For President Bush's policy implemented in the "war on terror" against al-Qaeda and "branches", it is surprising that President Obama targets the secular Syrian government in order to "regime change."
It is surprising also an ally of Obama's military the strongest on the ground in Syria - any fighting force best equipped and most influential against the Syrian government - is "Front victory," a group linked to al Qaeda and aims to convert Syria to the State of Islamist extremist working to impose a fundamentalist of Sharia law .
It is difficult to know exactly how I got the victory over front arms, but one can guess based on the data available. He explained "The New York Times" busily detail "CIA" on the process of charging a huge quantity of weapons, including thousands of tons of weapons that have been transferred from Saudi Arabia and Qatar to Syria:
"The role of 'CIA' to facilitate the ship [weapons] ... gave the United States a degree of influence on the process of distribution of weapons ... U.S. officials have confirmed that White House officials were on the lookout for a permanent shipments [weapons]" .
Where to go these weapons in the process of transferring this huge weapons? Must ask an important question here: Any rebels in Syria possess weapons, and any of them do not have the weapons? Says, "The Guardian":
"The lack of 'Free Syrian Army' [secular] for weapons and other resources compared with the 'victory Front' jihadist theme is addressed to it on an ongoing basis ... 'If I joined to the front of the victory, you'll get your weapon but most of the Brigades' Syrian army free 'can not secure the lead for the fighters,' ... has joined the 3,000 fighters of the 'Free Syrian Army' to the front of the victory in the last few months, due to the lack of weapons and ammunition ... rarely victory fighters withdraw because of a shortage of ammunition ... "
Although it is difficult to know whether the weapons carried by the "CIA" link directly or indirectly to the front of the victory, it is very likely that these weapons reach directly to the people uncles victory ideologues, including the majority of the Syrian rebels from Islamist extremists.
For example, when I made the magazine "The Economist" description of militant groups in Syria, in her essay "of fighting in Syria," pointed out - a kind of regret - that the Islamist group is not only present in the Kurdish areas, an area independent. As for the militant group backed by the United States, "the senior military leadership", it has recognized the "Economist" that "very limited control over the earth." Remember that the magazine "The Economist" strongly supports the intervention of the U.S. and NATO military in Syria.
It also stressed the "New York Times" on the complete domination of the extremists in the ranks of the rebels:
"There is no in any area in the rebel-controlled Syria any fighter secular power to remember."
Thus, the secular rebel fighters, who make up the minority, do not drive the civil war, and will not reach the power in the event of the fall of Assad. As the real revolutionaries Syrians will immediately fall victim to extremists who Cisaron to liquidate their former allies. It has become clear now that Obama's foreign policy in Syria encourages terrorism effectively.
Are several areas in Syria now under the control of rebel safe shelters for terrorists, has been carried out hundreds of terrorist bombings against the Syrian government many of which targeted civilian areas. While cranking U.S. arms to areas controlled by jihadists, has ignored also the atrocities committed by these rebels and documented on "YouTube", which includes a large number of war crimes, including beheadings and mass executions of prisoners, ethnic cleansing, and the recent incident where he was filming a rebel leaders known for cutting off the body of Syrian troops and eats his heart.
Through minimize the importance of these barbaric acts, Obama administration emphasizes continuity, including extremists backed by the United States and the American media are protected from international political pressures. The question that does not think the American media to ask is: Where did all these Islamist extremists and why? As long as the opposition was Syria's Sunni Muslim religious moderate, which means that the majority of foreign extremists.
The ideological extremism of the religious figures Saudi Arabia and its allies who use Islam as a political tool to target countries "unfriendly" to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United States. A good example of this in the Syrian case fatwa issued by 107 sheikhs and condemning the Syrian government and encourages Muslims to fight them. Encourages this fatwa to jihad, despite the fact that the word "jihad" did not remember.
It says this fatwa:
"It is the duty of all Muslims to support the rebels in Syria against the government to be able to successfully end the revolt and to obtain their rights and freedom."
There is an obvious hypocrisy in this opinion: Saudis who signed this document, which calls for "freedom" in Syria are not clamoring for freedom in Saudi Arabia, the least free country in the whole world.
In addition to supplying Saudi Arabia and Qatar for the rebels Syrian arms - with the help "CIA" - offering religious figures Arabia associated with the system Saudi support religious / political cross mislead Muslims and push them to go to Syria to attack the country's Islamic leading to sectarian divisions large see landmarks now all over the world Islamic. Saudi Arabia to export most of these sectarian war, Islamic, where they work on school funding Islamist extremists throughout the Middle East, which attracts the poor of these countries through the provision of basic social services that fail these countries presented either because they are poor or because they do not want to present.
There is an important chapter on this subject in the book ڤijay براشاد wonderful "history of the peoples of the Third World." The debate now in the United States and NATO countries focused on giving more sophisticated weapons to the rebels in Syria extremists. The Obama administration has been pressing the EU to lift the arms embargo on Syria so that flood the country with a stream of arms (it seems that the processes of "CIA" did not sink Syria after weapons).
In response to the discussion, "the lifting of the ban" debate, said in a statement, "Oxfam" smartphone:
"The dispatch of weapons to the Syrian opposition will not create a playground for fun. Instead, it will enable everyone to take up arms, which will go killed civilians Syrians. We have learned from our experiences in the areas of other conflicts that this crisis will last for a longer time in the event of pumping more weapons in Syria . "
He has a European Union diplomats scolds the Obama administration to claim their ability to ensure that no new weapons falling into "the wrong hands" in Syria:
"This will be the first conflict pretend it that we can bring peace by sending weapons. If you pretend that you know where to go weapons, it would be the first war in history where this is possible. Has seen it before in Bosnia, Afghanistan and Iraq. Weapons do not disappear ; It shows wherever they are needed. "
In Syria, these weapons needs of those who are fighting on the ground. Once again, everyone admits that the victory extremists make up the combat force acting against the Syrian government, and therefore the arms will go to them.
Push Obama proverb "friend of my enemy my friend" to unreasonable levels, which helps it to produce a new generation of Islamist extremists will contribute to fueling the "war on terror" led by the United States, which it seems they will not stop.
The real purpose behind the "war on terror" is not put an end to the terrorists, but targeting countries anti-American foreign policy: where Iraq and Libya - such as Syria - two laymen when they faced invasion; was also the invasion of Afghanistan despite the fact that most of those involved in the attacks of 9 / 11 were from Saudi Arabia.
There were not any problems of terrorism in Iraq before the U.S. invasion, and were not a problem of terrorism in Syria before they appear on the scene rebels backed by the United States. Clear to most Americans that Syria and Iran occupy the forefront on the list of Obama's war, which constitute a priority over important given to any terrorist group. This is Obama who pays for Scott for terrorist groups in Syria: they will use as a tool against his real goal, Syria and Iran later.
You must let the Syrian people decide their own future. The United States is completely incapable of "help" countries through the use of military means, as demonstrated torn countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya are deplorable. Global movement must be anti-war cry aloud:
Hands off Syria!