Wednesday, May 13, 2015

ARGE HADRON COLLIDER (LHC) captures incredibly rare particle

ARGE HADRON COLLIDER (LHC) captures incredibly rare particle decay for the first time. Experts say findings will help guide the quest to explain what physics cannot.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             For the first time, scientists at CERN have observed extremely rare leftovers from subatomic particles. The observations support a fundamental theory of particle physics, according to a paper published today in the journal Nature. It's hoped that the research will help guide future investigations into dark matter and other phenomena that the Standard Model of particle physics cannot explain. The findings are based on data collected between 2011 and 2012 at CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland.                                                                                                                                                                                      

A Big Problem Is Brewing Behind “The Scenes:” Pentagon Admits To Prepping For Mass Civil Unrest

A Big Problem Is Brewing Behind “The Scenes:” Pentagon Admits To Prepping For Mass Civil Unrest

It’s unfortunate that the majority of people in the United States refuse to accept anything that’s not spoon-fed to them by the mainstream media or admitted “trustful” by politicians and business elitists.  But the sign-posts of collapse are planted everywhere for anyone willing to put forth the effort to read them.  I have not fully decided if the mass-engendered impulse to ignore reality is a product of sheer stupidity, slothful ignorance or willful denial.
Most people have chosen either to overlook the Jade Helm 15 exercises which “officially” begin next month and run through mid-September.  Of course, there are been thousands of reports of ongoing military exercises and mass military equipment movement via rail from many States, including here in Colorado.  The mainstream media is fueling the public’s determined ignorance about Jade Helm by not reporting the event, for the most part.
However, now it has been reported that Department of Defense officials are now admitting that the Pentagon has been preparing for mass civil unrest:
A new US Department of Defense (DoD) research program admits that the Pentagon has long been concerned about widespread social break down. Even more striking of an admission is the fact that they have been funding universities to create models of the dynamics, risks and tipping points that would all be part of large-scale civil unrest in the United States.
You can read the details here:   Pentagon Admits They Are Preparing For Mass Civil Breakdown
The article references source material, so it would be impossible to impose skepticism on the evidence.   Anyone denying this reality is therefore hopelessly stupid or tragically naive.
I will have more on this later, but many have noticed some isolated events which indicate the global bond markets may be experiencing pre-collapse tremors.  A bond market selling avalanche is the worst nightmare of the Central Banks.
Many analysts have been pointing to September as the time period when the real brown stuff begins to hit the fan.  There are several possible trigger events, including the possible de-linking of the yuan from the dollar by China.   Perhaps it is no coincidence the official Jade Helm exercises have been timed to end on September 15…


Arnold Wolf, 1924-2008

On Tuesday, December 23, one of Hyde Park’s towering figures, Arnold Jacob Wolf, Rabbi Emeritus of temple K. A. M. Isaiah Israel, died, apparently of a heart attack, at the age of eighty-four. Arnold, however, was only one year into his adulthood, since (raised at a time when Reform Jews did not approve of the bar mitzvah) he had just celebrated his own coming-of-age, his bar mitzvah, at the age of eighty-three.And this was emblematic of Arnold’s later years. “Life begins at seventy,” he used to say, and indeed he seemed to become more joyful, more free of stress and inner tension, as the years went by.
It’s difficult to capture Arnold in words, because the reality was so much larger, so much funnier, so much more improbable, than any fiction could be, even one written by a writer far more gifted than I.Still, to try to put him before people who didn’t know him, and to remind those who did know him of what they loved and lost in him, seems like something that has to be tried.
If you saw Arnold for the first time, you might think you were looking at one of those trolls of middle-European fairy tales, a short, round, white-bearded Rumplestilkstin whose gruff, almost snarling voice seemed suited to a character of that cantankerous sort. But whereas Rumplestiltskin, consumed by dislike and envy, had, I imagine, dull guarded eyes, Arnold’s sparkled, and you could see in them such variegated colors of love, for all the people, young and old, whom he reproved, chastised, and even mocked. (“Religion is a serious business,” he would say, “but this congregation is a joke.”) Rabbi Eugene Borowitz, his contemporary, said at the funeral that Arnold was first and foremost a lover – and then he added, “To love Jews is no small accomplishment.”You saw that accomplishment in the eyes first, because it consisted above all in a willingness to see the other person as the person was, and, at the same time, in a willingness to be seen, faults and all. There was no critique of Arnold that he did not make first and most trenchantly himself.
Arnold thought a rabbi ought to “comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable” – as another rabbi and close friend put it at the funeral. A lot of his “afflicting” was political. Reform Judaism has always stood for the idea that the moral law is the core of Judaism and that its imperative to pursue social justice is Judaism’s central commandment. Fine ideas, increasingly paid mere lip service as Jews have become contented, prosperous, middle-class insiders. For Arnold, however, these ideas were intimate parts of his daily thought, and imperatives to a life of social action. He marched with Dr. King. A decorated veteran of the Korean War, he crusaded against the Vietnam War. He supported the career of Mayor Harold Washington. At the end of his life, he campaigned for Barack Obama, and Obama’s victory brought him a new sense of optimism. (The President-Elect wrote a lovely statement about him that was read at the funeral.) Long before such ideas were more than pipe dreams, he supported a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine, and he represented the Meretz Party in the World Congress of Judaism. In his essay, “A Theology of Activism,” he writes:
I believe that Judaism mandates a quite specific political ethic which is binding upon all Jews. I include among our political obligations the amelioration of inequality, offering sanctuary to those fleeing oppression and tyranny, and a perpetual struggle for peace, even at some risk to our own security and safety…[T]he positive commandment of Judaism is to begin to act again and again, in the face of all doubt and with due consideration of all that negative experience can teach…God will complete our imperfections. She will not forgive our self-defensive cowardice or our fear of failure.
Arnold was one of the least cowardly people I’ve ever known.
Arnold was opinionated, and he had definite views about the concrete political choices that his general view entailed. Above all, though, he wanted others to search out the conclusions for themselves, to give up the comfort of tradition and ask how things really are, to dissent, to object. To argue with life on behalf of life.
Arnold was shocking. His gruffness scared both children and adults. And yet he was a superb teacher, if you hung in there. With the bar and bat mitzvah classes, he challenged those twelve-year-olds to stop their giggling and their self-defensive reticence, to come up with a view, with anything that was real.He afflicted them, and he was perfectly willing to be afflicted in return. I remember hearing a young teen activist for lesbian and gay youth light into him for his somewhat conservative views on gender and same-sex marriage, and the frankness of the exchange showed how Arnold had offered himself to those kids as a vulnerable equal, rather than lording it over them.
Last summer Arnold told me a story about the great Jewish philosopher Martin Buber that also stands for Arnold as a teacher. Arnold had taken his two young sons, ages seven and nine, to Israel, and they met the great man. Instead of holding forth, Buber asked the kids, “What do you want to know?” They said that they would really like to understand how the telephones worked in Israel. Buber spent an hour telling them all about the details of the telephone system. That was how Arnold, too, found the person where the person was, and honored any passion that brought that person into conversation.
All the obituaries of Arnold speak of him as a crusader for social justice, and this is true, as I’ve said. In his later years, however, Arnold even argued with the Reform tradition and its emphasis on the supremacy of politics. More theologically driven than many Reform rabbis, he became more and more focused on spiritual matters. So just when you thought you were learning what he was about, he was already moving on, in search of elusive truths. Once, invited by an editor to spell out my own religious views, I wrote an article about the classical Reform tradition and its Kantian notion of a rational religion dedicated to the moral law; I tried to show why this tradition was so attractive to me. Of course I sent it to Arnold for comments. When I got home the next day, there was a message on my answering machine in that inimitable voice: “You know what the trouble is with you? You’re a god-damn Reform Jew.” But at my own bat mitzvah in 2008 (how lucky I was to have his blessing, so shortly before his death), he spoke of a reconciliation between Athens and Jerusalem, between moral reason and religious insight, so perhaps he had found a way to that harmony in his own spirit. Certainly he had never seemed more serene, more delighted with life, than in those days.
Here are two stories about Arnold that seem contradictory. In his bar and bat mitzvah classes, whenever kids would complain about something, he would say, “It’s not about you.” And yet, in his Torah study sessions with fellow rabbis, so one reported at his funeral, he frequently said to people, “It’s always about your own life.”    Was he just inconsistent? I think we can put those two stories together, if we think that in a deep sense one’s own life is not about oneself. Arnold believed in introspection. (He was a lifelong advocate of psychoanalysis, and in later years became a board member of the Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis.) He did want people to let the text summon them to deeper self-knowledge. But in the end, any self-knowledge worth the name tells you that your life is not about you, it is about action directed at the good of others. To self-involved teens, he emphasized the focus on the other; to intellectualizing rabbis, the need for personal self-examination.But the message in the end is the same: know yourself so that you can serve justice and promote peace.
Arnold was a man of Hyde Park in the deepest sense. He engaged with the needs of the community, and he cared about what happened everywhere. “We cannot be invulnerable surrounded by vulnerability,” he wrote. “Our role is in the city and not away from it.” This would at one time have set him at odds with the University of Chicago, which used to understand its mission in detached ivory-tower terms and to conceive of the surrounding neighborhoods as dangers to be kept at bay, rather than as partners in a search for justice and truth. Today, a more open and vulnerable spirit has come to prevail in our University, and Arnold must have taken special pleasure in seeing how the University was accepting its own partnership in and responsibility to our community, with its mixed income levels, its mixture of races and religions, and its unequal levels of opportunity and possibility.
At one time, Arnold wanted to be a professor: he had all but enrolled in our University’s graduate program in Egyptology. What turned him away, he told me, was his psychiatrist’s observation that he had gifts for reaching people that he would not use fully in that sort of life. So Arnold knew and valued the academic life. He read voraciously, you could talk to him about almost any topic, his office contained a glorious library. What, however, does his life say to those of us here in the University who have made the academic choice?
On the one hand, there was much in Arnold’s life that fits very well with the ethos of the University of Chicago: a passion for challenge and argument, a love of the search for truth whatever its inconveniences, a profound respect for dissenting opinions. All these virtues are part of our tradition, and they are especially honored, perhaps, in our Law School, so it seemed just natural for Arnold to turn up here, as he once did to debate same-sex marriage (with that same teen activist as one of his opponents on the panel).
But there is something else in the history of this University that does not sit well with Arnold’s life: a kind of superiority about knowledge, a feeling that having digested “the great books” made you better than other people, a sort of cultivated smugness. All that stuff (fortunately not on display in our Law School) Arnold would and did see through in an instant, and he always preferred the honest groping questions of a twelve-year-old to the self-defensive pontificating of a self-appointed big shot. That sort of teaching and learning has death written all over it, and Arnold was always on the side of life, with all its suffering and inconvenience.
That, I think, is the way his life challenges all of us in the academy: to be out there, to stand for something you care about, to forget abut how learning creates a hierarchy of egos, and, instead, to find ways to make your learning serve life, justice, and truth.

Another Warning… Obama Administration Won’t Rule Out Firing on Israeli Jets If Iran Is Attacked

Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, April 22, 2010, 5:22 AM


Another Warning… Obama Administration Won’t Rule Out Firing on Israeli Jets If Iran Is Attacked

The Obama Administration sends out another warning… To Israel.
obama israel
Demonstrators in Israel protest Barack Obama.
The Obama Administration won’t rule out firing on Israeli jets if Iran is attacked by Israel.
The Danger Room reported, via Mere Rhetoric:
America’s top military officer wouldn’t rule the possibility today of U.S. forces firing on Israeli jets, if Israel launched a pre-emptive strike on Iran.
In a town hall on the campus of the University of West Virginia, a young Air Force ROTC cadet asked Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen to respond to a “rumor.” If Israel decided to attack Iran, the speculation went, those jet would need to fly through Iraqi airspace to reach their targets. That airspace is considered a “no-fly” zone by the American military. So might U.S. troops shoot down the Israeli jets, the airmen asked the chairman, if they breached that airspace?
Mullen tried to sidestep the question. “We have an exceptionally strong relationship with Israel. I’ve spent a lot of time with my counterpart in Israel. So we also have a very clear understanding of where we are. And beyond that, I just wouldn’t get into the speculation of what might happen and who might do what. I don’t think it serves a purpose, frankly,” he said. “I am hopeful that this will be resolved in a way where we never have to answer a question like that.”
This isn’t the first time we’ve heard this.
In September 2009, Zbigniew Brzezinski, former foreign adviser to US president Jimmy Carter and current advisor to Barack Obama, called for the US to shoot down Israeli jets.

obama had him killed to shut him up and stop people from knowing the truth about obama and the jews

Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, 1924-2008 -- "Jews don't read ...
Dec 24, 2008 - Arnold Jacob Wolf, our rabbi, teacher, and friend, died on Tuesday in Hyde Park, suddenly and unexpectedly, at 84. His memory will be for a ..

The Chicago Jewish News: Obama and the Jews

The Chicago Jewish News:
Obama and the Jews

Pauline Dubkin Yearwood
The Chicago Jewish News
October 24, 2008
cover image of Barack Obama at the Wailing Wall
Cover artwork from The Chicago Jewish News
OBAMA AND THE JEWS: A look at why some Jews love him and some don't trust him; and at the key role Chicago Jews played in getting him to where he is
Abner Mikva, the former Chicago congressman, federal judge and White House counsel to President Bill Clinton, puts a 21st-century twist on the notion that Clinton was "the nation's first black president."
"I think when this is all over, people are going to say that Barack Obama is the first Jewish president," he said.
Mikva, a powerful figure in local and national Democratic politics for decades, was one of Sen. Obama's early admirers, beginning in 1990 when he tried to hire the brilliant student and first black president of the Harvard Law Review for a coveted clerkship. (Obama turned him down, saying he was going to move to Chicago and run for public office. "I thought that showed a lot of chutzpah on his part," Mikva says with a laugh.)
Abner Mikva
Abner Mikva
Since then, Mikva's support for and nurturance of the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee has never wavered. He is one of many influential Chicago Jews who have been among Obama's earliest and most ardent backers.
One longtime Jewish observer of the political scene, who did not want to be identified, said admiringly that "Jews made him. Wherever you look, there is a Jewish presence."
Yet outside of Chicago, there has been a significant amount of Jewish resistance to Obama's candidacy, although that may be lessening with Sen. Hillary Clinton, a favorite among Jews, out of the picture.
The Jewish community has been a particular target of e-mails declaring Obama a secret Muslim who attended a madrassa in Indonesia, took his Senate oath of office by swearing on a Quran, and is aligned with Muslim terrorists. Those allegations have been thoroughly disproven by mainstream media and other sources. But even aside from the crackpot right, there is still distrust of the Illinois senator from some Jewish quarters, much of it centering on Israel and on some former and current advisors who are perceived to be unfriendly to the Jewish state.
Joel Sprayregen
Joel Sprayregen
Typical of the naysayers is Joel Sprayregen, a Chicago attorney who is a former chair of the Jewish Community Relations Council and a current member of the executive committee of JINSA, the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs.
"My skepticism about Obama derives from both his lack of experience and his alignment up to recently with the far left," Sprayregen said while acknowledging that the candidate "has moved more to the center once he secured the nomination."
Sprayregen believes that "a number" of Obama's foreign policy advisors "have views which would jeopardize American national security. His association with left-wing views and advisors gives me apprehension as to how firm his support for Israel would be in a crisis," he said.
Obama is "baffled" by the resistance to him from some Jews, a key advisor, former California Rep. Mel Levine, said recently, and has stepped up outreach efforts to the Jewish community, including making a well-publicized trip to Israel earlier this summer, his second visit to the Jewish state. Washington correspondent James Besser, writing in The New York Jewish Week, declares that the senator "is acting as if Jews hold the keys to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue."
In a way, they do. "The Jewish vote is important because of the states (Jews) are in," Paul Green, a Roosevelt University professor and longtime political maven, said. While Jews make up only about three percent of the national voting public, they vote in greater proportion to their numbers than almost any other group and are gathered in key states, particularly Florida, a swing state with 27 electoral votes, he said.
"That's the most interesting and important. The Jewish vote will matter the most there," Green said. "New York, Illinois, California - they'll go for Obama. But my guess is right now he has some work do with (Jews in) South Florida."
Levine, the Obama advisor, says that more than anything, the nominee-to-be "wants people to realize what his record is and his closeness to the Jewish community in Chicago."
That closeness can hardly be exaggerated.

Obama's Chicago Jewish roots

"Some of my earliest and most ardent supporters came from the Jewish community in Chicago," Obama told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency in 2004, just after his keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention had galvanized the party and made his name a household word overnight.
That was not hyperbole.
Newton Minow
Newton Minow
Typical Obama first came to Chicago in 1985, after he graduated from Columbia University, and spent three years in the city as a community organizer. In 1988, he left for Harvard Law School, and in the same year met Newton Minow, a Jew and a longtime Democratic powerbroker who served as chairman of the Federal Communications Commission under President John F. Kennedy. He is currently senior counsel at the Loop law firm of Sidley Austin.
Minow's daughter Martha ("She's not just Jewish, she's very very Jewish," her father said) was a professor at Harvard Law School at the time. "She called me in 1988 to say that the best student she ever had wanted to spend the summer in Chicago and she wanted me to meet him," Minow relates. "I said what's his name, and when she said 'Barack Obama,' I said, you gotta spell that."
Minow asked a partner in his firm to look up Obama when he visited the law school. "He started to laugh," Minow said. "He said, we hired him already."
Obama worked at Sidley Austin as an intern that summer; the firm is where he met attorney Michelle Robinson, and they married in 1992. Minow later offered him a second internship followed by a permanent job, but Obama turned it down because, he said, he was planning to go into public service or politics.
Minow and his wife have remained friends with the couple and supporters of Obama's political career. "We introduced him to a lot of our friends and held fund-raisers for him," Minow said. "We find him to be truly outstanding. If you just look around, you can see he's got many many Jewish friends. He is very much at home with Jewish people, their values and interests."
He believes that many in the Jewish community supported Clinton over Obama because "they didn't know Barack Obama. They were not informed about him. They had a loyalty over the years to the Clintons. It's not that they were negative about Barack; they were just committed elsewhere."
Minow continues to actively support Obama's candidacy; a nephew serves as one of his speechwriters.
In Chicago, meanwhile, the Obamas settled in Hyde Park and Obama became a popular lecturer at the University of Chicago law school. Abner Mikva, whom Obama already knew from Washington, also taught there, and the two renewed their acquaintance and became close. "We would have lunch and breakfast together and talk about a lot of things, different issues," Mikva said.
Through Project Vote, a voter registration drive that Obama worked on in 1992, he met two key future supporters, both Jewish. One was David Axelrod, a former Chicago Tribune reporter and chief consultant to Chicago mayors Harold Washington and Richard M. Daley who has been Obama's chief strategist since 2002.
Bettylu Saltzman
Bettylu Saltzman
The other is a largely behind-the-scenes champion who has been there since the beginning of Obama's political career and played a quietly crucial - perhaps the most crucial - role in it. She is Bettylu Saltzman, a longtime liberal activist whose father, Philip Klutznick, was a legendary Chicago developer, Jewish leader and statesman who served as secretary of commerce in the Carter administration and played a leading role in the development of the State of Israel.
Saltzman recalled that when she first met the 30-year-old Obama, "I don't know what I saw, but others saw it too. I'm impressed by the numbers of people who said the same thing. He was clearly brilliant and articulate. I don't know what it was, but there was something about him that was clearly destined to be something very special."
She was working in Bill Clinton's presidential campaign at the time and, perhaps because she was thinking in presidential mode, "I immediately thought, he's going to be president some day. I said to my husband and to a lot of other people, he is going to be our first black president. Why I don't know, but I will never ever forget it."
Later, she said, as she got to know Obama, "I would sort of tease him about it. I always said to him, this is what I think is going to happen, and I think in his own mind he always thought that was what he was going to be, too."
While Saltzman said she "never thought about (her support) Jewishly," she added that "obviously I'm not going to support someone who is opposed to Israel and what it stands for. He's right on all the issues when it comes to Israel. He's in exactly the same place (Hillary) Clinton is, maybe even stronger. He's a clearer thinker."
She was also impressed with Michelle Obama and says that "we could have two great people in the White House."
Saltzman supported Obama during his campaign for the state Senate, which he won in 1996, and in his failed bid for Congress against Bobby Rush in 2000. And when Obama was contemplating a U.S. Senate run in 2002, she introduced him to a group of powerful Chicago women who call themselves the Ladies Who Lunch. Many became his supporters.
The following year, Saltzman may have played an even more crucial role in Obama's political rise when she asked him to speak at a downtown Chicago rally against the Iraq war that she was organizing. The speech he gave there became famous, and Obama's early opposition to the war served as a centerpiece of his primary campaign for president.
Saltzman has remained a supporter and now devotes her time to Obama's presidential campaign. "What he did in his early life in Chicago proved that he has a great commitment to people who are less well off," she said, adding that she is encouraged by how many young people are working to get out the vote for him. "People don't always understand the fact that he thinks so clearly," she said. "He is deliberative but not indecisive." And as for Israel, "I think his (recent) trip to the Middle East proved how well accepted he was there."
Meanwhile, after he finished his work with Project Vote, Obama took a job at a civil rights law firm, Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, led by Judson Miner, a well-known Chicago civil rights attorney and Mayor Harold Washington's former counsel. Miner said he met Obama when he read an article in the paper about Obama's wanting to join "a silk stocking law firm." He called Obama, Obama called him back and Miner's young son answered the phone. "He said a guy called me with a very funny name," Miner related. "I had forgotten all about him, but just by chance I called him back."
They agreed to meet and have lunch. Afterwards, "I called my wife and told her I just had lunch with the most impressive person I've ever met," Miner said. "He was truly extraordinary in all sorts of ways. He had a unique comfort with who he was and no pretenses. He was not trying to impress you with who he was. He had a lot of questions and wanted to talk seriously about things he was giving a lot of thought to."
Obama worked for Miner's firm for close to 10 years in two different stretches. When he decided to take time off to run for the state Senate, Miner said, a telling incident occurred. Under a fairly common arrangement, Obama planned to work for the firm part-time while serving in the Senate, considered by many to be a part-time job, and Miner agreed to pay him.
"On about his third day in Springfield, he called me up and said, Judd, this is unfair to you guys. I'm going to be putting in a lot more time than I thought I was going to, and I wouldn't feel right about being paid" by the law firm, Miner related.
Today, Miner is a firm supporter of his former employee's presidential bid. "He has plenty of life experiences that have sensitized him to the things that matter most," he said. "He has enormous self confidence but it is not arrogance. He is not a person who feels he has to hide things. He has very strong views but is very flexible."
Obama's "great strengths" are that he is "most comfortable dealing with people who he respects, who he thinks are dealing with him as equals, are sharing their true opinions. He is not interested in people who are yes men," Miner said.
"I don't know a blemish the guy has. We had many conversations about how do you engage in what you care about professionally while balancing your family obligations and commitment, and he has been quite successful in working it all out. He would be very effective in anything he wanted to do," he said.
Working at Miner's firm introduced Obama to many in the city's liberal community, and during his state Senate tenure, he gained other supporters, including Illinois Sen. Ira Silverstein, an Orthodox Jew who shared an office with him in Springfield. They also shared carpooling duties when both their children attended the secular pre-nursery at Akiba-Schechter Jewish Day School.
When they first met, Obama "never knew what an Orthodox Jew was," Silverstein said. Although his Hyde Park district had a large Jewish community, there were few Orthodox Jews. "Down there (in Springfield) on the Sabbath, he didn't understand my restrictions at first but he offered to help if I needed anything. He was very respectful and curious to find out. We talked about religion a lot. He is a very religious person," he said.
Silverstein continues to support Obama and said he is disturbed that "there is lot of bad information out there, a lot of miscommunication, misinformation that has been proved false" about the senator. He said he and Obama often shared their pro-Israel feelings and that when Silverstein sponsored numerous resolutions condemning PLO bombings, Obama eagerly signed on as a co-sponsor.
"I know him," he said. "People can read what they want to in the press, but I know him personally and I can testify to" his pro-Israel views. "That's different than hitting a blog," he said. "If people don't want to listen to me they don't have to, but there's a lot of hearsay out there."
In the state Senate, he said, Obama impressed him by his ability to work with the Republicans when the Democrats were the minority party, and by his ability to "bring people together."
Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf
Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf
Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, rabbi emeritus of KAM Isaiah Israel Congregation and a legendary Hyde Park liberal, is Obama's neighbor and longtime supporter. When Obama was running for the state Senate, Wolf held a fund-raiser for him and told him that "some day you will be the vice president of the United States. He said, why vice president, then he laughed. But we were all thinking this guy isn't going to stay in the state Senate."
"He moved across the street from a synagogue," KAM, he said. "He didn't have to do that."
In fact, Obama even has a Jew in his mishpocheh, albeit on his wife's side. Rabbi Capers Funnye, the spiritual leader of Beth Shalom B'nai Zaken-Agudath Achim Congregation on Chicago's South Side is Michelle Obama's cousin - her grandfather and the rabbi's mother were sister and brother.
Funnye, an enthusiastic supporter of Obama's presidential bid, said he met him before the couple married and "thought it was a good match." Later he worked with Obama when he was in the state Senate and Funnye was the director of a South Side youth services center and found him helpful and "always reachable."
"Despite some of the things that have been said, I certainly believe (Obama) has a genuine affinity for the State of Israel and the Jewish people," Rabbi Funnye said. "I'm hopeful that the broader Jewish community and the rest of the country will simply grow to understand they have nothing to fear from Obama on the State of Israel and Jewish issues in general."
His own congregation is "extremely supportive," and, he said, "throughout the black Jewish community in the United States, there's great enthusiasm and support for his candidacy. This is a historic moment in time in the history of our country." If Obama is elected president, "I think we will have achieved the ideals for which this country really stands," he said.
When Obama ran for the Senate in 2004, he had not yet visited Israel - one scheduled trip coincided with the birth of his daughter - but he has since been there twice, in 2006 and earlier this summer. Michael Kotzin, executive vice president of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, was along on the January, 2006 trip, part of the federation's "ongoing agenda to help public officials better understand Israel," he said. (The organization is nonpartisan.)
On the trip, "we exposed him to aspects of Israel that might not otherwise be noted, aspects where this community and the federation are actively engaged," he said. The senator discussed Ethiopian aliyah with the head of the Jewish Agency "to understand aliyah, how basic that is to Israel," Kotzin said, and visited an Israeli-Arab-Christian village, among other sites.
The visit "gave him insights into Israeli life and society that are not commonly known, and that registered for him when he gave his main speech in Chicago on Israel and the Middle East," he said. "He ended up talking about the trip he took and how he connected with aspects of the Israeli population and people and understanding the importance of Israel to our community."
Lester Crown
Lester Crown
Another longtime Chicago supporter, philanthropist, community leader and member of one of Chicago's Jewish royal families, Lester Crown, has known Obama since his first days in Chicago, when Minow called Crown and "said we have in our office a young man who I think is really going places, and I'd like you to meet him." Crown has been a supporter ever since; his son James heads Obama's Illinois financial campaign.
Crown said that despite Obama's "rock-star, amazing popularity," he has not changed fundamentally in all the years they have known each other. "He's the same person, even though there are tremendous pressures on him. In the last six or eight months, he hasn't gotten a swelled head. If he ever got a little bit of one, his wife would bring him back in two minutes." Michelle Obama, he said, is "absolutely brilliant."
Crown said he is "bothered" by portions of the Jewish community that express concerns, particularly, about Obama's position on Israel. "From the time I met him, the times we talked about Israel, and we talked about it several times, he has been an ardent backer of Israel's defense position, Israel's security position," he said. "He has been a proponent of the two-state solution, but only on the hopes that you will have a demilitarized peaceful Palestinian entity, which you do not have now."
Most important, Crown said, is that "knowing him long before he got into politics, I know he is completely supportive, without any question or equivocation, of Israel's security. He is only interested (in a two-state solution) if Israel's security is absolutely assured, and that was his position long before he ever went into politics. His speeches to AIPAC are not new positions, merely the vocalization of what he has always believed," he said.

