Syrian refugees face rising humanitarian crisis

Headlines
- Clashes in Tripoli have continued between Sunnis and Alawites who back rival factions in Syria's civil war, bringing the death toll to 24 since Sunday; meanwhile, Lebanon's Sunni leaders have asked security agencies to create a plan to end the fighting.
- At least seven soldiers in central Iraq died on Thursday in two separate incidents, one at a checkpoint in Taji, and another during an exchange of fire with militants near Karma.
- Turkey's parliament has passed a law that restricts the sale of alcohol and prohibits all advertising of alcohol.
- Fighters allied with Al-Qaeda have taken control of villages near the Yemini port city of Mukalla, in an effort to claim the southeastern province of Hadramawt.
Syria: the imperative of de-escalation (Julien Barnes-Dacey and Daniel Levy, The European Council on Foreign Relations)
"After more than two years of devastating destruction, a rare moment of opportunity has emerged in Syria following the US-Russian agreement to launch Geneva II. Europe must now get fully behind the peace initiative and reject the false choice between the supposed "military-lite" or "diplomacy-lite" options - that the military balance can be tipped without a weighty intervention, or that diplomacy can advance without having to deal with Assad or Iran. Instead, by promoting de-escalation and diplomacy, the West should prioritise ratcheting down violence and the threat of regional spill over.
A serious Geneva II effort requires three key elements: a set of guiding principles distilled from Geneva I; the support of a wide enough coalition; and a diplomatic strategy to get it off the ground. Effective diplomacy will demand unpalatable compromises aimed at securing sufficient international accord to nudge the warring parties towards the negotiating table. This will have to be inclusive in terms of both Syrian and regional participation - including engaging with Iran beyond the nuclear file. Western arming of rebels is ill-advised given its likely limited impact on the ground, encouragement of escalation and maximalism, and the inability to guarantee in whose hands weapons will end up. At the same time contingency planning for chemical weapons use or proliferation is necessary but is not a substitute for, or short-cut to, a solution for the crisis."
What the United States Can Do for Egypt Right Now (Steven A. Cook, Blog, Council on Foreign Relations)
""How can the United States help Egypt?" is a common question heard around the Beltway these days. There are lots of good ideas, but too often they do not address the country's immediate and most pressing needs. It should be clear that Washington is not going to fix Egypt's political problems no matter how many times people say, "we need to get Egypt right." That complex and difficult task is up to the Egyptians-though there are a few discrete policies that Washington can pursue that might be helpful. All that said, here are four initiatives the United States can undertake that can make a difference in Egypt over the next 3 to 6 to 12 months:
The United States, European Union, and Asian allies should pool resources and provide loan guarantees for Egypt;
Food aid to Egypt ended in 1992; it should be started again;
The United States should continue to backstop Egypt's public health system through additional investment in NAMRU (Navy Medical Research Unit) 3, which is based in Cairo, though it is responsible for the entire Middle East, Africa, and Southwest Asia;
Everyone-Americans, Egyptians, Israelis-recognize that the Sinai is a major problem. Although it is not just a security problem, in the short run the United States can do some good in the Sinai through the expansion of the Multinational Force Observers that have been stationed in there since 1982 and working with both the Israelis and Egyptians on expanding their communication and intelligence cooperation."
No comments:
Post a Comment