Connect With Us on Twitter
Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.
Sunday, January 5, 2014
well now i protest
no more news comes out of me intill i get my twitter page back
evem joy my last post
i will go play with lady gaga \
have fun people twitter suspended my page
they wont give it back
fight obama by your selfs
evem joy my last post
i will go play with lady gaga \
have fun people twitter suspended my page
they wont give it back
fight obama by your selfs
Obama Proposes Executive Orders For Backdoor Gun Confiscation
Obama Proposes Executive Orders For Backdoor Gun Confiscation
Obama moves to restrict gun rights through medical tyranny
(Info Wars) – The Obama Administration announced two new executive orders on gun control Friday, after countless other attempts to erode Second Amendment rights failed to gain public support.
According to one of the proposed actions, patient privacy laws would be pushed aside to allow increased government access to mental health records. Currently required to protect that information, states would now be exempt, instead encouraged to submit a patient’s private records into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS).
FAX BLAST SPECIAL: Don’t Let The Government Take Your Guns! Protect Your Second Amendment Rights!
A second proposal from the Department of Justice would “clarify” who is barred from owning firearms, which would include anyone involuntarily committed to an inpatient or outpatient mental institution. In an attempt to diminish concern, the administration claims that seeking help for mental issues does not prohibit a person from firearm ownership.
“The proposed rule will not change the fact that seeking help for mental health problems or getting treatment does not make someone legally prohibited from having a firearm,” the statement said.
Unfortunately, even without the executive orders currently applied, the government has already deceptively used this exact tactic to revoke legitimate gun ownership without due process, an issue that will undoubtedly increase.
In 2012, Afghanistan and Iraq veteran Brandon Raub had his firearms confiscated after being involuntarily detained for psychiatric questioning due to Facebook comments on government corruption. According to Raub’s lawyer John Whitehead, more than 20 others had recently been detained and declared mentally defective in the same Virginia county as well, with thousands more across the country.
That same year, David Sarti, best known for his appearance on National Geographic’s Doomsday Preppers,was committed to a psychiatric ward and deemed “mentally defective” after complaining to his doctor about chest pains. Declining to have tubes inserted into his heart by cardiologists, doctors claimed Sarti was suicidal, prompting the FBI to revoke his Second Amendment right.
The targeting of veterans specifically is quite clear. A collaborative study from 2007 between the VA Medical Center and the Archives of Internal Medicine claimed that at least 1/3rd of returning veterans were mentally ill.
With almost every human emotion now being labeled a mental illness by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the attack on gun rights through the medical system will only worsen.
An amendment in a 2012 defense bill spearheaded by Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer attempted to collect the names of veterans deemed too mentally incompetent to handle their finances. The list would thenadmittedly be handed over to the NICS, removing the gun rights of all listed veterans without due process.
Just last year, countless veterans began receiving a letter from the Veterans Administration warning that their mental health was suddenly under review. The letter continued by saying that the right to own weapons would be removed if bureaucrats deemed them “incompetent” outside of law.
Given the Obama Administration’s view toward returning military, the assault on veterans is unsurprising. In fact, a 2009 Homeland Security report labeled returning veterans as likely domestic terrorists. Despite the outrageous claim, former DHS chief Janet Napolitano defended the report. Incredibly, the DHS announced that Boy Scout Explorers were being trained to kill “disgruntled Iraq war veterans” in a New York Times pieceonly one month later.
Despite the endless denials of gun confiscation, California residents were greeted by Justice Department agents last year as the state expanded its confiscation program. Lynette Phillips, who had been involuntarily held in a mental hospital after her nurse exaggerated the severity of her condition, had her and her husband’s firearms removed forcibly from their home.
Following the passage of the NY SAFE Act, New York residents began receiving letters telling them to turn in their firearms and permits as well. One legal gun owner had his firearms taken after a provision in the law allowed his medical records, which detailed his prescriptions, to be shared with authorities.
The media and administration’s failure to mention these countless abuses, justified through accessing mental health records, paints a clear picture of how these executive orders would be carried out. Masquerading as a mental health fix, the same system that has pushed dangerous prescription drugs for decades is now using it against law-abiding Americans.
In an ironic and telling move, a Pennsylvania court recently ruled that a state trooper who was previously hospitalized for depression would not be allowed to own a firearm “off-duty.” Regardless if the officer was an actual danger, the court ruled that due to his likely mental illness, he would only be allowed to carry a firearm “on duty,” showing how government is not subjected to the same rules as citizens.
Early last year, President Obama proposed 23 executive actions on gun control as well, pushing healthcare providers to ask their patients whether they own firearms. Given that law abiding gun owners are already being targeted over trivial medical conditions, the proposals would only increase their occurrence.
Despite gun homicide seeing a 49 percent drop since 1993, the establishment has continued to ignore facts with its attempt to push gun control.
The same Justice Department willing to give guns to drug cartels in order to justify gun control through Fast and Furious is now attempting to lecture the public on gun safety, unsurprising given Attorney General Eric Holder’s comments on “brainwashing” the public to be anti-gun.
With the attack on the Second Amendment already beginning this new year, will 2014 be the year of gun confiscation or the year of revival?
http://www.infowars.com/obama-proposes-executive-orders-for-backdoor-gun-confiscation/
(Info Wars) – The Obama Administration announced two new executive orders on gun control Friday, after countless other attempts to erode Second Amendment rights failed to gain public support.
According to one of the proposed actions, patient privacy laws would be pushed aside to allow increased government access to mental health records. Currently required to protect that information, states would now be exempt, instead encouraged to submit a patient’s private records into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS).
FAX BLAST SPECIAL: Don’t Let The Government Take Your Guns! Protect Your Second Amendment Rights!
A second proposal from the Department of Justice would “clarify” who is barred from owning firearms, which would include anyone involuntarily committed to an inpatient or outpatient mental institution. In an attempt to diminish concern, the administration claims that seeking help for mental issues does not prohibit a person from firearm ownership.
“The proposed rule will not change the fact that seeking help for mental health problems or getting treatment does not make someone legally prohibited from having a firearm,” the statement said.
Unfortunately, even without the executive orders currently applied, the government has already deceptively used this exact tactic to revoke legitimate gun ownership without due process, an issue that will undoubtedly increase.
In 2012, Afghanistan and Iraq veteran Brandon Raub had his firearms confiscated after being involuntarily detained for psychiatric questioning due to Facebook comments on government corruption. According to Raub’s lawyer John Whitehead, more than 20 others had recently been detained and declared mentally defective in the same Virginia county as well, with thousands more across the country.
That same year, David Sarti, best known for his appearance on National Geographic’s Doomsday Preppers,was committed to a psychiatric ward and deemed “mentally defective” after complaining to his doctor about chest pains. Declining to have tubes inserted into his heart by cardiologists, doctors claimed Sarti was suicidal, prompting the FBI to revoke his Second Amendment right.
The targeting of veterans specifically is quite clear. A collaborative study from 2007 between the VA Medical Center and the Archives of Internal Medicine claimed that at least 1/3rd of returning veterans were mentally ill.
With almost every human emotion now being labeled a mental illness by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the attack on gun rights through the medical system will only worsen.
An amendment in a 2012 defense bill spearheaded by Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer attempted to collect the names of veterans deemed too mentally incompetent to handle their finances. The list would thenadmittedly be handed over to the NICS, removing the gun rights of all listed veterans without due process.
Just last year, countless veterans began receiving a letter from the Veterans Administration warning that their mental health was suddenly under review. The letter continued by saying that the right to own weapons would be removed if bureaucrats deemed them “incompetent” outside of law.
Given the Obama Administration’s view toward returning military, the assault on veterans is unsurprising. In fact, a 2009 Homeland Security report labeled returning veterans as likely domestic terrorists. Despite the outrageous claim, former DHS chief Janet Napolitano defended the report. Incredibly, the DHS announced that Boy Scout Explorers were being trained to kill “disgruntled Iraq war veterans” in a New York Times pieceonly one month later.
