White House: We didn't threaten victims' families about paying Islamic State ransom
1:22 PM, September 14, 2014
|
Comments
After speaking with U.S. President Barack Obama by phone, John and Diane Foley talk to reporters, Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2014, outside their home in Rochester, N.H. Their son James Foley was abducted in November 2012 while covering the Syrian conflict. Islamic militants posted a video showing his murder and said they killed him because the U.S. had launched airstrikes in northern Iraq. / Associated Press
White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough is denying claims that
the administration threatened legal action against the families of
kidnapped Americans if they paid ransom to their captors, the Islamic
State.
McDonough hit a series of Sunday interview shows to promote the administration’s counter-terrorism plan against the Islamic State, including a plea to Congress to fund anti-IS forces in Syria.
The families of James Foley and Steven Sotloff -- American journalists beheaded by the Islamic State -- said the government objected when they considered ransom payments, and even threatened prosecution.
“We didn’t threaten anybody, but we made clear what the law is,” McDonough said on “Fox News Sunday.” “That’s our responsibility to make sure we explain the law and uphold the law.”
■ Related: Beheaded journalist's family says U.S. no help
■ Related: James Foley's parents had hoped to negotiate with captors before beheading
Ransom payments are prohibited under U.S. law, on the theory they would encourage terrorist groups to kidnap more Americans.
McDonough said he sympathized with the Foley and Sotloff families, and noted that the administration attempted a hostage rescue in Syria.
“We took every effort and will continue to take every effort to secure people,” he said.
In discussing the counter-terrorism plan, McDonough urged Congress to fund anti-IS fighters in Syria, and said the U.S. is “obviously” at war with the militant group.
The interviews aired a day after the Islamic State beheaded a third hostage, British aid worker David Haines
The plan that President Barack Obama announced Wednesday includes the prospect of U.S. airstrikes in Syria, while expanding ongoing strikes in neighboring Iraq.
Obama, McDonough, and other aides say the plan features assistance to local forces in Iraq and Syria to carry the fight against the Islamic State, also known as ISIL or ISIS.
In his round of interviews, McDonough echoed Obama’s pledge to avoid using U.S. combat troops.
“It’s going to be Iraqi and other boots on the ground that are bringing this fight to ISIL,” McDonough said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
On ABC’s “This Week,” McDonough said that “what we want to make sure happens is that we have committed partners who can take the fight to ISIL on the ground. And they will have not only support from us from the air, but they’ll also have training and equipment support from us.”
Lawmakers and analysts have questioned Obama’s plan, saying that the United States will have to get more involved -- including the prospect of ground troops -- if the Islamic State is to be defeated.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told “Fox News Sunday” that the Obama administration is “delusional” about its plan.
“It is our fight,” Graham said. “It’s not just their fight. This is a radical Islamic army that’s pushing a theory of a master religion” and threatens people worldwide.
Administration officials have offered different descriptions of the administrations’s plan, ranging from “counter-terrorism operations” to outright “war.”
On NBC’s “Meet The Press,” McDonough said that “as much as we’ve been at war with al Qaeda since we got here, we’re at war with ISIL.”
It is “a complicated effort,” McDonough said, and “success looks like an ISIL that no longer threatens our friends in the region, no longer threatens the United States -- an ISIL that can’t accumulate followers, or threaten Muslims in Syria, Iran, Iraq, or otherwise.”
Secretary of State John Kerry, who has disputed the use of the term “war,” told CBS’ “Face The Nation” that “there’s frankly a kind of tortured debate going on about terminology ... What I’m focused on, obviously, is getting done what we need to get done to ISIL.”
McDonough hit a series of Sunday interview shows to promote the administration’s counter-terrorism plan against the Islamic State, including a plea to Congress to fund anti-IS forces in Syria.
The families of James Foley and Steven Sotloff -- American journalists beheaded by the Islamic State -- said the government objected when they considered ransom payments, and even threatened prosecution.
“We didn’t threaten anybody, but we made clear what the law is,” McDonough said on “Fox News Sunday.” “That’s our responsibility to make sure we explain the law and uphold the law.”
■ Related: Beheaded journalist's family says U.S. no help
■ Related: James Foley's parents had hoped to negotiate with captors before beheading
Ransom payments are prohibited under U.S. law, on the theory they would encourage terrorist groups to kidnap more Americans.
McDonough said he sympathized with the Foley and Sotloff families, and noted that the administration attempted a hostage rescue in Syria.
“We took every effort and will continue to take every effort to secure people,” he said.
In discussing the counter-terrorism plan, McDonough urged Congress to fund anti-IS fighters in Syria, and said the U.S. is “obviously” at war with the militant group.
The interviews aired a day after the Islamic State beheaded a third hostage, British aid worker David Haines
The plan that President Barack Obama announced Wednesday includes the prospect of U.S. airstrikes in Syria, while expanding ongoing strikes in neighboring Iraq.
Obama, McDonough, and other aides say the plan features assistance to local forces in Iraq and Syria to carry the fight against the Islamic State, also known as ISIL or ISIS.
In his round of interviews, McDonough echoed Obama’s pledge to avoid using U.S. combat troops.
“It’s going to be Iraqi and other boots on the ground that are bringing this fight to ISIL,” McDonough said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
On ABC’s “This Week,” McDonough said that “what we want to make sure happens is that we have committed partners who can take the fight to ISIL on the ground. And they will have not only support from us from the air, but they’ll also have training and equipment support from us.”
Lawmakers and analysts have questioned Obama’s plan, saying that the United States will have to get more involved -- including the prospect of ground troops -- if the Islamic State is to be defeated.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told “Fox News Sunday” that the Obama administration is “delusional” about its plan.
“It is our fight,” Graham said. “It’s not just their fight. This is a radical Islamic army that’s pushing a theory of a master religion” and threatens people worldwide.
Administration officials have offered different descriptions of the administrations’s plan, ranging from “counter-terrorism operations” to outright “war.”
On NBC’s “Meet The Press,” McDonough said that “as much as we’ve been at war with al Qaeda since we got here, we’re at war with ISIL.”
It is “a complicated effort,” McDonough said, and “success looks like an ISIL that no longer threatens our friends in the region, no longer threatens the United States -- an ISIL that can’t accumulate followers, or threaten Muslims in Syria, Iran, Iraq, or otherwise.”
Secretary of State John Kerry, who has disputed the use of the term “war,” told CBS’ “Face The Nation” that “there’s frankly a kind of tortured debate going on about terminology ... What I’m focused on, obviously, is getting done what we need to get done to ISIL.”
No comments:
Post a Comment