VOTER FRAUD ALERT – DO YOU KNOW THAT 20 PERCENT OF OHIO VOTERS MIGHT NOT ACTUALLY EXIST?

UPDATE: Does Eric Holder REALLY think 20% voter fraud is a civil right? A MUST READ! (click here)
UPDATE: Obama Ohio Operative Melowese Richardson Convicted of Voter Fraud. READ TO FIND OUT
UPDATE: If you think this is bad, Eric Holder told FL that non-citizens could vote in the 2012 election READ HERE
UPDATE: Two more Obama fraud convictions in Indiana READ THE FULL STORY
—–
Human Events released an article that explores the depth of voter illegitimacy in Ohio. 
In the eight months since Human Events and The Columbus Dispatch reported that several counties in the major Swing State have voter rolls that boast literally 110 percent voter registration, the Obama-Holder Justice Department has yet to investigate the widespread voter fraud that is occurring in particularly Left-leaning districts.
Human Events reported:
“In two counties, the number of registered voters actually exceeds the voting age population: Northwestern Ohio’s Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per 100 eligible.”
Human Events also said that, an additional “31 more counties report over 90 percent voter registration, which is a good 20 percent higher than the national average.” 
Furthermore, the Ohio Secretary of State, Jon Husted, said that he sent Attorney General Holder a letter in February of 2012, which warned him that “Common sense says that the odds of voter fraud increase the longer these ineligible voters are allowed to populate our rolls… I simply cannot accept that.”
Holder, nor anyone under his command, got back to the Secretary of State before the state turned Obama-Blue in November of 2012.  The Justice Department still has yet to respond.
Meanwhile, voter fraud continues to be a major issue in Ohio and around the country as a whole.
Human Events said that nationally, “The Pew Center for the States estimates about 24 million ineligible voter registrations, including more than 1.8 million dead people listed as voters; about 2.75 million with voter registrations in more than one state; and about 12 million voter records with incorrect addresses.”
While these numbers are staggering, what is even more shocking is that despite the Justice Department being made aware of these facts, Eric Holder still opposes a national requirement for voters to show ID in order to cast their ballot.
People have to present ID to cash a check, buy a beer, test drive a car, and sign their children out when they get picked up for day care.
Why does Eric Holder think casting a ballot to elect local, state, and national leaders is so much less significant?

DOES ERIC HOLDER REALLY THINK TWENTY PERCENT OHIO VOTER FRAUD IS A CIVIL RIGHT?

By Joe Calandra Jr.

Published: May 30, 2013  
UPDATE: Who needs to be a citizen to vote anyway? Attorney General Holder supported Florida voter fraud as a means of affirmative action. A MUST READ
Yesterday, Liberty News reported that Ohio’s Secretary of State, John Husted, has confirmed that during the 2012 reelection of President Barack Hussein Obama, one in every five voters in that pivotal state was potentially fraudulent.
Today, we will take a closer look at how and why the Holder Department of Justice is still stopping Ohio’s Conservative Chief Election Officer from doing his job and eliminating voter fraud in the Buckeye State.
The Ohio Secretary of State’s website confirms that the state’s theoretical elections buck should stop with him: “The Elections Division of the Secretary of State’s office also compiles and maintains election statistics, political party records and other election-related records.”
Yet, in reality, it seems like Ohio’s Tenth Amendment rights have been trampled by the federal government, since apparently, the real Chief Elections Officer in Ohio is actually Eric Holder!
During the 2012 election, John Husted tried to do and his job and purge the voter records maintained by his office of fraudulent voter IDs, including removing the names of deceased citizens, convicted felons who are ineligible to vote, and the names of people who have simply moved away.
Husted sent a letter to Attorney General Holder nine months before the 2012 election saying:
“As Ohio’s chief elections official, it is my responsibility to ensure the votes of every eligible voter are counted and ensure the integrity and accuracy of the results.  This is a difficult task when federal regulations limit Ohio’s ability to remove ineligible names, thereby increasing the chance for voter fraud.”
The federal regulations Mr. Husted is speaking of are the incumbent Attorney General’s interpretation of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Voter Registration Act, which are laws that protect the civil rights of minorities in particular.
Secretary Husted’s letter even included Ohio’s 2010 Census data for Holder to compare with the voter registration records, which Husted also gave to Holder, so that he could see the potential for widespread voter fraud on Election Day for himself.
Holder never replied to Husted’s request for a face-to face meeting or a letter of his own.
It could be argued that what Holder did next was wage war against the Tenth Amendment in Ohio, using these fraudulent entries as a means of statewide affirmative action.
Using taxpayer dollars, the DOJ deployed “election monitors” to polling precincts and various election districts across Ohio before, during, and after the election to “ensure minority voting rights were being upheld.”  The DOJ website lists pages of announcements of such activity by its agents.
The DOJ even began filing lawsuits against individual Ohio municipalities whose local election regulations could be seen, through a liberal lens, to place economic and racial minorities, who tend to vote more in-line with Team Obama, at a disadvantage in the process.
Want an example of such a heinous abuse which required the DOJ to “rescue” the disenfranchised?  The City Council of Euclid, OH had been electing representatives in an at-large manner.  Holder’s DOJ thought that the city should be using a more geographic-sensitive means of electing council members so that each district would be represented by a true peer.  So, the DOJ’S Civil Rights Division filed a federal lawsuit against the City Council for discrimination.
It could be said that while Mr. Husted is bound in the chains of unnecessary federal litigation designed to use voter fraud as a means of affirmative action, the Ohio Secretary of State is still unable to do his job for OH.
Not only does Holder’s extreme judicial activism make Ohio suffer, but, until this situation gets fixed; the rest of America will continue to see federal elections pivot on a state’s elections where twenty-five percent of the electorate is a federally sanctioned fraud.

• 

INFAMOUS OBAMA OHIO POLL WORKER, MELOWESE RICHARDSON, STANDS CONVICTED OF MULTIPLE COUNTS OF VOTER FRAUD

By Joe Calandra Jr.

Published: May 30, 2013 | 6 Comments

 1682 15

 

 1 1724 15

You remember Melowese Richardson, right?
She is the Obama supporter and Ohio poll worker who said that she voted for President Obama twice during the 2012 election, but said that she committed no voter fraud in her mind.  She said that she didn’t commit voter fraud even after she voted for Obama on behalf of her relatives who were not present, multiplying the times she voted for Barack Obama in the Swing State during the 2012 election.
This week, the fifty-eight year-old woman has been convicted of illegal voting and now faces up to six years in federal prison for voter fraud!
Richardson had served as an Ohio poll worker since 1998.  She was, however, fired this year.  She told Judge Robert Ruehlman that she had committed voter fraud, voting illegally in at least three elections – 2008, 2011, and 2012.  She admitted her guilt in all eight counts of fraud and will be sentenced on July 8, 2013.
Cincinnati.com said that Richardson even said she was guilty of “Voting three times for a relative who has been in a coma since 2003 – in exchange for prosecutors dropping four other illegal voting charges.”
The real problem here is that Ms. Richardson’s crimes are the tip of a very large iceberg of fraudulent activity in the Swing State.
Ms. Richardson is the third person in just Hamilton County, OH to be convicted of voter fraud this year.
Sister Marguerite Kloos, 55 and Russell Glossop, 76, were convicted of voter fraud after pleading guilty to voting for dead people.
However, since they only had one count of fraud charged against them each, their crime was seen as less severe.
So, their judge let them off with a warning in a judicial process called, “diversion,” meaning that if they keep their noses clean and don’t vote for dead people again, their convictions will be erased and they can earn back their right to vote once more.
Just wait though…there’s more…Cincinnati.com reported that three other people have been indicted for illegal voting in OH – Margaret I. Allen, 64, Ernestine Strickland, 84, and Andre Wilson, 49, all also have voter fraud cases pending before an Ohio court.

WHO NEEDS TO BE A CITIZEN TO VOTE ANYWAY? ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER SUPPORTED FLORIDA VOTER FRAUD AS A MEANS OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

By Joe Calandra Jr.

Published: May 30, 2013 | 3 Comments

 552 23

 

 3 649 68

As even Left-Leaning media outfits like MSNBC begin to turn their backs on the now clearly corrupt, U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, many journalists have started to tell the American people the truth about Holder’s war on the Tenth Amendment, State’s Rights, and common sense.
Two days from now, it will have been one year since The Blaze originally reported that Eric Holder demanded that the Swing State of Florida retain non-U.S. citizens on their voting rolls.  It is only now, one year after the crime, that anyone other than Conservatives are starting to care.
Nine months before Obama’s reelection, Eric Holder’s Department of Justice told the Florida Secretary of State that they were not permitted to purge their voting rolls of potential non-citizens without seeking federal DOJ approval from the Civil Rights Division first.
Holder reminded Florida elections officials that the Voting Rights Act protects those potential non-citizen voters from being prematurely prevented from voting simply because they come from a “minority race” and/or a “minority language group.
The Blaze reported that Liberals objected to the potential purge simply because:
“Independent voters and Democrats are the most likely to face being purged from the rolls.  Republicans and non-Hispanic whites are the least likely.”
Liberals, of course, are not mentioning that the most important part of Florida’s request was that the people they wanted to remove from the rolls were not American citizens.  Florida didn’t want to remove Hispanics for being Hispanic.  They wanted to ensure that people who were voting actually had a right to vote, which non-citizens do not.
Never-the-less, Holder went to war with Florida as state election officials purged many of the names in advance of the election against Holder’s expressed orders.
This case, when taken together with Holder’s demands that the Swing State of Ohio retain the names of deceased citizens on its voter rolls and accept one-hundred and ten percent voter registration numbers as factual to preserve the “civil rights” of minorities in the state, reveals that Eric Holder seems to support using voter fraud as a means of helping potentially Left- Leaning voters attain electoral affirmative action.  

See the Letter the DOJ Sent to Florida Demanding It Stop Purging Non-Citizens from Voter Rolls

Jun. 1, 2012 9:44am Jonathon M. Seidl

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) demanded the state of Florida stop its efforts to purge non-citizens from its voting rolls. A letter sent to Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner alleges the process violates the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the 1993 National Voter Registration Act.
The major charge of the letter reads:

Talking Points Memo (TPM) breaks it down:

The Justice Department sent a letter to Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner Thursday evening demanding the state cease purging its voting rolls because the process it is using has not been cleared under the Voting Rights Act, TPM has learned.
DOJ also said that Florida’s voter roll purge violated the National Voter Registration Act, which stipulates that voter roll maintenance should have ceased 90 days before an election, which given Florida’s August 14 primary, meant May 16.

The Miami Herald further explains that “Under the Voting Rights Act, Florida needs federal approval before it makes changes to voting because five Florida counties – Monroe, Hillsborough, Collier, Hardee and Hendry – had minority-voting troubles decades ago.” It also notes what has been done so far:

So far, Florida has flagged 2,700 potential noncitizen voters and sent the list to county elections supervisors, who have found the data and methodology to be flawed and problematic. The list of potential noncitizen voters – many of whom have turned out to be lawful citizens and voters – disproportionately hits minorities, especially Hispanics.
About 58 percent of those flagged as potential noncitizens are Hispanics, Florida’s largest ethnic immigrant population, a Miami Herald analysis found. Hispanics make up 13 percent of the overall 11.3 million active registered voters.
Independent voters and Democrats are the most likely to face being purged from the rolls. Republicans and non-Hispanic whites are the least likely.

“We are firmly committed to doing the right thing and preventing ineligible voters from being able to cast a ballot,” said Chris Cate, spokesman for Secretary of State Ken Detzner, responded to the Herald.
TPM Docs: DOJ Demands Florida Stop Voter PurgeTPM Docs: DOJ Demands Florida Stop Voter Purge http://www.scribd.com/doc/95500652/TPM-Docs-DOJ-Demands-Florida-Stop-Voter-Purge

• Share this article

Obama Accepting Sequestration as Deficit Shrinks

By Hans Nichols & Mike Dorning - May 28, 2013 12:00 AM ET

Play

Barack Obama on U.S. Economic Growth Outlook

President Barack Obama has stopped worrying and learned to live with sequestration.

Enlarge image

U.S. President Barack Obama is adjusting to the spending curbs he once derided as "just dumb," and attacks on sequestration have receded as a major theme of his speeches. Photographer: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Enlarge image

With the economy growing, unemployment falling, Republicans unmoved in resisting tax increases and little sign of the public backlash the White House expected, Obama is adjusting to the spending curbs he once derided as “just dumb.” Photographer: Joshua Roberts/Bloomberg

Gone are the cold February predictions of mass layoffs, family upheaval and the prospect of a new recession because of the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts. Cabinet secretaries no longer visit the White House briefing room to offer dire forecasts about teacher firings or unsecured borders.
With the economy growing, unemployment falling, Republicans unmoved in resisting tax increases and little sign of the public backlash the White House expected, Obama is adjusting to the spending curbs he once derided as “just dumb.” Attacks on sequestration have receded as a major theme of his speeches.
“He probably has concluded that he can’t change it,” said Stan Greenberg, a Democrat who was a pollster for former President Bill Clinton. “He’s moved away from it because he thinks it’s giving Republicans leverage by focusing on it.”
As the president’s criticism of sequestration wanes, so do prospects for a budget deal big enough to address the U.S.’s long-term fiscal debt, a goal central to helping cement Obama’s legacy that has eluded him since midway through his first term.
Sequestration was designed to be so intolerable to both Republicans and Democrats that the parties would be motivated to reach a broad budget accord to avert the cuts, which would slash spending by $1.2 trillion over nine years. Republicans were supposed to come to the table to stop reductions in defense outlays -- which are targeted for about half the cuts -- and Democrats to restore funding for domestic programs such as special education, jobless benefits and medical research.

War Weary

The administration failed to appreciate the decline in Republican support for military spending after the unpopular wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, making the threat of defense cuts less potent, said Steven Bell, a onetime top Senate Republican budget aide.
“The number of people in the Republican caucus who knee-jerk say we need to have more defense spending is dropping dramatically,” said Bell, who is now a senior director at the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington. “I don’t think there is any way to overstate the psychological toll those two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has taken.”
The administration continues to seek a deal that would at least avoid larger automatic spending reductions, in talks with Republican senators, including John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. The lawmakers remain concerned about even deeper military cuts scheduled for next year.
Still, Bell said, “I really don’t see how they will get a major deficit-reduction deal or a tax-reform deal” after more than two years of stalemate because the sequestration isn’t forcing a compromise and the deficit is declining on its own.

Revenue Surge

The deficit is losing some of its political urgency as it falls because of a 15 percent jump in revenue from last year with the economy’s expansion, the expiration of a payroll-tax cut, and tax rates rising for married couples earning more than $450,000. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the gap this year will narrow to $642 billion, from $1.1 trillion last year.
Though the budget office projects that sequestration will subtract 0.6 percentage point from the economy’s growth this year, Americans’ job prospects are improving and financial markets are gaining.
The unemployment rate fell to 7.5 percent in April from 7.9 percent at the beginning of the year. The stock market has reached record levels, with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) rising almost 16 percent this year.

Bonds Gain

Investors remain sanguine about the government’s financial outlook. The yield on the 10-year Treasury (USGG10YR) note was 2.01 percent on May 24 in New York compared with 2.38 percent on Jan. 20, 2009, the day Obama was inaugurated for his first term.
Obama is painting a picture in speeches of a resilient economy that’s poised for robust growth. The gross domestic product increased at a 2.5 percent annual rate in the first three months of this year, though private forecasters anticipate growth in the second quarter will slow to 1.6 percent, according to the median estimate of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.
To be sure, the president still brings up sequestration, mentioning it in at least four speeches this month, including on May 24, when he told graduates of the U.S. Naval Academy, “I’ll keep fighting to end those foolish across-the-board budget cuts,” which he said are “threatening our readiness.”
Sequestration, which will trim as much as $85 billion from the budget this fiscal year, will force the government to curtail services and lay off or furlough employees, including at the White House. Obama has said it will lead to the shutdown of campgrounds at national parks, reduce the number of children in the Head Start program, and eliminate 4 million meals for seniors.

Employee Furloughs

The Pentagon will impose furloughs of 11 days starting on July 8 on as many as 680,000 civilian employees, U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said on May 14.
Still, when the president now brings up the possible effects of sequestration, it’s usually a few brief lines at a private fundraiser or in a speech dedicated to another topic.
“The fact is our deficits are going down faster than they have gone down in decades,” he said May 17 in Baltimore as he touted efforts to push infrastructure projects. “The American auto industry is thriving. American energy is booming.”
Obama also mentioned “this, you know, sequester that is slowing down growth,” as he pressed Congress to pass a budget that undoes the cuts, which went into effect on March 1. When he signed legislation on May 1 to end furloughs for air traffic controllers, there was no ceremony.

Seeking Compromise

White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage blamed Republicans for not working with Obama to find a solution to “these harmful, across-the-board cuts.” The president proposed a compromise in his latest budget that would eliminate sequestration and continue to lower the deficit, she said in a May 24 e-mail.
While some cabinet members, including Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew and Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Alan Krueger have consistently sounded the alarm about the effect the cuts will have on growth, Obama has largely moved on for now.
His allies say the president’s revamped rhetoric betrays an acceptance of the political reality that the cuts will remain in place until the summer, and perhaps longer.
With Republicans refusing to compromise on possible tax increases, he’s left with a “moderately performing economy that’s not in crisis, that’s addressing many long-term problems, including the deficit,” Greenberg said.

Rhetoric Shift

Obama began to shift his rhetoric on the cuts the day they were put in force. After warning for weeks that the impact would be swift and severe, he went to the White House briefing room and told reporters: “Not everyone will feel the pain of these cuts right away. The pain, though, will be real.”
Four days earlier, in Newport News, Virginia, he told the country to brace for the worst. “Companies are starting to prepare for layoff notices,” he said. “And the longer these cuts are in place, the greater the damage.”
Yet the public discontent that some of Obama’s senior advisers anticipated once the automatic spending cuts kicked in hasn’t materialized, except for a flurry of media coverage when the air-traffic controller furloughs began causing flight delays. Congress passed legislation to keep the controllers on duty by taking money out of a fund for airport improvements.
“The impact other than the air traffic controllers is diffuse,” Bell said. “Unless you know a federal worker who is being furloughed or a small business with a contract that is canceled, 90 percent of Americans don’t feel an immediate impact.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Hans Nichols in Washington at hnichols2@bloomberg.net;
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Komarow at skomarow1@bloomberg.net

Issa: Carney Is a 'Paid Liar'

By Noel Sheppard | June 02, 2013 | 09:42  95  226 Reddit4  8

A  A

Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, made a harsh statement about White House press secretary Jay Carney Sunday.
Appearing on CNN’s State of the Union, Issa, before pointing to a picture of Carney, referred to him as the White House’s “paid liar” (video follows with transcript and commentary):

CONGRESSMAN DARRELL ISSA, R-CALIFORNIA: These transcripts will all be made public.
CANDY CROWLEY, CNN: Why don’t you put the whole thing out? Because you know our problem really here is, and you know that your critics say that Republicans and you in particular sort of cherry-pick information that go to your foregone conclusion. And so it worries us to put this kind of stuff out. Can you not put the whole transcript out?
ISSA: The whole transcript will be put out. We understand, these are in real time. And the administration is still, their paid liar, their spokesperson, picture behind, he’s still making up things about what happens and calling this local rogue.

The camera pulled back at that point to expose the picture of Carney on the screen behind Crowley.

ISSA: The reason Lois Lerner tried to take the fifth is not because there’s a rogue in Cincinnati. It’s because this is a problem that was coordinated in all likelihood right out of Washington headquarters and we're getting to proving it. We have eighteen more transcribed interviews to do.
CROWLEY: But as yet you don't have that direct link. You have the frontline agents going, “Yeah, I mean, we figured it was from Washington or I believe it was,” but as of yet you don't have that definitive, “Yeah, this guy called me and said, ‘People, go look for Tea Party and patriot applications?’”
ISSA: The President’s spokesperson is saying whatever is convenient at the time and the story changes.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/06/02/issa-carney-paid-liar#ixzz2V55GwBB2

Issa: Carney Is a 'Paid Liar'

By Noel Sheppard | June 02, 2013 | 09:42  95  226 Reddit4  8

A  A

Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, made a harsh statement about White House press secretary Jay Carney Sunday.
Appearing on CNN’s State of the Union, Issa, before pointing to a picture of Carney, referred to him as the White House’s “paid liar” (video follows with transcript and commentary):

CONGRESSMAN DARRELL ISSA, R-CALIFORNIA: These transcripts will all be made public.
CANDY CROWLEY, CNN: Why don’t you put the whole thing out? Because you know our problem really here is, and you know that your critics say that Republicans and you in particular sort of cherry-pick information that go to your foregone conclusion. And so it worries us to put this kind of stuff out. Can you not put the whole transcript out?
ISSA: The whole transcript will be put out. We understand, these are in real time. And the administration is still, their paid liar, their spokesperson, picture behind, he’s still making up things about what happens and calling this local rogue.

The camera pulled back at that point to expose the picture of Carney on the screen behind Crowley.

ISSA: The reason Lois Lerner tried to take the fifth is not because there’s a rogue in Cincinnati. It’s because this is a problem that was coordinated in all likelihood right out of Washington headquarters and we're getting to proving it. We have eighteen more transcribed interviews to do.
CROWLEY: But as yet you don't have that direct link. You have the frontline agents going, “Yeah, I mean, we figured it was from Washington or I believe it was,” but as of yet you don't have that definitive, “Yeah, this guy called me and said, ‘People, go look for Tea Party and patriot applications?’”
ISSA: The President’s spokesperson is saying whatever is convenient at the time and the story changes.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/06/02/issa-carney-paid-liar#ixzz2V55GwBB2

Former IRS commissioner's visits to White House become friction point

Douglas Shulman, former head of the IRS, visited the White House 157 times, according to the public visitor records released by the White House.

In congressional testimony earlier this month, Shulman was quizzed on his visits to the White House. He attributed one visit to taking his children to the annual Easter egg roll hosted by the president and first lady, but said at no point did he talk to anyone at the White House about the agency's tax exempt rules.
"If someone had asked me if I were 157 times, and I wasn't, I would have known the answer, and I would have given that answer," said CNN contributor and Republican strategist Kevin Madden. "And here we are, a week later, and we're still arguing about it."

Democrats say there is fuzzy math at play, that Shulman did not always meet with the president and that meetings were not always at the White House, they could have taken place at the old executive office.
"This is a fabricated debate, just because [Fox News anchor] Bill O'Reilly is raising questions about it, it doesn't mean there's actually anything going on here," said CNN contributor and Democratic strategist Stephanie Cutter.
"The clear question in the mind of the public is going to be, 'Was this kind of differential treatment ordered by anyone beyond the IRS?'" said CNN senior political analyst and editorial director for 'National Journal' Ron Brownstein.
In other words, did the White House order the IRS to target conservative groups seeking tax exempt status?
"The evidence that we have right now, is an Inspector General report which says no, there was no outside influence," said Cutter.
"The Lead's" political panel also tackled former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's declining poll numbers. Check out their discussion in the video above.

Posted by Jake Tapper Filed under: Politics Lead

Leave a comment »

0
inShare

More sharing

Benghazi Truth: Obama Was Running Secret Army ~ Dr. Steve Pieczenik

Benghazi Truth: Obama Was Running Secret Army ~ Dr. Steve Pieczenik

Alex Jones continues to seek the truth behind the Benghazi debacle that left four Americans dead in Libya Sept 11, 2012, which the White House falsely claimed was fallout stemmed from an anti-Islamic YouTube video. Dr. Steve Pieczenik also analyzes Israel's and the US' increased efforts to invade Syria by funding, aiding and arming so-called rebels, many of which are affiliated with the al-Qaeda offshoot Jabhat al-Nusra.

You might also like:

• The Alex Jones Show : Lord Christopher Monckton, Steve Pieczenik - Thursday, May 09, 2013 (Full Show)
• Steve Quayle World in Chaos
• Special urgent broadcast: Financial insider & Steve Quayle
• Steve Quayle & The Guerrilla Economist ~ The Hagmann & Hagmann Report May 24 2013
• Why The Fed Fueled the Gold Fall ~ Steve Forbes

 

Committing Treason and Benghazi Murder Cover-up

Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on pinterest_shareMore Sharing Services39

by Sartre Batr

Take off your partisan hat and open your minds to the actual uninterrupted high treason that is part of the foreign policy establishment. Party politics is often just a show that plays to their respective bases. However, the tract and direction of extending the transnational empire just continues on a global scale. The full-blown treason committed by every administration that practices the internationalist vision of democracy domination is really a masquerade for worldwide dominion. Presidents are mere temporary talking heads for the oligarchy that actually rules. Murdering their own diplomats and hired help is incidental, when 1,455,590 Iraqi deaths since the U.S. invasion are ignored and dismissed.
Just how well is the consistent and bipartisan aggressive interventionist foreign policy doing? Go over the list of The Arab Spring country by country.
The Wall Street Journal provides a timeline on U.S. Government Reaction to the Benghazi Attack. “For days after the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, Libya, intelligence officials and the Obama administration said it was likely the outgrowth of protests sparked by an anti-Islamic video made in the U.S. Follow some of the administration statements on the Libya attack.”The infamous propaganda voice for the Obamaistas, Media Matters puts forth their partisan spin in, What Dick Cheney’s Benghazi Criticism Misses.
“David Martosko of the Daily Mail Online provided former Vice President Dick Cheney a platform to criticize the Obama administration’s failure to anticipate the September 11, 2012 attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya, without noting that seven attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities occurred during the Bush administration.”
Such diversion seeks to limit focus on the literal events that caused the Benghazi attack and the real reasons why Ambassador Christopher Stevens was left to perish by the Obama/Clinton foreign policy team of betrayers.
The shameful chronicle of the intentional and politically motivated stand down that doomed Stevens and his defenders was sensitively told during Gregory Hicks’ 30 Minute Recount of Benghazi Attack. While the Congressional hearings were praised for the attempt to restrain partisan grandstanding, the Washington press corps avoids placing blame on the administration as a tenant of their loyalty test. A government cover-up is made easy when the imperium friendly media is reporting on a proclaimed progressive administration.
The facts necessitate that even the venerable CBS mainstream media machine reluctantly admits that the Thousands of Libyan missiles from Qaddafi era missing in action, are a central concern with the overthrow of the Libyan regime.
“In the case of Libya’s missing MANPADS, there was also concern they would get into the Syrian conflict. “Once they start getting sold on the black market, we can’t control them,” says one source.
The source added he’s unaware of any U.S. attempt to send recovered Libyan MANPADS to arm Syrian rebels seeking to depose President Bashar al-Assad.”
According to the Business Insider, the veracity of this CBS source is questionable. Connect the dots and go back to the reason why a cover-up of the Benghazi murders becomes crucial to the long-term goals to destabilize the Middle East. The US Is Openly Sending Heavy Weapons From Libya To Syrian Rebels cites the following:
“The Obama administration has decided to launch a covert operation to send heavy weapons to Syrian rebels, Christina Lamb of The Sunday Times of London reports.
Diplomatic sources told the Sunday Times that the U.S. “bought weapons from the stockpiles of Libya’s former dictator Muammar Gaddafi.”
The heavy arms include mortars, rocket propelled grenades, anti-tank missiles and the controversial anti-aircraft heat-seeking SA-7 missiles, which are integral to countering Bashar Al-Assad’s bombing campaign.”
Now compute the decades old design for the territory as stated by Wes Clark and the neocon dream. Glenn Greenwald provides further documentation in Salon that the various Middle Eastern and North African wars were planned before 9/11:
“General Wesley Clark … said the aim of this plot [to "destroy the governments in ... Iraq, ... Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran"] was this: “They wanted us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our control.” He then recounted a conversation he had had ten years earlier with Paul Wolfowitz — back in 1991 — in which the then-number-3-Pentagon-official, after criticizing Bush 41 for not toppling Saddam, told Clark: “But one thing we did learn [from the Persian Gulf War] is that we can use our military in the region – in the Middle East – and the Soviets won’t stop us. And we’ve got about 5 or 10 years to clean up those old Soviet regimes – Syria, Iran [sic], Iraq – before the next great superpower comes on to challenge us.” Clark said he was shocked by Wolfowitz’s desires because, as Clark put it: “the purpose of the military is to start wars and change governments? It’s not to deter conflicts?”
The diabolic union between Neoconservatives and Neoliberals produces a litter of demonic adventures that build up the body count and push the region into a globalist cesspit of satanic dimensions. In order to comprehend the interconnection of conflicts it is important to understand the deceptive war on terror and the assembled alliance with the Al Qaeda bogyman.
The message in the essay, It’s Dishonest to Talk about Benghazi Without Talking About the Syrian War, is a reality that many cowardly Americans are unwilling to deal with, much less act upon.
“Both parties are avoiding the bigger picture … The fact that Democrats and Republicans alike have been using Benghazi as the center of U.S. efforts to arm the Al Qaeda-affiliated Syrian rebels.
Specifically, the U.S. supported opposition which overthrew Libya’s Gadaffi was largely comprised of Al Qaeda terrorists.
According to a 2007 report by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center’s center, the Libyan city of Benghazi was one of Al Qaeda’s main headquarters – and bases for sending Al Qaeda fighters into Iraq – prior to the overthrow of Gaddafi:”
What possible justification is there to intervene in Syria? The presupposed civil war is really a designed coup d’état overthrow that only benefits a greater Israel regional expansion. Note how the policy wonks work in their nefarious planning for destabilization. The flagship establishment mouthpiece Foreign Policy has the mission to signal the intentions of government stratagem as the master plans are implemented, in the article How to destabilize the Assad regime.
“In order to re-up its strategy, the administration should employ a cross-governmental approach that enlists the Treasury, Commerce, and Defense Departments. The Treasury Department should use sanctions to limit Assad’s ability to repatriate funds from oil exports and more properly enforce the 2012 GRAHVITY sanctions prohibiting the transfer of internet, communications, or surveillance technology to Syria. The Treasury Department should also prohibit U.S. companies from doing business with Assad’s enablers by designating those entities that continue to supply him with resources. Congress could bolster the latter measure by requiring federal contractors to certify that they are not in business with Assad’s enablers. Congress should also prohibit foreign financial institutions enabling Assad from doing business with U.S. banks. Meanwhile the Commerce Department should secure tighter control over the delivery of information and communications technology to Syria especially through authorized foreign distributors. Finally, as mandated by an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013, the Pentagon should cease its business with Rosoboronexport, one of Assad’s chief enablers, instead of entering into new contracts as it has expressed the intention to do.”
What do you call the treachery, when your own government is committing the subversiveness?
The cryptic psychopolitical spook Dr. Steve Pieczenik presents an astounding analysis that answers this question in the You Tube, Benghazi Truth: Obama Was Running Secret Army. His call to action is a rare and daring challenge to the military that is worth a sober assessment if for no other reason than observing the anxious and flabbergasted reaction from Alex Jones. The treason committed, depends upon the nationalist loyalties of the government agents. In this case, the evidence seems well placed that the security apparatus is serving the wrong master.
The substance of the Benghazi duplicity and scandalous evasion of accountability is an entrenched practice that permeates every level of command and control. The courage of Gregory Hicks, Mark Thompson and Eric Nordstrom is an act of legitimate patriotism seldom seen out of Foggy Bottom.
If professional State Department public servants can speak truth to power, where are the guts of the General Military Officers? If the Joint Chiefs of Staff is a brood of poodle puppies and lap dogs, God Save the Republic. Dr. Pieczenik is In Search of James Mattoon Scott. Most subservient subjects are oblivious to the Seven Days in May scenario. Perpetuating the myth, that civilian command preserves the constitutional liberties of citizens, does not conform to the record of presidential dictatorship. When state treason is codified normality, the mere murder of four more Americans is hardly an afterthought to the executioners of the country. Respecting commander in chief traitors is an absurd national death wish.
SARTRE – May 12, 2013
Read the entire article on the BATR archive page
Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum