Forget About The Birther Argument, We Have No President!

in News, Videos / by Brandon Walker / on June 7, 2014 at 11:21 pm /

For five years we have been arguing over the legitimacy of this presidency.  People have dug up records, proven he used a false social security number, and we have the debate of where he was born. Forget about the birther argument, it doesn’t matter where he was born, we have no legitimate president in the United States.
Now don’t get me wrong, Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Orly Taitz have done a good job uncovering a lot of documentation to say this man called Barack Hussein Obama was not born in the United States. I have a great deal of respect for them and the investigation team that have taken this to court over and over and may actually get it heard before the Supreme Court. I don’t have a lot of respect for the very first birther, Hilary Clinton, but how soon the Liberal Left will forget that she was the one that brought it up in the first place due to his statements of being the first Kenyan born Senator.  I’ve even seen several of their movies on Western Center for Journalism and WND.
I’m saying it doesn’t matter. That is not what we should concentrate on if you want to prove this man can not be President of the United States.
The entire thing that makes the case for whether he is an Usurper to the US Constitution and not the legitimate President of the US, or if he is eligible to be the leader of the Executive branch all hinges on one thing: his natural born citizenship.
You see, I don’t question his claim to US citizenship. For him to claim being a citizen he only had to have one parent that was a United States Citizen. Yes, I’ll be the first to come out and say it. Barack Hussein Obama, or even if he used his alias of Barry Soetoro, could claim US Citizenship. His mother Ann Dunham was an American Citizen. Therefore it doesn’t matter if he was born here in the United States in Hawaii as he says, or if he was born in Kenya like the birthers say. Either way he would be an American Citizen by birth, but not a Natural Born Citizen as required by the Constitution.
Now in order to be president of the United States, you have to be a Natural Born Citizen. There is a difference between a US Citizen and a Natural Born Citizen. That is where the problem lies, and it has nothing to do if Obama was born here in Hawaii or Kenya or as some have proposed Seattle, Washington.
Now the reasons the birthers are so frantic is because Title 8 Section 1401 of the United States Code attempts to abridge this by saying it means someone that is a United States Citizen at birth. What they don’t understand is that the United States Code can not change the Constitution without an amendment. Therefore it doesn’t matter that they recently tried to pull a fast one, if it hasn’t been judicially challenged and is in direct conflict of the Constitution; that means this law is considered unlawful, unconstitutional, and can not be used as a legal definition, nor is enforceable. The courts have already ruled on what is a Natural Born Citizen, and that ruling can not be changed without a constitutional amendment approved by 75%  of Congress and the States. That’s right. I’ll say it again. The Constitution and the Supreme Court have already defined Natural Born Citizen and that can not be changed without changing the Constitution.
You see, the Constitution uses the word citizen several times. It is found in Article 1 Section 2, Article 1 Section 3, Article 1 Section 8, and in the 14th Amendment. The argument of “Aha, see he is eligible” comes crashing down around Article 2 Section 1.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. ~US Constitution

It goes a step further to define what is a Natural Born Citizen by using the definition in the Law of Nations, and that is where the trouble comes in for our current Usurper.

§ 212. Citizens and natives~The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. ~US Legal Dictionary

If we take a close look at the long form birth certificate provided by Whitehouse.gov (pictured on the right), you will find one strange thing that is the “smoking gun” that all these lawyers, law enforcement, experts, and legal gurus have been searching for, and I always wondered why they didn’t realize it instead of trying to prove this is a fake. Barack Hussein Obama Sr. never was a US Citizen. Even if you want to go the birther route, BHO’s father never was a US Citizen. Neither was his adopted father. He was not born to two parents that were both US Citizens.
Now if you are thinking that surely this would have more legal definition then that, turns out there is. There are a total of four US Supreme Court cases that define what it means in the US Constitution to be a Natural Born Citizen.

1. The Venus-12 US 253 (1814) – the natives or indigenous are those born of the country who’s parents are citizens.
2. Shanks v. Dupont (1830) – for children born in a country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake of his national character as a citizen of that country.(which kinda adds a twist saying that if he practiced his father’s nationality, which he did, he would be a British subject. Has he ever revoked his British citizenship?)
3. Minor v. Hppersett ( 1875) – children born (in this case a woman) where both parents are citizens are natural born citizens of the United States.
4. US v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) – children born to parents who are both US Citizens are in turn defined as natural born citizens.

There has not been any other Supreme Court case to try to define Natural Born Citizen. There hasn’t had to be. The Supreme court made a decision on it four times, and all four times it agreed with the US Constitution. In order to be a Natural Born Citizen, you had to have two parents that were also citizens of the United States. For the lawmakers to say that the definition by the Constitution is too vague so they need to make a law usurping the Constitution is illegal. Its an unlawful order. You can not change the Constitution without amending it through the ratification process.
Unfortunately for Barack Obama, that also means that he is a usurper. He can not hold the title for president, nor was he eligible for the office according to the US Supreme Court and the US Constitution. This is even further compounded when you have to stop and wonder if he ever revoked his Indonesian or British Citizenship, which would make him a foreign national that usurped the Presidency. By arresting him as a usurper, unlike impeachment, it makes all executive orders he made null and void. It also makes all laws he signed during the time  in which he said he was President null and void. All treaties signed, same thing.
There is also bad news for any member of congress, like Nancy Pelosi, who vetted the usurper as president. That makes them guilty of conspiring to usurp the government. Yes, that means they would be wanted under suspect of TREASON.
What I want to know is where the ACLU and ACLJ are on this? Where are the lawyers fighting this instead of the birth certificate? Why do we keep beating a loosing battle when the answer has been in front of us the whole time? Why don’t we put together a class action suit about this? This is also something that both Republicans and Democrats, Birthers and Liberals, can get behind as long as they still believe in the US Constitution. Has anyone wondered why, other then his total disregard for law, he wants people to think the Constitution is flawed?
Now, I have seen poster after poster of calling the Sgt. of Arms in the Senate at  (202) 224-2341 . Truth is that the Sergeant of Arms is only responsible for Congress and can not arrest the president unless the House voted to impeach. He can however arrest the people that illegally vetted a usurper, and as it turn out, many of them, like Dianne Feinstein, and Nancy Pelosi, are still there. We can always call him and say we want them arrested for possible treason. If he will do it or not,  I don’t know, but it would keep him busy and is his job.
As for the Usurper, well there is plenty that people can do that does not result in bloodshed or violence. I’ll have more on that later.  Meanwhile, spread the word. It’s not every day we find out that everyone was right but just not looking in the right place. We the People have a phone and a pen as well to get the message out. We also have the internet.  Let us know what you think about all this in the comments below.

OBAMA ASHAMED OF AMERICA DUE TO GUN VIOLENCE! FUCK YOU GO TO HELL YOU GIVE TERROIORIST WEAPONS TO KILL US AND OUR TROOPS EVERY NATION IN THE WORLD SHOULD BE KICKING YOUR DOOR IN

OBAMA ASHAMED OF AMERICA DUE TO GUN VIOLENCE!

Let’s start this off by saying that America is ashamed of Obama for…pretty much everything so the feeling is mutual. There’s an Associated Press story that virtually everyone is running about how Obama is trying to shame us into accepting more restrictions on our already too restricted right to keep and bear arms. Even for Obama it is sickening.

President Obama said Tuesday the nation should do “some soul-searching”: over its epidemic of deadly gun violence and “should be ashamed” it has been unable to address it.

I did some soul searching (Google actually) and it turns out that this epidemic of gun violence is a creation of the media that latches on to certain stories to promote an anti-gun agenda. Violent crime is actually declining and has been since the early 1990’s. This includes “gun violence,” murder and assault.

“We’re the only developed country on Earth where this happens,” Obama said during a question-and-answer session on the social media website Tumblr.

Didn’t Canada just have a mass shooting last week where 3 police officers were killed? Doesn’t China suffer mass killings on a regular basis? Gun-free zones like England and Australia have a higher violent crime rate than the US. Much of the developed world suffers high murder per capita rates than we do. What a complete liar.

“And it happens now once a week,” Obama added. “And it’s a one-day story. There’s no place else like this.”

We’re about 23 weeks into 2014. Have we had 23 mass shootings this year? Also, what media sources does Obama consult? The ones I follow have a tendency to not let go of any shooting story. They don’t disappear; they are drilled into our consciousness.

His “biggest frustration” as president, Obama said, has been that “this society has not been willing to take some basic steps” to keep guns away from people who “can do just unbelievable damage.”

Really? With all of the terrible things Obama has done as president and not passing some minor gun control legislation is his biggest frustration. No wonder he does things like trade 5 Taliban fighters for a deserter. His priorities are completely out of whack.

CONTINUE READING AT DOWNTREND!

ISIS just stole $425 million, Iraqi governor says, and became the ‘world’s richest terrorist group’ NO THERE ARE NOT OBAMA IS HE STOLE ALL THE MONEY FROM THE USA AND ALL THE NATIONS HE RAPED AND ROBED

ISIS just stole $425 million, Iraqi governor says, and became the ‘world’s richest terrorist group’

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 193
• More

By Terrence McCoy June 12 at 5:02 AM Follow @terrence_mccoy

An image grab taken from a propaganda video uploaded on June 8, 2014, by the jihadist group the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. (AFP/Getty Images)

Of the many stunning revelations to emerge out of the wreckage of Mosul on Wednesday — 500,000 fleeing residents, thousands of freed prisoners, unconfirmed reports of “mass beheadings” — the one that may have the most lasting impact as Iraq descends into a possible civil war is that the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria just got extremely rich.
As insurgents rolled past the largest city in northern Iraq, an oil hub at the vital intersection of Syria, Iraq and Turkey, and into Tikrit, several gunmen stopped at Mosul’s central bank. An incredible amount of cash was reportedly on hand, and the group made off with 500 billion Iraqi dinars — $425 million.
The provincial governor of Nineveh, Atheel al-Nujaifi, said that the radical Islamists had lifted additional millions from numerous banks across Mosul, as well as a “large quantity of gold bullion,” according to the International Business Times, which called ISIS the “World’s Richest Terror Force.”
The declaration isn’t an easy one to fact-check. Not only is the definition of “terrorist” nebulous — are murderous but wealthy Mexican cartels terrorists? — it’s also exceedingly difficult to quantify a terrorist organization’s finances. One of the closest stabs anyone has made comes from the well-versed Money Jihad.
According to its analysis, which drew on journalistic and academic accounts, the cash seizure would make ISIS the richest terrorist organization in the world — at least for the time being.
The Taliban, the New York Times reported, had a one-time annual operating budget of somewhere between $70 million and $400 million. Hezbollah was working with between $200 million and $500 million. FARC in Colombia had annual revenues of $80 million to $350 million. Al-Shabab in Somalia had between $70 million and $100 million socked away. And Al-Qaeda, meanwhile, was working with a $30 million operating budget at the time of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.
The newfound wealth at ISIS’s disposal now makes it richer than many small nations, including Nauru, Tonga and the Marshall Islands.
For a terrorist group that operates more and more like a de facto state governing a huge swath of land spilling across Syria and Iraq, the potential impact could be huge. By nearly every measure, Iraq is embroiled in civil war. With lightning speed, not deterred by Iraqi soldiers running scared, the insurgency on Wednesday moved within 70 miles of Baghdad, which analysts say is “definitely vulnerable,” according to The Washington Post’s Liz Sly and Loveday Morris.
Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki called a national state emergency and said in a televised news conference that “Iraq is undergoing a difficult stage.” He called on everyone in the government “to confront this vicious attack, which will spare no Iraqi.”
Complicating that call to action, however, is ISIS’s money. It will “buy a whole lot of Jihad,” regional analyst Brown Moses wrote on Twitter. “For example, with $425 million, ISIS could pay 60,000 fighters around $600 a month for a year.”
According to research by the intelligence consultancy Soufan Group, ISIS may not have much trouble attracting that many fighters — if it doesn’t have that many already. Soufan Group said ISIS has attracted 12,000 militants from abroad already, 3,000 of whom are from the West.
Iraqi government forces, meanwhile, appear deflated and disillusioned. “The state is weak,” one infantryman told the New York Times. “This will be an endless battle.”
Another officer conceded to the Independent that “we can’t beat them. They’re trained in street fighting and we’re not. We need a whole army to drive them out of Mosul. They’re like ghosts; they appear to hit and disappear within seconds.”

Iraqi officials stress need for al-Qaida-inspired militants to be pushed out. They are calling on residents of Mosul to help Iraqi troops in fight against terrorist attacks.

Terrence McCoy is a foreign affairs writer at the Washington Post. He served in the U.S. Peace Corps in Cambodia and studied international politics at Columbia University. Follow him on Twitter here.

“The World Is Horrible – The World Is Great” – So Says Barack Obama…

UlstermanBooks.com > Politics > “The World Is Horrible – The World Is Great” – So Says Barack Obama…

Two statements made within 48 hours of one another by the same individual, and seemingly in complete contradiction with each other.
Welcome to the Age of Obama, where words mean nothing, and truth even less…

First up are the president’s recent comments on just how “bad’ gun violence in American has become:


“America is plagued by off the charts gun violence and school shootings which happen now once a week.” 

Ah, but wait!  When asked a question about his own impact upon the world today, here is what President Duplicitous had to say:


“If you had to choose any moment to be born in human history, not knowing what your position was going to be, who you were going to be, you’d choose this time. The world is less violent than it has ever been. It is healthier than it has ever been. It is more tolerant than it has ever been. It is better fed then it’s ever been. It is more educated than it’s ever been.”

Huh?  What about all the horrible gun violence and school shootings Mr. President?  How can one be so bad, and yet, you say how everything is seemingly so good?  Sir, you wouldn’t simply be blabbering self-serving politics would you?  Say it ain’t so Mr. President!

And perhaps your National Security Team should let you know what’s going on in say, oh I don’t know, IRAQ?????

Is the Obama State Department Following Shariah Law Over U.S. Law in Refusing to Acknowledge Meriam’s Kids’ Citizenship?

By
Matthew Clark Filed in:
United Nations 3:26 PM Jun. 4, 2014

Tweet

The Obama Administration’s State Department has been dragging its heels, refusing to acknowledge that the children of the woman on death row in Sudan for her Christian faith are U.S. citizens.
Those two young American children – including a newborn infant – are imprisoned with their mother, Meriam Ibrahim.  Their human rights are being violated on a daily basis, and the State Department’s response has been abysmal.
It is a basic principle of American law that the child of a U.S. citizen is a U.S. citizen.  As long as at least one parent is a citizen (and meets basic residency requirements which don’t appear to be at issue here) when that child is born, under U.S. law, the child is also a citizen.
That is a basic and indisputable fact.  It’s not complicated.
It is also now undisputed that Wani, Meriam’s husband, is a U.S. citizen.  Finally, the  State Department confirmed this fact on Monday, stating unequivocally, “We do have Privacy Act waiver for Mr. Wani at this time, who I can confirm is a U.S. citizen, as has been reported.”
Yet the State Department still refuses to acknowledge that Meriam and Wani’s children are U.S. citizens.
The only possible complication in establishing the U.S. citizenship of their children – 20-month-old Martin and newborn baby girl Maya – is in proving to the U.S. government that Martin and Maya are, in fact, Wani’s children.
The U.S. State Department is making onerous and legally unnecessary demands for proof, outside of what is required by U.S. law.
Again the legal analysis isn’t that complicated.
Under U.S. law, there is a presumption that children born during a marriage are in fact the children of both the mother and father. That means that since Meriam and Wani are married, the children, Martin and Maya both born during their marriage, are the father’s children, and therefore his U.S. citizenship passes to them.
The only conceivable way that the State Department could require further proof in this case would be if it accepted Sudan’s interpretation of Shariah law essentially annulling their previously recognized marriage.
Is that what is happening here? Is our State Department adopting the false argument of Sudan based on Shariah law?
Under U.S. law, if a child is born out of wedlock, then other forms of proof, such as DNA evidence, are required to establish with clear and convincing evidence that the child is biologically related to the father.
That’s right, for the State Department to demand DNA evidence to prove paternity means, in this case, that the U.S. government would have to follow Shariah law – the very law that has sentenced Meriam to death for apostasy and 100 lashes for adultery (i.e. marrying a Christian man).
That’s exactly what the State Department seems to be doing.  On Monday, the spokesperson for the State Department, Jen Psaki, explained:

Well, there are certain requirements that I just referenced to you that have long been the case, and they’re available on – are on the INA website. To transmit U.S. citizenship to a child born abroad there must be, among other requirements, a biological relationship between the child and a U.S. citizen, a parent or parents. U.S. regulation authorizes the Department to request whatever additional evidence it may need to establish the U.S. citizenship. Genetic testing is a useful tool for verifying a biological relationship. Again, this is all available on our website and is standard operating procedure.

Again, that’s a description of the second way to prove citizenship, only necessary where the children are born out of wedlock.
According to numerous reports, Meriam and Wani were legally married in 2011, in a Christian marriage in Sudan.  It was not until this year that a Sudanese court applied Shariah law, imposing the Islamic religion of her father who abandoned her on her, convicted her of apostasy, and ignored her previously legal marriage.  The court essentially used Shariah law to annul what had previously been a legal marriage, claiming that she was a Muslim through her father and not a Christian and thus retroactively could not have legally married a Christian man.
For the U.S. State Department to accept this ruling (the same ruling that sentenced her to torture and then death), it would have to accept Sudan’s interpretation of Shariah law.  That appears to be exactly what is happening, and it’s outrageous.
According to Wani, the U.S. Embassy has refused to help, demanding DNA evidence even though he provided proof that he was married to Meriam.  He said that according to the U.S. Embassy in Khartoum:

“I will have to take a DNA sample in Khartoum, then send it to the USA for testing,” Wani said. “I have provided wedding documents and the baby’s birth certificate, and doors were closed on his face.”
Wani told Morning Star News that when he called the U.S. Embassy on April 9, a representative in Khartoum told him they did not care about the case.
“I have tried to apply for papers to travel to the USA with my wife and child, but the American Embassy in Sudan did not help me,” Wani said.

Now, not only is the U.S. Embassy closing the door in his face, the U.S. State Department appears to be jumping through hoops to follow Shariah law.  Though the marriage to Meriam was legally recognized in Sudan before she was charged, the U.S. seems to be relying on the same charge that convicted her of apostasy – becoming a Christian – in order to deny or at least make it more difficult for her children to have their U.S. citizenship recognized.
Incidentally, Sudan may be acknowledging that Wani is the father of these children because the children themselves may in fact be evidence that was used to convict Meriam of adultery – having sexual relations with a non-Muslim.
Moreover, despite the State Department’s demands for DNA evidence, it has in fact publicly recognized that Meriam and Wani are married on multiple occasions.  Last week, Ms. Psaki referred to Wani as “her husband” in her State Department briefing discussing Meriam, and Monday’s transcript on the State Department’s website has a section entitled “Imprisonment of Meriam Ibrahim / U.S. Engagement with her Husband.”
Meriam and Wani are clearly married. Their children, Martin and Maya, are U.S. citizens.  Yet their own government refuses to acknowledge this fact as they languish in a brutal prison.
The State Department’s treatment of this case is an outrage.  It’s time the Obama Administration’s State Department follow U.S. law, not Shariah law, and fight for these helpless U.S. citizens.
Take action with us by signing our petition at BeHeardProject.com to demand freedom for Meriam and her two American children.
This article is crossposted on Red State.

Tags » Meriam, State Department, Citizens, Sudan

Yo, What's Obama Gotta Do To Get Impeached?

http://patriotaction.net/forum/topic/show?id=2600775%3ATopic%3A6704749&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
Yo, What's Obama Gotta Do
To Get Impeached?
Swear Allegiance to Stalin AND Allah
On LIVE TV?!!
Nixon stole ONE file- Impeached and resigned in disgrace. But NO ONE KILLED.
Obama has multiple scandals, multiple deaths/MURDERS, lies, breaks the law, violates The Constitution at every turn...and...
The House is held by the Republicans, but the Senate is held by The DEMOCRATS and Dingy Harry Reid...and the G.O.P. after what happened when the House impeached Clinton and the Senate let him slide is doing nothing now.
Patriots, Conservatives, It is up to US turn out and VOTE November 4th, 2014 and WIN A STRONG MAJORITY IN THE SENATE and even make gains in The House and impeach and then IMPRISON this fraud and traitor!!!
We can NOT...America can NOT afford for the same 30,000,000"+" Conservative VOTERS to stay home and sulk like cry-babies because they didn't get their "perfect candidate"!!
VOTE!!!
WAKE-UP!
WISE-UP!
RISE-UP!

DHS Islamist tweets enthusiasm for Muslim Brotherhood

DHS Islamist tweets enthusiasm for Muslim Brotherhood

Posted on June 12, 2014 by creeping

via Center for Security Policy | To Tweet Or Not To Tweet? An Islamist Question.
Mohamed Elibiary, a noted Islamist serving as a Senior Fellow on the Department of Homeland Security’s Advisory Council spends a lot of his time on Twitter.
In many of Elibiary’s posts, he queries why some on the right question his patriotism and whether he truly has an interest in stopping terrorists. A quick example of some of his tweets can help answer this question.
Last month Elibiary tweeted his congratulations to the Palestinians for forming a unity government between the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and Hamas:

My personal congrats to the Palestinian people on reconciliation progress & goal of building a UNITY gov http://t.co/2YPmoMz0X4 #Palestine
— Mohamed Elibiary (@MohamedElibiary) April 24, 2014

Moreover, in a recent tweet, Elibiary showed his open enthusiasm when the Muslim Brotherhood (founders of Hamas) announced its support for the unity government:

May God bless… #MuslimBrotherhood welcomes Imminent Declaration of Palestinian Unity Government http://t.co/OjH8yuezLo @Ikhwanweb #MB
— Mohamed Elibiary (@MohamedElibiary) May 28, 2014

First, Hamas is a terrorist organization – they’ve been designated as such by the State Department and everything (#Snark). Hamas is an openly anti-, violent terrorist organization. They have claimed responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of innocent Israelis through the cowardly act of suicide bombing. Moreover, they have never renounced their interest in killing Jews and they still state that they will never recognize Israel.
Moreover, Hamas’ parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood – according to their American branches own Explanatory Memorandum – has been waging a subversive “Civilization jihad” in America in an attempt at “destroying Western civilization from within.”
This is a man who helps craft America’s counter-terrorism policies. Yet he is openly excited that an organization that wants to “destroy Western civilization” decided to support the actions taken by one of their subsidiaries, which advocates killing Jews.
Elibiary’s Islamist sympathies have been exposed in the past.
Additionally, an appropriate Twitter post for a member of the Department of Homeland Security’s Advisory Council to issue on a unity government with Hamas should read a little more like:
‘We need to cut off all aid to the new Palestinian unity government because they are openly uniting with terrorists.’

---

Backposts on Elibiary here.