Sunday, June 30, 2013

Princess Coco Flynn.flv

 



Jun 28, 2013 90 Comments Toro520 trayvon-martin-double-finger
Martin Clan
Excerpted from The Last Refuge:
Ironically were it not for Frances Robles writing a Miami Herald article on March 26th 2012 an entire chain of events would not have taken place.
Zimmerman-Trial-Trayvon-Martin-Gun-Drug-Photos-Excluded
It was that Robles article, and the outlining of the Miami-Dade School Police Department’s report on a Trayvon Martin incident from October 2011, that kicked off an internal investigation by M-DSPD Police Chief Hurley against his own officers to find out who leaked the police report.
[Note: The Miami-Dade Public School System has its own Police force, and Chief, who report to the School Board and Superintendent - Not the Police Dept. The Police Chief is appointed by the School Superintendent, in this example, Alberto Carvalho]
October 2011
It was that M-DSPD internal affairs investigation which revealed in October 2011 Trayvon Martin was searched by School Resource Officer, Darryl Dunn. The search of Trayvon Martin’s backpack turned up at least 12 pcs of ladies jewelry, and a man’s watch, in addition to a flat head screwdriver described as “a burglary tool”.
When Trayvon was questioned about who owned the jewelry and where it came from, he claimed he was just holding it for a “friend”. A “friend” he would not name.
Later, after the police report was outlined in the Robles article, and despite Trayvon being suspended for the second time in a new school year, Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, said Trayvon’s dad, Tracy Martin, and Trayvon’s mom, Sybrina Fulton, did not know anything about the jewelry case.
It was only as a consequence of the M-DSPD internal affairs investigation that “why” they may not have known came to light.
Martin Clan 2
On October 21st 2011 a burglary took place a few blocks from Krop Senior High School where Trayvon Martin attended. The stolen property outlined in the Miami-Dade Police Report (PD111021-422483) matches the descriptive presented by SRO Dunn in his School Police report 2011-11477.
However, there was ONE big issue. SRO Dunn never filed a criminal report, nor opened a criminal investigation, surrounding the stolen jewelry. Instead, and as a result of pressure from M-DSPD Chief Hurley to avoid criminal reports for black male students, Dunn wrote up the jewelry as “found items”, and transferred them, along with the burglary tool, to the Miami-Dade Police property room where they sat on a shelf unassigned to anyone for investigation.
A separate report of “criminal Mischief” (T-08809) was filed for the additional issue of writing “WTF” on a school locker. [It was the search for the marker used to write the graffiti that led to the backpack search].
The school discipline, “suspension”, was attached to the graffiti and not the stolen jewelry.
oCTOBER 2011 - 1
The connections between the Police Burglary report and the School Report of “found items” were never made because the regular police detective in charge of the Burglary case had no idea the School Police Dept. had filed a “found items” report.
Two differing police departments, and the School Officer, Dunn, intentionally took the criminal element out of the equation – instead preferring “school discipline” and not “criminal adjudication”.
It was only when the M-DSPD Internal Affairs investigation kicked in, and six officers gave sworn affidavits, the manipulative scheme to improve criminal statistics within the School System were identified openly.
School Superintendent Alberto Carvalho gave his hire, Police Chief Hurley, instructions to reduce the criminal behavior of young black males. The chosen strategy between them, to insure optical success, was to stop using the Criminal Justice System to punish black student behavior. Instead they instructed the School Resource Officers to use school discipline in place of criminal justice.
Another approach was the use of The Baker Act, to quantify behaviors under health HIPPA law secrecy by assigning the students with psychological problems. This allowed them to again use school discipline and work around criminal reports.
Without the reports, the statistics would improve immensely;  And improve they did.
M-DSPD Media Advisory - Copy
The final approach, to insure no-one would find out about the manipulation, was to change the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for inter-agency information sharing.
This new SOP was outlined by a communications directive in 2010 forbidding the sharing of Miami-Dade School Police reports to outside agencies without redaction. Officers had to send any and all requests through the public information officer.
Hence, the furor of Chief Hurley when the Robles article hit the press and cited police reports – Hurley smelled a leaker and launched an investigation.
Ultimately the internal affairs investigation initiated by Hurley led to his own firing, because the officers questioned told the internal affairs investigators the truth of what was going on and outed the scheme.
One of the examples of this in action was the jewelry incident and Trayvon Martin – as accidentally outlined in the Herald report. But the Herald never knew their reporting had launched an internal affairs investigation which led to the collapse of the scheme.
Meanwhile the stolen jewelry from the burglary (PD111021-422483) was sitting on a shelf in the Property Room listed as (2011-11477 “found items) gathering dust.
Until we started digging, and the FOIA requests revealed not only the scheme, but the fact a victim was never made whole with the return of their items.
That is, until now. Keep reading

