Monday, December 2, 2013

About the real objectives of the war on Syria .. Conflict over the petro-dollar


167 595 Syria Promise
Each expert assessment of your maneuvers and Washington over Syria, and his own understanding of the objectives of these exercises. Therefore there are perceptions about the war based on Syria as far as the number of experts who write on the subject of the Syrian crisis. For example:
1) to provide the U.S. energy resources
2) create organized chaos in order to dominate the Middle East region;
3) protect the interests of American ally first, Israel;
4) the use of Syria as a "detonator" to ignite a regional war to expand later to a global war ;
5) enhanced support declining for U.S. President;
6) to enable Washington to control more effectively on China and European countries, which depend on energy resources from the Middle East;
7) the occupation of Syria in order to move towards the destruction of the enemy of the United States the largest, Iran;
8) insurance contracts of the defense industry of America and enrich the "princes of arms";
9) to move the U.S. economy is sluggish through military spending;
10) divert the attention of Americans on unemployment, poverty, and the failure of American foreign policy, and justify the actions of intelligence agencies in the control of the American people, ... etc..
in attempt to clarify the real objectives that push Washington to escalate tension with Syria about the presence of many well-informed and expert opinions, one should not take the words of Barack Obama seriously. So we'll assume here that the president has no understanding for the comprehensive plan regarding Syria. The same applies to the Pentagon and the field of American generals. In recent hearings in the U.S. Congress, he replied, General (four-star) Martin Dempsey - Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - on the question of Senator Bob Corker on the objectives sought by the campaign in the Syrian military directly frankly: "I can not answer this question, Concerning the goals that we seek to achieve. "
"peace and security" through the war
I think that we can identify three main objectives are interrelated among the objectives of the Washington hierarchy in the "Syrian project":
1) pave the road of aggression and access to Russia's borders;
2) create conditions for igniting " World War III ";
3) maintaining a petro-dollar coin.
Much has been said about Syria as an intermediary link in Washington's aggressive schemes. After Syria, Iran will be the next target of aggression. After Iran, the aggressor will be up to the southern borders of Russia.
Now we turn to the second strategic objective. I have not noticed less spark World War III, but to create conditions for stoking. The dilemma is that the United States does not need a third world war at the present time. But that may arise needed in the near future. Why?Whatever the answer seemed strange and unexpected, but it lies in the metaphysical world; since there is no purely logical answer. VLP matter is that the masters of the system, "Federal Reserve", who dictate their will on America, have a sense of religious flamed: they think they are missionaries coming of "Almashiyak" (Messiah), and expect that when it comes to this world, will ascend the throne in the Temple of Jerusalem, which not been built yet. The masters of the "Federal Reserve" need to be a regional war in the Middle East because they are, as they believe, will make it possible to rebuild the "Third Temple" in Jerusalem. Since ignite a war in one of the most volatile regions of the world could easily evolve into a world war wreak havoc all over the world. This will be the kind of chaos guarantor forcing all nations, witnessed by the same mother, a prayer to bring "peace and security" in the world. Then will come "last days", and cheering most of the people welcoming the arrival of "Almashiyak" (in the Christian vision, Antichrist), who will reveal himself as the keeper of "peace and security."
war as a means of debt cancellation
there interpret simplified to the need of the United States for World War III. This is the theoretical "financial" Detailed measure of awareness on the atheism of the ruling elites in the West. Such war to abolish the astronomical debt of the United States and the West, in addition to the banks, "Wall Street" and "London City", City of humanity as a whole. It has exceeded the sovereign debt of the United States 100% of "GDP", and the external debt of the country has exceeded 100% of the "gross domestic product". Europe suffers from crippling debt crisis several years ago, without any solution in sight. It is approaching the sovereign debt of the countries of the "euro zone" of 100% of the "gross domestic product". The external debt situation even more dangerous. In Great Britain, for example, approached the level of external debt of 500% of the "gross domestic product". This indebtedness imposed on forced alliance with Europe and Washington on military adventures. The war, he explains usurers bankers to the politicians, to "write off" all this debt. Otherwise it will be the end of not only banks, but many countries in the "golden billion".
Mechanisms "write off" the debt variety. Some creditors to disappear from the map as a result of the war. A common saying among moneylenders: "If there is no creditor, there is no religion." They can explain to others that their debts to America have been canceled to cover the expenses of Washington in "defense of democracy" on the cosmic level. It can also convert other creditors to debtors through the imposition of damages as enemies or allies of the enemies of "global democracy." In short, the "Uncle Sam" to come out of the war without any debt. This is what it is betting its allies as well, especially Great Britain. And then dreamed of Washington to enter "River of History" again as the victor in the last world war, with all privileges implied by this result. But the scenario will be the launch of World War only in the case of the inability to afford a pyramid of religion in America. At the moment, the system tries to military and U.S. banking with all his strength carry this debt and expand.
Washington need to petrodollars, not oil
, and now we move on to the third strategic objective: to maintain petrodollar system. It is well known that it was forty years ago, replacing the gold standard criterion of oil. In 1971, the United States declared the end of the convertibility of the dollar into gold. Two years later, in order to support the global demand for the U.S. dollar, which was not supported by anything at the time, was the creation of a new system: the petro-dollar. In 1973 agreement was reached between Saudi Arabia and the United States provides for the pricing of each barrel of oil purchased from Saudi Arabia in U.S. dollars. According to this new agreement, each country must be willing to buy oil from Saudi Arabia to be the first to switch its national currency to the U.S. dollar. In return for the approval of Saudi Arabia to hold oil deals exclusively in U.S. dollars, the American weapons and protection of the oil fields against the excesses of neighboring countries, including Israel. In the year 1975, and approved by all the countries of "OPEC" on the pricing of all its oil resources exclusively in U.S. dollars and receive dollars for oil. In return, they received promises of arms shipments and military protection.
petrodollar system that formed forty years ago is useful to Washington dually. First, banks receive "Federal Reserve" Mdjula of every dollar is issued (which, in the end, funds generate credit debt). So I took the banks reap huge profits; Also, some crumbs was going to "rabble" of Americans as well. Secondly, all transfers are made ​​in dollars through U.S. banks; As a result, Washington owns an effective mechanism to control the followers who make up a part of the global system of petrodollars.
Sometimes people say that America in the Middle East fighting for ongoing sources of oil for its economy. But with regard to the events surrounding Syria in 2013, this theory is correct, although it was still justified during the U.S. invasion of Iraq. In his memoirs, published in 2007, writes the head of the "Federal Reserve" the former Alan Greenspan: "It saddens me (!) That it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: The Iraq war is a war for oil primarily." In the same year admitted and current U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, who was a senator at the time: "People say that we are not fighting for oil. Of course we fight for oil. "
in the last few years, was America's energy problems solved effectively through the so-called "revolution sledge." Vaatmadha on external sources in the fall each year. America no longer try to install the systems under its control in the Arab world whose mission is to secure the oil and gas continuously to the United States. Today, form oil imports from North Africa and the Middle East, only 10% of the total oil consumption in the United States, and this number can be reduced in the next few years to zero. The Washington fights so that these resources are traded in U.S. dollars. As the masters of the "Federal Reserve" a direct interest in it. Now, for example, China is rapidly establishing strong ties with Iran, despite sanctions. What freaking Washington (or rather, the masters of "Federal Reserve") more than anything else is that the trade between these two countries are not in U.S. dollars, but on the basis of barter, clearing, and units of the national currency. No longer wanted one, willingly, in the trafficking of dollars in energy resources. Can not be imposed by force, but so far that are used against producers and exporters mainly.
raging conflict over the petro-dollar
Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran - these are links in the conflict and Washington to maintain the petro-dollar. Let us recall some facts semi-forgotten. In early 2011, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to start cooperation with Russia and China, where it is all exchanges oil in rubles and Iwan [Chinese currency]. In the March / March 2011, began the anti-government unrest and aiming to overthrow the existing regime, and in November 15 was a ban on Syrian oil exports. On June 1, 2012 has been a ban on the export of Iranian oil, which Tehran has started to sell the euro and the real, focusing on the internal exchange.
taking the situation is getting Sawa for the Masters, "the Fed." In early 2013 the dollar fell in global exchanges to below the psychologically important ratio of 50%. This was a sign of serious masters, "the Fed." Can other countries to join the "death list" of America. These countries are trading through: 1) barter; 2) clearing; 3) gold; 4) units of the national currency. For example, India and China to buy oil from Iran with gold. Washington does not have the ability to compel India and China to abandon this type of trade, but hopes to subdue Iran. It is also disturbing to Washington that Moscow is gaining increasing confidence in the use of the ruble in trade with neighboring countries. The Russia sign contracts with China increasingly rubles and Iwan. It also paves the Beijing commercial exchanges Balaewan up with Western European countries. Is not that reason enough to be considered and Washington, Russia and China have enemies? Therefore, the "Uncle Sam" is trying to make his way to the borders of Russia via Syria and Iran not only for geopolitical reasons, but purely for financial reasons as well. Both undermines the petrodollar system to be exposed to punishment!
when Washington attempts fail in maintaining the petrodollar system, will turn to the application of the "Plan B", also called "World War III". There are fuses this war in the Middle East, and more specifically in Syria and Iran.
Klchr Strategic Foundation - translation sentences

No comments:

Post a Comment