nation. It’s time we once again put science at the top of our agenda and worked to restore America’s place as the world leader in science and technology,” the president urged in one of his first radio addresses after winning the 2008 election.
The 2010 presentation prepared for Ms. Jackson, the president’s first EPA chief, laid out “options to influence the project” and produce a veto before the corps completed its environmental assessment.
Officials debated the pros and cons if the EPA rejected the proposal based a section of the Clean Water Act that “authorizes EPA to prohibit, restrict or deny the discharge of dredged or fill material at defined sites in waters of the United States.”
Traditionally waiting until permits were filed and scientific studies were completed would “generate considerable information informing the decision,” the document for Ms. Jackson stated. But officials worried that waiting would risk the EPA being able to veto only the single mine and not prevent any future construction in the region.
EPA officials also identified as a con the fact that proponents of the project would spend “tens of millions of dollars” making the case for the project before the agency could weigh in with its decision.
Many of the concerns identified in the document dealt with politics and process, and not the science.
Story Continues →Flashpoint
But Tom Collier, a Clinton administration official who now serves as CEO of Pebble Partnership that is seeking to build the mine, said there was no legal reason for the EPA to make its decision before the Army Corps of Engineers completed its scientific review and issued an environmental impact report.
“Then EPA has every right under the statute to step in whether they so choose, but at least at that time they’ve got a strong record that’s been developed out of a rigorous, transparent and well-used practice,” he said in an interview.
The Pebble Mine is the latest flashpoint between industries eager to tap Alaska’s rich bounty of minerals, metals and fuels beneath the earth and those who want to protect the state’s pristine landscape.
The controversy surrounds Bristol Bay in Alaska, one of the most popular commercial fishing spots in the world. The EPA estimates that the area produces roughly half of the world’s population of wild sockeye salmon, an economic boon valued at $300 million in 2009 and a key part of the multibillion-dollar fishing industry. It’s described as the largest fishing spot in the Pacific Ocean.
But the bay also has an abundance of other valuable commodities: gold, silver and copper.
Under a compromise that helped create the Clean Water Act in 1972, the Army Corps of Engineers has responsibility for conducting environmental impact assessments of potential projects — information that the EPA then uses to reach its decisions.
The EPA officials reviewing Pebble project, however, argued that they should decide the project at the outset and not wait for the corps.
Such an approach advocated in the internal emails conflicts with Mr. Obama’s often-stated goal that such decisions be made on scientific merits alone. “Science holds the key to our survival as a planet and our security and prosperity as a nation. It’s time we once again put science at the top of our agenda and worked to restore America’s place as the world leader in science and technology,” the president urged in one of his first radio addresses after winning the 2008 election.
The 2010 presentation prepared for Ms. Jackson, the president’s first EPA chief, laid out “options to influence the project” and produce a veto before the corps completed its environmental assessment.
Officials debated the pros and cons if the EPA rejected the proposal based a section of the Clean Water Act that “authorizes EPA to prohibit, restrict or deny the discharge of dredged or fill material at defined sites in waters of the United States.”
Traditionally waiting until permits were filed and scientific studies were completed would “generate considerable information informing the decision,” the document for Ms. Jackson stated. But officials worried that waiting would risk the EPA being able to veto only the single mine and not prevent any future construction in the region.
EPA officials also identified as a con the fact that proponents of the project would spend “tens of millions of dollars” making the case for the project before the agency could weigh in with its decision.
Many of the concerns identified in the document dealt with politics and process, and not the science.
When EPA finally announced it would conduct its own scientific assessment in 2011, it said it had done so at the request of tribes. In fact, EPA officials had long debated the veto before that and reached out to the tribes preemptively, tipping them off that the EPA was considering a preemptive veto.
“We have been discussing 404 (c) quite a bit internally at all levels of EPA,” Mr. North wrote an attorney for a tribal company in August 2010. “This letter will certainly stoke the fire.”
Likewise, EPA officials briefed the conservation group Trout Unlimited, another mine opponent, about its plans.
One of the clearest signs that EPA had predetermined it would kill the project came in the form of a 2011 budget request that sought money to pursue the 404(c) veto.
Officials at other federal agencies with roles in the mining review process were talking as early as 2010 that an EPA veto was a fait accompli.
Mr. North has briefed top EPA officials in Washington and “believes EPA leaders have decided to proceed and they are just deciding when,” Fish and Wildlife Service biologist Phil Brna wrote in an email in September 2010.
An investigation of the timeline could set the stage for legal action by the mine proponents, who argue that the EPA had no reason to pre-empt the normal process and prevent a full scientific review.
Mr. Collier, the CEO of the mine company and a former regulator himself under Clinton Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, scoffs at the rationale that the EPA has used in claiming it was simply trying to protect the environment and local tribes’ fishing livelihoods.
“The best way to determine whether or not that’s the case is to do an environmental impact statement,” he said. “If they’re concerned about this, why won’t they allow the science they’re relying on to go through that process?”
Sen. Lindsey Graham: ‘Scumbags’ in White House lied about Benghazi
Sen. Lindsey Graham: ‘Scumbags’ in White House lied about Benghazi
FILE - In this Sept. 3, 2013 file photo Sen. Lindsey Graham, ... more >
Story Topics
Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday blasted the “scumbags” in the White House who he believes have been “in the tank” in covering up the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2012, terror attacks in Benghazi, Libya.
“Our Democratic friends, for the most part, have been in the tank over Benghazi,” the South Carolina Republican said on Mike Gallagher’s radio show, Mediaite.com reported.
“Some guy said this about me yesterday on the left: The only reason I cared about this was because I have six tea party opponents. Well, if that’s true, I’m the biggest scumbag in America,” he said.
“I don’t think that’s true; I know it’s not true. It would be almost impossible for Lindsey Graham — given who I am and what I’ve been doing for the last 20 years — not to care about those in harm’s way, who get killed, and not go on to hold the administration accountable that lied about it.”
The radio host thanked Mr. Graham for “fighting the good fight” and holding those accountable, to which the senator replied: “The scumbags are the people in the White House who lied about this.”
“Our Democratic friends, for the most part, have been in the tank over Benghazi,” the South Carolina Republican said on Mike Gallagher’s radio show, Mediaite.com reported.
“Some guy said this about me yesterday on the left: The only reason I cared about this was because I have six tea party opponents. Well, if that’s true, I’m the biggest scumbag in America,” he said.
“I don’t think that’s true; I know it’s not true. It would be almost impossible for Lindsey Graham — given who I am and what I’ve been doing for the last 20 years — not to care about those in harm’s way, who get killed, and not go on to hold the administration accountable that lied about it.”
The radio host thanked Mr. Graham for “fighting the good fight” and holding those accountable, to which the senator replied: “The scumbags are the people in the White House who lied about this.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Internal memos reveal EPA worked behind the scenes to kill Alaska mine project
Internal memos reveal EPA worked behind the scenes to kill Alaska mine project
Feb.
21, 2013: Gina McCarthy, then-Assistant Administrator with the
Environmental Protection Agency and current Administrator, holds a
climate change report as she speaks at a climate workshop sponsored by
The Climate Center at Georgetown University.AP
The internal memos published by The Washington Times show EPA officials working behind the scenes as early as 2008 to kill the gold and copper mine project -- two years before any scientific study or survey was conducted looking into the environmental impact.
“As you know I feel that both of these projects (Chuitna and Pebble) merit consideration of a 404C veto,” EPA official Phillip North wrote, according to the emails.
North, according to the Times, pushed to have the mine’s veto added to the agenda of a 2009 agency retreat.
But the EPA announced in 2011there would be a neutral and scientific review of the mining project. At the time, they said that concerns raised by environmental groups and local tribes would be investigated, but that no decision had been made.
“Alaska is a long way from Washington, D.C.,” Rep. James Lankford, R-Okla., told Fox News. “There is no reason for Washington, D.C., to run affairs in Alaska.”
Lankford says the EPA pre-judged the case and didn’t wait for a full scientific review.
“They are to be neutral in this, and they are definitely not neutral in this,” he said.
In a statement Thursday, the EPA said the emails in question were "authored by a low level staffer stationed in Alaska who had no decision making authority for the Agency.
"Additionally, the focus should be on what the agency has actually done which is taking a deliberative approach based on the science. In fact, the agency leadership had not made a decision on whether to proceed to 404(c) action until the scientific analysis was complete," the EPA said.
The newly published emails are just the latest twist in the Pebble Mine saga which began years ago.
Mine opponents have been urging EPA to take steps to protect the region. They say the project would threaten the billion-dollar commercial fishing industry in Bristol Bay and the 14,000 jobs linked to it.
Supporters, including Pebble Limited Partnership, the investment group behind the proposed multi-billion dollar copper and gold mine, accuse the government of using “junk science” to sabotage the deal.
“Rather than allowing the filing of a mining permit application, the EPA employees secretly plotted with environmental activists to undermine the ability of land owners to objectively evaluate and develop the proposed mining of the Pebble deposit … and thereby establishing a precedent that will have long-term harmful impacts on investment and job creation in the United States,” Pebble Partnership wrote in an April 29-dated letter to the EPA.
The letter also accuses the EPA of misusing taxpayer money to “create a flawed, junk science laden report, called the Bristol Bay Assessment, designed to negatively influence government, financial markets, and public policy.”
Pebble Partnership has said the mine deposit is one of the largest of its kind in the world, with the potential of producing 80.6 billion pounds of copper and 107.4 million ounces of gold over decades.
In February, the EPA announced it was taking the first steps toward restricting the development of the mine, citing concern for a premier sockeye salmon fishery in southwest Alaska. The agency employed a rarely used veto process under the Clean Water Act that gives the government the ability to stop or slow the process.
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy told reporters the EPA was working on how it can best use its authorities “to project Bristol Bay rivers, streams and lakes from the damage that will inevitably result from the construction, operation and long-term maintenance of a large-scale copper mine.”
Pebble Partnership CEO Tom Collier called the move an example of government overreach.
He told The Hill this week the project had “become the poster child for an expansion of EPA authority."
While the EPA process is underway, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is prohibited from approving a permit for the project.
Fox News' Chad Pergram contributed to this report.
Syrian Jihadist Group ISIS Takes Over Schools, Flogs Girls For Not Wearing Burqas…
Syrian Jihadist Group ISIS Takes Over Schools, Flogs Girls For Not Wearing Burqas…
Via Al-Shorfa:
Syrian residents living under the rule of the al-Qaeda-inspired “Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant” (ISIL) in al-Raqa suffer “daily oppression” and “crackdown on freedoms”.
With these words Mohammed al-Hallaq described the way he feels living under the rule of al-Qaeda-inspired ISIL in al-Raqa.
Other al-Raqa residents told Al-Shorfa they are barely able to provide daily bread for their families and that ISIL elements are imposing a strict lifestyle on residents which impacts all aspects of life, including education.
Al-Hallaq, a geography and history teacher, told Al-Shorfa that the educated who remain in al-Raqa fear the consequences of the control ISIL is exercising over the education system in the province.
“Some public schools opened their doors under the direct supervision or management of ISIL, and they use ISIL curricula, such as the Islamic School for Outstanding Students, whose students are selected from among the children of mujahideen, muhajireen and supporters, and whose staff of teachers and administrators are known for their full and complete adherence to religion,” he said.
“ISIL did not stop at taking control of school administrations,” he said. “It also conducts near-daily surprise inspections at schools, in particular at girls’ schools, in which women-staffed inspection teams enter school campuses to ensure the girls are dressed in Islamic clothing.”
Girls found in violation of the dress code are often punished with a flogging, a punishment also applied to school administrators for failing to monitor the dress code, al-Hallaq added.
ISIL’s “education committee” closely monitors all teachers working at schools in al-Raqa city and its countryside, arresting any teacher who does not conform to its educational and ideological agendas, he said.
On more than one occasion, al-Hallaq said, he himself has been interrogated about his views.
He also was asked to submit suggestions and comments on modifications to the curricula related to the Crusades and other historical and geographical information to match ISIL views, with special focus on Islamic conquests and the importance of the application of sharia, al-Hallaq added.
The shortfall in teachers, as many of them fled to other areas of the country or left Syria altogether, has thinned the teaching ranks, he said, necessitating the employment of a number of retired teachers.
Keep reading…
Court witnesses testify, eyewitnesses confirm that Pope Francis raped, killed children
Court witnesses testify, eyewitnesses confirm that Pope Francis raped, killed children
Comments 11
- Judy Byington on April 18, 2014 inChild Exploitation
Child Holocausts
Children
Human Trafficking
Investigations
ITCCS
Press Releases
Ritual Abuse
Article was based on today’s exclusive interview with Kevin Annett of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State about this week’s litigation in the Brussels Common Law Court of Justice. Five judges and 27 jury members from six countries including the USA, considered evidence on over 50,000 missing Canadian, US, Argentine and European children who were suspected victims of an international child sacrificial cult referred to as the Ninth Circle.
Two adolescent women claimed that Pope Francis raped them while participating in child sacrifices. Eight eyewitnesses confirmed the allegations according to evidence presented this week at a Brussels Common Law Court of Justice. The Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice rituals were said to take place during the Springs of 2009 and 2010 in rural Holland and Belgium. http://www.salem-news.com/articles/march222014/itccs-case-proceeds.php
Pope Francis was also a perpetrator in satanic child sacrifice rites while acting as an Argentine priest and Bishop according to records obtained from the Vatican archives. A prominent Vatican official and former Vatican Curia employee obtained the sealed documents for use by the court. This was not the first time satanic activities were suspected to be at the Vatican according to this ABC news story. http://abcnews.go.com/Travel/chief-exorcist-rev-gabriele-amorth-devil-vatican/story?id=10073040
Another witness was set to testify that they were present during Pope Francis’ meetings with the military Junta during Argentine’s 1970′s Dirty War. According to the witness, Pope Francis helped traffic children of missing political prisoners into an international child exploitation ring run by an office at the Vatican.
Evidence of a Catholic Jesuit Order document called the “Magisterial Privilege” was presented in court by the Chief Prosecutor. The record dated Dec. 25 1967 was said to show that every new Pope was required to participate in Ninth Circle Satanic ritual sacrifices of newborn children, including drinking their blood.
“Documents from Vatican secret archives presented to court clearly indicate that for centuries the Jesuits had a premeditated plan to ritually murder kidnapped newborn babies and then consume their blood,” the Chief Prosecutor told the five international judges and 27 jury members. “The plan was born of a twisted notion to derive spiritual power from the lifeblood of the innocent, thereby assuring political stability of the Papacy in Rome. These acts are not only genocidal but systemic and institutionalized in nature. Since at least 1773, they appear to have been performed by the Roman Catholic Church, Jesuits and every Pope.”
Two witnesses claimed that as children they were at child sacrifices with the former Pope Joseph Ratzinger. Since at least 1962 Ratzinger participated in child sacrifices as a member of the Knights of Darkness according to the Vatican records presented at court. Ratzinger was an S.S. Chaplain’s assistant at the German Ravensbruck Concentration Camp during World War II. The children to be killed were supplied from prisoners at the death camp. The Nazi Waffen S.S. Division Knights of Darkness was established by Hitler in 1933 and embraced ancient pagan occult beliefs in human sacrifice.
Dutch Therapist-ritual abuse survivor Toos Nijenhuis testified of her witness to child sacrifice in this video. “Survivors of these rituals describe newborn babies being chopped to pieces on stone altars and their remains consumed by participants” the Chief Prosecutor said.”During the 1960′s the survivor-witnesses were forced to rape and mutilate other children and then cut their throats with ceremonial daggers.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A1o1Egi20c
According to witnesses Pope Francis, former Pope Joseph Ratzinger, Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Pachon and Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby were participants in the Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice cult rape and killing of children. Evidence also could link to cult ceremonies UK High Court Justice Judge Fulford, members of the British Royal Family including Prince Phillip, Dutch Cardinal Alfrink, Dutch Queen Wilhemina, her family and consort King Hendrick, Belgian Royals and Bilderberger founder Crown Prince Bernhard.
Documentation of The Canada Gazette Issue No. 232, December 26 1942, Ottawa was also presented to court. Evidently and unfortunately, the Canadian government and Privy Council Office in London granted to the Dutch royals, exception from all criminal, civil and military jurisdiction. What would make these global leaders exempt from justice?
The Chief Prosecutor presented alleged links between the British, Dutch and Belgian royal families to disappearances of Mohawk children at Canada’s Church of England’s Brantford Ontario Indian residential school. In 2008 a child mass gravesite was discovered at the Mohawk School. An ITCCS dig by archeologists was shut down when remains of a small child was uncovered.
Since then over 30 child mass grave sites have been located at Indian residential schools across Canada. The Catholic and Anglican Churches, United Church of Canada, Canadian government and Crown of England have refused ITCCS’ repeated requests for excavation of the mass grave sites. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/04/15/496538/-28-Mass-graves-of-Indian-Children-in-Canada#
“This week conclusive evidence was presented that the Catholic Church is perpetrating ongoing crimes against children,” the Chief Prosecutor stated. “The Catholic Church is the world’s largest corporation and appears to be in collusion with governments, police and courts worldwide.”
The Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice cult was said to operate at Roman Catholic cathedrals in Montreal, New York, Rome and London according to evidence filed in court. Witnesses claimed child sacrifices took place at Carnarvon Castle in Wales, an undisclosed French Chateau and at Canadian Catholic and Anglican Indian residential schools in Kamloops, British Columbia and Brantford, Ontario. The Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice cult was believed to use privately owned forest groves in the US, Canada, France and Holland.
Yesterday the five international magistrates adjourned court for two weeks and considered continuing in closed sessions. This week’s closed court was held in an undisclosed location due to notification that the Vatican had released a Jesuit “hit squad” to disrupt proceedings.
