Thursday, July 3, 2014

Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation

OHCHR header
Make a donation to OHCHR


Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation

Introduction

Access to safe driking and sanitation - credit Rachel Faigniez Having access to safe drinking water and sanitation is central to living a life in dignity and upholding human rights. Yet billions of people still do not enjoy these fundamental rights.
The rights to water and sanitation require that these are available, accessible, safe, acceptable and affordable for all without discrimination. These elements are clearly interrelated. While access to water may be guaranteed in theory, in reality, if it is too expensive, people do not have access. Women will not use sanitation facilities which are not maintained or are not sex segregated. Having a tap which delivers unsafe water does not improve one’s access. Human rights demand a holistic understanding of access to water and sanitation.
The rights to water and sanitation further require an explicit focus on the most disadvantaged and marginalized, as well as an emphasis on participation, empowerment, accountability and transparency. The mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation was established to examine these crucial issues and provide recommendations to Governments, to the United Nations and other stakeholders. Ms. Catarina de Albuquerque was appointed in September 2008, and began her work on the mandate in November 2008.

Publications



Frequently Asked Questions on the rights to water and sanitation Frequently Asked Questions on the rights to water and sanitation
English | French | Spanish
"Legal Obligations with Tangible Benefits on the rights to water and sanitation Legal Obligations with Tangible Benefits on the rights to water and sanitation
English | French | Spanish
Cover: Ending Inequalities: A cornerstone of the post-2015 development agenda Ending Inequalities: A cornerstone of the post-2015 development agenda
English | French | Spanish
Book "On the Right Track" Book on good practices in the realisation of the rights to water and sanitation
Available in English | French | Spanish
(PDF)
Fact Sheet 35 - The Right to Water Fact Sheet on the right to water
Arabic | Chinese | English | French | Russian | Spanish
 

Detroit: Disconnecting water from people who cannot pay - an affront to human rights, say UN experts

OHCHR header
Make a donation to OHCHR


Detroit: Disconnecting water from people who cannot pay - an affront to human rights, say UN experts

GENEVA (25 June 2014) – Three UN experts* on the human rights to water and sanitation, adequate housing, and extreme poverty and human rights expressed concern Wednesday about reports of widespread water disconnections in the US city of Detroit of households unable to pay water bills. “Disconnection of water services because of failure to pay due to lack of means constitutes a violation of the human right to water and other international human rights,” the experts said.

“Disconnections due to non-payment are only permissible if it can be shown that the resident is able to pay but is not paying. In other words, when there is genuine inability to pay, human rights simply forbids disconnections,” said Catarina de Albuquerque, the expert on the human right to water and sanitation.
The experts have been informed that a large-scale water shut-off for non-payment is happening in the City of Detroit, Michigan. The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department has been disconnecting water services from households which have not paid bills for two months, and has accelerated the process since early June, with the number of disconnections rising to around 3,000 customers per week. As a result, some 30,000 households are expected to be disconnected from water services over the next few months.
Because of a high poverty rate and a high unemployment rate, relatively expensive water bills in Detroit are unaffordable for a significant portion of the population.
Leilani Farha, the expert on the right to adequate housing, expressed concern that children are being removed by social services from their families and homes because, without access to water, their housing is no longer considered adequate. “If these water disconnections disproportionately affect African Americans they may be discriminatory, in violation of treaties the US has ratified,” Farha added.
“When I conducted an official country mission to the US in 2011, I encouraged the US Government to adopt a federal minimum standard on affordability for water and sanitation and a standard to provide protection against disconnections for vulnerable groups and people living in poverty. I also urged the Government to ensure due process guarantees in relation to water disconnection,” said de Albuquerque, renewing her call to the federal Government to take action.  
According to international human rights law, it is the State’s obligation to provide urgent measures, including financial assistance, to ensure access to essential water and sanitation. “The households which suffered unjustified disconnections must be immediately reconnected,” the experts said.
END
(*) The experts: the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context, Leilani Farha, the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Philip Alston, and the Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation, Catarina de Albuquerque.
Leilani Farha is the UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context. She was appointed in 2014. Ms. Farha is the Executive Director of the NGO Canada Without Poverty, based in Ottawa, Canada. A lawyer by training, for the past 20 years Ms. Farha has worked both internationally and domestically on the implementation of the right to adequate housing for the most marginalized groups, including on housing issues as the Executive Director of the Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation (CERA).
Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Housing/Pages/HousingIndex.aspx
Philip Alston is the UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. He was appointed in 2014 and is the John Norton Pomeroy Professor of Law at New York University.  Mr. Alston has served the UN in several capacities including as UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, Independent International Commission on Kyrgyzstan, Special Adviser to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Millennium Development Goals, chairperson and rapporteur of the UN Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, and UNICEF’s Senior Legal Adviser on children’s rights.
Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Poverty/Pages/SRExtremePovertyIndex.aspx
Catarina de Albuquerque is the first UN Special Rapporteur on the right to safe drinking water and sanitation. She was appointed by the Human Rights Council in 2008. Ms. de Albuquerque is a Professor at the Law Faculties of the Universities of Braga, Coimbra and of the American University’s Washington College of Law. She is a senior legal advisor at the Prosecutor General’s Office.
Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/WaterAndSanitation/SRWater/Pages/SRWaterIndex.aspx
For more information and press enquiries, please contact Madoka Saji (+41 22 917 9107 / msaji@ohchr.org) or write to srwatsan@ohchr.org. 
UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/unitednationshumanrights
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/UNrightswire
Google+ gplus.to/unitednationshumanrights   
YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/UNOHCHR
Storify: http://storify.com/UNrightswire
Check the Universal Human Rights Index: http://uhri.ohchr.org/en

Nightmare on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: President Obama's Second Term

Nightmare on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: President Obama's Second Term


by COLLEEN MCCAIN NELSON and CAROL E. LEE, Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTON—The demise of immigration legislation for the year and a Supreme Court decision creating a religious exception to the health-care law are the latest setbacks casting clouds over President Barack Obama's agenda.
The developments leave the administration with limited options. So far, the White House response has been to continue to press forward without congressional buy-in on issues such as immigration, while taking a more aggressive tack in blaming the GOP for Washington's gridlock.
On Tuesday, Mr. Obama appeared to taunt Republicans for a lawsuit that House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) has threatened to file to challenge the president's use of executive authority. "Middle-class families can't wait for Republicans in Congress to do stuff," Mr. Obama said during a speech along Washington's waterfront. "So sue me. As long as they're doing nothing, I'm not going to apologize for trying to do something."


Setbacks Cast Cloud Over Obama's Second Term

Supreme Court Decisions, Immigration-Reform Roadblock Hobble White House

July 1, 2014 3:02 p.m. ET
President Obama challenged Republicans in a speech on Tuesday Bloomberg News
WASHINGTON—The demise of immigration legislation for the year and a Supreme Court decision creating a religious exception to the health-care law are the latest setbacks casting clouds over President Barack Obama's agenda.
The developments leave the administration with limited options. So far, the White House response has been to continue to press forward without congressional buy-in on issues such as immigration, while taking a more aggressive tack in blaming the GOP for Washington's gridlock.
On Tuesday, Mr. Obama appeared to taunt Republicans for a lawsuit that House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) has threatened to file to challenge the president's use of executive authority. "Middle-class families can't wait for Republicans in Congress to do stuff," Mr. Obama said during a speech along Washington's waterfront. "So sue me. As long as they're doing nothing, I'm not going to apologize for trying to do something."
A spokesman for Mr. Boehner rejected the president's assessment. "House Republicans have passed over 40 common-sense jobs bills," said Michael Steel. He said "Democrats, led by President Obama," had blocked help to Americans.
This week, Mr. Obama conceded that his top second-term priority—overhauling immigration laws—is dead for now. And on Monday, the Supreme Court whittled away part of the president's signature health-care law, allowing closely held companies to invoke religious objections to opt out of covering contraception for their employees.
These disappointments for the White House add to a list of recent domestic and foreign-policy dilemmas. They make economic improvement and the fate of the Democrats' quest to hold their Senate majority all the more important to the success of Mr. Obama's second term.
In recent days, Mr. Obama moved the U.S. back into Iraq after championing the end of the unpopular war there. He also committed to new U.S. involvement in a Syrian civil war he had avoided.
Meantime, the president's strategy of making policy changes through executive actions to maneuver past gridlock in Congressfaces new challenges. While Mr. Boehner threatened to sue, the Supreme Court ruled that his decision to install some of his blocked nominees to the National Labor Relations Board was unconstitutional, though it upheld the president's broader powers to make appointments when Congress is in recess.
On top of this, the White House has been attempting to address the scandal at the Department of Veterans Affairs, and Republicans continue to raise concerns about misconduct at the Internal Revenue Service.
"It's a buzz saw of challenges that have come flying at the White House all at once. So now the question is: How do they handle it?" said Chris Kofinis, a Democratic strategist. "What is their strategy?…They may have one, but they've not done a spectacular job communicating it."
The challenges have harmed the president's popularity. A recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll put Mr. Obama's job-approval rating at 41% and approval of his handling of foreign policy at a new low, 37%. More than half said the president wasn't able "to lead the country and get the job done."
Mr. Obama waved off his low poll marks, telling ABC that they aren't going to be high "every minute" or every week, "because there are going to be times where the world is messy."
Robert Gibbs, Mr. Obama's former press secretary and longtime adviser, said the president "has to make the best of what he has, and that is why they've got to double down on talking every day on setting an economic vision and a message from where he sees the country moving."
Mr. Obama has sounded increasingly frustrated, telling a Minnesota crowd on Friday that Republicans "don't do anything except block me and call me names." He added, "I'm supposed to be politic about how I say things. But I'm finding lately that I just want to say what's on my mind."
A senior administration official said the speech carried the president's core message for the fall: that the Republicans favor the wealthy and do nothing in Washington, at the expense of the middle class.
Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), said the White House has shifted into "blame mode" instead of working to get things done. "It doesn't give you a lot of hope and optimism for completing big things when his answer to problems is to attack everyone else," he said.
Mr. Kofinis, the Democratic strategist, who previously served as chief of staff to Sen. Joe Manchin (D., W.Va), said Mr. Obama's attacks on Republicans likely will appeal to Democrats but do little to solve problems or attract support from centrist voters.
The White House needs to be decisive instead of reacting to events, Mr. Kofinis said. "The president has significant power to say this is what we're going to do and then do it," he said.
Dan Pfeiffer, a senior adviser to Mr. Obama, said: "Our credo is manage the things you can't control and maximize the things you can.''
White House officials have suggested that a GOP lawsuit against Mr. Obama's use of executive actions would be a misstep that would energize Democrats in November.
"Every time the Republicans attack the president for his executive actions, they are reminding the American people that unlike congressional Republicans, he is actually doing something to help them," Mr. Pfeiffer said.
The White House pushed back against suggestions it has struggled to make progress in the second term, pointing to enrollment in insurance plans through the health law and Mr. Obama's efforts to tackle climate change.
Write to Colleen McCain Nelson at colleen.nelson@wsj.com and Carol E. Lee at carol.lee@wsj.com




U.N. To Intervene In Detroit Water Shutoffs

U.N. To Intervene In Detroit Water Shutoffs

July 2, 2014
faucet-water-United-NationsUNITED NATIONS – Watch out, Detroit. Here comes the United Nations.
WND has learned that after issuing a statement last week condemning Detroit’s decision to send water shut-off notices to tens of thousands of customers behind in their payments, the U.N now plans to conduct confidential policy discussions with the Obama administration to be followed by a formal public report to the U.N. Human Rights Council.
On Monday, the U.N. Human Rights Council’s office in Geneva confirmed to WND that the U.N. plans to intervene directly in the Detroit water crisis, determined to apply international law to judge the U.S. in violation of human rights to safe water.

Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, DWSD, announced in March it would send shut-off notices to customers with balances more than $150 overdue or who are more than two months behind in their payments. The department, which said nearly half of the 324,000 water and sewerage accounts are overdue, has put out 46,000 notices since March. About 4,500 accounts have had their water shut off.
In response to a WND inquiry, Madoka Saji, a human rights officer in the Special Procedures Branch of the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland, explained in an email Monday that the U.N. plans to intervene directly in the Detroit crisis, because the Human Rights Council has received formal allegations the Detroit water shut-off threatens to violate U.N.-established human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation mandates.
Saji explained that the U.N. High Commission on Human Rights special rapporteur on safe water and sanitation, Catarina de Albuquerque , must intervene directly with the U.S. government, first in a confidential manner and then in a public manner.
The Associated Press noted in a report June 25 that de Albuquerque can make recommendations and lend “moral weight,” but she has no enforcement power.



The U.N. in Geneva further pointed out that de Albuquerque encountered similar water disconnection cases in her first official “country mission” to the United States from Feb. 22 to March 4, 2011. Her final report, Aug. 2, 2011, recommended the U.S. adopt a federal minimum standard on affordability for water and sanitation in conformity with the U.N.’s International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights .
Although the United States signed the U.N.’s International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights on Oct. 5, 1977, during the administration of President Jimmy Carter, the U.S. Senate never ratified the treaty.
Saji explained to WND that de Albuquerque has a mandate to communicate with any nation violating the U.N. covenant, whether or not the nation has ratified the document as a treaty obligation.
In a U.N. news release June 25 , de Albuquerque stated water shut-offs due to non-payment are only justified “if it can be shown that the resident is able to pay but not paying,” further alleging that “when there is genuine inability to pay, human rights simply forbids disconnections.”

Read more at http://libertycrier.com/u-n-intervene-detroit-water-shutoffs/#clpLUKMqOGgDzX82.99

Exclusive: Inside the VA's Spin-'N-Stonewall Machine

Michelle Malkin
The Public and Intergovernmental Affairs Office of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs is very concerned.
No, the communications specialists in the agency are not concerned with veterans in need. They're not concerned with citizens and public officials requesting public information. They're not concerned with journalists seeking the truth.
What these entrenched government employees care most about, above all else, is the business of spin and stonewalling.
The VA mouthpieces are preoccupied with covering their ample bureaucratic backsides, withholding data, monitoring critics, fending off watchdogs and running constant interference for their corrupt, negligent agency.
In a string of internal email documents I obtained from last fall, several VA press staffers spent seven months dragging their feet on a Freedom of Information Act request filed in March 2013 by disabled vet and attorney Benjamin Krause. He and other vets wanted to know how exactly the VA's communications budget was being spent on public relations campaigns, advertisements, online publications and contracts.
VA spokesman Mark Ballesteros warned his colleagues in an October 2013 email that he had read Krause's veterans advocacy website, DisabledVeterans.org. As I reported last week, Krause's investigative site exposed and explained the VA's red-flag system for dissatisfied veterans and also blew the whistle on Federal Protective Service officers harassing sick veterans protesting shoddy care in San Diego.
Ballesteros wrote that Krause's website "appears to have a distinct anti-VA tone." He advised the VA's taxpayer-funded public affairs specialists: "We should proceed cautiously with this one."
What exactly did that mean? Ultimately, the office supplied data in response to Krause's request -- but not before Ballesteros imposed what appears to be a selective, pre-FOIA release policy based on viewpoint discrimination. "Let's ensure the material is socialized before we provide it to the organization," Ballesteros told his colleagues.
As Krause explained it to me, the VA "is using systems that allow it to track the influence of Congress and negative reporting" across traditional and social media. Color-coded weekly and monthly "media analysis briefs" cheer on the VA's spin-control penetration on Twitter and Facebook. Bar charts, maps and ratings track congressional critics and activists. Last fall, the office kept paranoid tallies of pro and con statements on the ever-growing backlog of VA cases. Last fall's media analysis reports obsessed over "mitigating" widespread criticism -- from social media to "Fox and Friends" to "The Daily Show" -- of VA bonuses and shoddy care.
It was in the course of probing those monitoring efforts that Krause discovered that "the VA Public Affairs thinks my website is 'anti-VA' instead of 'pro-Veteran' and is using viewpoint-centric censoring within its FOIA office," he told me.
It certainly may not be the first time.
House Committee on Veterans' Affairs Chairman Rep. Jeff Miller, whose statements are tracked by the VA propaganda machine, also has run into the stone wall. As of last week, the VA was sitting on nearly 100 separate requests for information from the House panel. Sixty-eight of those requests have been pending for more than 60 days. There are three outstanding requests from 2012.
When I called attention to the internal VA documents involving Krause's FOIA request, Miller told me in a statement:
"These emails are troubling, but they are not at all surprising. Stonewalling Congress, the press and the public has become a way of life at the Department of Veterans Affairs, where entrenched bureaucrats play semantic games in an attempt to mislead. Examples of this strategy are everywhere, whether it's VA's habit of pointing to non-disciplinary actions such as employee retirements and transfers, or bureaucratic slaps on the wrist such as temporary written warnings in a disingenuous attempt to create the illusion of accountability, or the department's repeated refusals to answer questions from Congress and the press, as documented on our committee's Trials in Transparency and VA Honesty Project web pages."
Miller added: "As VA's despicable delays in care crisis made painfully clear, the department's extreme secrecy has resulted in deadly consequences. And it's well past time for department leaders at all levels to understand that taxpayer-funded organizations such as VA have a responsibility to provide information to Congress and the public rather than stonewalling them."
Whether ordinary taxpayer or congressional investigator, truth-seekers are apparently treated the same by the VA spin patrol: as nuisances and threats to their power and comfort.

Rome will be conquered next, says leader of ‘Islamic State’

Rome will be conquered next, says leader of ‘Islamic State’

27 Comments
Rome
But it’s the Islamophobes — they’re the problem.
Baghdadi, who holds a PhD in Islamic studies, vowed to take Rome. He has a PhD? I am sure Harvard has a tenured position for him. Brandeis, for sure.
Harvard fired professor Subramanian Swamy for an accurate editorial he wrote on jihad.
Brandeis withdrew an honorary degree from human rights activist and former Muslim Ayaan Hirsi Ali for her candor about Islam.
Yes, I am sure these dhimmi tools have a chair for Baghdadi.

Stay on top of what’s really happening. Follow me on Twitter here. Like me on Facebook here.
Rome will be conquered next, says leader of ‘Islamic State’
Muslims have been called to flock to the ‘Islamic State’ to gather for a battle against non-believers throughout the world
By Damien McElroy, Foreign Affairs Correspondent, The Telegraph,  01 Jul 2014
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the self-proclaimed leader of the ‘Islamic State’ stretching across Iraq and Syria, has vowed to lead the conquest of Rome as he called on Muslims to immigrate to his new land to fight under its banner around the globe.
Baghdadi, who holds a PhD in Islamic studies, said Muslims were being targetted and killed from China to Indonesia. Speaking as the first Caliph, or commander of the Islamic faithful since the dissolution of the Ottoman empire, he called on Muslims to rally to his pan-Islamic state.
“Those who can immigrate to the Islamic State should immigrate, as immigration to the house of Islam is a duty,” he said in an audio recording released on a website used by the group formerly known as the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham.
“Rush O Muslims to your state. It is your state. Syria is not for Syrians and Iraq is not for Iraqis. The land is for the Muslims, all Muslims.
“This is my advice to you. If you hold to it you will conquer Rome and own the world, if Allah wills.”
Having claimed the title of “caliph”, Baghdadi appealed to “judges and those who have military and managerial and service skills, and doctors and engineers in all fields.”
He also called on jihadi fighters to escalate fighting in the holy month of Ramadan, which began on Sunday. “In this virtuous month or in any other month, there is no deed better than jihad in the path of Allah, so take advantage of this opportunity and walk the path of you righteous predecessors,” he said. “So to arms, to arms, soldiers of the Islamic s, fight, fight.”
In a reflection of the havoc wreaked the past month by the Sunni insurgency led by the group, the United Nations said more than 2,400 people were killed in Iraq in June, making it the deadliest month in the country in years.
Baghdadi’s claims to control vast territority have yet to be tested by an Iraqi government counter attack. Many Muslim groups dispute his putative caliphate. However some experts fear his rise could transform the appeal of extremist Islam, partly by harassing social media to build a global following.
Hassan Hassan, an analyst at Abu Dhabi’s Delma Institute, wrote that Baghdadi provided the most radical challenge since the emergence of Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda. “The whispers of support to a caliph in Afghanistan are now replaced by clear words and acts, amplified by social media,” he said. “Jihadism has evolved significantly. It is no longer limited to narrow “elitists” who travel to distant countries to wage jihad. Today’s jihad is more sophisticated and individualised and can be waged everywhere.”
The Sunni insurgents’ advance, which has plunged Iraq into its worst crisis since US troops left in 2011 puts it up against avowed enemies in Shia areas.

ON THE MOVE

2 hrs ·
Dozens of migrant families from Central America arrived in Yuma Wednesday morning, and are being taken to El Centro for processing. We will have more details on this story coming up on the Early Edition at 5 p.m.