Dragged the U.S. ambassador in Benghazi
Since the advent of prolonged article for The New York Times, U.S., on
28 December last year, and who tried to cross seven thousand, the word
whitewash the Obama administration, along with Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton,
Which was known scandal attack Benghazi, which led to the killing of the American ambassador in Libya and four others, violent controversy within the corridors of American politics, about the credibility of the newspaper, and its intention clear to an extensive campaign, trying to be distancing the U.S. administration for charge conversion Libya and specifically Benghazi to the axis to spread terrorism and arms smuggling in the region, and also the support of terrorist groups in Syria, in order to cool the blood that sacrificed their men in Benghazi. The Washington Times, has published an opinion piece on the front page a few days ago, criticizing the sharp contrast that occurred when the New York Times, one of the most prominent American newspapers, when published through its correspondent David Kirkpatrick, director of the newspaper's office in Cairo, the Al-Qaeda did not participate in the attack of Benghazi, and that the U.S. administration were not aware of it, and he came spontaneously, as a result of anger by radical Islamists about the film anti-Islam, who has been traded on the site YouTube, in September 2011, and which was produced in the United States.
Kirk Patrick, responsible for the deployment of tens of Altaqariralamlona for Egypt, in recent times, since the fall of Mercy, try that also shows through his article detailed, that al-Qaeda was not involved in the attack, which came contrary to newspaper reports earlier, which had been published dozens of reports which confirm the involvement of al-Qaeda groups in the attack, and that the Central Intelligence Agency and the Secretary of State, and at the time was aware of them. Pete Hoekstra, former chairman of the Intelligence Committee, U.S. House of Representatives, criticized in an article in the magazine National Review, the failure of the Obama administration foreign, and how she lost old friends in the Middle East, to put her hand in the hand of other friends, they are terrorist groups affiliated with al-Qaeda, and how they dropped the Gaddafi regime, the transformation of Libya to the state-run terrorist militias.
The MP American, Terry Gaudi has accused Clinton and the Obama administration on 2 August last year, disinformation deliberate attack, and the relocation of witnesses to places unknown which is also expressed by Senator Rand Paul, who said he had not been inferred witnesses wanted to testify before committees of the Council of Senate and House of Representatives on the attack, accusing particularly Hillary involvement in this blackout, during the presentation of her testimony before the Foreign Relations Committee of the Council Sheikh on 23 January, was confirmed by Paul that he has the benefit of involvement in smuggling weapons to Syria from Libya via Turkey, also spoke about the deliberate The CIA destroyed the scene and obliterate the evidence, so as not to enable the Committee to examine impartially.
Among the accusations against the U.S. administration, which has provided around Hillary Clinton, her testimony before a congressional committee, that the U.S. administration was aware the time of the attack, and who are the attackers, and that the plan was to kidnap the ambassador and a number of hostages in order to pressure the White House to release the blind sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, who is currently in prison in the United States of responsibility for the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 and, according to some press reports, and analyst American Raymond Ibrahim and others, many of the question marks have been hovering around the silence of U.S. President Barack Obama for the attack, and confirmed some of the analysis that it was aimed at pressuring Congress for the release of Sheikh, where Hillary has promised Mohamed Morsi, upon his arrival to power to release him, but Obama found a negative reaction strong from the American people, to make it back down on this promise, particularly as it was in the midst of the final weeks of his campaign for the state of again.
This explains according to some observers, the deliberate delay by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to send reinforcements to the consulate, while the U.S. military ships in the Mediterranean Sea, just 20 minutes from the scene of the attack. Then there is what she calls some American newspapers, the mystery of Washington's dirty little in Libya, which is your biggest scandal to smuggle weapons from Libya to Syria, to support terrorist groups, deployed in Syria, in order to accelerate the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad.
As wrote political analyst Katie Kieffer of the Institute for Democracy security, the Hillary and director of the Central Intelligence Agency at the time, David Petraeus, were behind what might be called a Benghazi Contra, modeled on the Iran-Contra scandal, according to this scenario, he had been appointed Stevens to deal with the logistics of the process secret, in March 2011, has seen military experts, former U.S. before a committee of Congress, said Stevens was the man responsible for the development of final plans to isolate Muammar Gaddafi, and that after the implementation of the job transfer to Benghazi, where he began to amass an arsenal of weapons of advanced Russian-made, which was owned by Gaddafi, for shipment to jihadist groups in Syria, and that in the September 2, 2012 met with Petraeus, Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to agree to be his channel to reach the jihadists in Syria, and in Benghazi completed Stevens final arrangements with the Turkish consul there on Cit Akin.
No comments:
Post a Comment