Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976?Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Unless you are in this field of investigative journalism, especially covering extremely sensitive subjects and potentially dangerous subjects as well, you simply cannot understand the complexities and difficulties involved with this work that I face every day.
Thursday, September 4, 2014
Russia warns NATO, U.S. over Ukraine before summit
Russia warns NATO, U.S. over Ukraine before summit
MOSCOW
Thu Sep 4, 2014 9:48am BST
1 of 2.
Russia's Foreign
Minister Sergei Lavrov (L) welcomes OSCE Parliamentary Assembly
President Ilkka Kanerva before their meeting in Moscow, September 4,
2014.
Credit: Reuters/Maxim Zmeyev
Related News
Related Topics
Sergei Lavrov also urged Kiev and pro-Russian rebels fighting Ukrainian forces in eastern Ukraine to back peace moves outlined by President Vladimir Putin and avert what he said could be a large-scale crisis in the heart of Europe.
Putin unveiled the seven-point plan on Wednesday, the eve of a NATO summit at which the crisis in Ukraine will be discussed.
"It is precisely at such a moment when a chance has emerged to start solving specific problems between Kiev and the militias that some sections of the Kiev authorities make demands for Ukraine to drop its non-aligned status and start joining NATO," Lavrov said at talks with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, a rights and security group.
"It's a blatant attempt to derail all efforts aimed at initiating a dialogue on ensuring national reconciliation."
Moscow has long said it will regard NATO membership for Ukraine as a national security threat.
Underlining Moscow's concerns about U.S. influence on Kiev, Lavrov said: "Some of our Western partners, including unfortunately the most influential players - the United States - want victory for NATO and a situation where America dictates its will to everyone."
"This concept of exclusivity, which President (Barack) Obama has repeatedly declared, can lead to no good and has so far led to no good," he said.
Lavrov promised Russia would take "practical steps" to de-escalate the crisis in Ukraine and urged Kiev and rebel leaders to accept Putin's proposals for a ceasefire.
(Reporting by Katya Golubkova, Writing by Timothy Heritage, editing by Elizabeth Piper)
FILED UNDER:
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Top CIA officer in Benghazi delayed response to terrorist attack, US security team members claim
Top CIA officer in Benghazi delayed response to terrorist attack, US security team members claim
A U.S. security team in Benghazi was held back from
immediately responding to the attack on the American diplomatic mission
on orders of the top CIA officer there, three of those involved told Fox
News’ Bret Baier.
Their account gives a dramatic new turn to what the Obama administration and its allies would like to dismiss as an “old story” – the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.
Speaking out publicly for the first time, the three were security operators at the secret CIA annex in Benghazi – in effect, the first-responders to any attack on the diplomatic compound. Their first-hand account will be told in a Fox News special, airing Friday night at 10 p.m. (EDT).
Based on the new book "13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened in Benghazi" by Mitchell Zuckoff with the Annex Security Team, the special sets aside the political spin that has freighted the Benghazi issue for the last two years, presenting a vivid, compelling narrative of events from the perspective of the men who wore the “boots on the ground.”
The security contractors -- Kris (“Tanto”) Paronto, Mark (“Oz”) Geist, and John (“Tig”) Tiegen -- spoke exclusively, and at length, to Fox News about what they saw and did that night. Baier, Fox News’ Chief Political Anchor, asked them about one of the most controversial questions arising from the events in Benghazi: Was help delayed?
Word of the attack on the diplomatic compound reached the CIA annex just after 9:30 p.m. Within five minutes, the security team at the annex was geared up for battle, and ready to move to the compound, a mile away.
“Five minutes, we're ready,” said Paronto, a former Army Ranger. “It was thumbs up, thumbs up, we're ready to go.”
But the team was held back. According to the security operators, they were delayed from responding to the attack by the top CIA officer in Benghazi, whom they refer to only as “Bob.”
“It had probably been 15 minutes I think, and … I just said, ‘Hey, you know, we gotta-- we need to get over there, we're losing the initiative,’” said Tiegen. “And Bob just looks straight at me and said, ‘Stand down, you need to wait.’”
“We're starting to get calls from the State Department guys saying, ‘Hey, we're taking fire, we need you guys here, we need help,’” said Paronto.
After a delay of nearly 30 minutes, the security team headed to the besieged consulate without orders. They asked their CIA superiors to call for armed air support, which never came.
Now, looking back, the security team said they believed that if they had not been delayed for nearly half an hour, or if the air support had come, things might have turned out differently.
“Ambassador Stevens and Sean [Smith], yeah, they would still be alive, my gut is yes,” Paronto said. Tiegen concurred.
“I strongly believe if we'd left immediately, they'd still be alive today,” he added.
In a statement to Fox News, a senior intelligence official insisted that, “There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support.”
Baier put that assertion directly to the operators.
“You use the words ‘stand down,’” Baier noted. “A number of people now, including the House Intelligence Committee insist no one was hindered from responding to the situation at the compound…so what do you say to that?”
“No, it happened,” said Tiegen.
“It happened on the ground-- all I can talk about is what happened on that ground that night,” added Paronto. “To us. To myself, twice, and to-- to Tig, once. It happened that night. We were told to wait, stand-- and stand down. We were delayed three times.”
In a statement to Fox News, a senior intelligence official did allow that the security team was delayed from responding while the CIA’s top officer in Benghazi tried to rally local support.
In the special, Baier also asks about the infamous YouTube video that was blamed for the violence in Benghazi.
Paronto laughed at the suggestion that the video played any role in the events of that night, saying he did not even know of the video until he was out of Libya and on his way home. “I didn't know about the video ‘till I got to Germany,” he said. “(I had) no idea about any video, no. No, sir.”
The full, first-hand account of what really happened in Benghazi can be seen when Fox News airs 13 hours at Benghazi: The Inside Story Friday night 10 p.m. (EDT), Saturday at 5 p.m. and 9 p.m. (EDT), and Sunday at 9 p.m. (EDT)
Their account gives a dramatic new turn to what the Obama administration and its allies would like to dismiss as an “old story” – the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.
Speaking out publicly for the first time, the three were security operators at the secret CIA annex in Benghazi – in effect, the first-responders to any attack on the diplomatic compound. Their first-hand account will be told in a Fox News special, airing Friday night at 10 p.m. (EDT).
Based on the new book "13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened in Benghazi" by Mitchell Zuckoff with the Annex Security Team, the special sets aside the political spin that has freighted the Benghazi issue for the last two years, presenting a vivid, compelling narrative of events from the perspective of the men who wore the “boots on the ground.”
The security contractors -- Kris (“Tanto”) Paronto, Mark (“Oz”) Geist, and John (“Tig”) Tiegen -- spoke exclusively, and at length, to Fox News about what they saw and did that night. Baier, Fox News’ Chief Political Anchor, asked them about one of the most controversial questions arising from the events in Benghazi: Was help delayed?
Word of the attack on the diplomatic compound reached the CIA annex just after 9:30 p.m. Within five minutes, the security team at the annex was geared up for battle, and ready to move to the compound, a mile away.
“Five minutes, we're ready,” said Paronto, a former Army Ranger. “It was thumbs up, thumbs up, we're ready to go.”
But the team was held back. According to the security operators, they were delayed from responding to the attack by the top CIA officer in Benghazi, whom they refer to only as “Bob.”
“It had probably been 15 minutes I think, and … I just said, ‘Hey, you know, we gotta-- we need to get over there, we're losing the initiative,’” said Tiegen. “And Bob just looks straight at me and said, ‘Stand down, you need to wait.’”
“We're starting to get calls from the State Department guys saying, ‘Hey, we're taking fire, we need you guys here, we need help,’” said Paronto.
After a delay of nearly 30 minutes, the security team headed to the besieged consulate without orders. They asked their CIA superiors to call for armed air support, which never came.
Now, looking back, the security team said they believed that if they had not been delayed for nearly half an hour, or if the air support had come, things might have turned out differently.
“Ambassador Stevens and Sean [Smith], yeah, they would still be alive, my gut is yes,” Paronto said. Tiegen concurred.
“I strongly believe if we'd left immediately, they'd still be alive today,” he added.
In a statement to Fox News, a senior intelligence official insisted that, “There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support.”
Baier put that assertion directly to the operators.
“You use the words ‘stand down,’” Baier noted. “A number of people now, including the House Intelligence Committee insist no one was hindered from responding to the situation at the compound…so what do you say to that?”
“No, it happened,” said Tiegen.
“It happened on the ground-- all I can talk about is what happened on that ground that night,” added Paronto. “To us. To myself, twice, and to-- to Tig, once. It happened that night. We were told to wait, stand-- and stand down. We were delayed three times.”
In a statement to Fox News, a senior intelligence official did allow that the security team was delayed from responding while the CIA’s top officer in Benghazi tried to rally local support.
In the special, Baier also asks about the infamous YouTube video that was blamed for the violence in Benghazi.
Paronto laughed at the suggestion that the video played any role in the events of that night, saying he did not even know of the video until he was out of Libya and on his way home. “I didn't know about the video ‘till I got to Germany,” he said. “(I had) no idea about any video, no. No, sir.”
The full, first-hand account of what really happened in Benghazi can be seen when Fox News airs 13 hours at Benghazi: The Inside Story Friday night 10 p.m. (EDT), Saturday at 5 p.m. and 9 p.m. (EDT), and Sunday at 9 p.m. (EDT)
No NATO Action Against Russia or Islamic State
No NATO Action Against Russia or Islamic State
- BY David Francis
- AUGUST 29, 2014 - 04:20 PM
-
Share +
664 Shares
This story has been updated.
A day after President Barack Obama said that the United States has no plan for countering the Islamic State, that it would not confront the Islamist militant group in Syria alone, and that it doesn't intend anything stronger than fiscal sanctions to punish Russia for invading Ukraine, sources within NATO said that the alliance is also unlikely to act directly.
Instead, European Union leaders, who are meeting in Brussels on Saturday, Aug. 30, are likely to issue a new round of sanctions in retaliation for Russia's most recent incursion into Ukraine. A NATO source familiar with discussions on the EU's response to Russia told Foreign Policy that the new sanctions could be levied as early as Saturday.
"It's obvious at this point that there are going to be new sanctions," the source said. "All of this was decided before what happened yesterday."
According to a British report obtained by Bloomberg, the United Kingdom will recommend banning Russia's access to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or SWIFT, a key avenue through which Russia acccesses the international financial system.
The source was referring to comments Obama made Thursday, which included his plan to build a coalition of countries willing to take the fight to the Islamic State, also known as ISIS and ISIL, in Syria.
Obama -- who will also attend the NATO summit in Wales next week -- tapped Secretary of State John Kerry to lead the diplomatic effort to get allies on board against the Sunni militant group that has seized wide swaths of territory in Iraq and Syria.
"The violence that's been taking place in Syria has obviously given ISIL a safe haven there in ungoverned spaces, and in order for us to degrade ISIL over the long term, we're going to have to build a regional strategy," Obama said during Thursday's White House news conference.
"As I've said, rooting out a cancer like ISIL will not be quick or easy, but I'm confident that we can and we will, working closely with our allies and our partners," the president added.
The source also reaffirmed Obama's assertion that there would be no immediate military response to Russia's opening of a third front in its incurious into eastern Ukraine, which came about six months after it first drew Western ire for annexing Crimea in March.
"We don't expect to have a major resolution coming from NATO. This is going to be the work of individual allies, very likely this weekend," the source said. "Where we're going to be a week from now is anyone's guess. We're going to be bound by the limitations built in the [NATO] treaty. We're not going to intervene militarily."
This source also said that NATO is not likely to act as an umbrella for any coordinated action against the Islamic State in Syria or Iraq.
"There's going to be a lot of discussion about what allies can do," the source said. "What NATO can do is more of a question. There is no intention of having a NATO multinational operation in Iraq or Syria."
The source indicated that NATO could be involved in training or supplying Iraqi troops. However, "for anything large scale, you would need to have boots on the ground, which we're not going to have."
In an interview with Foreign Policy, NATO Deputy Secretary-General Alexander Vershbow confirmed that the alliance wouldn't undertake coordinated action in Ukraine. He said that the alliance would continue "capacity building, but it's not direct security assistance. NATO simply doesn't do that. This is a question for each of the nations to decide what they can do."
On the threat posed by the Islamic State, Vershbow said that NATO could assist Iraqi forces through a training program that has been shelved since the end of the Iraq war. But he added, "There's reluctance to make a commitment [to the program] before [Iraqi politicians] get their act together."
"We have been paying more and more attention and stepping up intelligence sharing on the threat," he added. "But at this point, no one is proposing any direct military action by NATO."
These comments reinforce what Obama said Thursday. Throughout the week, multiple reports of imminent airstrikes in Syria ratcheted up expectations of impending action. However, Obama said that any action in Syria would be done only in consultation with allies. He said that he and Kerry would meet with NATO allies next week and that then Kerry would meet with cooperative leaders in the Middle East to develop a strategy to confront the group.
All this comes as Ukraine is making a new push to join NATO. Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk announced Friday that he would introduce a bill canceling his country's status as a nonaligned country and restoring "its aspirations to become a NATO member."
"This law will prohibit the Ukrainian state to become part of any other economic, political or military alliances that would hinder the main goal of accession to the EU," Yatsenyuk later wrote on Facebook.
Vershbow noted that Ukraine began the formal process of gaining NATO membership in 2008. He said it is up to Kiev to meet the standards needed to join the alliance.
"It's their choice. It's sort of the principle that every nation has the right to secure its security arrangements," he said. "Clearly, this is a very sensitive issue with the Russians."
"Ukraine's potential membership in NATO, in light of [Russia's] aggression -- many people in NATO wouldn't be surprised that they started to talk up the … option again."
New sanctions against Russia by the European Union would be a significant escalation. Since the Ukraine crisis began, Europe, led by Germany, had been reluctant to punish Russia severely, fearing collateral damage to European economies. But after pro-Russian separatists shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, the severity of European sanctions were increased, and countersanctions targeting European and American agricultural products were issued by Moscow.
Now, with Russian troops fighting along three fronts in Ukraine, it appears as if harsher sanctions are on the way. Speaking ahead of the summit, and without specifying what the new punishments would be, European foreign ministers said that they have no choice but to levy new penalties.
"The European Union should be ready to move forward with possible new measures against Russia because the situation is still getting worse," the Associated Press quoted Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet as saying.
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin remained defiant, comparing Ukraine to Nazi Germany.
"Sad as it might seem, this reminds me of the events of World War II, when the German Nazi occupants surrounded our cities, like Leningrad, and directly shelled those cities and their inhabitants," Putin said, according to state-controlled RT.
He also called on Russian-backed separatists to create a "humanitarian corridor for Ukrainian service members who have been surrounded, so as to avoid any needless loss of life, giving them the opportunity to leave the combat area unimpeded and reunite with their families, to return them to their mothers, wives, and children, and to quickly provide medical assistance to those who were injured in the course of the military operation."
Any new sanctions would have to be approved by the entire European Union. When the crisis began, the German public and business community, as well as some in the German political establishment, were reluctant to punish Putin. However, according to Ulrich Speck, visiting scholar at the Carnegie Europe think tank in Brussels, Putin's latest incursion gives German Chancellor Angela Merkel no choice but to impose harsher penalties.
"There is no other game; there is no plan B," Speck told Foreign Policy. "Neither the EU nor the U.S. is going to go to war. The only hope now is to really increase the pressure so that Putin at least will limit his recent incursion.
"This is the failure of more than half a year of really tough efforts, especially on the German side," Ulrich added. "All these meetings, all this diplomacy has really been exhausted and it failed. There is no other way to stop Putin."
A day after President Barack Obama said that the United States has no plan for countering the Islamic State, that it would not confront the Islamist militant group in Syria alone, and that it doesn't intend anything stronger than fiscal sanctions to punish Russia for invading Ukraine, sources within NATO said that the alliance is also unlikely to act directly.
Instead, European Union leaders, who are meeting in Brussels on Saturday, Aug. 30, are likely to issue a new round of sanctions in retaliation for Russia's most recent incursion into Ukraine. A NATO source familiar with discussions on the EU's response to Russia told Foreign Policy that the new sanctions could be levied as early as Saturday.
"It's obvious at this point that there are going to be new sanctions," the source said. "All of this was decided before what happened yesterday."
According to a British report obtained by Bloomberg, the United Kingdom will recommend banning Russia's access to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or SWIFT, a key avenue through which Russia acccesses the international financial system.
The source was referring to comments Obama made Thursday, which included his plan to build a coalition of countries willing to take the fight to the Islamic State, also known as ISIS and ISIL, in Syria.
Obama -- who will also attend the NATO summit in Wales next week -- tapped Secretary of State John Kerry to lead the diplomatic effort to get allies on board against the Sunni militant group that has seized wide swaths of territory in Iraq and Syria.
"The violence that's been taking place in Syria has obviously given ISIL a safe haven there in ungoverned spaces, and in order for us to degrade ISIL over the long term, we're going to have to build a regional strategy," Obama said during Thursday's White House news conference.
"As I've said, rooting out a cancer like ISIL will not be quick or easy, but I'm confident that we can and we will, working closely with our allies and our partners," the president added.
The source also reaffirmed Obama's assertion that there would be no immediate military response to Russia's opening of a third front in its incurious into eastern Ukraine, which came about six months after it first drew Western ire for annexing Crimea in March.
"We don't expect to have a major resolution coming from NATO. This is going to be the work of individual allies, very likely this weekend," the source said. "Where we're going to be a week from now is anyone's guess. We're going to be bound by the limitations built in the [NATO] treaty. We're not going to intervene militarily."
This source also said that NATO is not likely to act as an umbrella for any coordinated action against the Islamic State in Syria or Iraq.
"There's going to be a lot of discussion about what allies can do," the source said. "What NATO can do is more of a question. There is no intention of having a NATO multinational operation in Iraq or Syria."
The source indicated that NATO could be involved in training or supplying Iraqi troops. However, "for anything large scale, you would need to have boots on the ground, which we're not going to have."
In an interview with Foreign Policy, NATO Deputy Secretary-General Alexander Vershbow confirmed that the alliance wouldn't undertake coordinated action in Ukraine. He said that the alliance would continue "capacity building, but it's not direct security assistance. NATO simply doesn't do that. This is a question for each of the nations to decide what they can do."
On the threat posed by the Islamic State, Vershbow said that NATO could assist Iraqi forces through a training program that has been shelved since the end of the Iraq war. But he added, "There's reluctance to make a commitment [to the program] before [Iraqi politicians] get their act together."
"We have been paying more and more attention and stepping up intelligence sharing on the threat," he added. "But at this point, no one is proposing any direct military action by NATO."
These comments reinforce what Obama said Thursday. Throughout the week, multiple reports of imminent airstrikes in Syria ratcheted up expectations of impending action. However, Obama said that any action in Syria would be done only in consultation with allies. He said that he and Kerry would meet with NATO allies next week and that then Kerry would meet with cooperative leaders in the Middle East to develop a strategy to confront the group.
All this comes as Ukraine is making a new push to join NATO. Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk announced Friday that he would introduce a bill canceling his country's status as a nonaligned country and restoring "its aspirations to become a NATO member."
"This law will prohibit the Ukrainian state to become part of any other economic, political or military alliances that would hinder the main goal of accession to the EU," Yatsenyuk later wrote on Facebook.
Vershbow noted that Ukraine began the formal process of gaining NATO membership in 2008. He said it is up to Kiev to meet the standards needed to join the alliance.
"It's their choice. It's sort of the principle that every nation has the right to secure its security arrangements," he said. "Clearly, this is a very sensitive issue with the Russians."
"Ukraine's potential membership in NATO, in light of [Russia's] aggression -- many people in NATO wouldn't be surprised that they started to talk up the … option again."
New sanctions against Russia by the European Union would be a significant escalation. Since the Ukraine crisis began, Europe, led by Germany, had been reluctant to punish Russia severely, fearing collateral damage to European economies. But after pro-Russian separatists shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, the severity of European sanctions were increased, and countersanctions targeting European and American agricultural products were issued by Moscow.
Now, with Russian troops fighting along three fronts in Ukraine, it appears as if harsher sanctions are on the way. Speaking ahead of the summit, and without specifying what the new punishments would be, European foreign ministers said that they have no choice but to levy new penalties.
"The European Union should be ready to move forward with possible new measures against Russia because the situation is still getting worse," the Associated Press quoted Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet as saying.
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin remained defiant, comparing Ukraine to Nazi Germany.
"Sad as it might seem, this reminds me of the events of World War II, when the German Nazi occupants surrounded our cities, like Leningrad, and directly shelled those cities and their inhabitants," Putin said, according to state-controlled RT.
He also called on Russian-backed separatists to create a "humanitarian corridor for Ukrainian service members who have been surrounded, so as to avoid any needless loss of life, giving them the opportunity to leave the combat area unimpeded and reunite with their families, to return them to their mothers, wives, and children, and to quickly provide medical assistance to those who were injured in the course of the military operation."
Any new sanctions would have to be approved by the entire European Union. When the crisis began, the German public and business community, as well as some in the German political establishment, were reluctant to punish Putin. However, according to Ulrich Speck, visiting scholar at the Carnegie Europe think tank in Brussels, Putin's latest incursion gives German Chancellor Angela Merkel no choice but to impose harsher penalties.
"There is no other game; there is no plan B," Speck told Foreign Policy. "Neither the EU nor the U.S. is going to go to war. The only hope now is to really increase the pressure so that Putin at least will limit his recent incursion.
"This is the failure of more than half a year of really tough efforts, especially on the German side," Ulrich added. "All these meetings, all this diplomacy has really been exhausted and it failed. There is no other way to stop Putin."
Photo by Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images News
NATO planning 'rapid-deployment force' of 10,000 troops to counter Russia
NATO planning 'rapid-deployment force' of 10,000 troops to counter Russia
Published time: August 30, 2014 01:12
Edited time: September 02, 2014 12:32
Edited time: September 02, 2014 12:32
German troops who are part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) (Reuters / Omar Sobhani)
According to the Financial Times, the force’s creation will be spearheaded by Britain and involve contributions from Denmark, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Norway, and the Netherlands. Canada is also interested in joining the group, but it’s not known what its final decision will be.
Although no formal announcement has been made, British Prime Minister David Cameron is expected to declare its formation at the upcoming NATO summit in Wales on September 4th.
Many specifics have yet to be worked out or announced, but planners are reportedly implementing ways to increase the number of soldiers involved even more if necessary. Air and naval units will be integrated into the group, as well as ground troops led by British commanders.
As noted by the Times, the creation of the force comes as a response to Russia’s involvement in the ongoing Ukrainian crisis, with the ultimate goal being to “create a fully functioning, division-sized force for rapid deployment and regular, frequent exercises.” NATO has accused Russia of deploying more than 1,000 troops into Ukraine to bolster militia in the eastern part of the country.
Russia, however, insists that it does not have troops operating inside of Ukraine and has dismissed NATO’s assertions.
Despite the fact that NATO has opted not to act militarily in Ukraine – unnamed sources told Foreign Policy on Friday that there are no plans to confront Russia with anything more than stronger sanctions – Jonathan Eyal of the London-based Royal United Services Institute said the group needs to demonstrate that its eastern European members are just as integral to the alliance as other states.
“We need to end the idea of different zones of security in Europe,” he told the Financial Times. “We need to be talking about prepositioning, regular rotation of troops and making it very clear that we do not accept that the eastern Europeans are in some different category of membership of NATO.”
The revelation also arrives just a few days after NATO’s Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen expressed interest in forming “a more visible presence” in Eastern Europe in the form of facilities capable of rapidly receiving “response forces” needed to counter Russia.
For his part, Russia’s envoy to NATO, Aleksandr Grushko, said any attempt to stretch further into the region would impact Moscow’s own security planning.
US prepares military drill in W. Ukraine for mid-September
US prepares military drill in W. Ukraine for mid-September
Published time: September 03, 2014 00:24
Paratroopers
from the U.S. Army's 173rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team participate in
training exercises with the Polish 6 Airborne Brigade soldiers at the
Land Forces Training Centre in Oleszno near Drawsko Pomorskie, north
west Poland, May 1, 2014. (Reuters / Kacper Pempel)
READ MORE: Estonia wants NATO bases on its territory as military bloc plans expansion
Initially planned for mid-July, the exercise – code-named 'Rapid Trident' – was halted due to a significant escalation in the conflict between Kiev and the southeastern regions of Ukraine.
Now, as the fighting between the two sides continues, the US Army’s European Command (EUCOM) plans to go ahead and stage the exercise on September 16-26.
“At the moment, we are still planning for [the exercise] to go ahead,” US Navy Captain Gregory Hicks, spokesman for EUCOM, announced on Tuesday.
The annual exercise will take place at Yavoriv training center in the city of Lvov, near Ukraine's border with Poland.
Around 200 US personnel will be involved in the drill, as well as 1,100 others from Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Britain, Canada, Georgia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Romania, and Spain, EUCOM said.
In addition to staging air force exercises, the United States is moving tanks and 600 troops to Poland and the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania for joint maneuvers in October, Reuters reports. The new deployment will replace a more lightly armed force of paratroopers.
Rapid Trident 2014 is designed to “promote regional stability and security, strengthen partnership capacity and foster trust while improving interoperability between the land forces of Ukraine, and NATO and partner nations,” according to the US Forces in Europe website.
READ MORE: Russia to adjust military doctrine due to NATO expansion, Ukraine crisis
The exercise will be mainly focused on command post drills, patrolling, and dealing with improvised explosive devices.
Despite the involvement of many NATO members, Rapid Trident is not formally a NATO drill.
Image from facebook.com/ExRapidTrident2014
This year’s drill will mean the first significant deployment of US troops and other personnel to Ukraine since the crisis erupted.
Last year’s Rapid Trident, which focused on “airborne and air-mobile infantry operations,” according to a report on the Rapid Trident website, brought together 17 NATO countries for joint exercises.
The announcement comes just two days before the NATO 2014 summit is set to open in Wales. The alliance’s expansion to Eastern Europe is expected to become one of the main discussions and the 28-member bloc expects, despite internal opposition, to agree on the “more visible NATO presence in the East.”
The White House said the US and its allies are set to discuss plans to significantly increase the readiness of NATO response forces.
READ MORE: NATO planning 'rapid-deployment force' of 10,000 troops to counter Russia
White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters that the meetings within the summit are expected to involve discussions on potential trainings, exercises, and other issues regarding infrastructure and other needs in Eastern Europe.
Back in June, US President Barack Obama pledged to invest $1 billion in stepping up America's military presence in Eastern Europe amid the Ukraine crisis. Also that month, Washington vowed additional military help to Ukraine, as well as the potential training of its law enforcement and military personnel.
Rev. Graham: ‘As I Read the News, I Can’t Help But Wonder if We're in Last Hours’
Rev. Graham: ‘As I Read the News, I Can’t Help But Wonder if We're in Last Hours’
September 4, 2014 - 4:48 PM
(CNSNews.com) – Rev. Franklin Graham, head of the international Christian aid group Samaritan’s Purse and son of world-renowned preacher Billy Graham, said that given all the “bad news” about the killing of Christians by Muslims in some countries, and attacks on Christians by the media and the government even in America, he cannot “help but wonder if we are in the last hours before our Lord Jesus Christ returns.”
“As I read the news, I can’t help but wonder if we are in the last hours before our Lord Jesus Christ returns to rescue His church and God pours out His wrath on the world for the rejection of His Son,” said Rev. Graham in a post on the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA) website.
“I don’t know if we have hours, days, months, or years—but as Christians, God calls us to take the truth of the Gospel to the ends of the earth,” said Graham. “Our job is to warn sinners of the consequences of sin and show them that God is loving and gracious, willing to forgive if we come to Him in repentance and faith.”
American
journalist James Foley, a Christian, just before he was beheaded by an
ISIS jihadist. His excution was videotaped and posted on the Internet.
(Photo: YouTube.)
In his remarks, Rev. Graham talked about the spread of Ebola in Africa, noting that just in 2014 “the virus has already claimed the lives of over 1,000, making it the deadliest outbreak in history.” One of the American doctors, Kent Brantly, infected with Ebola in Liberia and flown back to the United States for treatment last month was working with Samaritan’s Purse.
As for the religious persecution in the Middle East and elsewhere, Rev. Graham questioned whether “the world is coming apart at the seams,” adding, “There appears to be no end to the bad news. The killing of Christians by Muslims from Indonesia to Bangladesh to Pakistan. China tearing down church buildings. Christians tortured, beheaded, and crucified in Iraq, with villages burned and churches destroyed, and much the same in Syria.”
“American pastor Saeed Abedini is still imprisoned in Iran for his faith,” said Rev. Graham. “Throughout Northern Africa, the Middle East, and many parts of the world, the church of Jesus Christ—and anyone or any group who bears His Name—is under attack.”
“In our own country as well, there is great opposition to the church of Jesus Christ,” he said. “We see this throughout the media, the entertainment industry, government, and politics.”
Rev. Graham continued, “Jesus warned His disciples in Matthew 24 when they asked Him about the signs of the end of the age. He said there would be wars and rumors of wars, famines, earthquakes, and pestilence. He told them, ‘Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name’s sake.’”
Franklin Graham is married, has five children, and lives in Boone, N.C. His father, Rev. Billy Graham, 95, is in poor health and not expected to live much longer. Over the years, Billy Graham preached to more than 215 million people in 185 different countries, and he wrote 31 books. For more than 50 years he has regularly been ranked among one of the most admired people in the world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)