Sunday, September 21, 2014
Berichte des ukrainischen Präsidenten Putin soll Europa massiv gedroht haben
Berichte des ukrainischen Präsidenten Putin soll Europa massiv gedroht haben
Drohungen gegen Europa? Wladimir Putin bei einer Rede
(Foto: Bloomberg)
Anzeige
Russische Truppen binnen zwei Tagen in Warschau, Riga, Vilnius
oder Bukarest: Kremlchef Wladimir Putin soll dem ukrainischen
Präsidenten Petro Poroschenko gesagt haben, dass seine Armee zügig
osteuropäische Hauptstädte erreichen könnte. Das geht aus einer
Gesprächszusammenfassung der EU hervor, die der "Süddeutschen Zeitung"
vorliegt.
Der russische Präsident Wladimir Putin
hat nach Darstellung des ukrainischen Staatschefs Petro Poroschenko
Drohungen geäußert, die sich gegen Mitgliedsländer der Nato und der
Europäischen Union richten.Laut einer Gesprächszusammenfassung des Auswärtigen Dienstes der Europäischen Union, die der Süddeutschen Zeitung vorliegt, berichtete Poroschenko dem EU-Kommissionspräsidenten José Manuel Barroso am vergangenen Freitag während dessen Besuchs in Kiew von den Drohungen. Wörtlich habe Putin zu ihm, Poroschenko, gesagt: "Wenn ich wollte, könnten russische Truppen in zwei Tagen nicht nur in Kiew, sondern auch in Riga, Vilnius, Tallinn, Warschau oder Bukarest sein."
Ähnlichkeit mit Barroso-Telefonat
Öffentlich hat Putin bislang Mitgliedern der Nato und der EU nicht mit militärischer Gewalt gedroht. Bekannt geworden war aber ein Telefonat Barrosos mit Putin, in dem dieser gesagt haben soll: "Wenn ich wollte, könnte ich Kiew binnen zwei Wochen einnehmen." Barroso hatte den Staats- und Regierungschefs beim EU-Gipfel Ende August von dem Telefonat berichtet. Der Kreml hatte daraufhin kritisiert, dass Barroso den Inhalt eines privaten Telefonats publik gemacht habe.
Anzeige
Putins angebliche Drohung "Ich könnte Kiew in zwei Wochen einnehmen"
Scharfe Töne aus dem Kreml: Laut Informationen der italienischen
Tageszeitung "La Repubblica" soll der russische Präsident Putin
EU-Kommissionspräsident Barroso gedroht haben, er sei in der Lage, Kiew
in kürzester Zeit einzunehmen. Der ukrainische Verteidigungsminister
befürchtet im Krieg gegen Russland "Zehntausende Tote".
Er könne durch bilaterale Kontakte Einfluss nehmen und eine "Sperrminorität" im Europäischen Rat bewirken, die für Russland negative Entscheidungen verhindere, soll Putin demnach gesagt haben.
Putin angeblich Kiews Distanz zu EU wichtiger als Separatismus
Womöglich spielte der Kremlchef damit auf den wachsenden Widerstand im Rat gegen neue Sanktionen an. Mehrere EU-Länder hatten sich angesichts des Waffenstillstandes in der Ukraine zuletzt für ein Abwarten ausgesprochen, eine zweite Runde von Wirtschaftssanktionen war aber dann doch beschlossen und in Kraft gesetzt worden. Solche Beschlüsse erfordern Einstimmigkeit. Länder wie die Slowakei, Bulgarien, Ungarn und Zypern tragen die Sanktionspolitik nur noch widerwillig mit.
Ihr Forum – Muss sich Osteuropa vor Putin fürchten?
Mit der Ratifizierung des Assoziierungsabkommens verabschiedete das ukrainische Parlament am Dienstag auch einen Sonderstatus für die von Separatisten kontrollierten Gebiete.
Vladimir Putin Threatens World War 3, Says Russia Could Invade Europe Within Two Days
Vladimir Putin Threatens World War 3, Says Russia Could Invade Europe Within Two Days
In a related report by The Inquisitr, both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton claim Putin wants to restore Russia to the glory of an empire that spreads across the globe, and even made comparison to Nazi Germany. Hillary does not believe Putin and Hitler can be directly compared, or claim that Putin starting World War 3, but she did make a comparison to how the Nazis used the German minorities in Poland and Czechoslovakia as an excuse to invade. Some say the situation prior to World War 2 is similar to today since “protecting” Russian speaking citizens of Ukraine are used as the justification for intervention in Ukraine.
The rhetoric related to the Ukraine war has been stepping up to a dangerous level in recent weeks. First, Russia’s nuclear weapons were test fired as a demonstration of Russian military might, and then Vladimir Putin promised to rebuild Russia’s nuclear arsenal. In response to recent advances by Russia within Ukrainian territory, Ukraine also threatened to restart its nuclear weapons program.
An influential German newspaper called Sueddeutsche Zeitung is reporting that Vladimir Putin allegedly had a private meeting with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso. During the course of their discussion, Putin essentially threatened World War 3.
“If I wanted, in two days I could have Russian troops not only in Kiev, but also in Riga, Vilnius, Tallinn, Warsaw and Bucharest.”This threat by Putin matches a similar statement allegedly said earlier in the month, in which Russia’s leader proclaimed their military force of 20,000 men camped outside Ukraine’s border could take the capital city Kiev within two weeks. In this case, that threat was expanded to include countries like Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland and Romania.
It’s possible that Putin was indirectly responding to a speech given by U.S. President Barack Obama earlier in the month, who also mentioned some of those NATO members.
“An attack on one is an attack on all. So if, in such a moment, you ever ask again, ‘who will come to help,’ you’ll know the answer – the NATO alliance, including the armed forces of the United States of America,” Obama said. “We’ll be here for Estonia. We will be here for Latvia. We will be here for Lithuania.”
If this alleged conversation between Putin, Poroshenko, and Barroso did take place, it would be the first time Putin has directly threatened members of the European Union and NATO. If Russia were to actually ever act on this threat, it really would mean World War 3 would start since Article V of NATO’s Washington Treaty declares that “an attack on one is an attack on all,” which is what President Obama was referring to in his speech. While both the United States and England have rejected calls to send lethal aid into Ukraine, both countries would be obligated by NATO treaties to respond with military force if Russia’s actions were to ever match Putin’s rhetoric. According to the NATO website, “Article 5 has been invoked once – in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States.”
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1484957/vladimir-putin-threatens-world-war-3-says-russia-could-invade-europe-within-two-days/#E91coAuaEfpHr0IG.99
Three Afghan Military Officers Go Missing in US
Three Afghan Military Officers Go Missing in US
Three Afghan military officers have gone missing while in the United
States for a joint military training exercise at Joint Base Cape Cod,
U.S. military and law enforcement officials said.
They arrived in the country on Sept. 11, and were reported missing by
base security personnel late Saturday. They were last seen at the Cape
Cod Mall in Hyannis, Mass.
A Centcom official told ABC News there is no indication that the Afghan men reported missing pose any threat to the public.
Base and local police and state authorities are working together to
locate the three Afghans. There are still approximately a dozen Afghan
soldiers still participating in the exercise, which ends Sep. 24th.
Massachusetts State Police spokesman David Procopio said the
investigation is being run by the FBI and the Department of Justice, but
Massachusetts state troopers are assisting in "putting the word out"
and searching the area around Camp Edwards.
Just last weekend, two Afghan policemen in the Washington, D.C., for a
DEA training program at Quantico, Va., also went missing while on a
sightseeing trip to Georgetown.
The two men, who were part of a group of 31 Afghan police officers in
the U.S. for the multi-week program, were found safe somewhere outside
of D.C., but officials would not say exactly where, ABC affiliate WJLA-TV reported.
According to WJLA-TV, the DEA said the two men left the group because they did not want to go back to Afghanistan.
Obama and brother named in RICO complaint
Y LINDA BENTLEY | SEPTEMBER 3, 2014
Obama and brother named in RICO complaint
Klayman accuses defendants of “laundering U.S. dollars” through HAMAS to attack Israel, Americans and Israeli-American citizens
WASHINGTON
– Last Thursday, Attorney Larry Klayman (l), founder of Judicial Watch
and Freedom Watch, filed a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations) complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia, naming President Barack Obama, his half-brother Malik Obama
(an officer of the Barack H. Obama Foundation), Secretary of State John
Kerry, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, U.N. Secretary General
Ban Ki-Moon and HAMAS (in Arabic, an acronym for “Harakat Al-Muqawama
Al-Islamia” – Islamic Resistance Movement) as the government of Gaza,
Palestinian Authority.Klayman, who recently won a preliminary ruling in another case against the Obama administration, holding the National Security Agency’s spying on Americans is likely unconstitutional, is accusing defendants of “laundering U.S. dollars” through HAMAS, officially designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. government, for the purchase of rockets and to construct tunnels for the purpose of attacking Israel and terrorizing and killing American and dual American-Israeli citizens in Israel.
Klayman stated, “The nation and the world have increasingly come to see that Obama views himself primarily as a Muslim and acts accordingly in favoring Islamic interests over Judeo-Christian ones, and the complaint lays out Obama’s history in documented detail.”
