Inside the Secret World of a U.S. Arms Dealer

Apr. 30, 2014 10:57am Sara Carter

2K

Shares

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

Editor’s Note: This is the third part in an investigative series by TheBlaze into how the U.S. government failed its diplomatic team in Benghazi and allowed Al Qaeda to benefit from the lethal aid provided to rebel forces on the ground in Libya. Read part one and part two.  

-

On Sept. 11, 2011, an Armenian carrier from Albania landed in Benghazi, Libya. It was carrying 800,000 rounds of ammunition originating from Albanian surplus stocks. Three of those stocks belonged to armed forces of the United Arab Emirates, according to a 2013 United Nations investigation.
Planes from Albania, which also included weapons shipments from Ukraine, were continuing to pour into civil war-torn Libya, despite an arms embargo — and the Obama administration was well aware of what was happening, according to numerous sources who spoke to TheBlaze.

Libyan rebels man a checkpoint at Bab El Bahrah district in Tripoli, Tuesday, Aug. 23, 2011. (AP)

But what is the process for shipping hundreds of millions — if not billions — of dollars worth of weapons and ammunition from one country to another? And is it possible for the nation of origin to deliver those weapons covertly, leaving a “zero footprint” in the nation where the weapons are delivered too?
American arms dealers are intimately familiar with the process. In fact, the U.S. topped the list as the largest global supplier of major weapons from 2009 to 2013, according to a report issued by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, which conducts research on conflict, arms control and disarmament.
According to the institute, the U.S. in 2013 accounted for 45 percent of arms deliveries to Persian Gulf states, including the UAE and Qatar, and has already signed contracts that will allow it to maintain high levels of arms exports to these countries.
Wednesday’s season finale episode of TheBlaze TV’s For the Record (8 p.m. ET) will take viewers back to the night of the deadly 2012 Benghazi attacks with those who were there, and expose how Al Qaeda militants benefited from the massive weapons being delivered by the UAE and Qatar with at least tacit approval of the Obama administration.
The Purchase of Arms
A U.S. arms dealer who spoke to TheBlaze on condition of anonymity described the tedious process of getting approval for weapons transfers, and the problems that arise when the cargo is not closely monitored by intelligence or military officials on the ground. In Libya, the failure of the United States and NATO to adequately monitor the weapons being shipped by the UAE and Qatar in 2011 and 2012 gave Al Qaeda members embedded within the rebel forces an advantage and allowed others to build up their arsenals.
The arms dealer, who holds all of the appropriate licenses with the U.S. government, works in a world few have ever seen. He has traveled throughout the Middle East and South Asia, and described a world where arms dealers negotiate for the best and biggest bulk of weapons supplies. Everything is done with the knowledge of those in the “need to know” at State Department.
The weapons dealer said the first step is asking “the State Department under your license for a prior approval or request.” The dealer then gets the “end-user certificate,” he said, which comes from the country where the weapons are being shipped to and is used in international transfers and sales to certify that the buyer is the final recipient of the materials. It also prevents the transfer of weapons to another party. In Afghanistan, for example, either the minister of defense or the minister of interior would provide the end-user statement.
Then the haggling begins.

The U.S. accounted for 45 percent of arms deliveries to Persian Gulf states in 2013.

Share:

End-user certificate in hand, the weapons dealer begins getting bids, traveling to nations like Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Serbia and Ukraine — wherever a warehouse of weapons might be located — and bids on those weapons against other arms dealers from around the world.
“They would not even talk with you unless you had that end-user certificate,” the dealer said.
Once the end-user certificate is signed, it’s back to the client, who’s providing the weapons to their destination nation — usually a U.S. government agency. The “client will then turn around and issue a contract and then wire funds.”
“Then you can start procuring,” the arms dealer said, referring to the actual purchase and selection of weapons.
Before the process is complete, the prior approval request that had been to the end-user gets staffed out to at least five agencies, four within the State Department and one with the Department of Defense, for approval.
Once the authorization is complete, the process repeats itself “to some extent” so there are a number of checks and balances, he said. The export committee in the country where the arms are being purchased from will ask the dealer for the approval documentation already submitted to the State Department and for the end-user agreement.
“If you’re procuring within Bulgaria … under NATO regulations there’s a confirmation process with the State Department,” the dealer said. “So the Bulgarian export committee would then contact the U.S. Defense attache and ask, ‘is this a confirmed transaction? Can [this person] send this equipment to Kabul?’ And they will reply back and this memo will get back to the export committee, ‘yes it’s approved.’ OK, now then an export license is issued.”
After the approvals have taken place, the weapons dealer can begin organizing their logistics and transportation.
It’s usually done on a “free-carrier” basis — you “pick up your equipment at the airport which is already cleared by customs, and then you begin to ship,” he said.
And when it gets to the other end, there are more checks and balances, in the form of a delivery verification certificate.
“The end user within that country then signs off on that statement, and … they’re clear to take that equipment to the warehouse where it would be going,” the dealer said.
Because of all these steps it would  ”virtually impossible” for the U.S. government to be unaware of any transaction, he said.
‘Zero Footprint’
There is a way for countries to bypass the legal weapons transactions, he said. It is extremely risky.

This Sept. 12, 2012 file photo shows a man walking through a room in the gutted U.S. facility in Benghazi, Libya, after the attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. (AP/Ibrahim Alaguri, File)

The nation can outsource the weapons purchase “to a foreign ally to handle three components: procurement, transportation and logistics.”
But “even that part is not 100 percent untraceable, but it’s a good step if you want to eliminate all U.S. involvement,” he said.
The Obama administration “had to have been aware” and at least tacitly allowed Qatar and the UAE to procure and ship weapons to Libya, he said.
“The consequences are that you lose immediate control over the end-user, and you allow them to handle your logistics and transportation so that it prevents you from identifying who this equipment is going to fall into,” the arms dealer said. “So if you don’t put your protocols in place and you don’t deliver it to vetted sources that equipment could end up anywhere, and it’s your name on it, it’s gonna be on the end-user statement if it gets re-transferred to the wrong personnel.”
Some of those end users ended up being Al Qaeda and extremist militants.
But having the UAE and Qatar ship the weapons “gives the U.S. government plausible deniability.”
—
Follow Sara A. Carter (@SaraCarterDC) on Twitter

REPORT: Obama Directly Armed the Benghazi Terrorists

REPORT: Obama Directly Armed the Benghazi Terrorists

A year and a half later, we’re still looking for answers on Benghazi, and we’re not getting them from the Obama administration.  They continue, with the help of the media, to cover up exactly what happened and who in the administration knew what and when regarding the attack.
The Citizens’ Committee on Benghazi is a group of ex-CIA officers, former top military officials, and policy experts who are searching for answers about the attack, and the report they just released on why Benghazi happened is just disturbing.
They allege that Obama was actually arming the affiliates of Al Qaeda in Libya during their attempt to overthrow Gaddafi, and the attack could’ve been prevented had the US not “switched sides in the War on Terror.”

Via Dailymail:

‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.
She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.
‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..
‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’
The weapons were intended for Gaddafi but allowed by the U.S. to flow to his Islamist opposition.
‘The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’

The report claims that Gaddafi was willing to step down from his position of power and offer a truce with the rebels, but Obama would not allow the Pentagon to pursue a peace deal.

‘We had a leader who had won the Nobel Peace Prize,’ Kubic said, ‘but who was unwilling to give peace a chance for 72 hours.’ [...]
Gaddafi wanted only two conditions to step down: permission to keeo fighting al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), and the lifting of sactions against him, his family, and those loyal to him.
The Obama administration’s unwillingness to help broker a peaceful exit for the Libyan strongman, ‘led to extensive loss of life (including four Americans)’ when al-Qaeda-linked militants attacked U.S. diplomatic facilities in the city of Benghazi,’ the commission told reporters.

The report calls out Hillary for her negligence and betrayal of our personnel in Benghazi, and says that the claim that armed forces couldn’t have made it in time is patently false:

Lyons also said U.S. claims that it lacked the resources to mount a counterattack in time to save lives is false.
‘I’m going to tell you that’s not true,’ he said. ‘We had a 130-man unit of forces at Sigonella [AFB in Italy]. They were ready to go.’
‘The flight time from Sigonella to Benghazi is roughly an hour.’ [...]
‘They believed they were going to be saved, that they were going to be rescued, but they weren’t,’ Simmons said of the four Americans who died.
‘I know who made the decision, in my heart of hearts, to leave our war fighters there and be blown up. And then to have one of the most powerful politicians in our country sit there and say, “What difference does it make?” – should be an alarm bell for all Americans.
‘It haunts me,’ Simmons said. ‘I play that line over, and over, and over, and over in my mind.’

It’s important that we not take any of this information for granted, as these claims do go pretty far beyond what we know for sure up to this point and what Congress has been able to uncover about the attack.  What’s clear is that Obama and Hillary were negligent in securing the embassy and responding promptly with force, and they lied for weeks about the nature of the attack, saying that it wasn’t an act of terrorism.  Those are impeachable offenses.
If anything, this report should cause us to ask more questions and demand more answers from Obama.  If the media would do its job and seriously investigate Benghazi, we might get to the bottom of this thing once and for all.  We need a full select congressional committee with subpoena power to force administration officials to give us answers.

Please share this article on Facebook and Twitter if you think Obama and Hillary need to finally answer for what happened in Benghazi.

Read more at http://conservativetribune.com/obama-armed-al-qaeda

REPORT: Obama Directly Armed the Benghazi Terrorists

A year and a half later, we’re still looking for answers on Benghazi, and we’re not getting them from the Obama administration.  They continue, with the help of the media, to cover up exactly what happened and who in the administration knew what and when regarding the attack.
The Citizens’ Committee on Benghazi is a group of ex-CIA officers, former top military officials, and policy experts who are searching for answers about the attack, and the report they just released on why Benghazi happened is just disturbing.
They allege that Obama was actually arming the affiliates of Al Qaeda in Libya during their attempt to overthrow Gaddafi, and the attack could’ve been prevented had the US not “switched sides in the War on Terror.”

Via Dailymail:

‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.
She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.
‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..
‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’
The weapons were intended for Gaddafi but allowed by the U.S. to flow to his Islamist opposition.
‘The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’

The report claims that Gaddafi was willing to step down from his position of power and offer a truce with the rebels, but Obama would not allow the Pentagon to pursue a peace deal.

‘We had a leader who had won the Nobel Peace Prize,’ Kubic said, ‘but who was unwilling to give peace a chance for 72 hours.’ [...]
Gaddafi wanted only two conditions to step down: permission to keeo fighting al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), and the lifting of sactions against him, his family, and those loyal to him.
The Obama administration’s unwillingness to help broker a peaceful exit for the Libyan strongman, ‘led to extensive loss of life (including four Americans)’ when al-Qaeda-linked militants attacked U.S. diplomatic facilities in the city of Benghazi,’ the commission told reporters.

The report calls out Hillary for her negligence and betrayal of our personnel in Benghazi, and says that the claim that armed forces couldn’t have made it in time is patently false:

Lyons also said U.S. claims that it lacked the resources to mount a counterattack in time to save lives is false.
‘I’m going to tell you that’s not true,’ he said. ‘We had a 130-man unit of forces at Sigonella [AFB in Italy]. They were ready to go.’
‘The flight time from Sigonella to Benghazi is roughly an hour.’ [...]
‘They believed they were going to be saved, that they were going to be rescued, but they weren’t,’ Simmons said of the four Americans who died.
‘I know who made the decision, in my heart of hearts, to leave our war fighters there and be blown up. And then to have one of the most powerful politicians in our country sit there and say, “What difference does it make?” – should be an alarm bell for all Americans.
‘It haunts me,’ Simmons said. ‘I play that line over, and over, and over, and over in my mind.’

It’s important that we not take any of this information for granted, as these claims do go pretty far beyond what we know for sure up to this point and what Congress has been able to uncover about the attack.  What’s clear is that Obama and Hillary were negligent in securing the embassy and responding promptly with force, and they lied for weeks about the nature of the attack, saying that it wasn’t an act of terrorism.  Those are impeachable offenses.
If anything, this report should cause us to ask more questions and demand more answers from Obama.  If the media would do its job and seriously investigate Benghazi, we might get to the bottom of this thing once and for all.  We need a full select congressional committee with subpoena power to force administration officials to give us answers.

Please share this article on Facebook and Twitter if you think Obama and Hillary need to finally answer for what happened in Benghazi.

Read more at http://conservativetribune.com/obama-armed-al-qaeda/#5J7JMhE1BgmWO3AZ.99

Benghazi emails show White House effort to protect Obama

Robert Spencer Apr 29, 2014 at 1:48pm Barack Obama, free speech 41 Comments

The most disturbing aspect of this whole episode, aside from the murders of Ambassador Stevens and the others, was the fact that the Obama White House decided to blame the Internet video for the attack, thus making an indirect assault on the freedom of speech and a sidelong endorsement of Sharia blasphemy restrictions.
“Benghazi Emails Show White House Effort to Protect Obama,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, April 29, 2014:

Previously unreleased internal Obama administration emails show that a coordinated effort was made in the days following the Benghazi terror attacks to portray the incident as “rooted in [an] Internet video, and not [in] a broader failure or policy.”
Emails sent by senior White House adviser Ben Rhodes to other top administration officials reveal an effort to insulate President Barack Obama from the attacks that killed four Americans.
Rhodes sent this email to top White House officials such as David Plouffe and Jay Carney just a day before National Security Adviser Susan Rice made her infamous Sunday news show appearances to discuss the attack.
The “goal,” according to these emails, was “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.”
Rice came under fierce criticism following her appearances on television after she adhered to these talking points and blamed the attack on a little-watched Internet video.
The newly released internal White House e-mails show that Rice’s orders came from top Obama administration communications officials.
“[W]e’ve made our views on this video crystal clear. The United States government had nothing to do with it,” Rhodes wrote in the email, which was released on Tuesday by the advocacy group Judicial Watch.
“We reject its message and its contents,” he wrote. “We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence. And we are working to make sure that people around the globe hear that message.”
Rhodes also suggested that Rice tout Obama’s reputation as “steady and statesmanlike.”
“I think that people have come to trust that President Obama provides leadership that is steady and statesmanlike,” he wrote. “There are always going to be challenges that emerge around the world, and time and again, he has shown that we can meet them.”
Also contained in the 41 pages of documents obtained by Judicial Watch is a Sep. 12, 2012 email from Payton Knopf, the former deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.
In this communication, Knopf informs Rice that senior officials had already dubbed the Benghazi attack as “complex” and planned in advance. Despite this information, Rice still insisted that attacks were “spontaneous.”
The newly released cache of emails also appear to confirm that the CIA altered its original talking points on the attacks in the following days.
Then-CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell is identified as the person who heavily edited the critical fact sheet.
“The first draft apparently seemed unsuitable … because they seemed to encourage the reader to infer incorrectly that the CIA had warned about a specific attack on our embassy,” states one email. “Morell noted that these points were not good and he had taken a heavy hand to editing them. He noted that he would be happy to work with [then deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton] Jake Sullivan and Rhodes to develop appropriate talking points.”…

Suicide rate quadrupled under Obama Presidency

Suicide rate quadrupled under Obama Presidency
Constitution School: News for We the People ^ | May 3, 2013 | Constitution Shool

Posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:38:57 AM by keats5
More Americans now die of suicide than from car accidents, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a disturbing statistic that some experts say points to the true depths of the US economic crisis.
In a letter to The Lancet medical journal, scientists from Britain, Hong Kong and United States said an analysis of data from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicated that while suicide rates increased slowly between 1999 and 2007, the rate of increase has more than quadrupled since President Obama was elected to the Presidency in 2008, Reuters reports.
Citing the nation’s severe economic recession as having a direct connection to the rise of suicides, Aaron Reeves of Britain’s University of Cambridge, warned that politicians are partially to blame.
“The increase does coincide with a decrease in financial standing for a lot of families over the same time period.”
In 2010, 93% of all pre-tax income gains went to the top one percent of the American population, which in that year meant any household earning more than $358,000.
Meanwhile, preliminary research suggests that the risk for suicide will unlikely subside for future generations.
“The boomers had great expectations for what their life might look like, but I think perhaps it hasn’t panned out that way,” said Julie Phillips, an associate professor of sociology at Rutgers University. She warns that the number is actually even higher. “We know we’re not counting all suicides… It’s vastly under-reported.”
In 2010, there were 33,687 deaths from motor vehicle crashes and 38,364 suicides.
Although suicide has been traditionally viewed as a problem among the youth and elderly, the recent study, published in Friday’s issue of its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, shows a marked rise in the number of suicides among middle-aged men and women.
This may be connected to the fact that middle-aged individuals who find themselves out of work find it severely more difficult to find employment than their younger counterparts.
The suicide rate for men aged 35–64 years jumped 27.3 per cent, while the rate for women increased 31.5 per cent, from 6.2 to 8.1 per 100,000.
Among the male population, the greatest increases were among those aged 50–59 years, (from 20.6 to 30.7). Among females, suicide rates tended to increase with age. The largest percentage increase in suicide rate was observed among women aged 60–64 years (59.7 percent, from 4.4 to 7.0 per 100,000).
The pandemic of suicides seems to respect no political or cultural divisions in the United States, as two of the hardest hit states were the vastly differing localities of Wyoming and Hawaii. In conservative Wyoming, suicides jumped 78.8%, while liberal Hawaii witnessed a 61.2% increase.

---

TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: obamasuicide; suicide

Amazing statistics. Now more Americans die from suicide than from car accidents.

1 posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:38:57 AM by keats5

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

---

To: keats5

I guess they chose Change over Hope.

2 posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:42:49 AM by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

---

To: keats5

I guess they chose Change over Hope.

3 posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:44:43 AM by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

---

To: keats5

We can’t get illegal aliens to self deport, but we can get infidels to self destruct. What a country.

4 posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:45:06 AM by null and void ("Och, aye 'twas a huge beastie the shape of a haggis but the size o' the football pitch at Dunkeld!")

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

---

To: keats5

Under progressive governance this is an objective goood unless a gun was involved. Guns are bad. Especially black ones. The guns, I mean.
Being a progressive is hard. No wonder they’re so tongue-tangled.

5 posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:45:47 AM by RegulatorCountry

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

---

To: keats5

During Obama’s first four years, I went to my GP. He informed me that he had more patients now requesting sleep medication, anti-anxiety meds etc.. than he had ever seen in his entire practice. I asked “why?” and he said with so many job losses, foreclosures, money worries etc... that the “d*amn president” was affecting his patients health. With this suicide statistic... it really saddens me. I guess there are people who lose so much financially that they feel they have nothing left.

6 posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:47:06 AM by momtothree

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

---

To: keats5

If we had a Republican president the media would be all over it, and homelessness as well.

7 posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:48:49 AM by I want the USA back (Pi$$ed off yet?)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

---

To: keats5

There’ll be “high fives” in the White House tonight.

8 posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:51:40 AM by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

---

To: momtothree

I have elderly parents (dad is WWII vet) & I can tell you, they are greatly affected by Obysmal ... his policies, what he is doing to the country, the corruption, the rooting out of morals, decency and anything Christian. I hate to say this, but at least dad will likely not be here to see the total collapse of America as he knew it and fought for and I am glad he will be spared of that.

9 posted on Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:53:00 AM by MissMagnolia (You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

---

To: keats5

I wonder what God thinks?Suicide rate quadrupled under Obama Presidency
Vanity - why do we in Christian countries have a higher suicide rate?
Catholic Word of the Day: SUICIDE, 05-12-12
Suicide rates among gay men eight times higher [Scotland]
False Conversions 'Suicide' for Churches, Pastor Warns
The suicide forest of Japan: Mount Fuji beauty spot where up to 100 bodies are found every year
How voluntary is “voluntary”? (Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide)
The Secret Suicides of Oregon (Becoming More Ssecret and More Strange)
The Practice of Assisting Suicide is on the Rise in the U.S. and Abroad
Suicide: The Unexpected but Proven Result
Study: suicide rates higher in Protestant nations than Catholic ones
Disclosing the abortion-suicide association
Radio Replies Second Volume - Suicide
The Sin of Suicide

What the hell just happened? 'Tyranny By Executive Order' | by Constitutional Attorney Michael Connelly, J.D.

What the hell just happened? That is the question that many Americans should be asking themselves following the news conference where Obama unveiled his plan for destroying the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. At first glance it appeared to be a case of Obama shamelessly using the deaths of innocents, and some live children as a backdrop, to push for the passage of radical gun control measures by Congress. Most of these have no chance of passing, yet, Obama’s signing of Executive orders initiating 23 so called Executive actions on gun control seemed like an afterthought.

Unfortunately, that is the real story, but it is generally being overlooked. The fact is that with a few strokes of his pen Obama set up the mechanisms he will personally use to not only destroy the Second Amendment to the Constitution, but also the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. It will not matter what Congress does, Obama can and will act on his own, using these Executive actions, and will be violating both the Constitution and his oath of office when he does it.

Here are the sections of the Executive Order that he will use:

“1. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background-check system.”

What exactly is relevant data? Does it include our medical records obtained through Obamacare, our tax returns, our political affiliations, our military background, and our credit history? I suggest that all of the above, even if it violates our fourth Amendment right to privacy will now be relevant data for determining if we are allowed to purchase a firearm.

“2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background-check system.”

This should be read in conjunction with section 16 of the order that says:

“16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes.”

One of the few amendments successfully placed in Obamacare by conservatives does appear to prohibit doctors from asking such questions. Yet, with these two Executive actions, Obama is illegally amending an act of Congress and setting up a procedure for him to force doctors to gain information from patients about gun ownership, and to get our medical history.

Section 3 of Obama’s order states:

“3. Improve incentives for states to share information with the background- check system.”

Once again, what does this mean? What information does the Federal government want from the states? Copies of state personal and business income tax returns or court records of divorce and child custody cases are possibilities that come to mind as well as our voter registrations showing our party affiliations. How does any of this figure into our right to purchase a firearm?

One of the most dangerous and troubling sections of the Obama order in Section 4 that states:

“4. Direct the attorney general to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.”

This section directs Eric Holder, the architect of Operation Fast and Furious that illegally transferred several thousand semi automatic weapons to Mexican drug cartels and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of Mexican citizens and several U.S. border patrol agents, to now add people indiscriminately to the list of Americans ineligible to purchase firearms. Who might be added to the list?

Well, let’s look at the record of the Obama administration. Shortly after being appointed as the Director of the Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano sent a list of potential domestic terrorists to law enforcement agencies around the country. The list included individuals who were pro-life, who supported the Second Amendment, who had Ron Paul bumper stickers on their cars, and most disturbing, all members of the military returning from combat in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The list has recently been supplemented to include individuals who hoard more than a week’s supply of food and water, and those who support individual liberties and oppose big government. I belong on most of these lists and I suspect that Eric Holder will be adding all of us to the list of dangerous people not qualified to own guns. In other words, you will no longer have to be a convicted felon or mentally ill to make the list; you will qualify simply by being an American patriot.

This is not a conspiracy theory, at the United States Justice Foundation we are seeing increasing evidence that military veterans are being specifically targeted by the Obama administration when it comes to prohibitions against purchasing firearms. Any veteran diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is in danger of being banned from owning a firearm. Even those veterans suffering from mild depression are being added. None of these conditions constitute a mental illness that makes them a danger to themselves or others.

However, in Obamaland veterans who took an oath to “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”, are definitely considered a threat to the new Fuehrer and must not be allowed to own firearms.

If we skip to Section 6 of the order we get a good idea of Obama’s real intentions when it comes to gun control. That sections states:

“6. Publish a letter from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers.”

This is particularly interesting because one of the legislative proposals is to require universal background check requirements for any firearm transfer even between private citizens. In other words, you can’t sell your firearm or even give it to someone s a gift without Federal government approval. It is doubtful that this proposal will pass in the House of Representatives, yet Obama is already setting up the mechanism for enforcing the requirement. That is a clear signal that he doesn’t care what Congress does, he is going to violate the Constitution and bypass the Legislative branch in order to push his agenda to disarm the American people. I suspect he will ultimately use Executive orders to ban many weapons including most rifles and pistols.

There are numerous other actions dictated in the Obama order, but I think you get the idea. Our Second Amendment right is going to be taken from us for whatever reasons Obama decides. The simple act of opposing these actions can cause the Attorney General to place you on the list of “dangerous people”. Our privacy will be violated and all of this will be done without due process of law. That is what just happened.

Follow Us: @redflagnews on Twitter

Get the RedFlag app today for Apple and Android devices...

If You Are Afraid Of Another Bundy Siege, This Congressman Has A Plan To Never Let It Happen Again

His bill could end the BLM as we know it.

---

Share Tweet Email

B. Christopher Agee — April 30, 2014

The recent standoff between federal Bureau of Land Management agents and protesters at the Bundy Ranch in Nevada exposed a reality many Americans have seen coming for decades. Federal agencies are becoming more tyrannical as they rely on their own armed officers instead of, as our Constitution mandates, allowing local and state authorities to handle law enforcement.
While many politicians have spoken out against this creeping authoritarianism, at least one elected official is advancing a plan to combat it. House Appropriations Committee member Chris Stewart recently announced he wants to see funding for a myriad of agencies with their own “paramilitary” forces.

“There are lots of people who are really concerned when the BLM shows up with its own SWAT team,” he said this week.
The Utah representative explained that these federal agencies were established for regulatory purposes only and have systematically been gravitating toward enforcement.
Stewart said his position should not be construed as support of the Bundy family, but as concern regarding how the situation was handled by the BLM.
“They should do what anyone else would do,” he explained. “Call the local sheriff, who has the capability to intervene in situations like that.”
His concerns have been echoed by a number of other, mostly Republican, legislators. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, for example, complained that there are now “48 federal agencies carrying weapons and having SWAT teams.”
If Stewart gets his wish, the spending cuts would force these agencies to defer to local authorities when a situation like the Bundy Ranch dispute arises.
BLM spokesperson Jessica Kershaw, however, insists the bureau only has a limited number of armed officers and already depends on municipal police, sheriffs, and other authorities.
“Partnerships and coordination with local law enforcement are a key part of the equation,” she said, emphasizing the “need to leverage limited resources.”
Photo Credit: Facebook/Congressman Chris Stewart

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/gop-rep-plan-dealing-authoritarian-federal-agencies/#VwWW0g4xw1WuxTXh.99

From Jim Stone - Flight 370 Summary Report

29 Apr 2014

From Jimstonefreelance.com:
April 28 2014
Flight 370 Summary report
Permalink
All the important facts in one place.
Preface: There is absolutely no doubt that flight 370 was electronically hijacked and flown through the Maldives and on to Diego Garcia. There is also no doubt that there was a plan to use at least the image of flight 370 to crash the nuclear summit in Belgium and blame it on Iran, and that the Dutch intercepted the crash craft before it arrived. This report is documented accurate. There will be a lot here, briefly discussed that you have not seen before. If you were looking for a concise report that will give a clear picture, this sums it all up.
First and foremost, the pilots DID NOT cooperate with the hijack. Co pilot successfully dialed out via last cell tower in Malaysia. http://tinyurl.com/qjoh2zz
There is absolutely verified proof that the pilots DID NOT cooperate, and that therefore an Awacs platform had to have been used to jam radar and communications. The absolute proof that the plane was electronically hijacked against pilots will, and that all communications were cut against pilot will came when the co-pilot of flight 370 successfully dialed out to reach his mother when the plane was hijacked and en route to Diego Garcia. The call was picked up by the last tower in Penang on the West Coast of Malaysia. It abruptly cut, but the origin of it being flight 370 has been confirmed. The U.S. denies this, (what else would you expect) but police investigators have confirmed through the Mother´s call records that the call did in fact happen. The call location confirms flight 370 did indeed turn around and head towards Diego Garcia.
The confirmed fact that the pilot used a cell phone at this time, when cell phones are well known to not be able to connect from aircraft except in the most ideal of circumstances serves as verification that the pilots were trying to communicate but could not and exhausted every possible means to contact people on the ground. This kills the "pilots switched off the transponder lie, and also shows that ALL OTHER LIES, such as "the pilots were rendered unconcious by smoke and flew dead stick, and "the pilots cut the radio themselves" and all the other myths as what they are - psy ops launched by the CIA to kill the fact that AMERICA TOOK THAT PLANE. Fate definitely favored the pilot. The call was obviously a last resort effort by the pilot to communicate that worked. THIS IS CONFIRMED FOLKS.
CONFIRMED: Same company that has flight370 clone in Israel was intercepted before another 777 they owned could reach the nuclear summit with it's transponder off.
G.A. teleisis is an aircraft leasing firm that has a clone of flight 370 sitting in Tel Aviv Israel. Interesting it is then that this same company had another 777 that flew out of Florida, through European radar with no transponder on "without being noticed", and into Dutch airspace. It then made a bee line directly for the nuclear summit in a delclared no fly zone set up to protect the summit and refused to identify itself. The Dutch scrambled two F-16's to intercept it, and managed to force it to turn around and land elsewhere. http://tinyurl.com/m7dgx4uAll
All media was scrubbed of the details, but when you consider that all Israeli diplomats went on strike a few days before the summit and therefore none were there, it's pretty easy to connect the dots here.
We were obviously supposed to get a crash at the summit, which would have killed many world leaders including Obama, all to be blamed on Iran.

The ziopress did not fake the "Iranian terrorist" photo to the left for nothing!
If we can claim at least a partial victory in the flight 370 saga, it was this intercept which would have obviously been blamed on the two "terrorists" from Iran who supposedly boarded with "fake passports".
Many reasons for the hijack were given, and TWO make sense to me with one honorable mention
MOST PROBABLE REASON:
What I believe to be the most probable reason revolves around Chinese data security in the run up to world war 3. China has developed their own very powerful and completely secure microprocessor totally lacking ANY NSA back door, and paired it off with their own completely secure operating system that does not have any back doors, at least none the NSA knows about. http://phys.org/news161355225.htmlThis
This has allowed China to secure their data, and the entire country is switching over to it, and has been in the process of doing so for at least five years.
A newer version of this un hackable processor was put in the Longsoon Yeelong laptop, which I had a chance to play with in 2012 in Mexico City. It's not remarkable, but it is at least definitely up to modern standards at approximately the same level as a dual core Intel Atom (a high end netbook processor) running 1ghz or better. China scored a major hit with it, and there is no doubt the NSA wanted it's secrets. You got to know about the Freescale employees on flight 370, but there were 80 other Chinese tech workers that mysteriously slipped all media attention and it is my guess that these workers were involved in chinese data security, which the NSA would want to breach before launcing world war 3 against them.
Add to this the fact that after flight 370 and as a direct result of it, China lost all trust in the American government, EVERY LAST BIT OF IT, and will be launching their own enormous satellite network to prevent a flight 370 from ever happening again. If it was THAT important, it was about more than just a microchip patent and for that reason I believe flight 370 was really about Chinese data security.
The drone control center seizure-
This theory involves a successful taleban heist of an American drone command and control center which was subsequently sent to Malaysia and sold to China, and was loaded onto flight 370 in six crates at the back of the passenger area, which was reduced to accomodate them. During the pull out from Afghanistan, when the transport carrying a drone command and control center was on it's way down the mountain, it was successfully ambushed by the Taleban. Two American special forces people were killed by the Taleban, and the taleban seized the contents of the transport and succesfully got away with it. It ended up being a complete command and control center for drone warfare, including multiple terminals, computers, EVERYTHING including the classified software, decryption, the whole 9 yards, and the Taleban sold it to the Chinese. This supposedly got loaded onto flight 370 for delivery to China. The story continues that it was Israeli intelligence that figured all of this out, and they worked with American forces to electronically hijack flight 370 and get it to Diego Garcia. But this could be rumor, and how valuable is a drone control center anyway? Would that be worth this level of hijack?
Honorable mention - the "tiny microchip"--
This story was hatched on Rense. And I don't really buy it but it is a big one so it has to be addressed. SUPPOSEDLY, (and this would be really significant if it was true) the Freescale employees had developed a "tiny microchip" that was to be put in micro drones that could crawl in like insects, and ISRAEL wanted that chip. So they hijacked the chinese engineers to extract all the secrets about that chip, so they could launch their own army of micro drones.
The story has problems. First of all, the patent that was held by freescale employees may not have been held by the Freescale employees who were actually on the plane. And more importantly, the patent was in fact a manufacturing patent that made chips smaller so more could fit on a single piece of silicon, and the more you can get out of a piece of silicon, the more profit you make. This shoots a big hole in the "tiny microchip" story, because as a coincidence it seems like it was just made up to accommodate the story about the patent holders. Other things that blow the micro drone story are simple facts such as the chip part is easy, what is difficult is getting the mechanical parts to be small enough to make a micro drone viable, AND more significantly, getting enough potential energy onto the drone in the form of fuel or a battery to make that drone capable of going more than a mile or so before pooping out. Though the "tiny microchip drone" story is likeable because it really fingers Israel, I hate to say I doubt it, because I'd really like to be able to say that one is true. After all, we all know who the enemy is if we posess at least a dozen neurons.
Phillip Wood
Philip wood actually happened. He actually did dial out of Diego Garcia after hiding a cell phone, possibly in his butt cheeks, and waiting for the correct time to try to make contact. Many shills took the photo I posted and pulled it into photoshop and other editors and modified it, and then posted the modified versions online and lied about everything.
Many people know that I cannot use my own computers to administer this web site, because they get promptly destroyed by the NSA and other hackers. So I have to use cyber cafe machines. So when I got the original philip wood photo, all I could do was transfer it directly over to the web server, I forgot my flash drive and had no offline backup. Right around three hours after I posted the real photo, hackers hit my web site and put up a picture of a bloody body that went across all the pages. At the same time they did this, they destroyed the forensic value of the photo by changing the way the GPS format was displayed in the photo while keeping the coordinates original. They left the rest of it alone, so when you see all the idiot shills out there with photos saying they were modified by Picasa or Photoshop, that much is still debunkable.
Along with the original photo, Philip posted the following message:
"I have been held hostage by unknown military personal after my flight was hijacked (blindfolded). I work for IBM and I have managed to hide my cellphone in my ##### during the hijack. I have been separated from the rest of the passengers and I am in a cell. My name is Philip Wood. I think I have been drugged as well and cannot think clearly."
The shills hammered this so hard it was downright shocking, hatching every lie you could imagine, easily refuted ones, such as "Philip wood did not work for IBM" and "there is no cell service on Diego Garcia", and "philip wood was a "crisis actor". AND THE LATEST? Now people are claiming to be pulling absolute bits and finding what is in the photo and getting pictures of islands, airplane windows, and other things. But the photo to the lower left here is ALL THERE IS, this is an absolute bit render by a Retinax filter, there is NOTHING MORE. And it really looks like Philip is sitting in a dark cell with the same type of black bag over his head that the U.S. army uses to blindfold people. All of the shillage was downright easy to refute, which resulted in my posting the following:
Remember the shills
http://jimstonefreelance.com/remembertheshills.html
If you ever get hijacked, kidnapped, or become the victim in a war or terror attack, REMEMBER THE SHILLS.
Remember them if you ever manage to get a message out to the world about where you are, because they will promptly jump on it to shut you up.
No matter what the story, no matter what the circumstance, if anyone tries to get your message to the public despite the shills, those trying to help you will become the object of ridicule and the target of thousands of paid shills, who will lie, hack and cheat their way into burying the fact that you are alive, and that you managed to speak.
Such has been the case with Philip wood. And I would like to point out why.
Philip claimed to get a message out with an iphone after being separated from the rest of the people and put in a prison cell alone. And every part of what he said was shilled practically into oblivion.
The first thing the shills said was Phillip wood did not exist, but THAT was a lie.
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/philliplinkdin.png
They then said that an Iphone could never be hidden from a search, but THAT was a lie and I promise you, no one hides a knife up their @.http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulliver/2011/01/tsathreatdetection
They then tried to make people believe that there is no civilian cell service on Diego Garcia that Philip could have connected with, because "it's a military base, there are no civilians there" but then Lt. Col Caggns at DOD media relations in Arlington confirmed cell service in fact IS available on Diego Garcia (go figure) because Diego Garcia has a large civilian population for such a small island, 1,600 civilians working high paying jobs. And they can't call home. YEP. Because according to the SHILLS there can't be a satellite linked cell tower. And then I found the smoking gun - EVEN NATIONAL GEOGRPAHIC MAGAZINE PROVIDES CELL COVERAGE FOR DIEGO GARCIA, http://www.cellularabroad.com/packages-diegogarcia.html and THIS got hacked off the main Philip wood page. Gotta put that one back!
They then insisted that in his @ meant up his rectum, and not just in the cheeks, where the TSA fails 70 percent of the time. And even if it was his rectum, they lied when they said it would not fit, http://www.vice.com/read/bollocks-to-the-hippocratic-oath-deaths-back-door even though Philip had five hours to think of a way to get it in there before the plane landed.
Then, after all of that was answered clearly, they then went on to say that it could never have happened because (lie)"an Iphone cannot be turned off" http://ipod.about.com/od/iphonehowtos/qt/turnoffiphone.htmwhen it absolutely can be turned off, and that an Iphone will only last a day when turned on, when in reality if there is nothing wrong with the iphone, it can be turned on for over a week in standby easily. http://tinyurl.com/ntk2bxd
You see, shills think you are stupid, SO STUPID you will believe that a high end gadget in 2014 always kills the battery in a few hours no matter what. Welcome 1970's carbon battery.
And they could not have the real picture out there in circulation, NO. So they hacked their way into the major web site that posted it, and destroyed the exif so it had no real forensic value within a few hours, and in stupidity made it obvious by putting up a picture of a bloody body on that same web site. Let me ask, was that a threat?
People were not stupid enough to buy all the shillage, so the shills then hatched the only lie left - that the story was too perfect to be true. But how else could it be? Consider the message:
"I have been held hostage by unknown military personal after my flight was hijacked (blindfolded). I work for IBM and I have managed to hide my cellphone in my ##### during the hijack. I have been separated from the rest of the passengers and I am in a cell. My name is Philip Wood. I think I have been drugged as well and cannot think clearly."
Let's dissect that. "I have been held hostage by unknown military personal after my flight was hijacked (blindfolded)." If this was a hoax given what was known by all the zit picking kids out there, the message would have instead said "I have been held hostage by American forces after my plane was hijacked. I am in Diego Garcia. But he does not know who his captors are, and that is a total green light for the story being true, because they sure as heck would never tell him. And he obviously did not know where he was.
He was blindfolded. The Army will blindfold people with a locked bag over the head that the people they put it on can't get off, to leave their hands free when they have been judged to not be a threat. Once in the cell, they took the handcuffs off because he was not a threat, he was the victim and they left the bag to avoid being identified. Philip, who may have been beta testing the latest IBM voice recognition software or using the voice recognition abilities of the Iphone, swiped the screen correctly to turn it on and then talked to it to get it logged in somewhere to get his message out because he could not see the screen. THE KICKER IS THAT IT IS OBVIOUSLY A VOICE RECOGNITION MESSAGE. IT'S CHOPPY AND THE WORD PERSONNEL WAS INTERPRETED AS THE WORD PERSONAL. THE TWO ARE TOO DIFFERENT FOR THAT TO BE A TYPO, VOICE ASSISTED SOFTWARE OBVIOUSLY DID THAT ERROR.
So, the first line of what he said FITS PERFECT.
"I work for IBM and managed to hide my cellphone in my ##### during the hijack". Shills ripped this, saying he would not have bothered with where he worked. That is a load of BUNK. If he was flying to Bejing, he was most likely on a business flight for work, and wanted to make clear who he was so there would be no mistake. And where else would he put the cell phone other than his #####? in his ear? his pee hole? Come on now, that shillage was thin.
So the second line could not have been any different in a real scenario
"I have been separated from the rest of the passengers and am in a cell" The fact that he waited to be separated from the rest of the passengers to get the message out is absolutely the way it would have been, before separation they would have been closely watching all the passengers and he did not risk losing his phone while under close scrutiny. Once in the cell, the cell prevents escape and would not have immediate supervision. THAT would be the time to dial out.
So the third line is exactly the way it would be, because Phil is a smart guy, he works for IBM in database security and knew when to try to reach the outside world.
"My name is Philip Wood. I think I have been drugged as well and cannot think clearly" That supports the story extremely well, American forces unilaterally drug all prisoners.
BOTTOM LINE? THE STORY WASHES. And NEVER FORGET what the shills did to this if you ever end up in trouble, if you ever try to call out you had better hope no one in a high position of power in America or Israel can benifit from shutting you up, because they will if they can.
Philip was probably just an average guy. He probably believes CNN and that arabs did 911. He probably thinks America is a beacon of freedom and truth, and really believed that if his message hit a blog somewhere it would go viral. He snapped a picture and sent it, knowing his Iphone would send his location. But that did not work, because everything he believed about American freedom, evil arabs, and everything else CNN pushes was a lie.
There will be no rescue for Philip wood, because the liars, hackers, shills and war department media made good and sure that will never happen despite the fact that he did get a message out. Phil will have his mind destroyed so he will never be able to speak up again, and be used to push a mop for the rest of his life if he is lucky.
And if phil managed to get a message out to anyone in his family, they would have been detained or killed instantly and kept silent, but that probably did not happen because all calls would have been censored. All log ins to any accounts he had blocked. The only hope for phil was an anonymous blog that did not require log in.
So if you ever find yourself in Phil's position, REMEMBER THE SHILLS, THE HACKERS, THE LIARS AND CHEATS, they will number in the thousands and will hatch any lie possible to screw public opinion against you no matter what message you get out, REMEMBER THEM, THEY WORK FOR A PAYCHECK AND THEY WILL NOT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOU.
Flight 370 really was hijacked by Awacs and flown to Diego Garcia, and there is plenty out there to prove it.
Malaysian airlines flight 377 has been provably hijacked by an AWACS plane. This is outlined in the updates below.
UPDATE:
The Malaysian military tracked this plane for a full hour with military radar after it "vanished from civilian radar because "the transponders were switched off" (B.S.) radar is radar, it does not need a "transponder" to track a plane and they can eat dog poo. And Awacs would have shut down any transponder for a plane kidnapping anyway, it took no terrorist to do it.
ANYWAY, the plane did a u-turn and was "last spotted" on the other side of Malaysia. They made the mistake of saying it was "flying low" when it was still at 29,500 feet, far higher than needed to show on radar, to deceive people into believing THAT is why it "vanished" from radar. A whole bunch of lies were hatched about how it disappeared from civilian radar because "the transponder was switched off" but RADAR IS RADAR AND ONLY COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE TRANSPONDERS, PRIVATE PLANES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE TRANSPONDERS. Radar is there to prevent private planes that have no transponders from hitting commercial ones among other things, and if radar can see a private plane that has no transponder it certainly can see a huge jumbo jet. So you can take the transponder lies and trash them.
But the plane DID disappear from civilian radar even though military radar tracked it for a now admitted full hour longer.

What could make a plane disappear from civilian radar while at 36,000 feet yet still be visible on military radar? ONE THING, and it looks like a UFO (as some have speculated) only it's attached to a boeing jet - the antenna on a U.S. Air Force AWACS plane. The fact that this missing jet vanished from civilian radar yet remained visible on more robust military radars proves well enough for me that this indeed was an AWACS hijacking, just like we saw on 9/11 where AWACS planes were seen on video observing if not controlling the crashes into the twin towers. Once the plane flew far enough West, Awacs was obviously enough to jam both civilian and military radars, probably because they entered a zone where the angle of both incoming signals allowed for their simultaneous cancellation. That is where the plane finally "vanished" forever, an hour after the "official" vanishing act. The final vanish happened while at 29,500 feet. Though AWACS was originally released as a radar platform there are many variants of awacs type planes now that serve many types of radio oriented missions including jamming and takeover, and they all have the same antenna dome.
In this scenario, we now have: The plane did a u-turn and flew the other way for a now admitted full hour.
UPDATE: FIVE hours. THAT supports the Awacs story.
Obvious fake photoshopping of "terrorists". THAT supports the Awacs story.
Cell phones still ringing, which would only be possible with a safe landing. THAT supports the Awacs story.
Missing black boxes. THAT supports the Awacs story (the plane is obviously intact).
A reason to electronically hijack the airplane - 20 top people from a semiconductor firm that works defense, with employees working for countries that are not allies yet VERY powerful - THAT supports the Awacs story.
And the GRAND FINALE: PLANE DISAPPEARS FROM CIVILIAN RADARS WHILE REMAINING VISIBLE ON MILITARY RADARS. THAT supports the Awacs story and pushes it to the forefront of logic like a tsunami on a beach umbrella, if THAT does not raise a few eyebrows people are sleeping.
And I'd have to say the CIA's obvious pushing of B.S. regarding this supports the Awacs story as well; If this plane shows up somewhere in pieces now, it was electronically hijacked by an AWACS plane - the same type seen on 9/11, and the people were offloaded and questioned (engineers probably waterboarded for defense secrets). IF that plane shows up in pieces now it happened last night, not three days ago FINAL ANSWER.
UPDATE: Exact logic sequence for proving the U.S. air force hijacked the Malaysian airlines flight.
1. Absent an awacs type system which can precisely monitor a received signal and spoof a return signal (or phase cancel it) you cannot disappear a non stealth aluminum skinned plane from ANY radar system. After vanishing from civilian radars, it remained on military radars that would work better against AWACS. That pretty much says it all.
2. Iran is an ally of Russia. Russia has Awacs type systems, but would not try to frame up Iran in a terror plot with a fake passport story supported by idiotically faked photos. Russia did not do this.
3. China and Malaysia also have Awacs type systems. Since it was a Malaysian plane flying with Chinese engineers, it is safe to rationalize out that neither China nor Malaysia did this.
4. Though the engineers on the plane also worked with stealth technologies such as Awacs, it takes a huge UFO shaped antenna to make such systems work, and Malaysian passenger jets do not have them as a standard feature. This was not a stunt played by Freescale Semiconductors.
5. Israel wants war with Iran, and the CIA hatching a terror plot with horribly faked photos stands in the evidence pool against the U.S. air force, which is their sex slave.
6. The obvious motive was military, and a real tie in was the fact that the plane disappeared from civilian radar while at full cruising altitude, but not the military radars. In this case the air force had to choose which radar they would spoof with Awacs (there is extreme difficulty with spoofing more than one system simultaneously unless there is a lucky alignment of signals) and they just hoped the military would not catch on. ONE PROBLEM, the Malaysian military was not as inept as the Air Force thought. PLAN FAILURE.
7. The Iranian terror plot fits the logic tree well. Since the photos were obviously faked, WHO WOULD DO THAT? WHO WANTS WAR WITH IRAN? No brainer there.
8. The cell phones are ringing, and the only organization in the world that can say where they are is the NSA. WHY THE SILENCE?
Logic sequence output: Because the plane was hijacked electronically by those who keep the NSA funded and the NSA has been told to SHUT UP. If those phones were in lost baggage, the NSA would have said so RIGHT AWAY, and even the airline company would have figured it out by now, found the bags, heard the phones ringing and said, OH, WE KNOW WHY THEY RING. And the phones are not dead ringing as can happen with some american carriers, because on one occasion one of the phones was picked up and hung up without anything being said. But NOPE, NOTHING on this from the NSA, which means those phones are ringing on a runway somewhere, and the NSA knows EXACTLY WHERE. Yet they still support the CIA, which is doing it's best to hatch a B.S. terror plot about a couple Iranians with fake photos and THERE IS YOUR ANSWER, AMERICA HAS THAT PLANE AND IS PROBABLY WATERBOARDING THE FREESCALE ENGINEERS RIGHT NOW, EXTRACTING CHINESE MILITARY SECRETS. If the plane is now "found" in pieces it will mean "they" gave up on the B.S. story line and decided to ditch it somewhere rather than use it on the Petronas towers or the Sears tower.
The hijacking story won't work now that we know the Malaysian military was able to track the plane because a hijacker cannot switch off a radar system 500 miles away and cannot prevent the plane from being found on radar wherever it went to, ONLY AWACS COULD.
UPDATE:
The shills are panicking trying to prop up and support the "transponder" lie. Here is a response I posted to a shill that pretty much says it all:
I am not unaware of the situation with private aircraft. I have seen at least a dozen and NOT A SINGLE ONE had a transponder. Your claim that most private aircraft have transponders is a lie.
There was no "primary" or "secondary" radar. The transponder only identifies the craft that is being reflected on active radar.
I believe you told the most plausible lie people would ever believe, but you forgot something, I am former NSA and can call bullshit on practically anything.
You cannot tell me that the airport did not have primary active radar systems in Malaysia, we are not talking LaPaz Bolivia even, and even La Paz has active radar. Any city in America with a population over 50,000 will have an airport with active radar. You are implying that a 777 jet took off from an airstrip in an advanced country that was laid out on a dirt path intersecting goat trails and therefore had to transmit back to tell the airport where it was. What a load of B.S.
FOR THE RECORD: THE PLANE VANISHED FROM ACTIVE AIRPORT RADAR. THE FACT THAT THE TRANSPONDER SWITCHED OFF AT THE SAME TIME IT VANISHED FROM ACTIVE AIRPORT RADAR PROVES AWACS EVEN MORE, I KNOW YOU WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT AWACS CAN'T JAM A TRANSPONDER BECAUSE YOU PROBABLY WORK DEFENSE YOURSELF BUT TRUTH BE TOLD, THAT OUTCOME IS AN OBVIOUS ONE and to the other shills, AWACS type planes have many functions and one of them is JAMMING EVERYTHING. AWACS planes have amazing signal jamming capabilities, this is so well established fact that you are going to have to shill even Pakistani agricultural web sites to front the lie that AWACS is not used for jamming. Give up on that one, even goat herders are not that stupid.
Circumstances prove the Maldives sighting legit--
http://jimstonefreelance.com/maldivessighting.html
Here is the main argument against, and it's dirt simple to skewer.
The prevailing argument against the Maldives sighting is the fact that the Maldives are slightly off course for Diego Garcia. But there is an enormous hole in that argument -
The reason why the plane was taken over the Maldives is because Iran, Russia, India, and many other nations have warships occasionally frequent the Indian Ocean, and there are also many oil tankers and other shipping vessels. Flying over one of those would be far worse than flying over the Maldives, where people are simple, sparse and isolated from the rest of the world.
ALL COMMERCIAL AND ALL MILITARY SHIPS ARE EQUIPPED WITH RADAR. The radars are more limited than ground based radars, but the ships still have them. On top of this, ships are going to be staffed with people more capable of making observations. The path flight 370 took would have been a tradeoff of distance and risk of being seen and recognized. So the Maldives was the obvious best choice of routes.
I see the Maldives route as absolute proof of a U.S. military hijacking of flight 370 for the forementioned reason, and another huge one, which is -
Eyewitnesses said the plane was LOUD, and they were able to get out of their homes and see it before it was gone. There's a huge problem with that - to meet airport regulations, 777 aircraft, which are modern, are also very quiet.But fighter jets are extremely loud. They are not quiet because they go supersonic, and even at subsonic speeds, any airplane that can fly at supersonic speeds cannot be quiet.
Subsonic planes which can be quiet, such as the 777 use an airfoil shaped wing to stay aloft. An airfoil produces a negative pressure on the top of the wing, and the plane literally gets pulled into the sky by vacuum pressure built up on the top of the wing. But as soon as supersonic speeds are approached, an airfoil won't work because the vacuum pressure region moves towards the back of the wing, and at too high a speed the wing no longer generates lift and the plane will drop like a rock.
Supersonic planes use pressure on the bottom of the wing to generate lift, and if they also need to have performance, there is no way a plane of this design can ever be quiet. Rather than lift their way into the sky, they punch their way into the sky and the engines have to be very powerful and be revived hard for enough force to be generated to a height without being noticed keep them aloft even at subsonic speeds. This along with size to performance considerations makes them very loud.
Even if flight 370 had been loud, it likely would have been there and gone before anyone got out of their house to see it. But if a cloaked fighter jet was in front of it as an escort, and a cloaked fighter jet was behind it, the people would have heard them and been out of their homes on time to see only what was not visibly cloaked - flight 370. And since flight 370 would have been the only thing visible to simple people, all noises would get blamed on it regardless of where they originated in the sky.
The extremely loud noise basically check mates the sighting, it's legit. Flight 370 was electronically hijacked and flown over the Maldives to avoid being sighted by whoever was out on the ocean and received escort from two or more visibly cloaked fighter jets.
THAT is my FINAL ANSWER with regard to the Maldives sighting.
...................... ............ ..... Robert Smith O'Ghobhain
Sarnia, Ontario

by Stupidamerkin