Valerie “Jezebele” Jarrett Targets Hobby Lobby As A Corporate Entity Trying To Seize A Controlling Interest over Women’s Health

• Saturday, 30 November 2013 11:45
• Written by: Jake Baker
• Leave a reply

• permalink
• Tagged under:
  Children, Hobby Lobby, murder, Obama, Valerie "Jezebele" Jarrett, Women's Health
• Dr. Jake Baker http://Right180.com

By: Fred Lucas

White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett called out Hobby Lobby and insisted the Obamacare mandate case that will go before the Supreme Court is about whether big corporations can restrict women from having access to birth control.

“No corporate entity should be in position to limit women’s legal access to care, or to seize a controlling interest over the health care choices of women,” Jarrett wrote on the White House blog. “To take that type of power away from individuals, and to let the personal beliefs of a woman’s boss dictate her health care choices would constitute a major step backward for women’s health and self-determination.”

The case is actually a religious freedom complaint against the administration for the Health and Human Services mandate requiring insurance to provide free coverage of abortion-inducing drugs, contraception and sterilization. If the plaintiffs win, it would not allow them to restrict employees from buying these products on their own, only that the employees would not get them for free.

The high court will hear the case from two family-owned companies, the Oklahoma-based chain Hobby Lobby and the Pennsylvania-based Conestoga Wood Specialties Store Corp., both of which argue that paying for employee-based coverage of these drug violates their religious freedom.

“Today, there are people trying to take this right away from women, by letting private, for-profit corporations and employers make medical decisions for their employees, based on their personal beliefs,” said Jarrett, whose blog was cross-posted on the Huffington Post.

Jarrett predicted victory in the high court, and called out just one of the plaintiffs.

“Among the first cases to reach the Supreme Court is one filed by Hobby Lobby, an arts and crafts chain whose owners want to be able to take the option for birth control benefits away from their employees,” Jarrett said.

Ed Note: Apparently anyone who doesn’t want to murder children with Ms Jarrett is a corporate entity trying to “Seize A Controlling Interest over Women’s Health.” That’s the euphemism they are using now for murdering babies.  They call it “women’s health”  That of course is an oxymoron because women who have abortions have many more health problems both physical and mental than women who don’t.  Women who have abortions also have a much higher substance abuse (both alcohol and drug) problem than women who don’t murder their children.  

The two litigants in the case are not trying to restrict anyone’s freedom, said Sarah Torre, policy analyst for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

“This is an interesting argument from the administration that pushed a health care law that severely restrictions the ability for Americans to choose health care that aligns with the value of their family and restricting companies that could be creating jobs,” Torre told TheBlaze. “Obamacare is about restricting choices.”

“No one is suggesting a ban on anything,” Torre continued. “This is about family businesses – the Green family and the Hahns family – about their freedom to continue to create jobs while respecting their values.”

The Green family is the owner of Hobby Lobby. The Hahns family owns Conestoga Wood. Lower courts split on the decision, ruling in favor of the Green family and against the Hahns family.

British National Archives show a son was born to Obama Sr. in 1961 in Kenya

Posted by Dr. Eowyn

British National Archives show a son was born to Obama Sr. in 1961 in Kenya

The British National Archives (BNA) is an executive agency of the government of the United Kingdom. Based in Kew in southwest London, the BNA is the UK government’s official archive, containing 1,000 years of history from Domesday Book to the present, with records from parchment and paper scrolls to digital files and archived websites, including Foreign Office and Colonial Office correspondence and files. The collections held by the BNA can be searched using their online catalogue. Entrance to the Archives is free.
On April 18, 2012, the BNA released the first batch of thousands of “lost” colonial-era files believed to have been destroyed, including files on Britain’s former colony of Kenya. Reporters at the UK’s The Guardian were among the first who looked at some of the newly released colonial files. They found that the name of Barack Obama (henceforth, Obama Sr.), the father of the POS in the White House, is on the top of a list of names revealed in a hitherto secret British colonial file of Kenyans studying in the United States.
But it’s not just UK journalists who can access the British National Archives; anyone can. In May 2012, someone conducted a search of the Archives using the search term “Obama” and found that an unnamed son of Obama Sr. was born in Kenya in 1961. Since the POS in the White House is the only known son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before 1963 when Kenya became officially independent from the UK, it is reasonable for us to conclude that the POS is that unnamed son of Obama Sr. born in Kenya in 1961. And in fact, the claimed birth date of the POS is August 4, 1961.

Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (l); Stanley Ann Dunham (r).

BELOW ARE EXCERPTS FROM DAN CROSBY’S ON-SITE REPORT FROM KEW FOR THE DAILY PEN, “OBAMA’S KENYA BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES,” JULY 18, 2012:

Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives. [...]
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya.  Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly.  Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials asthe Obama administration has coincidentally paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.
Also, the presence of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington.  Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent high school graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961).
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama [Sr.] are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA.  The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961.  Barack Obama [Sr.] is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).
The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender.  However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives.  According to researchers, Obama [Sr.]’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books.  Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama [Sr.] birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.
However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf
Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009.  African news agency expressed surprise at Clinton’s arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.
For someone who wanted to remain in America, it’s difficult to imagine any reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…
The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed in the very same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn’t “get the memo” that he was a daddy.

On August 31st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder neglected to name his newborn son on an application for extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S.
Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.
Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real Father” presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” which was posted to the internet by the administration in April of 2011. The document image has since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software.
[...], in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital records history thatbirth certificates are often amended after the birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the child.
In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571. [...] Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the biological father. This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery. Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by authorized persons under Hawaiian law.
[...] If Obama [Sr.] is not the biological father, or if paternal information is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama’s eligibility. Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in American history. Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a revelation would cause.
[...] Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S. There is no evidence or testimony that Obama [Sr.] ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been engaged. The two did not live together before or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with the State of Hawaii.
Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However, images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of Dunham’s child.  A review of the court documents shows that at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.
Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S. However, no marriage license application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama [Sr.] had even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham. This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama’s relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the birth of her child.
[...] Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama’s alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaiiin the course of their duties to verify his eligibility. The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of presidentwhen he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the commission.
[...] Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.
[...] Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother’s claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census figures. [...] The impact of population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and agency resources was very significant in 1961.  The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. [...]

UPDATE (Aug. 25, 2012):

According to Dan Crosby, the specific sources of information pertaining to births of Kenyan nationals under British jurisdiction can be researched in the following BNA files (Courtesy: British National Archives):

General Register Office SERIES RG36 Registers and Returns of Births, Marriages and Deaths in the Protectorates etc of Africa and Asia

Legal status:    Public Record(s)

Language:    English

Creator names:    General Register Office, 1836-1970

Covering Birth Registration dates:    1895-1965

Physical description:    15 volume(s)

Access conditions:    Available in microform only

Held by:    The National Archives, Kew

Scope and content:    Notifications forwarded by officials responsible for civil registration under administrative ordinances in Nyasaland, Kenya, Somaliland, Uganda, Sudan, Palestine, Sarawak, Malaya, including Johore and Selangor, and British North Borneo, commencing at varying dates.

Publication note:    Geoffrey Yeo ‘The British Overseas, A Guide to Records of Their Births, Baptisms, Marriages, Deaths and Burials Available in the United Kingdom’, London, 2nd edn, 1988.

Related material:    Some earlier returns from the East African territories in the period during which they were under Foreign Office control are in the consular registers retained in the custody of the registrar general.

Place:    Kenya, Africa (Territory Thereof): 1920 – 1963

Subjects:    Birth: registration

H/t Obama Release Your Records

~Eowyn
Dr. Eowyn is a regular contributor to The D.C. Clothesline and the Editor of Fellowship of the Minds. This article originally appeared on FOTM in August of 2012 but I thought our readers may appreciate it. -Dean Garrison

Foreign Policy Indictment of Obama: Incompetence On Parade

Foreign Policy Indictment of Obama: Incompetence On Parade

by 05) Andrew Amedee on October 20, 2012

From apologizing to Kandahar for his policy leading to the green-on-blue murder of US troops, to the turmoil surrounding Benghazi, Barack Obama’s incompetence regarding foreign policy is deadly. This may sound like a hyperbolic indictment, but consider the facts:

Under the reign of President Obama, US casualties in Afghanistan are up to approximately 1350 in just 3 ½ years. From October 7, 2001 to January 20^th 2009, the death toll of U.S. troop in Afghanistan was 630. In less than half the time, this supposed Commander in Chief has more than doubled the body count of Marines, Sailors, Soldiers, and Airmen. The same could be said about the debt, but that’s another article.

Why so many? Three words: Rules Of Engagement (ROE).

It is the policy of the Obama administration that if a combatant temporarily puts down his weapon, US troops may not engage & must cease fire. So, after unloading a 30 round magazine at our soldiers, the terrorist can put down his weapon, reload another magazine and if our military fires in the interim, our soldiers can go to Leavenworth for the rest of their lives. One might be left in awe at this shockingly incompetent Obama policy. Major General Robert Scales has been an outspoken critic of this inept administration & its policies for warfare, which has only led to more dead US troops.

Furthermore, our soldiers cannot hold captured terrorist for interrogation past 96 hours and must turn them over to Afghanistan police. This is not a joke. Consider the ‘green on blue’ attacks to decide if this incompetent Obama policy is wise.

Finally, Barack Obama has tied the hands of the US military with his rule that no US soldier is allowed to kill the enemy without prior approval from an Afghan-national. Again, consider the ‘green on blue’ murders, and one can only conclude that this ROE is—not only incompetent—but also the way to lose a war. The rules for prosecuting and governing ‘Obama’s War’ are the rules of political correctness & appeasement.

This next part will absolutely infuriate you, especially if you are serving or have served in the United States Military.

Lance Corporal Greg Buckley Jr. was serving honorably in the Helmand Province.  The 21 year old Marine was training local security forces (“green soldiers”) as part of Obama’s planned 2014 draw-down. Routinely facing the threat of mortar shelling, gunfire, and IEDs by terrorist—LCpl Buckley did his job and did his job well in the face of enormous adversity.

One of the 7^th Century barbarians who LCpl Buckley was valiantly attempting to train routinely told the Marine, “We don’t want you here. We don’t need you here.” Finally, after confronting the thinly veiled terrorist for his comments, LCpl Buckley was, of course, made to apologize. But the trainee refused to shake the Marine’s hand.

Much like Sean Smith, LCpl Buckley predicted his death, informing his family that he would be murdered by the trainee. Prophetically, the Marine was right. The barbarian crept into his room, and gunned down the Marine in his sleep—shooting LCpl Buckley multiple times in the chest with an AK-47, killing him.

This happened two days before he was scheduled to leave Afghanistan.

Greg Buckley Sr. and his wife Marina—the parents of the slain Marine—were sent a form-letter from the Commander in Chief. The families of the SeAL Team 6 members who died in a widely publicized helicopter crash got the same sort of shabby treatment. This is the same SeAL Team 6 that operated in secret for more than 30 years, until the buffoon Vice President, Joe Biden, admitted their existence. The same SeAL Team which Obama now uses to prop-up his political campaign, when declaring “I killed bin Laden. I ended the war in Iraq. I am ending the war in Afghanistan.”

For one who never served, Barack sure likes to take credit for US MILITARY accomplishment & achievement.  As a side note, Barack Obama did send the family of Heavy D a personalized, hand written letter when the rapper passed away. The sheer sacrifice it must have taken Obama to write that letter must leave so many in shock & awe.

It should be clear to all that Obama only likes to use the military as stage props, and certainly does not have their safety at heart. When Obama speaks at West Point or Annapolis, he often takes credit of operations he had little to do with. Other than that, he and his wife have very little use for the military, or the institutions they represent.

See: “All this for a damn flag?” (Article continues after the video)

There is no plan for victory under this President. In fact, Obama is trying to redefine “victory.” Under Obama, Afghanistan has degenerated into a losing exercise in humiliation. Like Obama’s plan to homosexualize the military, this 1960s-style-radical is trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, as the radical left did 40 years ago when protesting America in favor of Communist North Vietnam.

Benghazi is an equally troubling recent development. Or is it that recent?

We now know through the House Oversight Committee chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) that over 100 documents from Ambassador Chris Stevens expressing concern over the growing Al Qaeda presence in the area were submitted to the administration in the months leading up to the attack. Nothing was done. Why?

In fact, during the Vice Presidential debate, Joe Biden said, “the administration wasn’t even told.” The Consulate didn’t have even the standard Marine security detail, much less any reinforcements. Why?

For over two weeks the administration blamed a YouTube video made by an Egyptian born Coptic Christian, that no one ever saw. The Obama Administration kept saying it was a spontaneous protest that got out of hand. Why? Obama most likely blames youtube on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood, who used to be a on terrorist watch list and have now been welcomed into power by Obama.

In the recent Presidential debate, Obama tried to ham-handedly claim that he labeled it a terrorist attack from the beginning. Let’s accept that premise momentarily. Why then, did his Ambassador to the U.N. go on no less than 5 Sunday talk shows and blame the video? From Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton to Joe Biden to Susan Rice to Jay Carney, they all claimed the video was behind this attack. Why? Why was it that Barack Obama after hearing about the attack, went directly to….sleep? He then got on a plane the next morning for a Las Vegas fundraiser.

Parents reading this article, if your child was missing and under attack, would you consider it “not optimal,” shrug it off and  just go to sleep? Why are there so many provable lies about an obvious terrorist attack?

Could this have been a kidnapping gone wrong? Recently, Pat Smith appeared on Fox News & stated that her son was a target. Unlike the others, Sean Smith was “thrown into a pick-up truck and taken from the site.”

It might explain why Barack Obama didn’t feel it necessary to ask any questions before going nighty-night on 9/11—he may have already known the answers. There’s only one problem, two former Navy SeALs were there and they weren’t part of the plan. They fought back; they did their job. They were allowed to be armed, unlike our US guards at the Embassy in Benghazi.  And this would be when things went sideways and 4 Americans lost their lives.

If you believe the multitude of the reports out there, the Obama Administration is in secret talks with the Muslim Brotherhood to release The Blind Sheik (NY Times): Omar Abdel-Rahman, the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Knowing he would go down in history with Ford for pardoning Richard Nixon, and Clinton for pardoning Marc Rich, Barack Obama might want political cover for pardoning a terrorist that we have in hand.

What better way selling the American people on the release of a World Trade Center terrorist, than a trade for our Ambassador? Of course, all of this is conjecture, but how many things has this lawless-administration done against the will of the people? At some point, conjecture and speculation have to give way to common sense and reason. Only the disinfectant of daylight and investigation will tell the tale.

by 05) Andrew Amedee on October 20, 2012

From apologizing to Kandahar for his policy leading to the green-on-blue murder of US troops, to the turmoil surrounding Benghazi, Barack Obama’s incompetence regarding foreign policy is deadly. This may sound like a hyperbolic indictment, but consider the facts:

Under the reign of President Obama, US casualties in Afghanistan are up to approximately 1350 in just 3 ½ years. From October 7, 2001 to January 20^th 2009, the death toll of U.S. troop in Afghanistan was 630. In less than half the time, this supposed Commander in Chief has more than doubled the body count of Marines, Sailors, Soldiers, and Airmen. The same could be said about the debt, but that’s another article.

Why so many? Three words: Rules Of Engagement (ROE).

It is the policy of the Obama administration that if a combatant temporarily puts down his weapon, US troops may not engage & must cease fire. So, after unloading a 30 round magazine at our soldiers, the terrorist can put down his weapon, reload another magazine and if our military fires in the interim, our soldiers can go to Leavenworth for the rest of their lives. One might be left in awe at this shockingly incompetent Obama policy. Major General Robert Scales has been an outspoken critic of this inept administration & its policies for warfare, which has only led to more dead US troops.

Furthermore, our soldiers cannot hold captured terrorist for interrogation past 96 hours and must turn them over to Afghanistan police. This is not a joke. Consider the ‘green on blue’ attacks to decide if this incompetent Obama policy is wise.

Finally, Barack Obama has tied the hands of the US military with his rule that no US soldier is allowed to kill the enemy without prior approval from an Afghan-national. Again, consider the ‘green on blue’ murders, and one can only conclude that this ROE is—not only incompetent—but also the way to lose a war. The rules for prosecuting and governing ‘Obama’s War’ are the rules of political correctness & appeasement.

This next part will absolutely infuriate you, especially if you are serving or have served in the United States Military.

Lance Corporal Greg Buckley Jr. was serving honorably in the Helmand Province.  The 21 year old Marine was training local security forces (“green soldiers”) as part of Obama’s planned 2014 draw-down. Routinely facing the threat of mortar shelling, gunfire, and IEDs by terrorist—LCpl Buckley did his job and did his job well in the face of enormous adversity.

One of the 7^th Century barbarians who LCpl Buckley was valiantly attempting to train routinely told the Marine, “We don’t want you here. We don’t need you here.” Finally, after confronting the thinly veiled terrorist for his comments, LCpl Buckley was, of course, made to apologize. But the trainee refused to shake the Marine’s hand.

Much like Sean Smith, LCpl Buckley predicted his death, informing his family that he would be murdered by the trainee. Prophetically, the Marine was right. The barbarian crept into his room, and gunned down the Marine in his sleep—shooting LCpl Buckley multiple times in the chest with an AK-47, killing him.

This happened two days before he was scheduled to leave Afghanistan.

Greg Buckley Sr. and his wife Marina—the parents of the slain Marine—were sent a form-letter from the Commander in Chief. The families of the SeAL Team 6 members who died in a widely publicized helicopter crash got the same sort of shabby treatment. This is the same SeAL Team 6 that operated in secret for more than 30 years, until the buffoon Vice President, Joe Biden, admitted their existence. The same SeAL Team which Obama now uses to prop-up his political campaign, when declaring “I killed bin Laden. I ended the war in Iraq. I am ending the war in Afghanistan.”

For one who never served, Barack sure likes to take credit for US MILITARY accomplishment & achievement.  As a side note, Barack Obama did send the family of Heavy D a personalized, hand written letter when the rapper passed away. The sheer sacrifice it must have taken Obama to write that letter must leave so many in shock & awe.

It should be clear to all that Obama only likes to use the military as stage props, and certainly does not have their safety at heart. When Obama speaks at West Point or Annapolis, he often takes credit of operations he had little to do with. Other than that, he and his wife have very little use for the military, or the institutions they represent.

See: “All this for a damn flag?” (Article continues after the video)

There is no plan for victory under this President. In fact, Obama is trying to redefine “victory.” Under Obama, Afghanistan has degenerated into a losing exercise in humiliation. Like Obama’s plan to homosexualize the military, this 1960s-style-radical is trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, as the radical left did 40 years ago when protesting America in favor of Communist North Vietnam.

Benghazi is an equally troubling recent development. Or is it that recent?

We now know through the House Oversight Committee chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) that over 100 documents from Ambassador Chris Stevens expressing concern over the growing Al Qaeda presence in the area were submitted to the administration in the months leading up to the attack. Nothing was done. Why?

In fact, during the Vice Presidential debate, Joe Biden said, “the administration wasn’t even told.” The Consulate didn’t have even the standard Marine security detail, much less any reinforcements. Why?

For over two weeks the administration blamed a YouTube video made by an Egyptian born Coptic Christian, that no one ever saw. The Obama Administration kept saying it was a spontaneous protest that got out of hand. Why? Obama most likely blames youtube on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood, who used to be a on terrorist watch list and have now been welcomed into power by Obama.

In the recent Presidential debate, Obama tried to ham-handedly claim that he labeled it a terrorist attack from the beginning. Let’s accept that premise momentarily. Why then, did his Ambassador to the U.N. go on no less than 5 Sunday talk shows and blame the video? From Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton to Joe Biden to Susan Rice to Jay Carney, they all claimed the video was behind this attack. Why? Why was it that Barack Obama after hearing about the attack, went directly to….sleep? He then got on a plane the next morning for a Las Vegas fundraiser.

Parents reading this article, if your child was missing and under attack, would you consider it “not optimal,” shrug it off and  just go to sleep? Why are there so many provable lies about an obvious terrorist attack?

Could this have been a kidnapping gone wrong? Recently, Pat Smith appeared on Fox News & stated that her son was a target. Unlike the others, Sean Smith was “thrown into a pick-up truck and taken from the site.”

It might explain why Barack Obama didn’t feel it necessary to ask any questions before going nighty-night on 9/11—he may have already known the answers. There’s only one problem, two former Navy SeALs were there and they weren’t part of the plan. They fought back; they did their job. They were allowed to be armed, unlike our US guards at the Embassy in Benghazi.  And this would be when things went sideways and 4 Americans lost their lives.

If you believe the multitude of the reports out there, the Obama Administration is in secret talks with the Muslim Brotherhood to release The Blind Sheik (NY Times): Omar Abdel-Rahman, the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Knowing he would go down in history with Ford for pardoning Richard Nixon, and Clinton for pardoning Marc Rich, Barack Obama might want political cover for pardoning a terrorist that we have in hand.

What better way selling the American people on the release of a World Trade Center terrorist, than a trade for our Ambassador? Of course, all of this is conjecture, but how many things has this lawless-administration done against the will of the people? At some point, conjecture and speculation have to give way to common sense and reason. Only the disinfectant of daylight and investigation will tell the tale.

Washington released Iranian assets of 8 billion dollars .. Kuwait welcomed: We hope it is a successful start to a permanent agreement defuse tension and preserve the region's security and stability

Agreement «nuclear» between Iran and the major powers .. The difference in interpretations Monday, November 25th, 2013 Capitals Agencies

Add your comment : Font size

Foreign Minister Catherine Ashton, the European Union foreign ministers mediating America, Russia, Germany, China, France, Britain and Iran announced a moment of the nuclear agreement in Geneva yesterday (Reuters) Khamenei: success .. Obama: We will not impose new sanctions on Tehran .. Lavrov: There is no loser .. And Holland: an important step in the right direction It seems that ten years of political confrontation and sanctions may be nearing an end, with the announcement of the six major powers and Iran to reach an agreement first «historic» to contain Iran's nuclear program of Geneva, despite the fact that those who support it saw as «first step» has been overcome. The agreement provides for Tehran to accept the extradition of uranium enriched up to 20% and sufficiency enrichment does not exceed 5% compared to ease economic sanctions imposed on it, Paving the way for a new period of in-depth negotiations for six months. While the description of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, agreed that «success», considered U.S. President Barack Obama that «an important first step», and welcomed by most Western countries and Iran's allies in Moscow and Damascus. However, the Interceptor was the fiercest of Israel, which confirmed that this «historical error» Does not care and do not prevent them from their right to self-defense. And in the Gulf, said the Emirates News Agency «The United Arab Emirates welcomed the agreement», as Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Saudi Shura Council Abdullah, the military said yesterday that «sleep Sajavi population of the Middle East region after the nuclear agreement», referring to the absence of great satisfaction that prevails countries in the region. In a related development expressed and Foreign Ministry Undersecretary Khaled Al-Jarallah from Kuwait welcome this agreement which was reached between the major powers and Iran. He also expressed Jarallah told the «KUNA» the hope that this agreement constitutes a successful start to a permanent agreement defuse tension and preserve the region's security and stability. Jarallah concluded his statement by emphasizing the importance of the commitment to be achieved by this agreement in order to achieve the goals and objectives desired. Despite the satisfaction generated by the agreement, each side interpreted as a victory for him and his positions, where Iranian President Hassan Rohani that «in the agreement, was to accept the right to enrich uranium on Iranian soil,» in exchange for confirmation of U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry that the agreement «does not provide Iran's right to enrich uranium, whatever came in some of the comments ». In the immediate effects of the agreement, it was announced the former president of the Iranian Chamber of Commerce, the pure Khamoshi, yesterday for the release of $ 8 billion of Iranian assets frozen by the United States. In more detail, and after days of difficult negotiations, said major powers and Iran to reach a historic agreement the first to contain Iran's nuclear program in Geneva holds out the hope of the crisis has been going on for more than ten years, with an emphasis that he «first step» has been overcome. This agreement accepting the Islamic Republic curb its nuclear program in return ease economic sanctions imposed on it, paving the way for a new period of in-depth negotiations for six months. While the description of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, agreed that «success», said U.S. President Barack Obama said he «important first step», denounced Israel's agreement in asserting its right to self-defense, arguing that the agreement «historic mistake». Ambiguity and different interpretations Experts believe that this agreement constitutes a progress because it provides a larger package of restrictions and investigations about Iran's nuclear program, although it leaves some ambiguity that allows different interpretations around him. So said President Hassan Rohani, in a speech broadcast on state television «in the agreement, was to accept the right of uranium enrichment on Iranian soil .. The structure of the sanctions began to crack ». He said the Iranian president «each party its own interpretation, but Iran's right to enrichment is clearly stated in the text». He said «I say to the nation that the enrichment activities will continue as in the past at Natanz and Isfahan and Fordow». But U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry expressed a different position, saying that the agreement «does not provide for Iran's right to enrich uranium, whatever came in some of the comments». This was followed by Minister of Foreign Affairs European Union Catherine Ashton announced the agreement at dawn yesterday, surrounded by all the ministers who participated in the negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program, at the UN headquarters in Geneva issued a joint statement announcing reach an «agreement on a plan of action», said Ashton «We have reached an agreement on Action Plan », and to its side and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. And then shook hands, and the foreign ministers of the 5 +1 group (the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany) with Zarif congratulations for the agreement. He said Iran's foreign minister said the agreement that was reached in Geneva «important result but it is only a first step». Zarif said in a press conference «We have created a joint committee to monitor the implementation of our agreement. I hope that the two sides can progress in a way that allows re-confidence ». He added Zarif told reporters that the agreement includes «a clear signal that the enrichment will continue» in Iran, an issue that has long considered the main stumbling block in the negotiations. An important first step In reaction, the U.S. president was considered that the agreement represents «an important first step», at the same time pointing to the continued existence of «huge difficulties» in this file. Obama said the agreement «close clearest way» in front of Tehran to build a nuclear bomb, once again invite the Congress not to vote on new sanctions on Iran. He said the U.S. president that «the United States next to her friends and allies agreed to exemptions modest Iran, while continuing to apply the most our sanctions», but added that it will not impose new sanctions on Iran and will allow the Iranian government «to get part of the revenue that has been denied by the sanctions, but the structure broader sanctions will remain as it is and we will continue to vigorously implement ». From his part, the American Secretary of State, John Kerry, said the agreement «will make the world safer, and Israel and our partners in the region safer». Kerry said that the agreement signed with Iran in Geneva is a «first step». For his part, welcomed Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the agreement «There is no loser, All winners». He said Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Wei said in a statement that «the agreement will contribute to maintaining the system of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and international preserves the peace and stability in the Middle East». In Paris, French President Francois Hollande that «the preliminary agreement, which was adopted is an important step in the right direction and stage towards stopping the Iranian nuclear military program and thus towards the normalization of relations with Iran». On the other hand, Israel has denounced the agreement, saying that Tehran got «what they want», and reiterated its right to self-defense. He described the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's agreement as a «historic mistake». A statement issued by the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, hours after the conclusion of the agreement «It's a bad deal offers to Iran what it wanted: to raise part of the sanctions and to retain the essential part of its nuclear program». He said the Minister of Economy Naftali Bennett from his part that Israel is not bound by the Geneva agreement and its right to defend itself. Bennett said the leader of the Jewish Home Party, the far-right near the settler lobby that «Israel is not bound by the Geneva agreement. Iran is threatening Israel and the right of Israel to defend itself ». $ 8 billion In the first step taken after the agreement, it was announced the former president of the Iranian Chamber of Commerce, the pure Khamoshi, yesterday for the release of $ 8 billion of Iranian assets frozen by the United States. He Khamoshi, told the Iranian news (IRNA) that Washington released yesterday from eight billion dollars of assets frozen Tehran. Saudi Shura Council: Sleep Sajavi region UAE welcomes nuclear deal She Emirates News Agency that the United Arab Emirates yesterday welcomed Iran's nuclear agreement with world powers to curb Tehran's nuclear program. She added that the government hopes that the agreement represents a step toward a permanent agreement maintains the stability of the region and protects it from the tension and the risk of nuclear proliferation. For his part, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Saudi Shura Council yesterday that sleep Sajavi population of the Middle East region after the nuclear deal between Iran and world powers in reference to the state of extreme discomfort, which dominates the Gulf states because of He said the military head of the Saudi Shura Council that he had no knowledge of his government's official response, but was worried personally. The «I fear that Iran would give up something (in its nuclear program) to get something else from the major powers at the level of regional politics. I am concerned about providing more space for Iran or the launch of her hand more in the region ». He said the military «proved Iran's government month after month to have an ugly agenda in the region and in this regard will not sleep in a region assumes that things are going smoothly». He said the military «people of the region know the policies of Iran and Iran's ambitions. Know that Iran would intervene in the policy of many countries in the region ». Syria welcomes the agreement and considers it «historic» Welcomed the Syrian Foreign Ministry, yesterday, the agreement between Iran and the 5 +1 group and considered evidence that the political solutions to crises in the region is the best way to ensure security and stability. A source at the Syrian Foreign Ministry to Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) that Damascus welcomes the agreement reached in Geneva between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the 5 +1 countries and considers it a landmark agreement ensures that the interests of the Iranian people, brother and recognizes its right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. He added that Syria believes that this agreement is evidence that political solutions to crises in the region is the best way to ensure security and stability in the region away from outside interference and threat of use of force. He pointed out that Syria congratulates the people of Iran and the brother of his wise leadership on this historic achievement, which reaffirms the important role of Iran in the security and stability of the region. U.S. official: secret bilateral talks between Washington and Tehran since the summer A senior American official said after the signing of an interim agreement with Tehran over its nuclear program in Geneva yesterday, that the bilateral talks have taken place since the summer between the United States and Iran, but it remained a secret until now. He said the official on condition of anonymity «We had a small number of bilateral talks with the Iranians after the election of President Hassan Rohani in June. And confirms this information exposed on Tuesday evening Website specialist on the Middle East «the - Monitor». The official said these meetings, which are added to the contacts over the phone and messages between the spiritual and his U.S. counterpart Barack Obama, as well as direct talks between the foreign ministers of the two countries, Mohammad Javad Zarif, and John Kerry since September, was not intended to cut the road in front of the 5 +1 group, which includes five states permanent members of the UN Security Council (United States, Russia, France, Britain and China) as well as Germany. He said «that the U.S. has always said clearly that the 5 +1 group is the appropriate channel for negotiations with Iran in order to reach an agreement on the nuclear issue», describing talks with Tehran as «limited». The «that any bilateral talks we had with the Iranians was intended to promote negotiations within the 5 +1 group». Gulf states fear Iran's growing role in the region after the nuclear deal Gulf states that feel betrayed about Washington, fearful of the growing role of Iran in the region after reaching an agreement on its nuclear program with world powers, even if it is in principle in favor of the existence of good neighborly relations with Tehran. And not be afraid never Gulf states in the past Reptha about Iranian ambitions in the region, not just nuclear. He said Saudi political analyst Jamal Khashoggi, «I think that the Gulf states, in principle, want to have good relations with Iran». According to Khashoggi, the «agreement (in Geneva) eliminates the concern about the nuclear file, but it does not include other issues, which he shortened the contentious issues in the nuclear». Khashoggi stressed that «the fundamental problem for the countries of the Gulf is Iran's interference in the affairs of the region». But as long as the Gulf States denounced Iran's interference in several countries in the region, notably Syria, where Tehran supports the regime of President Bashar al-Assad, as well as Lebanon, Bahrain, Iraq and others. According to the analyst, Saudi, the Gulf states «fears that Iran agreed to explain that he leaves her the upper hand in the region». He Khashoggi «Iran abandoned its nuclear project and gained dominance». This agreement comes to be added to a series of setbacks in the U.S. Gulf relations, against the backdrop of the Arab Spring and Iranian influence and the situation in Iraq and other files. Khashoggi said «that the Americans no longer care about the issues (in the region) consider local». He said that «Israel's position is different, For it is the nuclear problem». For his part, said Saudi analyst Anwar Eshki that «for the Gulf states, the agreement is not a negative but not enough». And in turn also considered that the problem with Iran for the countries of the Gulf transcends by far the nuclear project. The passion that the lifting of sanctions on Iran will provide strong financial returns. He said in this context «lifting of sanctions raises the question: Where would put Iran this money? In the service of its people or the financing of regional crises? ». But Emirati analyst Abdul Khaliq Abdullah expressed optimism about the agreement, saying that the Gulf countries may benefit greatly in the end of the agreement. Abdullah said «a good deal, and the Gulf states do not have the confidence of the United States, but the agreement is between the international community and Iran and not between the United States and Iran, and therefore they could trust the Gulf states to this agreement». Abdullah acknowledged the existence of «Gulf fear of the Obama administration, which is driven by more than it should be toward Iran». But stability that may result from the agreement could make the Gulf states «the biggest beneficiary of the agreement». Iran currency jump more than 3% after nuclear deal Iranian currency jumped more than 3% against the U.S. dollar yesterday after the news to reach agreement on Tehran's nuclear program, which boosted hopes that the recovering economy, which is suffering as a result of international sanctions. Traders said that the Iranian currency recorded about 29 thousand riyals to the dollar on the free market in Tehran, compared with about 30 thousand before the agreement reached by diplomats in Geneva in the early hours of yesterday. Said Nariman Avlana A trader at a group. AFP. Aye, a civil engineering firm Iranian phone «feel the positive sentiment inside Iran». It uses the official exchange rate announced by the Central Bank of Iran by some quasi-governmental companies that gain preferential treatment in obtaining dollar has settled yesterday at 24 thousand and 822 riyals to the dollar. The most important terms of the agreement with Iran What abide by Iran * Committed Iran to halt enrichment beyond 5% and the dismantling of connections required technical enrichment beyond this figure. * Iran has committed to neutralize its stockpile of enriched uranium by nearly 20% and reduce its stockpile of enriched uranium complete by around 20% to below 5%, or convert it to an image does not fit any other enrichment before the end of the first phase. * Committed Iran to halt any progress in the enrichment capabilities through: Do not install any additional centrifuges of any kind, do not install or use any of the devices next generation of centrifuges to enrich uranium, disabled about half of the centrifuges installed at Natanz and three-quarters of centrifuges in Fordow so can not be used in the enrichment uranium, Palace produce centrifuge setups necessary to replace what caused the damage of the machines do not even Iran could use the six-month period in the storage of additional quantities of centrifuges, not to establish any additional enrichment facilities. * Committed to halt any progress with regard to increasing its stockpile of enriched uranium by 3.5% through: Not to increase its stockpile of enriched uranium by 3.5%, so as not to increase the amount at the end of a period of six months than they were at the beginning and the transfer of any quantities is enriched uranium by 3.5% to oxide, and has committed not to make any progress in the activities reactor Arak and halt progress in the path plutonium extraction. * Committed to the following: Do not run the Arak reactor, failure to provide the Arak reactor fuel, stopping the production of fuel for the Arak reactor, not to carry out any further tests of fuel reactor Arak, do not install any additional components for the Arak reactor, not to transfer any fuel or heavy water for the reactor site, not to establish any facility capable reprocessing, and without reprocessing Iran can not separate the plutonium from the spent fuel, allowing a daily basis for the inspectors and the IAEA to enter the Natanz and Fordo, and will allow the inspectors to review what his image cameras to ensure overall control, and will provide greater transparency to respect enrichment in these two locations and reduces the time to monitor any overrun in the commitment agreement, allow for the International Atomic Energy Agency for the facilities assemble centrifuges, to allow for the International Atomic Energy Agency to enter production facilities and storage of centrifuge components, allowing for the International Atomic Energy Agency to enter the uranium mines and plants outfitted, provide information design required for a long time about the Arak reactor. This will provide detailed information about sensitive reactor were not available before, providing more opportunities for inspectors to enter the Arak reactor, providing certain key data and information they are required under the Additional Protocol to the Safeguards Agreement with Iran's atomic energy agency. * A mechanism to verify compliance: Will be the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) being required to perform a lot of steps to verify consistent with the role of inspections continuing the Agency, in addition to the commitment of Iran and the five powers plus one composition of a joint committee to work with the IAEA to monitor the implementation and address any problems that may arise. D The joint committee also will work with the IAEA to facilitate the settlement of past and current concerns with respect to Iran's nuclear program including possible military dimension to Iran's nuclear program and Iran's activities in Parchin. What abide by the 5 +1 * Not to impose any new sanctions with respect to the nuclear program for a period of six months, if taken into account Iran's obligations under this Agreement as permitted by their political systems. * Stop certain sanctions on gold and precious metals and the automotive sector and Iranian petrochemical exports to allow Iran Iran revenues approaching $ 1.5 billion. * License reforms regarding safety inspections inside Iran for some airlines Iran. * Allow the survival of purchases of Iranian oil at current levels to severely low levels of less than 60% from what it was two years ago. And will allow the transfer of $ 4.2 billion of the proceeds from these sales in batches if Iran has fulfilled its obligations. * Allow the transfer of 400 million dollars of aid from the government education money directly to the Iranian unrestricted educational institutions recognized in third countries to cover educational expenses for students Iranians. Humanitarian deals * Facilitate transactions humanity currently permitted under U.S. law. The U.S. Congress has exempted the transactions humanity explicitly sanctions, so the item will not allow Iran to any source of new assets. The deals are related to purchases of humanitarian Iran of food and agricultural commodities, medicine and medical devices. And will also facilitate transactions for medical expenses abroad for the benefit of the Iranian people. Comprehensive solution * During the first phase, which lasts six months will negotiate the five powers plus one on the general principles for a comprehensive solution. Even now constitutes a general framework for a comprehensive solution envisages concrete steps give the international community confidence that Iran's nuclear activities exclusively peaceful. With regard to the overall solution, there is no agreement on anything. Over the next six months will determine whether there is a solution allows us sufficient confidence that Iran's program is peaceful. If Iran has failed to address our concerns, we are ready to increase sanctions and pressure.