FOX reported double listing in VA, whistle blower doctor reports some veterans died due to lack of care. If you are a veteran and you were denied care at VA, e-mail me at orly.taitz@hushmail.com. If you don’t hear back in 24 hours, call 949-683-5411
FOX reported double listing in VA, whistle blower doctor reports some veterans died due to lack of care. If you are a veteran and you were denied care at VA, e-mail me at orly.taitz@hushmail.com. If you don’t hear back in 24 hours, call 949-683-5411
Posted on | April 29, 2014 | 7 Comments
This
is more than outrage, this is reckless behavior, this is depraved heart
behavior and possibly manslaughter. Hannity reported yesterday that a
retired Walter Reid medical doctor, a whistle blower, disclosed that VA,
particularly Walter Reid hospital, had a double list. Veterans are
assured care within 2 weeks, however it was reported that veterans , who
had cancer and were bleeding, were denied care for months and they
passed away. Walter Reid did not enter their names on the list of
patients awaiting care for months, not until they were hospitalized, at
which point it was too late to provide them with care.If you are a veteran and you were denied care at VA, e-mail me at orly.taitz@hushmail.com. If you don’t hear back in 24 hours, call 949-683-5411.
I believe that the reason there is such a repugnant treatment of veterans, is because the regime is afraid of them, they are the most likely to go after our corrupt establishment. The veterans saw mayhem and death, they are not afraid to fight and they are not afraid to die fighting the regime. That is why Obama administration placed veterans on the list of potential domestic terrorists and that is why the regime is afraid of them. We are seeing the salaries and benefits of the members of the military going down, veterans not getting proper medical care.
I looked in the Russian media. While there are plenty of problems there as well, I was stricken by the contrast. I saw 2 articles, which stated that in 2013 25,000 veterans got free condominiums paid by their Department of Defense, many are getting their current homes repaired and remodeled and it is being paid by their DOD. The article is saying also that WW2 vets are all scheduled to have new condominiums by 2015 and they and their families are scheduled to have full medical check ups to see if they need any medical care. The ones who cannot go to the hospital for their check up, will be checked by a doctor at their residence. (I posted the article below, you can use Google or other translator program to read it). Again, the condominiums that they are getting in Russia are probably smaller than the average condominiums or houses in the US, the level of their medical care might not be as good as in the US, but it shows that the leadership shows respect for the veterans and members of the military. We need a new leadership in the US, where the President and the Congress do not see the US veterans as an enemy and as domestic terrorists.
Новости
Is tomorrow the D-Day in Ukraine? Russian intelligence claims that a massive attack is scheduled by Ukraine in the East? Will Putin use this alleged intelligence for his own attack or counter attack?
Is tomorrow the D-Day in Ukraine? Russian intelligence claims that a massive attack is scheduled by Ukraine in the East? Will Putin use this alleged intelligence for his own attack or counter attack?
Posted on | May 1, 2014 | No Comments
Источник сообщил о предполагаемом штурме 2 мая на юго-востоке УкраиныРуководство
спецоперацией на востоке Украины перешло от главы МВД к главе СБУ,
сообщил источник в Генштабе Вооруженных сил Украины.4 ЧАСА НАЗАД
Здание облпрокуратуры в Донецке перешло под контроль митингующих14 МИНУТ НАЗАД
В Донецкой области захвачен лидер местной организации «Свободы»4 ЧАСА НАЗАД
Michael Savage, talk show hos with 11 million listeners: Obama should be arrested for sedition when he comes back to America
Michael Savage, talk show hos with 11 million listeners: Obama should be arrested for sedition when he comes back to America
Posted on | May 1, 2014 | 2 Comments
Obama should be arrested for sedition
when he comes back to America
Welcome to The Michael Savage Newsletter, your daily insider report on all things “Savage.”In today’s issue: Once again, President Obama is on one of his overseas “apology tours,” this time equating America’s human rights record with that of the Muslim regime in Malaysia.
“I can’t wait until this man is gone from office,” said a disgusted Dr. Savage.
“Obama is on his apology tour of the world for the sixth straight year,” Savage said to his audience, adding:
He just went to Malaysia, which has one of the worst human rights records in the world, and he put America down again.
Obama should be arrested for sedition when he arrives back in America.
He goes to despotic Muslim nations and puts this great nation down. It’s disgusting.
I can’t wait until he’s gone from office.
I can’t stand it one more day.
Obama is an embarrassment to America.
If you’re a psycho lib who hates the country, of course you feel good when he spits on this country every time he goes out of town.
