"I have not yet begun to fight!"

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976?Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Unless you are in this field of investigative journalism, especially covering extremely sensitive subjects and potentially dangerous subjects as well, you simply cannot understand the complexities and difficulties involved with this work that I face every day.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

pdate: Attorney Orly Taitz received a call from the U.S. Attorneys’ office stating that they are seeking another extension to answer to the Appellants’ brief in Grinols case

Posted on | December 9, 2013 | 18 Comments

Press release
Update: Attorney Orly Taitz received a call from the U.S. Attorneys’ office stating that they are seeking another extension to answer to the Appellants’ brief in Grinols case.
Attorney Orly Taitz responded to the Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward Olsen that she will be willing to stipulate to the extension, provided US Attorney Olsen fulfills his duty and forwards to the Federal Grand jury and criminal division of the US Attorneys’ office /Department of Justice all the pleadings and exhibits in Grinols et al v Electoral College, Congress, Obama et al for criminal investigation and prosecution of all the evidence showing Obama using a stolen Social security number and fabricated IDs.
Taitz reminded Olsen that during Watergate 3o high ranking officials of the U.S. government, including Attorney General of the United States John Mitchell, went to prison for their complicity in the cover up of fraud and obstruction of justice, that if Olsen does not forward the evidence he, as AG John Mitchell, might ultimately be prosecuted as an accomplice after the fact in Misprision of multiple felonies, in Obstruction of Justice and in a RICO to steal the franchise of the US president and wages of the U.S. President by one assenting his identity based on fraud and while using stolen and fabricated IDs. Taitz advised Olsen that she did not escape from the Communist dictatorship of the Soviet Union to see the same criminality here, that she is working pro bono and this is the matter of paramount importance for the country. Mr. Olsen responded that he knows how strongly Taitz feels about these issues. Taitz advised Olsen that her feelings are not important, that he is not requested to forward evidence because of her and her feelings, he has to do it to fulfill his duty based on his oath of office, it is his duty to this country. US Attorney Olsen asked Attorney Taitz to forward to him all the pertaining statutes for his review, which she did. Response from Mr. Olsen is due shortly.

from:		Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com>
to:		“Olsen, Edward (USACAE)” <edward.olsen@usdoj.gov>, Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com>
date:		Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:51 AM
subject:

Dear Mr. Olsen,

Per our conversation I am forwarding to you the pertaining statutes of the US code,

Please, see if you are not forwarding the evidence of forgery and fraud in Obama’s IDs to the Federal Grand Jury, you can be found criminally liable in misprision of all the felonies committed as well as being an accomplice after the fact to the cover up of all the stolen and fabricated IDs of Obama, in obstruction of Justice and complicity in the RICO to de facto steal the franchise of the U.S. Presidency by fraud and use of fabricated IDs.

· 18 USC § 4 – Misprision of felony | Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal …

www.law.cornell.edu › USC › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 1‎

18 USC § 4 – Misprision of felony

Current through Pub. L. 113-36. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

18 USC § 3332 – Powers and duties

Current through Pub. L. 113-36. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

(a) It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district. Such alleged offenses may be brought to the attention of the grand jury by the court or by any attorney appearing on behalf of the United States for the presentation of evidence. Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such attorney’s action or recommendation.

(b) Whenever the district court determines that the volume of business of the special grand jury exceeds the capacity of the grand jury to discharge its obligations, the district court may order an additional special grand jury for that district to be impaneled.