SARTRE
Activist Post
Take off your partisan hat and open your minds to the actual
uninterrupted high treason that is part of the foreign policy
establishment. Party politics is often just a show that plays to their
respective bases. However, the track and direction of extending the
transnational empire just continues on a global scale. The full-blown
treason committed by every administration that practices the
internationalist vision of democracy domination is really a masquerade
for worldwide dominion.
Presidents are mere temporary talking heads for the oligarchy that
actually rules. Murdering their own diplomats and hired help is
incidental, when
1,455,590 Iraqi deaths since the U.S. invasion are ignored and dismissed.
Just how well is the consistent and bipartisan aggressive interventionist foreign policy doing? Go over the list of
The Arab Spring country by country.
The Wall Street Journal provides a timeline on
U.S. Government Reaction to the Benghazi Attack.
For days after the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, Libya, intelligence
officials and the Obama administration said it was likely the outgrowth
of protests sparked by an anti-Islamic video made in the U.S. Follow
some of the administration statements on the Libya attack.
The infamous propaganda voice for the Obamaistas, Media Matters puts forth their partisan spin in,
What Dick Cheney's Benghazi Criticism Misses.
David Martosko of the Daily Mail Online provided former Vice President
Dick Cheney a platform to criticize the Obama administration's failure
to anticipate the September 11, 2012 attacks on U.S. diplomatic
facilities in Benghazi, Libya, without noting that seven attacks on U.S.
diplomatic facilities occurred during the Bush administration.
Such diversion seeks to limit focus on the literal events that caused
the Benghazi attack and the real reasons why Ambassador Christopher
Stevens was left to perish by the Obama/Clinton foreign policy team of
betrayers.
The shameful chronicle of the intentional and politically motivated
stand down that doomed Stevens and his defenders was sensitively told
during
Gregory Hicks' 30 Minute Recount of Benghazi Attack.
While the Congressional hearings were praised for the attempt to
restrain partisan grandstanding, the Washington press corps avoids
placing blame on the administration as a tenant of their loyalty test. A
government cover-up is made easy when the imperium-friendly media is
reporting on a proclaimed progressive administration.
The facts necessitate that even the venerable CBS mainstream media machine reluctantly admits that the
Thousands of Libyan missiles from Qaddafi are missing in action, are a central concern with the overthrow of the Libyan regime.
In the case of Libya's missing MANPADS, there was also concern they
would get into the Syrian conflict. "Once they start getting sold on the
black market, we can't control them," says one source.
The source added he's unaware of any U.S. attempt to send recovered
Libyan MANPADS to arm Syrian rebels seeking to depose President Bashar
al-Assad.
According to the Business Insider, the veracity of this CBS source is
questionable. Connect the dots and go back to the reason why a cover-up
of the Benghazi murders becomes crucial to the long-term goals to
destabilize the Middle East.
The US Is Openly Sending Heavy Weapons From Libya To Syrian Rebels cites the following:
The Obama administration has decided to launch a covert operation to send heavy weapons to Syrian rebels, Christina Lamb of The Sunday Times of London reports.
Diplomatic sources told the Sunday Times that the U.S. "bought weapons
from the stockpiles of Libya's former dictator Muammar Gaddafi."
The heavy arms include mortars, rocket propelled grenades, anti-tank
missiles and the controversial anti-aircraft heat-seeking SA-7 missiles,
which are integral to countering Bashar Al-Assad's bombing campaign.
Now compute the decades-old design for the territory as stated by
Wes Clark and the neocon dream. Glenn Greenwald provides further documentation in Salon that
the various Middle Eastern and North African wars were planned before 9/11:
General Wesley Clark … said the aim of this plot [to "destroy the governments in ... Iraq, ... Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran"]
was this: "They wanted us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it
upside down, make it under our control." He then recounted a
conversation he had had ten years earlier with Paul Wolfowitz — back in
1991 — in which the then-number-3-Pentagon-official, after criticizing
Bush 41 for not toppling Saddam, told Clark: "But one thing we did learn
[from the Persian Gulf War] is that we can use our military in the
region – in the Middle East – and the Soviets won’t stop us. And we’ve
got about 5 or 10 years to clean up those old Soviet regimes – Syria, Iran [sic], Iraq
– before the next great superpower comes on to challenge us." Clark
said he was shocked by Wolfowitz’s desires because, as Clark put it:
"the purpose of the military is to start wars and change governments?
It’s not to deter conflicts?"
The
diabolic union between Neoconservatives and Neoliberals produces a
litter of demonic adventures that build up the body count and push the
region into a globalist cesspit of satanic dimensions. In order to
comprehend the interconnection of conflicts it is important to
understand the deceptive war on terror and the assembled alliance with
the Al Qaeda bogeyman.
The message in the essay,
It’s Dishonest to Talk about Benghazi Without Talking About the Syrian War, is a reality that many cowardly Americans are unwilling to deal with, much less act upon.
Both parties are avoiding the bigger picture … The fact that Democrats and Republicans alike have been using Benghazi as the center of U.S. efforts to arm the Al Qaeda-affiliated Syrian rebels.
Specifically, the U.S. supported opposition which overthrew Libya’s Gadaffi was largely comprised of Al Qaeda terrorists.
According to a 2007 report
by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center’s center, the Libyan city of
Benghazi was one of Al Qaeda’s main headquarters – and bases for
sending Al Qaeda fighters into Iraq – prior to the overthrow of Gaddafi.
What possible justification is there to intervene in Syria? The
presupposed civil war is really a designed coup d'état overthrow that
only benefits a greater Israel regional expansion. Note how the policy
wonks work in their nefarious planning for destabilization. The flagship
establishment mouthpiece
Foreign Policy has the mission to signal the intentions of government stratagem as the master plans are implemented, in the article
How to destabilize the Assad regime.
In order to re-up its strategy, the administration should employ a
cross-governmental approach that enlists the Treasury, Commerce, and
Defense Departments. The Treasury Department should use sanctions to
limit Assad's ability to repatriate funds from oil exports and more
properly enforce the 2012 GRAHVITY sanctions prohibiting the transfer of
internet, communications, or surveillance technology to Syria. The
Treasury Department should also prohibit U.S. companies from doing
business with Assad's enablers by designating those entities that
continue to supply him with resources. Congress could bolster the latter
measure by requiring federal contractors to certify that they are not
in business with Assad's enablers. Congress should also prohibit foreign
financial institutions enabling Assad from doing business with U.S.
banks. Meanwhile the Commerce Department should secure tighter control
over the delivery of information and communications technology to Syria
especially through authorized foreign distributors. Finally, as mandated
by an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013, the
Pentagon should cease its business with Rosoboronexport, one of Assad's
chief enablers, instead of entering into new contracts as it has
expressed the intention to do.
What do you call the treachery, when your own government is committing the subversiveness?
The cryptic psychopolitical spook
Dr. Steve Pieczenik presents an astounding analysis that answers this question in the YouTube,
Benghazi Truth: Obama Was Running Secret Army.
His call to action is a rare and daring challenge to the military that
is worth a sober assessment if for no other reason than observing the
anxious and flabbergasted reaction from Alex Jones. The treason
committed, depends upon the nationalist loyalties of the government
agents. In this case, the evidence seems well placed that the security
apparatus is serving the wrong master.
The substance of the Benghazi duplicity and scandalous evasion of
accountability is an entrenched practice that permeates every level of
command and control. The courage of Gregory Hicks, Mark Thompson and
Eric Nordstrom is an act of legitimate patriotism seldom seen out of
Foggy Bottom. If professional State Department public servants can speak
truth to power, where are the guts of the General Military Officers? If
the Joint Chiefs of Staff is a brood of poodle puppies and lap dogs,
God Save the Republic. Dr. Pieczenik is
In Search of James Mattoon Scott. Most subservient subjects are oblivious to the
Seven Days in May
scenario. Perpetuating the myth, that civilian command preserves the
constitutional liberties of citizens, does not conform to the record of
presidential dictatorship. When state treason is codified normality, the
mere murder of four more Americans is hardly an afterthought to the
executioners of the country. Respecting commander-in-chief traitors is
an absurd national death wish.
)
