Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976?Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Unless you are in this field of investigative journalism, especially covering extremely sensitive subjects and potentially dangerous subjects as well, you simply cannot understand the complexities and difficulties involved with this work that I face every day.
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Alex Jones Proves Again That He Is A Creation Of The Corporate Media
By Lee Rogers
By now many people have probably heard
about or have seen the on air confrontation between CNN talk show host
Piers Morgan and radio host Alex Jones. The discussion between Morgan
and Jones if you even want to call it that largely consisted of Jones
behaving like a loud mouthed monkey as they debated the different sides
of the gun control issue. This bizarre incident like other media
spectacles that Jones has been involved in seems to be nothing more than
another staged event to further the personality cult of Alex “Jim”
Jones and to boost Morgan’s pitiful television ratings. Unfortunately,
there are many people who still believe that Jones is an honest man
promoting freedom and fighting corruption when past history clearly
shows us that this is not the case.
Simply put, Jones is a creation of the
corporate controlled media. The reach of his Austin Texas media
platform has only been made possible due to the fact that over the past
decade he has been promoted by the likes of big name media outlets such
as Fox News, CNN, ABC and countless other radio and television
platforms. Without the support of these big media platforms, there is
no way this man would be in the position that he enjoys today.
For the past few years his web sites have
been regularly linked to by Matt Drudge’s web site the Drudge Report
which reaches millions of people on a daily basis. Drudge’s connections
to the media establishment are well documented which is not surprising
considering Drudge is Jewish just like the people who run the vast
majority of these big media enterprises. Jones has even been a regular
guest on Coast to Coast AM a nightly syndicated radio broadcast for over
the past decade.
With this type of support, it is obvious
that Jones is just as phony as all the other dirt bag shills we see on
the big television news channels. Over the years there has been an
increasing number of people getting news and information from the
Internet who are no longer believing the propaganda rubbish on the big
media outlets. As a result, it became necessary to fund and support an
operation that appears to be outside of the mainstream but in reality
exists as a controlled opposition front. The Jones media operation is
exactly this and it is becoming increasingly obvious that this is the
case based off of this latest stunt on Morgan’s show and previous stunts
like the insanely ridiculous Charlie Sheen interview a short while
ago. Although many people have probably forgotten, the Sheen event
literally put Jones in the center of what was at the time, the biggest
tabloid news story in the United States. It resulted in his media
operation receiving promotion from all of the biggest news and
entertainment shows including an invite on ABC’s talk show “The View”
which is watched by millions of people.
There are countless other reasons why
this man and his operation are completely untrustworthy but let’s look
at one that is most applicable to what happened on the Morgan show. In
2010 Jones completely disrupted a pro-gun rights rally in Austin Texas
by using a megaphone to shout over people who were speaking to an
audience of second amendment advocates. The only reason why someone
would do something like this is if they are completely insane, a paid
operative, a jealous egotistical freak or all of the above. His actions
at this rally also bring into question his integrity in supporting the
second amendment as he alone managed to ruin what looked to be a
successful event promoting gun rights.
What really sucks about this recent
fiasco is the fact that if we take what Jones says at face value, he is
correct on many points about firearms and the second amendment. Several
people including a fairly large number of Jewish Congressional figures
and Jewish media whores are calling for bans on assault weapons and
other ridiculous restrictions on firearms. It is painfully obvious that
if law abiding citizens do not have the means to defend themselves than
the only people who will have weapons will be criminals and uniformed
goons representing the government. This means that crime will increase
and the government would be able to exercise authoritarian rule over its
disarmed citizens which is probably exactly what these crazy
individuals really want. Look at how the media humanizes the recent
alleged shooting events that have occurred in the United States but how
they gloss over innocent people who have been killed by overseas drone
strikes per the order of the Obama administration. It proves that the
media only humanizes a story not because they have empathy for injured
people or the loss of life but only because they have an agenda. The
current agenda at play is clearly designed to generate public support
for any number of gun control measures. The media seems particularly
interested in promoting a draconian piece of anti-gun legislation that
is being primarily pushed in the U.S. Senate by the disgusting freedom
hating Jewess Dianne Feinstein.
Unfortunately with Jones acting like a
rabid foaming at the mouth gorilla on the Morgan show it has given these
pussy gun control advocates all sorts of propaganda fodder. All they
need to do is show people the footage of the interview and there will be
many who will likely agree that if an irresponsible man like Jones is
advocating the second amendment, than perhaps gun control measures
should be reconsidered.
The bottom line though is that the whole
thing just reeks of a stunt from start to finish. Never mind the crazy
nature of the interview, but even weeks ago you can see how this was
being built up with Jones endorsing a petition to deport Morgan from the
United States. On top of that Jones would claim that after the
interview paid goons working for New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg
were making veiled threats to him and that his life was in danger. This
is comical considering he’s previously made similar claims with
supposed guys in high and tight haircuts from the U.S. Army following
him around. According to his own statements, his life has been in
danger countless times yet nothing has ever happened to him so why
should we believe him this time around? His websites would even make a
big deal out of his alleged encounter with the TSA during his travels to
New York City for the interview. Even more ridiculous is the fact that
Jones stated that his appearance on the Morgan show made a Jewish CNN
producer cry right after the interview ended. Clearly the Jones media
operation has been attempting to squeeze every last bit of attention
they can get from this by promoting these absurd stories.
Alex Jones Vs Piers Morgan On Gun Control Live On CNN: http://youtu.be/gWQPZ-taYBs via @youtube
As much as Jones should be loathed,
Morgan as a media figure should be equally as despised. Why the hell is
there some jackass Brit on a primetime CNN slot telling Americans what
policies he thinks should be implemented here? The last thing
Americans want or need is another media propagandist on television, let
alone a propagandist who isn’t even an American. Morgan’s links to the
much publicized British phone hacking scandal have been well documented
and widely reported raising serious questions about his ethics. In fact
the ethics of both Morgan and Jones are deeply in question making it
even more likely that they would collude to engage in some form of
chicanery.
To reiterate, this appears to have been
nothing more than a staged media stunt that benefitted the establishment
in every way possible. Jones made second amendment advocates look
insane, it drew massive social media attention to Morgan’s horrific news
show and now more people know who Jones is with his website being
plastered all over the media. In fact the stunt was so successful that
Alex Jones became the number one trending topic worldwide on Twitter
for over a day. If Jones was really against the establishment do you
really believe they would be giving him this much free press coverage,
let alone allow him to spend several minutes ranting about the second
amendment on a prime time cable news broadcast?
Please do not support Alex Jones or
anything related to his operation in any way. He is a creation of the
corporate controlled media and is only pretending that he has no
associations with them. He is nothing more than an actor just like Bill
O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and other stooges who wear fancy suits that talk
in front of a camera.
This is a man who once claimed that the Arabs run Hollywood despite the fact that Jewish interests dating back to the early part of the 20th century have always run Hollywood. This man is nothing more than a Judas goat leading everyone to slaughter. It is truly unfortunate that we will likely see many more of these media spectacles involving the likes of Mr. Jones as he takes his place as the new Rush Limbaugh.
This is a man who once claimed that the Arabs run Hollywood despite the fact that Jewish interests dating back to the early part of the 20th century have always run Hollywood. This man is nothing more than a Judas goat leading everyone to slaughter. It is truly unfortunate that we will likely see many more of these media spectacles involving the likes of Mr. Jones as he takes his place as the new Rush Limbaugh.
Obama Economy Hits Media: NYT, Time Announce Major Layoffs
Obama Economy Hits Media: NYT, Time Announce Major Layoffs
As many as 700 -- almost ten-percent of the overall staff -- are on the chopping block at Time Magazine. According to New York Magazine, a whole herd of top-level sacred cows at the New York Times will be given the non-choice of a buyout or a forced layoff within the next few weeks.
And in both cases, it's due to "rapidly declining advertising revenue."
Yeah, that's a shame.
This is what you call going down with the ship. Time and the NYT
are Exhibits A and B in the case to expose everything wrong and
self-defeating with today's mainstream media. Rather than do the job
honestly (which would undoubtedly improve the customer base), and wake
up to the reality that the Internet has removed the monopolistic
distribution bottleneck on the flow of information that kept them alive
for so long, both publications chose instead to double down when it came
to pushing a left-wing agenda.
It was almost as if they knew the end was coming, and this was their last chance.
But that's their choice; it's a free
country, right? And while I don't wish anyone long-term unemployment in
Obama's jobs-barren economy, that doesn't mean the karma of the
situation isn’t worth noting. The problem old media is facing with
"rapidly declining advertising revenue" isn't only due to the fact that
they "suck." It also has to do with the job performance of a failed
president they went all-in on to elect and re-elect.
Ronald Reagan proved that it is more
than possible to come roaring out of a crippling recession if the
correct economic policies are put into place. Barack Obama decided to go
the exact other way. Moreover, the media sold whatever credibility it
had left to not only give him the power to destroy any chance we had for
a real recovery, but in order to win his reelection, the media also
manufactured a new and accepted normal when it comes to what an economic
recovery actually is.
It's just a fact that if the economy
was doing better, advertising revenue would be doing better, and as a
result, fewer people at Time and the NYT would be losing their jobs today.
No matter what, though, no matter how
bad things get for them personally or for our country as a whole,
nothing will ever give these institutions the unselfish moral courage to
admit a mistake was made.
Obama judge sides with convicted US-born Taliban terrorist, grants group prayers
Obama judge sides with convicted US-born Taliban terrorist, grants group prayers
Posted on January 12, 2013 by creeping
Aiding and abetting the enemy. via US-born Taliban fighter wins prison prayer lawsuit | KVOA.com | Tucson, Arizona.
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) – A federal judge has
ruled that a convicted Taliban fighter should be allowed to pray daily
in a group with other Muslim inmates at their high-security prison in
Indiana.
U.S. District Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
sided on Friday with John Walker Lindh, an American convicted of
fighting alongside the Taliban.
Alongside? WTF kind of reporting is that?
The judge ruled that the prison was
violating Lindh’s and other Muslim inmates’ religious freedom by banning
them from engaging in daily ritual prayer.
Is the prison violating Lindh and other Muslims religious freedom
by banning violent jihad as well? How about funding terrorist groups
(aka zakat)? Keeping slaves? Marrying underage girls? Having four wives?
These are all freedoms permitted in Islam.
Lindh is serving a 20-year sentence for aiding the Taliban during the 2001 U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan.
He sued the government after he was barred
from praying with other inmates, which he said violated his religious
rights. Prison officials had argued that it would be dangerous,
unaffordable and unfair to other inmates.
Jane Magnus-StinsonPresident Obama on January 20, 2010 nominated Magnus-Stinson to the seat on the Southern District of Indiana, to replace Judge Larry J. McKinney, who took senior status on July 4, 2009.What might a convicted Muslim terrorist who clearly has chosen to double-down on his Islamic beliefs want to pray with other Muslims about? What else will they be discussing, planning, plotting?
More to come.
Sandy Hook
(NaturalNews) As of the time of this writing, if you search on Google
for the URL of the United Way Sandy Hook fundraising page (see
instructions, below), you will get a Google search result saying the
page was created on December 11, 2012.
What's so odd about that? The Sandy Hook shooting took place three days later, on December 14, 2012.
If your head is suddenly ringing with shouts of "conspiracy theory!" you're not alone. This kind of news immediately sets off red flags with most people, including myself. "Is this for REAL?" I found myself asking when I first saw this.
So I grabbed a screen shot from Google search results, and you can see that below. Yep, it shows December 11, 2012, clear as day. In fact, it has consistently shown this for the past four days.
Click here to see these search results yourself. (If you get results showing any date other than December 11, then Google has changed them.)
The parameter on the end of the search URL, by the way, is "as_qdr=y15" which tells Google to display the date the page was created.
Here's the screen shot of the results I have been consistently getting over the past several days:

As you can see, it clearly shows "December 11, 2012" as the date the page was created. The page reads:
United Way extends our most sincere condolences and prayers to all those families affected by the devastating events in Newtown / Sandy Hook...
For a full screen shot of the United Way page, click the following link:
www.naturalnews.com/images/Screenshot-Newtown.Uwwesternct.org.jpg
It's clear that this page was created to raise funds for Sandy Hook victims. Yet the Sandy Hook massacre did not occur until three days AFTER this page was created, according to Google.
I did some checking around and found that one Google engineer says the date is a "glitch." That seems odd, since Google's date property seems to be accurate for everything else I can find.
For example, I wrote a story about the mysterious death of John Noveske yesterday. If you run a Google search for it, using the date parameter, it correctly lists the exact HOUR of my publication of that page.
Click here to see the search results yourself.
So I'm not sure why Google search results would be correct about seemingly all the others pages it indexes, but somehow wrong by three days on the United Way Sandy Hook fundraising page.
The "glitch" explanation seems suspect to me. It sounds like a quick answer to try to downplay something that could be the biggest story of the year. Because if the United Way knew about the Sandy Hook massacre three days before it actually happened, then the entire thing had to have been scripted.
As the following video shows, in 2001 a BBC news reporter stood on camera and announced that the World Trade Center 7 building had collapsed even while it was still standing directly behind her!
That video, which was censored by Google Video (surprised?), can be viewed here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI
Why did the BBC make this mistake? Because just like CNN, which has a long and hilarious history of releasing totally fake news broadcasts (like THIS one from the Gulf War), the BBC was leaked the information about the WTC 7 building collapse before it happened. The news was embargoed to a specific hour, but the BBC calculated the time zone incorrectly and accidentally ran the news an hour early.
(By the way, that fake CNN Gulf War video linked above was so incredibly, laughably stupid that one of the guests being interviewed hears a biological attack siren and grabs a HELMET! Keep all this fakery in mind when you consider the credibility of people like Piers Morgan...)
This broadcast time-shift mistake sounds exactly like what happened with the United Way Sandy Hook fundraising page. Three days too early. Somebody didn't follow the embargo, it seems, and they hoped no one would notice. They didn't realize Google was spidering everything before the massacre took place.
For the record, the collapse of WTC 7 was, without question, caused by planned demolition explosives. After reviewing the actual facts of what happened, only a completely insane (or irrational) person could conclude anything other than that. No wonder more than 1,700 professional architects and engineers have gone on the record questioning the ridiculously laughable official explanation of 9/11. See their website here: http://www.ae911truth.org
9/11 was clearly staged for the purpose of passing the Patriot Act and justifying the so-called "War on Terror" that continues to this day. See where it took us? Now Obama uses the same excuse to pass the NDAA. That's what happens when all the Republicans hoo-rah their guy in the White House while not thinking ahead far enough to realize a Democrat would some day use the same false terror excuse to take away everybody's guns.
Increasingly, Sandy Hook looks like it might have been staged as well. What do you think?
Enjoy this actual CNN broadcast from the 1990's. See if you can keep from crying with total laughter by the time you get through it:
What's so odd about that? The Sandy Hook shooting took place three days later, on December 14, 2012.
If your head is suddenly ringing with shouts of "conspiracy theory!" you're not alone. This kind of news immediately sets off red flags with most people, including myself. "Is this for REAL?" I found myself asking when I first saw this.
So I grabbed a screen shot from Google search results, and you can see that below. Yep, it shows December 11, 2012, clear as day. In fact, it has consistently shown this for the past four days.
Click here to see these search results yourself. (If you get results showing any date other than December 11, then Google has changed them.)
The parameter on the end of the search URL, by the way, is "as_qdr=y15" which tells Google to display the date the page was created.
Here's the screen shot of the results I have been consistently getting over the past several days:
As you can see, it clearly shows "December 11, 2012" as the date the page was created. The page reads:
United Way extends our most sincere condolences and prayers to all those families affected by the devastating events in Newtown / Sandy Hook...
For a full screen shot of the United Way page, click the following link:
www.naturalnews.com/images/Screenshot-Newtown.Uwwesternct.org.jpg
It's clear that this page was created to raise funds for Sandy Hook victims. Yet the Sandy Hook massacre did not occur until three days AFTER this page was created, according to Google.
I did some checking around and found that one Google engineer says the date is a "glitch." That seems odd, since Google's date property seems to be accurate for everything else I can find.
For example, I wrote a story about the mysterious death of John Noveske yesterday. If you run a Google search for it, using the date parameter, it correctly lists the exact HOUR of my publication of that page.
Click here to see the search results yourself.
So I'm not sure why Google search results would be correct about seemingly all the others pages it indexes, but somehow wrong by three days on the United Way Sandy Hook fundraising page.
The "glitch" explanation seems suspect to me. It sounds like a quick answer to try to downplay something that could be the biggest story of the year. Because if the United Way knew about the Sandy Hook massacre three days before it actually happened, then the entire thing had to have been scripted.
WTC 7 building was announced "destroyed" while it was still standing!
Historically speaking, this is all very relevant because we've seen this before with 9/11.As the following video shows, in 2001 a BBC news reporter stood on camera and announced that the World Trade Center 7 building had collapsed even while it was still standing directly behind her!
That video, which was censored by Google Video (surprised?), can be viewed here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI
Why did the BBC make this mistake? Because just like CNN, which has a long and hilarious history of releasing totally fake news broadcasts (like THIS one from the Gulf War), the BBC was leaked the information about the WTC 7 building collapse before it happened. The news was embargoed to a specific hour, but the BBC calculated the time zone incorrectly and accidentally ran the news an hour early.
(By the way, that fake CNN Gulf War video linked above was so incredibly, laughably stupid that one of the guests being interviewed hears a biological attack siren and grabs a HELMET! Keep all this fakery in mind when you consider the credibility of people like Piers Morgan...)
This broadcast time-shift mistake sounds exactly like what happened with the United Way Sandy Hook fundraising page. Three days too early. Somebody didn't follow the embargo, it seems, and they hoped no one would notice. They didn't realize Google was spidering everything before the massacre took place.
For the record, the collapse of WTC 7 was, without question, caused by planned demolition explosives. After reviewing the actual facts of what happened, only a completely insane (or irrational) person could conclude anything other than that. No wonder more than 1,700 professional architects and engineers have gone on the record questioning the ridiculously laughable official explanation of 9/11. See their website here: http://www.ae911truth.org
9/11 was clearly staged for the purpose of passing the Patriot Act and justifying the so-called "War on Terror" that continues to this day. See where it took us? Now Obama uses the same excuse to pass the NDAA. That's what happens when all the Republicans hoo-rah their guy in the White House while not thinking ahead far enough to realize a Democrat would some day use the same false terror excuse to take away everybody's guns.
Increasingly, Sandy Hook looks like it might have been staged as well. What do you think?
Enjoy this actual CNN broadcast from the 1990's. See if you can keep from crying with total laughter by the time you get through it:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)