Sec of State John Kerry reveals daughter married Iranian-American with extensive ties to Iran
Posted on March 30, 2013 by creeping
via Secretary of State John Kerry demonstrates why Huma Abedin’s background mattered | Walid Shoebat.
Here we have an example that demonstrates
this reality further and it comes via Kenneth Timmerman, who has picked
up on the fact that the new Secretary of State – John Kerry – has a
son-in-law with family still living in Iran. This reality could
conceivably affect how Kerry deals with the Iranians.
Via the Daily Caller:
In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran.
“I am proud of the Iranian-Americans in my own family, and grateful for how they have enriched my life,” Kerry said in the official statement. Kerry also said he was “strongly committed to resolving” the differences between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran, “to the mutual benefit of both of our people.”
Politicians like to keep their families off-limits to the press, a decorum enforced vigorously when it comes to politicians who are in favor with the national media but ruthlessly discarded for others. But in Kerry’s case, there could be larger ramifications.
Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.
There it is. Certainly, even leftists can
comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought
processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of
Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands
that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws
living in Iran.
In the current political construct, such
demands could conceivably involve the U.S. withholding money, weapons,
or aid earmarked for a country like Egypt as tensions in the Middle East
escalate. While that may not sound like a bad idea to those of us who
understand the threat of the Muslim Brotherhood, shouldn’t our Secretary
of State’s sole interest be in lockstep with the interests of the
United States?
Off topic but related: Strange bedfellows — Iran and al Qaeda
No comments:
Post a Comment