| ||||||
|
Finally,
after years of negotiations, the major countries of the Islamic
Republic have reached an agreement on Iran's nuclear program at the end
of marathon talks in Geneva. Agreement, which was announced the dawn of November 24 to respect Iran's right to acquire nuclear knowledge states. Will
ease the sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic gradually, including
economic sanctions, which will disappear after six months from the
signing of the agreement.
I've
been Declaration agreement during a press conference attended by
Iranian negotiators, led by Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, and
the foreign ministers of the six countries, as well as EU foreign
minister Catherine Ashton, that followed in the United Nations
headquarters in Geneva a joint declaration includes an agreement on a
plan work on the Iranian nuclear program, marking the six major powers
reach an agreement with Iran to solve its nuclear program.
Reactions on the agreement
Iranian
Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said that the nuclear agreement
is an important result, but it is only a first step, hoping that the
parties will be able to progress in a way that allows re confidence.
Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, welcomed the agreement, expressing
confidence in Iran's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy
Agency, pointing out that the agreement means that "we agree on the need
to recognize Iran's right for peaceful atom, including the right to
enrichment." Lavrov
stressed that the nuclear deal may be reflected positively on the
Syrian crisis .. US President Barack Obama welcomed the agreement,
saying it is an important first step, stressing that no sanctions on
Iran during the six months if committed by agreement.
For his part, US Secretary of State John Kerry said that the agreement on the nuclear program will make the world safer.
In
turn, French President Francois Hollande, welcomed the agreement,
regarding it as an important step in the right direction, and thus
towards the "normalization of our relations with Iran." French
Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius also hailed the Geneva agreement,
describing it as an important progress on the path to peace and
security.
As
described by German Foreign Minister Guido faster Philly Geneva
agreement a turning point, Syria welcomed the agreement, which it
described as historic, and considered the Syrian Foreign Ministry that
Israel remains the only obstacle to a world free of weapons of mass
destruction Middle East.
Chairman
of the enemy government, Benjamin Netanyahu denounced the agreement,
describing the historical error and bad matter, while his foreign
minister, Avigdor Lieberman, said that the agreement represents a major
diplomatic victory for Iran years ago.
Maybe
a new regional scene is taking shape in the region after the agreement
reached by the Islamic Republic of Iran on its nuclear program with six
world powers, especially with regard to the Syrian crisis. The
agreement is a new stage in the Western relationship with Iran, are
supposed to reflect on the relationship between Iran and the countries
of the region.
Islamic
Republic of Iran have succeeded in concluding an agreement on its
nuclear program, which in this success has imposed itself as a player
regionally and internationally will have an important active role in
finding solutions to the outstanding issues in the region, particularly
the Syrian crisis.
Crown transcendence time .. America is reaching out to Iran!
Crown
acerbic remarks time, threats and directing is no longer a military
strike against Tehran useless, this scene is a summary of recent
American policy direction of Iran. Talk
now, revolves around the American-Iranian rapprochement, and open a new
page in relations between the two countries, visits between the two
countries, officials openly, and telephone contact between US President
Barack Obama with Iranian President Hassan Rohani in a gesture is the
first of its kind since the Islamic revolution in Iran 1979.
The
question arises: What is the secret behind America's rush toward the
"Tehran" and alleviate the confrontation with them after years of
historical animosity between the two countries?
Many
believe that the recent events in the region and the inability of
Washington for a military strike on Syria and placed in an awkward
position. America,
the most powerful military state in the world, did not dare to commit
"Follies" in Syria, especially after the strong statements of Syria's
allies (Russia, Iran).
American
retreat from the strike in spite of possessing marine fleets did not
come only after deep and careful studies, and possibly US officials saw
the futility directing such a strike because they will not achieve any
benefits for them.
What is known is that the US influence in the region vanished away. I
have shaken America and implicated after entering Iraq, and here now
get involved more and lose their balance in the region, especially after
the growing influence of the axis of "resistance and opposition," and
therefore America has held that there is no room to open a new page with
Iran, and to improve the relationship dramatically with Tehran.
It
has nothing to do specifically with President Hassan Rohani, described
as the head of a moderate, unlike the previous counterpart Ahmadinejad,
since each stage her experiences .. and Ahmadinejad play its role to the
fullest, and was the right man to stand against American threats and
Astalaúha on others. If
America wants to reach out to Iran to have done before, especially in
the era of former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami, the president is
known as the most moderate of all Iranian presidents, but did not do so,
as Saudi Arabia did not do in spite of attempts by Khatami convergence
hard with it. America
has realized that it is pointless war and threats of assault on others,
and also the feasibility of sanctions and beaten with an iron fist, The
year 2013 is different than others, and the world is now before the new
system is not where America is the strongest.
Locally
will be American - Iranian rapprochement many gains, would be "breaking
the embargo" imposed on Iran, the most prominent result of this
convergence, which is beneficial to the Iranian economy.
And
the Arab world, will be less units Arab hostility to Iran, and will be
forced American allies of Arab States to deal with Iran as a "friendly
country", and thus Cetkmm the mouths of these direction of Iran's
nuclear program, as will stop Saudi Arabia from the use of "sectarian
card" and hit the Arabs disagreements sectarian (Sunni, Shia) In order
to deepen the hatred for the Iranians.
American-Iranian
rapprochement does not mean Iran to give up its Arab allies and the
Russians, Vmhor "resistance and opposition" will increase the strength
and hardness, and will result in a lot of resolving Arab differences.
In the region, the more wary of this convergence is Israel. Netanyahu explained that publicly and said he would seek to reduce this convergence.
According
to Israeli media reports that the Prime Minister of the State of the
failure of the US occupation will be remembered their contacts with
North Korea, and the US side will say that it is better not to reach any
agreement.
The
Israelis want to be "Tehran" in the range of "American anger," Iran is
the only country in the Middle East region, which constitutes a real
threat, as well as the great supporter of the Palestinian and Lebanese
resistances, and the interests of the Zionists is a continuation of
US-Iranian hostility and the lack of any rapprochement. We
are, then, in front of new developments, but the outcome of these
results undoubtedly in the interest of the axis of resistance and
opposition, which adds another victory against the other axis.
Nuclear deal to slap a new Israel
Interim
Agreement between the Islamic Republic and the group form (5 +1) over
Tehran's nuclear program, a new slap to Tel Aviv, which is reflected by
senior political leaders and security statements, as well as the Media
that the enemy, which began to focus on the monitoring of these
statements and the campaign of anger and criticism of Washington's
direction . This
anger shows the existence of a serious Israeli fears of a change in the
form of the international map, after the deal, which would give Iran
the real weight in the region and the world.
Israel has launched a diplomatic campaign aimed at eliminating what it considers a bad deal with Iran on its nuclear program. The
campaign included phone calls directly between Netanyahu and a number
of Western leaders to persuade them to refrain from any hasty agreement
that does not lead to the desired goal completely stop Tehran from
enriching uranium. One
of those leaders objected responded by saying, "From our perspective,
these negotiations and this transaction is a positive development."
Israeli
Prime Minister Netanyahu did not miss a single opportunity to express
their opposition to resolve between Tehran and major powers to end the
nuclear crisis. Highlighted
the emergence of Netanyahu was his speech to the annual meeting of the
Jewish Federation of North America, when the face Speaking to attend,
describing the agreement as a serious and affect the existence of the
Jews, and then asked, "Do you want it?", Came to answer "no", Netanyahu
said then, "If Feltvalo something about the subject. "
Netanyahu's
opposition to any deal with Iran had backfired and led to securing a
satisfactory agreement for the American side and the West. But
Netanyahu, risking the possibility of deterioration of the
distinguished relations between Israel and the United States if the
negotiations fail, which could lead to a military confrontation, then
Netanyahu will bear the responsibility.
Israeli
comments on the nuclear agreement in Geneva was least of which is the
expression of disappointment, because the approval of all attempts to
topple obstruction pursued by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and put
Iran on the nuclear threshold.
Media
that the enemy and began counting the Israeli casualties and how
Netanyahu's efforts went in vain, although the French respond to him. Maariv
newspaper considered that the loss is the largest in the exclusion of
the military option off the table what it means loss of $ 11 billion
spent by Israel on the setting for this option, because Iran graduated
from the battle without being attacked or disintegration of its nuclear
program or the fall of the regime.
Israeli
newspapers focused on the post-agreement with respect to the growing
regional role of Iran in the region and carrying out a key role in
regional arrangements, in exchange for Israeli influence diminished.
In
the same context, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman warned
that the recognition of Iran's right to enrich uranium would lead to a
dangerous and crazy nuclear arms race in the Middle East race.
Strained relations between Washington and Tel Aviv
The
relationship between Israel and the United States are ambiguous, the
dispute is about this time is the first step in the nuclear deal with
Iran. The
current crisis is already one of the largest eruptions of anger in
relations between the United States and Israel, has been getting worse
before it gets better. Since
Menachem Begin, Ronald Reagan rejected a peace plan in 1982, did not
criticize Israel, that any American diplomatic initiative a major
publicity.
In
a rousing speech on November 10, it came Netanyahu to invite Jewish
leaders in the United States to exploit their influence to stop what he
called a bad deal with Iran.
Has
never ascended the Foreign Minister of US podium in an Arab capital to
draw a warning to the Israeli prime minister to stop interfering in the
American diplomatic efforts, and provide a critique until after the
agreement was reached. This is what John Kerry in a remarkable news conference held to consider in November 11 in the United Arab Emirates.
There are three main aspects to criticize Israel for the policy of the United States, Iran's direction are:
1. The terms of the strategy:
Israel is concerned that the US administration has quietly abandoned
its insistence that Iran suspend all enrichment activities, so that the
goal is no longer to put an end to this enrichment.
2. The terms of tactics: Israel fears that the agreement in Geneva would not lead to any decline in the capabilities of Iran's uranium enrichment.
3. In practice: Israel has complained of not carrying out the details of the Geneva agreement before accomplished.
What
exacerbates things, and that Washington and Tel Aviv are suffering from
a crisis of confidence parallel to the peace process between the
Palestinians and the Zionists.
Some
err when seen tensions between Washington and Tel Aviv on the Iranian
nuclear program as an additional chapter of the differences between
Obama and Netanyahu, the tension between the United States and Israel
stems from disagreements over a deeper respect national interests
between the two countries. The
Israeli government considers any preliminary agreement on Iran's
nuclear program is a gift from the US administration to the Iranian
government, which spent the past two decades in the construction of an
expanded nuclear program threatens to Tehran to obtain a nuclear bomb,
in the opinion of Israel.
The
Israeli officials persuaded the US Congress against the White House and
proceed to impose additional sanctions on Iran, and a gold member of
the Senate as far as accusing Kerry of pursuing an anti-Israel line. The
rising voice of Israel in the face of the issue it considers a threat
to its existence is not surprising, but this is a coordinated campaign
to derail the agreement with Iran gives the impression that Israel
Tthriq of the war, demanding the US administration put Israel's
interests above the interests of Washington.
France tried to block Iranian nuclear deal
Secret
negotiations resulted in an agreement in principle reached by the
Iranians and the Americans, which Laurent Fabius, French Foreign
Minister to defer payment of all his appointments and go directly to
Geneva, where he expressed his pessimism has taken place. Then, is no longer room for doubt that it comes to an offensive strategy by the French minister. Fabius, said, "There are beaten with sticks, we want to avoid to achieve half the victory." The
Fabius's comments, which quickly circulated and news agencies have been
strained scenes Inter Continental Hotel, where the delegates were
holding consultations in various respects, and that was the first time
you go out to the public about specific points of the agreement. Then, there is no longer only talk about the obstruction of the French talks.
Rose
American act did not wait too long, as expressed by one of the members
of the delegation accompanying John Kerry in an interview with some
journalists saying, "The Americans and the European Union and the
Iranians are working hard together months ago to this proposal, and this
is only an attempt by Fabius to show himself that he linked to the
negotiations in including late stage. "
These
statements came back and repeated the French foreign minister twice
after the plenary session of the negotiations, the statements had drawn
attention to it, especially since Fabius was the only one who spoke
publicly, and most of the time against the current, clearly registered
differentiation.
Tehran,
President Tweets Rohani came on (Twitter) "Make no mistake, the Cold
War mentality zero-sum, and lead to the loss of everyone." But the agreement seemed to be out from behind bars. The hit sticks, they were resumed in November 20 with the recent resumption of negotiations.
The
position requires France was a real anger if he had already had an
opportunity weaker agreement between Iran and America, but the French
position and a chance to make the conclusion of the agreement between
the two largest.
The position of France has the approval and acceptance of the neo-conservatives in Washington. The
US administration has wondered: Why France take it upon themselves to
slow the momentum of the negotiations with Iran, although it is in a
state of war with Tehran to occur, the Washington will bear the bulk of
the cost? France, like other players in the Iranian drama has dubious motives.
During
a visit by French President Francois Hollande, the Zionist entity, put
four conditions to reach a solution with Iran over its nuclear program
are:
1. Full nuclear facilities under international control mode immediately.
2 - suspension of uranium enrichment by 20%.
3. The reduction of the existing inventory.
4. stop building the Arak reactor.
Hollande
confirmed that negotiations always remains better than resorting to
force with Iran, adding that the goal is to completely abandon France
Iran for nuclear weapons.
New regional architecture
Last
summer, President Barack Obama asked the national security adviser,
Susan Rice, a list of core interests in the Middle East, the result was
two items. First,
is the entity that talks between the enemy and the Palestinians,
despite the fact that everyone in the US administration realizes the
long-term it a shot.
The
second item, is to follow the nuclear diplomacy with Iran, which has
long been a priority, because the only alternatives of successful
negotiations are war or Iran's possession of nuclear weapons.
After
a number of rounds of negotiations with the Iranian president, Sheikh
Hassan Rohani and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, there was
optimistic in the US administration believe that the big strategic
opportunity can be grasped at this level.
It seems that America will not play the role of policeman in the Middle East in the future. Has
begun to talk about a new regional architecture, in addition to
questioning the traditional strategic accounts in the region, which is
heading toward destabilizing the existing balance of power in decades,
which worries Saudi Arabia and Israel alike.
There
is a change in the basis of the direction of US policy on the region's
current variables, this change is based on three priorities: the
negotiations with Iran, pay negotiations between Israel and the
Palestinians, and the search for a political solution to the crisis in
Syria.
These
priorities are set by Susan Rice, the national security adviser, in her
article, where he explained that the goal of this policy is to avoid
sinking of President of the United States in the recurrent crises in the
Middle East, at a time when there are other bets, such as those that
appear in Asia, which require attention. Perhaps
the most striking indicator of this policy is the negotiations, which
began with Tehran, which constitutes an essential element of this
transformation, the simple act for these negotiations should be on the
countries in the region to look at the consequences of the agreement.
The first expressed displeasure of the new US policy is to Saudi Arabia. Saudi
situation is in conformity with the Israeli position in this regard,
because there is an implicit agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel,
even though they were not be living formal relations, but there are
frequent informal contacts have become official if needed. Saudi
Arabia recognizes that the US deal with Iran, not only in order to
obtain assurances about its nuclear program, but it has to do with the
recognition of Iran's regional role, and this is what worries Saudi
Arabia and paid to support the armed groups in Syria and to consider
their relationship with al-Qaeda that is secondary.
 | |||||
Saturday, November 1, 2014
Iranian nuclear agreement in Geneva
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment