Sunday, February 17, 2013

[ HELLO ANONYMOUS ] TIME TO TAKE DOWN OBAMA

Dr. Taitz, Esq. has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress

Posted on | February 17, 2013 | No Comments


Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com

02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681

PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO CUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF HE CASE, EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5 justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin.  She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2 Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
    Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S. President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination  due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud, on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records, sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts showing that Barack Obama is:
  1. A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency.
  2.  Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance, it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
  3. Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine 1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY. In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S. government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.

  1. 4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia, immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18 month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of California for reconsideration.
 315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY: IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304, where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.    
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases, they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs, U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason, who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Exhibit 1



Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Share

Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress

Dr. Taitz, Esq. has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress

Posted on | February 17, 2013 | No Comments


Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com

02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681

PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO CUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF HE CASE, EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5 justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin.  She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2 Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
    Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S. President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination  due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud, on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records, sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts showing that Barack Obama is:
  1. A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency.
  2.  Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance, it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
  3. Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine 1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY. In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S. government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.

  1. 4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia, immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18 month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of California for reconsideration.
 315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY: IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304, where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.    
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases, they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs, U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason, who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Exhibit 1



Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Share

Obama maintains his support by artificially keeping people in poverty, opposition has to push in the direction of giving incentives to get out of poverty

Obama maintains his support by artificially keeping people in poverty, opposition has to push in the direction of giving incentives to get out of poverty

Posted on | February 17, 2013 | 9 Comments
Aside from badly rigged and manipulated elections another reason for Obama’s recent win is in artificially keeping people in poverty and hence keeping them as his constituency. While most of the middle class is the GOP Constituency, the most poor and the most rich are the stronghold of the Obama support.
Today, while GOP still has the House, it’s main goal should be incentivising the move from poverty to middle class. In my opinion two main lines of attack should be reversing 2 failing social programs that currently incentivize people to:
a. sit on welfare
b. have children out of wedlock
When you look at Obama’s constituency an unproportionally high percentage of his supporters are people sitting on welfare and single women who get governmental aid. What Democratic party is doing to these two groups of people is shameful and despicable. It is similar to what the Arabic countries are doing to Palestinians. Arabic countries are artificially keeping a certain percentage of Palestinians poor, not integrated in societies in Gaza, in Jordan, in Lebanon, as they represent a bargaining chip.
Similarly the Democratic party is keeping people on welfare, as the bargaining chip, as the core of their loyal constituency.
What has to be done?
GOP in the House of Representatives has to pull the strings of the purse and  demand replacement of welfare with workfare as a condition for fiscal allocations beyond what is received in revenues byt the U.S. government.
 Obama is bankrupting the nation with an enormous debt. There has to be a provision in that only people who are completely disabled and are in the hospital bed ridden should be getting welfare without having to work. Everybody else has to work in order to get assistance from the government.
We have 2.65 million federal employees, who are getting salaries and benefits which are twice the rate in the free market. This has to end immediately. Government jobs are non-productive jobs. Each individual working for the government is supported by taxes of 10 people in the private sector. As we as a nation are bankrupt this has to end. 90 percent of the Federal Government jobs can be transferred to Workfare jobs and the remaining 10 percent should not exceed the rate of salary and benefits of a comparable job in the private sector. If you really want to incentivize the private sector, you have to set the scale of government jobs slightly lower than the average salary of a comparable worker in the area, it should be at least 5-10% lower than the private sector job.
Today we have 12.3 million unemployed (keep in mind, these are people who are receiving unemployment and are still counted, real numbers are much higher) and we have 23 million total of unemployed and underemployed.
On the other hand we have 2.65 million working for the Federal government.
 How many are working for the state and local governments? In CA there are 2.4 million state employees, whch is double the number of manufacturing jobs in CA. I took the number of state employees in CA, and multiplied it by 12%, which is the percentage CA makes of the total population in the US and came up with 20 million state and local employees in the US. Well, CA is a crazy deep blue state. Let’s see what is the average in the U.S. according to the latest statistics? There are 61 state and local employees for every 1,000 population. Taking into account current population of 315 million in the U.S. we have about 19.2 million of state and local employees nationwide. If you add rouphly 2.65 million working for the Federal government, we have 22 million employed by Federal, state and local governments around the country and roughly the same number of people who are unemployed or underemployed, who are getting wellfare benefits for 2 years. If the government were to allocate those governemntal jobs to workfare, it could drastically lower the expenses and deficit and would give people incentive to work and to move to the private sector productive jobs.
Also, being employed by the government would look much better on the resume than being on welfare for 2 years. It will also help people maintain their work ethics, professional education and skills and keep up the psychological and emotional well being.
Moving people from wellfare to workfare benefits the country as a whole.
Similarly I an appalled and disgusted by the latest glorification of men, who father multiple children by multiple women and are economically pimping by living off the taxpayers paying the welfare    to all these children and all these women. There are TV programs which glorify such lifestyle.This has to end. Being irresponsible and having children out of wedlock and living off others who are responsible and pay for their children and for the children of dead beats is immoral and it destroys the economic an moral fiber of the society.
I can understand an older woman in her 40s, who has education, professional training and who is secure financially deciding to have a child out of wedlock or adopt. I understand this. I am not Ann Coulter, I am not a heartless childless demagogue like her, I understand older women, who decide to have a child after they did not find  a right person to marry until age 40 or so. Typically these women are not sitting on welfare.
At issue is a large group of single women with children, mostly in the inner cities who are young, who are teenages, in their 20s and early 30s. Having them and fathers of their children in some type of workfare program in order to brake the cycle of welfare and poverty is a must.
I hope our congressmen make those changes to workfare in order to make a real difference. Today Carl Rove and the GOP elite are banking on Rubio and on him pushing for another amnesty. I am concerned that the end result of such amnesty will be a disaster for both GOP and the nation as a whole.
Yes, some of the Hispanics voting for Obama today will vote for a fellow Hispanic Rubio, however you can’t bank on this. First, DNC might push for a vice presidential candidate who is a Hispanic, so it will be a wash. Additionally, the real numbers of illegals in this country are estimated by members of the immigration community to be 42 million, not 11 million. Even if you believe that it is 11 million, vast majority of them are poor and will go on multiple welfare programs the moment they get the citizenship. As the Democratic party is pushing for these programs, they will vote for the democrats, even if GOP is running Rubio.
If you want this country to go back to surplus, self sufficiency, you have to do what makes economic sence:
1. move from welfare to workfare
2. deport illegal immigrants and enforce the immigration laws and border security. We do not need any immigration reforms, we do not need new laws, we need to enforce existing laws
3. we have to either rescind WTO-GATT or renegotiate it. You cannot have free trade with slave labor countries, with countries like China or India, where there is 1.3-1.2 billion people willing to work for less than a $1 per hour. Our corrupt congressmen who continue going along with NAFTA and WTO-GATT are simply annihilating the U.S. economy and the U.S. manufacturing
4. and lastly, of course, you have to remove the foreign national with all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number. I wrote about it at length here.  

ress Release: Kathleen O’Leary, Presiding Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal reinstated the Appeal Taitz v Obama et al filed by the candidate for the U.S. Senate Attorney Orly Taitz

ress Release: Kathleen O’Leary, Presiding Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal reinstated the Appeal Taitz v Obama et al filed by the candidate for the U.S. Senate Attorney Orly Taitz

Posted on | February 5, 2013 | 23 Comments

Press Release
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Kathleen O’Leary, Presiding Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal reinstated the Appeal Taitz v Obama et al filed by the candidate for the U.S. Senate Attorney Orly Taitz
Appeal at hand involves Senator Diane Feinstein and Barack Obama as a candidate for the U.S. Presidency.
The case at hand was filed in July 2012. It involves evidence of one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California. Additionally appeal involves lack of legitimacy of Barack Obama to the U.S. Presidency due to his of forged IDs, stolen CT Social Security number, last name not legally his and fraudulent claim to be the U.S. citizen. Evidence in the case involves a certified copy of the passport records of Obama’s mother, S. Ann Dunham, which shows her son’s legal last name to be Soebarkah, not Obama, it involves Obama’sschool records from Indonesia showing his citizenship to be Indonesian, sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts and investigators showing Obama’s birth certificate and  Selective service certificate to be forged and Social Security number used by Barack Obama in his 2009 tax returns and posted on WhiteHouse.gov to be fraudulently used and failing both E-Verify and SSNVS

Quran proves Allah is Satan the DECEIVER in Islam. Allah deceives people to do evil

Quran proves Allah is Satan the DECEIVER in Islam. Allah deceives people...: http://youtu.be/5kAFYai1law via @youtube

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV0bmSc3xkg


Quran proves Allah is Satan the DECEIVER in Islam. Allah deceives people to do evil 

 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKt8xSEWnkE

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rer6BnSrInc

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GD4hEk3VYo

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqKJhETKYEU

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL0gFIXnhiE

 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k14uUgywLsM

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEcz2hprZqs

 

 Proof JESUS is GOD From the Quran(part1): http://youtu.be/1H02o1OIiDQ via @youtube

 

 

 

 

Bulgaria to reveal how it traced Hezbollah to deadly attack on Israeli tourists in Burgas

Bulgaria to reveal how it traced Hezbollah to deadly attack on Israeli tourists in Burgas

Bulgarian FM to seek EU sanctions against Hezbollah based on a computer printer in Beirut, DNA traces on a used SIM card and several suspicious telephone calls, and other pieces of evidence.

By | Feb.18, 2013 | 12:48 AM


Smoke is seen after a terrorist blast at Bulgaria's Burgas airport July 18, 2012.
Smoke rising after a terrorist blast at Bulgaria's Burgas airport July 18, 2012. Photo by Reuters


A computer printer in Beirut, DNA traces on a used SIM card and several suspicious telephone calls are just some of the clues that led Bulgarian intelligence agents to conclude that Hezbollah was behind last July’s bombing attack in Burgas, which killed five Israeli tourists and a Bulgarian bus driver.
Bulgarian Foreign Minister Nickolay Mladenov will be presenting these and many other pieces of evidence on Tuesday during a luncheon at the monthly conference of the EU Foreign Ministers Council in Brussels. Mladenov’s aim is to persuade his 26 colleagues that a terror attack in Burgas is no different than one in Paris, London, Rome or Berlin.
This will be no easy task. The atmosphere at Monday’s luncheon is expected to be tense. Even though over a dozen EU states issued statements supporting the investigation report Bulgaria issued nearly two weeks ago, the EU has no appetite right now for starting up with Hezbollah.
Since the report was issued, the United States, Britain, Holland and Israel have been making diplomatic efforts to get the EU to impose sanctions on Hezbollah. Britain and Holland are the only to EU nations to have declared Hezbollah a terror organization.
But the assessment in Jerusalem is that it will be a long time before there will be European action against Hezbollah, if only because this would require the agreement of all 27 EU states. Both France and Italy are known to oppose sanctions for fear they would send Lebanon into a serious tailspin that could become violent, while Germany has also been cautious.
At best, say Israeli Foreign Ministry officials, France might agree to put a few senior Hezbollah officials on its terror list, but not the whole group.
“We’re realistic; if we get that we’ll consider it an achievement,” said a senior Foreign Ministry official.
Over the past three weeks, details about the identities of the three terrorists have been leaking to the Bulgarian, Canadian and Australian press, as well as about how they got to Bulgaria.
The three were Lebanese natives who held foreign passports − two Canadian and one Australian − and forged driver’s licenses from Canada and the United States. The true identity of the terrorist who was killed is still not known, though it is assumed he was a Canadian citizen. In the investigative report he is identified as Jack Philip Martin, the name on his forged Canadian driver’s license.
DNA samples of his were sent to several Western intelligence agencies but none of them could find a match to anyone in their records. The only clue that connected him to the terrorists who survived and fled was a SIM card and a forged Canadian driver’s license that were found in a small town on the Bulgarian-Romanian border. The items, which belonged to a cell member who got away, had DNA traces that were very similar to the DNA of the suicide terrorist. The forged driver’s licenses that all three of them carried yielded the most significant smoking gun, since with the help of foreign intelligence sources the Bulgarians managed to locate the printer that had produced the forged documents − and it wasn’t in Canada or in the United States, but in Lebanon.
The cell members went from Beirut to Istanbul and then flew to Warsaw. From there they took trains to Prague, Romania and then Burgas. The two surviving cell members fled back to Lebanon the same way.
The three spent about a month in Europe before the attack, most of it in Burgas, where they switched hotels every couple of days and were rarely seen together. The investigation found that there was an increase in the number of calls between Burgas and Lebanon in the days that preceded the attack, among them several suspicious calls that were apparently between the cell members and Hezbollah officials.
During their stay in Burgas, the cell monitored the movements of Israeli tourists. The original plan was to attack a hotel that catered primarily to Israelis, but in the end they decided to target a tour bus.
According to the Bulgarians, the plan was to plant the bomb on the bus and blow it up by remote control as it was making its way from the airport to the city. The cell member later picked out by the airport security cameras was waiting for a group of Israeli tourists so he could accompany them to their bus and plant his bag with the bomb on it.
This is where the plan went awry. Two of the Israelis confronted the terrorist as he was trying to shove his bag deep into the bus’ cargo hold. Since the three-kilogram bomb had been put together by the cell in a relatively amateurish fashion, the shaking of the bag apparently caused the bomb to explode prematurely, turning the terrorist into an unwitting suicide bomber.

Boys In Girls Restrooms Mandate: New Massachusetts ‘Education Policy’ Mandates Allowing Boys In Girls Restrooms & Vice Versa

Boys In Girls Restrooms Mandate: New Massachusetts ‘Education Policy’ Mandates Allowing Boys In Girls Restrooms & Vice Versa
Sunday, February 17, 2013 15:20
0
<a href="http://ox-d.beforeitsnews.com/w/1.0/rc?cs=50cea33e4473b&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE" ><img src="http://ox-d.beforeitsnews.com/w/1.0/ai?auid=326914&cs=50cea33e4473b&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE" border="0" alt=""></a>

This breaking story from the Christian News Network shares a bizarre new policy mandate coming out of the Massachusetts public school system that will allow boys to use girls restrooms and vice versa if the individual 'identifies' with the opposite gender. We can only imagine what new kinds of problems will soon develop from this new policy. From Christian News Network - Massachusetts Education Policy Mandates Allowing Boys in Girls’ Restrooms



Malden, Massachusetts – The Massachusetts Commissioner of Education has released an outline of its new school policy regarding gender equality, mandating that boys be allowed to use girls restrooms and locker rooms — and vice versa — if they contend that they prefer to identify with the opposite gender.

The 11-page document, written by Mitchell Chester, is stated to be in response to a gender identity law that was passed last July in the state.

“This guidance is intended to help school and district administrators take steps to create a culture in which transgender and gender nonconforming students feel safe, supported, and fully included, and to meet each school’s obligation to provide equal educational opportunities for all students, in compliance with G.L. c. 76, §5 and the state regulations,” it states.

As part of the outline, entitled Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity, Chester explains that students need to be permitted to use whichever bathroom or locker room they wish. He states that as long as the child asserts that they would rather identify with the  opposite gender, they should have the access that they desire.

 

us is about sharia law

OK LETS GET STARTED
OK MY THING IS
OK KILL THIS GIRL SHE IS NOT A VIRGIN I AM ISLAM I AM UNDER SHARIA LAW SO I DONT GO TO JAIL FOR KILLING FOR KILLING THE WHORE
OK NEXT THING IS THIS DUDE IS GAY
I GET TO KILL HIM TOO FOR HE IS GAY AND I AM ISLAM SO I DONT GO TO JAIL
ISNT THAT NICE
OK NEXT THING IS FOR I AM ISLAM I GET TO  KILL  PEOPLE WHO TALK ABOUT MY PROFIT
OK NEXT THING IS BECAUSE BECAUSE I AM ISLAM I GET TO FUCK 5 YEARS OLDS BECAUSE IT IS OUR LAW I CAN FUCK A 5 YEAR OLD KILL HER AND NOT GO TO JAIL
ISNT THAT AWESOME
WHAT A GREAT ISLAM NATION USA HAS BECOME
I CANT WAIT TO ALL THE WHORES ON WELFARE

Sharron Angle: Muslim Law Taking Hold In Parts Of U.S.


Sharron Angle: Muslim Law Taking Hold In Parts Of U.S.


Sharron Angle Muslim Law2
LAS VEGAS — U.S. Senate candidate Sharron Angle told a crowd of supporters that the country needs to address a "militant terrorist situation" that has allowed Islamic religious law to take hold in some American cities.
Her comments came at a rally of tea party supporters in the Nevada resort town of Mesquite last week after the candidate was asked about Muslims angling to take over the country, and marked the latest of several controversial remarks by the Nevada Republican.
In a recording of the rally provided to The Associated Press by the Mesquite Local News, a man is heard asking Angle : "I keep hearing about Muslims wanting to take over the United States ... on a TV program just last night, I saw that they are taking over a city in Michigan and the residents of the city, they want them out. They want them out. So, I want to hear your thoughts about that."
Angle responds that "we're talking about a militant terrorist situation, which I believe it isn't a widespread thing, but it is enough that we need to address, and we have been addressing it."
"My thoughts are these, first of all, Dearborn, Michigan, and Frankford, Texas are on American soil, and under constitutional law. Not Sharia law. And I don't know how that happened in the United States," she said. "It seems to me there is something fundamentally wrong with allowing a foreign system of law to even take hold in any municipality or government situation in our United States."
Dearborn, Mich., has a thriving Muslim community. It was not immediately clear why Angle singled out Frankford, Texas, a former town that was annexed into Dallas around 1975.
Responding to the same question, she also drew comparisons between the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and the Nazi Holocaust. She said the property owners behind the proposed Islamic community center near ground zero should move it in deference to the people who died there.
"There was, in Auschwitz, I think it was Auschwitz, it was at least a prisoner of war camp, where the Catholic Church owned some property and they were going to build a church there. They had every right to do it but they stepped aside and said, no, we are going to allow the Jewish people to make a monument because they lost lives," she said. "They had a responsibility to be sensitive to what had happened there and it is exactly the same thing as 9/11. Ground zero, we have a responsibility to be sensitive to the loss of a nation, to the loss of families, to the loss of life that happened there."
Angle seemed to be referring to a Roman Catholic convent at the Auschwitz death camp that Pope John Paul II ordered moved in 1993 in response to Jewish protests.
Others, including the Anti-Defamation League, the nation's leading Jewish civil rights group, have evoked the relocated convent while voicing opposition to the mosque. But the ADL also has stressed that 9/11 and the Holocaust are separate, incomparable events.
Angle's campaign did not answer questions about her statements.
"I'm pretty sure that she did make it clear that there had been incidents in the news, but there is nothing widespread, and that we have freedom of religion in this country," said spokesman Jarrod Agen in an e-mail.
Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington-based advocacy group, called Angle's statements "bizarre."
"This seems to be an example of incoherent bigotry. It is pretty clear that she has something against Islam and Muslims but she is so incoherent you don't know what she stands for," Hooper said. "The proper response would have been, 'American Muslims are citizens like anyone else. They are free to practice their faith,' not seeming to agree that Muslims are somehow seeking to take over."
Dearborn Mayor Jack O'Reilly called Angle's comments "shameful." He said tea party groups inaccurately spread the word that his Detroit suburb was ruled by Islamic law after members of an anti-Islam group were arrested at an Arab cultural festival in June because a Christian volunteer complained of harassment.
"She took it as face value and maligned the city of Dearborn and I consider that totally irresponsible," he said. "If she wants to come here, I will take her on a tour. I will show her we follow the Constitution just as well as anyone else."
Angle, a Southern Baptist, has called herself a faith-based politician. Among her positions, she opposes abortion in all circumstances, including rape and incest and doesn't believe the Constitution requires the separation of church and state.
Angle is in a dead-heat race against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who has also said the community center, which would include a mosque, should be built elsewhere. A recent poll showed Reid and Angle tied in the high-profile campaign.
Reid's campaign said Angle's comments advances its ongoing campaign to portray her as outside mainstream America.
"The fact that Sharron Angle believes American cities have been taken over by militant terrorist organizations that are ruling our citizens under Sharia law shows a terrifying lack of connection with reality and a willingness to subscribe to conspiracy theories that demonstrates she's far too extreme and dangerous to represent Nevada in the U.S. Senate," spokesman Kelly Steele said.

Exposing the Vatican-Islam Alliance

Exposing the Vatican-Islam Alliance


The Roman Catholic Church hailed UNESCO’s decision to grant the world heritage status to the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. According to the Vatican authorities, the UN decision is a “diplomatic victory” for the Palestinian Authority. Last Friday, the United Nations approved the Palestinian bid to place Jesus’ birthplace on its list of sites of World Heritage in danger. Israel called the decision “absurd” and “a sad day.”
The Palestinian agenda at UNESCO is the de-Judaization of the land of Israel by Islamicizing the holy sites. Oras Hamdan Taha, the Palestinian minister who deals with antiquities and gets funds from UNESCO, made clear, “it’s writing or rewriting the history of Palestine.” Less known is that the Vatican institutions are collaborating with the Palestinian autocracy.
The Vatican already declared its support of waving a Palestinian flag over the Temple Mount in the heart of ancient Jerusalem. Next in line is Rachel’s Tomb near Bethlehem, Judaism’s third most holy site, which for millennia has served as a place of longing, pilgrimage and prayer for the Jewish people. In 1996, Yasser Arafat’s Palestinian Authority began referring to the site as the “Bilal ibn Rabah Mosque,” and this is how UNESCO shamefully listed it in 2010.
Many Catholic groups worldwide already embraced the Palestinian myth. Pax Christi, one of the most famous Catholic organizations, on its website, repeatedly calls the Jewish site a “mosque.” Then there is the Bethlehem University of the Holy Land, the only Vatican-run educational institution in the area and whose founding can be traced back to the visit of Pope Paul VI in the holy land in 1964. The Catholic University recently launched a project about the Rachel’s Tomb. The document calls it “a historical religious site for followers of Christianity and Islam,” whose location is “on Palestinian lands.” The Vatican institution seems to ignore that all of Rachel’s Tomb belongs to Area C, which the Oslo Accords gave to Israeli jurisdiction. The very title of the Catholic project, “Rachel: An Alien in her Hometown,” suggests that the tomb is a spot hijacked by the Israelis. The tomb, the Catholic report says, “is also known by Muslims as the Bilal Ibn Rabah Mosque.” According to the Vatican university, the Jewish shrines are Arab treasures stolen by the Zionists and the Israelis are no more than invading colonizers.
A few months ago, Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Fouad Twal, welcomed enthusiastically the agreement reached between Hamas and Fatah, despite both the PLO and Hamas covenants’ call for the use of violence against the Jews. Last September, Patriarch Twal, named by Pope Benedict XVI, was at the White House for a meeting with the American administration — as well as for the purpose to support the PA statehood bid at the UN.
Last January eight Catholic bishops from Europe and North America, including UK Archbishop Patrick Kelly and French Archbishop Michel Dubost, visited Gaza under Hamas control. “I asked prisoners in the largest prison in Europe (in Evry) to pray for you,” Dubost told Gazans. The inference is clear: Palestinians are living in a big prison terrified by Israel. In the same period, Father Manuel Musalam, head of Gaza’s Catholics, met with Hamas leader, Mahmoud al Zahar, and declared that “Christians are not threatened by Muslims” but that everyone faces the same problem, that of Israel’s “humiliation.”
A few weeks earlier, the head of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales offered the Palestinians another piece of powerful propaganda: the comparison with Jesus’ passion. “We are to be freshly attentive to the needs of those who, like Jesus himself, are displaced and in discomfort,” Archbishop Vincent Nichols said during his last Christmas Mass sermon at Westminster Cathedral. “A shadow falls particularly heavily on the town of Bethlehem tonight … We pray for them tonight” It would have been more in keeping with Nicholas’ mission to mention hundreds of Christians losing their lives to Islamic terrorism and oppressed by Palestinian dictatorship.

How about a “comic book” form of publication of important suppressed history about the Jesuit/Vatican hand in the creation of Islam and Islam’s founder, the prophet Muhammad?

How about a “comic book” form of publication of important suppressed history about the Jesuit/Vatican hand in the creation of Islam and Islam’s founder, the prophet Muhammad?
 
According to the Introduction to what you are about to read:
“This information came from Alberto Rivera, former Jesuit priest, after his conversion to Protestant Christianity. It is excerpted from The Prophet, published by Chick Publications, P.O. Box 662, Chino CA 91708. Since its publication, after several unsuccessful attempts on his life, he died suddenly from food poisoning. His testimony should not be silenced. Dr. Rivera speaks to us still.”
"The Destruction of the Temple at Jerusalem" by Nicolas Poussin (1637)
More complete information and color illustrations of this and related materials are available for viewing and purchase from the www choosinglife.net/Islam.htm Internet website. (Note that the website address is case-sensitive to the capital I in the word Islam.)

Because of the provocative nature of this material, I (E.Y.) asked Rick Martin to contact SPECTRUM friend Eric Jon Phelps, author of the blockbuster research work VATICAN ASSASSINS, for his opinion.
 
This is what Eric wrote back via email:
“This is from the Chick comic book ‘Alberto’ series, titled The Prophet. And it is absolutely true. Islam is a sword of the Church evidenced by who the Moslems have killed for the last 100 years.”
Eric also said, in a later communication, that Dr. Alberto Rivera first publicly released this information back in 1988.

Of course, Eric would likely add another twenty pages of details to this document tracing the Jesuit hand in these shenanigans, but you’ll be able to spot that thread easily enough from what is related in the following narrative. (analysis by Eric Phelps of a recent example of the typically two-faced nature of Vatican propaganda as carried out through their controlled media puppetry.)

Pay attention to the overall picture being painted below; don’t get caught up in arcane theological language and related concepts that obviously derive from Dr. Rivera’s background. The Dark Energies, by any name, reveal themselves through their ACTIONS!

Also pay close attention to another thread running through the following narrative—one which provides important background for the long-running Arab-Israeli conflict. In beautiful contrast to what you’re programmed to believe through the media, that Arabs and Israelis can’t get along, elsewhere in this issue of The SPECTRUM is a very warm and personal account of some Jews sharing in the hospitality of some Arabs.

The actual (natural) inclination for people of even diverse backgrounds to generally live in peace and get along with each other on common human grounds always reveals when there has been the instigation of conditions (by diabolical ones operating behind the scenes) that are calculated to artificially provoke strife and war.
 
The following is a good example of just such behind-the-scenes shenanigans that are carried out by ones long overshadowed by the Dark Energies.

 

 
from ChoosingLife Website
recovered through WayBackMachine Website

What I’m going to tell you is what I learned in secret briefings in the Vatican when I was a Jesuit priest, under oath and induction.

A Jesuit cardinal named Augustine Bea showed us how desperately the Roman Catholics wanted Jerusalem at the end of the third century. Because of its religious history and its strategic location, the Holy City was considered a priceless treasure. A scheme had to be developed to make Jerusalem a Roman Catholic city. The great untapped source of manpower that could do this job was the children of Ishmael. The poor Arabs fell victim to one of the most clever plans ever devised by the Powers of Darkness.
Early Christians went everywhere with the gospel, setting up small churches, but they met heavy opposition. Both the Jews and the Roman government persecuted the believers in Christ to stop their spread.

But the Jews rebelled against Rome, and in 70 A.D. Roman armies under General Titus smashed Jerusalem and destroyed the great Jewish temple which was the heart of Jewish worship—in fulfillment of Christ’s prophecy in Matthew 24:2. On this holy place, where the temple once stood, the Dome of the Rock Mosque stands today as Islam’s second most holy place.

Sweeping changes were in the wind. Corruption, apathy, greed, cruelty, perversion, and rebellion were eating at the Roman Empire, and it was ready to collapse. The persecution against Christians was useless, as they continued to lay down their lives for the gospel of Christ.

The only way Satan could stop this thrust was to create a counterfeit “Christian” religion to destroy the work of God. The solution was in Rome. Their religion had come from ancient Babylon, and all it needed was a face-lift. This didn’t happen overnight, but began in the writings of the “early church fathers”.

It was through their writings that a new religion would take shape. The statue of Jupiter in Rome was eventually called St. Peter, and the statue of Venus was changed to the Virgin Mary. The site chosen for its headquarters was on one of the seven hills called “Vaticanus”—the place of diving serpent where the satanic Temple of Janus stood.

The great counterfeit religion was Roman Catholicism, called “Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth” (Revelation 17:5). She was raised up to block the gospel, slaughter the believers in Christ, establish religions, create wars, and make the nations drunk with the wine of her fornication as we will see.

Three major religions have one thing in common—each has a holy place where they look for guidance. Roman Catholicism looks to the Vatican as the Holy City. The Jews look to the wailing wall in Jerusalem, and the Muslims look to Mecca as their Holy City.
 
Each group believes that they receive certain types of blessings for the rest of their lives for visiting their holy place.

In the beginning, Arab visitors would bring gifts to the “House of God" and the keepers of the Kaaba were gracious to all who came. Some brought their idols and, not wanting to offend these people, their idols were placed inside the sanctuary. It is said that the Jews looked upon the Kaaba as an outlying tabernacle of the Lord, with veneration until it became polluted with idols.
The Kaaba, Mecca
 
In a tribal contention over a well (Zamzam) the treasure of the Kaaba and the offerings that pilgrims had given were dumped down the well and it was filled with sand; it disappeared. Many years later Adb al-Muttalib was given visions telling him where to find the well and its treasure. He became the hero of Mecca, and he was destined to become the grandfather of Muhammad.

Before this time, Augustine became the bishop of North Africa and was effective in winning Arabs to Roman Catholicism, including whole tribes. It was among these Arab converts to Catholicism that the concept of looking for an Arab prophet developed.

Muhammad’s father died from illness, and sons born to great Arab families in places like Mecca were sent into the desert to be suckled and weaned and spend some of their childhood with Bedouin tribes for training and to avoid the plagues in the cities.
 
After his mother and grandfather also died, Muhammad was with his uncle when a Roman Catholic monk learned of his identity and said:
“Take your brother’s son back to his country and guard him against the Jews, for by God, if they see him and know of him that which I know, they will construe evil against him. Great things are in store for this brother’s son of yours.”
The Roman Catholic monk had fanned the flames for future Jewish persecutions at the hands of the followers of Muhammad. The Vatican desperately wanted Jerusalem because of its religious significance, but was blocked by the Jews.

Another problem was the true Christians in North Africa who preached the gospel. Roman Catholicism was growing in power, but would not tolerate opposition. Somehow the Vatican had to create a weapon to eliminate both the Jews and the true Christian believers who refused to accept Roman Catholicism. Looking to North Africa, they saw the multitudes of Arabs as a source of manpower to do their dirty work.

Some Arabs had become Roman Catholic, and could be used in reporting information to leaders in Rome. Others were used in an underground spy network to carry out Rome’s master plan to control the great multitudes of Arabs who rejected Catholicism.

When “St. Augustine” appeared on the scene, he knew what was going on. His monasteries served as bases to seek out and destroy Bible manuscripts owned by the true Christians.

The Vatican wanted to create a messiah for the Arabs, someone they could raise up as a great leader, a man with charisma whom they could train, and eventually unite all the non-Catholic Arabs behind him, creating a mighty army that would ultimately capture Jerusalem for the pope.

In the Vatican briefing, Cardinal Bea told us this story:
A wealthy Arabian lady who was a faithful follower of the pope played a tremendous part in this drama. She was a widow named Khadijah. She gave her wealth to the church and retired to a convent, but was given an assignment.

She was to find a brilliant young man who could be used by the Vatican to create a new religion and become the messiah for the children of Ishmael.
 
Khadijah had a cousin named Waraquah, who was also a very faithful Roman Catholic, and the Vatican placed him in a critical role as Muhammad’s advisor. He had tremendous influence on Muhammad.

Teachers were sent to young Muhammad and he had intensive training. Muhammad studied the works of St. Augustine, which prepared him for his “great calling”. The Vatican had Catholic Arabs across North Africa spread the story of a great one who was about to rise up among the people and be the chosen one of their God.

While Muhammad was being prepared, he was told that his enemies were the Jews and that the only true Christians were Roman Catholic. He was taught that others calling themselves Christians were actually wicked impostors and should be destroyed. Many Muslims believe this.

Muhammad began receiving “divine revelations” and his wife’s Catholic cousin Waraquah helped interpret them. From this came the Koran. In the fifth year of Muhammad’s mission, persecution came against his followers because they refused to worship the idols in the Kaaba.

Muhammad instructed some of them to flee to Abysinnia, where Negus, the Roman Catholic king, accepted them because Muhammad’s views on the virgin Mary were so close to Roman Catholic doctrine. These Muslims received protection from Catholic kings because of Muhammad’s revelations.

Muhammad later conquered Mecca and the Kaaba was cleared of idols.
 
History proves that before Islam came into existence, the Sabeans in Arabia worshiped the moon-god who was married to the sun-god. They gave birth to three goddesses, who were worshipped throughout the Arab world as “Daughters of Allah”. An idol excavated at Hazor in Palestine in the 1950s shows Allah sitting on a throne with the crescent moon on his chest.

Muhammad claimed he had a vision from Allah and was told:
“You are the messenger of Allah.”
This began his career as a prophet and he received many messages. By the time Muhammad died, the religion of Islam was exploding. The nomadic Arab tribes were joining forces in the name of Allah and his prophet, Muhammad.

Some of Muhammad’s writings were placed in the Koran, others were never published. They are now in the hands of high ranking holy men (Ayatollahs) in the Islamic faith.
When Cardinal Bea shared this information with us in the Vatican, he said:
“These writings are guarded because they contain information that links the Vatican to the creation of Islam.”
Both sides have so much information on each other that, if exposed, it could create such a scandal that it would be a disaster for both religions. In their “holy” book, the Koran, Christ is regarded as only a prophet. If the pope was his representative on Earth, then he also must be a prophet of God. This caused the followers of Muhammad to fear and respect the pope as another “holy man”.

The pope moved quickly and issued bulls granting the Arab generals permission to invade and conquer the nations of North Africa.
 
The Vatican helped to finance the building of these massive Islamic armies in exchange for three favors:
  1. Eliminate the Jews and Christians (the latter were regarded as true believers, which they called infidels)
  2. Protect the Augustinian monks and Roman Catholics
  3. Conquer Jerusalem for “His Holiness” in the Vatican
As time went by, the power of Islam became tremendous—Jews and true Christians were slaughtered, and Jerusalem fell into their hands. Roman Catholics were never attacked, nor were their shrines, during this time. But when the pope asked for Jerusalem, he was surprised at their denial!
 
The Arab generals had such military success that they could not be intimidated by the pope—nothing could stand in the way of their own plan.

Under Waraquah’s direction, Muhammad wrote that Abraham offered Ishmael as a sacrifice. The Bible says that Isaac was the sacrifice, but Muhammad removed Isaac’s name and inserted Ishmael’s name. As a result of this and Muhammad’s vision, the faithful Muslims built a mosque, the Dome of the Rock, in Ishmael’s honor, on the site of the Jewish temple that was destroyed in 70 A.D. This made Jerusalem the second most holy place in the Islamic faith.
 
How could they give such a sacred shrine to the pope without causing a revolt?

The pope realized what they had created was out of control when he heard they were calling “His Holiness” an infidel. The Muslim generals were determined to conquer the world for Allah, and now they turned toward Europe.

Islamic ambassadors approached the pope and asked for papal bulls to give them permission to invade European countries. The Vatican was outraged; war was inevitable. Temporal power and control of the world was considered the basic right of the pope. He wouldn’t think of sharing it with those whom he considered heathens.
The pope raised up his armies and called them “crusades” to hold back the children of Ishmael from grabbing Catholic Europe. The crusades lasted for centuries and Jerusalem slipped out of the pope’s hands. Turkey fell, and Spain and Portugal were invaded by Islamic forces. In Portugal, they called a mountain village “Fatima” in honor of Muhammad’s daughter, never dreaming it would become world famous.

Years later, when the Muslim armies were poised on the islands of Sardinia and Corsica, to invade Italy, there was a serious problem. The Islamic generals realized they were too far extended. It was time for peace talks. One of the negotiators was Francis of Assisi. As a result, the Muslims were allowed to occupy Turkey in a “Christian” world, and the Catholics were allowed to occupy Lebanon in the Arab world. It was also agreed that the Muslims could build mosques in Catholic countries without interference, as long as Roman Catholicism could flourish in Arab countries.

Cardinal Bea told us in Vatican briefings that both the Muslims and Roman Catholics agreed to block and destroy the efforts of their common enemy: Bible-believing Christian missionaries. Through these concordats, Satan blocked the children of Ishmael from a knowledge of scripture and the truth.

The Islamic community looks on the Bible-believing missionary as a devil who brings poison to the children of Allah. This explains years of ministry in those countries with little results.

The Vatican also engineers a campaign of hatred between the Muslim Arabs and the Jews. Before this, they had co-existed peacefully. A light control was kept on Muslims— from the Ayatollah, down through the Islamic priests, nuns, and monks.

The next plan was to control Islam. In 1910, Portugal was going Socialistic. Red flags were appearing and the Catholic Church was facing a major problem. Increasing numbers were against the Church.

The Jesuits wanted Russia involved, and the location of this vision at Fatima could play a key part in pulling Islam to the Mother Church. In 1917, the Virgin appeared in Fatima. “The Mother of God” was a smashing success, playing to overflow crowds. As a result, the Socialists of Portugal suffered a major defeat.

Roman Catholics worldwide began praying for the conversion of Russia, and the Jesuits invented the novenas to Fatima, which they could perform throughout North Africa, spreading good public relations to the Muslim world. The Arabs thought they were honoring the daughter of Muhammad, which is what the Jesuits wanted them to believe.

As a result of the vision of Fatima, Pope Pius XII ordered his Nazi army to crush Russia and the Orthodox religion, and make Russia Roman Catholic. A few years after he lost World War II, Pope Pius XII startled the world with his phony “dancing Sun” vision to keep Fatima in the news. It was great religious show biz and the world swallowed it. Not surprisingly, Pope Pius was the only one to see this vision.

As a result, a group of followers has grown into a Blue Army worldwide, totaling millions of faithful Roman Catholics ready to die for the Blessed Virgin. But we haven’t seen anything yet. The Jesuits have their Virgin Mary scheduled to appear four or five times in China, Russia, and major appearance in the U.S.

What has this got to do with Islam?

Note Bishop Sheen’s statement:
“Our Lady’s appearances at Fatima marked the turning point in the history of the world’s 350 million Muslims. After the death of his daughter, Muhammad wrote that she ‘is the most holy of all women in Paradise, next to Mary.’ He believed that the Virgin Mary chose to be known as Our Lady of Fatima as a sign and a pledge that the Muslims who believe in Christ’s virgin birth, will come to believe in his divinity.”
Bishop Sheen pointed out that the pilgrim virgin statues of Our Lady of Fatima were enthusiastically received by Muslims in Africa, India, and elsewhere, and that many Muslims are now coming into the Roman Catholic Church.

DR. ALBERTO RIVERA
1988

References
  • Double Cross, Chick Publ, pgs 13,14.
  • The Meaning Of The Glorious Koran, Pickthall, Mentor Books, pgs 220,221.
  • Muhammad, Martin Lings, pgs 81-84.
 

 
 
Editor’s note:
Most readers of this publication are aware of the eye-opening book VATICAN ASSASSINS and its engaging author, Eric Jon Phelps. (See inside back cover.) In our popular May 2000 issue, we introduced Eric for the first time in a front-page feature interview about the well-hidden, high-level Jesuit aspect of world control and their leader, the so-called Black” Pope.

Another article in this issue of The SPECTRUM provides great insight into the Jesuit/Vatican hand in the creation of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad. We see the modern effects of these manufactured “religious” tools of manipulation and division of peoples everywhere around the globe—and particularly in the boiling Middle East.

While Eric’s remarkable Jesuit-connection research has stood up quite well to the test of scrutiny, that such a realm of global manipulation could have been so well concealed for so long is just too much for some so-called conspiracy authors to accept. Or they are beholden to other agendas which cause them to “act blind” to The Truth.

With that said, we share the following analysis with you from Eric, who even provides his own introduction. If you look beyond the religious terminology behind which so many power plays unfold, what he has to say most clearly acts as an instructive exercise to help us not fall into obvious traps set up by those of a cunning and devious nature who are experts at making things seem to be what they are not.
 
After all, their boss is the Great Deceiver himself!
6/26/02
ERIC JON PHELPS

Dear Friends,
This article [below] has been written by a brilliant and noted author who blamed the Pope’s Mossad of Zionist Israel as the true power behind the Kennedy Assassination. He bases his premise upon the fact that the late Yitzak Rabin was in Dallas on November 22, 1963 according to his late wife, Leah.

He knows of me and is aware of my book VATICAN ASSASSINS. Still he maintains the false position that the Jews control the American Media while refusing to admit to the primacy of the Jesuit Order within the Pope’s Holy Roman Fourteenth Amendment American Empire (1868-Present) ruled through the Archbishop of New York’s Council on Foreign Relations.

The Jews manning the Order’s American Press are the Pope’s “Court Jews”—the Masonic Jewish Zionists— and nearly all are members of the Council on Foreign Relations. This brings us to the three primary purposes of the Pope’s Masonic Jewish Zionists.

They are:
  1. To take Jerusalem from the Moslems FOR THE POPE. This was accomplished during the Six-Day War in 1967.
  2. To deed over Jerusalem to the Papacy FOR THE POPE. This was accomplished in 1993 by Yossi Belin and Jesuit-trained Shimon Peres when the treasonous Oslo Accord functioned as an international diversion.
  3. To create anti-Jewish fury in foreign nations for the purpose of driving the Jews of those nations back to the Pope’s Zionist Israel in preparation for the ultimate “Final Solution to the Jewish Question”.
The future Satan-possessed risen Pope will make one last mad attempt to kill the physical descendants of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David—and thus the physical descendants of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Rather than merely forward this article to you, I felt compelled to comment as to its content and erroneous conclusion promulgated therein. Therefore I shall comment in bold.
— Eric Jon Phelps
 

Vatican Links Israeli Influence To Media Attacks
by Michael Collins Piper
(6/15/02)

The Vatican has issued a not-so-subtle blast at the influence of the Israeli lobby over the American media monopoly. This is news that the media (not surprisingly) is keeping under wraps.

You won’t read about it in your daily newspaper or hear Dan Rather or Tom Brokaw talking about it on television, but Civilta Cattolica—an influential Jesuit journal sanctioned by the Vatican—has fired a volley at the American media for its obsessive coverage of the Catholic Church sex scandals.
[Civilta Cattolica (“Catholic Civilization” i.e. “World Government under the Pope”) is THE Jesuit house organ of the Vatican. Whatever is written here comes straight from the mouth of the Black Pope. This is the periodical that I quoted in VATICAN ASSASSINS which declared that “Fascism is the regime that corresponds most closely to the concepts of the Church of Rome.”]
What is most significant is that in tracing the media’s interest in the Church’s troubles, the Vatican has hinted at the behind-the-scenes power of the inter-connected handful of powerful pro-Israel families and financial interests who dominate the media monopoly in shaping the media’s news coverage.
[Now it’s time to blame the Jews in general. Does not Mr. Piper realize that the Council on Foreign Relations controls the Press? Sure he does! Who, dear reader, do you think is more powerful, Henry Kissinger, a CFR Presider, or the President of the Jesuits’ Fordham University in New York, Joseph A. O’Hare, another CFR Presider and Jesuit under Extreme Oath?

Is not Fox News affiliated with the CFR?
 
Of course it is, and its Director is Knight of Malta Rupert Murdoch, a porn king and promoter of the Jenin Massacre Hoax that was intended to ignite anti-Jewish fury within America. No—the JESUITS have used their controlled press, employing their Masonic Jewish Zionists, to expose the scandal of America’s Roman Hierarchy. The $64,000 question is: WHY!]
Published on June 1 the Vatican-approved article flatly asserts that—at least in part because the Catholic Church refused to support the much-ballyhooed and media-promoted Persian Gulf War against Saddam Hussein in 1991—the controllers of the American media monopoly have nursed a grudge against the Church.
[This is absolutely ridiculous!

The Vatican, controlled by the Jesuits since 1814 upon their restoration by Pope Pius VII, caused the Persian Gulf War in 1991. The Jesuits controlled both sides, using brother Freemasons and business partners President George H. W. Bush and Saddam Hussein.

That war was waged against the Moslem peoples of Iraq, not against Saddam Hussein, as he is still in power. The Vatican-controlled CFR/Jesuit Press may have OPENLY opposed the war—just like it OPENLY opposed Hitler’s extermination of the Jewish people; just as it OPENLY refused to recognize the Nation of Israel until 1993. But the Vatican’s SECRET policy was to support the Gulf War, Hitler’s Jewish genocide, and the Zionist Nation of Israel.

The Pope always has TWO POLICIES—like the two-headed Janus that he is. One is OPEN and FALSE, intended for public confusion; the other is SECRET and TRUE, which is in fact the Black Pope’s agenda.]
And while, in this context, the Vatican doesn’t say it directly, it is absolutely beyond question that it was the pro-Israel lobby that was the prime mover behind the war against Saddam who has long been perceived as one of Israel’s greatest enemies.
[The pro-Israel lobby?

There is no greater pro-Israel lobby than the Federal Reserve Bank, its primary class-A stockholders being New York banks managed by the Pope’s Knights of Malta, past men like Francis X. Stankard of Chase Manhattan Bank and Martin F. Shea of Citibank. The Director of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is the Jesuit-trained economist, Irish Roman Catholic and Papal Knight, William J. McDonough, though the Order has placed a CFR Masonic Jew to head the Federal Reserve Board, Alan Greenspan.

And all these Papal Knights were or are members of the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR is the pro-Zionist Government of Israel lobby, all the while plotting the mass murder of the Jewish people within Israel, once they have been used to rebuild Solomon’s Temple—for the Pope! Saddam Hussein is an enemy of the Jewish people but not the enemy of the Pope’s Masonic Jewish Zionist government.

If Hussein is an enemy of the Pope’s Zionist Israel, then why did the Pope’s CFR use the American Military-Industrial Complex to arm him with biological, conventional, and nuclear weapons? Simple: Those weapons are to be used in a future war with an otherwise invincible American Military.
 
Once we invade Iraq, just watch which weapons are used both in Central Asia and inside the borders of America.]
In addition, in recent months—since the Sept. 11 attacks—Israel’s American lobby (actively abetted by the media monopoly) continued to push for war against Iraq, despite the fervent opposition of career American military leaders, including the entire Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Again, Israel’s American lobby is indeed abetted by the Pope’s CFR media monopoly. Indeed, it pushed for war with Iraq—which is exactly what the Jesuit General wants—so that whatever calamities befall America as a result of that war, American Jews can be scapegoated, persecuted, and then driven back to Israel, fulfilling the dream of the Black Pope’s Ariel Sharon: increasing the population of Israel by one million Jews within fifteen years.

This immigration will further secure Jerusalem for the Pope, using the Jewish people as a human shield against any Moslem who would dare to foil the rebuilding of the Pope’s new Temple. This means that the Palestinian agitation will be ended. The Joint Chiefs of Staff are all CFR members. If they opposed a war with Iraq, why have NONE of them resigned, refusing to commit such a travesty against a people betrayed by their Masonic leader, Saddam Hussein?

The SECRET policy of the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs is to wage the Black Pope’s war against the Iraqi people for expelling the Jesuit Order in 1969. Payback time has arrived once again for the Iraqis.]
Given that—as the record indicates—the media’s sudden and intense interest in the Church’s problems did, in fact, evolve after Sept. 11, it is interesting to note that Civilta Cattolica also cited the aftermath of 9/11 in its dissection of the media’s attacks on the Church.
 
The journal suggested that the Catholic Church’s appeals against “vendettas” against the Arab and Muslim world in the wake of 9/11 also offended the media, which has been heavily promoting an anti-Arab and anti-Muslim agenda, often quoting so-called “experts” on terrorism and on the Middle East who are—more often than not—advocates of Israeli policy and often directly affiliated with Israeli intelligence.
[Yes, the Pope’s CFR/Jesuit-controlled media empire exposed the scandal of the Roman Hierarchy after 9/11. This had a dual purpose:
  1. to get the attention off the clues leading to CIA complicity in the demolition of the WTC, the CIA being directed by the Archbishop Egan’s CFR member and Knight of Malta, George J. Tenet
  2. to justify a secret meeting of the Pope’s thirteen American Cardinals, during which Council of War, deep inside the Vatican, their roles could be well defined during the coming destruction of apostate Protestant America
Forget reform.
 
It will never happen as long as that doctrine of demons called celibacy is still in force. Israeli Intelligence is a creation of the Black Pope’s CIA, as shown in VATICAN ASSASSINS.

Reinhard Gehlen, Hitler’s most sinister General and Knight of Malta, trained the Mossad with his ex-Nazis. The source for this fact is none other than the brilliant John Loftus, as found in his The Secret War Against The Jews.

And yes, most Jewish broadcasters, like Michael Savage and Chuck Morse, have heavily promoted the Black Pope’s war against Afghanistan, which war must ultimately move on to Iraq if the “war on terror is to be won”—so we are told.]
 
Big Problem

While no one excuses either the Vatican or other Church officials for misfeasance, malfeasance, or non-feasance in handling the travesty of sexual abuse by priests, the truth is that the problem has been one of long standing and has really been no secret whatsoever.
[Correct. Then why would the Jesuits expose it now?]
It was only after Sept. 11—as any content analysis of daily news coverage will affirm— that the American media began devoting so much space to the problem to the point that the term Catholic” is now become almost synonymous in many people’s minds with “pedophilia—a scourge which is, by no means, limited to any one religious affiliation.
 
Some critics allege, for example, that pedophilia is actually advocated in portions of the Talmud.
[We are getting off point here. Do not use this Jesuit ruse of war, Mr. Piper. The Roman Hierarchy, at which the Jesuit Order laughs while being outside of its jurisdiction, has been known for centuries as sexual predators of the worst sort. The closed cloistered convents have been houses of prostitution in every country, for which reason Republican Spain closed them all and expelled the Jesuits in 1932.

And the damnable doctrine of priestial celibacy is its impetus. Simply read ex-priest Charles Chiniquy’s The Priest, The Woman, And The Confessional, written in the late nineteenth century. All will become crystal clear.]
Although there are elements who promote the bizarre and totally outlandish theory that all of the great tragedies of history can be attributed to the Vatican— including the Bolshevik Revolution, both World War I and World War II, and even the assassination of America’s first Catholic president, John F. Kennedy—the record suggests otherwise.
[Mr. Piper is referring to me here. I promote this “bizarre and totally outlandish theory” that all of the great tragedies of history for the last 450 years can be attributed to the Vatican—and I prove it in VATICAN ASSASSINS with an irrefutable chain of evidence. The record does not suggest otherwise. WHO BENEFITS, Mr. Piper? Always the Jesuits, as they use their Masonic Jewish Zionists to fulfill their grand design. To deny this irrefutable fact is to betray your true colors.]
The Vatican’s criticism of the media giants is not a new development.
[The Vatican always has TWO policies when implementing its Hegelian Dialectic: one is OPEN, which is the FALSE, and one is SECRET, which is the TRUE.]
Several years ago, speaking before Corallo, the consortium of independent local radio and television channels in Italy, Pope John Paul II cited the rise of global media monopolies and emphasized the need for “local information”—that is, media voices outside the hands of the powerful media barons.
 
The pope said that “communication has become the soul which shapes the culture of our time” and stressed what he called the “dignity” of independent media.
[This is the Pope’s lying and false OPEN policy of the Jesuit General. It is intended to mislead us into thinking that the Vatican is for free enterprise—a free press, contrary to the Order’s Council of Trent which CONDEMNS FREEDOM OF SPEECH—when it is actually the master of the Fortune 500 corporations, many of which compose America’s CFR media monopoly.]
Observers say the fact that the Vatican has fired back at its enemies—citing their hidden motivations—indicates this “warning shot across the bow” could very well point toward a new, bold approach to world affairs by the Catholic Church which, for the last 50 years, has approached its dealings with Israel and its worldwide supporters in a most gingerly fashion.
[Indeed, the Vatican’s Jesuits, having used their Masonic Jewish Zionist agitators, have laid the foundation for firing at their age-old enemies. Those enemies are the Jewish people and any who would come to their defense—like us Bible-believing White Anglo-Saxon Protestant and Baptist Calvinists. But we have weathered not only “warning shots” but a thousand fields of battle in resisting the machinations of the Black Pope as he attempts to reduce every nation to the “Temporal Power of the Papal Caesar” in his bold attempt to rule the world from Jerusalem.

We know that the Pope has ALWAYS had a bold approach to world affairs, that approach being anything but “gingerly”.
 
For the creation of the Pope’s Zionist Israel required the “gingerly” mass extermination of two-thirds of European Jewry and millions of Russian Jews, to the delight of Jesuit-trained Joseph Stalin. The subjugation of Russia and China required the “gingerly” extermination of fifty-million Chinese and millions of Orthodox Russians in gulags of Siberia.

No, Mr. Piper, the Jesuits in control of the Vatican will continue their mass murder of “heretics and liberals” for the next fifty years—ever true to their Satanic Jesuit Oath of the Fourth Vow. And the Order’s “Skull and BonesGeorge W. Bush—who during his initiation “kissed the slippered toe of the Pope”—has started this new century off with a bang.

That bang will be the death knell to millions of “infidel” Moslems, “liberal” Roman Catholics, and “heretic” Bible-believers and “perfidious Jews” to the orgasmic delight of the Black Pope and his master.]