The doubters

Not everyone in the Jewish community agrees.
Jewish criticism of Obama - aside from the lunatic fringe that still harps on his middle name, Hussein, and supposed Muslim "credentials" - centers on four factors: his positions on Israel, several of his foreign policy advisors, his foreign policy inexperience and his apparent willingness as president to talk to the Iranian regime. His domestic agenda is little mentioned in these debates.
Emily Soloff
Emily Soloff
Emily Soloff, area director of the nonpartisan American Jewish Committee, said that is natural since "the Jewish community is passionate about many things but particularly about Israel. People for whom Israel is the issue or the primary issue look with a magnifying glass at everything a candidate says or does. The nature of campaigning in America makes it difficult for any candidate to hold up to that kind of scrutiny."
In addition, she said, "Jews are well educated, they're readers, there are many Jewish bloggers, all of which means the amount of information that comes out about a candidate, there is tremendously more information coming out than there has been in the past."
In such an environment, "people tend to shrei (Yiddish for yell) a little bit louder to get their voices heard," she said. "In terms of this election, Obama's youth and his newness also has put him under greater scrutiny than candidates who have been in the public eye for much longer and have longer records of action as well as words."
Even former Israeli cabinet minister Natan Sharansky has expressed his concerns, telling a Shalom TV interviewer that Obama has no record on foreign policy and that an Obama presidency would be a "risk" for Israel.
Closer to home, Rabbi Victor Weissberg, a local Israel activist and chair of To Protect Our Heritage PAC, which works to promote a closer alliance between the United States and Israel, said Obama is "flawed.
"He is suddenly forced to become specific and not use a lot of gloss words like change; that isn't working for him any more," he said. "He's a very bright fellow but he's sort of a hollow man, and America really needs somebody of substance who will say what he means and won't change," he said. Obama has changed his position on offshore oil drilling and other issues, he said. "We're not dummies, we can think straight," he said. "The people who are going to lead us need to think straight too and not shoot their doggone mouths off."
"At the AIPAC conference, he was a wow." Weissberg said. "He had people standing up on their seats cheering. He has tried to say all the right things about Israel, but because he flip-flops, people are really at sixes and sevens with themselves about him. Israelis think he's not the right candidate at the right time for their situation. We were there for Pesach and almost unanimously they were in favor of (presumptive Republican nominee John) McCain."
Polls have, indeed, shown that McCain is perceived in Israel as a staunch friend of the Jewish state, and that some Israelis have been wary of Obama's statement, during a meeting with Jewish leaders in Cleveland in February, that "there is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel that you're anti-Israel."
Chaya Gil
Chaya Gil
One Israeli native and longtime Chicagoan, attorney and community activist Chaya Gil, said she is "definitely worried" about an Obama presidency, for several reasons.
One is the candidate's "very close intimate relationship" with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his longtime pastor who gained notoriety for his inflammatory statements and is widely perceived to be anti-Semitic and anti-Israel. Obama denounced Wright earlier this year and eventually severed his ties with him and his church.
"Wright doesn't love America, he speaks against his country and he said awful things about Israel. He's no good for the Jewish community and it's not good that he is the role model for Obama," Gil said. She said that when Obama said he wasn't aware of some of Wright's positions, "he was lying. There is a character issue."
In addition, she said, Obama "said he will talk to Iran and other countries. That says to me that he will be manipulated by Iran and others."
She said she is also concerned about Obama's relationships with some advisors perceived to be anti-Israel, including Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security advisor in the Carter administration; Samantha Power, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and lecturer at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, who was forced to leave the Obama campaign after making a derogatory remark about Hillary Clinton but is said to still be advising him; and Robert Malley, another Clinton administration advisor.
Gil's worries parallel those of right-wing media outlets that have recently taken aim at the advisors. Brzezinski was perceived as unfriendly to Israel during the Carter administration and, more recently, initially endorsed the views of Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, authors of articles and a book blaming the pro-Israel lobby for American foreign policy failures. They are anathema to most Jews. Brzezinski later said their book overstated its case.
Power has drawn the ire of Israel activists because of her stinging criticism of Israel's first Lebanon War. Malley was perceived as blaming Israel for the breakdown of the U.S.-brokered Israeli-Palestinian talks at Camp David in the summer of 2000, which he attended as a senior adviser to President Clinton.
Another frequent target of conservative bloggers has been George Soros, the billionaire philanthropist who has often been critical of Israel's policies. He has contributed to the Obama campaign.
The campaign has said that the three advisors, who are among hundreds, have a peripheral role in the campaign and do not advise Obama on Middle East policy. Soros, although he has donated to Obama, has no role in the campaign, an Obama spokesperson has said.
Gil said that Obama "has put these people on ice lately, hushed up their relationship. But they're not dead, they will pop up the minute he's elected." Israelis, she said, although they were impressed with him during his recent visit to the Jewish state, "know he is not coming in good faith."
She said that "at a time of pressure," Obama "loses his balance. He is very good when he is prepared, but once in a while he is asked a question that he does not expect, and he stutters. He would say whatever suits him."
Another Israeli-born Chicagoan, who did not want to be identified, said she is "very very uncomfortable" with Obama, "not because he is not a good man" but because "he knows very little about Israel."
She added that she doesn't believe Obama has enough experience to be able to run the country in difficult times. "If you ask me, we need a strong person who can move things around to what they used to be, a strong America, a great Israel," she said. That person is not Obama, she said.
Richard Baehr
Richard Baehr
Much of the concern over Obama's perceived anti-Israel advisors has been spurred by Richard Baehr, the chief political correspondent of the American Thinker, an online conservative magazine that Jewish Telegraphic Agency political correspondent Ron Kampeas calls "the principle redoubt of Obama-Israel skepticism."
In a recent phone conversation, Baehr, who is a member of the Republican Jewish Coalition, reiterated his concerns about Brzezinski, Power and Malley, calling them "Jimmy Carter retreads."
"If you have one or two bad apples, OK, but this team is full of them from top to bottom," Baehr said. "This is what the pro-Israel community is most nervous about."
Kampeas, the JTA correspondent, writes that "much, if not the vast majority, of the material targeting Obama's advisors is distorted and even false," and many Jewish Obama supporters agree.
Doni Remba
Doni Remba
One, former Chicagoan Gidon "Doni" Remba, president and co-founder of the Jewish Alliance for Change, which advocates for Obama in the Jewish community, has dedicated his Web site and newsletter to rebutting what he calls "lies that are spreading virally. A lot of Jews are getting concerned on the basis of a fear and smear campaign, and they're not looking at the facts. This is politics at its worst," he said in a recent conversation.
He said that information in the American Thinker by Baehr and Northbrook's Ed Lasky "looks like a very serious essay, but it is all based on distortions, misleading information, twisting statements, statements taken out of context and downright false information."
For instance, Remba said, Brzezinski "was not an advisor to Obama on Israel, just somebody who had a couple of conversations with him about Iraq." (The Obama campaign confirmed that neither Brzezinski, Power nor Malley advised Obama on Israel-related issues.)
"The critics ignore the fact that McCain had as much or more of a relationship with these same anti-Israel advisors. McCain said he would consider appointing seasoned hands, people like Brzezinski and James Baker (secretary of state for the first President Bush). Obama said he would never consider using Baker. People ignore that.
"The most prominent smear is that he is secretly not pro-Israel, but everything he has done and said, his entire record of years of public life, all the legislation he sponsored is pro-Israel," Remba said, accusing Obama's Jewish detractors of "bringing up very tangential things and twisting them in such as way as to arouse people's fears.
"I saw it in my own family," he said. "A lot of Jews, they are getting these e-mails. I got them from my uncle, my cousins, my family in Israel and other parts of the country. People are saying, is this true? Their fears have been aroused."
On the Israel question, some Jews see the fact that Dennis Ross, President Clinton's Middle East envoy and chief negotiator who served in both Democratic and Republican administrations, is advising Obama on Israel as a reassuring sign. Joy Malkus, research director for the Joint Action Committee for Political Affairs, a Chicago-based political action committee that supports Israel, church-state separation and reproductive choice, said members of the PAC "are comfortable with where (Obama) stands as far as Israel is concerned. Especially now that Dennis Ross has come to work for him, we have no concerns whatsoever as far as his position on Israel goes." The PAC has endorsed Obama but will not be supporting him financially because he is not accepting money from PACs.
Malkus said the PAC decided to support Obama because "McCain's voting record (on Israel) is perfect so there's no reason to think he would not be excellent on Israel but he does not meet our domestic criteria."
She said she thinks some Jews are uncomfortable with Obama because of his shorter voting record, but said that "I find it disappointing. I don't think you can just base (your vote) on the length of a voting record. He's surrounding himself with people who care about moving the process forward and having a two-state solution that works. If people have questions, they should look back at what (Dennis) Ross has written. He is quite a strong person to have in your corner." The PAC, she said, is "strongly in favor of the U.S. facilitating whatever is necessary to move the peace process forward, and that's where Obama stands on Israel."
Baehr counters such arguments from Jewish supporters. "I don't see the fact that some major scions of the Jewish community support (Obama) as meaning he is pro-Israel," he said. "In the Senate, he has behaved more traditionally and signed on to most resolutions that AIPAC would consider pro-Israel. But now and then something slips out." He cited a 2004 interview in which Obama was critical of the Israeli security wall and his more recent statement, to Cleveland Jewish leaders, that being pro-Israel doesn't mean being pro-Likud.
"I don't think an American president should decide who he should be for in the Israeli government," Baehr said. "His view of being pro-Israel doesn't mean being sympathetic to the elected leaders of the Israeli people. That's a difficult position to put yourself in."
He said another "bothersome factor" is that people in Obama's Hyde Park neighborhood said "he wasn't reticent about arguing that American policy is too pro-Israel and needed more balance. The general perception is that he was a Palestinian sympathizer. That doesn't mean he is hostile to Jews or Israel but he is not a strong Israel supporter.
"Now he's saying all the right things and voting the right way, but there are a whole bunch of little threads out there that make people nervous," Baehr said. "Nobody questioned whether McCain or Hillary (Clinton) was pro-Israel, but with Obama, there are questions."
Joel Sprayregen, the Chicago attorney and Israel activist, said that he worries about Obama's lack of experience, his foreign policy advisors, and "the fact that he was so wrong on the surge in Iraq," which Obama opposed. Many Americans believe that the added troop deployment known as the surge has made Iraq safer.
Sprayregen said that while he is encouraged that so many thoughtful and committed Jews are in Obama's camp, he believes that "Jews still tend to vote Democratic in knee-jerk fashion thinking they're still voting for FDR's New Deal. Too many Jews do not take into account the fact that President Bush has been enormously supportive of Israel. I think we have no better guide than (Connecticut senator) Joe Lieberman, a true liberal on domestic issues, as to which of his senatorial colleagues is more qualified to be commander-in-chief." Lieberman is supporting McCain.

The supporters

If Obama has a way to go to garner solid Jewish support in other parts of the country, in Chicago it seems solid and growing.
Some of his champions are longtime friends like Rabbi Wolf of KAM, who worries that Jews who don't know Obama think of him as "remote." "It may be the Muslim element in his background, it may be that he's black. Jews are like everybody else, they have some questions about a black president," Wolf said.
But he may understand Obama's background better than most. When people ask him if Obama is "tough enough," he says, "When you come up in Chicago politics, you better be tough."
He believes Obama is "very cautious. Whenever we talked about issues, I would always be more radical than he. He listened a lot but said very little. He'll listen and listen and you don't always know what he thinks. He knows as much as any of us about the Middle East, and he hasn't said a word about the Palestinians that President Bush hasn't already said."
Many Jews may have been more friendly to Hillary Clinton, he said, because "she is more of a known quantity. You know, the Jews can't stand not to worry. Nobody (in politics) is against Israel, they can't afford to be, why should they be? He knows more than most people do about the (Middle East) situation, but he's going to go very cautiously and not do anything that shakes up the Jewish community. I'm not sure I agree with that, but that's what's going to happen."
He would advise Obama to "make his Jewish supporters more visible. He could mention them, put them forward, be proud of the Jewish community's support."
The rabbi's own feeling is that Obama is "sort of Jewish in a way. His overachieving is Jewish, his intellectualism is Jewish, even his charisma has a Jewish side. Maybe I feel it more strongly than others do, but I feel like he's one of us.
"I like McCain too, but he ain't one of us," he added.
One of Obama's most ardent Chicago supporters is Jack S. Levin, an attorney practicing international law and a longtime community activist who said he is not a Democrat but an independent who "supports candidates I think are superior. I am not a down-the-line Democrat or Republican and I don't support mediocre candidates. I support Barack because I think he would be best for our country," he said.
Levin has known Obama for more than 15 years, since Levin served on the Harvard Law School Visiting Committee and met the young law student. "Members of the Visiting Committee don't typically take much note of students, but he was outstanding, an absolutely standout student," he said.
He became reacquainted with Obama when he served in the Illinois Senate and sponsored legislation that would help to create jobs by bringing more private equity and venture capital to the state, one of Levin's areas of expertise. He continued to be so impressed with Obama that now he serves on his campaign finance, tax policy, Jewish community and Middle East committees.
He calls Obama "a brilliant, far-thinking, organized, thoughtful super kind of person. He has wonderful thoughts and ideas and he soaks up experiences in moments that it would take other people years to get. He is jumping in knowledge year by year. His grasp of ideas and concepts and ability to understand what other people are thinking is wonderful."
Having served in the office of the Solicitor General in Washington, Levin said he has many friends who have worked in the White House, and believes that "the most important attribute of a president is the ability to think, reason, absorb information and make decisions when there is conflicting advice, and Obama is just terrific at that.
"You can give all the speeches you want to about how you would handle issues, but (as president) 100 times a day things cross your desk that you had never thought of, and (a president needs) a great ability to think and grasp, to do the right thing, to analyze the conflicting advice being received and work it out and say, this is the course we should take.
"No one is as good as Obama at hearing conflicting views, thoughts, advice and ideas, at looking at a complex problem and implementing solutions," he said.
Levin said he does much international travel and what those trips have shown him is that "our country has turned into a pariah on the world stage. For the last few years, our leaders have not been people who could interrelate well with other world leaders. We are reviled, not respected."
Obama, he said, "is going to be the closest there is to someone who is able to restore some modicum of respect internationally."
Levin said he has worked with Obama for years on many issues and that the senator has always been a strong supporter of Israel.
As for Jewish community support, he said that "here in Chicago, people know him better than other places, and the vast majority of the Jewish leadership of Chicago support him wholeheartedly. We know he would be best for Israel and for the United States. I think it is an issue of Obama getting better known in Florida, New York and other places where the Jewish community hasn't yet had the opportunity to touch hands with him and realize how wise and capable he is and how strongly he supports Israel."

Why the distrust?

A number of Obama's Jewish supporters have set about figuring out why some Jews - especially in other states - are distrustful of him. Abner Mikva said that the "unknown" factor is strong. Jews "were distrustful of (John) Kerry, (Al) Gore, (Bill) Clinton before he ran, Jimmy Carter, Lyndon Johnson. It goes all the way back. The first time I was campaigning for John F. Kennedy, I stopped at somebody's door, a Jewish voter, and he said, you know he's an anti-Semite. His father was, so he must be."
Another factor, Mikva said, is one that "always bothers and embarrasses me about my co-religionists. A piece of our community still thinks of African Americans as schvartzes - somehow not sufficiently educated or smart enough to occupy the White House. All I can say to that is, they're wrong. I think (Obama) will turn out to be one of the greatest presidents we've ever had."
He said he once tried to explain to Obama why some parts of the Jewish community didn't support him. "I said, Barack, it wouldn't matter if your name was Sholem Aleichem, there's some segments of the Jewish community you wouldn't get. He said, well, my name is Baruch Obama." (During his 2004 campaign, Obama, visiting a Jewish center for the aged in Boston, discussed the etymological relationship of his first name, which means "blessed" in Swahili, to its Hebrew counterpart, Baruch.)
On the racial issue, Remba, the president of the Jewish Alliance for Change, agreed that "some people from an older generation have a very different experience in their lives with black Americans than people even in their 40s and 50s. Middle-aged and younger people have grown up in integrated America and are very comfortable and used to working with blacks, knowing them as friends and neighbors, viewing them in a way that race doesn't matter."
To some people, including Jews, who grew up in an older era, "your whole experience of black people is they come from the wrong side of the tracks, they're associated with crime, with danger, they're poor, gang related. If your whole experience of black people is the South Side of Chicago - not Hyde Park - you would have a sort of fearful set of associations."
He said he believes some "holdover of these associations and biases" may be in play with Obama's candidacy, but many Jews may be able to overcome it. "The vast majority of Jews, including older Jews, can judge Obama as an individual, an American, someone who has been so close to so many people in the Jewish community of Chicago for so many years. When they get to see who he is, I hope they'll put aside their fears," he said.
Those fears have been stoked by e-mails to pro-Israel activists warning that if Obama is elected, Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will have prominent places in his administration, as well as a cartoon published earlier this year in the Israeli newspaper Maariv showing Obama painting the White House black.
Alan Solow
Alan Solow
Still most of Obama's Jewish supporters believe it is the Israel issue, not racial politics, that may be keeping some Jews from endorsing him. Alan Solow, a Chicago attorney, community leader and former chair of the Jewish Community Relations Council who has known Obama for many years, said he would like to put those fears to rest.
He has known Obama since both lived in Hyde Park and began actively supporting him during his U.S. Senate bid. "Working on his behalf, I had the opportunity to have many discussions with him on a wide range of issues," he said. "I have always been delighted with the way he approaches problems and I've become more impressed as time has gone on."
On the Israel question, Solow said Obama's entire public policy approach, statements and votes "all consistently point to a position that is very helpful to strengthening the relationship between the U.S. and Israel. There isn't one single action or vote that anyone can point to that would cast any doubt on what his position would be," he said.
Beyond foreign policy, Solow said, "I think his positions are much more consistent with the vast majority of the Jewish community - the right to choose, separation of church and state, social justice issues generally. The Jewish community ought to be looking at those issues as well." He said that although many Jews don't feel they know Obama as well as they do Hillary Clinton or John McCain, he has a "long consistent record" of pro-Israel support. "People should look at what his record is and not say, we still don't know," he said.
On the question of inexperience, Obama's old friend Ira Silverstein said, "Look, McCain has been around longer, but we've had President Bush in there and he was a governor, the head of a major league baseball team, and look at our economy. I've seen (Obama) work in the Senate. I've seen him. He can bring people together. I know him personally. Leadership? I can testify to it."
Another old friend, Rabbi Wolf, gives another kind of testimony. Obama, he says, is "embedded in the Jewish world."

guess the obama and his zoinist took care of him he wasnt one of them any how Wells Fargo executive Abid Gilani killed Amtrak crash

Wells Fargo executive Abid Gilani killed Amtrak crash

Abid Gilani, Senior Vice President at Wells Fargo, was one of seven people killed when Amtrak 188 train derailed in Philadelphia.

Abid Gilani, Senior Vice President at Wells Fargo, was one of seven people killed when Amtrak 188 train derailed in Philadelphia.

A Wells Fargo executive, traveling after a family funeral, was one of at least seven people killed on Tuesday in a deadly Amtrak crash, a relative and the company confirmed.
Abid Gilani, a 55-year-old senior vice president, was a passenger on the Northeast Regional Train 188 when it veered off the track in Philadelphia.
Gilani and his mother from Toronto had attended funeral services for his uncle in Virginia, and he had to return to New York City for work, a cousin told the Daily News.
The married father of two had recently relocated with his family to Walnut Creek, Calif. from Maryland while his kids went to college on the West Coast. The dedicated dad and executive had to commute across the country each week to work in Manhattan and returned home each weekend to California to be with his wife.
Amtrak Horror: Several Dead, More Than 140 Injured
NY Daily News
His worried spouse rushed to Philadelphia on Wednesday morning when she didn't hear from him. The family is struggling with the grim news of his death.
"His mother was in town from Toronto for the funeral of her brother and now has to bury her son," the cousin said.
Gilani had worked for Wells Fargo for about a year after nearly eight years with hotel giant Marriott International.
Emergency responders search for passengers following an Amtrak train derailment on Tuesday in the Frankfort section of Philadelphia, Pa.

Emergency responders search for passengers following an Amtrak train derailment on Tuesday in the Frankfort section of Philadelphia, Pa.

He was "a valued member of our Commercial Real Estate division," a spokeswoman told the Daily News. "Our hearts go out to all those impacted by this tragedy."

Promoted Stories

The Jewish Holy War Against Goyim! (Part 3 of 3) By Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, A.U.S. Ret.

The Jewish Holy
War Against Goyim!

(Part 3 of 3)

By Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, A.U.S. Ret.
Part 1

During the Middle Ages, commerce was the great battlefield of Europe. On the one side were the native born, and on the other the Jewish invaders. When the smoke of battle cleared, the Jews were victorious. They had acquired control of the entire commercial world. They looked on this as being a mark of God's approval of their way of doing business. Yet a careful check of history, shows that Jewish methods of doing business, have never enriched a nation, or a people, or been a mark of God's approval on evil, but put enormous amounts into the coffers of a few.
As is well known, Jews seldom engage in agriculture, mining, production of raw materials, or even in the manufacture of things from raw materials. He is mostly interested in the circulation of values, exchanging worthless articles for good money.
In a great majority of cases, Jews are parasites. They recognize this. In his book "JEWS MUST LIVE," published in 1934, by the Golden Hind Press in New York City, Samuel Roth (Jew) said, "Our major vice of old, as of today, is parasitism. We are a people of vultures living on the labor and good nature of the rest of the world.
"It is my belief, that nothing the Jew does in America is essential to it's welfare. On the contrary, a great deal of what the American Jew does is in subversion to America's best interests." (UNQ)
They appropriate what other people make with the sweat of their brow. This is why they have a tendency to keep aloof from agriculture. They want nothing that will tie them down to a particular area. They must be free to move at a moments notice, heading for where the business action is. This means that Jews always seek out areas where the most plunder is available, and is one of the major reasons they have become so prominent as leaders of vice.
During the time when the Italian Republics flourished, Venice, Genoa, and Florence, were over run by Jews. When these Republics fell, the Jews packed up their treasures and migrated northward to settle in Germany, Poland, and the Netherlands, where commerce and industry was on the increase.
They were the least successful in Spain, mainly because the Spanish royalty forced them to leave, when they realized that they were opening the gates of Spanish cities to the Moorish invasion from North Africa.
Jews are the same today as they were 2,000 years ago when our Lord called them Satan's kids, (see John 8:44). They have the same characteristics now as they had then, and even their religion has not changed, moving down through the years from the Jewish priesthood, to ancient rabbinism, then to modern rabbinism. As one eminent Jewish authority said, "Down through the centuries, the spirit of the ancient Pharisees has remained intact." Neither time, nor habit, nor intercourse with foreign elements have changed them. They are the same blood sucking parasites who Jesus Christ called poisonous snakes, (see Matthew 12:34; 23:33). Remember, please that these are not my accusations, but those of your Savior. No wonder they are pressuring Christian authorities to revise the New Testament and remove these remarks. To a thinking man or woman, these remarks by our Savior "shoot holes in the Jews Chosen People Myth." For more information on this subject, may I suggest my pamphlet "EXPLODING THE CHOSEN PEOPLE MYTH", available from Destiny Publishers, P.O. Box 177, Merrimac, MA 01860. They are 50 cents each or 35 cents in lots of 25 or more.
Quoting from this pamphlet, I make reference to a statement made by Dr. Benjamin Freedman in his book "FACTS ARE FACTS". He says, "The utterance by the Christian clergy, which confuses Christians most, is the constantly repeated utterance that 'Jesus was a Jew!' This appears to be their theme. It is a misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact... informed, intelligent Christians, cannot reconcile this unwarranted misrepresentation and distortion of the facts."
Most honest Bible historians will admit that at no time in the New Testament was Jesus ever called a Jew, although He called this by others, (see Matthew 2:2; 27:11; Luke 23:3). The great Jewish historian Josephus called Him a Judean, never once did he call him a Jew. The very inscription over His cross, in Latin said, "Iesus Nazarenous Rex Iudorum", and any of you who understand Latin, knows this say, "Jesus the Nazerene, ruler of the Judeans." By no stretch of the imagination can you get this to say "King of the Jews." It was translated in the original 1611 King James Version of the Bible. It is sloppy scholarship such as this that often confuses our people and leads them to believe, those who are their worst enemies, Dr. Freedman said that converted Jews had proven themselves too often to be spies of Judaism, placed in the Christian church to cause trouble from within. Jesus implied this is John 12:40, when quoting from Isaiah 6:9,10, He said, "He (God) hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them." There are many who believe, with some Scriptural support, that a fake Jew (Revelations 2:9; 3:9), those called Jews today cannot be saved.
Because of Jewish ties with religion, tradition, and hatred of all non-Jews, they will never change (Malachi 1:4). You might as well expect a leopard to change his spots, as for a Jew to change his grasping nature. A Jew can be born in, or emigrate to any nation and become a Frenchman, an Englishman, a German, or an American, but if you ask him what he is, he will invariably say, "I am a Jew!" His alliance is to the Jewish people, not to God, or any nation, not even the country where he was born. Jews claim they can combine both qualities and be good dual citizens, but it is impossible, and Jesus Himself said, "A man cannot serve two masters:" (Matthew 6:24)
I have heard Jews boast, "We are Jews to our fingertips," and since there is little beyond the fingertips, this leaves no room for patriotism of any kind, only a blind loyalty for Judaism.
This trend towards treason can be seen in Jewish officials who have taken the Kol Nidre Oath on the Day of Atonement. (It is my understanding that even secular Jews take this oath.) In their TALMUD, this is referred to as the "Law of Revocation in Advance." The recital of this prayer, called the all vows prayer, releases a Jew from any obligations under oaths, vows, or pledges entered into during the following year. This means that his oath of office, to support and defend the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, is meaning less, unless he chooses to follow it. Apparently President Clinton never took this into consideration when he appointed more than forty Jews to high government positions such as Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, and Secretary of the Treasury. Or maybe he did! Is it any wonder our country is in dire trouble?
In 1844, a group of German Rabbis, realizing the effect that knowledge concerning the Kol Nidre Oath was having on the German people, tried at the International Conference of Rabbis in Brunswick, Germany, to have it changed. The preponderance of Yiddish speaking Rabbis, who were Russian Khazars (meaning they had no Abrahamic blood in their veins), voted it down, and this oath remains an integral part of Jewish worship until this day.
Does this mean that a Jewish Judge is not to be trusted if he has taken the Kol Nidre Oath? How about a Jewish Congressman, or lawyer? Think about this!
The Jews in America are the only ethnic group who are allowed dual citizenship. This means they can be citizens of the Jewish State in Palestine, and at the same time have the full benefits of American citizenship. It has been proven, over and over again, that when the chips are down, they will almost invariably show their loyalties to the Israeli State. This action can be seen in the many pro-Zionist, anti-American actions of Jewish members of Congress.
Throughout the Middle Ages, the Jews laid their foundations for future power. They cleverly arranged, through their usury system, to pile up treasures in every country in which they settled, patiently waiting for the day when they could emerge from the darkness and climb to the top of the economic power heap. They have reached the apex now!
On a spring day in the late 1800's, the old edifice of feudalism broke down with a crash heard round the world, an political and ecclesiastical institutions have never fully recovered from the effects of the French Revolution.
This was a Jewish revolution, so acknowledged by their leaders and was the same way they brought forth in Russia in 1918. The pathway for Jewish conquest of the world now lay open before them. Undermined by the doctrines of Voltaire and conquered by the power of Jewish liberalism, the national and religious limitations of the Middle Ages crumbled into dust and the past was given over to Jewish reconstruction of the present and future. Not for the benefit of mankind, but for the edification, and glorification of the Jewish people.
Just as they did later in the Century, and at the end of the American Civil War, so now, the Jews led in the cry, "Long live tolerance! Long live Fraternity! Down with rank! Away with individual rights!" While the South was saved by the patriotic efforts of Americans who refused to buckle under to the Jewish power in Washington.
With their ranks closed, Jews now opened attacks on their enemies everywhere and as they overcame them one by one, they erected their own standard, the six pointed star of David, which as far as I can find out, was never used by David. Since that date in the 1800's, the standard of Judaism has been unfurled from the watchtowers of Christendom in Europe and a few and far between have been the statesmen who had the moral courage to stand up to their corruption. With the exception of a few years in the 1900's when the German people under Adolf Hitler made a bid for national freedom and struggled to free Germany from Jewish oppression, only to be whipped down by their own Anglo-Saxon people, who once again listened to the siren call of world Judaism, over common sense and scriptural truth.
Today, Hitler is hated by the Jews, not because he tried to annihilate them, as this has never been proven, but because he tried to break their grip on Christian Germany.
By stirring up revolutions and then lending their support, Jews assisted on one hand with the distribution of State overthrowing Utopias, while on the other, they furthered their quest for world power.
Jewish writers such as Marcus Eli Ravage, and others have admitted that Jews have been at the bottom of nearly all the revolutions which have taken place in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.
Another Jewish writer, Oscar Levy, in the preface to his book "THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION." said, "There is scarcely an event in modern Europe which cannot be traced back to the Jews. We Jews today are nothing else but the world's seducers; it's destroyers; it's incendiaries; it's executioners", and they glory in bragging about it!
We know that all governments require money to operate and that the men who lend are Jews - thus they gain both in cash and it's corresponding power and privileges.
During the American Revolution, both sides were financed by the Jews, as was the Russian Revolution, the War Between the States, and World Wars I and II. The Jewish bankers became fabulously wealthy off the gains they had made on the suffering of mostly White Christian nations, while they killed off the cream of manhood and fattened us for future conquest. In the last 150 years, the world has been drenched in mostly Christian blood, as White nations have fought White nations, in Jew instigated wars, and the Jews sat back and gleefully rubbed their hands at the destruction of their enemies.
As atoms are drawn towards larger masses under the law of gravity, so nations drift towards the riches of the Jews. Under the same law, the motion of attracted bodies, becomes more and more accelerated and thus Jewish money power grows daily.
It is simple fact, which cannot be disputed, that at the present, not one single financial operation of any size can be carried out, without having some Jew being involved and profiting from it.
In this manner, Jews have grown from a despised people, the carpetbaggers, and hated usurers of history, to become the wealthiest, most influential citizens, often with front seats in our most prestigious churches, and often with full support for their still nefarious enterprises coming from the Christian world. Abortion clinics; prostitution; drug traffic; music, etc. After all, they are God's Chosen, you know!
From the height of this economic pinnacle, they command the entire Babylonian Money System of finance and industry. There is not a man or woman among us, no matter how anti-Jewish we may be, who does not in some way pay tribute to Jewish money power. Even in the every day necessities of life we purchase at the local grocery store, we aid them. You can count on your fingers the number of politicians, preachers, and educators, who are not debtors to the Jews, and therefore under their power. Note: Many non-Jews are not aware of the great Kosher labeling scheme. Large food produces are force to place a K or a U on their products, indicating they are blessed by a Rabbi. If a corporation dose not do this, they are labeled anti-Semites, and the full weight of world Jewish organizations, Masonic orders, and useful idiots Judeo-Christian groups, come down on them. There is even a brand of generic motor oil and toilet bowl cleaners, with the kosher labels. In Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress gets kick backs this way. Symbols differ from country to country; even in Islamic nations, this is going on.
Jewish financial power resembles an imp which cannot be seen, who has his hand in every pocket. He is especially experienced in the art of seduction, having been trained directly by the master seducer of all times, John 8:44. He speaks to the Christian world today, saying essence, what he said to Jesus during His period of temptation, (Matthew 4:8,9) when he showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and said, "All these things (worldly kingdoms) I will give thee, if thou wilt fall down and Worship me." Very few so-called Christians have the courage to answer him as the Master did when He said, "...for it is written, 'Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thy serve." So instead of happiness, he leads us into hell, and a world slavery too horrible to contemplate.
Hand in hand with his phenomenal rise to power, has been the rise of individual members of his clan. Those wandering Jews who used to be the crafty, hated speculators, old clothes salesmen, and peddlers, have now opened elegant offices in the world's most prestigious buildings.
At the close of the Napoleonic Wars, in Frankfort, Germany, a Jew named Rothschild, rose to power as the visible head of world Jewry. All other Jews bowed to his power. As king of world finance he commanded the rallying masses of Jewish capital as surely as Hitler later controlled Germany, and his subjects were countless millions who labored daily to support his splendor.
It is impossible to calculate the powers of this family, which was greater than that of any crowned head that ruled in Europe. Presidents and Kings cringed before that power and bowed to their wishes.
In the Twentieth Century, this European Jewish family has been challenged by an American Jewish family named the Rockefeller. These people have successfully hidden their Jewishness behind a facade of Protestantism, as they engaged in a life and death struggle with their European counterparts.
The profits accrued by the International Jewish Bankers, were used to improve their social standing, and we see them today, as they mingle with, and inter-marry with the aristocracy of Europe and America, thus furthering their control.
They have longed for a monopoly of the Liberal Arts and Sciences, which at one time were open only to the higher ranks of society. Knowing they could acquire these honors only by means of engaging in literature, medicine, and public education, they set out to monopolize these professions, until today they are almost completely in control. The Christian world set complacently by, or cooperated while their enemies took control.
Today, Jewish journalists in every state, form a closely knit combine, composed of some of the most clever minds in America, who are dedicated to the furtherance of International Zionism, by all means fair or foul. They are men like Peter Jennings, Dan Rathers, and Sam Donaldson all on National TV, who control the thinking of large numbers of Americans, who get their only news from TV, or the daily newspaper. They have appropriated the rights of intervention in foreign affairs, to the point where the Anti-Defamation League, of the Jewish B'Nai B'Rigth (An unregistered agent of the Israeli, operating illegally on American soil without a license) to all intents and purposes controls our Congress. Powerful politicians like former Arkansas Senator J. William Fulbright have tried to buck them, only to be shot down in flames. Today, for a politician to criticize Jewish interests is political suicide.
As the Jews attained social status, they began a determined effort to infiltrated the Christian social world, brainwashing Christians of every hue with the false theology, that those who hated and murdered our Savior, were indeed God's Chosen People, and as such can do no wrong. They did this most cleverly by infiltrating Christian seminaries, until today, very few seminaries or Bible schools exist that do not have Jewish professors, many of them who do not bother to say they are saved.
Blinded by Jewish cries of the Fatherhood of God, and the brotherhood of all men, coming from a variety of organizations designed to confuse Christian thinking, and from apostate sources, under Jewish control, such as the National Council of churches; befuddled by the humane appeal of Jewish theories, our churchmen for the most part seemed incapable of perceiving the danger which threatened the Christian world from Jewish sources, even though the Jews openly stated what they intended to, "Drive God from the skies, and destroy White Christian civilization."
One look at the world of diplomacy, will show that it has been over run by Jews. In England, Dislraeli, took over as Prime Minister during the reign of Queen Victoria, and Lord Beaconsfield, later became Prime Minister. The "WESTMINISTER REVIEW" at that time quoted Daniel O'Connor as saying, "If Disraeli's genealogy would be traced, he would no doubt be found to be a true heir of the impenitent thief on the cross." (Luke 23:39)
There were others in England, Sir Nathaniel De Rothschild Bart; Josiah Wedgewood during World War I; Theodore Herzl, the father of modern Zionism, who was a power in British politics at the time.
Samuel Untermeyer, who arranged for the "International Boycott Conference" in Amsterdam, Holland in July 1933, stated, "...this holy war ... in which we (Jews) are embarked is a war that must be waged unremittingly . the Jews are the aristocrats of the world ....this boycott must be against all German goods, shipping, and services... we will drive the last nail in the German coffin." This was before Hitler began any move to rid the country of these parasites.
At this time, Germany was deep in a terrible depression, which had been brought about by Jewish manipulation of the money market. In 1940, the eminent Rabbi Maurice Perlman, head of the British Section of the World Jewish Congress, told a cheering Canadian audience, as reported by the Toronto Evening News Telegram, February 26, 1940, "The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years." This means they set out to destroy Germany at least two years before Hitler came into power, and used him only as an excuse for continuing the war which cost many Gentiles lives. Very few Jews died in comparison, during World War II.
I can remember many occasions when Jewish boys headed for front line combat duty, were rescued by Jewish Doctors who falsified physical reports, so they ended up usually in the Quartermaster Corps, where they were the heart of the Black Market during the war.
Dr. Donald C. Blaisdeil, professor of Government at the College of the City of New York, published an important document entitled "AMERICAN POLICY FOR THE NEAR EAST." in the Jewish publication "ISSUES", the official organ for the American Council for Judaism, in the fall of 1959, in which he stated, "No minority of Irish, of German, of Polish, Italian, or Greek extraction has been able to manipulate policy to its advantage as have the Zionist leaders of the American Jews."
During World War II, the Administration of (Jewish) President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was literally over run with Zionist Jews and more and more evidence has surfaced through the intervening years, to show that President Roosevelt deliberately lead America into that war against the wishes of the majority of it's people, and did it at the behest of Zionism.
The Hon. Henry L. Stinson, Secretary of Defense during World War II, wrote in his daily diary for November 21, 1941, two weeks before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, that the President had told his Cabinet that morning in a White House meeting, that he wanted us at war with Japan, but that he did not want it to appear that the United States had fired the first shots. This was during the period of his fireside chats, in which he told American fathers and mothers, "I hate wah, and will nevah send American boys to fight on fawn soil, nevah! nevah! nevah!" As he spoke these words, he was planning to get us involved under heavy Jewish pressure. What better word for these actions than TREASON!
After World War II, (Jewish ) President Harry Truman carried on in Roosevelt's footsteps and used the power and prestige of American government, to recognize an armed uprising of 800,000 armed Jewish alien terrorists, who had been transplanted as part of the Zionist plan. On May 15, 1948, Truman gave official recognition to the "bandit state of the Israeli", which has been a "thorn in our side ever since", and cost us billions in national wealth, and possibly a Third World War in the near future. Today the Israeli's are carrying out a war of systematic genocide against the Arab people. While President Clinton took us into an undeclared war in Bosnia, against genocide of Moslem Albanians, he seems to care little for what the Israeli's are doing to the lawful owners of the Palestinian land they have misappropriated, and the Christian world has given them it's blessing based on God's promise made to Abraham, who as we know was not a Jew, Genesis 12:3. How awfully stupid can Christians become, when they allow themselves to be seduced by Christ's enemy.
When Eisenhower, "the terrible Swedish Jew", became President, he was also faithful to the Jews who helped put him into office. In 1956, he sent 14,000 American troops into Lebanon and stationed the Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean, to protect the Israeli's. Since then, they have "stabbed us in the back" many times, by selling our military secrets to our enemies, and even attacked one of our unarmed naval ships in the Mediterranean with the loss of many American lives. Note: They knew about the bombing of the Marines an hour before it happened.
The pathway of political lies to the American people, continued under John F. Kennedy, always under the guidance of Jews who were a power in Washington. These were more interested in the welfare and safety of the illegal Israeli State in Palestine, than in the safety of the United States. At the same time while helping the Israeli's to increase in military power, Administration after Administration, under Jewish pressure have weakened our Armed Forces, until today we could not defend ourselves against a major attack. Much of this weakening process took place when the KGB "double agent", (homosexual) Henry Kissinger was in Washington as Secretary of State. He still a power in the nation's Capitol.
The pathway to Jewish domination continued under the Administration of John F. Kennedy who was always under the guidance of Jews in power in Washington. They were more interested in welfare of the Jewish State in Palestine, then that of the nation they had sworn to defend, and while we armed the Jewish State with our most sophisticated weapons; already the process of destroying our own military was under way and has continued until today we can not be classified as a first rate nation as far as national defense is concerned.
In 1938, the senior Kennedy, Joseph, was America's Ambassador to England. He reported to Washington that Neville Chamberlain, then British Prime Minister, had told him that it was the Jews in America, who forced Britain into the Second World War, and were attempting to do the same thing with the United States. Since this information had to be suppressed at all costs, F.D.R. recalled Senator Joseph Kennedy to silence him and this was the beginning of his liquidation as a viable politician.
The story of Jewish control continued through the Nixon, Carter, and Reagan Administrations. From the Administration of F.D.R. which included 52 Jews in high government positions, out of a total of 72 advisors - and many of these were foreign born Jews like Henry Kissinger - we went on to see the most conservative President in this Century, leaning on Jews and Zionist stooges, for his top level information.
There is much documented information which confirms these allegations and proves that the ideals of Roosevelt's New Deal, were written by Jews. Not to mention a vast amount of similar legislation put out by the U.S. State Department, which at this time was riddled with Communist Jews. When F.D.R. was warned about this, he turned furiously on the Senator reporting to him, shouting, "There's nothing wrong with Communist Jews, many of them are my friends."
As early as 1936, the Jewish newspaper DER TAG, wrote on April 9, 1936, "The Jews of America, because of their numbers, interest, and ability, constitute a great political force. They have not usurped this power; it belongs to them as a right! They are going to exercise it as they see fit. What are you goyim going to do about it?"
This is typical Jewish chutzpah. Rather than endure the smears that would come their way through the Jewish controlled media and the Zionist lobbyists, many members of Congress have been willing to sell future generations of Americans into virtual slavery under the proposed One World Government of Zionism. Spineless creatures, engrossed with the egotism of the importance of their positions and believing they are the all wise mentors of the nation, they have become guilty of the grossest of hypocrisy, as they have often deliberately evaded the one and most important foundation of most of our problems. As a result of failing to strike at the root of the problem, they are today presiding over the destruction of their own White Race, with few qualms of conscience.
Many members of Congress, show by their actions, that they desire this life of hypocrisy and leave this major issue to others. Thus our internal enemy has had an open field in which he is moving rapidly towards his goal of One World control.
Communism - the major tentacle of the Zionist plan for world conquest, was set up by Jews in 1917. In other places in this book, I have shown how they brag openly about their part in this conspiracy. From the beginning, it has been a Jewish plot to enslave "non-Jew goyim" (cattle) and rule over them.
They will scream to high heaven that this accusation is untrue, but the plan is there, it can be seen and understood if a concerned person will take the time and effort to look for it. This plan is clearly laid out in their holy book, the TALMUD and in numerous Jewish writings. These prove that Jews, as a whole consider themselves to be a superior people who are destined to rule the world, or as their TALMUD says, "When our Messiah comes, every Jew will have 2,000 goyim slaves." That's you brother and sister, they are talking about. A careful study of the Scriptures will prove their guilt, no matter how strong your pastor may proclaim them to be God's Anointed!
It would be well for me at this point to explain the meaning of several words I have already used numerous times. The BABYLONIAN TALMUD, which Jewish leaders say is the "Heart blood of modern Judaism", is a collection of Jewish civil and canonical (religious) laws. It was begun during the Babylonian captivity, when the tribes of Judah and Benjamin were taken captive for seventy years. A new sect rose among the Hebrew worshipers, which became known as the Pharisees and which rapidly rose to become the major power of Judaism. They began a gigantic work which became known as the TALMUD, that was not completed until some 500 years after the time of Christ. It was what He fought against during His life on earth calling it the "tradition of men, that nullifies God's Word." (Matthew 15:3,6,9; Isaiah 29:13; Titus 1:10,14)
This gigantic work of 63 large volumes, fills a twelve foot bookshelf, and is the final authority of Judaism, superseding the Laws of Moses, in any matter dealing with the conduct of Jews worldwide.
Following are a few of these Talmudic teachings. I will give you the volume, and page where they can be found.
First let me tell you what some of the most eminent Jewish Rabbis' have said about the TALMUD. Rabbi Ismael said, "The teachings of the Talmud stand above all other laws. They are more important than the laws of Moses."
Rabbi Menachem, commenting on the Fifth Book said, "The decisions of the Talmud are words of the Living G-d, Jehovah Himself, as He asks the opinion of earthly Rabbis when there are difficulties in heaven." (If this isn't the height of egotism, what is?) Note: They refuse to spell the word God with an o. They also write xmass, instead of Christmas. This is one way a Talmudic Jew gives themselves away.
Tract Mechilla says, "Jehovah Himself studies the Talmud standing, as He has much respect for this book."
KEKUT CHADASZ (171,3) - "It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the law. He who would do it ~:s guilty as though they would destroy the whole world."
SANHEDRIN (59a) - "Every goy who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die."
LIBBRE DAVID (37) - "To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations wouldbe equal to killing all the Jews, for if the goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly."
SHALLOTH-UTSZABOT (17) - "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the goyim asks if our books contain anything against him."
BABA MECIA (114,6) - "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings, but beasts."
SIMEON HADDARSEN (56,D) - "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2,000 goyim slaves."
MIDRASCH TALPIOTH (p 225,L) - "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew, day and night."
NADARINE (20,B) - "A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as a piece of raw meat."
MAMONIDES, JAK CHASAKA (2,2) - "A Jew may misuse a non-Jewess in her state of unbelief." (In other words, rape of a Gentile woman is approved for Jewish men.)
TOSEFA, ABODAH ZARA (8,5) - "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew he is responsible But if a Jew kills a goy he is not responsible."
MISHNA SANHEDRYN (57) - "Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor, but it is not said, 'Thou shalt not injure a goy"'. This is a good example of what the Lord meant when He told the Pharisees that they made the Word of God of non-effect by their traditions. (Matthew 15:9)
SCHULCHAN ARUCH - "A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat, and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may suffer."
SCHULCHAN ARUCH - "Those who do not confess the Torah (law) and the prophets (religious law), must be killed."
SCHULCHAN ARUCH (348) - "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish people, who consequently are entitled to seize it up without scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if it is profitable to him or to Jews in general." You wonder why the Jews treat Arabs with contempt? They are taught that Arabs are mental sewage in their synagogues.
The TORAH is Jewish tradition and instructions or decisions, given to the Pharisee priests, now called Rabbis, as Divine revelation. It was to this group our Lord said, "In vain do they worship Me (God) teaching for doctrine the commandments of men." The TORAH contains the first five books of the Christian Old Testament, known as the Pentateuch.
I must move on from this area of our studies, there are 63 large volumes of this filth and the work is so pornographic in nature it may not be sent through the U.S. mail.
How can a Jew take an oath of loyalty to America, when he is allowed by his religion to lie and disregard this oath if it benefits him or his people?
How can a Jew be expected to act worthy of his calling as an editor, news correspondent, a judge, a lawyer, a banker, an educator, or a politician, if he follows this religious belief? How can a Christian minister be trusted, who backs them in any way?
Why is it that the Jew, who is an oriental, is given more rights than the Japanese, Chinese, or Koreans among us? Sounds to me like rank discrimination. Yet the Jew is supposed to be the defender of Civil rights! What a hypocrisy!
The Jewish founder of modern Communism, Karl Mordecai Marx, said of his people, "In vain do we look for the key to the labyrinth of the Jewish soul in his religion. On the contrary, we must look for the mystery of his religion in the mystery of his nature. What is the basis of Judaism? It is a practical passion and greed for profit! To what can we reduce it's religious worship? To extortion! Who is their real G-d? Cash!"
So to accomplish their plan for world takeover, Jews create wars, revolutions, and depressions as a means of seizing power during the time of chaos. In the Communist textbook "PSYCHO-POLITICS", which I have mentioned before, the plan for the takeover of the United States was laid down in 1934. They said, "Our chief goals are effectively carried forward, which is to proceed with a maximum chaos in the culture of our enemy. This is our first and most effective step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression, and scientific turmoil."
For hundreds of years now, this has been the Jewish plan for World conquest. On instructions laid down by their Grand Sanhedrin in Constantinople from their VENGEANCE PROTOCOL in 1286, they have infiltrated every profession in America. To do this, they have cornered the world supply of gold and have sold the non-Jewish world the fiction that gold is wealth, rather than land and commodities. Today, the entire world bows to the Jewish idol of gold, as much as the Babylonians worshiped Nebuchadnezzar's image of gold in Daniel 3.
By their control of gold, they smear those who refuse to knuckle under to their desires, and shut off the truth concerning news that our people need to know. Note: To illustrate the power Jews have in controlling money, take a look on the back of an American one dollar bill. The 13 stars form a larger Jewish star.
The International Jewish Council which met in Basil, Switzerland in 1879, drew up a far reaching plan entitled "THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION." This was a formula on which they would launch their world offensive. While Jewry and their Christian stooges proclaim this document to be a forgery, they seem to forget that in order to have a forgery, one must first have an original. The forger makes his work as close to the original as possible to fool people. The Jews have never questioned the original PROTOCOL which was written in Hebrew, only the English translation by the Englishman Victor E. Marsden. He was an English journalist who had lived in Russia for many years and was married to a Russian woman. He was a correspondent for the "LONDON MORNING POST", a position he held during the Bolshevik Revolution. He was harassed by the Communists and thrown into the Peter Paul prison. He escaped and eventually was allowed to return to England. His mastery of Russian and Hebrew, made him eminently qualified to translate the PROTOCOLS.
I am inclined to agree with Henry Ford, Sr., when he said, "The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit what is going on." International Zionism has followed them like a blueprint for a hundred years, so they could hardly be bogus.
The ELDERS OF ZION have never been revealed, but are sometimes referred to as the Hidden Hand of Judaism. They are not the Board of Deputies of the Jewish Parliament, or the Universal Israelite Alliance of France, or the American Jewish Congress. The late Walter Rathenau said of them, "Three hundred men, each of whom is known to all others, govern the fate of the world, and they elect their successors from their entourage." As far back as 1844, the Jewish Prime Minister of Britain, under Queen Victoria, the Jew Benjamin Disraeli, whose real name was Israel, wrote, "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." Then he went on to show that all these personages were Jews.
There are documents available from Jewish sources, such as the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Volume 2, 1948 edition, page 102, which show this document and admit to it's Jewishness.
There is much documentary proof that the Russian Revolution was planned, financed, and led by International Jewry. Jacob Schiff, Otto Kahn, and Paul Warburg, all members of the New York firm of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company, advanced nearly $48-million and trained 276 Jewish revolutionaries from New York City's Lower East Side and sent them to Russia to lead the revolution. They passed through Germany, although we were at war with Germany at that time and received permission to do so from Paul Warburg's brother who was Kaiser Wilhelms Chief of Espionage, and the German Chancellor Van Bethman-Hallwig, who was also a Jew.
President Woodrow Wilson (Democrat), was put into office on the basis of Jewish support and $50,000 was put into his campaign fund by the Jew Bernard Baruch. This was in payment for Wilson having signed the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which placed International Jewish banks in charge of the economics of America, and which was the fore runner of our present economic system which is still Jewish controlled. Rockefeller, Rothschild, Kuhn, Loeb, and Lehman are just a few of the names which were involved, with the Rockefeller clan, masquerading as Protestant Christian Gentiles, leading the way.
While most Americans believe the Federal Reserve is part of our government, all of the major banks are Jewish owned, and their geographical dispersion serves as window dressing. All are independent of Federal control and are dependent for international control on the International Jewish bankers.
These banks collect dividends which results in interest payments of the United States government on its bonds sold to Federal Reserve Banks and finances of course, by commercial banks throughout the country, using our money. They have usurped the Constitutional right of Congress to coin and print our money.
Today the United States government pays interest on its credit and the International Jewish bankers collect it and grow rich off the sweat and toil of the American taxpayer. In 1915 our National debt was about $303 million; by 1982, it passed the one trillion dollar mark. Add to this a state debt at this time of some $120 billion, plus God alone knows how much is owed in personal debts, and one can begin to scratch the surface of the robbery that has been carried on under the banner of Judaism. These taxes are collected by the Internal Revenue Service, which is the bully boy tax police of the Federal Reserve, and enforces their tax laws. From a total of $103,651,585 collected in 1970, this has grown to $745,313,276 in 1996. Unfortunately, the I.R.S. is often used by the government and special interests to punish those who do not walk the Jewish line.
A good example is my own case. From 1965, when I retired, to 1981, I was severe vocal and written critic of the Federal Government's bankrupt Foreign and Economic policies, and was an embarrassment to the United States State Department on several occasions. This never drew any unbearable penalties, but when I began to speak publicly on the Jewish perils to our government and the Christian church in 1986, within six months I had my first audit, and there have been seven of these in fifteen years, costing this Christian work over $108,000. Many of you know that in 1998, the I.R.S. placed a levy on my Military Retirement pay, and stole over $24,000 that year, over the protests of several U.S. Senators. These men were falsely told that there was no religious prejudice involved, although facts proved otherwise. This Christian work was kept afloat, only by Christian brethren, who would not let it go down the drain. Some of you who read this book were in this group, and I will never be able to thank you properly. God knows what the future will bring!
Today in the face of almost unheard of economic woes, which persist in spite of what appears to be a booming economy, we see the strange sight of our government borrowing money from the Internationalists at high interest rates, so that we can give it away in Foreign Aid, often to countries who hate us and are our potential enemies, while our President spends untold billions of dollars of national wealth on brush fire wars in which we have no national interest. All these, Bosnia included, are for the benefit of the Internationalists and is fattening their purses, while bringing us closer to their New World Order, scheduled for completion in the year 2000.
It should be obvious to any intelligent person, where the money power lies. It most certainly is not in the hands of Congress where it belongs, and was meant to be. By their control of gold, the International Jewish bankers have become richer in one hour, as White Christians in particular sink deeper into the toils of their Slave State. Today, Christian America is bowing our backs in virtual economic slavery to world Judaism and they glory in it. Americans are today paying a higher percentage of their earnings into taxes, than was paid by the medieval serfs. This was the ultimate plan of PROTOCOLS, "Drain the entire product of materials and labor off the land and into our coffers." How long will we be willing to live on our knees, when God meant us to be FREE! You may be one of those Christians who reasons, "If He meant us to be free, why has He allowed our enemy to take control." Read the 28th Chapter of Deuteronomy and see for yourself. It all boils down to this TRUTH: "Obedience to God, and the discipline it brings, must come before we can have victory!" Until we learn the lesson of obedience, we should not expect to have God's help, no matter how hard we pray! I have Christians tell me, "If we could just get all the Christians in America to pray together, God would hear and answer our prayers and save us!" For this prayer to work you must mix prayer with obedience in what God tells us to do. In Isaiah 59:1 we are told that God has not lost His power to act, nor has He lost His sense of hearing the prayers of His people. Verse 2 of this same Chapter gives us the answer, "But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that He will not hear." Before we can expect God to hear and answer our pleas for deliverance, we must first return to Him in obedience. While many so called Christian people recognize this fact, it soon becomes evident that most of them, including their pastors, are only giving God, lip service, and want to continue doing their own thing!
The only way we can be free from the Jewish plague, is by removing it, and this will be impossible until we first learn obedience.
We know God will be with us if we diligently and honestly seek His face, 2 Chronicles 7:14. He has always been on the side of righteousness, when it is exercised in the context of obedience to His will. Never, during the trials of our ancient forefathers, did He respond to their call for help, until they came to Him in repentance and humility, and unfortunately I have seen very little of this in the so called Christian world of 1999. One of our biggest problems in the Christian world, is that we have grown too big for our britches! God may have to bring us down a notch or two, before He can work His way with us. He has done it before with His people, and if He never changes, as we have been taught, it is very possible He will do it again. I have stopped praying, "God, save us, instead I pray, 'Not my will, but Thine be done."'
We must not be led astray by our hatred for the Jewish people, although we may have good reason for it. our battle must be against the forces of the anti-Christ, that their leaders advocate.
Sometimes it seems that there are no solutions to our problems. The problems are there, and the milder solutions can only come as the Jewish leaders are willing to lift the cloud of censorship they have placed on the Christian world and then back their words with good intentions.
As long as Jews insist on being a Jewish entity, instead of being individuals, they will ultimately force Christians, as a means of self defense, into viewing them as a foreign element hostile to Christian people and Christian values. If America allows a dual citizenship to stand in the way of loyalty to America alone, then Jews will continue not only to be a thorn in our flesh, but an ever increasing danger to our American way of life.
Our freedom was won at too great a price, to allow it to be usurped by aliens in our midst, who have taken advantage of our hospitality. This goes for other groups too.
The Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and press, to American citizens. It does not allow an alien minority to take this away by imposing their censorship. If we allow this to happen, and it's well along the way towards completion, then we deserve everything we get.
Today, as the greatest drama of the Ages begins to unfold before us, there are two paths we can choose. The one is lined with the trinkets and glamour of Jewry, the big brother will take care of you, philosophy which always leads to slavery. Those who seek only personal pleasure and comforts, those fools who believe, "You only go around once in life, so live with gusto, for tomorrow you may die." These will find only slavery and death at the end of their road. It is only the pathway of sacrifice and obedience to God, that comes from loyalty, courage, honor, and a sense of duty, that leads to a more abundant life.
We are offered two options, Either serve God with gladness, knowing His word is true, or follow a path which will only serve the oppressors of our people.
Today in America, we are faced with oppressive, anti-Christ government. Will we serve it? Our forefathers refused to do so! In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson said that, "We are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable (may not be tampered with by government for any reason) rights. That among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever government becomes destructive to these ends it becomes the right of the people to alter and abolish it and institute a new government."
The fact that we are free today, gives us the right to establish and maintain a government which will enable us to enjoy these rights, so aptly expressed by the political philosopher, John Locke. Not only is it our right, but it is our duty. Jefferson said, "When a long train of abuses, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, nay it is their duty, to throw off such a government and provide new safeguards for their future security."
Today, under the despotism of William Jefferson (Jewish)Clinton, we are living under such a government. Our first allegiance must be to God. It is His law and the unalienable rights under that Law, which make us a free people. We cannot afford for our allegiance now, or at any time in the future, to come under bondage to an alien philosophy that seeks to enslave and destroy us.
In 1 Kings 18:21, the prophet Elijah asked our forefathers, "How long halt you between two opinions? If the Lord be God follow Him: but if Baal, then follow him." Five hundred years before Elijah's time, Joshua told the people of Israel, "If it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom you will serve;... but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." (Joshua 24:15)
This is the decisions White Christians in particular must make today, if we are to survive. Will we serve Jehovah, the God of our forefathers, and His Son the Lord Jesus Christ and remain free? Or will we bow the knee to the false god of the Talmudic Jews and become slaves? Our whole future, and that of our race, depends on how we answer this question.
For far to long, we have been under the spell of the Baal system of Babylonian usury, It is in the process now of deliberately producing a "raceless, soulless humanity," that can be controlled by the elite in the New World Order of Judaism. This will mean control over income, our children, our entertainment, our sex life, our education, our body, our politics, and our religion. Already the New World Elite have openly stated that there will be no place for Christians in their New World.
I say the time has come when we must stop it. It will only happen when Christian men and women know the truth, recognize it as truth, and operate on this basis. It cannot happen, as long as most of the church world is under bondage, and control of Judaism, as it is today!
The time is late, the situation seems hopeless at times, but so was the situation in 1775 when Patrick Henry, speaking before the Virginia Convention, in an attempt to rally his people to the cause of freedom, shouted for all the world to hear, "They tell us sirs, that we are weak, unable to cope with some formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be next year? Will it be when we have been totally disarmed, and a British guard is stationed in every house?" This is what the Jews seek in America today. They are in the forefront of every effort towards gun control and total disarmament. Christian America: "How long will you halt between two opinions?" Will you finally believe when you see enemy hordes marching through our streets, raping our women and destroying our homes and churches?
Today, our Christian people are asleep. They are in a dream world, where they imagine that bad things will not happen to them. They see devastating earthquakes in Turkey and Greece, and say, "It will not happen to us!" They see mass murders by governments in Southeast Asia and Africa, and say, "That will not happen here! We are born again, you know, and Jesus will come back and RAPTURE us away before if gets all that bad!" Talk about being wrapped up in a sheet of self-righteousness, those Christians are enclosed in a shroud and don't know it. Like the folks in Isaiah 28 their church leaders have "made a covenant with death, and with hell are in agreement; when the overflowing scourge (disaster) shall pass through, (they say), it shall not come nigh us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves." What does God have to say about this complacent attitude? The answer is in verses 17 and 18 "Judgment also will I (God) lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place. And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, (canceled) and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it." Still so-called born again Christians who say they believe God's Word, will tell you with a straight face, "It will not happen to America, because we have too many born again Christians here!" How dangerously complacent can we get?
While our preachers indicate that they don't know who the Jews are, and erroneously call them God's Chosen, our risen Savior said of them in Revelations 2:9 - "...I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews, and are not, but are of the synagogue (meeting place) of Satan." He will take care of them in His own good time as indicated in Luke 19:27, and in His Parable of the Sower in Matthew 13:30. He indicated here that if we attempt to uproot them before their time, it will harm the wheat.
Will it take God's destruction of His enemies, to waken our Christians, or will it take disaster to befall them?
Are you willing to have your family live under the rulership of International Jewry, now that you know the truth about them? In the face of slavery and very possibly death. WHAT WILL YOUR ANSWER BE?
The day of decision is fast approaching, when Satan's Kids, will make an all out effort to control the Christian world. Their time schedule calls for it to happen in the year 2000. It may be necessary for us to take stern measures in order to stop this anti-Christ scourge. For whether you want to admit it or not, we are in extreme danger as a free people. Soon this war will end. With promises like Romans 8:28; 2 Timothy 1:7; and Luke 21:28, we have nothing to fear.. For no matter how heavy the odds against us may be we will be VICTORIOUS, when we learn to be obedient! Are you going to be on the winning side? Or will you be one of the church rebels who refuses to believe God's Word, and will not make into His kingdom, no matter how solid your church membership may be? Please never say you weren't warned!

Choose you this day whom you will serve!

Part 1

"When a Jew, in America or in South Africa, talks to his Jewish companions about 'our' government, he means the government of Israel."

- David Ben-Gurion, Israeli Prime Minister

Palestine banner
Viva Palestina!

Latest Additions - in English
What is this Jewish carnage really about? - The background to atrocities
Videos on Farrakhan, the Nation of Islam and Blacks and Jews
How Jewish Films and Television Promotes bias Against Muslims
Judaism is Nobody's Friend
Judaism is the Jews' strategy to dominate non-Jews.
Islam and Revolution
By Ahmed Rami
Jewish Manipulation of World Leaders - Photos
Elie Wiesel - A Prominent False Witness
By Robert Faurisson
The Gaza atrocity 2008-2009

Iraq under Jewish occupation
Iraq - war and occupation

Jewish War against Lebanon!
Jew Goldstone appointed by UN to investigate War Crimes in Gaza
Hasbara - The Jewish manual for media deceptions
Britain under Jewish occupation!

Jewish World Power
West Europe    East Europe
Americas          Asia
Middle East       Africa
      U.N.              E.U.
  The Internet and Israeli-Jewish infiltration/manipulations
Books - Important collection of titles
The Power of Jews in France
The Israel Lobby - From the book
Jews and Crime  - The archive!

When Jews rule...
The best book on Jewish Power

Sayanim - Israel's and Mossad's Jewish helpers abroad
Listen to Louis Farrakhan's Speech - A must hear!
The Israeli Nuclear Threat
The "Six Million" Myth
Jewish "Religion" - What is it?
Medias in the hands of racists
Strauss-Kahn - IMF chief and member of Israel lobby group
Down with Zio-Apartheid
StopJewish Apartheid!
Zionism | J