Despite the endless denials of gun confiscation, California residents were greeted by Justice Department agents last year as the state expanded its confiscation program. Lynette Phillips, who had been involuntarily held in a mental hospital after her nurse exaggerated the severity of her condition, had her and her husband’s firearms removed forcibly from their home.
Following the passage of the NY SAFE Act, New York residents began receiving letters telling them to turn in their firearms and permits as well. One legal gun owner had his firearms taken after a provision in the law allowed his medical records, which detailed his prescriptions, to be shared with authorities.
The media and administration’s failure to mention these countless abuses, justified through accessing mental health records, paints a clear picture of how these executive orders would be carried out. Masquerading as a mental health fix, the same system that has pushed dangerous prescription drugs for decades is now using it against law-abiding Americans.
In an ironic and telling move, a Pennsylvania court recently ruled that a state trooper who was previously hospitalized for depression would not be allowed to own a firearm “off-duty.” Regardless if the officer was an actual danger, the court ruled that due to his likely mental illness, he would only be allowed to carry a firearm “on duty,” showing how government is not subjected to the same rules as citizens.
Early last year, President Obama proposed 23 executive actions on gun control as well, pushing healthcare providers to ask their patients whether they own firearms. Given that law abiding gun owners are already being targeted over trivial medical conditions, the proposals would only increase their occurrence.
Despite gun homicide seeing a 49 percent drop since 1993, the establishment has continued to ignore facts with its attempt to push gun control.
The same Justice Department willing to give guns to drug cartels in order to justify gun control through Fast and Furious is now attempting to lecture the public on gun safety, unsurprising given Attorney General Eric Holder’s comments on “brainwashing” the public to be anti-gun.
With the attack on the Second Amendment already beginning this new year, will 2014 be the year of gun confiscation or the year of revival?
http://www.infowars.com/obama-proposes-executive-orders-for-backdoor-gun-confiscation/
Please help us stay spam-free. Mouse over a spam post and click the X to report spam.
Would-be suicide bomber among SEVEN dangerous Al-Qaeda suspects to be freed from curfew within days
Would-be suicide bomber among SEVEN dangerous Al-Qaeda suspects to be freed from curfew within days
- Suspects monitored by electronic tags and curfews to be freed this month
- Two of the men are accused of plotting to blow up transatlantic flights
- One attended camp with those behind failed 2005 London bombings
- The seven unnamed men were placed under monitoring in 2012
- Curbs only last two years unless suspects have engaged in 'new' terrorist-related activity
|
Seven dangerous Al-Qaeda suspects are to be freed from Government curfews and able to walk the streets within days, it has emerged.
The men, some of whom are suspected of plotting to kill thousands on transatlantic airliners, will no longer be bound by electronic tags or curfew restrictions after the terrorism prevention orders are lifted.
The measures were introduced in 2012 to replace Labour government rules which, according to the Liberal Democrats, undermined the suspects' human rights.
However they only last two years unless the government can prove the suspects have engaged in 'new' terrorist-related activity.
Mohammed Ahmed Mohamed vanished after cutting off his electronic tag and disguising himself in a burqa
Officials say such proof is hard if not impossible to come by as the men, who have not been named, know their behavior is being monitored.
Under the curbs, suspects are required to stay at home for up to 10 hours each night, wear electronic tags and are banned from certain places.
Among the seven due to be freed this month is a would-be suicide bomber known only by his initials, AM.
The Sunday Times reports the 26-year-old was involved in what investigators called 'Operation Overt', a plot to attack flights from London to America in 2006.
Another is, BF, a former train driver who was part of a group of British extremists seeking terrorist training in Pakistan.
Among the men who are due to be freed is one who
attended a training camp with the men behind the failed London 2005
bombings (pictured)
The whereabouts of two suspects is unknown, including that of Mohammed Ahmed Mohamed who cut off his electric tag while visiting a mosque last November.
A senior Whitehall security official confirmed the men would be released over the next month.
MI5, the police and the Home Office has been working together to decide what action to take once the men are freed.
'We've been planning how to mitigate the risks,' said a security offiIcial.
The Home Office said it had 'tailored plans' to manage the risk, adding: 'These plans, similar to those put in place for the release of prisoners who had served their sentenced, are under constant review.'
Iraqis Make Gains Against Militants in Key City
Iraqis Make Gains Against Militants in Key City
Associated Press
Gunmen patrolled after clashes in Falluja on Sunday. Qaeda-linked militants appear to maintain control of much of the city.
By YASIR GHAZI and TIM ARANGO
Published: January 5, 2014
BAGHDAD — Iraqi security forces and their tribal allies made gains in
heavy fighting on Sunday in Ramadi, reclaiming parts of the city from
Sunni militants aligned with Al Qaeda, security officials and tribal
leaders said.
Related
-
Qaeda-Linked Militants in Iraq Secure Nearly Full Control of Falluja (January 5, 2014)
-
Power Vacuum in Middle East Lifts Militants (January 5, 2014)
But the insurgents appeared to maintain control of much of Falluja,
another important city in Anbar Province, and had the upper hand in
fighting on its outskirts. The government’s efforts to retake Falluja
were set back by the apparent defection of some tribal militias, who are
now siding with the Qaeda-linked militants, according to officials.
The fight in Falluja is complicated by the widespread disenchantment of
Sunnis in Iraq toward the policies of the Shiite-dominated government of
Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki. Some armed tribesmen with little
sympathy for Al Qaeda and its desire to set up a Sunni Islamic state in
Iraq have now apparently decided that the government is their greater
enemy.
Shifting and unclear alliances among the fighting groups in Falluja have
made the situation there more uncertain at a moment when security
officials in Baghdad have promised a decisive campaign to clear the
province of insurgents. Many of the militants in Anbar are members of
the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, a Qaeda-affiliated group
that is also among the fiercest combatants in the Syrian civil war.
The Qaeda-linked fighters “are the most dangerous players in the
region,” Secretary of State John Kerry said Sunday at a news conference
in Jerusalem.
He said the United States had been in contact with Sunni tribal leaders
in Anbar and with the Iraqi government, and would “do everything that is
possible to help them.” But he added: “We’re not contemplating putting
boots on the ground. This is their fight, but we’re going to help them
in their fight.”
American forces in Iraq had success against Al Qaeda in 2006 and 2007 by
allying with the Sunni tribes, and American officials have been
encouraging the Maliki government and the tribes to join forces. But the
government has had fraught relations with the Sunni population in Anbar
in recent years, though it sent $18 million last week to support the
tribes, an American official said.
The fighting in Ramadi on Sunday left dozens of militants dead,
according to a police official in Anbar. Other officials said that 18
civilians were killed in fighting across the province and that 32 others
were wounded.
There was also bloodshed in other parts of Iraq far from Anbar. Several
explosions struck neighborhoods in Baghdad, killing at least 22 people,
officials said. The deadliest episode was a coordinated attack that
struck cafes and restaurants in Shaab, a neighborhood in north Baghdad,
killing 11 people and wounding nearly 30 others.
Six truck drivers were killed in Diyala Province on Saturday night when
they were stopped at an illegal checkpoint staffed by militants dressed
in military uniforms, which are easily bought in shops in Baghdad and
are commonly used by insurgents.
The Iraqi military mounted several airstrikes on Sunday, including one
against a military base occupied by militants in Karma, a town between
Ramadi and Falluja. An Iraqi state television channel said 35 militants
were killed in that strike.
Violence has steadily increased in Iraq over the two years since
American troops left the country. More than 8,000 Iraqis were killed
last year, according to the United Nations, the most in at least five
years. The resurgence of Al Qaeda’s Iraq affiliate is underscored by the
insurgents’ capture of Falluja, and the group has made gains in other
areas of the country.
On Sunday, Antony Blinken, President Obama’s deputy national security
adviser, spoke with Falah al-Fayyad, Iraq’s national security adviser.
The White House said in a statement that Mr. Blinken “expressed the
United States’ support for ongoing operations by the Iraqi Security
Forces in coordination with local and tribal movements in Anbar
Province” against the militants.
