Op-Ed: The President’s True Colors Finally Revealed
Steven Emerson's Opinion on JerusalemOnline's Report
Aug 17, 2014, 08:45PM | Steven Emerson
President Obama Reuters/Channel 2 News
When I first glanced at the headline on today’s Jerusalem Online and
reports in the Jerusalem Post and other Israeli newspapers, I thought
they must have been a satire: “Washington officials have told Egypt that
the US will grantee Israel's commitment to any agreement signed.” But
it was not a satire. The was deadly serious, confirmed by other Israeli
newspapers and sources in Cairo.
The US offering to Hamas to “guarantee”
Israeli commitments to any agreement signed? As if anyone needed proof
of the Obama Administration’s antipathy to Israel, here it was in black
and white. If anyone party needed a commitment to enforce its agreements
in any deal, it would have been Hamas, that has been known to break
every commitment it ever made. To pick just a few at random:
Israel on the other hand meticulously fulfilled its part of the bargain by severely relaxing the blockade on Gaza, allowing tons of previously restricted cement and steel into Gaza, increasing the number of daily truckloads of food, medical stuff and building equipment through the two Israeli checkpoints into Gaza by more than 250 truckloads a day ( a commitment is still upheld during the Hamas war against Israel, a fact mostly ignored by the mainstream media blindly committed to the Hamas narrative that Israel was the aggressor).
Remember when Obama spoke to the annual AIPAC conference a few years back and ceremoniously declared, “I got your back.” This is the same President who, as the Wall Street Journal disclosed last week, personally held up the Israeli request for additional Hellfire missiles that it had depleted in its war with Hamas.
As far back as 1967, the United States had made a firm promise to Israel that it would never allow the Egyptians to blockade the Straits of Hormuz, considered the lifeline of Israel. But when the Egyptians blockaded the Straights of Hormuz in May 1967, what did the US do? Nothing.
And in the current round of negotiations being held in Cairo now, according to leaked details in Egyptian newspapers reported by today’s Jerusalem Online
Israel agreed to make the following astonishing concessions:
And what did the Hamas commit to?
In light of the fact that Hamas has manifestly never upheld any of the commitments it has ever made, the salient question that has to be asked is why Obama did feel compelled to assuage Hamas with an assurance that the US would “guarantee” that Israeli upheld its commitments? The word “guarantee” has a rather expansive and vague latitude for definition. The most recent demonstration of an American guarantee that Israel would halt its defensive war against Hamas was the suspension of critical military deliveries to Israel during the height of the conflagration instigated by Hamas.
Indeed, for all the public affirmations made last week—after the WSJ expose-- by the Obama Administration that the US was “totally committed to the security of Israel,” Obama suddenly decides to make a promise to Hamas—whose covenant differs not one bit from the fascist radical Islamic doctrine adopted by ISIL—that it would enforce the commitments made by Israel, which in fact have historically been studiously upheld by Israel.
If Obama was truly sincere in his now obviously contrived promises to “watch [Israel’s] back”, he would have offered to guarantee Hamas commitments, a terrorist group that has repeatedly violated its commitments in previous agreements. But with his statement that he would “guarantee” Israeli commitments and not those made by Hamas, the President has revealed his true colors for everyone to see.
Steven Emerson is Executive Director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism (www.investigativeproject.org), a non profit group that investigates the threat of radical Islam, author of 6 book on terrorism and national security and executive producer of the award winning 2013 documentary “Jihad in America: The Grand Deception” (www.granddeception.com)
-
Hamas recently violated 9 cease fire agreements, including two of its own
-
Hamas illegally siphoned thousands of tons of cement and steel
shipments it received from international donors and Israel that it had
committed to use the build the civilian infrastructure in Gaza for
hospitals, schools and apartment buildings; instead it spent upwards of
$500 million of these humanitarian shipments to covertly build numerous
tunnels buried deep underground into Israel in order to carry out
murderous raids on Israeli civilian communities intended to kill tens of
thousands of Israelis
-
Hamas violated the 2012 Cease Fire negotiated by then State
Department Secretary Hillary Clinton together with then Egyptian Muslim
President Mohammed Morsi in which Hamas committed to stop smuggling
weapons and missiles into Israel, of which nearly 4000 were recently
launched into 80% of Israel’s population centers
-
Hamas violated the commitment to the Palestinian Authority that it
would never launch a coup d’état against the PA after Israel withdrew
from Gaza in 2005. But in 2007, Hamas did exactly that in a bloody
takeover of Gaza, kicking out and killing PA officials.
-
Hamas violated a publicly solemn commitment to its own civilians
that it would uphold the rule of law (yea, right) when it took over
Gaza only to subsequently execute hundreds of dissident Gazans, torture
and imprison thousands of political opponents, violently persecute the
minority of Christians still living in Gaza and imprison and prosecute
suspected gay Gazans.
-
Violating a commitment it made in the Clinton negotiated 2012 truce that it would cease its missile attacks on Israel.
Israel on the other hand meticulously fulfilled its part of the bargain by severely relaxing the blockade on Gaza, allowing tons of previously restricted cement and steel into Gaza, increasing the number of daily truckloads of food, medical stuff and building equipment through the two Israeli checkpoints into Gaza by more than 250 truckloads a day ( a commitment is still upheld during the Hamas war against Israel, a fact mostly ignored by the mainstream media blindly committed to the Hamas narrative that Israel was the aggressor).
Remember when Obama spoke to the annual AIPAC conference a few years back and ceremoniously declared, “I got your back.” This is the same President who, as the Wall Street Journal disclosed last week, personally held up the Israeli request for additional Hellfire missiles that it had depleted in its war with Hamas.
As far back as 1967, the United States had made a firm promise to Israel that it would never allow the Egyptians to blockade the Straits of Hormuz, considered the lifeline of Israel. But when the Egyptians blockaded the Straights of Hormuz in May 1967, what did the US do? Nothing.
And in the current round of negotiations being held in Cairo now, according to leaked details in Egyptian newspapers reported by today’s Jerusalem Online
Israel agreed to make the following astonishing concessions:
-
“Israel will stop its attacks in Gaza - in land, sea and air. No ground operations will be conducted.”
-
Israel has agreed to the “opening of crossings between Israel and
Gaza [in which] Movement of people and merchandise will be allowed, to
rebuild Gaza.”
-
“ Eliminating the buffer zone in the North and East of Gaza and
deployment of Palestinian military forces starting from January 1, 2015”
-
“Freedom of fishing and action in the territorial waters of the
Palestinians in Gaza to a range of 6 miles. The range will gradually be
increased, to no less than 12 miles…”
-
“Israeli authorities will assist the Palestinian Authority to restore
the foundations in Gaza, as well as help provide the necessary living
needs for those who were forced to leave their homes due to the battles.
Also, Israel will provide emergency medical attention to the wounded
and will supply humanitarian assistance and food to Gaza as soon as
possible.”
And what did the Hamas commit to?
-
“All Palestinian factions in Gaza will stop the attacks against
Israel, in the land, the sea and the air; also, building tunnels from
Gaza to Israeli territory will be stopped.”
In light of the fact that Hamas has manifestly never upheld any of the commitments it has ever made, the salient question that has to be asked is why Obama did feel compelled to assuage Hamas with an assurance that the US would “guarantee” that Israeli upheld its commitments? The word “guarantee” has a rather expansive and vague latitude for definition. The most recent demonstration of an American guarantee that Israel would halt its defensive war against Hamas was the suspension of critical military deliveries to Israel during the height of the conflagration instigated by Hamas.
Indeed, for all the public affirmations made last week—after the WSJ expose-- by the Obama Administration that the US was “totally committed to the security of Israel,” Obama suddenly decides to make a promise to Hamas—whose covenant differs not one bit from the fascist radical Islamic doctrine adopted by ISIL—that it would enforce the commitments made by Israel, which in fact have historically been studiously upheld by Israel.
If Obama was truly sincere in his now obviously contrived promises to “watch [Israel’s] back”, he would have offered to guarantee Hamas commitments, a terrorist group that has repeatedly violated its commitments in previous agreements. But with his statement that he would “guarantee” Israeli commitments and not those made by Hamas, the President has revealed his true colors for everyone to see.
Steven Emerson is Executive Director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism (www.investigativeproject.org), a non profit group that investigates the threat of radical Islam, author of 6 book on terrorism and national security and executive producer of the award winning 2013 documentary “Jihad in America: The Grand Deception” (www.granddeception.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment