BENGHAZI BOMBSHELL! Ex Military and CIA Committee: Obama and Hillary Did It
by Voice of Reason
Just when you think the “Professional Politicians” cannot sink any lower, they go WAY lower. I remember thinking they MAY have hit ROCK BOTTOM when they were caught STAGING DEAD SOLDIERS COMING BACK FROM WAR and making a bid deal about it.
They don’t make a big deal about REAL dead soldiers, certainly not ones THEY are responsible for killing, so I thought that was the LOW point.
The Obama administration continues to stoop lower. If the American people elect this murdering bitch it might be TIME TO EXPATRIATE. Period.
A citizen’s committee made up of former high military brass,
CIA and intelligence agents and think tank members have finished their
report on Benghazi. Their conclusion is Obama’s policies made the
Benghazi attack by Al Qaeda possible by switching sides in the war on
terror. The committee spent 7 months investigating the Benghazi attack
and it’s causes. Their conclusion was that Obama allowed weapons to
enter Libya and into Al Qaeda’s hands. Without those weapons, the
attack in Benghazi would not be possible.
One former CIA agent, Clare Lopez was quoted as saying:
“The United States switched sides in
the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the
provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures.”
She blamed the Obama administration for allowing $500 million
dollars worth of weapons to enter the country and into Al Qaeda’s hands:
“Remember, these weapons that came
into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were
blockading the approaches from air and sea. They were permitted to come
in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..”
“The intelligence community was part
of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that
means that the top leadership of the United States, our national
security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on
this – also knew about this.”
The weapons were supposed to be for Gaddafi, but were allowed to flow to the Islamists fighting him.
Here is an excerpt from their report:
“The White House and senior
Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released
Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided
material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler
[Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to
suppress al-Qaeda.”
Another commission member, Retired Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic, said those
weapons are now in Syria as Al Qaeda is trying to expand it’s sphere of
influence throughout the Middle East.
“Gaddafi wasn’t a good guy, but he
was being marginalized. “Gaddafi actually offered to abdicate’ shortly
after the beginning of a 2011 rebellion.”
“But the U.S. ignored his calls for a truce.”
Kubic said that the effort at truce talks fell apart when the White House declined to let the Pentagon pursue it seriously.
“We had a leader who had won the Nobel Peace Prize, but who was unwilling to give peace a chance for 72 hours.”
Gaddafi only asked for two conditions in return for stepping down.
First, he wanted to be able to continue fighting against Al Qaeda and
having the sanctions lifted against himself, his family and his
supporters. Very modest requests but ones that were rejected outright
by Obama and his henchpersons.
The White House and the National Security staff have not commented on the report.
Admiral James Lyons believes that the Benghazi attack was a kidnap plan
gone wrong and that the Islamic extremists planned to trade Christopher
Stevens for Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman. Abdel-Rahman was the mastermind
of the first World Trade Center bombing. Lyons also accused the Obama
administration of lying when they said they did not have any assets
ready to relieve Benghazi:
“I’‘m going to tell you that’s not true. We had a 130-man unit of forces at Sigonella [AFB in Italy]. They were ready to go.”
“The flight time from Sigonella to Benghazi is roughly an hour.”
The committee requested 87 documents from the government, but relied on
their contacts within the intelligence community for much of their
information.
Former CIA officer Wayne Simmons was harshly critical of Hillary and her actions before, during and after the Benghazi attack:
“They believed they were going to be saved, that they were going to be rescued, but they weren’t.”
“I know who made the decision, in my
heart of hearts, to leave our war fighters there and be blown up. And
then to have one of the most powerful politicians in our country sit
there and say, “What difference does it make?” – should be an alarm bell
for all Americans.
“It haunts me. I play that line over, and over, and over, and over in my mind.’
Lopez suggested that the fact that John Boehner blocked appointing a
select committee may mean high ranking congressional leaders had been
briefed on the WH plans.
No comments:
Post a Comment