Wednesday, May 15, 2013

ANOTHER Scandal Rocks Obama Department Of Justice by Ulsterman on May 16, 2013 with 0 Comments in News Congressman Devin Nunes gave this bombshell interview indicating the Obama DOJ actually bugged Congress… (It appears “Obama’s Firewall” has been very-very busy abusing his authority) _________________________________ (via GatewayPundit) Oh My… Breaking: Holder Justice Department Also Tapped House of Representatives Cloak Room Congressman Devin Nunes (R-CA) went on the Hugh Hewitt Show tonight and dropped this bombshell. The Holder-Obama Justice Department tapped the House of Representatives Cloak Room. Read more in News « BREAKING: Obama White House Just Caught In HUGE Lie/Contradiction – See Proof Here. DN: No, I absolutely do not, especially after this wiretapping incident, essentially, of the House of Representative. I don’t think people are focusing on the right thing when they talk about going after the AP reporters. The big problem that I see is that they actually tapped right where I’m sitting right now, the Cloak Room. HH: Wait a minute, this is news to me. DN: The Cloak Room in the House of Representatives. HH: I have no idea what you’re talking about. DN: So when they went after the AP reporters, right? Went after all of their phone records, they went after the phone records, including right up here in the House Gallery, right up from where I’m sitting right now. So you have a real separation of powers issue that did this really rise to the level that you would have to get phone records that would, that would most likely include members of Congress, because as you know… HH: Wow. The cloakrooms serve as a place for members to socialize, eat, and take naps without leaving the building. These rooms are closed to all except for Senators and Representatives, and a few of their trusted staffers, and even have their own phone numbers. LINK ___________________________________ BREAKING: Obama White House Just Caught In HUGE Lie/Contradiction – See Proof Here. BOOM! WHI Interview Confirmed – “CIA Source Says Another Shoe To Drop On Obama” WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: “For the first time – Barack Obama truly fears American public opinion” ___________________________________ “The United States is no more…and hidden away within the isolated wilderness of Alaska’s interior resides the tiny community of Dominatus. There lives a small but diverse group of people seeking out simple lives ofpersonal liberty and freedom, but who now face termination under the oppressive and deadly regime of the New United Nations. They will fight and if need be, die for an America that once was. An America before being swallowed up by the monster of tyrannical global governance. An Americabefore the mandates. An America before the government drone killings. AnAmerica before Obama…” “FANTASTIC BOOK! STARTED READING AND COULD NOT PUT IT DOWN.” -GUN TOTIN’ GAL “THE #1 CONSERVATIVE STORY OF THE YEAR!” LINK “Once you pick it up you will not be able to put it down. Read it soon, then every news story you read will make you think of this book, and wonder, hmmmmm……” -JoJo

Rand Paul: Obama is working with ‘anti-American globalists plot[ting] against our Constitution.’

Rand Paul. (AFP)
Rand Paul. (AFP)
The New York Times calls Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) one of the Republican Party’s “rising stars.” The Daily Beast says he’s “a smoother, more pragmatic political operator” than his father, former congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul (R-Tex.). All that seems true. So riddle me this: What’s the upside for Paul to put his name on e-mails like this one, which landed in my inbox this morning?
It’s one thing for no-name pols to work on the fringes. But Paul, at this point, has a lot to lose. Yet here he is, suggesting the current president of the United States is working with “anti-American globalists plot[ting] against our Constitution.” And for what?
Here’s the whole e-mail. It’s on behalf of the National Association on Gun Rights, and it leads you to this Paul-centric splash page.
Dear fellow Patriot,
Gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.
You see, only hours after re-election, Barack Obama immediately made a move for gun control…
On November 7th, his administration gleefully voted at the UN for a renewed effort to pass the “Small Arms Treaty.”
But after the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut — and anti-gun hysteria in the national media reaching a fever pitch — there’s no doubt President Obama and his anti-gun pals believe the timing has never been better to ram through the U.N.’s global gun control crown jewel.
I don’t know about you, but watching anti-American globalists plot against our Constitution makes me sick.
This Spring, the United Nations went back into session to finalize their radical so-called “Small Arms Treaty.”
With the treaty finalized, a full U.S. Senate ratification showdown could come any time President Obama chooses and there will be very little time to fight back.
If we’re to succeed, we must fight back now.
That’s why I’m helping lead the fight to defeat the UN “Small Arms Treaty” in the United States Senate.
And it’s why I need your help today.
Will you join me by taking a public stand against the UN “Small Arms Treaty” and sign the Official Firearms Sovereignty Survey right away?
Ultimately, UN bureaucrats will stop at nothing to registerban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.
So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept many of their schemes under wraps.
But looking at previous attempts by the UN to pass global gun control, you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.
You can bet the UN is working to FORCE the U.S. to implement every single one of these anti-gun policies:***  Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding Americans cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;
***  CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);
***  BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;
***  Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
I’m sure I don’t have to tell you this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.
Ever since its founding 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.
To the petty dictators and one-world socialists who control the UN, the United States of America isn’t a “shining city on a hill” — it’s an affront to their grand designs for the globe.
These anti-gun globalists know that as long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they’ll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide power they crave.
And the UN’s apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.
That’s why I was so excited to see the National Association for Gun Rights leading the fight to stop the UN “Small Arms Treaty!”
Will you join them by going on record AGAINST global gun control and sign the Official Firearms Sovereignty Survey today?
The truth is there’s no time to waste.
You and I have to be prepared for this fight to move FAST.
The fact is the last thing the gun-grabbers at the UN and in Washington, D.C. want is for you and me to have time to mobilize gun owners to defeat this radical agenda.
They’ve made that mistake before, and we’ve made them pay, defeating EVERY attempt to ram the UN Small Arms Treaty into law since the mid-1990s.
But now time may not be on our side.
And worse… the UN Small Arms Treaty is no longer the only UN scheme threatening our gun rights.
More and more of the UN’s radical agenda is slipping through covertly, under the cover of domestic legislation.
Not long ago, Obama told Sarah Brady from the anti-gun Brady Campaign, “I just want you to know that we are working on [gun control].  We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”
In fact, Hillary Clinton’s State Department recently bragged that Project Gunrunner and Operation Fast and Furious are implementations of the UN’s anti-gun agenda!
And I’d place a wager that Obama’s M1 Rifle Re-importation Ban was also the UN’s agenda dutifully executed by his administration.
Anti-gun UN policy that NEVER received a single vote in the United States Congress!
The UN met recently to pass a final version of the “Small Arms Treaty” to be sent for ratification by the Senate.
So if you and I are going to defeat them, we have to turn the heat up on Washington now before it’s too late!
1.  Do you believe the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment are the supreme law of the land?
2.  Do you believe any attempt by the United Nations to subvert or supersede your Constitutional rights must be opposed?
If you said “Yes!” to these questions, please sign the survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you.
But I hope you’ll do more than just sign your survey today.
With your help, the National Association for Gun Rights will continue to turn up the heat on targeted Senators who are working to implement the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”
Direct mail.  Phones.  E-mail.  Blogs.  Guest editorials.  Press conferences.  Hard-hitting internet, newspaper, radio and even TV ads if funding permits.  The whole nine yards.
Of course, a program of this scale is only possible if the National Association for Gun Rights can raise the money.
But that’s not easy, and we may not have much time.
In fact, if gun owners are going to defeat the UN’s schemes, pro-gun Americans like you and me have to get involved NOW!
So please put yourself on record AGAINST the UN Gun Ban by signing NAGR’s Firearms Sovereignty Survey.
But along with your survey, please agree to make a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35.
And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.
Thank you in advance for your time and money devoted to defending our Second Amendment rights.
For Freedom,
Rand Paul
United States Senator
P.S. Only hours after re-election Barack Obama immediately made a move for gun control…
On November 7th, his administration gleefully voted at the UN for a renewed effort to pass the “Small Arms Treaty.”
What’s worse, the UN met in March to pass the final version of the treaty that will be sent to the Senate for ratification.
If we’re going to defeat the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” gun owners have to turn the heat up now before it’s too late!
Please return your Firearms Sovereignty Survey and put yourself squarely on the record AGAINST the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”
And if you can, please make a generous contribution to the National Association for Gun Rights of $250, $150, $100 or even just $35 right away!
And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.
By the way: This treaty, at least as described here, is total fantasy. The hoax-busters at will catch you up, and just for good measure, PolitiFact gave similar claims the old pants-on-fire. This is black helicopter stuff from Paul.

Chris Matthews Turns On Obama: “He Obviously Likes Giving Speeches More Than He Does Running The Executive Branch”…

President Obama “obviously likes giving speeches more than he does running the executive branch,” Chris Matthews said tonight.
Yes, you read that right: The MSNBC host who in 2008 felt a “thrill going up my leg” after hearing Obama speak has grown disenchanted. Tonight’s episode of Hardball saw Matthews delivering a rare, unforgiving grilling of the president as severe as anything that might appear on Fox News.
“What part of the presidency does Obama like? He doesn’t like dealing with other politicians — that means his own cabinet, that means members of the congress, either party. He doesn’t particularly like the press…. He likes to write the speeches, likes to rewrite what Favreau and the others wrote for the first draft,” Matthews said.
“So what part does he like? He likes going on the road, campaigning, visiting businesses like he does every couple days somewhere in Ohio or somewhere,” Matthews continued. “But what part does he like? He doesn’t like lobbying for the bills he cares about. He doesn’t like selling to the press. He doesn’t like giving orders or giving somebody the power to give orders. He doesn’t seem to like being an executive.” Read more via Politico...

Alabama Supreme Court Justice Says Barack Obama Birth Certificate Would Not Stand Up In Court

Albama Supreme Court building SC 300x199 Alabama Supreme Court Justice Says Barack Obama Birth Certificate Would Not Stand Up in Court
Finally someone in America is paying attention to the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse investigation report indicating that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud.
Hugh McInnish of Alabama filed a lawsuit against the Alabama Secretary of State challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to have his name on the November 2012 ballot for President of the United States. One of the stipulations in the case was a request to obtain an original copy of Obama’s birth certificate.
In a decision written on March 6, 2012, the Alabama State Supreme Court denied McInnish’s demand of obtaining the birth certificate copy before allowing Obama’s name to be placed on the ballot. The denial was not based on the merit of the evidence of forgery of the birth certificate, rather it was denied because they did not believe that the state supreme court had legal jurisdiction of the matter. To quote Alabama Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker:
“The language of the foregoing provision of the Alabama Constitution implies that this Court is without jurisdiction over Mcinnish’s original petition for a writ of mandamus. It is not our appellate jurisdiction that is being invoked, and this matter is not within original jurisdiction of this Court ‘to issue such remedial writs or orders as may be necessary to give it general supervision and control of courts of inferior jurisdiction.’ Ala. Const. 1901, Art. VI, § 140. The office of the Secretary of State of Alabama is not a ‘court of inferior jurisdiction; that this Court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a petition first filed in this Court…”
However, Justice Parker wrote that the evidence McInnish provided along with the findings of the Cold Case Posse make Obama’s birth certificate to be highly suspect and questions if it would be able to stand up in a court of law. He also said that he is experienced in computer science and indicated he concurs with the conclusion of forgery made by the Cold Case Posse.
Read More at Godfather Politics By da Tagliare, Godfather Politics

Stephen Harper’s government has asked country’s Postal Workers Union (CUPW) to apologize for insulting Canada’s closest ally and the only democracy in the Middle East, Israel.

philatelynews_Israel_canada[1]The union is once again chased by the powerful Jewish lobby groups for using its news letter to spread hatred towards Israel. “Canada is allowing Israel to terrorize occupied people, breach international law, normalize home demolition, build prison-style walls, checkpoints and steal resources,” says March newsletter.

Steven Fletcher, Harper’s minister of transporation, who also oversees Canada Post, has slammed the CUPW for crossing the “red-line”. “The CUPW should apologize for this misuse of public funds,” he said.

Jewish MP Mark Adler, member of Harper’s Conservative Party, has claimed that the newsletter outraged the Jewish community and many members of the parliament and union members.

Israel lobby groups, in past, had claimed that CUPW used fund on political activitism against state of Israel. They have accused CUPW for funded activists to attend the World Social Forum’s “Free Palestine” conference in Porto Alegre, Brazil, and a confab in Holguin, Cuba to demand the US release five Cuban agents arrested for espionage. CUPW has refused the allegations.

In January 2013, when Canada Post issued a new stamp in honor of Swedish-born Jew, Raoul Wallenberg, for saving 100,000 Jews in Hungary during WW II – all these whinos congratulated head of Canada Post, Indian-born Hindu Deepak Chopra.

In the past, Canada Post have issued stamps commemoratig Jewish events which were never blamed for being politically motivated. For example, it issued a stamp wishing 23 million Canadians “Happy Chanukah” in October 2011. In 2010 Canada Post issued a stamp marking the 60th anniversary of Canada’s bilateral relations with Israel (see top left). In 1995, it issed a stamp to publicize the Jewish Holocaust.
The CUPW leadership is known for its criticism of the Zionist regime. It was the first Canadian union to call for the boycott of the Zionist entity in 2008. the union has 54,000 members. Canada Post is a ‘Crown Corporation’.

I would like to end this post by quoting the most dumb propaganda piece I have the misfortune to read against CUPW. On March 6, 2013, some so-called the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies (FSWC) posted the following statement:

There is an absolute neglect by CUPW of the ongoing anti-Jewish violence and terror faced by Israel on a daily basis. This demonstrates a profound bias against a people who, despite being repeatedly dispossessed throughout history, have managed to create the only democratic nation in the Middle East with equal rights for all its citizens on the land which is their historical birthright,” says Avi Benlolo, President and CEO of FSWC.

How some person could be so idiot? American Jewish author Marianne Williamson told Kevin Barrett PhD last year that Israel is not a democracy. On the other hand, Israeli columnist, Gideon Levy, in daily Ha’aretz called Israel a half democracy. I wonder if Benlolo ever bothered to study some objective source to find out why his Khazarian ancestors were expelled from almost every European country – 108 times?

The Simon Wiesenthal Center, which is named after the ‘Farther of Holocaust’ Simon Wiesenthal – less said the better. Israeli historian and author, Tom Segev PhD, has called Wiesenthal, ”a fame-seeking myth-maker and an Israeli Mossad agent”. Former Austrian Jewish Chancellor Bruno Kreisky called Weisenthal a “Gestapo collaborator”. Dr. Norman Finkelstein in his controversial book ‘The Holocaust Industry’ called Wiesenthal “a liar”.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Print Article Send a Tip

State Department Pushed to Cut Mention of Prior Attacks from Benghazi Talking Points

This afternoon the White House released a 100 pages of repetitive emails from September 14th and 15th. The emails confirm that the State Department was deeply concerned about a bullet point highlighting prior attacks in Benghazi.

The email release shows that individuals inside the White House were sent copies of the talking points earlier than previously reported. Ben Rhodes, a top Obama adviser, received a draft at 3:04PM on Sep. 14th. This early draft still referred to "attacks" rather than "demonstrations" at the Consulate. Tommy Vietor, the National Security Spokesman, also received these early drafts of the talking points.
By 6:21PM, Vietor had responded with a suggestion that certain parts of the talking points might be of concern to State, saying "Denis would like to make sure the highlighted portions are full [sic] coordinated with the State Department in the event that they get inquiries."
The pdfs of the talking points are not high quality and it is difficult to tell which portions have been "highlighted." However, looking closely it does appear as if sections of bullet point 4--a list of prior attacks in Benghazi--may have been highlighted. At 6:24PM, the State Department was looped in to the conversation.
Shortly afterwards, at  7:16PM, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland replied, "The line about 'knowing' there were extremists among the demonstrators will come back to us at the podium--how do we know, who were they, etc." The CIA responded at 7:29PM "Can we soften this a bit?"
The tone changes at 7:39PM when Nuland writes "I now understand that these are being prepared to give to Members of Congress to use with the media. On that basis I have serious concerns about all the parts highlighted below..." Nuland says she doesn't want to "prejudice the investigation" but then adds "the penultimate point could be abused by Members [of Congress] to beat the State Department for not paying attention to Agency warnings so why do we want to feed that either. Concerned..."
At this point, the email chain published by the White House is disjointed and it is once again not clear which portions of the talking points were "highlighted below" by Victoria Nuland. At 7:52 the CIA responded that they were awaiting response from the FBI about prejudicing the investigation.
A bit later, at 8:59pm, David Adams the Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs at the State Department chimed in saying "I'm with Toria [Nuland]. The last bullet especially will read like we had been repeatedly warned." Though he says the last bullet, he seems to be indicating the penultimate one that Nuland had also expressed concern about. At the time it read:
The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa’ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya.  These noted that, since April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British Ambassador’s convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks.
As the night wore on, others described the response from State as a serious pushback. At 9:15PM the CIA wrote "Here's where we stand as of this hour...The State Department had major reservations with much or most of the document. We revised the document with their concerns in mind." [Emphasis added] A new draft of the talking points was attached.
At 9:24PM Nuland responded "These don't resolve all my issues or those of my building leadership. They are consulting with NSS [National Security Spokesman at the White House]." At 9:32 Jacob Sullivan wrote a response "Talked to Tommy [Vietor, NSS spokesman]--we can make edits."
At 9:43PM an update from the CIA "Fyi FBI says AQ {not AQIM} was involved and they are pursuing that theory. So we are not ahead of law enforcement now."
At 9:52PM the CIA sends out a draft which is going to be sent to the "DIRECTOR" explaining what has taken place. It reads in part "We've tried to work the draft talking points for HPSCI [Congress] through the coordination process but have run into major problems...The White House  cleared quickly, but State has major concerns."
On page 63 of the email release is a version of the talking points with nearly everything crossed out. It's not clear from the way this was released, who crossed this out or at what time.
Finally, at 12:37PM the next day, "MichaelJM" writes of the final draft of the talking points "I spoke to the Director earlier about State's deep concerns about mentioning the warnings and the other work done on this..."
Reading the entire chain, it appears the White House initially alerted State that some language might be of concern. Once Victoria Nuland realized the talking points were headed to Congress for use with the media, she and "building leadership" wanted references to prior attacks taken out.
The emails confirm that State was deeply concerned about being blamed by Congress and that those concerns were heeded by the White House and CIA.

