Rick Warren invokes the name of Islamic Jesus at Obama Inauguration
Just When I Thought I Could Say “Amen”…
By Eric Barger
www.ericbarger.com
There
I was, watching all of the regalia of the presidential inauguration.
The crowds, the dignitaries, wondering if at any second a Muslim
terrorist would be able to breech the heavy security try something
unthinkable. Praise the Lord it all went relatively well. Of course, I
was also waiting to see just what kind of prayer Rick Warren had
co-opted to pray for the new incoming President and his administration.
There was good cheer and lots of non-partisan wishes, including copious
amounts of slightly sickening back slapping. Politics as usual was for
at least a short time partially on hold anyway.
When Rick Warren
was introduced I and many listened intently. Christians hoped for the
best and prayed. Atheist sat poised with the ACLU on speed dial ready to
cry foul should Warren actually mention the dreaded politically
incorrect "J" word - Jesus. Others, having been mis-educated in
government schools, wondered whose idea it was to have someone pray
anyway. After all, those old guys who started this country really
weren't religious, right? Or at least that's what the history teacher
back in high school said just before the lecture on how only zealots
would be so nutty as to hold to all those outdated notions like "One
Nation Under God." But, I digress...
Frankly, I'd never before
heard Dr. Warren express himself so passionately. No wonder. I'd be on
an adrenalin rush too if I knew people in nearly every country in the
world were watching. I kept thinking, "Come on Warren. Don't wimp out
now." As much as I disagree with his philosophy and so much of what he
has said and written (or omitted) in his books, I was truly rooting for
him to not pray some generic prayer that the openly gay Episcopalian
Bishop, Gene Robinson, would be proud of.
The inaugural prayer
was proceeding along and Warren was rightly praying for God to lead and
protect Obama. Though he didn't petition God as I have to "put a hook in
Barak's nose to make him accomplish the will of the Lord," I honestly
did appreciate what Warren prayed - at least to a point.
So, just
when I thought I could say "amen," it happened. Warren said "I humbly
ask this in the name of the one who changed my life, Yeshua, Isa, Jesus
[Spanish pronunciation], Jesus, who taught us to pray, "Our father who
art in Heaven..." Opppsss. Wait a minute. I should have known that it
was too good to be true. Yeshua and Jesus - great! "Isa" - not so much.
I
have researched Islam for many years. Last year I ministered concerning
the history, theology and intentions of Islam over 40 times in churches
and conferences so naturally, Warren's use of the name of Isa, the
false Jesus of Islam, was a glaring slap in the face to all that he had
already prayed. "Isa" in no way represents the Jesus of the Bible but is
instead the false Jesus of the Qur'an (Koran) and the Muslim Hadith.
"Isa"
(pronounced "eee-sa") is the Islamic Jesus who was but a prophet and
who certainly did not experience a sacrificial death on a cross let
alone resurrect from the dead. In fact, in Islam the prophet Isa is
actually the destroyer of Christianity - not it’s Savior. Obviously,
this is simply NOT the same Jesus as is Yeshua. Thus far, only one
person has written me to comment on Warren's statement. (Hats off to
Diana in Ohio who did her homework.) She also noted a good page from a
website we have linked to for quite some time (www.answering-islam.org)
which highlights the differences between the Jesus of the Bible and the
Isa of Islam. I have placed a link to this resource at the bottom of
this article.
The Apostle Paul emphatically warned about those who would come presenting counterfeit Jesus'.
"But
I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his
subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is
in Christ. For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have
not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not
received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well
bear with him." (II Cor. 11:3-4)
Instead of becoming spiritually
sharper in these perilous days, it would seem that alarming numbers in
the Christian world are instead drifting further out to sea. Many have
adopted the misconceived notion that any mention of the word "God" must
automatically mean that Jehovah is being referred to. This confusion is
even more obvious when the name "Jesus" comes into play. Regardless of
the fact that Mormonism's "Jesus" isn't the biblical Jesus or that
Islam's Isa is just another spiritual deception many Christians appear
unequipped to give an apologetic defense of even basic Christian
beliefs. The bulk of the church has adopted sloppy study habits and even
worse, the majority in the pews are slowly being seduced into accepting
ideas that run clearly counter to the absolute truth of Christianity.
There is little heed to Paul's admonition to "test everything." found in
II Thessalonians 5 let alone to call out those who are leading the
flock down the garden path with half truths and often blatant errors.
Many are sadly just chicken when it comes to insisting on the pure
proclamation of Jesus Christ. Remember, close is only good enough when
playing horseshoes and hurling hand grenades.
This now brings us
to another problem with Warren's inaugural prayer. The word Jesus was
spoken but where was Christ? Though he didn't miss including the name of
the demonic anti-Christian deity Isa, did anyone else notice that
during his prayer Warren did not invoke the Messianic title of "Christ?"
There is only one "Christ" and these days without specificity the name
Jesus could just as easily refer to countless Hispanic kids with the
same name. Though he'll probably never comment, one has to wonder about
Warren's inclusion of Isa and exclusion of Christ. They both make sense
if you're looking for finely tuned political correctness with a twist of
veiled one-world religion.
Does Dr. Warren not know about Isa?
If he truly doesn't then shame on him. Rick Warren accepted the false
premise that Jehovah and Allah are the same deity when he joined in
signing "Loving God and Neighbor Together: A Christian Response to a
Common Word Between us and You" with a number of ill-advised liberals,
heretics and pseudo-evangelicals at Yale University in 2007. Supposing
that Jehovah and Allah are one is certainly the affirmation of a form of
limited universalism at best. I won't revisit all of that here but from
judging the contents of his inaugural prayer it is obvious that Dr.
Warren hasn't amended his position. (See my articles "I Can't Sign the
Letter", "Their God is NOT our God." and "Evangelical Meltdown - Islam
and Christianity at Yale")
My friends, I perceive that the "Isa
incident" we witnessed at the 2009 presidential inauguration to be just
the sort of misleading theological shenanigans that will occur as the
Antichrist becomes prominent. The Bible doesn't seem to indicate that
the Antichrist's rise to power will be iron fisted. Instead, it could be
somewhat incremental, maybe subtle and without a doubt very crafty.
This is similar to what we are seeing today lead by Warren and the gang -
a little inclusiveness here; a little universalism there; don't commit
to any absolutes; just smile and say "God bless you" and pretty soon the
spiritual discernment of the majority is glazed over like a donut and
the seduction becomes fully blown. It's talk the talk to those who want
to hear Christian rhetoric and sing a different tune when the world is
watching. When you listen to the Warren's, Osteen's and Schuller's
around us you get a sense of just how truly sidetracked and noncommittal
some in the alleged evangelical Church have already become. Instead of
focusing on the souls of mankind, it would appear that the end goal is
to be non-confrontational to other religions and non-offensive to as
many people in society as possible - even at the cost of absolute truth.
It is sick and yet many of our friends and loved ones are buying what
these guys are selling and then think that we're nut cases for
insistently being so "narrow."
Though I am not saying that any of
the people mentioned in this article is the actual Man of Sin himself,
we had better listen very carefully when someone stands up to pray. This
is especially so when the one praying claims to be an "evangelical" and
his prayer is to be offered before an audience of a billion+ people
worldwide. Words like "sincere,” "passionate,” "persuasive" have been
written today in describing Warren's inaugural prayer. Before being
swept up in the hype however, remember that these words are being used
to describe someone whose ideology insists that Christianity, its God
and its Savior are somehow allied with a demonic god and the pure evil
which is found in Islam.
For information on Isa visit: http://www.answering-islam.org/Intro/islamic_jesus.html
Copyright Eric Barger, 2009
No comments:
Post a Comment