What about the red-blooded American who’s sick and tired of this backstabbing administration?
Rep. Darrell Issa: “The American People Have Learned You Cannot Believe This White House. You Cannot Believe This President” (Video)
Rep. Darrell Issa: “The American People Have Learned You Cannot Believe This White House. You Cannot Believe This President” (Video)
Posted on | May 1, 2014 | 10 Comments
Rep. Darrell Issa: “The American People Have Learned You Cannot Believe This White House. You Cannot Believe This President” (Video)
Ukrainian president orders military draft, Russian army is at the border, NATO conducting exercises, we are inching towards WW3
Ukrainian president orders military draft, Russian army is at the border, NATO conducting exercises, we are inching towards WW3
Posted on | May 1, 2014 | 2 Comments
Putin wants troops out of Ukraine’s east
DONETSK,
Ukraine (AP) — Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday that
Ukraine should withdraw its military units from the eastern and southern
regions of the country, where anti-government insurgents are seizing
buildings, but hours later, Ukraine’s acting president ordered the
military draft…
Associated Press
only 2.5 million paid their first premium and actually bought Obamacare. 6.5 million, three times more people lost their insurance because of Obamacare
only 2.5 million paid their first premium and actually bought Obamacare. 6.5 million, three times more people lost their insurance because of Obamacare
Posted on | May 1, 2014 | No Comments
http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/01/report-just-2-4-million-healthcare-gov-customers-paid-their-first-premium/Report:
Just 2.4 Million HealthCare.gov Customers Paid Their First
Premium05/01/2014 – Sarah HurtubiseJust 67 percent of Obamacare
enrollees in federally-run marketplaces had paid their premiums by April
15, bringing the federally-run Obamacare enrollment tally to only 2.45
million, according to documents provided to the House Energy and
Commerce Committee.The Obama administration has been heavily promoting
that 8 million Americans selected plans on Obamacare marketplaces, but
has refused to release any data on how many purchased their
plans.According to all 160 insurers participating in the federal
exchanges, just 2.45 million people paid their first month’s premium by
April 15. That accounts for 36 states, although high-enrollment
state-run Obamacare exchanges — like California with its 1.4 million
sign-ups — aren’t included.The 67 percent payment rate as of April 15 is
markedly lower than the 80-85 percent that experts have predicted will
end up paying their premiums. April 30 is the final day for most federal
exchange customers to make their payments.Of those who have paid their
premiums, just 25 percent fall within the highly desired young
invincible range from age 18 to 34 — drastically lower than the
administration’s minimum goal of 39 percent needed to avoid premium
hikes next year.The House committee compiled the data from insurance
providers participating in the federally-run exchanges through
HealthCare.gov, after requesting the information in early March. Members
will ask insurers to update the payment data by May 20 to include full
payments through April 30.“In a sad reversal away from its vows of
transparency, the Obama administration, from inside the Oval Office on
down, has gone to extraordinary lengths to keep basic details of the
health care law from the public,” said Michigan Republican Rep. Fred
Upton, chairman of the committee. “Tired of receiving incomplete
pictures of enrollment in the health care law, we went right to the
source and found that the administration’s recent declarations of
success may be unfounded.”The Obama administration has been touting
exchanges’ 8 million sign-ups far and wide, but have come under fire for
refusing to release any data on the number of Americans that have
actually paid for their health care plans. The enrollment data
frequently touted by the White House includes anyone who selected a
health care plan via an Obamacare exchange — similar to putting a
product in a shopping cart on a website, but not purchasing it.Read
more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/01/report-just-2-4-million-healthcare-gov-customers-paid-their-first-premium/#ixzz30VQ43oJ4
Sharia Brunei: ‘Stone the gays’ law to be phased in starting today
Sharia Brunei: ‘Stone the gays’ law to be phased in starting today
Yet
gay advocates in the U.S. such as Theresa Sparks and Chris Stedman
attacked Pamela Geller and me for calling attention to the
institutionalized mistreatment of gays under Islamic law. Their gay
advocacy doesn’t extend to standing up to Sharia oppression of gays,
even though that oppression is far more virulent and violent than
anything from “right-wing extremists” in the U.S. And you can’t blame
them: given the Leftist/jihadist alliance, it’s clear that if they spoke
out against Sharia mistreatment of gays, they would no longer be
invited to the best parties, and might even be branded as “right-wing.”
Their moral cowardice and duplicity, however, are obvious.“Brunei: ‘Stone the gays’ law to be phased in from tomorrow,” Pink News, April 30, 2014 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
The Sultan of Brunei has confirmed that a law calling for homosexuals to be stoned to death will be phased in from tomorrow.Watch it, Colville. You’re veering perilously toward “Islamophobia.”
The law was announced earlier this month, and replaces the maximum ten-year prison sentence for homosexuality with death by stoning.
It was condemned by the UN, and a host of celebrities including Stephen Fry, Ellen DeGeneres and Sharon Osbourne, who targeted the Brunei-owned Dorchester Collection for boycotts.
The sweeping law was initially due to come into effect on April 22, but was postponed due to ‘unforeseen circumstances’.
Despite the delays, the Sultan today confirmed the law, which will apply to both Muslims and non-Muslims, will be phased in over a two-year period from tomorrow.
He said: “Today, I place my faith in and am grateful to Allah the almighty to announce that tomorrow, Thursday 1 May 2014, will see the enforcement of Sharia law phase one, to be followed by the other phases.”
According to the Brunei Times, the first phase of the sweeping law will increase fines and prison sentences for various crimes.
Phase two, which restores corporal punishment including amputations for thieves, will come into effect within 12 months, and phase three, which introduces the death penalty, will come into effect within 24 months.
Under the law, the death penalty can be applied for rape, adultery, sodomy, extramarital sexual relations for Muslims, insulting any verses of the Quran and Hadith, blasphemy, declaring oneself a prophet or non-Muslim, and murder.
UN Spokesman Rupert Colville said: “Application of the death penalty for such a broad range of offenses contravenes international law.”
“Under international law, stoning people to death constitutes torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and is thus clearly prohibited.”
Canada: Muslim accused of conspiring to kill Americans and supporting jihad group
Canada: Muslim accused of conspiring to kill Americans and supporting jihad group
There are two choices: either this endless parade of Muslims conspiring to murder Americans represents a jihad of massive proportions, or the American government is so evil and Islamophobic that it continues to frame innocent Muslims on trumped-up charges to justify the massive expenditures of the “war on terror.” Judging from Barack Obama’s behavior, the former seems much more likely.
“Edmonton man facing terrorism charges in court to fight extradition,”The Canadian Press May 1, 2014:
A lawyer for Sayfildin Tahir Sharif (SAY’-fill-din TA’-here SHAW’-reef) is appearing before the Appeal Court in Edmonton today.
A lower court ruled in 2012 that there was enough evidence to extradite the Sharif [sic] to New York.
Last summer, the federal justice minister order his extradition.
Sharif is appealing both decisions.
He is accused of conspiracy to kill Americans and of supporting a terror group that took part in a suicide bombing in his native Iraq in 2009.
Five U.S. soldiers were killed when a truck filled with explosives was detonated at a military checkpoint.
Sharif, who also goes by the name Faruq Khalil Muhammad Isa, is an ethnic Kurd who was born in Iraq but moved to Toronto as a refugee in 1993. Four years later, he became a Canadian citizen.
In 2011, he was arrested at an Edmonton apartment, where he lived with his girlfriend and her children.
A Crown prosecutor had argued that intercepted phone and Internet conversations showed Sharif helped jihadists contact members of a terrorist network as they made their way from Tunisia to Iraq to make the attacks.
Sharif’s lawyer, Bob Aloneissi, earlier told court that there is no clear evidence that proves Sharif helped a terrorist group or that he agreed to kill anyone. He argued the Crown’s case was based on police interpretations of vague statements by Sharif that were translated from Arabic.
Sharif said the allegations against him came from people who were tortured by American investigators. Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Adam Germain ruled Sharif’s claims were heresay.
The judge called the recorded calls and emails “chilling.”
Court heard about one email between Sharif and another terror suspect who was “preparing for a one-way journey to death.” The pair discussed the number of virgins the man would get in heaven.
The Jihadist Cleansing of Christianity from Muslim Countries
The Jihadist Cleansing of Christianity from Muslim Countries
December 25, 2013 by 77 Comments
To order Robert Spencer’s pamphlet, “Islam: Religion of Bigots,” click here.
Fox News reported that in Iraq, “Christians are afraid to put up a Christmas tree or other decorations, according to one Christian pastor in Iraq. Such displays of faith in an increasingly extremist nation can bring threats and violence, say human rights groups. Christian churches must be regularly guarded, but congregants are even more on edge during their holiest days.”