The way out of ObamaNation is the collapse of Agenda 21

By Judi McLeod (Bio and Archives)  Friday, November 30, 2012
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
As dominant as he is in our worries and thoughts,  the man they call Barack Hussein Obama is not the most important Agent of Change in daily life.  Deliberately flamboyant by design, he’s only the most noticeable one.
Obama is the handpicked decoy for this particular point in time; the one who draws attention away from One Worlders who work to capture America by stealth; the seemingly impossible to remove Candy Man, enabled by 50 percent of the U.S. voting population.
As prime decoy, Obama is the main player on the current politician populated World stage.  While their antics keep all eyes trained their way, the real Agent of Change works 24-7 in the background laying the groundwork to enslave you.
The more outrageous antics the performance of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and now Elizabeth Warren and Debbie Wasserman Schultz mesmerize,  the more we miss seeing the subtle noose descending on an unknowing population.
We curse Obama and his loathsome personal ‘Army of Czars & Stars’; we whine about the stolen election.  We torture ourselves with the reasons why he can’t be defeated.  We fall for stories circulating the Net building false hopes that a vote recount is coming any day now; that a plurality of longstanding American states will secede.
And through it all,  a majority of us completely ignore society’s most clear and present danger: The freedom and liberty smothering United Nations through its insidious Agenda 21.
Glenn Beck and Harriet Parke have a new book out about Agenda 21.  Canada Free Press writers Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh, author of UN Agenda 21: Environmental Piracy  and Kelly O’Connell write about it.  The late Henry Lamb dedicated a lifetime to the impact of Agenda 21 on the masses,  and that’s not counting the so many others.
Agenda 21 is the carbon monoxide of the world of bureaucratic entrapment.  It has already poisoned and killed you before anyone noticed its presence.
“In case you’re still unsure how Agenda 21 operates, especially in relationship to local activities, allow Mark Edward Vande Pol – a former Agenda 21 planner for Santa Cruz County – to explain the process. (Carl Teichrib,
“This is Agenda 21. The UN intends to control your life, through incremental mandates instituted by your local government bureaucracy. You will never see it. You will never vote on it. No matter which path they use, the agencies can pen the new regulations under ‘threat’ of lawsuit and down the pipe it comes: enforceable administrative rules without legislation.”[1
The UN successfully fends off citizen resistance to Agenda 21 by hiding it behind innocuous sounding names like “sustainable development” and by branding all resisters as conspiracy theorists.
But the build-up to One World Government for North America is fully documented and there is irrefutable proof in the making of Agenda 21 that it transcends a left-right paradigm.
Though it was to devolve through a myriad of revolutions, Agenda 21 got its beginning when Canadian UN Poster Boy Maurice Strong fell in with the Rockefellers and their storied wealth.  Nondescript and never pinned down by household word fame, it was Maurice Strong who brought in thousands of environmentalists and NGOs to fight a cause that continues to this day. 
For the past four years,  we’ve heard Barack Obama blame Bush for all of America’s ills. 
Blaming Bush takes on new meaning when we look through the rear view mirror of time and realize that former President George Herbert Walker Bush was the fist American president in modern times to sell America out to One World Government UN control.
Little if any public shock was registered when Bush said on Sept. 11, 1990: “Out of these troubled times, our objective—a new world order—can emerge.  Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we have known.”
It is documented proof that it was Pappy Bush who birthed One World Government on an unsuspecting America.  It was slick circus medicine man former President William Clinton, in tandem with Nancy Pelosi, who sustained it.  It was former President George W. Bush who signed papers for a North American Union with Mexico and Canada, and Barack Hussein Obama who the UN would bring into power to fully implement it.
This is how the UN’s Agenda 21 fully transcended the left-right paradigm.
Obama has another four more years to implement One World Order.  If the UN’s end game cannot be accomplished during the next four years, Obama will run and win the presidential election again.
Canada not only provided the architect of One World Order in Maurice Strong, it played the most major role in carrying the banner of the “New World Agenda” into the next century.
Americans in the know looking to where One World Government originated should look no further than their number one trading partner in the country next door. 
“Unknown to the majority of Americans, Canada has positioned itself on the cutting edge of international environmental/political change.  Although its population is one tenth of the US, its leadership role in the “global experiment” cannot be overstated. (Carl Teichrib).  “As Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien once said, “We are one world.  We in Canada feel this deeply.  Responsible international citizenship is one of our proudest shared values.  And the place we exercise that responsible citizenship is in multilateral organizations the town hall meetings of the world community. 
“In the words of Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, ‘Canada is in the forefront of efforts to ensure that the United Nations is prepared for the challenges of the future.’  Indeed, his country’s involvement in the international globalization process has been extremely systematic.  Besides being the planetary meeting ground and sponsor for major sustainable development events, Canada has furthered the path to globalism by contributing to the environmental “intelligentsia”—the thought process undergirding the movement. Consider the following quotes from a 1992 meeting of the Canadian Council for International Co-operation:
“‘We need a unified one world order to replace the collectivity of nation states at the international level. The Euro-American model which now dominates the world systematically disables people, destroys the earth and creates dependency on wage labour’.
“In this model, politics loses its left-versus-right conflict and moves instead towards a fundamental concern for the health of the ecosystem…Democracy is replaced with “biocracy”, where not people but life-sustaining systems are the central concern.  Democracy remains a need within this model, at both local and global levels, but as one part of the whole system.  “Participation”  becomes more than people’s physical presence and deepens to contain a cultural and spiritual dimension…To implement these concepts, we start with bringing the community together and look at the land resources available.  We decide how we want the community to evolve and decide who has control of the resources.
“Likewise, the following statement from the Canadian federal government to the United Nations contains a similar thread—a sustainable world order based on complete world management.
“Canada believes the establishment of an international financial and economic system that is conducive to sustainable development must be a cornerstone of efforts to implement Agenda 21.  Canada strongly supports efforts to reform international organizations to ensure effectiveness and efficiency in the promotion of global sustainable development.”
The age of Canada’s complicity in One World Government predates the chilling words of Carl Teichrib written in 1999: “Recently I received an email concerning Canada’s role in the push for global government.  At its core, the message spoke of America’s need to look towards Canada in order to understand the forces pressuring US global integration.  As a Canadian, I recognize the truth of that statement, and find it deeply troubling to watch as my country carries the banner of the “New World Order Agenda” into the next century.
“America needs to look beyond its own borders to understand what is happening within its borders.  The largest trading partner the US has is Canada.  With that in mind, it should have concerned everyone in both countries when Prime Minister Jean Chrétien explained that the United Nations is “the centre piece of Canadian foreign policy.  This foreign policy, this promotion of “global order” is taking North America down the fast track to international socialism.  Hidden under the guise of sustainable development, our two nations are trading freedom for a draconian world agenda. 
“What will it take to wake us up?”
In the years that followed Teichrib’s poignant question, a UN sanctioned community activist promising the fundamental transformation of America was elected in 2008 and was reelected in 2012.
Canada eventually slipped the bonds of its 12-year Liberal rule when Jean Chrétien was calling the shots.  As this piece is being written, the Stephen Harper Conservative Government—the first majority one after five years of two minority governments,  is one and a half years into its first majority. 
So far Harper has done nothing to free Canada from UN grip.
The gathering storm provided by a joint effort by the Liberals and the New Democratic Party has been trying to come up with the right strategy to force the Conservative government to fall.
For all those who rest in the false comfort that that will never happen should look to Toronto, where Rob Ford, the first conservative mayor in living memory, was forced to give up a seat won by 380,000 votes via an obscure municipal law left on the books, just this week.
In order for the citizen population of North America to find its way out of the dark, citizens must come together to somehow find the way to break the yoke of Agenda 21.
It could easily be of North America that the question “Who’s Your Daddy?” could be asked.
If we are to regain our freedom as sovereign nations, our search for the answers must take us beyond Barack Hussein Obama.
It will take a lot of work to turn the tide on Agenda 21, but it is a possibility.
Its increasing control of our towns and cities notwithstanding,  Agenda 21 is not impossible to put down and defeat because Agenda 21 has at least one provable weakness.  Had it not been for Smart Meters, public attention might never have been called to the encroaching One World Order being implemented today by Barack

