Pentagon Official: Why Obama Made The Taliban Trade
9:45 PM 06/02/2014
Here is the truth: The deal to trade five senior Taliban detainees
to secure the release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was political. It was
publicly justified with lies, it breaks decades of U.S. policy, it
breaks American law, it puts Americans at risk, it undermines the
government of Afghanistan, and it passes responsibility on to the next
administration.
But first of all, it was political.
But no, it was not to take the spot light off of the failures at the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Simply stated, it was because so long as Bergdahl remained in Taliban
captivity in Pakistan, the Obama administration would never be able to
close the chapter of the failed Afghanistan campaign it has owned since
approving — and then under-resourcing — a surge of U.S. forces in the
country.
(Pentagon Official: Obama Conducting Foreign Policy Based On Polling — Not US Safety)
Bergdahl’s captivity served as a constant reminder of President
Barack Obama’s strategic failures while U.S. forces prepare to withdraw
from Afghanistan. That’s something the Democrats cannot allow going into
2014 and 2016 elections. So the president agreed to an unprecedented
deal in blatant violation of U.S. law and established precedent that
undermines the safety and security of the United States and her
citizens,
once again choosing short-term political gain over long-term security interests.
(Pentagon Official: Obama’s Afghanistan Fantasy Today Is America’s Nightmare Tomorrow)
Claims of new information on Bergdahl’s deteriorating health are
simply false justifications. Bergdahl’s health was in no worse shape
than should be reasonably expected of someone who had been a prisoner
for five years. He walked without assistance into the waiting company of
U.S. special operations forces, and then climbed aboard the waiting
helicopter. He was mentally sound enough to recognize what was going on
around him and to communicate with American forces. And none of the
medical or psychological issues that he has displayed symptoms are life
threatening. So this was just another example of the administration
trying to justify its actions.
Additionally, the decision breaks with a decades-old standing U.S.
policy to never negotiate with terrorists. Bergdahl was being held by
the Haqqani Network in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of
Pakistan. The Obama administration designated the Haqqani Network a
terrorist organization just a few years ago. By negotiating with the
Haqqani Network through the government of Qatar, the administration
violated the policy.
(Pentagon Official: Obama’s #ForeignPolicy? #AskMichelle)
Though this is not how the Obama administration sees it.
When CNN’s Candy Crowley asked National Security Advisor Susan Rice if
the U.S. had negotiated with terrorists, Rice once again proved she
shouldn’t be allowed on Sunday shows when she said no, because the
United States had negotiated the deal through Qatar. But a child can
understand that the Qataris passing our messages to the Taliban — and
vice versa — makes the Qataris no different than a telephone or email
service. We were negotiating with the Haqqanis no matter how you try to
spin it.
And when asked why the administration failed to notify Congress about
the Guantanamo Bay prison transfer despite U.S. law requiring the
administration to notify Congress 30 days in advance of any transfer of
prisoners from the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, she said
it was because they were worried it would jeopardize the deal.
So Rice and the administration were afraid that congressmen
exercising their oversight might object to the release of five
battle-hardened terrorists and suspected war criminals, or that the deal
could leak. So instead, the administration chose to willfully violate
U.S. law by not informing Congress.
And as for fears of a leak, the administration informed members of
Congress about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden before it took place
— something far more sensitive in terms of intelligence resources. Rice
did, however, let us know that the administration had seen fit to
consult with the Department of Justice about the deal.
The five detainees released were among the most senior members of the
former Taliban government to be captured by the United States. They
include the former Taliban minister of the interior, Taliban deputy
minister of defense, Taliban deputy minister of intelligence, a senior
Taliban military commander, and the Taliban governor of Herat Province.
Several of these men are accused of committing serious war crimes,
including genocide. All of these men have Afghan and American blood on
their hands.
Although the five Taliban commanders had been declared high risk,
some have argued that they are too old and have been in prison for too
long to make a successful return to the battlefield. Many detainees
released from Guantanamo Bay have done just that, though. Surprise.
As part of the deal, these five men must remain in Qatar for one year
before they are permitted to return to Afghanistan. And in doing so,
the administration is once again kicking the can down the road.
In one year, the U.S. will have withdrawn all combat forces from
Afghanistan — according to the president’s plan. These men will now
become the Afghan government’s problem, and we can add them to the
growing list of issues, including Iran, North Korea and Syria that this
president is passing the buck on.
Finally, the
administration failed to consult the government of Afghanistan before
agreeing to this deal. In doing so, the Obama administration robbed
Afghan President Karzai and his successor of potentially valuable
bargaining chips in a larger reconciliation effort.
This deal
essentially took chess pieces off of the board for the Afghans at a time
when they were needed most, and has left the Afghan government in a
position where it looks weak, incompetent and untrustworthy to its ally.
That is not a good signal to send to the nation or the world just
before the U.S. withdraws its combat forces and begins the final
transition of responsibility to the Afghanistan and they’re security
forces.
But all that is secondary in the Obama White House, where optics rule.
And the show must go on.
Joseph Miller is the pen name for a senior Department of
Defense official with a background is in U.S. special operations and
combat experience in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has worked in strategic
planning.
No comments:
Post a Comment