TEPCO Quietly Admits Reactor 3 Could Be Melting Down NOW
TEPCO Quietly Admits Reactor 3 Could Be Melting Down NOW
According to the report: “Persons residing on the west coast of North America should IMMEDIATELY begin preparing for another possible onslaught of dangerous atmospheric radiation from the Fukushima nuclear disaster site in Japan.”
File Photo
TEPCO is reporting that “radioactive steam has suddenly begun emanating from the previously exploded nuclear reactor building #3 at the Fukuishima disaster site in Japan.”
The corporation is not clear on the details of the sudden change at Reactor 3 because of “lethal radiation levels in that building.”
Summations from experts conclude that this may “be the beginning of a ‘spent fuel pool criticality (melt down)’ involving up to 89 TONS of nuclear fuel burning up into the atmosphere and heading to North America.” Steam has been viewed coming from Reactor 3.
File Photo
TEPCO has admitted that “they do not know why this steam is being generated, but matter-of-factly revealed on December 28 that the steam was first spotted on December 19 for a short period of time, then again on December 24 and again on December 25.”
The accord is that “pellets of radioactive fuel, ejected when the reactor exploded, went into the spent fuel pool located above the reactor and have begun melting down so seriously that they are boiling off the water in the spent fuel pool.”
Should this be the case “the situation could escalate rapidly out of control.”
TRN is warning of preparatory measures that should be taken by those living on the West Coast of America because after the “releasing 89 tons of deadly radioactive fuel directly into the air”, it would be a matter or 2 to 3 days before the deadly material would fry North America “by [the] levels of airborne radiation and ‘hot particles’ which could kill.”
Some of the recommendations to mitigate damaging effect of radiation exposure include:
• Keep up-to-date on developments via the Internet
• Buy Duct tape, masking tape and self-adhesive weather stripping
• Cover windows and doors with plastic
• Cover electrical outlets and light switches with plastic
• Cover vents in bathrooms and stoves with plastic
• Purchase a NIOSH N100-certified filter mask for each member of the family
• Purchase disposable TYVEK suit for going outside
• Wash obsessively
Susanne Posel, Occupy Corporatism Edt. Ch/L-nsnbc 30.12.2013
Related article:
Record Radiation at Fukushima Reactor 2 Detected, TEPCO suspects New Leak
Nuclear Expert: Why Steam From Reactor 3 at Fukushima Matters
Editorial note: This article was first published 30 December. It was intermediately removed on 3 January for two reasons. 1) A malicious attempt to overload our servers 2) A large number of readers who appeared to panic because they read the article as if there was a meltdown in progress. The headline is rather clear on that point already, it “could” start melting down “now”.
We find the article important because it elicits the point that another meltdown, besides the three which already happened, could happen at any time. That includes, for the time being, the risk of a spent fuel rod meltdown. As Dr. Michiu Kaku, nuclear physicist said, “TEPCO is hanging over the cliff by its fingernails”. We agree that unprecedented risks, warrant unprecedented precautions.
We uploaded the article again on 4 January, and will eventually have to remove it “intermediately” again, if the overload proceeds. Christof Lehmann. Editor, nsnbc international.
Suspended account - repeat reactivate agreements
Hi
I'm posting this for a friend.
Their account got suspended and they applied to have the suspension lifted and went through the process of the agreeing to not do whatever it was again etc. Twitter support said that they'd lift the ban....nothing happened.
My friend has asked 3/4 times now and gone through the same process each time....gets the email template about you did this, promise not to do it again etc, which he replies to, then he gets one back saying ok suspension lifted etc. He then tries to log in a few hours later to be greated with the account suspended message.
He cant tweet to @support as he cant send any messages etc. how does he contact someone to actually get this sorted?
I'm posting this for a friend.
Their account got suspended and they applied to have the suspension lifted and went through the process of the agreeing to not do whatever it was again etc. Twitter support said that they'd lift the ban....nothing happened.
My friend has asked 3/4 times now and gone through the same process each time....gets the email template about you did this, promise not to do it again etc, which he replies to, then he gets one back saying ok suspension lifted etc. He then tries to log in a few hours later to be greated with the account suspended message.
He cant tweet to @support as he cant send any messages etc. how does he contact someone to actually get this sorted?