And in Nigeria, according to Reuters, “fearing attacks by Islamist militant group Boko Haram over Christmas, Nigerian police said on Sunday they had ordered extra patrols, surveillance and covert operations to better secure potential targets during the festive period. The militants have struck every Christmas for the past three years, most dramatically in 2011, when they bombed three churches. One of them, on St. Theresa Catholic Church in Madalla, on the edge of Abuja, killed 37 people and wounded 57.”
Likewise in Indonesia, Reuters reported that President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono “has ordered police to step up security around churches over the Christmas holidays following reports of possible attacks.”
Meanwhile, Xinhua reported that last Saturday, “Syria’s armed rebels fired multiple mortar shells on a church in Syria’s southern province of Daraa, killing 12 people and injuring many others.” Melkite Greek Catholic Patriarch Gregory III Laham “told Xinhua in an interview that Syria’s long-term crisis has displaced more than 450,000 Christian Syrians and killed more than a thousand of them.” IB Times reported Thursday that in the Central African Republic, Muslims recently murdered Christians wholesale, “killing nearly 1,000 men over a two-day period and systematically looting civilian homes.”
Chaldean Catholic Patriarch Louis Sako recently said that Iraqi officials were readily giving Christians visas to leave the country, saying that there was “a whole strategy to help Christians leave Iraq” and warning: “The Middle East is going to empty of Christians.”
David Curry, president and CEO of Open Doors USA, an organization dedicated to defending persecuted Christians worldwide, agreed, saying: “We’re deeply concerned that Christianity is being squeezed out to extinction maybe in the next decade or so in the Middle East.” He explained: “There’s a culture of fear that has developed there that makes it hard for people to want to go to church to express their faith, especially at the holiday season.”
Curry ascribed this “culture of fear” to the negative influence of “extremists”: “These extremist groups desire religious cleansing and they’re increasing in number particularly in northern Iraq….Some of these countries, especially Iraq, have environments that are very hostile because of extremists in the region.”
Nor is Fox the only one guilty of this criminal silence. Steven B. Nasatir, president of the Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, in the Washington Post in October compared the persecution of Christians to Kristallnacht, without ever naming who exactly was doing the persecuting. Everyone knew who perpetrated Kristallnacht, and why they did it, and Steven B. Nasatir, I am sure, knows full well who is persecuting Christians today. He may even know why despite ubiquitous attempts to cover up the reasons, but in his entire piece he fastidiously avoids mentioning who is behind the persecution.
This sort of thing can be expected from the egregiously compromised Washington Post, but it does raise a question: how does Steven B. Nasatir, and the WaPo for that matter, propose to combat this persecution if we are not even allowed to name the persecutors? How can we combat an enemy we cannot even name?
The problem is wider still. Patriarch Gregory recently said plaintively: “I do not understand why the world does not raise its voice against such acts of brutality.” Yet he need not have looked far for the answer: all too many of his brother clerics in the West think that to discuss the plight of Christians in the Middle East would be in poor taste, and perhaps even “Islamophobic.” Robert McManus, the Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester, Massachusetts, articulated the prevailing sentiment last February: “Talk about extreme, militant Islamists and the atrocities that they have perpetrated globally,” he wrote, “might undercut the positive achievements that we Catholics have attained in our inter-religious dialogue with devout Muslims.”
So we must keep silent about Muslim persecution of Christians so as to avoid offending the peaceful Muslims in the U.S. with whom we are in dialogue, and who presumably would be offended by a discussion of that persecution even though they ostensibly repudiate and denounce it. And apparently the “positive of achievements” of this “inter-religious dialogue with devout Muslims” have not, throughout the course of 2013, done a single thing to ease the plight of the Christians suffering in Muslim lands – and the silence of Bishop McManus and others like him about the Muslim persecution of Christians has arguably made the situation of Middle Eastern Christians even worse, for their persecutors know that there is no one who cares, no one who will dare to speak up for their victims.
Barack Obama, for his part, is no help. He has made only occasional, brief and perfunctory references to the Muslim persecution of Christians – in stark contrast to his solicitude for the Muslims battling Buddhists in Burma, and for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, despite its dismal record of targeting Christians and burning churches, blaming the Christians for its having been toppled from power in a popular uprising last summer.
And so Christians are being harassed, discriminated against, physically menaced, exiled, and killed in Muslim countries the world over, and no one cares. Indeed, anyone who does dare raise concern about their plight and dare to identify their persecutors will be tarred as an “Islamophobe” and a “bigot” and vilified accordingly, while the Right runs for cover and shuns the “controversial” speaker.
Thus the one thing we can be certain of at Christmas 2013 and into the new year is that Islamic jihadists will kill more Christians. And there is one other certainty as well: no one will care.
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)