The 911 Truth Movement Goes to Court in the UK.
AE911Truth Evidence Goes to Court Feb 25, 2013
On February 25, in the small
town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and
potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement.
Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered
in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will
be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has
portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.
Over the last 16 months, BBC has
been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries
that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of
9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files:
9/11 Ten Years On’. Formal complaints were
lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries,
which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating
requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the
British public.
This document requires BBC to
show information that is both accurate and impartial. These complaints
were supported by the US-based educational charity Architects &
Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), which submitted detailed
scientific evidence to BBC to buttress the complaints. The evidence
focuses in particular on the confirmed free-fall of WTC 7 and NIST’s
2008 admission of this fact. In addition, over 300 AE911Truth petition
signers supported these complaints by sending letters to BBC, requesting
that BBC show this evidence to the public.
As a continuation of this process
with the BBC, documentary film maker Tony Rooke has decided to take a
personal stand on this issue. People in the United Kingdom are required
to pay an annual TV licence fee which is used to fund BBC’s operations.
Tony has refused to pay his TV licence fee on the basis of specific
anti-terrorism legislation.
Section 15 of the UK Terrorism Act 2000,
Article 3, states that it is offence to provide funds if there is a
reasonable cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the
purposes of terrorism. Tony’s claim is that BBC has withheld scientific
evidence which demonstrates that the official version of the
events of 9/11 is not possible and that BBC has actively attempted to
discredit those people attempting to bring this evidence to the public.
According to Rooke, by doing this, BBC is supporting a cover-up of the
true events of 9/11 and is therefore potentially supporting those
terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 who have
not yet been identified and held to account.
Rooke has been charged with a
crime for not paying his TV Licence Fee. However, he has lodged a legal
challenge to this charge and has now been successful in being granted an
appearance in a Magistrate’s court, where he has three hours available
to present his evidence to defend himself against the charge. Tony has
put together a formidable team to support him in presenting the
evidence, including the following two outstanding 9/11 researchers:
Professor Niels Harrit
P |
Dr. Niels Harrit is a Professor
of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen and is one of the world’s
leading experts on the scientific evidence that contradicts the official
story of 9/11. Professor Harrit’s team of scientists in Copenhagen
proved that there was nano-engineered thermitic residue, both ignited
and unignited, throughout the dust of the three WTC towers. He led the
team and published the peer-reviewed study in an official scientific journal. He is also an expert on the other aspects of scientific evidence indicating controlled demolition of the three towers.
Professor Harrit was interviewed for a major documentary with BBC in
2011 where BBC clearly attempted to harass and discredit him rather
than look at the scientific evidence, which was devastating to the
official story of the destruction of the Twin Towers. Professor Harrit’s
team took the precautionary step of recording this interview, as well
as the interaction before and after the interview, which clearly shows
the harassment and highly inappropriate conduct by BBC
Tony Farrell
Tony Farrell is a former Intelligence Analyst for the South
Yorkshire Police Department. He was fired in 2010 because he felt
compelled by his conscience to tell the truth in his official report and
state that, due to his extensive analysis of the events of 9/11 and the
7/7 London bombings, he considered that the greatest terrorist threat
to the public did not come from Islamic extremists but from internal
sources within the US and British establishment. He is now dedicating
his life to helping to expose the evidence and he is challenging his
dismissal through international court.
Other members of Rooke’s presentation team include:
Ian Henshall: Leading UK author on 9/11 and founder of the UK group ‘Re-investigate 9/11’
Ray Savage: Former counterterrorism officer who demonstrates the official 9/11 story is not true
Peter Drew: UK AE911Truth Action Group Facilitator
In addition to these presenters,
there are detailed written testimonies of evidence and support from four
other 9/11 researchers which will be deployed to bolster to Tony’s
defence:
Richard Gage, AIA: Founder/CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Dwain Deets: Former NASA Director of Aerospace Projects
Erik Lawyer: Founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
Jake Jacobs: Veteran US airline pilot and member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth
Dwain Deets: Former NASA Director of Aerospace Projects
Erik Lawyer: Founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
Jake Jacobs: Veteran US airline pilot and member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth
The evidence about 9/11 that will
be presented by the various individuals above has rarely, if ever, been
seen in any court of law in the United Kingdom, so this court case
represents a unique and valuable opportunity for the 9/11 Truth
movement.
We encourage all AE911Truth
supporters and petition signers in the UK to attend this court hearing –
the more the better. An outpouring of support will strengthen the
message that the 9/11 truth movement needs to be heard and that there
needs to be a new and independent 9/11 investigation.
The date and location of the hearing are as follows:
February 25th at 10:00 am
For further information, please contact Peter Drew, AE911Truth UK Action Group Leader, attruthfor911 [at] hotmail.co.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment