| ||||
Publication of the White House on Wednesday and documents not
previously disclosed relate with his handling of the attack on the U.S.
consulate in the Libyan city of Benghazi last year.
These documents came in more than one hundred pages of e-mails
exchanged between the White House and the State Department and the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) about what happened in the attack.
The documents show the details of the debate within the administration
about the attacks, and comes at a time faced when President Barack Obama is under pressure from Republicans
who accuse his government of covering up the details of the incident
after it was reported last week that the notes on the incident was
re-edited to delete a warning from the Central Intelligence Agency from
the threat of shape-Qaeda .
Observers say that the Obama administration is trying with the
publication of these pages prove its goodwill apparently, while its
political opponents accused her of trying to mitigate in her character
of "terrorist" for the attack, which killed four Americans, including
Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
These show the evolution of e-mails "language used" as provided in the start and the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and intended for use in public statements by leaders of the administration and members of Congress.
The American newspapers talked about the facts unfold in front of the
American people finally attack on Benghazi after the testimony of
officials from the U.S. State testify at a hearing, and that the
framework of attempts to detect the steps taken by the State in response
to the attack on the U.S. consulate on September 11 / September 2012.
She stated that the disclosure of these facts was delayed because the
Obama administration has focused all their attention on re-weave new
stories on the four Americans killed in the attack, in the tenth
anniversary of the attacks of September 11 / September 2001.
|
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976?Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Unless you are in this field of investigative journalism, especially covering extremely sensitive subjects and potentially dangerous subjects as well, you simply cannot understand the complexities and difficulties involved with this work that I face every day.
Friday, December 20, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment