Saturday, December 14, 2013

Hoax and High Treason… Adam Lanza Never Existed!… Sandy Hook School Was Not an Operating School at Time of Shooting!

Hoax and High Treason… Adam Lanza Never Existed!… Sandy Hook School Was Not an Operating School at Time of Shooting!

Sandy Hook poses so many uncertainties and even contradictions that it should come as no surprise that virtually every aspect of whatever happened is being subjected to the most minute scrutiny.
~ Several Videos – Audio – Photos

I have now published multiple articles about it here at Veterans Today, including “Sandy Hook: Huge Hoax and anti-Gun ‘Psy Op’”, where others, such as historian of science and expert on 7/7, Nicholas Kollerstrom, have addressed the parallels between those events.
On one web site, I have even been asked by a serious but skeptical reader whether it is even possible that none of the children were actually killed.
The question is not as unwarranted as most of the public might believe. If this had been a real shooting of children, there would have been a sense of panic and of hysteria.
EMTs would have rushed into the school building. The children would have been rushed out on stretchers and into ambulances and other vehicles and rushed to a hospital for doctors to treat them and formally pronounce the death of those who had been killed. Nothing remotely like this happened.
The police cordoned off everyone from the school. No one was allowed to see the bodies. They were transported in the dead of night. It was simply bizarre beyond belief.
A resourceful student has turned up visual evidence that Sandy Hook was not even an operating school, which, if she is right, discloses the stunning enormity of the hoax:
These considerations already indicate that Sandy Hook was a fabricated or staged event. I wish it were not the case, but that conclusion is reinforced by multiple peculiarities about photographs and other matters, extending to conflicting reports about whether the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza, was a student at the school or not; whether his mother was a teacher there or not.
Police radio reports in real time of two perps heading toward the reporting officer, one of whom was apprehended, the other fled into the woods and was tracked in helicopter footage.
Concern that this is an elaborate “psy op” to create hysteria in the hearts of the American people and bring about a stampede of public support for the confiscation of every semi-automatic weapon in the country, as Sen. Diane Feinstein’s bill would impose, are open to serious question in light of the discovery that, in the Social Security Death Index, Adam Lanza is reported to have died on the 13th, the day before the “massacre”:
After all, if Adam died the day before, he cannot have slaughtered those 20 children and six adults (seven, including his mother) on the following day. And the matter has been compounded by the rediscovery that… all three of the major networks–ABC, NBC and CBS–reported that his body had been found accompanied by hand guns (whose numbers range from two to four), while the alleged “assault right” was left in the car!
The reporter all confirmed that they had verified the information they were presenting with state and federal officals. But if these murders were committed with hand guns, then the justification for a ban on assault weapons on the basis of these events is non-existent.
Indeed, it appears that the Sandy Hook story is turning out to be a much bigger event than it would have been had it actually been authentic.
As a former Marine Corps officer who qualified with a .45 and a rifle four years in a row (from 1962-66) and occasionally shot expert with the M-14, I have found it very difficult to imagine how this young man of slight build, who appears to have had little or even no marksmanship training, could possibly have pulled it off.
I supervised marksmanship at Edson Range, Camp Pendleton, as a Series Commander at the USMC Recruit Depot, San Diego, CA, and the ratio of target to kills strikes me as not merely extremely improbable but virtually impossible, especially if he was using hand guns but even with a Bushmaster.
The probability that he killed anyone on the 14th when he appears to have died on the 13th does not require emphasis.
An especially informative interview recently took place between Joyce Riley and Mike Powers on “The Power Hour”:
The New York Times has entered the fray by publishing “Reliving Horror and Faint Hope at Massacre Site” (28 January 2013), in which it recounts the horrific experiences of five of law enforcement officers who were among the first on the scene at Sandy Hook. Like many other articles about the shooting, it makes a strong appeal to the emotions but is short on proof:
NEWTOWN, Conn. – The gunfire ended; it was so quiet they could hear the broken glass and bullet casings scraping under their boots. The smell of gunpowder filled the air. The officers turned down their radios; they did not want to give away their positions if there was still a gunman present.
They found the two women first, their bodies lying on the lobby floor. Now they knew it was real. But nothing, no amount of training, could prepare them for what they found next, inside those two classrooms.
“One look, and your life was absolutely changed,” said Michael McGowan, one of the first police officers to arrive at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14, as a gunman, in the space of minutes, killed 20 first graders and 6 adults.
Questions that are not explored by The New York Times include why there were no EMTs rushing to aide the victims, why there was no rash of ambulances to transport them to the hospital, why the officers on the scene were the ones to declare them dead, and why not even their parents were allowed to identify their children. Too tough for The Times, it appears.
As Miles Mathis has observed in “Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theories debunked? No”, the government likes to hire people to run this gambit:
[T]hey publish some ridiculously weak response as a debunking, it utterly fails to debunk anything, but then simply because it got published by top outlets they claim the theory has been debunked. Go study just about any tragedy or big news story of the past 50 years, and you will see the same progression.
[Specifically, you can study Popular Mechanics' pathetic efforts to debunk 911 Truth by this method.]
I have news for them, publishing an article with the title Debunked does not automatically mean the theory has been debunked. You actually have to make a strong argument. Blowing smoke for a couple of pages isn’t a debunking, it is just more propaganda, and most people who read these things can see that.
The debunking of 911 didn’t work, because the debunking was exponentially weaker than the data it was trying to debunk.Most people now recognize that fact. We are seeing the same thing here with Sandy Hook.
To prove this, Miles Mathis goes “point for point” through the debunking of Salon writer Alex Seitz-Wald, demonstrating that he has done no more than deploy “3rd-string debating tricks and cold cabbage” and that his title constitutes a case of false advertising, “Your comprehensive answer to every Sandy Hook conspiracy theory”.
Indeed, he also explains, there are also multiple indications that photos have been shopped, including this “Christmas pose” by the Robbie Parker family, whose daughter, Emily, appears to have posted with President Obama when he visited Newtown to convey his sympathies. which has been scrutinized in several venues.
An excellent discussion of some of these issues includes of this photograph:
Among the oddities in this case–where the image of Emily on the right appears to have been added in and she is not being encompassed by her father’s arms–is the prevalence of “threes” among the fingers that are being displayed.
Her mother on the left has two fingers melded together to create the image of three and Robbie himself is displaying three on each hand, while the youngest not only is showing three with her right but creating an image associated with Satanic worship with her mouth and hand.
Even the other daughter, Madeleine, seems to have made a similar sign with her partially obscured hand. Without alleging a connection to the Church of Satan, which has an active chapter in Newtown, CT, it seems rather bizarre.
Other sites offer more extensive and detailed analysis of possible photographic fakery, including the use of “green screens” and that Adam Lanza appears to have died the day before.
In the following essay, Dennis Cimino does his best to sort out what has been going on across the country, because Sandy Hook appears to be the lastest in a series of contrived events of increasing violence, which may be designed to motivate the American people to surrender their Second Amendment rights and embrace all-encompassing forms of gun control, which has already happened in New York.
The new legislation includes items such as police registry of assault weapons, limiting the number of bullets in magazines and more preventative measures to keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill. The proposal would target not just the sale of new assault weapons, but also those already in private hands.
Current and future owners will be mandated to register the weapons, creating a paper trail even for secondhand firearms. New sales would require background checks, and the sale of assault weapons on the internet would be banned entirely.
At the moment, assault weapon owners are allowed to possess ten bullets, but with the proposal, this number would be reduced to seven, with the penalty of a misdemeanor charge if caught with more than eight bullets.
Those who know that the Department of Homeland Security has acquired 1.5 billion rounds of .40 caliber, hollow-point ammunition, which is not even permissible in combat under the Hague Convention of 1899…
that there are more than 300 FEMA camps around the country for the concentration of dissidents and…
that a Senate Subcommittee on Homeland Security and Intelligence has concluded that any domestic “terrorist threat” is either negligible or even non-existent has to ask why a department with no foreign obligations would need to acquire such a massive stockpile of ammunition of that kind–and has now requisitioned 7,000 assault rifles for its own “protection”. These are not speculations, but brute facts!
Whether or not the draconian gun control measures enacted by New York virtually overnight are going to have the intended effect, however, is very much an open question. My own opinion–as a former Marine Corps officer but also a retired college professor–is that the country is on the verge of a massive civil war, which may even be the outcome that the traitors desire, where those who attempt to enforce these new measured may find themselves the targets of retaliation:
Yes, we are talking about the potential of a New York guerilla war where those who participate in gun confiscation are put on “fair game” lists to be targeted and taken out. This is what is being discussed across the ‘net, on blogs, in personal conversations, on radio shows and elsewhere.
I was as surprised to learn this as you may be right now. The reaction to Cuomo’s gun grab has been outspoken and powerful. Apparently I am not the only one in America who has committed to defending my liberties with my life, if necessary. There are a great many law-abiding citizens of this country who have joined together in saying “THIS is our line in the sand! Do NOT cross this line!”
Cuomo has crossed that line, and although for the record I do not advocate the use of violence to resolve conflicts, I cannot help but admit that Cuomo may very well be placing his own life, the life of his family members, and the lives of his staffers in imminent danger if he does not reverse his decision. What’s brewing right now is a kind of civil war in New York, and there are apparently all kinds of gun owners across the state who are prepared to die rather than register their firearms.
In “Israel’s Plan for World War enters high gear”, Gordon Duff, Senior Editor of Veterans Today, outlines the world-wide implications of the confiscation movement taking place here in the United States and how it possibly fits into the broader Israeli agenda, where those of us who have suggested that the Mossad may have been behind Sandy Hook–even if that was only in part–are looking better and better with the passage of time:
In 1878, congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act. From Cornell Law School, “Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse Comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”
Current police organizations, now under control of “Fusion Centers” run by the Department of Homeland Security, and armed with heavy military weapons, are directly in violation of this act and are, thus, in unconstitutional.
However, search of Google and Wikipedia will show systematic cleansing and editing to obscure this vital American safeguard. Google, Youtube and Wikipedia have long been used by Israeli intelligence as “playgrounds” for game theory warfare against America.
Dividing America and pushing it to the edge of civil war is the task of the Israel lobby led by Senator’s Feinstein and Schumer. With the support of the largest police organization, the IACP (International Association of Chiefs of Police), Feinstein’s bill is filled with “stealth” provisions for gun inspections in homes, special licensing and is aimed at disarming veterans.
Enacting AIPAC’s gun confiscation law will require, not only the shelving of the constitution’s second amendment, but the first, fourth, fifth, ninth and tenth as well.
Any bill that mandates “storage” and “transportation” will establish databases, endless paid informants and illegal searches of all persons, properties and vehicles without “probable cause.”
With full support of police organizations, fully militarized and Israeli controlled, at the behest of key Israeli members of the US government, an undeniable effort to bring America to civil war is fully underway as we speak.
While Gordon Duff (above) and Dennis Cimino (below) both posit Zionists promoting Israel as the main group wanting to disarm the US general population–both to help their wars and to subordinate the American people to politicians whom they can largely control–there are many other diverse elements in the international banking and domestic gun-confiscating movement whose interests do not always converge with those of Israel, which should be borne in mind in evaluating the situation.
The gun agenda has become preeminent–and it is being driven by multiple motives. The roles of the Mossad, the CIA and DHS have become increasingly difficult to sort out, where even our best efforts may fall short. The goal of gun control is to reduce our ability to resist tyranny!
The Nexus of Tyranny: The strategy behind Tucson, Aurora and Sandy Hook
By Dennis Cimino
In the immediate aftermath of the Newtown staged hoax in Connecticut, many of us began to finally take harder looks at the hoaxes staged in Tucson, Arizona, and in Aurora, Colorado, to see if we could find links connecting them.
They appear to have been carried out by Attorney General Eric Holder and POTUS (aka Barry Soetoro) as a calculated and nation-wide smattering of “terrorist attacks” of an OPERATION GLADIO variety, plotted and carried out to strike fear into the American public and create an hysterical response against the 2nd amendment.
Their secondary purpose seems to have been to further demonize 9/11 Truth, as was evident in the closure of facebook accounts of most of the prominent 9/11 Truth figures who were involved in publicizing Israel’s role in the mass murders of 9/11, which occurred in the immediate aftermath of the Newtown hoax.
The key begins in Tucson where the acting Sheriff, Clarence Dupnik, and his auxiliaries, staged the elaborate hoax that a federal judge and a Congress woman named “Gabby Giffords” were shot, the judge fatally. While Gabby may have been seriously seriously wounded, I have found multiple indications that suggest this, too, may have been a hoax.
Evidence of purely FEMA-staged acting was apparent in the fact that, when you do careful analysis of the photos of the scene, you can find many significant clues.
One striking one is a FEMA coach, kneeling by a stretcher, cue-card in his NON-GLOVED hands, reading that, with a small plastic cup of fake blood there, at a site where allegedly real human beings were shot by an orange hair whacko named ‘Holmes’ that is so psychologically goofy looking you can barely stand to look at him, let alone realize he is like the rest, another GREENBERG Zionist actor, participating in one of a series of hoaxes.
Here we have one of these FEMA crisis actors reading a CUE CARD, no gloves, at the side of an allegedly wounded person at the scene:
What is particularly telling in the photo of Giffords with an allegedly grave head wound, nobody seems concerned. All backs are turned. In real life if you had a potentially mortally wounded person being taken by an ambulance to a hospital, every one of those people would have been focused on her.
Look at them. Nobody cares. Nobody is concerned. Not one person seems in a hurry to move her to the ambulance either. You know this is a DRILL, because of the lack of concern and urgency in these people around this simulated victim or “VicSIM”.
Closer examination of the stretcher that Giffords is on, is that no blood is present, and her aide who stated he had “used his own hands to pressure point stop a head wound bleed” oddly has no blood on his gloved hands at all. Neither do any of the EMT personnel transporting her to the ambulance.
As many of you might know, head wounds bleed profusely yet Giffords has no blood on her except a small red patch on a rag wrapped around her skull.
If the lightbulb hasn’t gone on for you yet, it should when you see photos of two of Dupnik’s elderly SHERIFF’S AUXILLIARY pretending to be VICTIM RELATIVES at the alleged but simulated crime scene. They appear to be accomplices to an act of TREASON by Clarence W. Dupnik, the Pima County Sheriff.
In the case of the Aurora, CO, hoax staged fraud, we have an FBI agent standing behind the Chief of Police of Aurora, watching the Chief read his cue card in his head, while Special Agent Jim Yacone smirks in satisfaction when the Chief says he is not prepared to comment about how the shooter may have gotten into the theatre.
In the immediate aftermath of this shooting hoax, we have a number of witnesses talk about at least two individuals being involved and flash-bang grenades being thrown into the theatre from different directions by two individuals.
Clearly, on a day like this, no FBI agent has the right to ‘smirk’ about anything the Chief of Police might divulge, nor would there be any reason for many witnesses to talk about the fact that clearly the assault on the theatre, all staged and a hoax, came from both sides of the theatre and was carried out by more than one person.
So, here again, if HOLMES was the man, who were his accomplices? We know someone came in from both sides and threw flash bang grenades into the small theatre. One man could not do that.
In the Newtown, CT, shooting, where we have been told 20 children and 6 adults were slaughtered, many very big and inexplicable similarities were evident, looking rather like a repetition from Tucson and Aurora, least with the use of GREENBERG’s actor cadre, the CRISIS ACTORS FROM FEMA.
We have Dawn Hochsprung, who was allegedly killed shielding children from the lone gunman, giving an interview to The Newtown BEE newspaper that morning.
Clearly this is not merely a misunderstanding here: no reporter would give an interview and not clarify who that was they were talking to. Yet Hochsprung was alive enough to give that interview in the aftermath of a shooting in which she died trying to shield children from bullets. Not possible.
We have CNN video of SWAT team members running to the school door through a column of previously arranged orange traffic cones. Expecting someone important that day, where they? Especially since this was footage intentionally shown by CNN of a drill that had actually been staged at the school months before.
A bigger clue is that the crack sealant used to seal the driveway in some of the shots was nice and shiny and fresh, but no long thereafter, it’s dull and dirty and aged. That cannot happen in one day.
So definitively we now know the earlier drill was used by CNN in more than one NON LIVE shot of what allegedly took place on December 14th., but clearly did not as it was obviously a HOAX. All of it. Purposely staged to deceive the American public to grab guns from them.
In the helicopter footage which is now disappearing from YouTube, you see at around 7 AM a helicopter hovering over the scene with a DETROIT fire truck in the footage.
EMS is staged far back at the Fire Station and almost nobody is closer than 100 yards or so from the school, and with this video being about two hours before shooting happened, it elicits many questions again about ‘how’ and ‘why’ we are able to see it on a day when we were told that a kid got the drop on a security door and nobody was forewarned that he was attempting to gain entry.
Crisis Actors and the Coroner’s Press Conference
Now it has been firmly established that many CRISIS ACTORS were used in Newtown, the most notable one is Robbie Parker, who is told ‘just read the card’ and has to get into character to act ‘distraught’ when moments before he is seen smirking and laughing, very much like FBI agent Yacone had in Aurora at the Chief of Police press conference.
I don’t know about you, but nobody can explain away his very poor acting here, and nobody can explain the “just read the card” scenario, either. In virtually all of the follow up interviews of parents, they are all dry eyed and not puffy faced, although they are said to have lost their children. This is acting. By CRISIS ACTORS. By GREENBERG CRISIS ACTORS.
Later that day we have the coroner, Wayne Carver, who is oddly out of character, telling us that all of the vicSIMS were shot using the long rifle, the .223 caliber one and that some vicSIMS had been shot more than ten times.
Nobody bothered to ask Wayne why nobody was airlifted to Danbury General for possible salvation as it is not possible that nobody would survive any shooting involving 27 people, under any remote stretch of the imagination.
Someone would have been found clinging to life, yet no triage existed that day to ascertain this, and someone mysteriously, not this flakey-acting coroner, had decreed that all were ‘dead’ on the scene.
This again is not possible. That is not proper code BLUE protocol. You triage. You air lift. You try to save people. Not at Newtown, where they all died instantaneously and were declared DEAD by someone other than the medical examiner that day. By whom? By what authority?
James Tracy has a brilliant critique of Carver’s performance here, where, if ABC/NCB/CBS are correct in their reporting (that the body was found with only handguns and the rifle had been left in the car), then what precisely are we to make of Carver’s contention that they were all shot with the Bushmaster?
What is more likely: that ABC/NBC/CBS, who confirmed their report with federal and state officials, are wrong about the body having been found with only handguns in the vicinity?…
Or that Carver–who did not even know how many of the dead were boys and how many were girls–is wrong about them all having been shot with the Bushmaster?
Bear in mind, if multiple shooters had been involved, then both reports could be true, where Adam Lanza’s body was places with hand guns in the vicinity and other shooters slaughtered the children, if, indeed, any children were actually murdered at all. There is even a report that Carver himself has admitted that it was “a hoax”.
More Fraud and Fakery
United Way forgot to check the schedule before they had set up the fraudulent “fleece America” site to get money from bleeding hearts who wanted to donate to the HOAX fund to pay these crisis actors.
Yep, on 11 December this DONATION SITE was set up by United Way. That’s mighty clairvoyant thinking there to be so prepped.
The brochure for telling families how to talk to their kids just happened to be RELEASED THAT DAY, when anyone in the brochure printing business knows that the laying up of a brochure and the production takes days not just an hour or two. Yet it was done on December 14th.
There is evidence it was produced on 12 December, two days before the shooting, meaning again, THIS WAS A HOAX! An act of PRE-MEDITATED HIGH TREASON.
We have photoshopped photos by FEMA presumably or the FBI, showing Robbie Parker’s fake family all sitting in a CHRISTMAS CARD scene that do not make sense (above).
Ironically, the same dress is worn by the vicSIM girl–although some maintain that she is actually her sister–when being photographed with President Obama, but we are told that dresses can be used by any child.
By the way, all of them are smiling, possibly because that photo was taken during the DRILL months before not on the day alleged. This, in turn, raises serious questions as to whether PRESIDENT OBAMA HIMSELF is complicit in this case of apparent HOAX AND HIGH TREASON.
Add to the fact that two weeks before this, Eric Holder, the U.S. Attorney General, met with the Lt. Governor and Governor of the State of Connecticut and during a press conference held by the Governor with his Lt. Governor there, they admit this freely, implicating themselves in this HOAX and LIE perpetrated on the American Public on not just this occasion, but in Tucson and Aurora.
What we have is a series of HOAXES all staged by the dept of JUST US here, which were interspersed across various partsof the Continental U.S. to do two things:
a.) grab guns and end the 2nd amendment.
b.) demonize all independent 9/11 investigators and others who would so decry these as being ELABORATELY STAGED HOAXES USING CRISIS ACTORS!
A Multiplicity of Hoax Shootings
The evidence bears this out that not only was the government involved, but by virtue of CNN airing the DRILL VIDEO months before as LIVE VIDEO they too are implicated, as is Anderson Cooper and many others in MSM, including a british scumball gun grabber named Piers Morgan who demands we disarm.
We have proven these HOAXES were purposely staged by FEMA and CRISIS ACTORS strictly, and that no people were truly harmed or killed in any of these events.
We know that Gabrele Giffords and a Federal Judge were not shot in Tucson without blood being everywhere, yet not one EMS person on the scene there had any blood.
You can pretty much rest assured that nobody died in Aurora either, that CRISIS ACTORS were again used, and per the smirking FBI agent and TREASONOUS SNAKE named James Yacone, behind the Chief of Police, this too was a HOAX and LIE.
We can prove the long rifle alleged by Wayne ‘fake coroner’ Carver in Newtown was found in the trunk of a black Honda that evening, and we can prove that rifle rounds not shotgun shells were ejected onto the pavement behind that car by someone NOT IN LAW ENFORCEMENT, by the manhandling and GRANDSTANDING OF THE WEAPON that night on the helicopter video we all have.
We can prove that per their own admission now that authorities have now morphed this weapon into an exotic and odd foreign made SHOTGUN when it clearly was not a shotgun.
It’s not relevant any longer whether it was a shotgun, a zip gun, or a b.b. gun, because the likes of Lt. Paul Vance of the CT. STATE PATROL, has now said that both long guns that were taken to the crime scene had been locked in a vehicle and outside of the reach of a shooter who died the day before, and could not have used them because they were found in the vehicle long after any rational person could so justify this cordoned off with crime scene tape, search hours and hours later in darkness. That was not by accident.
It was on purpose, filmed from the roof of the school using just enough flood lighting to make positive identification of the weapon almost impossible other than it was NOT A PISTOL.
In summary regarding the weapons in the car, THEY COULD NOT HAVE BEEN USED BY ANY SHOOTER THAT DAY, so they are now excluded forever!
Add to this the incredible threat by the CT STATE PATROL to charge and incarcerate ANY INDIVIDUALS DEBUNKING THESE HOAXES, and a lying snake POTUS without tears on his face, decrying we need to give up our SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS AS CITIZENS.
CT State Emergency System Hijacked
We can now prove that the entire CT State emergency communications system was ‘hijacked’ and ‘unplugged’ on December 14th., 2012, per an elaborate frequency change plan implemented merely 5 hours in advance on that morning, effectively supplanting and replacing normal police and EMS with FEMA / DHS ‘shadow’ command center personnel, where it turns out that they (the HOAX perpetrators from FEMA) made one critical mistake that they hoped nobody would catch. But last night, I caught it.
During the listening to the plethora of radio scanner audio recordings, I finally had a chance to hear the infamous plate run of the black Honda. I had for weeks taken for granted that others who heard it would have validated it as either fakery or reality but nobody caught the fact it is in it’s entirely, FAKE.
Police and Dispatch, nation wide, use a very time honored ALPHA PHONETIC System to enunciate alpha numeric data between the officers and the dispatchers. It is different from what military use, and it is so ingrained and dyed into the wool of real law enforcement and dispatchers for a good reason.
Any error can cost not only the officer his life, but potentially cost others their lives either by sending people to the wrong address or by implicating the wrong person in a crime, or missing a criminal during a CODE TEN run on the person through the system.
During the course of the running of the black Honda, this ALPHA PHONETIC police and dispatch protocol was totally out the window and not used at all. I listened to that audio last night in utter disbelief.
Between the alleged officers running the plate through dispatch, and the dispatcher herself, the data was read to and fro like any normal citizen would read data on a radio. They did not use the ALPHA PHONETIC protocol that is ingrained in both the officer and the dispatcher.
While other questions have been raised about these communications, this one is decisive:
Suppose for the record that had the officer deviated and read data to dispatch improperly, the dispatcher would have read it back with PROPER PHONETIC enunciation to the officer under any and all circumstances, not as a correction of the officer but to make it clear that to all on the circuit who are listening that they pay attention to the data readback, as many backup units in the vicinity may need that data to properly B.O.L.O. find a car they need to intercept. B.O.L.O. is Be On Look Out, by the way.
On the 14th of December, we know that 5 hours earlier, a comprehensive frequency change plan for all emergency communications in Connecticut, State Wide, got implemented. It wasn’t just a coincidence.
As it would now appear, a ‘shadow’ dispatch center went into operation on December 14th., presumably run entirely by FEMA and DHS or MOSSAD possibly, because they used non trained, non familiar with the ALPHA PHONETIC protocols police use, to do radio transmissions that day, which now clearly must have all been staged for us like the rest of this hoax was.
This is a strong allegation to make, but I make it now based on the way this information was transferred by clearly non law enforcement personnel, intentionally in a way that was interceptable and recorded by someone, if not wholly fed to us via calibrated feed or leak by the perpetrators of the hoax.
It is pretty clear that the entire emergency radio apparatus of Connecticut was unplugged altogether on December 14th., with possibly a back channel to allow non HOAX or NON DRILL emergency information to be handled by real law enforcers and real dispatchers.
As is now certified by this analysis, clearly there is evidence of circumvention just as NEADS was circumvented and not allowed to have live radar feeds from radar facilities on 9/11, but had data that was 26 seconds OLD, for good reason:
that being to cull out and remove real targets that the perpetrators needed never to be intercepted, while loading the system up with pre recorded exercise radar tracks and artificial targets to confuse not just military but CIVILIAN ATC personnel on 9/11.
So back to this HOAX in Newtown CT, for example, when a police officer calls in ‘A B C D’ to dispatch, he or she phonetically enunciates it as; “ADAM BAKER CHARLES DAVID” over the radio, and the dispatcher will read back the same PHONETIC information for clarification.
On December 14th., the plate data was not read to and from dispatch like this at all. The way the officer and dispatcher read this data was; ‘A B C D’ AYE BEE CEE DEE’ and that is clearly not correct and NEVER EVER DONE as it is too easy to mistakenly misunderstand transmissions coded thusly.
This is now a record, not conjecture, not speculation, but stuff everyone has in their possession that was disseminated and NOT CHALLENGED by Lt. Vance of the CT STATE PATROL or other law enforcers now for several weeks, had it been not their transmissions.
Why is this such an important issue? Dispatchers and Law Enforcement personnel are trained and trained and trained and trained. Even in high stress environments which they train in simulations, by the way, they are ingrained to not deviate from these procedures.
So it is important to point out here that the people on the radio in Connecticut that day clearly were not law enforcement or dispatcher personnel. They could not have been. They so grossly deviated in the data reads over the radio that no law enforcer or dispatcher would so deviate like that. Absolutely never.
Much of these recordings clearly are indicative of non law enforcement personnel on radios. Persons without intensive training as to how to report information to dispatchers and other officers. Other people familiar with the normal POLICE alpha phonetic system also concur with my evaluation that these are not police nor are they trained dispatch personnel on these recordings.
FEMA or DHS Personnel in Charge
They are FEMA personnel most likely or DHS personnel, or maybe even MOSSAD agents, given the dynamic of how much control they have here in the U.S., in direct collusion with this government.
They provide intelligence to the acting director of DHS, Janet Napoletano, and they are integral to most of the fusion centers in the U.S., effectively legitimizing a foreign secret police force on U.S. soil who’s sole purpose is to spy on and harass American Citizens, who, for many reasons, do not like what is going on in this hijacked by Israeli spies, nation.
The 33 frequency change modification to the communications plan for Connecticut that went into effect 5 hours before the staged hoax went down, happened for a reason.
The screen shots of these 33 frequency changes, which were made just hours before the event, and of the ‘dummy’ non-named frequency allocation to one “phantom” that would not normally be blanked out like this in any normal frequency allocation chart, are published here.
To whom does it belong? DHS? FEMA? FBI? This is the de-facto smoking gun that virtually all scanner radio traffic heard on police scanners or whomever provided these to us, are STAGED.
Here is a scan of the Connecticut Statewide Emergency Radio Network at the time:
For comparison, here’s a parallel scan for the Fairview County Simulcast, which under normal conditions it would resemble:
Plus there was an addition that day of one more communications site for which the data is mysteriously absence altogether:
It would not be unreasonable to conclude that Site 1-22 was the DHS or FEMA master control site, which was monitoring every communication related to Sandy Hook that day and make sure that no information that would blow its cover got out.
A Series of Escalating-in-Violence Staged Events

We now have more proof that virtually all of this was a staged, canned, very treasonous HOAX run by the highest levels of Connecticut STATE PATROL, and FEMA and DHS who had total oversight over all of this in the nation on December 14th. 2012.
These sweeping frequency allocations changes make perfect sense. Not unlike on September 11th, where all of the ATC to AA-11 radio broadcasts were found to be fraudulent and scripted and NON REALITY. This was no different.
And now we have one more PROOF POSITIVE that this was a huge massive HOAX perpetrated on everyone on December 14th, just like Sept 11th was, and Tucson was, and Aurora was, and perhaps even the Sikh Temple shooting in Wisconsin and the Clackamas Mall shooting were.
ALL FEMA HOAXES run by this corrupt illegitimacy known as the Federal Government and their eager for the money (PROJECT LONGEVITY CASH COW BRIBE RECIPIENTS).
Something is desperately wrong when so many Americans cannot distinguish between the government’s FABRICATED CRISIS ACTOR fantasy and reality.
We have the goods. We can prove these are HOAXES staged to grab guns.
I ask you to INDICT THESE TRAITORS AND TREASONOUS LIARS, including the Attorney General, the FBI, and the President of the United States as well as Clarence W. Dupnik, the Chief of Police of Aurora, Colorado, and the Lt. Governor and the Governor of Connecticut, for taking part in these HOAXES.
Now is the time for every single American to come to grips with the hard reality, which is that our own Federal Government has become an INTERNAL ENEMY, which has been hijacked by powerful interests who will cover up any degree of mass murder, treason, and looting that is committed here, especially by Zionists who are promoting the interests of Israel and not those of the United States.
Each and every one of us has a choice, which is simple: RESIST!
Dennis Cimino – Jim Fetzer – February 1, 2012 – posted at VeteransToday
Dennis Cimino, who has extensive engineering and support experience with military electronics, predominantly US Navy Combat Systems, was the Navy’s top EMI troubleshooter before he went to work for Raytheon in the 1980s.
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

Obama ‘stonewall’ perils national security, Grassley charges

Obama ‘stonewall’ perils national security, Grassley charges

By   /   December 12, 2013  /   No Comments
AT RISK: Sen. Charles Grassley says he's getting no answers from DHS nominee Jeh Johnson.
AT RISK: Sen. Charles Grassley says he’s getting no answers from DHS nominee Jeh Johnson.
By Kenric Ward |
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee charges that the Obama administration’s handling of EB-5 investor-visas “poses a gigantic risk” to national security.
U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, says Jeh Johnson, nominated to lead the Department of Homeland Security, has failed to address dozens of allegations raised by whistleblowers at the troubled agency.
President Obama promised that this would be the most transparent administration in history.  Yet, getting answers from this president or his administration on legitimate congressional oversight has been like pulling teeth,” Grassley said Wednesday.
“They have stonewalled Congress at every turn,” he sad in a statement.
Among the chief concerns is the conduct of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the DHS agency that administers the EB-5 program.
In January 2012, the DHS Inspector General released a report criticizing USCIS for pressuring its employees to rubberstamp applications for immigration benefits. The report found that nearly 25 percent of USCIS officers surveyed said supervisors had pressured them to approve applications that should have been denied.
“We want to know if (Johnson) will take measures to better screen applicants and do away with the ‘get to yes’ philosophy,” said Grassley, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, which has primary responsibility over immigration matters.
“That ‘get to yes’ philosophy is a gigantic risk to our national security. Just look at the EB-5 program, which allows foreign nationals to obtain a green card if they invest in the United States. We asked about whether he’d make it a priority to improve the program.”
Another Inspector General investigation is ongoing into the USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas’ handling of EB-5 applicants, foreign investors who pay up to $1 million in exchange for receiving a U.S. green card.
As the EB-5 program has grown under the Obama administration, whistleblowers in USCIS have complained, anonymously, that their agency is ill-equipped to handle the caseload, and under political pressure to rubber-stamp approvals.
Mayorkas, Obama’s nominee to be deputy secretary of DHS, says USCIS has added financial specialists to better analyze applications. But he has also come under fire for insinuating himself into the adjudication process.
According to the Senate Homeland Security Committee, some 15,000 EB-5 applicants have been approved to date, with $3.3 billion received from those foreign investors.
But USCIS will not say — and has not determined — how many U.S. jobs have been created from those investments.
The General Accounting Office says there are no “reliable metrics” to verify the 10-jobs-per-investment formula required under EB-5. Further, the GAO did not rule out the possibility that “suspected terrorists are using the program” to launder money and gain green cards.
Nonetheless, Mayorkas, a former U.S. attorney, was approved by all nine Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security Committee Wednesday morning.
All seven Republicans on the panel voted “present,” saying they needed the IG results before proceeding.
Committee Democrats, and even Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, of Wisconsin, questioned the integrity of the Inspector General’s operation.
Amid reports that just a small handful of the IG’s 600-member staff has been tasked to investigate Mayorkas, the Wisconsin senator suggested there may be “corruption” in the IG office.
Watchdog reported last month that Inspector General Charles Edwards faces allegations of misconduct, including misusing official resources and exerting undue influence.
Mayorkas’ nomination — like Jeh Johnson’s — now awaits final confirmation in the Senate.
“We asked (Johnson) if he believed whistleblowers who know of problems with matters of national security should be prevented from bringing that information to Congress,” Grassley said of a letter he and other Judiciary members addressed to the nominee a month ago.
“We asked if he would commit to ensuring that every whistleblower is treated fairly and that those who retaliate against whistleblowers are held accountable.”
With no answers forthcoming, Grassley said doubts that the nominations of either Johnson or Mayorkas can be derailed, or even delayed.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid invoked the so-called “nuclear option” last month, blowing up the Senate’s time-honored filibuster rule that requires 60 votes to halt floor debates. Now, a simple majority of 51 votes is sufficient to push through judicial and administrative nominees. Democrats hold 55 of 100 seats.
“Thanks to the rule change done unilaterally by Majority Leader Reid, there will no longer be a proper vetting of Executive Branch nominees. The rule change essentially takes away the Senate’s constitutional role of advise and consent, thereby allowing nominees to ignore Congress on issues of extreme importance, such as immigration,” Grassley noted.
Kenric Ward is chief of Watchdog’s Virginia Bureau. Contact him at or at (571) 319-9824. @Kenricward

EB-5 Immigrant Investor

Visa Description

USCIS administers the Immigrant Investor Program, also known as “EB-5,” created by Congress in 1990 to stimulate the U.S. economy through job creation and capital investment by foreign investors. Under a pilot immigration program first enacted in 1992 and regularly reauthorized since, certain EB-5 visas also are set aside for investors in Regional Centers designated by USCIS based on proposals for promoting economic growth.
All EB-5 investors must invest in a new commercial enterprise, which is a commercial enterprise:
  • Established after Nov. 29, 1990, or
  • Established on or before Nov. 29, 1990, that is:
    1. Purchased and the existing business is restructured or reorganized in such a way that a new commercial enterprise results, or
    2. Expanded through the investment so that a 40-percent increase in the net worth or number of employees occurs
Commercial enterprise means any for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of lawful business including, but not limited to:
  • A sole proprietorship
  • Partnership (whether limited or general)
  • Holding company
  • Joint venture
  • Corporation
  • Business trust or other entity, which may be publicly or privately owned
This definition includes a commercial enterprise consisting of a holding company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, provided that each such subsidiary is engaged in a for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of a lawful business.
Note: This definition does not include noncommercial activity such as owning and operating a personal residence.

Job Creation Requirements

  • Create or preserve at least 10 full-time jobs for qualifying U.S. workers within two years (or under certain circumstances, within a reasonable time after the two-year period) of the immigrant investor’s admission to the United States as a Conditional Permanent Resident.
  • Create or preserve either direct or indirect jobs:
    • Direct jobs are actual identifiable jobs for qualified employees located within the commercial enterprise into which the EB-5 investor has directly invested his or her capital.
    • Indirect jobs are those jobs shown to have been created collaterally or as a result of capital invested in a commercial enterprise affiliated with a regional center by an EB-5 investor. A foreign investor may only use the indirect job calculation if affiliated with a regional center.
Note: Investors may only be credited with preserving jobs in a troubled business.
A troubled business is an enterprise that has been in existence for at least two years and has incurred a net loss during the 12- or 24-month period prior to the priority date on the immigrant investor’s Form I-526. The loss for this period must be at least 20 percent of the troubled business’ net worth prior to the loss. For purposes of determining whether the troubled business has been in existence for two years, successors in interest to the troubled business will be deemed to have been in existence for the same period of time as the business they succeeded.
A qualified employee is a U.S. citizen, permanent resident or other immigrant authorized to work in the United States. The individual may be a conditional resident, an asylee, a refugee, or a person residing in the United States under suspension of deportation. This definition does not include the immigrant investor; his or her spouse, sons, or daughters; or any foreign national in any nonimmigrant status (such as an H-1B visa holder) or who is not authorized to work in the United States.
Full-time employment means employment of a qualifying employee by the new commercial enterprise in a position that requires a minimum of 35 working hours per week. In the case of the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program, "full-time employment" also means employment of a qualifying employee in a position that has been created indirectly from investments associated with the Pilot Program.
A job-sharing arrangement whereby two or more qualifying employees share a full-time position will count as full-time employment provided the hourly requirement per week is met. This definition does not include combinations of part-time positions or full-time equivalents even if, when combined, the positions meet the hourly requirement per week. The position must be permanent, full-time and constant. The two qualified employees sharing the job must be permanent and share the associated benefits normally related to any permanent, full-time position, including payment of both workman’s compensation and unemployment premiums for the position by the employer.

Capital Investment Requirements

Capital means cash, equipment, inventory, other tangible property, cash equivalents and indebtedness secured by assets owned by the alien entrepreneur, provided that the alien entrepreneur is personally and primarily liable and that the assets of the new commercial enterprise upon which the petition is based are not used to secure any of the indebtedness. All capital shall be valued at fair-market value in United States dollars. Assets acquired, directly or indirectly, by unlawful means (such as criminal activities) shall not be considered capital for the purposes of section 203(b)(5) of the Act.
Note: Investment capital cannot be borrowed.
Required minimum investments are:
  • General. The minimum qualifying investment in the United States is $1 million.
  • Targeted Employment Area (High Unemployment or Rural Area). The minimum qualifying investment either within a high-unemployment area or rural area in the United States is $500,000.
A targeted employment area is an area that, at the time of investment, is a rural area or an area experiencing unemployment of at least 150 percent of the national average rate.
A rural area is any area outside a metropolitan statistical area (as designated by the Office of Management and Budget) or outside the boundary of any city or town having a population of 20,000 or more according to the decennial census.

Gov’t memo: Iran agents infiltrating U.S. through visa-investor program

Gov’t memo: Iran agents infiltrating U.S. through visa-investor program

Department of Homeland SecurityAmerica’s EB-5 visa-investor program has opened a gateway for Iranian operatives to infiltrate the country, a government memo says.
Citing a report by the Homeland Security Investigations division, U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley said EB-5 is vulnerable to the “export of sensitive technology and economic espionage,” as well as “investment fraud” and money laundering.
In a slap at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which administers the multibillion-dollar program, the HSI memo concludes that the EB-5 regional center system “has significant flaws and should be abandoned.”
Some 400 privately run U.S. regional centers collect investments of up to $1 million from foreign nationals for American-based businesses. In exchange, the investors become eligible to receive U.S. green cards for themselves and their families.
One of the program’s few critics on Capitol Hill, Grassley, R-Iowa, quoted the HSI memo as saying EB-5 “may be abused by Iranian operatives to infiltrate the United States.
“Two of the operatives allegedly ‘facilitate terrorism’ and are involved in an illegal procurement network that exports items to Iran for use by ‘secret’ Iranian government agencies.”
According to the memo, one of the operatives acted as a representative for an Iranian front company allegedly run by an individual associated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard.
HSI’s undated report — labeled “law enforcement sensitive” — lists several areas of EB-5 vulnerability:
  • Export of sensitive technology through economic espionage.
  • Investment fraud by regional centers and/or investors.
  • Illicit financing via money laundering.
The memo said such vulnerabilities are exploited “by information gaps on the alien beneficiaries of the EB-5 program.”
“Unlike most other permanent resident visa classifications, EB-5 beneficiaries do not need to establish a significant and verifiable background for program eligibility.”
USCIS Director Alejando Mayorkas demonstrated his apparent lack of knowledge in July when he testified before the Senate Homeland Security Committee that he did not know, and could not estimate, the number of regional centers in operation.
The HSI warnings prompted Grassley — the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees immigration issues — to inquire about “the Iranian case.”
His request was sent to John Sandweg, acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, on Thursday.
USCIS deferred comment to ICE and DHS, neither of which responded to my inquiry.
Grassley’s assault on the immigration bureaucracy was his second in two days. On Wednesday, the senator blasted what he called the Obama administration’s “stonewall” surrounding DHS and called the EB-5 program a “gigantic risk” to national security.
Jeh Johnson, President Obama’s nominee to be secretary of the agency, and Mayorkas, tabbed as deputy secretary, are awaiting Senate confirmation.
Read more by Kenric Ward at

Call Benghazi what it is – Murder

Reprinted with full permission of Shoebat Foundation
I am a retired Los Angeles police captain and had a detective division of 100 plus detectives working for me. Fifteen of those detectives were homicide unit specialists and at the time we investigated more than 100 homicides per year. When it comes to investigating murder cases, I’ve had some experience.
During my career I was deemed a subject matter expert in criminal law, evidence, and procedure, and in U.S. Constitutional law, and testified as such under California administrative law.
During my career, and since retirement, I studied the Russian Bolsheviks as they existed from 1898 through 1960. Using my 50 years of knowledge gained, I wrote a book which was published in 2010 entitled Executive Order 1 and subtitled And The Bolshevik Papers. In the book, I identify a nearly exact replication of Russian Bolsheviks coming to power by the Obama group gaining the power to take over America…for a Bolshevik regime.
I am not a subscriber to the beloved American militia, and others, rising to oppose the Obamaites in a grand re-claiming of America, and I regularly, in writing and in presentations, indicate so. I believe that the decision is not ours as to the fate of America, but solely the American Bolsheviks. However, that is not the point here.
I am not a subscriber to the beloved American militia, and others, rising to oppose the Obamaites in a grand re-claiming of America, and I regularly, in writing and in presentations, indicate so. I believe that the decision is not ours as to the fate of America, but solely the American Bolsheviks. However, that is not the point here.
I want to completely change the direction of the national Benghazi debate. What I am offering is clearly already known to both Democrats and Republicans but the public is clearly ignorant. That the Republicans restrict their inquiries and bashing to a cover-up in Benghazi (and the Democrats are happy to debate in that arena ad nauseum) is a clear indication as to their lack of seriousness and just plain old nasty politicking. They is only one pod occupied by two peas.
I must admit that I don’t have all the facts about Benghazi but I believe I have enough, and so will set up a hypothetical. A hypothetical is a story, to keep it simple, and if I prove my hypothetical and show the real circumstances are the same as the hypothetical, then I prove my point.
There are some legal points and some interesting jurisdictional considerations but I don’t like the legal climate and don’t play their games. My consideration is tactical and not legal. I don’t care about conviction whether criminal or Senate. I believe the fight for America is much bigger. I want to begin a debate in the patriot arena and force it to the political debate…to make the murders in Benghazi the issue, and not some nebulous cover-up flip flop no one wins (free America loses).
The legal mind loves to argue black is white or white is black, plea bargain, or re-define the Second Amendment. Let them go into a dark room and argue all they want. The arena I propose is the arena of public opinion made up of all legal and in good-standing patriotic citizens of free America.
I don’t want to make this a legal treatise but this is pretty simple and straight forward, so here goes.
Below are definitions of murder:
California Penal Code Section 187 (a), “Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought.”
At common law, murder was defined as killing another human being with malice aforethought.
The Model Penal Code defines murder as, “Killing another human being in circumstances showing extreme recklessness.”
Malice aforethought:
Malice aforethought is defined as a predetermination to commit an act without legal justification or excuse, a malicious design to injure, an intent, at the time of a killing, willfully to take the life of a human being, or an intent willfully to act in callous and wanton disregard of the consequences to human life; but malice aforethought does not necessarily imply any ill will, spite or hatred towards the individual killed.
Persons deemed to commit a crime of murder (principals):
One is a principal or directly guilty of a crime as the California Penal Code Section 31, in part, states, “All persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether it be felony or misdemeanor, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, or aid and abet in its commission, or, not being present, have advised and encouraged its commission…or who, by fraud, contrivance, or force…or who, by threats, menaces, command, or coercion, compel another to commit any crime, are principals in any crime so committed.”
In criminal law, it is necessary to distinguish between the accessory and the principal. The principal is the person who is responsible for a particular crime. Under most legal jurisdictions, the person or persons charged with aiding and abetting or accessory are not directly involved with the crime that is committed. They are usually not present when the crime occurred. If two or more people are directly responsible, they can be charged as joint principals. The test used in order to distinguish a principal from an accessory is whether the defendant independently contributed to the causing of the crime, rather than merely giving generalized and/or limited help and encouragement.
There are three elements to most aiding and abetting charges against an individual. The first is that another person committed the crime. Second, the individual being charged had knowledge of the crime or the principals’ intent. Third, the individual provided some form of assistance to the principal.
An understanding of these concepts and their application to the events surrounding the Benghazi murders are fully within the clear understanding of a lay person relative to the legal concepts necessary here. But there is one more very important factor, and that is to recognize that it was not necessary for Obama and his minions to have conspired to kill the four American victims. Obama and others are guilty of murder because they had knowledge of the crime and the attackers’ intent. They watched the murderers attack and their intent was obvious – to murder Americans.
The Obama group gave aid to the Libyan terrorists (militia?) by stopping aid to our people while they were still alive (at least some died only later) and under siege, three times no less, thus enabling the murderers in Benghazi to complete the killings and to escape. This was assistance to the terrorists which enabled them to continue their attack for several hours, and to murder more.
Obama knows that the attackers committed murder. Two week later, on Sept. 25, Obama spoke before the United Nations. In his speech, dedicated to our murdered ambassador, he intentionally continued to lie, blaming the inflamed crowd / video narrative while discussing the attack carried out by people he identified as “killers.” The video lie is not the main issue but does have significance relative to the murder charge. His acknowledgement of “killers” rather than the crowd violence has significance.
During this same speech Obama stated, “There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents”. He clearly recognized that those murdered were not in a “combat condition” but rather innocent persons trying to defend themselves from a planned, premeditated, reckless and ruthless multiple murder, an ensuing cover-up of American involvement, and assistance for their fellow Libyan murderers to escape identification and capture.
So much more could be put in here of a corroborative nature but there is already abundant evidence here to indict for murder. But my purpose is to initiate the real debate of open, identifiable, and observable evidence of the Obama administration members, including right up to the White House, as principals in murdering U.S. citizens who were in the line of duty, acting to defend free America at the time of the murders.
The Benghazi killings of our people are not political events of who lied about what. They are about the White House, the State Department, and the Pentagon, all principals in the premeditated murder of four Americans who were defending our country and trying to protect themselves and others.
Damn Obama and his evil minions.
Please send this to all, which means emails to other patriots, to politicians, to the media so we can openly accuse with irrefutable evidence, the U.S. government of murdering its own people.
Talking point manipulation and who called the attackers terrorists and when, won’t fly to stop this administration.
Murder accusations will, if done right.


The Case to Impeach!

Tags: 187, Angeles, Benghazi, Bolsheviks, California, Code, Los, Obamaites, Penal, R

Did the White House lie to cover up another American left behind on the battlefield?

Did the White House lie to cover up another American left behind on the battlefield? [VIDEO]



Watch this video: Administration calls Washington Post 'irresponsible' for publishing contrary evidence 

Grae Stafford
WASHINGTON — The White House refused to answer questions about the explosive revelation that Robert “Bob” Levinson, a retired federal agent and America’s longest-held hostage, was in fact a CIA spy. Despite the CIA admitting being “responsible for Levinson,” the White House flatly rejected the notion that he had ever worked for the U.S. government.
Speaking at the White House press briefing on Friday, Jay Carney refuted the claim.
“Bob Levinson was not a U.S. government employee when he went missing in Iran,” Carney said. “As there is an ongoing investigation into his disappearance, I am not going to comment further on what he may or may not have been doing in Iran. I’m not going to fact check every allegation made in the story you reference, a story we believe it was highly irresponsible to publish and which we strongly urged the outlet not to publish, out of concerns for Mr. Levinson’s safety.”
Carney was also questioned by ABC’s Jon Karl about statements made regarding Levinson.
KARL: Seventeen days ago, you issued a statement saying Robert Levinson went missing during a business trip to Kish Island, Iran. When you talked about it just now, you simply said when he went to Kish Island, Iran. I’m wondering, is that statement from 17 days ago, that he went missing during a business trip on Kish Island, Iran, is that still operative, or is that no longer…
CARNEY: Look, I — I mean, I’m simply saying that he is not a U.S. government employee. This is in reaction to a story that was published today. I mean, I’m not adjusting what was said in the past. I’m making clear in response to this story that that is what we can say. We cannot say more for some of the reasons that I just described in answering Julie’s question.
KARL: But is this statement, then, just to clarify…
CARNEY: “Yeah, I’m not — I’m not — I’m not changing or altering what was said in the past. But in response to stories today, I’m making clear that he was not a U.S. government employee when he went missing in Iran.
KARL: This is a philosophical question on this: If by putting out a statement that isn’t exactly accurate or is misleading, you could save somebody’s life or, you know, hasten his return, would that be justified? Would that be something you’d be willing to do from the podium?
CARNEY: I’m not going to speculate about that. We provide the information that we can, that’s accurate, John. And, you know, we’re talking about a matter that’s under investigation. We’re talking about an individual’s disappearance and his safety. So, you know, I just can’t describe further what he was doing. That’s under investigation. But I can tell you he was not a U.S. government employee.
What happened after Levinson suddenly vanished? >> 

Levinson was a covert operative for the CIA, according to The Washington Post. After Levinson vanished  while traveling to the the Iranian island of Kish, CIA officials insisted that Levinson did not have ties to the agency and went to Iran for unrelated reasons.
But further investigations conducted by The Associated Press and The Washington Post uncovered emails and documentation that intimated that Levinson had not been on a business trip to Iran, but had in fact traveled to Iran “at the direction of certain CIA analysts who had no authority to run operations overseas.”
The CIA paid Levinson’s wife $2.5 million and renewed his contract for another $120,000.
The CIA later disciplined 10 rogue staff members, including three long-serving analysts, who were “forced out of their jobs.” New practices were then implemented to prevent unauthorized covert actions to be carried out by contractors who had relationships with “subject matter experts.”
Levinson was last heard from in a proof-of-life video sent to his family in 2010.
“I have been held here for three and a half years… I am not in good health,” a shackled Levinson said in the video.

A look at Agenda 21 in the United States

A look at Agenda 21 in the United States

| December 8, 2012 | 0 Comments

On June 9, 2011, an Executive Order established the White House Rural Council with 25 executive branch departments including Defense, Justice, Homeland Security, National Drug Control, Environmental Quality, Labor, Commerce, Interior, EPA, Housing, Health, Education to name just a few.
The order covers 16% of the American population who lives in rural counties because they “supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. ”

File:Barack Obama signs Executive Order.jpg

Executive Order 13575 of June 9, 2011
Establishment of the White House Rural Council
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America and in order to enhance Federal engagement with rural communities, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy.
Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands. To enhance the Federal Government’s efforts to address the needs of rural America, this order establishes a council to better coordinate Federal programs and maximize the impact of Federal investment to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in our rural communities.
Sec. 2. Establishment.
There is established a White House Rural Council (Council).
Sec. 3. Membership.
The Secretary of Agriculture shall serve as the Chair of the Council, which shall also include the heads of the following executive branch departments, agencies, and offices:
the Department of the Treasury;
the Department of Defense;
the Department of Justice;
the Department of the Interior;
the Department of Commerce;
the Department of Labor;
the Department of Health and Human Services;
the Department of Housing and Urban Development;
the Department of Transportation;
the Department of Energy;
the Department of Education;
the Department of Veterans Affairs;
the Department of Homeland Security;
the Environmental Protection Agency;
the Federal Communications Commission;
the Office of Management and Budget;
the Office of Science and Technology Policy;
the Office of National Drug Control Policy;
the Council of Economic Advisers;
the Domestic Policy Council;
the National Economic Council;
the Small Business Administration;
the Council on Environmental Quality;
the White House Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs;
the White House Office of Cabinet Affairs; and such other executive branch departments, agencies, and offices as the President or the Secretary of Agriculture may, from time to time, designate.
A member of the Council may designate, to perform the Council functions of the member, a senior-level official who is part of the member’s department, agency, or office, and who is a full-time officer or employee of the Federal Government.
The Department of Agriculture shall provide funding and administrative support for the Council to the extent permitted by law and within existing appropriations.
The Council shall coordinate its policy development through the Domestic Policy Council and the National Economic Council.

Sec. 4. Mission and Function of the Council
The Council shall work across executive departments, agencies, and offices to coordinate development of policy recommendations to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in rural America, and shall coordinate my Administration’s engagement with rural communities. The Council shall:
make recommendations to the President, through the Director of the Domestic Policy Council and the Director of the National Economic Council, on streamlining and leveraging Federal investments in rural areas, where appropriate, to increase the impact of Federal dollars and create economic opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America;
coordinate and increase the effectiveness of Federal engagement with rural stakeholders, including agricultural organizations, small businesses, education and training institutions, health-care providers, telecommunications services providers, research and land grant institutions, law enforcement, State, local, and tribal governments, and nongovernmental organizations regarding the needs of rural America;
coordinate Federal efforts directed toward the growth and development of geographic regions that encompass both urban and rural areas; and
identify and facilitate rural economic opportunities associated with energy development, outdoor recreation, and other conservation related activities.

Sec. 5. General Provisions.
The heads of executive departments and agencies shall assist and provide information to the Council, consistent with applicable law, as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the Council. Each executive department and agency shall bear its own expense for participating in the Council.
Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

File:America Farm - - 625217.jpg
Image credit: Will Lovell
A recent article in Washington Post appeared with the innocuous title, “What we need: Smarter growth plans.” The author is Roger K. Lewis, a practicing architect and professor emeritus at the University of Maryland. Who can possibly object to “smarter growth plans?” Except that “smart growth plans” is the euphemism used by the United Nations for its Agenda 21, a direct assault on private property rights and American sovereignty.
Roger K. Lewis suggests that “smart growth” was designed by market forces driven by “green building.” He makes no mention of Agenda 21 and ICLEI objectives and intrusion into our society since the early 1970s or the agreement signed in 1992 that went under the radar of the American people’s understanding of the complex negative ramifications for our economy and our liberties.
I have not met Americans who think, “sprawl-producing planning, zoning and mortgage templates are obsolete” as the author claims. Would Americans willingly give up their land and homes with or without compensation in exchange for a move to a densely populated high-rise, with no parking garages, no access to cars, like rats fenced in a grey concrete maze?
Communist “social engineering” confiscated land and homes for agriculture. People were forced to move into many-storied, tiny cinder block apartments without any compensation for the land or homes bulldozed. They were forced to commute by bicycles or public transit.
Lewis deems subdivision developments with low-density, detached, single-family homes as outdated. He calls the areas educationally dysfunctional and unsafe. American suburbia was built, he says, on four assumptions that have lost validity today:
  1. Unlimited supply of land
  2. Inexpensive and inexhaustible supply of oil
  3. Homogenous land use
  4. The American dream to own and inhabit a mortgaged house.
I am not sure on what research Lewis based his conclusions, but we have huge domestic oil reserves if permits were issued to drill. We also have a vast land mass. Some areas have 70 or less inhabitants per square mile. Americans still want to own their own home and want to live in a homogeneous community of other homeowners. Just because power hungry bureaucrats at the United Nations have decided to “preserve” land and the environment for the future of the planet and its animals, neglecting the future of humans, does not mean Americans agree to this vision.
Much of America’s land cannot and should not be developed.” Who are you to decide for us, Mr. Lewis and why? Last time I checked we were free people who determined their own life choices.
“Dependency on oil and limitless use of cars pose daunting environmental, economic, and geopolitical problems.” Who is going to decide the limit to our car use? Is it going to be done by law, more regulations, or executive order?
A handful of environmentalists, the EPA, and the United Nation’s dictators, using faulty debunked data from the University of East Anglia or phony research are trying to separate Americans from their land use, cars, trucks, and the open-wide roads.
Lewis continues his Agenda 21 fallacy. “The traditional nuclear family—mom, dad, two to three kids and one or two pets—is now a minority of America’s households.” I am positive that this man is not describing America that I know and see every day. His statements continue, “Today a majority of households are people, young or old, living alone; couples or sets of unrelated individuals of various ethnicities, ages and tastes.”
Agenda 21 and Mr. Lewis suggest building high-rises in “designated areas within municipalities where new development and re-development is feasible and desirable.Affordable housing is a priority and so are environmental standards.
It is obvious that “smart growth plans” or Agenda 21 designed by United Nations will affect our future choices in how we live and where. EPA will be involved and will twist the arms of those who do not adopt “smart growth plans,” denying grants to states and cities and levying other penalties. By the time Americans realize the implications of Agenda 21“smart growth,they will lose their homes and lands with no compensation. At least people who lost property under Eminent Domain have been compensated.

The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) is a conglomerate of 600 national, regional, and local government associations who promote “sustainable development” and protection of the environment because of man-made global warming that does not exist.
“Sustainable development” is the United Nations effort to contain and limit economic development in developed countries and thus control population growth. It is “sustainable de-growth,” plain and simple. The focus is “low-income agriculture” and to set limits on the developed world.
United Nations and its affiliates believe that first world countries polluted significantly during their development while urging third world countries to reduce pollution thus impeding their growth. Implementation of“sustainable development” would revert our society to a pre-modern lifestyle.
ICLEI wants to keep the environment as pristine as possible through “ideal-seeking behavior.” These euphemisms are not clearly defined in terms of what or who will evaluate or set the standards for this “ideal-seeking behavior.”
Agenda 21 sets up the global infrastructure to manage, count, and control assets. It is not concerned with protecting the environment or the world’s resources. Agenda 21 wants change from old sector-centered ways of doing business to new approaches. The “desired future state” should be to pursue “economic prosperity, environmental quality, and social equity.”
“Social equity” is the new euphemism for “social justice” the Marxists in our government have been using a lot lately. Who gave them the authority and the mandate to initiate such change? I do not remember the American people being asked through a referendum whether we wanted our way of life to be fundamentally changed according to mandates set up by the United Nations. How will population growth control be achieved in order to protect the precious environment?

File:Sustainable development.svg
Image credit: Johann Dreo
There are four tiers to UN’s “sustainable development” plan:
  1. Environmental sustainability
  2. Economic sustainability
  3. Socio-political sustainability
  4. Cultural diversity.
In 2001 UNESCO, in The Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity, stated that cultural diversity is as important as biodiversity in the sense of a more satisfactory, intellectual, emotional, moral, and spiritual existence. Who is to decide the level and quality of the population’s satisfaction, intellectual, emotional, moral, and spiritual existence? Human needs must be met while preserving the environment for the future. Again, who will decide what our needs are in order to preserve the future?
In February 2011 in Nairobi, Kenya, ICLEI attended a United Nations conference as representative of the interests of local governments. “In collaboration with partners such as UN-Habitat, Cities Alliance and ICLEI, UNEP (United Nations Environmental Protection) is working to make cities more livable, better prepared for the multiple environmental challenges they are facing, as well as giving them a stronger voice in the international climate negotiations.” Last time I checked, global warming has been debunked as a hoax and UN rapidly changed its name to climate change, continuing the attempt to fleece developed countries. In addition, who decides these international climate negotiations and why? What are we negotiating? Carbon credits?
In October 2009 in Bangkok, ICLEI stated, “local governments are offering national governments our partnership in the fight against climate change.” ICLEI wants local governments to collaborate with national governments to fight against climate change, the very change that has been scientifically debunked.
Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution states clearly, “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation, …No State shall,… enter into an Agreement or Compact with another State or with a foreign power…” The counties and cities that are members of ICLEI in the U.S. through its national organization are attempting to implement foreign policy, which our Constitution forbids. What mayors and municipal governments are doing is plain unconstitutional.
“Mayors and local governments set forth the following commitments to implement sub-national, national, and international frameworks by providing resources, authority, and mandate to carry forward climate protection roles and responsibilities.”
There is no law or act of Congress to authorize the aiding and abetting of foreign policy globalism by state and local governments. We have to protect our sovereignty by banning cities and counties to be members of ICLEI, an organization that promotes United Nation’s Agenda 21/“smart growth” which is detrimental to American economic interests, liberty, and sovereignty.
“No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto law, or Law impairing the obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.” -Article 1, Section 10, The United States Constitution. That Section of the Constitution prevents membership of states, cities and counties in an organization called International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI)…
But I’ll bet many of you reading this live in a city, town, or county that belongs to ICLEI because ICLEI has more than 600 active members throughout the United States. Those members are cities, counties, and states, not individuals. Westchester County is a member of ICLEI. Think we have a problem? To see if your city, town or county is affiliated with ICLEI go here: