Obama to Top Brass: Will you fire on American Citizens?: http://youtu.be/kzT6X3_Bg9o via @youtube
Obama to Top Brass: Will you fire on American Citizens?
Jan 25, 2013
The Obama administration is openly escalating its campaign against private gun ownership, and shaking up the top ranks of the military command structure — but is it also preparing to make war on the American population?
Print this page.
Nobel Peace Prize Nominee: Obama Asks Military Leaders If They Will “Fire On US Citizens”
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
January 22, 2013
2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow shockingly
claims he was told by a top military veteran that the Obama
administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders is whether or
not they will obey an order to fire on U.S. citizens.
Garrow was nominated three years ago for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize and is the founder of The Pink Pagoda Girls,
an organization dedicated to rescuing baby girls from “gendercide” in
China. Garrow has been personally involved in “helping rescue more than
36,000 Chinese baby girls from death.” He is a public figure, not an
anonymous voice on the Internet, which makes his claim all the more
disturbing.
“I have just been informed by a former senior military
leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will
stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode
folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they
will fire on US citizens or not”. Those who will not are being
removed,” Garrow wrote on his Facebook page,
later following up the post by adding the man who told him is, “one of
America’s foremost military heroes,” whose goal in divulging the
information was to “sound the alarm.”
Garrow’s claim is even more explosive given that the
country is in the throes of a national debate about gun control, with
gun rights advocates keen to insist that the founders put the second
amendment in the Constitution primarily as a defense against government
tyranny.
It also follows reports on Sunday that
General James Mattis, head of the United States Central Command, “is
being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.”
Concerns over US troops being given orders to fire on
American citizens in the event of mass gun confiscation first arose in
1995 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms, California were given a survey as part of an academic project
by Navy Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the
Marines if they would, “Fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist
confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”
The survey was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by the tone of the question.
The US Military has clearly outlined innumerable civil
emergency scenarios under which troops would be authorized to fire on
U.S. citizens.
In July 2012, the process by which this could take place
was made clear in a leaked US Army Military Police training manual for
“Civil Disturbance Operations” (PDF) dating from 2006. Similar plans were also outlined in an updated manual released in 2010 entitled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations.
The 2006 document outlines how military assets will be used to “help
local and state authorities to restore and maintain law and order” in
the event of mass riots, civil unrest or a declaration of martial law.On page 20 of the manual, rules regarding the use of “deadly force” in confronting “dissidents” on American soil are made disturbingly clear with the directive that a, “Warning shot will not be fired.”
Given that second amendment advocates are now being depicted as dangerous terrorists by the federal government and local law enforcement, Garrow’s claim is sure to stoke controversy given that Americans are seeing their gun rights eviscerated while the federal government itself stockpiles billions of bullets.
Last week, Gloversville Mayor Dayton King warned that any federal gun confiscation program could lead to a “Waco-style standoff” in rural areas of America.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
West Point think tank calls "anti-federalists" a danger
Submitted by Road Runner on Wed, 01/23/2013 - 19:33
in
Via Washington Times:
A West Point think tank has issued a paper warning America about “far right” groups such as the “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”
The report issued this week by the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., is titled “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right.”
The center — part of the institution where men and women are molded into Army officers — posted the report Tuesday. It lumps limited government activists with three movements it identifies as “a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement.”
The West Point center typically focuses reports on al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists attempting to gain power in Asia, the Middle East and Africa through violence.
But its latest study turns inward and paints a broad brush of people it considers “far right.”
It says anti-federalists “espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individuals’ civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government. Extremists in the anti-federalist movement direct most their violence against the federal government and its proxies in law enforcement.”
Rest at: http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/17/west-point-cen...
Also, Michael Savage discusses this article: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AwZvX0PdzY
A West Point think tank has issued a paper warning America about “far right” groups such as the “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”
The report issued this week by the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., is titled “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right.”
The center — part of the institution where men and women are molded into Army officers — posted the report Tuesday. It lumps limited government activists with three movements it identifies as “a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement.”
The West Point center typically focuses reports on al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists attempting to gain power in Asia, the Middle East and Africa through violence.
But its latest study turns inward and paints a broad brush of people it considers “far right.”
It says anti-federalists “espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individuals’ civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government. Extremists in the anti-federalist movement direct most their violence against the federal government and its proxies in law enforcement.”
Rest at: http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/17/west-point-cen...
Also, Michael Savage discusses this article: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AwZvX0PdzY