HELP GET @cleo54123 back on twitter
PLEASE HELP GET @cleo54123 back on line
please tell twitter you want cleo back on line now http://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=support
Hi
I'm posting this for a friend.
Their account got suspended and they applied to have the suspension lifted and went through the process of the agreeing to not do whatever it was again etc. Twitter support said that they'd lift the ban....nothing happened.
My friend has asked 3/4 times now and gone through the same process each time....gets the email template about you did this, promise not to do it again etc, which he replies to, then he gets one back saying ok suspension lifted etc. He then tries to log in a few hours later to be greated with the account suspended message.
He cant tweet to @support as he cant send any messages etc. how does he contact someone to actually get this sorted?
TWITTER SUSPENDED MY ACCOUNT
https://twitter.com/cleo54123
help get my @cleo54123 on twitter back @cleo54123
https://twitter.zendesk.com/home
please tell twitter you want cleo back on line now http://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=support
Hi
I'm posting this for a friend.
Their account got suspended and they applied to have the suspension lifted and went through the process of the agreeing to not do whatever it was again etc. Twitter support said that they'd lift the ban....nothing happened.
My friend has asked 3/4 times now and gone through the same process each time....gets the email template about you did this, promise not to do it again etc, which he replies to, then he gets one back saying ok suspension lifted etc. He then tries to log in a few hours later to be greated with the account suspended message.
He cant tweet to @support as he cant send any messages etc. how does he contact someone to actually get this sorted?
TWITTER SUSPENDED MY ACCOUNT
https://twitter.com/cleo54123
help get my @cleo54123 on twitter back @cleo54123
https://twitter.zendesk.com/home
World Trade Center Disaster Study
World Trade Center Disaster Study
On August 21, 2002, with funding from the U.S. Congress through FEMA, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced its building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center (WTC) disaster that occured on September 11, 2001. The NIST WTC Investigation was conducted under the authority of the National Construction Safety Team Act.The goals of the investigation of the WTC disaster were:
- To investigate the building construction, the materials used, and the technical conditions that contributed to the outcome of the WTC disaster.
- To serve as the basis for: improvements in the way buildings are designed, constructed, maintained, and used; improved tools and guidance for industry and safety officials; recommended revisions to current codes, standards, and practices; and improved public safety.
- Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed following the initial impacts of the aircraft and why and how WTC 7 collapsed;
- Determine why the injuries and fatalities were so high or low depending on location, including all technical aspects of fire protection, occupant behavior, evacuation, and emergency response;
- Determine what procedures and practices were used in the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of WTC 1, 2, and 7; and
- Identify, as specifically as possible, areas in current building and fire codes, standards, and practices that warrant revision.
High Temperatures, Persistent Heat & 'Molten Steel' at WTC Site Contradict Official Story
| High Temperatures, Persistent Heat & 'Molten Steel' at WTC Site Contradict Official Story |
 |
 |
| Tuesday, 24 August 2010 15:31 | |
Extremely high temperatures were evident before and during the
destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and at Ground Zero.
Seven minutes before the destruction of the South Tower, a flow of molten metal appeared, accompanied by several smaller flows, as documented by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The material’s glowing color showed that its temperature
was close to “white hot” at the very beginning of the flow and
“yellow-orange” further down. Iron-rich spheres in the WTC dust are
additional proof of temperatures above the melting point of iron.
Pyroclastic-like, rapidly expanding dust clouds after the destruction of the Towers can also be explained only by the expansion of hot gases.
Bechtel engineers, responsible for safety at Ground Zero, wrote in the Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers: “The debris pile at Ground Zero was always tremendously hot. Thermal measurements taken by helicopter each day showed underground temperatures ranging from 400ºF to more than 2,800ºF.” The fact that high-temperature phenomena were an important issue at Ground Zero is underscored by the large number of thermal images acquired: images by SPOT, MTI, AVIRIS/NASA, "Twin Otter"/U.S. Army, and at least 25 images by EarthData, taken between Sept. 16 and Oct. 25. In addition, temperature measurements by helicopter were taken each day, and the firefighters used onsite sensors too. Many witnesses, including rescue personnel and firefighters working on the piles, described the phenomenon of “molten steel.” Terms used in witness statements are, for example, “molten steel,” beams “dripping from molten steel,” “molten steel … like you’re in a foundry. Like lava, from a volcano.” A photograph taken on September 27 by a Ground Zero worker shows an excavating machine lifting debris from the WTC wreckage dripping yellow/orange molten metal. WTC clean-up workers and 9/11 artifacts architect Bart Voorsanger, in the PBS video “Relics from the Rubble,” described what must have been several tons of “fused element[s] of steel ... molten steel and concrete and all of these things …all fused by the heat,” weighing several tons each. These foreign objects came to be known as “meteorites.”  The heat at Ground Zero was not only extreme, it was also persistent, as proven not only by witness statements and a photograph by LiRo Group / Engineering of orange-red glowing steel as late as October 21, but also by thermal images taken by NASA and EarthData satellites. The EarthData thermal images also show that the “hot spots” remained at the same locations. The phenomenon did not “move” across the site, like one would expect from fire as it consumes the fuel available in any one location. University of California professor Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, the first structural engineer given access to the WTC steel at Fresh Kills Landfill notes, “I saw melting of girders at the World Trade Center.” Astaneh also “describes the connections [between supporting columns] as being smoothly warped: ‘If you remember the Salvador Dalà paintings with the clocks that are kind of melted – it’s kind of like that. That could only happen if you get steel yellow hot or white hot – perhaps around 2,000 degrees.’”. Iron workers at the site pointed out that huge columns that were bent into horseshoe shapes - without the flanges showing any cracks or buckling. They cited, "It takes thousands of degrees to bend steel like this". FEMA documents in their Appendix C of its May 2002 WTC Building Performance Assessment Team study, for sample 1, “evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting.” A “sulfur-rich liquid” containing “primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur” “penetrated” into the steel. The extremely high temperatures contradict the official story. Office and hydrocarbon fires burning in open air (~500° to 1,500° F) cannot reach temperatures in the range that iron or structural steel melts (2,700° F). This was even acknowledged by NIST’s Co-Project Leader, John Gross, in the same public talk where he stated regarding the phenomena of molten steel, “I know of absolutely nobody, no eyewitnesses that said so, nobody that’s produced it.” Yet there is abundant proof of the molten metal, which subsequent tests reveal to be iron, in the debris piles. Furthermore, NIST itself performed extensive fire tests to establish the temperatures reached by the WTC office and jet fuel fires. The temperatures established are far below the temperatures required to produce all of the above phenomena – which occurred both before and during the destruction and at Ground Zero. The steel problem was “solved” by NIST by excluding most of the steel from being systematically examined for failure modes and heat excursions. The steel collected by the Port Authority, which has been stored in Hangar 17 at JFK Airport, was not included in the investigation except for 12 pieces. Of the 236 pieces that NIST possessed, many were excluded based on the circular argument that only columns from impact and fire floors were of interest in the investigation. Thus, NIST avoided having to discuss 51 of its 55 core columns. Sample 1 from FEMA’s Appendix C was also excluded. In addition, NIST developed a new method of “visual examination” that it then substituted in place of the systematically used tool. NIST’s “paint cracking” method has the following “advantages”: paint cracks can be produced not only by high temperature excursions, but also by “corrosion”/ “environmental degradation” and by plastic deformation; many columns had no paint left for examination, Moreover, by relying on a method that requires microscopic examination, NIST was able to ignore pieces that were obviously heat-affected but had come from non-fire floors. A contractor’s report that employed common visual examination was “reviewed”: NIST contrasted the contractor’s results with their newly developed method and their fire exposure observations, and by employing again a circular argument. NIST’s steel “examination” shows that its “working hypothesis” was in fact its premise, and that NIST gone to great lengths to maintain this premise.  