 

 

 

M-DSPD Cover Up – The Curious Case Of Trayvon Martin’s Backpack With Stolen Jewelry and Burglary Tool…

Frances Robles - legal collectionIronically were it not for Frances Robles writing a Miami Herald article on March 26th 2012 an entire chain of events would not have taken place.
It was that Robles article, and the outlining of the Miami-Dade School Police Department’s report on a Trayvon Martin incident from October 2011, that kicked off an internal investigation by M-DSPD Police Chief Hurley against his own officers to find out who leaked the police report.
[Note: The Miami-Dade Public School System has its own Police force, and Chief, who report to the School Board and Superintendent - Not the Police Dept. The Police Chief is appointed by the School Superintendent, in this example, Alberto Carvalho]
October 2011
It was that M-DSPD internal affairs investigation which revealed in October 2011 Trayvon Martin was searched by School Resource Officer, Darryl Dunn. The search of Trayvon Martin’s backpack turned up at least 12 pcs of ladies jewelry, and a man’s watch, in addition to a flat head screwdriver described as “a burglary tool”.
When Trayvon was questioned about who owned the jewelry and where it came from, he claimed he was just holding it for a “friend”. A “friend” he would not name.
Later, after the police report was outlined in the Robles article, and despite Trayvon being suspended for the second time in a new school year, Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, said Trayvon’s dad, Tracy Martin, and Trayvon’s mom, Sybrina Fulton, did not know anything about the jewelry case.
It was only as a consequence of the M-DSPD internal affairs investigation that “why” they may not have known came to light.
Martin Clan 2
On October 21st 2011 a burglary took place a few blocks from Krop Senior High School where Trayvon Martin attended. The stolen property outlined in the Miami-Dade Police Report (PD111021-422483) matches the descriptive presented by SRO Dunn in his School Police report 2011-11477.
Trayvon Martin
Trayvon Martin
However, there was ONE big issue. SRO Dunn never filed a criminal report, nor opened a criminal investigation, surrounding the stolen jewelry. Instead, and as a result of pressure from M-DSPD Chief Hurley to avoid criminal reports for black male students, Dunn wrote up the jewelry as “found items”, and transferred them, along with the burglary tool, to the Miami-Dade Police property room where they sat on a shelf unassigned to anyone for investigation.
A separate report of “criminal Mischief” (T-08809) was filed for the additional issue of writing “WTF” on a school locker. [It was the search for the marker used to write the graffiti that led to the backpack search].
The school discipline, “suspension”, was attached to the graffiti and not the stolen jewelry.
oCTOBER 2011 - 1
The connections between the Police Burglary report and the School Report of “found items” were never made because the regular police detective in charge of the Burglary case had no idea the School Police Dept. had filed a “found items” report.
Two differing police departments, and the School Officer, Dunn, intentionally took the criminal element out of the equation – instead preferring “school discipline” and not “criminal adjudication”.
It was only when the M-DSPD Internal Affairs investigation kicked in, and six officers gave sworn affidavits, the manipulative scheme to improve criminal statistics within the School System were identified openly.
School Superintendent Alberto Carvalho gave his hire, Police Chief Hurley, instructions to reduce the criminal behavior of young black males. The chosen strategy between them, to insure optical success, was to stop using the Criminal Justice System to punish black student behavior. Instead they instructed the School Resource Officers to use school discipline in place of criminal justice.
Charles+Hurley+Mass+Held+Commemorating+Sept+lmV8IXDVXZ-l
Former M-DSPD Police Chief Hurley with son and wife
Another approach was the use of The Baker Act, to quantify behaviors under health HIPPA law secrecy by assigning the students with psychological problems. This allowed them to again use school discipline and work around criminal reports.
Without the reports, the statistics would improve immensely;  And improve they did.
M-DSPD Media Advisory - Copy
The final approach, to insure no-one would find out about the manipulation, was to change the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for inter-agency information sharing.
This new SOP was outlined by a communications directive in 2010 forbidding the sharing of Miami-Dade School Police reports to outside agencies without redaction. Officers had to send any and all requests through the public information officer.
Hence, the furor of Chief Hurley when the Robles article hit the press and cited police reports – Hurley smelled a leaker and launched an investigation.
Ultimately the internal affairs investigation initiated by Hurley led to his own firing, because the officers questioned told the internal affairs investigators the truth of what was going on and outed the scheme.
One of the examples of this in action was the jewelry incident and Trayvon Martin – as accidentally outlined in the Herald report. But the Herald never knew their reporting had launched an internal affairs investigation which led to the collapse of the scheme.
Meanwhile the stolen jewelry from the burglary (PD111021-422483) was sitting on a shelf in the Property Room listed as (2011-11477 “found items) gathering dust.
Until we started digging, and the FOIA requests revealed not only the scheme, but the fact a victim was never made whole with the return of their items.
That is, until now.
Yesterday we contacted Detective Manresa, assigned to the burglary case, of the Miami-Dade Police Department to notify him some of his victims’ stolen items were actually in the Miami-Dade property room:
Subject: Attn: Detective Omar Manresa [RE: PD111021-422483 Burglary at XXXX XX XXXXX]
Dear Detective Manresa,
Per phone conversation of 4/30/13 @ 10:20am regarding burglary incident #PD111021-422483
During the course of research surrounding an internal affairs M-DSPD investigation in March/April of 2012 it coincidentally came to our attention that School Resource Officer Darryl Dunn (Dr. Krop Senior High School) filled out a report of items from a student’s backpack without criminal attachment.
The internal documentation used by SRO Dunn only listed the contents of the backpack as “found items” and a burglary tool. He was trying to avoid subjecting the student [Trayvon Martin] to a criminal investigation, therefore no criminal report, nor investigation was initiated.
This action by SRO Dunn was taken at the direction and request of former M-DSPD Police Chief Hurley who had advised his officers to avoid writing criminal reports on student offenders; Apparently in an attempt to artificially improve the recorded criminal student statistics.
The internal report #2011-11477 never attached the stolen property to the student who was carrying it when searched. The property was taken to the custody of Carmen Gonzalez, Property Specialist, where it was held, and still should be located.
The details surrounding this event are outlined in the following sworn affidavits completed by members of the Miami-Dade School Police Department. (they are extensive)
As mentioned, if you contact the victim of Miami-Dade burglary #PD111021-422483, and review with them the property confiscated by M-DSPD SRO Dunn listed under #2011-11477, we believe you will be able to return at least a portion of the stolen merchandise.
Perhaps some of the items returned may have sentimental, as well as obvious financial, value.

Right is Right Even If Nobody Does it; and Wrong is Wrong, even if Everybody Does it…

Martin Clan

Corsi & FBI Ready to File Criminal Charges Against Barack Obama

1
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H-1
2
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H-2
3
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H-3
4
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H
You may recall that Barack Obama's COLB "birth certificates" released in 2008 were proven to be forgeries. After spending over $2 million to hide his birth certificate ostensibly existing in Hawaii (which the Governor was unable to find), a new forgery mysteriously was presented by Obama from the White House to try to make the issue go away. This was rapidly dissected by graphics experts and revealed to be yet another forgery, only even more dismal than the 2008 versions.
Evidently a coverup has also been in progress in Kenya, where the government has discovered criminal tampering with the birth records there.
Now criminal charges are being prepared in the United States to be filed against Barack Obama for his role in these events, described in these videos.

==============================

ALSO SEE:

http://www.archive.org/details/Demonstration-ObamaswhiteHouseIssueBirthCertificateABlatantForgery
http://www.archive.org/details/WashingtonTimes-NewlyReleasedObamaBirthCertificateForgery
http://www.archive.org/details/ElectionsOfficialAdamsAffidavitAttestingNoHawaiiBirthRecordForObama
http://www.archive.org/details/BarackObama-BornInKenya-TheDocumentary

http://www.archive.org/details/P.i.SusanDanielsInterviewAboutObamasIdentityFraud


SCROLL down a bit for a very useful collection of relevant PDF files you can download.

===============================
FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


This movie is part of the collection: Community Video

Audio/Visual: sound, color
Keywords: obama; CIA; family; SSN; FOX; o'reilly; analysis; felony; douglas vogt; expert; kerning; scrubbed; unscrubbed; taitz; interview; 2012 elections; 2012; 2008; 2011; investigative; social security; addresses; properties; fraud; false identities; numbers; social security numbers; private investigator; anne soetoro; anne dunham; stanley ann dunham; soetoro; barack obama; barack h. obama; barack hussein obama; records; documents; FBI; anne dunham; stanley dunham; barry soetoro; jones; alex jones; prison planet; african; kenyan; susan daniels; news; discovery; white house; impeachment; impeach; removal; election; presidency; politics; coverup; archive; madsen; investigation; report; pakistan; mujahideen; ASTRUE; Jean Ludwig; TAITZ; Jean Paul Ludwig; Social Security; Corsi; where's the birth certificate; FBI; fraud; book; Afghanistan; russia; terrorism; al qaeda; taliban

Individual Files

Movie Files Flash Video Ogg Video 512Kb MPEG4
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H-1 35.5 MB
65.6 MB
64.1 MB
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H-2 33.8 MB
62.1 MB
61.5 MB
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H-3 11.9 MB
22.0 MB
21.6 MB
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H 28.9 MB
53.5 MB
52.6 MB
Image Files Thumbnail Animated GIF JPEG
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H-1 6.5 KB
223.4 KB
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H-2 7.1 KB
419.5 KB
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H-3 7.0 KB
142.4 KB
Jerome Corsi_ Corsi To File Criminal Charges Against White H 5.5 KB
346.4 KB
ObamaBornKenya Kenya Parliament 356.2 KB
Information FormatSize
CorsiFbiReadyToFileCriminalChargesAgainstBarackObama_files.xml Metadata [file]
CorsiFbiReadyToFileCriminalChargesAgainstBarackObama_meta.xml Metadata 3.9 KB
Other Files Image Container PDF Text PDF
52790199-Adjacent-SSN-to-Obama.pdf 742.8 KB
52790947-Social-Security-Number-Verification-System.pdf 352.7 KB
52790999-Social-Security-Number-Verifier.pdf 208.4 KB
52844374-People-Search-105-Records-for-Barack-Hussein-Obama.pdf 3.1 MB
Barack Obama II Kenyan Birth Certificate and Fed Court Affidavit 786.4 KB
Birth Certificate Fake Prompts White House Counsel Resignation 224.9 KB
Did Barack Obama Falsify Selective Service Registration 438.6 KB
False FOX Excuse On Obama SSN Scrubbed after OReilly Exposed 233.4 KB
From A to Z - Whats wrong with Obama's Birth Certificate 1.2 MB
Kenya Assembly Discusses Obama Kenyan Born p31 531.4 KB
Kenya investigated Obama African Birth 485.1 KB
Kenyan-Government-Documents-Related-to-Investigation-of-Obama-Kenyan-Birth.pdf 283.4 KB
Member of Kenya Parliament Admits Obama Kenya Born 1.2 MB
News-Release-Expanded-Analysis-of-Obama’s-Certificate-of-Live-Birth-May-22-2011 1.2 MB
Obama Caught in Birth Certificate Forgery Sting 633.7 KB
Obama Ineligibility to be President - Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice 176.3 KB
Whose-SSN-is-President-Barack-Hussein-Soetoro-Obama-Using-Wash-Times-Natl-Wkly-11-Apr-2011-pg-5.pdf 1.2 MB
Whose Social Security Number is Obama Using - Not His Own 209.1 KB

Be the first to write a review
Downloaded 465 times
Reviews


Obama administration releases final rules on contraception mandate for religious organizations

The Obama administration released its final rules Friday on the religious exemption from the contraception coverage requirement under Obamacare.
Under the final rule, houses of worship are exempt from the mandate requiring their health plans cover birth control for their female employees and dependents.
The final rule lays out an accommodation of other religious nonprofit organizations such as hospitals and schools that object to providing contraception.
Under the accommodation the religious nonprofits may tell their insurance provider they object and the insurance provider may provide contraception coverage separately to the women at no charge.
“Today’s announcement reinforces our commitment to respect the concerns of houses of worship and other non-profit religious organizations that object to contraceptive coverage, while helping to ensure that women get the care they need, regardless of where they work,” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement.
One of the major critics of the mandate was quick to rebuke the final rule, saying that they will have to decide the issue in court.
“Unfortunately the final rule announced today is the same old, same old. As we said when the proposed rule was issued, this doesn’t solve the religious conscience problem because it still makes our non-profit clients the gatekeepers to abortion and provides no protection to religious businesses,” Eric Rassbach, deputy general counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, said in a statement. “The easy way to resolve this would have been to exempt sincere religious employers completely, as the Constitution requires.”
Planned Parenthood cheered the final rule.
“This means that women will have access to birth control at no cost, no matter where they work. This is a historic moment for women’s health and economic security,” Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards said in a statement. “Birth control is basic health care for women, and this policy treats it like any other kind of preventive care. Throughout history, birth control has had a transformative impact on women’s health, education, and economic opportunities, and this policy expands access to birth control like never before.”
The contraception mandate in Obamacare has already been the subject of a number lawsuits from religious organizations that see compliance with the mandate as violating their religious beliefs.
The Becket Fund has represented many groups in lawsuits against the regulation including the Hobby Lobby, which Thursday scored a victory when a federal appeals court ruled that the craft business would not have to start paying fines for failing complying with the mandate as their case moves forward.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/06/28/obama-administration-releases-final-rules-on-contraception-mandate-for-religious-organizations/#ixzz2XiGnmAba

Is ‘Organizing for Action’ in violation of IRS Code and E.O. 13490?

By SUA Staff – Pay to play! It will only cost you $500,000 for a single visit with Obama – smell test anyone? The ‘most transparent administration ever’ has another smudge on the glass it appears.
By now, its almost a running joke, or better yet, a trail of constant obfuscation, applying new meanings to words, selective enforcement of law, suing rivals and sovereign states, outright lying, and so many more examples of the reign of a despot rather than Presidency of the United States.
Presidential fiat rules the day and unfortunately we are becoming desensitized to it. Executive Orders and the blame game, end-runs around Congress, and now, possibly even conflicting with IRS Code. Oops, did they just conflict with their own rules?
The transformation of the reelection campaign to a 501(c)4 may just prove to be illegal. In fact, one of his own Executive Orders may seal their fate, but more likely, people will just look the other way.
There appears to be nothing they will not say or do to ‘transform’ America. Please read the story below, but first, read Executive Order 13490 from January 21, 2009. Here are a few snippets to ponder as you review the story below it:
  • Lobbyist Gift Ban.  I will not accept gifts from registered lobbyists or lobbying organizations for the duration of my service as an appointee.
    Senior White House Adviser David Axelrod, left, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, leave with President Barack Obama, not shown, from the White House in Washington, Tuesday, Aug. 11, 2009, for a trip to New Hampshire to hold a town hall meeting. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
  • Revolving Door Ban – All Appointees Entering Government.  I will not for a period of 2 years from the date of my appointment participate in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my former employer or former clients, including regulations and contracts. 
  • Revolving Door Ban – Appointees Leaving Government.  If, upon my departure from the Government, I am covered by the post-employment restrictions on communicating with employees of my former executive agency set forth in section 207(c) of title 18, United States Code, I agree that I will abide by those restrictions for a period of 2 years following the end of my appointment. (Read the whole E.O. here.)
Also remember that David Axelrod has now joined the NBC family – another lobbying vantage point for the Obama Agenda. He joins former Press Secretary Robert Gibbs there. Now they have a lobbying team for all of America – the main stream media and Organizing for America. (Now called Organizing for Action.)
The question also to ask is, who is working for that new team that was employed by the campaign, and/or the administration? Additionally – we may need some legal definitions – Is the new group another Media Matters fiasco of a sham; a not-for-profit with tax exempt status that is actually an advocacy group for a specific candidate and agenda of a sitting politician?
Here is the link to the United States Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 501(c). Dull reading, but worth the effort.

White House denies claims that a $500,000 donation ‘buys’ face time with the president

  • It was reported over the weekend that donors who gave more than $500K to Organizing for America would be invited to quarterly meeting with the president
  • Press Secretary Jay Carney did not dispute claims and said there was nothing unusual about Obama meeting with donors
By BETH STEBNER - UK Daily Mail
The White House defended itself today after suggestions that high-dollar donors to President Obama’s new non-profit advocacy group would ‘buy’ face time with the Commander-In-Chief.
Pay to play? Mr Obama, pictured today speaking to the National Governors Association; the White House today defended itself after suggestions that high-dollar donors to his non-profit advocacy group would buy face time.
Organizing for Action, which is set up to be a social welfare organization, will allow large donations not unlike Super-PAC contributions, to be given to aid Mr Obama in carrying out second-term goals such as climate change and gun control.
There have been reports that those who contributed more than $500,000 to his cause would be invited to quarterly meetings with the president in a pay-to-play.
However, White House press secretary Jay Carney did not specifically dispute the claims, saying only that there was nothing new and unusual about Mr Obama meeting with people and groups who support his political agenda. 
He said today: ‘It has been organized to rally support for the president’s policy agenda, but is a separate organization.

Administrative officials routinely interact with outside advocacy organizations, and this has been true in prior administrations.’
An article appearing in the New York Times originally reported the benchmark funding over the weekend.

Mr Carney told reporters today that administration officials may attend events for OFA, but won’t be raising money.
The group, which is a spinoff of the president’s re-election group ‘Obama for America,’ has said its purpose is to rally support for Mr Obama’s policy agenda – not to support or oppose candidates. 
It’s accepting unlimited personal and corporate donations, but plans to disclose its donors.
According to the Times, the non-profit will accept unlimited donations from both personal and corporate coffers. 
Those who donate more than half a million to the OFA will be invited to the nonprofit’s ‘national advisory board,’ giving the donors access to quarterly meetings with the president as well as other White House events.
Jon Carson, the executive director of the OFA and former director of the White House office of public engagement, told the Times on Saturday that the group’s goal is to ‘change the conventional wisdom’ on hot-button issues like gun control and climate change. 
The organization’s modus operandi is not unlike those of Super PAC, which until early 2012, the president called a ‘threat to democracy.’
The OFA site reads that it exists to help President Obama in the ‘achieving enactment of the national agenda.’ As such, it operates as a 501(c)(4) of the IRS.