Sunday, May 11, 2014

Denmark Saves $10 Billion by Restricting Third World Immigration

Denmark Saves $10 Billion by Restricting Third World Immigration

But where will this Soldier of Allah go?
But where will this Soldier of Allah go?
Denmark has a population of less than 6 million. Imagine how much the United States could save if it stopped importing welfare cases. (via Religion of Peace)
Denmark’s strict immigration laws have saved the country billions in benefits, a government report has claimed. The Integration Ministry report has now led to calls among right-wing populists to clamp down further on immigrants to increase the savings.
The extremely strict laws have dramatically reduced the flow of people into Denmark in recent years, and many government figures are delighted with the outcome. “Now that we can see that it does matter who comes into the country, I have no scruples in further restricting those who one can suspect will be a burden on Denmark,” the center-right liberal integration minister, Søren Pind, told the Jyllands Posten newspaper.
Pind was talking after the ministry’s report — initiated by the right-wing populist Danish People’s Party (DPP) — came to the conclusion that by tightening immigration laws, Denmark has saved €6.7 billion ($10 billion) over the last 10 years, money which otherwise would supposedly have been spent on social benefits or housing. According to the figures, migrants from non-Western countries who did manage to come to Denmark have cost the state €2.3 billion, while those from the West have actually contributed €295 million to government coffers.
But the report has sparked outrage from opposition parties like the centrist Social Liberal Party, which dismissed it as undignified and discriminatory. The party’s integration spokeswoman, Marianne Jelved, said: “A certain group of people is being denounced and being blamed for our deficit, being made into whipping boys.”
She added: “We cannot classify people depending on their value to the economy. That is degrading in a democracy that has a basic value of equality.”
Actually yes you can and should. Immigrants should provide a net benefit to the country. It’s possible to evaluate the net benefit and loss for immigrants from a given country or group. And immigration targets should be set based on the net benefit from that group while restricting groups that are a net loss.
These figures should be calculated based on taxes paid, social services used, added cost of crime prevention, native job creation, etc…
Some immigrants have already turned their back on Denmark voluntarily. Increasing numbers of Somalis are moving away, especially to the UK
Just think of all the murders, rapes, thefts and welfare fraud… not to mention bombings, Denmark is missing out on.
Now maybe UK voters will follow suit and the Somalis will go home. Or to Maine and Minnesota.
In November, the government agreed to stricter laws and made the entry of immigrants’ spouses more difficult. Only those who collect enough “points” may come to Denmark in the future — with points being determined by factors such as academic qualifications and proof of language proficiency. In addition, the equivalent of €13,000 must be deposited with the state in the form of a bank guarantee to cover any future public assistance. Socially deprived areas with a disproportionately high number of immigrants will be subject in future to a so-called “ghetto strategy” designed to prevent high concentrations of foreigners in public housing areas. Migrants will be assigned housing, and three-year-old children who do not speak Danish well enough will be required to attend state child care.
The number of asylum seekers and relatives of immigrants seeking entry into Denmark dropped by more than two-thirds within nine years as a result of the tough laws.

Video: Australian border control dealing with aggressive Muslim about time we need to start doing that here fed them to gators

Video: Australian border control dealing with aggressive Muslim

1 Vote

Australian Border Control is fantastic and should be rewarded. They do need be handed additional power to deport some of these criminalized and aggressive Muslims and immigrants on the spot.
It’s not too hard to tell this Muslim seriously despise the Australian people – the kafirs. Just look at the venom in that look. Aggressive Arab at the Airport in Australia caught with knives, hidden tasers, and other gang paraphernalia. “I’ll knock you flat mate. Believe me,” he threatens the Customs Official for asking him about the taser concealed in a cell phone casing. Why don’t they file charges against this obvious danger to society and pack the bags of his entire clan and send them back to their desert dwellings?
Watch the aggression and arrogance. You find this same attitude in Muslims all across the West, the provocative and aggressive attitude. Muslims who constitute a small majority are the largest prison population wherever they go. Not hard to see why. Muslims are deeply engaged in their Jew-hatred meaning they fill the internet with constant propaganda and have posted this as a “Jew” but this is an Arab Muslim who appears to be an Australian citizen. His features (they are deeply inbred) reveal he may be of Palestinian or Jordanian descent.
Some Muslim students revealed to us that funding from Arabs and mosques PAY Muslim students all across the West to troll and spread anti-Western, anti-government and anti-Jewish propaganda through the internet – on forums, videos, news commentaries, blogs, etc., and always under a non-Arab sounding name or profile using fake profile pictures often of Western women. They often  target to mislead teenagers to become anti-government and anti-Jewish by spewing endless propaganda.
The 9/11 conspiracy theories is one example of a major Arab funded propaganda which used Western hired and paid narrators to Muslim taglines to breed conspiracies. Propaganda later gets picked up by the naive public who regurgitate it in many new formats. Anti-American government propaganda is another huge movement Muslims are engaged in, again under false profiles and names nearly always pretending to be ‘white Americans’. So be careful of what you read out there and try and find the original source behind it. [h/t to Miller for sending the link].

Share this:



Published: .
JehJohnson-550x309The Obama administration appears to have a terrorist “hands off” list that permits individuals with extremist ties to enter the country, according to internal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) documents obtained by a United States Senator.
It’s unimaginable that any government would do this, but it seems like the Obama administration is constantly breaking new ground. The disturbing details of this secret initiative were made public this week by Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, who has obtained DHS electronic mail discussing what could be a terrorist “hands off” list. The exchange includes a 2012 email chain between U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) asking whether to admit an individual with ties to various terrorist groups. The individual had scheduled an upcoming flight into the U.S., according to an announcement issued by the senator.
The person was believed to be a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and a close associate and supporter Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, according to the mail exchange obtained by Grassley’s office. The terrorist suspect had also been in secondary inspection “several dozen times of the past several years,” the agency emails reveal, but had not undergone a secondary inspection since 2010. This seems to imply that the suspect has been on the U.S. government’s radar for some time.
It gets better. The DHS emails also reveal that this particular terrorism suspect has actually taken legal action against the U.S., presumably because authorities violated the hands off policy. The subject “has sued CBP twice in the past and that he’s one of the several hands off passengers nationwide,” according to the DHS emails obtained by Senator Grassley’s office. The documents go on to say that the terrorist’s records were removed and that the DHS Secretary (at the time Janet Napolitano) was involved in the matter.
This is pure insanity and the senator has tried for months to get answers from DHS. In February he wrote a letter to DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson saying this: “I’m puzzled how someone could be a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial, be an associate of [redacted], say that the US is staging car bombings in Iraq and that [it] is ok for men to beat their wives, question who was behind the 9/11 attacks, and be afforded the luxury of a visitor visa and de-watchlisted. It doesn’t appear that we’ll be successful with denying him entry tomorrow but maybe we could re-evaluate the matter in the future since the decision to de-watchlist him was made 17 months ago.”

            Here’s the text of Grassley’s February 3, 2014 letter:
  A signed copy can be found here.  The response from Customs and Border Protection can be found here.
February 3, 2014
The Honorable Jeh Johnson
Department of Homeland Security
3801 Nebraska Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20528
Dear Secretary Johnson:
    My office recently received copies of disturbing internal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) e-mails regarding the admittance of individuals into the United States with potential ties to terrorism.
The May 2012 e-mail chain between U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) surrounds the question of whether to admit someone who had scheduled an upcoming flight into the U.S.  Allegedly, the individual was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and a “close associate” of a supporter of “Hamas, Hizbollah, and (Palestinian) Islamic Jihad.”  According to the same e-mail, the individual had been in secondary inspection “several dozen times of the past several years,” but had not had a secondary inspection since 2010.
One of the responses to the initial e-mail states: “The [CBP National Targeting Center (NTC)] Watch Commander advised that the subject has sued CBP twice in the past and that he’s one of the several hands off passengers nationwide. . . .  Apparently his records were removed in December 2010 and the DHS Secretary was involved in the matter.”   The e-mail continues:
I’m puzzled how someone could be a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial, be an associate of [redacted], say that the US is staging car bombings in Iraq and that [it] is ok for men to beat their wives, question who was behind the 9/11 attacks, and be afforded the luxury of a visitor visa and de-watchlisted.  It doesn’t appear that we’ll be successful with denying him entry tomorrow but maybe we could re-evaluate the matter in the future since the decision to de[-]watchlist him was made 17 months ago.
In order to understand the events described in these e-mails, please provide the Committee with answers to the following questions:
1)    Why was this individual removed from the watchlist in December 2010?
2)    Please describe the nature, extent, and reasons for the involvement of the DHS Secretary or her staff in the removal of the individual from the watchlist.
3)    What is the current watchlist status of this individual?
4)    How many people are on the “hands off” list mentioned in the email?
5)    What qualifies someone to receive the “hands off” designation?
6)    Does filing a lawsuit result in being designated “hands off” and thus avoiding secondary security screenings?
7)    Who makes the determination that an individual should be considered “hands off”?
I would appreciate receiving answers to these questions by March 3, 2014.  Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Tristan Leavitt of my staff at (202) 224-5225.  I look forward to your prompt response.
Charles E. Grassley
Ranking Member

BREAKING: White House Hiding Documents Exposing Benghazi Cover Up

Over the past several days, we’ve discussed with you how the White House is actively planning to subvert and stonewall and undermine the House’s efforts to hold the executive branch accountable on Benghazi.
Just this morning, Secretary of State John Kerry indicated that he won’t comply with the subpoena he’s been issued, citing a “scheduling” issue that prevented him from attending a hearing.
Yesterday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney indicated that the White House may very well refuse to cooperate with the Trey Gowdy and the select committee’s investigation.
This shouldn’t surprise us, as it took an FOIA lawsuit in the first place to obtain the emails that showed that the White House planned the Benghazi coverup from the start, and this is exactly why Gowdy is getting the “strongest authority possible” to subpoena witnesses and go across jurisdictional boundaries in order to finally get the truth.
Now, we’re learning that the White House is deliberately hiding other emails which discuss how to respond to media reports that the White House knew about Benghazi being a terrorist attack almost immediately.
Via Fox News Insider:
The Obama administration is said to be withholding emails in which officials apparently discussed how to respond to media coverage in the weeks after the Benghazi attack. The email chain, which included top White House officials Denis McDonough, John Brennan, and Ben Rhodes, was dated Sept. 27-28, 2012 and is believed to have referenced a report by Fox News’ chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge.
Herridge wrote the following on Gretawire today:
Fox news learning new details of a seven page email — circulated at the highest levels of the white house – apparently to come up with a media strategy to deal with a fox news report- is being withheld by the state department, citing executive branch deliberations.
The report, which is the subject line of the emails, “Fox News: US officials knew Libya attack was terrorism within 24 hours, sources confirm” was circulated September 27th and September 28th 2012 concluded the intelligence community knew Benghazi was terrorism within 24 hours.
On the email chain, among others, Denis McDonough, the president’s deputy national security adviser during Benghazi, John Brennan former White House counterterrorism adviser and now CIA Director, then deputy director of the CIA Michael Morell, and presidential aide Ben Rhodes who sent the email September 14th 2012, critics say, attempted to shape the public discussion of Benghazi.
Chris Farrell with Judicial Watch which is suing for the documents, including the email related to the Fox News report, said “A 7-page dialogue concerning one Fox News report to me uh demonstrates um an alarm bell situation where they are reacting to and trying to shape a response or commentary to react to or to shut down reporting.”
“The reporting itself would appear to be at odds or at least to challenge strongly the White House position that had been announced. And so this report from Fox News would run counter to what the Obama administration was attempting to put out there as their position.”

This falls right in line with what we know about Obama’s attempt to censor Fox News coverage of the Benghazi scandal.  He even threatened to destroy a reporter’s career for aggressively pursuing the story.
This email may very well be the document that is literally the smoking gun of the entire thing.  If it indicates that Fox News found out exactly what the White House didn’t want them to find out and Obama’s spin doctors were plotting a way to deal with it, there’s undeniable proof of a coverup.
We have to hope this lawsuit is successful, and that the select committee is also able to get more information to blow this scandal wide open.
Please share this article on Facebook and Twitter to spread the word about the document which might just be the smoking gun of the entire Benghazi scandal.


Boko Haram Released Muslim Girls, Kept Christians, Slicing Throats of Those Who Refuse To Convert To Islam…

Boko Haram Released Muslim Girls, Kept Christians, Slicing Throats of Those Who Refuse To Convert To Islam…

One of those inconvenient facts Mooch failed to mention during her address.
Via Vanguard News:
Now that the operational leadership and visible face of Boko Haram, in the person of the filth called Mr. Abubakar Shekau (aka Darul Tawheed), has finally admitted that they were responsible for the abduction of hundreds of our school girls and that they intend to ‘’sell them in the market like slaves’’, it is pertinent and necessary for us to consider some of the emerging, though uncomfortable, facts.
This will enable us to understand the nature of who and what we are dealing with and allow us to consider what the appropriate response ought to be if we really want to solve the problem. Permit me to share the following facts that have been brought to my attention:
1. That the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has told us that 90 per cent of the girls that were abducted from their school at Chibok were Christians.
2. That President Goodluck Jonathan himself alluded to this during his last media chat when he said that ‘’the majority’’ of girls that were abducted were Christians.
3. That the majority of the girls that either ‘’escaped’’ or were released by their abductors were Muslims.
4. That the Governor of Borno State refused to accept the counsel and abide by the directives of WAEC that the exams should not take place in Chibok due to the precarious security situation and instead he insisted that the exams should take place there and that he would guarantee the security of the children.
5. That the Christian Association of Nigeria has formally accused the Governor of Borno State of ‘’conspiracy and collusion’’ and they have urged him to tell us exactly where the girls are and what he knows about the whole incident.
6. That the girls that have been kidnapped are being raped up to 15 times a day by their captors and that those amongst them that have refused to convert to Islam are having their throats cut (read the testimony of one of the girls that ‘’escaped’’ on page 8 of the Vanguard Newspaper, 5th April, 2014).
7. That there was not a single adult in the school grounds watching over the 278 girls that entire night apart from one security man and that there was no electricity, no generator, no principal, no matron, no house master and no house mistress in the grounds with them.
8. That the children were all alone in their dormitories that night in the blistering heat and deepest darkness before the Haramites arrived to burn their school and carried them away into captivity.
9. That the soldiers that were guarding the school in Chibok were redeployed a few hours before Boko Haram launched their attack and abducted the children.
10. That up till now pictures of the abducted girls have not been produced or released by the school authorities or the state government.
Keep reading…


Britain First Defence Force activists have invaded multiple mega mosques across Bradford, Yorkshire. More updates shortly!

State Department: U.S. Officers Killed 2 Yemeni Civilians in Shootout

State Department: U.S. Officers Killed 2 Yemeni Civilians in Shootout

Yemenis gather at the site of a bomb explosion that targeted an army troop vehicle on its way to man a checkpoint on a street leading to two western embassies on May 9, 2014 in the capital Sanaa. Mohammed Huwais—AFP/Getty Images

Two U.S. officers shot and killed two Yemeni civilians during a botched kidnapping attempt, the State Department said Saturday. The incident raises tensions at a time when the Yemeni government is unpopular with the local population for allowing American drone strikes

Two American embassy officers shot and killed two Yemeni civilians trying to kidnap the Americans in Yemen’s capital last month, a State Department spokesperson confirmed to the New York Times Saturday. The pair of Americans involved in the incident have since left the country, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf told the Times.
The Times first reported the incident Friday, citing unnamed American officials. The original Times report claimed the attempted kidnapping and subsequent shootout involved a U.S. Special Operations commando and a Central Intelligence Agency officer attached to the U.S. Embassy in Yemen and took place at a Sanaa barber shop.
The incident comes at a tumultuous time for Yemen’s embattled government. Yemeni President Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi has lost popularity among many Yemenis by allowing American drone strikes against suspected al-Qaeda members. The strikes, which sometimes result in civilian deaths, are fiercely unpopular among Yemenis, and militants have stepped up their attacks against the government in response to the drone strikes.
Yemeni officials have remained largely silent about the shootings, though a spokesman for Yemen’s Interior Ministry said Saturday that two non-Yemeni foreigners targeted for abduction fired on their Yemini would-be abductors. Yemeni media did not report at the time that the shooters were American.
The episode could further damage the Yemeni government’s domestic reputation if it is perceived that it covered up the identities of the American officers.

11 Islamic Terrorists Arrested in the Disappearance of Malaysia Flight MH370

11 Islamic Terrorists Arrested in the Disappearance of Malaysia Flight MH370

You are not surprised, are you? Where's the plane?  Where are the people? Eleven terrorists with links to Al Qaeda have been arrested on suspicion of being involved in the disappearance of MH370, according to the Daily Mail.
  • Suspects were arrested in the capital Kuala Lumpur and the state of Kedah
  • Said to members of violent new terror group said to be planning attacks
  • Interrogations came after demands from agencies, including FBI and MI6
  • Manifest revealed presence of consignment but did not reveal its contents
  • Airline has admitted 200kg of lithium batteries was among the items
  • It refused to say what else, citing 'legal reason' related to 'ongoing' probe
Richard Shears reports:
A group of 11 terrorists with links to Al Qaeda were yesterday being interrogated on whether they are behind the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370.

The suspects were arrested in the capital Kuala Lumpur and in the state of Kedah last week and are members of a violent new terror group said to be planning bomb attacks in Muslim countries.

The interrogations come after international investigators, including the FBI and MI6, asked for the militants, whose ages range from 22 to 55 and include students, odd-job workers, a young widow and business professionals, to be questioned intensively about Flight MH370.

Nearly two months after the Beijing-bound plane vanished soon after take-off from Kuala Lumpur, no trace has been found despite a huge sea search costing hundreds of millions of pounds. It is thought to have crashed into the Indian Ocean with 239 people on board.

An officer with the Counter Terrorism Division of Malaysian Special Branch said yesterday the arrests had heightened suspicion that the flight's disappearance may have been an act of terrorism.

'The possibility that the plane was diverted by militants is still high on the list and international investigators have asked for a comprehensive report on this new terror group,' the officer said.

In interviews conducted so far, some suspects have admitted planning 'sustained terror campaigns' in Malaysia but denied being involved in the disappearance of the airliner, he added.

A mystery surrounding the cargo being carried by the missing Malaysian Airlines plane emerged on Friday when it was discovered that it had been loaded with items not specified on the manifest.

The aircraft was carrying 4.566 tonnes of mangosteens – an exotic fruit – and a shipment of lithium batteries, which were part of a separate consignment.

The batteries weighed 200kg, but that separate consignment totalled 2.453 tonnes. So what was being carried to make up the 2.253 tonnes in that separate shipment?

Questions have been raised as Malaysia Airlines said it will close assistance centres in Beijing and Kuala Lumpur for the families of the 239 passengers and crew on board the Boeing 777-200ER jet.

The closures come after rescuers abandoned their fruitless air search for the missing jet, which had focused on a remote area of the Indian Ocean off Australia's west coast.

The mystery was sparked by a spokesman for the company that shipped the batteries telling a Malaysian newspaper that he would not reveal what the remaining 2.253 tonnes of cargo were.

'I cannot reveal more because of the ongoing investigations,' the spokesman told The Star newspaper. 'We have been told by our legal advisers not to talk about it.'

The spokesman said he could not even name the company which manufactured the batteries, insisting that the matter was confidential.

Questioned about the fact that a mystery cargo was not stated in the manifest, Malaysian Airlines told the paper that the rest of the consignment was 'radio accessories and chargers.'

A statement from the airline said that the freight not specified had been 'declared as radio accessories', despite there being no reference to this in the manifest released publicly last Thursday.

What the manifest does say is that NNR Global shipped 133 pieces of one item weighing 1.99 tonnes and 67 pieces of another item weighing 463kg for a total 'consolidated weight' of 2.453 tonnes.

Just how many lithium batteries had been loaded, or their weight, are not specified in the manifest, although Malaysian Airlines boss Ahmad Yahya told a media conference in Kuala Lumpur on March 24 that the batteries weighed a total of 200kg.

What the manifest does say, in respect of the lithium batteries, is that 'the package must be handled with care and that a flammability hazard exists if the package is damaged.

'Special procedures must be followed in the event the package is damaged, to include inspection and repacking if necessary.'

There has been earlier speculation that a fire involving the batteries might have been the cause of the aircraft's fate.

According to The Star, shippers NNR Global are located at an air freight forwarding warehouse located less than 100 yards from the Penang International Airport.

'The complex is guarded by the police and only those with passes are allowed entry,' the newspaper said, following its investigation into the unspecified cargo.

A consolidated shipment combines several individual consignments to make up a full container load.

At the port of destination, the consolidated shipment is separated back into individual consignments for delivery to their respective consignees.

The lithium batteries and the other mystery items that are said to be radio parts were addressed to NNR Global Logistics in Beijing, but a company named JHJ International Transportation Co.Ltd of Beijing was to collect the cargo on its behalf.


Government Lays Groundwork To Confiscate Your 401k and IRA: “This Is Happening”

Government Lays Groundwork To Confiscate Your 401k and IRA: “This Is Happening”

Thursday morning Reuters obtained a leaked proposal disclosing that European Union officials are looking for new and innovative ways to fund their immense debt levels. As noted by Zero Hedge, they’re no longer turning exclusively to central bankers to simply print more money as needed. Because last year’s bank bail-in forcing the confiscation of funds from average depositors in Cyprus worked so well, EU regulators and bankers have determined that they’ll use a similar method to fund their future endeavors.
In a nutshell, and in Reuters’ own words, “the savings of the European Union’s 500 million citizens could be used to fund long-term investments to boost the economy and help plug the gap left by banks since the financial crisisan EU document says.”

The solution? “The Commission will ask the bloc’s insurance watchdog in the second half of this year for advice on a possible draft law “to mobilize more personal pension savings for long-term financing”, the document said.”
Mobilize, once again, is a more palatable word than, say, confiscate.
This is what happens when governments run out of money.
But if you think this is limited to just Europe, then consider the words of President Barack Obama in his recent State of the Union address.
For all intents and purposes, a similar groundwork is being laid right here in America.
They’ve already taken over the health care industry… why not nationalize our retirement savings while they’re at it?
(Reprinted with permission from Sovereign Man. You can read the full analysis here.)
This is basically the offer that the President of the United States floated last night.
And like an unctuously overgeled used car salesman, he actually pitched Americans on loaning their retirement savings to the US government with a straight face, guaranteeing “a decent return with no risk of losing what you put in. . .”
This is his new “MyRA” program. And the aim is simple– dupe unwitting Americans to plow their retirement savings into the US government’s shrinking coffers.
We’ve been talking about this for years. I have personally written since 2009 that the US government would one day push US citizens into the ‘safety and security’ of US Treasuries.
Back in 2009, almost everyone else thought I was nuts for even suggesting something so sacrilegious about the US government and financial system.
But the day has arrived. And POTUS stated almost VERBATIM what I have been writing for years.
The government is flat broke. Even by their own assessment, the US government’s “net worth” is NEGATIVE 16 trillion. That’s as of the end of 2012 (the 2013 numbers aren’t out yet). But the trend is actually worsening.
In 2009, the government’s net worth was negative $11.45 trillion. By 2010, it had dropped to minus $13.47 trillion. By 2011, minus $14.78 trillion. And by 2012, minus $16.1 trillion.
Here’s the thing: according to the IRS, there is well over $5 trillion in US individual retirement accounts. For a government as bankrupt as Uncle Sam is, $5 trillion is irresistible.
They need that money. They need YOUR money. And this MyRA program is the critical first step to corralling your hard earned retirement funds.
At our event here in Chile last year, Jim Rogers nailed this right on the head when he and Ron Paul told our audience that the government would try to take your retirement funds:
I don’t know how much more clear I can be: this is happening. This is exactly what bankrupt governments do. And it’s time to give serious, serious consideration to shipping your retirement funds overseas before they take yours.
As former Congressman Ron Paul notes, the government will stop at nothing.
“They’ll use force and they’ll use intimidation and they’ll use guns, because you can’t challenge the State and you can’t challenge the State’s so-called right to control the money,” warns Paul. “It’s already indicated that they will confiscate funds and they will [confiscate] pension funds.”
This didn’t just happen over night. The move to make this reality has been going on for quite some time. The first time it was mentioned publicly in any official capacity was at a 2010 Congressional hearing:
Democrats in the Senate on Thursday held a recess hearing covering a taxpayer bailout of union pensions and a plan to seize private 401(k) plans to more “fairly” distribute taxpayer-funded pensions to everyone.
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee heard from hand-picked witnesses advocating the infamous “Guaranteed Retirement Account” (GRA) authored by Theresa Guilarducci.
In a nutshell, under the GRA system government would seize private 401(k) accounts, setting up an additional 5% mandatory payroll tax to dole out a “fair” pension to everyone using that confiscated money coupled with the mandated contributions.  This would, of course, be a sister government ponzi scheme working in tandem with Social Security, the primary purpose being to give big government politicians additional taxpayer funds to raid to pay for their out-of-control spending.
You’d think that such an idea would be immediately dismissed by the American public, but it has only gained steam since, as evidenced by a 2012 hearing held at the U.S. Labor Department:
The hearing, held in the Labor Department’s main auditorium, was monitored by NSC staff and featured a line up of left-wing activists including one representative of the AFL-CIO who advocated for more government regulation over private retirement accounts and even the establishment of government-sponsored annuities that would take the place of 401k plans.
“This hearing was set up to explore why Americans are not saving as much for their retirement as they could,” explains National Seniors Council National Director Robert Crone, “However, it is clear that this is the first step towards a government takeover. It feels just like the beginning of the debate over health care and we all know how that ended up.
Such “reforms” would effectively end private retirement accounts in America, Crone warns.
A few years ago the government of the United States of America nationalized nearly 1/6th of our economy when they took over the health care system with forced mandates. In the process they essentially took control of $1.6 trillion in yearly industry revenues.
But that’s nothing compared to private savings. The total amount of retirement assets in America, including 401k, IRA and savings accounts is around $21 trillion. With our national debt coincidentally approaching the same, the government sees big money and potentially a way out of our country’s fiscal disaster.
This will start voluntarily with the MyRA and other state-sponsored programs. But when not enough Americans are making it their patriotic duty to turn over their funds to their government, they’ll mandate compliance with the stroke of a pen just as they did with the Patient Affordable Care Act.
And just like Obamacare it will be enforced by the barrel of a gun. Failure to comply will mean confiscation without recourse and prison time.
All they need now is a trigger.
And that trigger will likely come in the form of another stock market collapse. Wipe out Americans’ in a stock market crash and scare the heck out of them with more economic bad news, and millions of our countrymen will be all too willing to hand it over to Uncle Sam. Panic is a powerful motivator and what better way to get people on board than by threatening them with squalor and destitution in their old age if they don’t go along with it?
Government officials have been actively working to make this a reality for years. The Europeans are doing the same.
You can put your head in the sand or cover your ears and pretend this is not happening, but that won’t change the outcome.
They will take everything they can get their hands on.
Mac Slavo is the Editor of

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

Time to Decide Federal Employees: Are You a Traitor or a Patriot?

Time to Decide Federal Employees: Are You a Traitor or a Patriot?

Americans live in a time of unprecedented tyranny through the enactment of unconstitutional legislation like the Patriot Act and the sham courts we call FISA. The entire Constitution was set on its ear by the passage if the NDAA which allows for the kidnapping of American citizens by the Federal government without following the due process of law.
Of course, we have also witnessed  a 100 mile wide Constitution-free zone instituted by DHS that runs along the entire border of the US. Investigative reporters Andrew Breitbart and Michael Hastings were murdered for what they presumably learned and were about to reveal. And, of course Ed Snowden is literally running for his life for revealing the criminal domestic spying activities of the NSA. As if these abuses were not enough, there is a relatively new federal spying program which has pretty much flown beneath the radar and this program poses a direct threat to every single federal employee and if you are a Federal employee, dust off your resume and preserve your humanity. 

The Federal Government Is Not Your Friend

The NSA, CIA, FBI, IRS and the DHS are not your friend. They are not combating foreign terrorists. Their mission is not to protect you from Al Qaeda. Their undeniable mission is to protect the global elite from you and your anticipated failure to submit to the tyranny being rolled out across the country in the form of an administratively imposed martial law.  I am not going to mince words, the morphed missions of these Federal agencies constitute being labeled as an enemy of the state, the legitimate state, not the state that has been hijacked by foreign bankers on behalf of the globalists. 
As American citizens, we are duty bound to defend the country from enemies both foreign and domestic. I just identified two of our main enemies. The bankers and their political minions constitute a national security threat against the Republic and its guiding government document, The United States Constitution. The bankers and the policies of the politicians pose a threat to every single Federal employee.

Attention Federal Employees

Attention Federal employees, did you accept federal employment so you could willingly participate in illegal actions against the American people, the very people you have sworn an oath to serve, protect and defend?
Attention Federal employees, would you be complicit in your silence as your supervisors engage in illegal and unconstitutional behavior with their intended target frequently consisting of the American people?
Attention Federal employees, would you willingly work in an East German Stasi type of organization which metaphorically eats its young?
Attention Federal employees, after reading this article, if you work one more day for the government, you are complicit in participating in the implementation of a police state which rivals the evil of any rogue regime which has ever existed.
Attention federal employees, if there are ever Nuremburg type trials for war criminals in response to the heinous crimes that the present globalists have committed and will commit, you could find yourself on trial as an accomplice for crimes against humanity. The “I was just following orders” excuse will not fly should humanity rise up and subdue the servants of the banksters. This lame excuse did not work for the Nazis, and it will not work for you.
If you are a federal employee, you need to find another job. Stand down and stop spying on the American public. Stop pretending that your bosses don’t endorse the MIAC report, the sell off of sovereign US land to the Chinese, the illegal incarceration of Americans under the NDAA and the treasonous money policies of the unconstitutional Federal Reserve. Don’t tell me that times are tough. Don’t tell me that you have a family to feed. For when you are eventually sentenced as an accomplice to crimes against humanity, how well will you be supporting your family from the deep, dark cell that you will inhabit?
For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul?
Mathew 16:26

Federal Employees Are Now Members of the Amerikan Stasi

It takes a special type of person to work for any country’s secret police. In short, it takes a power hungry person who enjoys controlling and humiliating others. Throughout history, members of the various secret police agencies are sociopathic, and have a long and serious criminal history.
The East German Stasi were known for assigning voyeurs to each apartment building in which they would drill tiny holes were drilled in apartment and hotel room walls from which these Stasi misfits would film their neighbors with cameras, many times while they were having sex. The derived information was frequently used to humiliate, blackmail and discredit potential political opponents. I can remember the day we used to scoff at such behavior.  Now I am witnessing the day when our Federal government are all members of the new Amerikan Stasi.
No doubt that some federal employees are openly critical of the actions of the NSA, but distance themselves from their behaviors by stating that they don’t work for any agency which illegally spies upon the American people. 
When the rationalizations breakdown, all Federal employees need to realize that they are de facto employees of the police state surveillance grid.
Attention Federal employees you are now required to be a member of the police state surveillance grid, like it or not, because your participation has been codified into law.

Operation Insider Threat

They call the program “Insider Threat” because anyone who dares to tell the truth about the massive abuses of power is a threat to globalist insiders and their plans to enslave humanity.
Government documents have revealed that the Obama administration is implementing a program that requires, under penalty of law, that millions of federal employees to spy on their co-workers as part of a massive crackdown on security leaks across the U.S. government.
The program is titled “Insider Threat” which has gone almost entirely unnoticed in the mainstream media also presses federal managers to punish employees who fail to report their suspicions. Federal employees are required to not only report violations of co-workers, they are required to report any “suspicions” of their co-workers in a freaky pre-crime scenario 
The pre-crime nature of the program includes all federal agencies and mandates employees and their superiors to identify and report behaviors associated with someone who MIGHT leak sensitive government information.
Those who fail to expose “high-risk persons” face penalties that include criminal charges, according to a leaked federal government report. Federal employees should keep in mind that the failure to report could indeed be dangerous to their health in this era of the NDAA and authorized drone strikes against the American people without due process of law.
The program was covertly launched in October 2011 in response to Bradley Manning’s blowing  the whistle on U.S. war crimes, in the largest intelligence leak in U.S. history. 
According to the federal government memo entitled, Pentagon strategy, which was written for the Insider Threat Program, leaking sensitive documents is “tantamount to aiding the enemies of the United States.”
The government documents reviewed by McClatchy reveal that some federal agencies are using “previously unknown strategies” to crack down on leaks of any information, not just classified documents.

It is now  a crime to report a crime being committed by the Federal government.

As McClatchy reports, that in light of the Snowden debacle, the Obama administration is expected to enhance and quicken the pace of the implementation and subsequent enforcement of the program.
President Barack Obama has defended the U.S. government’s spying programs as transparent and legal, even though the NSA was authorized to run the surveillance activities in secret. President Oxymoron does indeed play fast and loose with the truth.

This Warning Is for Every Federal Employee

This warning is for every federal employee whether you deliver mail, are in the military, work at the Pentagon, the NSA, the CIA, the FBI or just work as a custodian at a Federal building. 
If you continue to work for the federal government, you, in effect, will be aiding and abetting the beginning of widespread persecutions of your fellow federal employees which will ultimately result in several of your colleague being wrongly imprisoned, tortured and even murdered. Some might question the possibility of murder. Tell that to Ed Snowden.
I know some of you work for the Federal government because of the great pension benefits. In case you did not get the word, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew has begun to raid your retirement funds to offset the failure of the government to raise the debt ceiling.
Make no mistake about it Mr./Ms Federal employee, all you have to do is to anger the wrong Federal employee and you could find yourself on the wrong end of a waterboard based on trumped up charges invented by a jealous colleague.
Dave Hodges is the Editor and Host of The Common Sense Show.

Exclusive Interview With Extortion 17 SEAL’s Father - The Scandal That Led To The "Worst Loss Of Life In The Afghan War"

Exclusive Interview With Extortion 17 SEAL’s Father - The Scandal That Led To The "Worst Loss Of Life In The Afghan War"

Before there was Benghazi, there was Extortion 17, which was the Chinook helicopter that was shot down by the Taliban. All 38 people aboard, including 17 Navy SEALs and seven Afghan National Army commandos, were killed. Among the dead was Navy SEAL Aaron Vaughn. Tomorrow, August 6 will mark the two year anniversary of Extortion 17 being shot down. In an exclusive interview with Freedom Outpost, Aaron's father, Billy Vaughn told us what he knows and about his new book due out this month, Betrayed: Exposing the High Cost of the War on Terror, and the corruption and incompetence behind what took place that led to his son's and others deaths.
Mr. Vaughn told me that he and his wife have dropped out of the lawsuit that we reported on back in May when the story about the Muslim cleric in Afghanistan prayed and condemned six Navy SEAL team members to Hell, saying that the lawsuit was "too broad" and was not in their best interests.
However, Vaughn did say that they were very much involved in the investigation that has been announced by Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) recently, following a visit that he and his wife took to Washington, D.C to meet with Chaffetz and Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) a little over a month and a half ago.
When asked about the objective of their involvement with Congress, Vaughn said that "it's going to be a pretty high goal, but Vice President Joe Biden committed a breach of national security when he outed the SEALS. We want to see him held accountable and if need be, we want to see him punished."
 extortion 17
30 brave Americans killed on August 6, 2011 aboard Extortion 17
Vaughn also said that in addition to Biden being held accountable, he wants to see former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta held accountable for his national security breach, when he outed the Navy SEALS back on June 24, 2011.
"And then," he continued, "we have a lot of questions that need answers." Among those questions they want answers to is the identity of the seven Afghans who were onboard. Vaughn said that the names on the manifest were not the names of those who were actually aboard.
Mr. Vaughn said that it would be necessary information to know why these Afghans were swapped. In his conversations with others in the military and on the investigative team, they had not been made aware of the changes.
 extortion 17
Petty Officer 1st Class SEAL Aaron Vaughn was killed August 6, 2011 on board Extortion 17
The Vaughns also want to know why the rules of engagement continue to keep America's troops from engaging like they did the night his son's helicopter was shot down. "When the chopper went in…. a declared 'hot area'…three and a half hour firefight had already been going on" Vaughn said. "No pre-assault fire was laid down by the air weapons team in the air because of the rules of engagement. Their quote, their testimony was 'It's almost impossible to get cleared for pre-assault fire.'"
"So this chopper went into that 'hot zone' just like it was landing at a Wal-Mart parking lot," Vaughn added.
Mr. Vaughn then told me the chilling words that we don't even want to think about when he said, "We suspect that the mission was compromised."
What evidence is to that effect? According to Vaughn, there is written testimony that says that the "Afghans were moving toward the landing area, the insertion area, for the SEALs, before the SEALs ever got there." This indicates they were aware of what was going on and also indicates that Extortion 17 did not have a secretive approach.
Vaughn said that his son's team as well as others have to work with a group called the OCG (Operational Coordination Group), which is made up of Afghanis, who are involved in all the intelligence that the Special Ops do and are involved in the planning and even carrying out of missions. The frightening thing about working with the OCG is that Vaughn says "they are not properly vetted."
The military has confirmed that Pakistanis have infiltrated the OCG, which obviously result in compromised and deadly situation for America's soldiers to be operating under. I'll add that it also reflects on the commander-in-chief to be using foreigners in assisting our Special Ops forces, which gives them information on how we operate and also makes them vulnerable to lethal attacks.
"This OCG group actually has the authority to squash a mission that our military needs to have performed, if they want to," Vaughn said. "So in theory, we've placed our men under the authority of the government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. It's treacherous and it's treasonous for our government and this administration to allow this to go on."
Vaughn went on to elaborate on the particular mission the night that Extortion 17 was shot down. "The night that Aaron was killed, those men were flying with general purposes aviation. Both, general purposes and special operations, I believe, are equally important to our national security, but they have different duties and at that time they were being placed together, to fight together, for the first time in the Afghan theater."
There was no training outside the theater before they got there and all at once they were brought into the battle together and it ends with both groups, general purpose group and special operations, getting killed.
Plaque remembering the fallen of Extortion 17
Plaque remembering the fallen of Extortion 17
Mr. Vaughn went on to say that the general purpose operations don't even use the same equipment as Special Forces. The do not use "assault-style" equipment and Vaughn said that the helicopter they were using was just one example of that. Vaughn communicated some personal thoughts about others he would like to see held accountable, but I agreed not to print those in the article, due to the steps that need to be taken to achieve the goals already set forward.
He did point out just how our military is being demoralized in Afghanistan. Citing Special Operations numbers in Afghanistan, Vaughn told Freedom Outpost that in 2009 we were conducting 56 special operations missions per month. By 2010, the number of special operations being conducted jumped to more than triple to 186 mission per month. From August 2010 until July 2011, a month before Extortion 17 was shot down, the average of Special Forces missions being conducted in Afghanistan skyrocketed to an average of 335 mission!
"While the number of Special Operations strike forces were increased to accommodate those missions," Vaughn said, indicating that his information was obtained from the military, "the number of Special Operations aviation was not and is not being increased because it is not available."
As a result, Vaughn says "We have forced our special operators and our general purpose aviation into very compromising situations by placing them together and having to do these missions together. It limits the special operators in what they are able to do and what they have been trained to do and endangers their live. Obviously, it endangers the lives of the general purpose forces, who were never trained to fly special operations missions."
The Vaughns long-range goal is not only to find out exactly what occurred around their son's death, but also to get what Vaughn calls "ridiculous, if not criminal" rules of engagement changed to be more in favor of our warriors and less in favor of the enemy that they are trying to neutralize.
Billy Vaughn and his wife Karen began finding out disturbing information about the crash and what was going on by October 2011. By the end of that month they were already reaching out to Congressmen to help get to the bottom of what happened with Extortion 17. At that time, most of the Congressmen didn't respond to him. However, he did tell me that he received a response from former congressmen Allen West, Tom Rooney (R-FL) and Stephen Fincher (R-TN). Since that time, they have had communications with various congressmen.
Vaughn eventually spoke with retired Army Major General Paul Vallely about what he was uncovering and they teamed together to produce a book that will be out this month titled Betrayed: Exposing the High Cost of the War on Terror with a foreword written by Lt. General Jerry Boykin. If you would like to order the book, go to
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.
You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

Extortion 17 is a Bigger Scandal and Betrayal than Benghazi

Extortion 17 is a Bigger Scandal and Betrayal than Benghazi

Extortion 17 could be a bigger scandal and betrayal of Americans than Benghazi. While Benghazi resulted in four American deaths, Extortion 17 resulted in 38 deaths, including nearly two dozen Navy SEALs. Many of these SEALs were made famous, credited with the killing of Osama bin Laden. The Chinook helicopter they were aboard was shot down by Taliban forces, which written testimony confirms knew the elite forces were coming into the area. Families are going after the Obama administration for what they believe were leaks that led to their family members' deaths. According to Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee on National Security, "We're going to dive into this."
Billy Vaughn, father of slain Navy SEAL Aaron Vaughn, recently told Freedom Outpost that the family wants to see Vice President Joe Biden and former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta held accountable for national security breaches when they outed the SEALs.
Not only were the SEAL team members furious and shocked over the big mouths of the Obama administration beating its chest with pride over the success of killing bin Laden, but the families were equally enraged. The message compromised the safety of the unit, as well as their families.
At a gathering at the Ritz Carlton hotel in Washington, D.C. for the 50th anniversary of the Atlantic Council, a mere two days after the raid, Vice President Joe Biden remarked to the audience,
"Let me briefly acknowledge tonight's distinguished honorees: Adm. Jim Stavridis is the real deal; he could tell you more about and understands the incredible, the phenomenal, the just almost unbelievable capacity of his Navy SEALS and what they did last — last Sunday."
"And what was even more extraordinary was — and I'm sure former administration officials will appreciate this more than anyone — there was such an absolute, overwhelming desire to accomplish this mission that although for over several months, we were in the process of planning it, and there were as many as 16 members of Congress who were briefed on it, not a single, solitary thing leaked. I find that absolutely amazing," Biden added.
Forget Edward Snowden. Joe Biden made one of the biggest leaks of national security information in recent history!
Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta made leaked similar information while in Afghanistan.
Karen Vaughn, joined by her husband Billy, on Fox News said, As soon as Joe Biden announced that it was a SEAL Team who took out Bin Laden, within 24 hours, my son called me and I rarely ever heard him sound afraid in his adult life…. He said, 'Mom, you need to wipe your social media clean…your life is in danger, our lives are in danger, so clean it up right now'."
Mr. Vaughn, showing his anger and disgust with Biden, ripped the media. "The media has let this man get away with saying 'Uncle Joe's gaffes, Uncle Joe's gaffes," he said. "This is not Uncle Joe and he's not some senile old grandfather. He is the second in command of the most powerful country in the world and he needs to take responsibility for the comments he makes and quit being given a pass."
Additionally, Charles Strange, father of fallen Navy SEAL Michael Strange, has been just as outspoken as the Vaughns against both Barack Obama and Joe Biden. In July, Strange told WND "Obama sent my son to his death."
Strange also recounted his interview with talk show host Michael Savage:
After the revelations of Joe Biden that SEAL Team 6 carried out the operation that has alleged to have killed Osama bin Laden, Strange said that members of the SEAL team echoed to their families similar concerns to that of Aaron Vaughn.
Strange told Savage that on at least three separate occasions, in June 2011, his son grabbed him by the arm and announced that he had prepared his will.
Charles Strange recalled his son's words, "Something's going on with the team. Somebody's leaking things out. Something's going on."
Savage asked: "Your son knew he was being sent to his death?"
"They knew," Strange answered. "They knew something was up. Every one of them."
What's even more disturbing is that the military claimed that the bodies were so badly burned that they had to be cremated, and they were cremated without the families' consent.
Strange believes the military is lying.
"I saw Mike's dead body," he said in an interview. "It was clearly recognizable. He was clutching his gun. He wasn't burned to a crisp. Why did they cremate my boy? They didn't need to do that. Something's not right."
Rep. Chaffetz, who said he saw a photo of a deceased SEAL, believes the same thing. "The body I saw didn't need to be cremated," he said.    
To add insult to injury, a Muslim cleric was allowed to pray at the funeral of the fallen SEALs in 2011, reciting words to the effect, "That the fallen seals should be damned and go to hell as infidels."
Yet, America is told to be sensitive about burning the real infidels' Qur'an, while it's perfectly OK for our military to burn Bibles.
Perhaps, instead of the administration worrying about Edward Snowden's revelations of its own violations of the Constitution, it should be a little more concerned with the real national security violations of men like Biden and Panetta, or maybe the American people should be concerned with the biggest national security threat to the United States, Barack Hussein Obama.
Learn more about Extortion 17 and what is being uncovered in Billy Vaughn's book Betrayed: Exposing the High Cost of the War on Terror.
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.
You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.