What has Hillary “Benghazi” Clinton Ever Done Right ?

Filed in Abusive Women, Are women mentally sane?, Arrogant Females, Biased Bigot Hillary Clinton, Corrupt females, Corrupt Leaders and Politicians, Corrupt Women, Delusional Women, Democrat Bias and Corruption, Emily's List, Feminism is a dirty word, Feminism is a HATE movement, Feminist Bigots, Feminist hegemony, Feminist hypocrites, Feminist liars, Left Wing Lunacy, Lefts Religious Hatred, Liars Cheats and Thieves, Male Hating Feminists, Political Corruption, Racists and Bigots, Radical feminism, Toxic Feminism, Toxic Feminists, Toxic Women, Women in Power on August 22, 2013 with no comments

• Stumble This
• Digg This
• Share on Delicious
• Share on Facebook
• Tweet This
• Tags: Benghazi, Biased Bigot Hillary Clinton, Bigoted Hillary Clinton, Communism, democrats, featured, female bigots, feminist hate machine, Feminist Hillary Clinton, Hillary "Benghazi" Clinton, hillary clinton, It Takes a Village, Paglia, Slate, socialism

Hillary Clinton, bigoted, biased feminist.

I did an article on this some time back, posing that same question and it’s interesting how that same question is now being asked.

So What Has Hillary “Rodham” Clinton Ever Done that Deserved an AWARD?

There are quite a few issues about Clinton that is completely bizarre and one would have to question it’s sanity and policies she may introduce and follow through on. Feminist Clinton wrote a book about the Village raising the kids which she wants enacted, she wants to take away your children. That action is straight out of the communist agenda, getting to the kids is the way to educate and train people aboout socialism as well as communism. That is one of their greatest aims and goals. Why else would Hillary “Benghazi” Clinton make those recommendations if it were not part of her future strategy and goals.
Another author wrote a similar headline and this time it’s from that leftist/feminist Paglia, and that feminist promoting site, Slate.

PAGLIA: WHAT HAS HILLARY DONE?

Clinton is an absolute pathetic excuse for a politician. She has no noticeable track record of achievements, except for a list of major cock-ups. As a representative of biased Bill to fix some medical policy way back when, which she screwed up and got nowhere. Next she was appointed by feminised Obama as Secretary of State, solely because the habit of appointing useless incompetent females was the current precedence and feminist Obama was all for appointing another female.
Clinton is solely responsible for the massacre in Benghazi as she has already confessed, allowing four Americans to be murdered because of her moronic political mentality could justify doing nothing. Even now she acts like it has no importance or relevance. Four people dying because she was too incompetent to act is – she said, “What difference does it make what we knew and when we knew it”.
Hillary “Feminist Bigot” Clinton.
What type of leader is that bigoted feminist going to be and what is Hillary going to do when she holds the highest position in the land. If Julia Gillard is any example of what a biased, male-hating, “woman are victims” politician and leader is anything to go by, it will ten times worse as that incompetent Clinton has already shown her mettle, of which none exists. A vote for Clinton is a worse vote than for Obama, both do not give a damn about any male issues as they have already clearly demonstrated and if you always vote in that direction, it is time you had a good think about what advantage a vote for a feminist is ever going to help anyone at all.
Even Slate and Paglia has to raise some reality about this feminist bigot.
Any hopes, fears or predictions for the presidential elections in 2016?

As a registered Democrat, I am praying for a credible presidential candidate to emerge from the younger tier of politicians in their late 40s. A governor with executive experience would be ideal. It’s time to put my baby-boom generation out to pasture! We’ve had our day and managed to muck up a hell of a lot. It remains baffling how anyone would think that Hillary Clinton (born the same year as me) is our party’s best chance. She has more sooty baggage than a 90-car freight train. And what exactly has she ever accomplished — beyond bullishly covering for her philandering husband? She’s certainly busy, busy and ever on the move — with the tunnel-vision workaholism of someone trying to blot out uncomfortable private thoughts.
I for one think it was a very big deal that our ambassador was murdered in Benghazi. In saying “I take responsibility” for it as secretary of state, Hillary should have resigned immediately. The weak response by the Obama administration to that tragedy has given a huge opening to Republicans in the next presidential election. The impression has been amply given that Benghazi was treated as a public relations matter to massage rather than as the major and outrageous attack on the U.S. that it was.
Throughout history, ambassadors have always been symbolic incarnations of the sovereignty of their nations and the dignity of their leaders. It’s even a key motif in “King Lear.” As far as I’m concerned, Hillary disqualified herself for the presidency in that fist-pounding moment at a congressional hearing when she said, “What difference does it make what we knew and when we knew it, Senator?” Democrats have got to shake off the Clinton albatross and find new blood. The escalating instability not just in Egypt but throughout the Mideast is very ominous. There is a clash of cultures brewing in the world that may take a century or more to resolve — and there is no guarantee that the secular West will win.
What do you make of contemporary feminism, especially as it’s manifested online?

Oh, feminism is still alive? Thanks for the tip! It sure is invisible, except for the random whine from some maleducated product of the elite schools who’s found a plush berth in glossy magazines. It’s hard to remember those bad old days when paleofeminist pashas ruled the roost. In the late ‘80s, the media would routinely turn to Gloria Steinem or the head of NOW for “the women’s view” on every issue — when of course it was just the Manhattan/D.C. insider’s take, with a Democratic activist spin. Their shameless partisanship eventually doomed those Stalinist feminists, who were trampled by the pro-sex feminist stampede of the early ‘90s (in which I am proud to have played a vocal role). That insurgency began in San Francisco in the mid-‘80s and went national throughout the following decade. They keep dusting Steinem off and trotting her out to pin awards on her, but she’s the walking dead. Her anointed heirs (like Susan Faludi) sure didn’t pan out, did they?