Intel Exclusive: Trillion Dollar Terror Exposed


Bush, Fed, Europe Banks in $15 Trillion Fraud, All Documented

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor


Below is one of the strangest stories in financial history, one involving the US government lying about hundreds of thousands of tons of imaginary gold, illegal wire transfers and loans totalling $15 trillion.  The video, from the House of Lords, is amazing in itself. 
What it doesn’t express is where the money came from though Lord James of Blackheath proves conclusively that an effort was made to say it came from a gold reserve in Brunei that, in fact, never existed.
At surface, it appears we have stumbled upon the largest terrorist organization in the world and have found original documents tracing its funding to the Secretary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, two of the top financial officers in the US.  A cursory review of terrorism statues in the US indicate that all transactions we will learn about are, in fact, to be assumed “terrorist money laundering” and that the only thing preventing the immediate arrest of hundreds of top financial officials is their political connections alone.

YouTube - Veterans Today -
We will be able to offer an alternative, more insights, some hard intelligence and some very valuable background that we hope will offer insightful and realistic perspectives on this amazing story.
On February 16, 2012, Lord James of Blackheath, member of Britain’s House of Lords presented evidence of an illegal scheme begun, he has thus discovered, in 2009.  His documents including originals signed by Alan Greenspan and Timothy Geithner, show the illegal “off the books” transfer by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of $15 trillion to, initially, HSBC (Hong Kong Shanghai Banking Corporation) London and then to the Bank of Scotland.
The Bank of Scotland, under royal charter but restricted from involvement in any such transactions, simply “gave” the money to 20 European banks to use in a highly profitable scheme of co-trading “fresh cut” MTN’s (mid-term notes), generating trillions of dollars in profits over 3 years, none of which is shown on books, none has been taxed or has benefited shareholders in those banks.
As Blackheath outlines, the “deception and cover” for this transfer is the imaginary seizure of 750,000 tons of gold by agents of an unspoken entity (confirmed by the highest official sources as the Bush family and CIA), the listed “source” of the money.
The government of Indonesia confirms this to be an utter fabrication and that the individual named had 700 tons of gold (about half of what Gaddafi was holding), not 750,000.  It is noted that only 1,500 tons of gold have ever been traded in world history, as stated in the House of Lords.
The issues that are initially brought out, issues inconsistent with international convention and starting the reader on what is only the surface discovery of two decades of crimes involving dozens of governments are as follows:
  • At no time has the Federal Reserve Bank of New York been authorized to hold the funds indicated
  • However, documents held by Lord Blackheath prove, conclusively that they did hold such funds and transfer them in a manner as to obscure their origin by using HSBC and the Bank of Scotland.  This process, seemingly involving Alan Greenspan, Timothy Geithner and others would appear to be “money laundering” until some other explanation were found.  None has been offered.
  • The “collateralization” of these funds, being 750,000 tons of gold, is proven to be fantasy.  These funds then, in no way or manner, are related to Brunei.  The presentation of this false transaction has been conclusively proven to be a “cover and deception” project such as an intelligence organization would use.
  • The transfer of these funds, all done without any authorizations, governmental or otherwise, particularly without agreements, payment of interest to the United States and without knowledge and approval of congress makes every aspect of this criminal in nature, a violation of innumerable statutes.
  • The receipt and use of these funds by the 20 banks, two of which are Wall Street’s largest, and the use of these funds to generate profits while the funds themselves are held “off the books” and the profits hidden and laundered, themselves the earnings of funds received through criminal acts makes any and all involved part of a criminal enterprise.
There is no record of the Federal Reserve being authorized to “create” $15 trillion, equal to the entire national debt of the United States.  There is, however, proof that funds that totalled, at one time, $27 trillion had been earned surreptitiously, disposed of as part of an intelligence operation against the Soviet Union and then later stolen with accusations made against George H. W. Bush as being the perpetrator.
I have spoken with two individuals, one President Reagan’s intelligence coordinator and the other Chief Legal Cousel for the Central Intelligence Agency regarding these funds.  Both have indicated that former President Bush had asked that these funds, totalling $27 trillion, be transferred to his control, that threats were made by Bush and that many involved in this operation suffered, issues including murder, illegal arrest, torture and detention among them.
The individuals I am speaking of repeatedly met with President  Bush over these funds, disputed his claim to them, and indicate that the majority of the funds are the property of the people of the United States.
These funds are the mysterious “Wanta” funds, monies earned through years of currency trading aimed at collapsing the Soviet Union, a plan originated by President Ronald Reagan, then White House Intelligence Coordinator Lee Wanta and CIA Director William Casey.  I have been told that, while this operation went forward under President Reagan, he had ordered that his successor, George H. W. Bush not be “briefed” out of “mistrust” for Bush.
The funds themselves were earned through a scheme of trading Soviet roubles at enormous profit, a practice that eventually collapsed their government.  A portion of the profits are subject to current litigation in the Federal Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, Judge Lee presiding.  I have over 2,000 pages of documents on this case which shows a remainder of the original funds had been transferred to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond by the Bank of China, a party to the rouble trading practice, in 2006 and is claimed as totally owned by Ameritrust Corporation.  That amount was $4.5 trillion of which we hold the SWIFT transfer documents.
The other monies, which “likely” make up from the unspent portion of the missing $27 trillion, may well constitute all that is recoverable.
Wanta, sole shareholder in Ameritrust, has offered his companies share, valued by the court now at $7.2 trillion, entirely to the American people as intended by President Reagan.
The origin of the additional funds, issued by the Federal Reserve during the 80s and 90s, totalling nearly $8 trillion is unknown.   High ranking sources within the US government indicate that this can only be either the remainder of funds Wanta raised or profits made from them after the majority of funds were stolen.
Stories, some quite good actually, and personal interviews plus my own review of documents would place the theft or conversion of these funds initially with:
  • The Bush family
  • The “P2,” a Masonic lodge operating out of Switzerland involved in dozens of terror bombings tied to “Operation Gladio”
  • People around Wanta himself including the CIA
What is lacking is a source for half of these funds.  Technically, they don’t exist as there is no record of them being originated by nor transferred to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York though there are clear and discernible records of them being transferred out of that institution which never possessed them, according to their 2010 audit, in the first place.
The transfer of Wanta funds, they can be assumed to have no other origin as they track into the Federal Reserve banking system while in escrow and are currently awaiting payment based on the orders of President Obama in accordance with findings of the federal court, is complicated by the Scottish transfer.
Either Wanta has claim to the entire amount or it is the property of the US government.  That no effort has been made to secure the funds or enforce criminal and civil remedies to recover enough money to pay the entire US national debt and more, as with earnings, we are nearing well over $30 trillion by this time, is an indication that a criminal conspiracy with enough influence to overrule our own government is involved.  Whether that “conspiracy is, as noted, the Bush family, rouge sections of the CIA or a secret society such as P2, one we can prove or others we only suspect exist, is another story.
The lack of action, here or as requested by Lord James in Britain, is, in itself, proof of both the seriousness and actuality of these events and the powers that can prevent any inquiry when irrefutable documents such as SWIFT transfers are available.  In fact, Lord James has offered a wealth of documents which, when combined with the 2000 pages of Wanta “discovery” from the Federal Court, constitutes more than prima facia evidence of money laundering, conversion, terrorism or worse.
Thus, the inaction in the face of overwhelming and unquestioned proof is inexplicable.
Currently, Wanta’s legal status is as technical conservator and owner of $7.2 trillion.  However, as nearly half that is owed in taxes and the court settlement required Wanta to purchase $1 trillion in treasury bonds, the federal government should show positive interest other than President Obama and a few others.  More are being obstructionist with the payout and exercise of $3 trillion in US debt reduction.
This is, not only illegal but an indication of conspiracy.
In addition, Russian Prime Minister Putin has communicated that he awaits the agreed upon 3% payment of Russian taxes, initially on the $7.2 trillion.  Will Putin want to be paid on the entire $15 trillion plus interest and will Russia and/or the US have interest in why the Bank of Scotland transferred these funds to 20 European banks to trade in MTN’s (mid term notes) without any authorization or agreement, any participation or sharing of profits.
As the funds, at least the half which the US government can claim ownership of, combined with the interest and earnings of, would quickly put the US “in the black,” again we look at, not just the press blackout on the Wanta litigation of the last 6 years but the press blackout on Lord James of Blackheath and the wealth of damning documentation he submitted to Parliament.
Nothing has been done since, it is as though the proof submitted was so dangerous that those moments in time have been erased by a mysterious g-dlike power.
What makes Wanta dangerous is that he has begun to distribute funds, some to government entities, counties and states, law enforcement agencies, giving them standing, not just in recovering funds intended for their use but in helping prosecute anyone involved in interfering with or attempting to divert funds.
One grand jury is being formed to investigate diversion of Wanta funds even at this early date.  It is likely that Wanta/Ameritrust funds earmarked for border protection could lead to the indictment of high ranking US officials.  This is only the beginning.
If the Royal Bank of Scotland doesn’t think it should be expecting the biggest chargeback in the history of the world, they are in for a shock.

Related Posts:

Short URL:

Obama Will Abolish the Suburbs?

The Agenda 21 conspiracy to “wipe out freedoms of all U.S. citizens.”

Suburban Long Island, New York
Suburban Long Island, New York
Photo by Jason Reed/Reuters
Pssst! Have you heard about Agenda 21? The secret plot to collectivize private property—hatched by United Nations internationalists and midwifed by operatives ensconced within our own government—all in the name of "ending sprawl" and "encouraging sustainability"? The seizure of suburban homes by jackbooted, gun-toting U.N. thugs? The involuntary relocation of displaced suburbanites to cramped dwellings in densely packed cities?
No? Seriously? You haven't heard about any of this?
Don't blame Glenn Beck. His magazine, the Blaze, put Agenda 21 on the cover of its January/February 2012 issue; the article contained therein, its editors promised, would expose "the global scheme that has the potential to wipe out freedoms of all U.S. citizens." Beck then stretched this warning into a dystopian science fiction novel that came out last November titled (what else?) Agenda 21. In it, suburban and rural homeowners are stripped of their property and carted off to overcrowded cities, where they're forced to live in bunkerlike apartments, wear government-issued uniforms, and generate power for the grid by walking on piezoelectric "energy boards."
<SCRIPT language='JavaScript1.1' SRC=";abr=!ie;sz=300x250;click=;pc=[TPAS_ID];ord=828194011?"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF=";abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;pc=[TPAS_ID];ord=828194011?"> <IMG SRC=";abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;pc=[TPAS_ID];ord=828194011?" BORDER=0 WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=250 ALT="Advertisement"></A> </NOSCRIPT>
In truth, Agenda 21 is the sort of nonbinding, suggestion-filled "action plan" the United Nations generates whenever it holds any kind of major international summit. It emerged from the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and dedicated to addressing the most vexing environmental problems of the time. Beck, who has made a fine living catering to the tinfoil-hat crowd, is trying to pass off U.N. bullet points as a precursor to real bullets. But you don't have to believe the folks in the black helicopters are eyeing your redwood deck as a future landing pad in order to push the theory that a cabal of environmentalists and elected officials has it in for the 'burbs, and won't rest until every last Olive Garden in America is razed and turned into, well, an actual olive garden.
Last August, Stanley Kurtz, who has lectured at Harvard and the University of Chicago, wrote an article for the stalwart conservative journal National Review that appeared under the provocative headline "Burn Down the Suburbs?" It opened with a zinger: "President Obama is not a fan of America's suburbs. Indeed, he intends to abolish them." Kurtz's article was in many ways a rehash of observations made previously by Joel Kotkin, a writer who specializes in analyzing demographic shifts in cities and suburbs. In 2010 Kotkin, a former New York Times columnist, wrote on his blog that "for the first time in memory, the suburbs are under a conscious and sustained attack from Washington." He later told one interviewer that the Obama administration was "the first anti-suburban administration in American history."
For Beck, Kurtz, and Kotkin, all the evidence one needs to back up such breathless assertions can be found in the language of sustainability and "smart growth" used by environmentalists and their allies in government. Alas, what's being heard and what's actually being said are two different things. The champion of sustainability says: "We need to reduce sprawl by encouraging greater density." But the anxious suburbanite hears: "We're tearing down the houses on your cul-de-sac and replacing them with a 20-story Brutalist apartment building, complete with its own wastewater treatment plant." The champion of sustainability says: "It's time to shift from last century's car culture to the new century's culture of mass transit." The anxious suburbanite hears: "We'll be sending someone around for your Escalade shortly. Fortunately for you, the D train will soon be stopping at your new building—right next to your on-site methadone clinic!"
As someone who was raised in the suburbs and still has deep family roots there, I think I know what's fueling this anxiety. And instead of scoffing at it, I believe the champions of sustainability should be emphasizing how ideas that fall under the rubric of smart growth benefit all of us, wherever we reside. Their new message needs to be: If you really love your suburban quality of life, then know that the greatest threat to it isn't coming from bureaucrats, environmentalists, or liberal politicians. It's coming from that brand-new, almost completed housing development going up right next to yours.



If you watch Al Jazeera, you know Obama's new mission for NASA: To help Muslim nations 'feel good'

Noted hard-luck critter Wile E Coyote

You know how Wile E. Coyote straps himself to the rocket and lights the fuse? And it burns. And burns. Silence. Nothing. He's poised, hopefully, awaiting launch. We wait, painfully, for the bad thing certain to happen.
That's what we've been doing for almost a week now, anticipating the explosive public reaction to word from NASA chief Charles Bolden that President Obama has tasked his once-fabled space agency with a brand-new earthbound mission that has absolutely nothing to do with space.
Perhaps not surprisingly, Bolden's stunning announcement about the taxpayer-funded space agency's new task did not come at home. It came overseas during a televised interview with Al Jazeera, the Middle Eastern TV network.
In the interview (full video below), Bolden reveals that even before the Democratic ...
... president offered him the job as top space official, Obama ordered that his "foremost" assignment was "to reach out to the Muslim world ... to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math and engineering."
Say what?
There's been much skepticism, criticism and suspicion about Obama's "new" space program announced in April, that it was really a beautifully wrapped downsizing and abandonment of the nation's pioneering manned space exploration.
Giving up any more Moon missions. Or unilateral space trips. Relying soon on Russia to ferry U.S. astronauts to the space station --  and maybe even the Acme Supply Co. for parts. All in order to have even more money to spend on the Democrat's expensive earthly social priorities.
Here's that longer Bolden quote about Obama to Al Jazeera:
When I became the NASA administrator -- or before I became the NASA administrator -- he charged me with three things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science ... and math and engineering.
Without the vigilant Byron York, Bolden's bold statement might have gone unnoticed at home, which perhaps was the goal.
Actually, even with the vigilant York's report and his amazing follow-up, the story has largely gone unnoted offline, drawing virtually no coverage from major newspapers and broadcast news operations. They were more focused over the holiday weekend on the latest gaffe by GOP party chairman Michael Steele, who's been filling the political clown role while VP Joe Biden was in Iraq celebrating Obama's war success.
Bolden was in the Middle East as part of a conga line of Obama folks celebrating the first anniversary of the president's Cairo speech to the Muslim world. In Bolden's own remarks in Egypt, recounted by York, the NASA chief noted it has been four decades since the first moon landing. Bolden candidly admitted that under Obama:
--"NASA is not only a space exploration agency, but also an Earth improvement agency."

--"We're not going to go anywhere beyond low Earth orbit as a single entity. The United States can't do it."
The fuse is lit. Here's the video.
-- Andrew Malcolm
Anyone can get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item, by clicking here. Follow us @latimestot Or Like our Facebook page right here. Go here for a Kindle subscription to The Ticket, with a free trial.
Video: Al Jazeera     Photo: Acme Supply Co.