Thursday, September 12, 2013

North Korea Appears to Restart Plutonium Reactor

North Korea Appears to Restart Plutonium Reactor

Wong Maye-E/Associated Press
North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, recently declared that the country’s nuclear program was not a bargaining chip.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Save
  • E-mail
  • Share
  • Print
  • Reprints
WASHINGTON — New satellite photographs showing steam emerging from a newly reconstructed nuclear reactor in North Korea suggest that the country may be making good on its promise to resume the production of plutonium for its small nuclear arsenal, six years after it reached an agreement with the Bush administration to dismantle the facility.
Multimedia
World Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.
The discovery of the activity at the Yongbyon complex, the centerpiece of North Korea’s nuclear program, was reported by the U.S.-Korea Institute, at Johns Hopkins University, which follows the North’s nuclear program closely.
If the source of the steam proves to be the restarting of the reactor, it would enable the North, after a year or more, to begin to add to its arsenal of plutonium weapons. It would also underscore the failure of efforts by four American presidents to stop the North Korean program; so far, the North has conducted three nuclear tests, including two during the Obama administration.
The possible restart of the reactor comes just months after one of the worst crises in years on the divided peninsula, as the North conducted a third nuclear test, then lashed out with threats of nuclear attacks after additional international sanctions were imposed.
In recent weeks the North Koreans have appeared more conciliatory, including expressing a willingness to return to negotiations with the United States, China, Russia, South Korea and Japan, though they have not clarified if they would be willing to agree to the ultimate goal of nuclear disarmament. The United States and its allies, however, have stood firm, saying they would resume the talks on the nuclear program only if the North agreed to eventually give up its arsenal.
Analysts said the re-emergence of steam at the plant — whether real or a contrivance — could well be designed by the North to try to force the United States and its allies into the talks in the hopes of winning economic aid by creating the fear that North Korea is preparing to add to its weapons stockpile.
But the move could have the opposite effect. President Obama has been deeply reluctant to take steps that would reward North Korea for halting activities it had already agreed to stop. His former secretary of defense, Robert M. Gates, once famously said that the United States was “tired of buying the same horse twice.” So far there have been no new offers to the North Koreans, and with attention focused on Syria and the Arab Spring uprisings, the administration has been reluctant to spend much political capital on a country that seems unlikely to give up its arsenal.
David Albright, the president of the Institute for Science and International Security, a Washington research group that tracks the North Korean nuclear program, said he had also studied satellite images of the complex and concluded that the venting steam suggested that the reactor had indeed begun working again.
“It implies that the reactor is restarted, but that needs to be confirmed,” he said in an interview. “You want to get confirmation because you never know” with the North Koreans. “They can surprise you,” he added, “but I can’t think of any alternative explanations.”
Mr. Albright added that the reactor would have to operate for two or three years in order to make plutonium in its core. Additional time, he said, would then be needed for the spent fuel to cool and the plutonium to be separated out from highly radioactive byproducts, known as reprocessing.
In all, Mr. Albright said, it might take the North Koreans three to four years to complete the manufacturing process, at which point they would have enough added plutonium to make anywhere from two to five more nuclear weapons. American intelligence officials say the country already has enough plutonium for six to a dozen bombs.
A South Korean government intelligence official on Thursday said that the government needed more time to figure out if the reactor had been restarted. “After all, the country we’re trying to figure out is North Korea,” said the official who spoke on the condition of anonymity citing the policy of his office.
But he quickly added that both Washington and Seoul have increased monitoring of Yongbyon since North Korea declared during a time of heightened tensions this year that it would put all its nuclear facilities — including the mothballed reactor — to use in expanding its nuclear weapons stockpile.
North Korea also has a uranium enrichment program, but that started after the plutonium program and it is unclear whether the North has produced enough uranium for a weapon.
The original agreement to halt operations at the nuclear reactor was hailed at the time as a breakthrough, especially when the North showed the destruction of part of the plant on television in 2008.
In return, the State Department removed North Korea from its list of state sponsors of terrorism. But that agreement began to fall apart within a year after it was signed, when the North Koreans evicted inspectors and began to rebuild parts of the reactor complex that they had dismantled.
The latest news comes as North Korea has significantly toned down its warlike rhetoric, restoring military hot lines with the South cut off several months ago, and agreeing to restart a jointly run industrial complex shut amid the threats and counterthreats following this year’s nuclear test. It also agreed to restart a program of reuniting Korean families separated by the Korean War.
But analysts said such mixed signals were not unusual, with the country’s young leader, Kim Jong-un, following a pattern set by his father.
“North Korea’s latest ‘peace offensive’ is almost preordained,” said Lee Sung-yoon, a North Korea specialist at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, calling it part of North Korea’s timeworn tactic of raising tensions to remind its adversaries that it is a menace that needs placating, then pushing for economic and diplomatic concessions.
“Through its latest ‘conciliatory’ gestures, it seeks in the short term to bolster Kim Jong-un’s credentials as a ‘statesman,’ ” Mr. Lee said. “In the long term, Pyongyang seeks to advance its strategic interests of improving its ballistic missiles and nuclear arsenal.”
Lee Byong-chul, a senior fellow at the Institute for Peace and Cooperation in Seoul, said the attempts to negotiate might be driven by economic difficulties, some of them brought on by the international sanctions. “They are desperate for cash,” Mr. Lee said.
David E. Sanger reported from Washington, William J. Broad from New York, and Choe Sang-Hun from Kyoto, Japan.

Politics: Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC

Politics: Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC 

JUST PROVES TO ME THAT MUSLIMS ARE WEAK THEY ONLY KILL WOMEN AND CHILDREN THE WEAKESS OF SEXES

Published by: Robert Laurie on Wednesday September 11th, 2013

Robert Laurie
Gridlock in DC as bikers overwhelm the city...
UPDATE: Apparently a few of the pictures that, this morning, were being circulated as part of today's event were actually taken earlier. So, we've pulled those and replaced them with a few more that we know were taken today.  Currently, the most widely reported estimate is that just over 880,000 patriots roared through the streets of DC this afternoon.
Sure, there's always gridlock in D.C.  Today, though, it's because the entire city is clogged with bikers.  In fact, lines of motorcycles stretch out from the city, along the highways, and off to the horizons in virtually every direction.  The capitol is absolutely inundated with bikes.
Part memorial, part counter-protest, the ride is designed to remember the victims of 9/11, draw attention to our eroding constitutional rights, and peacefully overwhelm a planned "Million Muslim March."
Here are some pictures and video from both events.
First, the bikers - most of these are from the Twitter feeds of riders and spectators.
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC









































































































Wow.
That's a lot of bikes.
Then of course, there was this guy.  We're not sure if he was actually part of the event, though.  He may just have been riding to Coldwater Creek for a new pair of Mom Jeans.
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC















Finally, if you're wondering how the "Million Muslim March" turned out, well, it's not coming along so well.  According to a headline at the Huffington Post, the "'Million Muslim March' Shaping Up To Be More Like A Few Hundred People Walking Down The Street."  If the HuffPo is saying that, you know it's bad.
Here are a couple of pictures illustrating the "massive" turnout...
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC
Photos and video as 2 million bikers roll on Washington DC

























Ouch.
Looks like we can put one in the win column for the bikers.
Be sure to "like" Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You'll be glad you did.

Putin on Assad Face The Russian president’s lecture about peace in Syria is all hypocrisy and lies.

Putin on Assad Face

The Russian president’s lecture about peace in Syria is all hypocrisy and lies.

Russia's President Vladimir Putin holds a news conference at the end of a G8 summit at the Lough Erne golf resort in Enniskillen, Northern Ireland June 18, 2013.
Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a news conference at the end of a G8 summit, June 18, 2013.
Photo by Yves Herman/Reuters
Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, wants to teach us about peace. A U.S. strike on Syrian military facilities “would constitute an act of aggression,” he writes in today’s New York Times. It would “result in more innocent victims,” “further destabilize the Middle East,” and endanger “the entire system of international law and order.” Putin laments that “military intervention in internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States.” Citing Russia as a model, he concludes: “We must stop using the language of force and return to the path of civilized diplomatic and political settlement.”
How cute. A lecture on nonviolence from Syria’s chief arms supplier. Let’s check Putin’s pieties against the facts.
1. The chemical weapons attack. “No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria” on Aug. 21, Putin writes. “But there is every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces.” Putin supplies no evidence for this claim, and an investigative report published Tuesday by Human Rights Watch thoroughly refutes him:
Advertisement
“Our investigation finds that the August 21 attacks were likely chemical weapons attacks using a surface-to-surface rocket system of approximately 330mm in diameter—likely  Syrian-produced—and a Soviet-era 140mm surface-to-surface rocket system to deliver a nerve agent. … The evidence concerning the type of rockets and launchers used in these attacks strongly suggests that these are weapon systems known and documented to be only in the possession of, and used by, Syrian government armed forces. Human Rights Watch and arms experts monitoring the use of weaponry in Syria have not documented Syrian opposition forces to be in the possession of the 140mm and 330mm rockets used in the attack, or their associated launchers. …
The scale and coordinated nature of the two attacks; against opposition-held areas; the presence of government-controlled potential launching sites within range of the targets; the pattern of other recent alleged chemical weapon attacks against opposition-held areas using the same 330mm rocket delivery system; and the documented possession of the 140mm and 330mm rocket systems able to deliver chemical weapons in the government arsenal—all point towards Syrian government responsibility for the attacks. Human Rights Watch has investigated alternative claims that opposition forces themselves were responsible for the August 21 attacks, and has found such claims lacking in credibility and inconsistent with the evidence found at the scene.”
2. Russia’s role. “From the outset, Russia has advocated peaceful dialogue enabling Syrians to develop a compromise plan for their own future,” Putin asserts. “We are not protecting the Syrian government, but international law.”
Really? Here’s a brief review of what Russia has done for Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, “During 2008–12 Russia supplied 71 per cent of Syria’s imports of major weapons.” Human Rights First reports, “In January, 2012, Russia signed a $550 million contract to provide the Assad regime with attack jets capable of hitting civilian targets on the ground.” Then Russia tried “to send four repaired Mi-25 attack helicopters to Syria in June 2012.” Around that time, Human Rights Watch sent Syria’s Russian arms supplier a list of human rights abuses perpetrated by Assad using Russian weapons. HRW urged Russia to stop sending missiles, fighter jets, and ammunition to Syria, but nothing changed. The Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, a Russian think tank, reports that last year, Russia and its contractors supplied Assad’s surface-to-air missile systems, repaired “at least four Syrian Mi-25 helicopters,” and apparently upgraded Syrian tanks.
In May of this year, the Finnish Institute of International Affairs reported that Russia had provided Assad with “20 modernized Mi-25 combat helicopters,” belying Russia’s claims that its arms deliveries were unrelated to the civil war. In June, a HRW official noted:
“Russia has continued to send arms to al-Assad—and not only defensive weapons, as Moscow repeatedly claimed. A recently leaked document reported on by the Washington Post shows the Syrian government requesting 20,000 Kalashnikovs and 20,000,000 bullets as recently as March. And a Russian arms manufacturer just claimed that a contract has been signed to deliver at least 10 fighter jets.”
In July, the United Nations’ Independent International Commission of Inquiry for Syria reported a “shipment by the Russian Federation of S-300 missile batteries” to Assad. This week, the commission added that “pre-conflict arms deals between Moscow and Damascus continue to be honored.” Human Rights First notes that “Russian officials have said they will not halt arms sales to the Assad regime so long as such sales are not prohibited by the U.N. Security Council.” In a delightful Catch-22, HRF points out that Russia itself has blocked such attempts at prohibition within the council.


Putin on Assad Face

The Russian president’s lecture about peace in Syria is all hypocrisy and lies.

(Continued from Page 1)
3. The U.N. “We need to use the United Nations Security Council,” Putin writes. “Preserving law and order in today’s complex and turbulent world is one of the few ways to keep international relations from sliding into chaos.” That’s hilarious. Putin has done everything possible to prevent the council from containing the chaos in Syria. Here’s the U.S. account of Russia’s behavior, delivered by U.N. ambassador Samantha Power:
“Since 2011, Russia and China have vetoed three separate Security Council resolutions condemning the Syrian regime’s violence or promoting a political solution to the conflict. This year alone, Russia has blocked at least three statements expressing humanitarian concern and calling for humanitarian access to besieged cities in Syria. And in the past two months, Russia has blocked two resolutions condemning the generic use of chemical weapons and two press statements expressing concern about their use.”
If you don’t trust that account, read the Times: “From the start of the war two and a half years ago, Russia has been Syria’s strongest backer, using its veto repeatedly to block any meaningful action at the Security Council.” Or read the Finnish report:
Advertisement
“When the al-Assad regime resorted to the use of military force to suppress growing political unrest in the country, Moscow fiercely resisted initiatives by the Arab and Western countries to adopt the United Nations Security Council (unsc) resolutions condemning the government forces and suggesting the possibility of introducing non-military sanctions against Syria (including an arms embargo). Moscow vetoed the draft unsc resolutions three times …”
Or read the report from the Human Rights Watch monitor in Syria:
“We have tried again and again to convince Moscow to play a constructive role to resolve the Syrian crisis—to use its influence with al-Assad to stop the attacks on civilians; to work with the moderate parts of the opposition; to assist with aid delivery to thousands of displaced people in opposition-controlled areas; and to support international efforts to bring war criminals on both sides to justice. … Moscow consistently refused, for example, to support a U.N. Commission of Inquiry into the situation in Syria.”
That’s the reality of Russia’s conduct. In Moscow, a state-controlled TV network suggested last night that for brokering peace in Syria, Putin deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. I’d nominate him for a different prize: an Oscar.
William Saletan's latest short takes on the news, via Twitter:


Black Jihadist Flag Flies Over Christian Town of Maaloula

Black Jihadist Flag Flies Over Christian Town of Maaloula

 

 

Frontline: Dramatic report as Syria Army battles jihadists in ancient Ch...: http://youtu.be/Ln3UIefx0bM via @youtube 

  •   The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store
Syrian rebels murdered Catholics for refusing to convert to Islam, then joked about it
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
September 12, 2013
The black jihadist flag is flying over the Christian town of Maaloula in Syria as the Army’s battle with opposition militants continues to rage.
A dramatic report by RT’s Maria Finoshina illustrates that while there had been talk that the rebels had abandoned the ancient town, whose inhabitants still speak the language of Jesus, snipers still occupy high positions.
As the BBC’s Jeremy Bowen confirms, the opposition militants who first attacked the town when a suicide bomber killed himself at a nearby checkpoint are from the terrorist al-Nusra Front, which killed US troops in Iraq and swore allegiance to Al-Qaeda earlier this year. FSA militants are fighting alongside the al-Nusra insurgents.
“I’ve spoken to some local members of the National Defence Forces, a pro-government militia. They say they are fighting for their town and the fact it was a place where Christians and Muslims once lived side by side. They say they are fighting against the people they regard as terrorists,” writes Bowen, adding that residents claim rebels have desecrated Christian churches.
We previously documented two other instances where western-backed militants ransacked Christian churches in Syria.
Jabhat al-Nusra is under the control of Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri, who “personally intervened to settle a dispute between Jabhat al-Nusra and al-Qaeda in Iraq….and declared the Syrian group to be under his direction,” according to a report released this week by the Bipartisan Policy Center.
The fact that al-Nusra terrorists and Obama-backed FSA militants are fighting alongside each other again illustrates what many have pointed out is the lunacy of arming rebels and the impossibility of ensuring that such weapons are reserved for so-called “moderate” rebels. The Washington Post today reported that opposition fighters had begun receiving weapons courtesy of the CIA.
As academic Jonathan Spyer, who recently traveled through rebel territory in Syria, attests, “When one looks at the armed rebel groups, one finds an obvious vast majority there who are adherents of Islamism of one kind or another — stretching from Muslim Brotherhood-type formations all the way across to groups openly aligned with al-Qaida central and with al-Zawahiri.”
Christians in Maaloula fear that they will be targeted by extremist Muslims if the Syrian Army pulls out.
Residents who vacated the village soon after the conflict started wrote a letter to the United States Congress accusing the opposition militants of looting churches and forcing Christians to convert to Islam
The rebels looted “monasteries and churches, removing sacred images as they went on, ordering residents to abandon their religion, to convert to Islam to save their life,” states the letter.
Another woman claims her husband was murdered by the militants after he refused to convert to Islam. After the man was shot dead, the rebels apparently mocked his wife, remarking, “Jesus didn’t come to save him.”
Patriarch Grégoire III (Loutfi) Laham, who has already conducted funerals of three Catholics who were murdered by jihadists in Maaloula, told Vatican Radio, “Virtually all the Christian inhabitants fled from the village,” while rebels, “threatened some Christians with death unless they converted to Islam.”
“I saw people wearing Al-Nusra headbands who started shooting at crosses,” another resident told AFP . An Al-Nusra fighter “put a pistol to the head of my neighbor and forced him to convert to Islam by obliging him to repeat ‘there is no God but [Allah].’ Afterwards they joked, ‘He’s one of ours now.’”
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Thursday, September 12, 2013 at 10:40 am

North Korea Restarts Nuclear Production

North Korea Restarts Nuclear Production

 0
 0
 0
 

Print Article Send a Tip

On Thursday, as the Obama administration struggles to deal with breaking reports of another possible Syrian chemical attack in Damascus, The New York Times reports that satellite photos show steam coming from a newly retrofitted nuclear reactor in North Korea. That means that North Korea may be restarting nuclear production, six years after agreeing not to do so. The plutonium reactor would be used to produce even more weapons of mass destruction.



Even as the North Koreans restarted production, they pretended conciliation – they said they wanted to negotiate with the United States, China, Russia, South Korea, and Japan.

Democratic Strategist: Syria 'One of the Most Humiliating Episodes in Presidential History'

Democratic Strategist: Syria 'One of the Most Humiliating Episodes in Presidential History'

 377
 3
 1329
 

Print Article Send a Tip

The National Journal's Ron Fournier says a Democratic strategist "who works closely with the White House" told him that Syria "has been one of the most humiliating episodes in presidential history."

Fournier says the Democratic operative "requested anonymity to avoid political retribution."
In the wake of Obama's address to the nation Tuesday night, other progressives have expressed frustration with his handling of the Syrian crisis. Progressive Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank said Obama's speech contradicted statements by Secretary of State John Kerry just 11 hours prior to the president's remarks.
"Kerry can be forgiven for being at odds with the president," writes Milbank. "The president, in the space of his 16-minute address, was often at odds with himself... Nuance can sound a lot like a muddle."
Before the speech, progressive New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd blasted Obama's "flip-flopping, ambivalent leadership" on Syria.
"Amateur hour started when Obama dithered on Syria and failed to explain the stakes there," wrote Dowd. "It escalated last August with a slip by the methodical wordsmith about 'a red line for us'--which the president and Kerry later tried to blur as the world's red line, except the world was averting its eyes."
She added: "Obama's flip-flopping, ambivalent leadership led him to the exact place he never wanted to be: unilateral instead of unified."

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Syrian FM: We are ready to sign Chemical Weapons Convention


Syrian FM: We are ready to sign Chemical Weapons Convention

Published time: September 10, 2013 17:36
Edited time: September 10, 2013 19:13
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem (Reuters / Amr Dalsh)
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem (Reuters / Amr Dalsh)
Syria said it would sign the Chemical Weapons Convention, following Russia’s proposal that it hands over its chemical weapons to international supervisors. Damascus pledged to open its storage sites and provide full disclosure of its stocks immediately.
Follow RT's Live Updates

“We fully support Russia’s initiative concerning chemical weapons in Syria, and we are ready to cooperate. As a part of the plan, we intend to join the Chemical Weapons Convention,” Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem said in an interview with Lebanon-based Al-Maydeen TV.

“We are ready to fulfill our obligations in compliance with this treaty, including through the provision of information about our chemical weapons. We will open our storage sites, and cease production. We are ready to open these facilities to Russia, other countries and the United Nations.”
He added: “We intend to give up chemical weapons altogether.” 
The statement comes less than 24 hours after Moscow called for Damascus to hand over control over its chemical arsenal to the international community to avert a retaliatory strike by the US. Washington claims that the Assad government used chemical weapons against civilians in a Damascus suburb on August 21, killing more than 1,400 people. President Assad denies the allegation.

On Monday, US Secretary of State John Kerry said that direct action could be avoided if the Syrian government handed over “every single bit" of his chemical weapon stock within a week. Shortly afterward, Russia made a formal proposal to Damascus.
Vladimir Putin has said that he first discussed the idea with Barack Obama during the G20 meeting of the world’s biggest economies last week. In a series of TV interviews of US networks, Obama welcomed the proposal as a “possible breakthrough”, but US officials say it must not be used as a “stalling tactic” by the Assad regime.
As part of that plan, Syria would have to become a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention. Damascus had already agreed to Moscow's proposal in principle earlier on Tuesday.

Alongside North Korea, Egypt and Israel, Syria is one of only seven countries not to have joined the treaty, adopted in 1993.
Since then more than half of the world’s chemical weapons stockpile has been destroyed under the terms of the treaty by over 180 countries.
The UN Security Council will convene to discuss a statement based on Moscow’s plan in the near future.
While all members of the Council are likely to support the chemical weapons handover, there are likely to be crucial disagreements on whether the final document will assign blame for the August 21 chemical incident on Assad’s forces, and whether the door will still be open to future military intervention against his government.
Kerry and Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov have also scheduled a meeting to discuss