Some want to cite “natural thermite reactions” for the high-temperature phenomena: airplane aluminum must have reacted with rust. This possibility can be ruled out based on the findings of a study that was conducted in 2002 at the Colorado School of Mines for the Minerals Management Service. Officially, the study, whose lead author is a close research associate of T. W. Siewert of NIST, is about thermite-sparking in offshore environments. But due to a very odd study design the question about the feasibility of natural thermite reactions in the WTC is answered too. The authors established the ignition temperatures for rust, dehydrated rust and iron-oxide-based thermite reactions. The necessary temperatures are so high that one can conclude that thermite reactions between airplane aluminum and rust (some rust was on beams according to documents), dehydrated rust (rust dehydrates in fire) or iron oxide (iron oxide was part of the primary paint) were not feasible in the WTC. Also tested was what happens when aluminum impacts rust at very high velocity, so, interestingly, even the possibility that the impacting airplanes caused natural thermite reactions can be ruled out. The overwhelming evidence of these extremely high temperatures, which normal office fires and jet fuel cannot produce, cries out for a new investigation. The hypothesis of explosive controlled demolition must be examined and, if confirmed, followed wherever it leads, so that Americans can know for sure what was the real cause of the catastrophic loss of life at the WTC on 9/11 and the identities of everyone who was responsible for i |
An excavating machine at Ground Zero lifts debris dripping with molten metal Special Forces Operative Reveals The Osama Bin Laden Raid Was A Lie
Special Forces Operative Reveals The Osama Bin Laden Raid Was A Lie
This presidency can surely be said to be the most shrouded in secrecy of all times. From birth certificate conspiracies to everything else this man has had the indecency to lie about in order to ensure political prevalence, Obama can surely be labeled a sociopath. A letter has come forward stating that although you may believe it, things he can only express through words have proven to him that Obama did not in fact kill Osama during that raid.An Iraq war veteran, Kevin E Lake, that frequently writes for The Free Patriot, claims to have received a letter from a special forces buddy of his. Although he declares that he will not release the identity of this soldier, he makes it clear that this man has had several experiences that have contributed to his knowledge on the matter.
(See also: Official Who Verified Obama’s Birth Certificate Dies In Plane Crash)
The Special Forces operative claims that Osama Bin Laden wasn’t killed during the notourious raid on his complex by Seal Team Six. Now he does infer that Osama is still dead nonetheless—obviously as I’m sure we would have seen a video where he himself disputes the claims of his death—and was killed in a drone strike some time before.
He questions why there was no real evidence shown to the public verifying his death, and why he had an extremely secretive burial at sea. He also wonders why most of the, now famous, Seal Team Six have died under extremely mysterious circumstances—the same can be said for the woman that verified Obama’s birth certificate.
He then turns from questions to self-proclaimed fact—things he has learned along the way from other soldiers. He reportedly has a friend within Seal Team Six that is unknown to be alive or dead, but told him they never made the capture of Osama Bin Laden on that day. In fact, it was all a ploy, a publicity stunt, a political move, to get Obama reelected.
(See also: BREAKING: Obama Exposed In Another Major Obamacare Lie)
He goes on to explain, “No Sailor or Soldier had ever seen the funeral or the dead body of Bin Laden on board the aircraft carrier.”
He conveys the secrecy around the entire operation and how Seals have been ordered “mum.”
The soldier then transfers over to our government and media saying that like all sheep, we just do as we’re told, and believe what we’re told to believe in. He states that the media, acting as Obama’s lapdog and personal cheerleading squad, haven’t done their due diligence. After all, if they had, Obama would have been impeached years ago and wouldn’t have even had to worry about getting reelected.
The soldier claims that Obama is the modern Anti-Christ surely leading this country to destruction. He relays the fact that Obama is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood—a fact we already knew especially after the Syria conflict. He also reveals that beyond this, because of Obama, “the Muslim Brotherhood has already infiltrated our senate and congress.”
(See also: Obama is Asked About His Lie of the Year)
Finishing his letter, the Special Forces operative leaves us with the eerie warning, “One day Islam will rule, and they will slaughter us like they slaughter their own people. We have to stand up against this, otherwise we´re lost!”
Feel free to read the letter in its entirety here at The Free Patriot’s website.
What do you guys think about this letter—just more conspiracy theories or the true deceit of The Obama administration? Let us know in a comment below!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)