The complaint alleges defendants have engaged in fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, conversion and corruption.
Klayman was in Israel when HAMAS attacked and said he was subject to terrorist threats, fear, intimidation and blackmail from HAMAS, aimed at coercing him from exercising his legal rights in violation of the Hobbs Act in an attempt to deny his freedom to travel and conduct public advocacy, business and other activities in Israel, using threats and intimidation to try to get Klayman to leave Israel and disengage with Israel.
The complaint alleges the defendants conspired to send hundreds of millions of dollars to HAMAS under the pretense the financial support would be used for humanitarian purposes.
It was recently confirmed, however, by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) that some of those U.S. dollars were found in the bombed chief HAMAS financial officer’s car have fallen into the hands of HAMAS’ terrorist arm, elected by the citizens of Gaza to govern them.
According to the complaint, just seven months before the Benghazi attacks, Clinton asked Congress to authorize a $770 million “slush fund,” which she called “The Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund,” to be used at her discretion anywhere in North Africa or the Middle East.
Clinton insisted the funds be “flexible and easily employed” without providing any specifics as to how the money would be used.
Clinton then caused the money from that slush fund to flow to both HAMAS and the Muslim Brotherhood with the knowledge those funds would be used to buy arms and other military equipment to be used against Israel, Jews and Christians.
Klayman alleges the State Department has not provided any official report or account of how that money was used.
The complaint states, “On information and belief, Hillary Clinton directed that activities at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and nearby CIA Annex to transfer weapons previously poured into Libya and liberated from the Libyan military to Muslim Brotherhood groups in the Middle East, including in Syria (to what is now ISIS / ISIL) and HAMAS in Gaza.”
Klayman states in his complaint that HAMAS and the Muslim Brotherhood, HAMAS’ umbrella parent organization, are “agenda driven,” seeking to achieve their own self-initiated political and territorial goals, rather than “grievance driven” in response to actions by other nations or groups, despite their efforts to use grievences in their propaganda.
He notes the charter of HAMAS calls for the destruction of Israel and the establishment of an Islamic state in place of Israel.
Klayman alleges HAMAS asked defendants for and received funds and other support from the United States of America under the apparent guise it was for humanitarian aid for the people living in Gaza but used those funds instead to finance and carry out its pattern and practice of violent crimes, murder and terrorism.
The lawsuit documents the founding of HAMAS in late 1987 by the late Sheik Ahmad Yasinat as part of the first Palestinian Intifada (uprising) to replace the Palestinian Liberation Organization with a more radical, militant alternative and stated HAMAS is a Palestinian branch of the worldwide Muslim Brotherhood.
Quoting from various sources, Klayman also states HAMAS is not seeking to co-exist and compromise; it is willing to sacrifice as many Palestinian lives as it takes to achieve its goal of conquering the globe and building an Islamic state on every inch of the globe.
Destruction of Israel is not its final goal. The final goal is to build an Islamic caliphate by wiping out all other civilizations.
Klayman states it is unknown whether the president has given Malik Obama permission to use his name but also said no effort has been made by the president to discourage the authority of Malik Obama to be raising funds under the name of the Barack H. Obama Foundation.
Klayman points out he could have run the Malik Obama Foundation but didn’t, thus he is leading people to believe his efforts are sanctioned by his brother, the president of the United States.
Malik received an IRS determination letter dated June 11, 2011, granting him retroactive tax-exempt status, but only after it became public he had been operating as a 501(c) 3 foundation since 2008 without ever applying to the IRS.
According to the complaint, “Defendant Malik Obama raises funding and other support both through the Barack H. Obama Foundation and through other organizations to facilitate violence, terrorism, and warfare carried out by HAMAS as a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood and by the Muslim Brotherhood generally.”
Klayman states two leaked classified documents reveal Egyptian security forces have been monitoring Malik Obama’s activities, while also implicating President Obama, Clinton and her husband, former president Bill Clinton in the aiding and abetting of terrorists.
A photo of Malik Obama at a conference in Yemen in 2010, shows him wearing a scarf displaying the slogan, “Jerusalem is ours – We are coming.”
This would lead one to believe Malik Obama specifically supports the goal of Muslim occupation and possession of Jerusalem while supporting HAMAS violence as a means of taking Jerusalem from the Jews and Israel for the benefit of HAMAS.
Klayman accuses the defendants of providing material support to the preparation and carrying out of numerous acts of international terrorism and as a result of such support to terrorist groups, they have violated the law of nations, established U.S. law, international laws, treaties and norms.
Klayman is seeking an award in excess of $500 million or $1.5 billion in trebled damages, punitive damages and other relief the court may deem just and proper.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)