Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2012 Monty G. Marshall, Director Monty G. Marshall, Principal Investigator Societal-Systems Research Inc. Ted Robert Gurr, Founder University of Maryland (Emeritus) |
Brief Description:
The Polity conceptual scheme is unique in that it examines concomitant
qualities of democratic and autocratic authority in governing
institutions, rather than discreet and mutually exclusive forms of governance.
This perspective envisions a spectrum of governing authority that spans
from fully institutionalized autocracies through mixed, or incoherent,
authority regimes (termed "anocracies") to fully institutionalized
democracies. The "Polity Score" captures this regime authority
spectrum on a 21-point scale ranging from -10 (hereditary monarchy) to
+10 (consolidated democracy). The Polity scores can also be converted
to regime categories: we recommend a three-part categorization of "autocracies"
(-10 to -6), "anocracies" (-5 to +5 and the three special values:
-66, -77, and -88), and "democracies" (+6 to +10); see "Global
Trends in Governance, 1800-2012" above. The Polity scheme consists of
six component measures that record key qualities of executive recruitment,
constraints on executive authority, and political competition. It also
records changes in the institutionalized qualities of governing authority.
The Polity data include information only on the institutions of the central
government and on political groups acting, or reacting, within the scope
of that authority. It does not include consideration of groups and territories
that are actively removed from that authority (i.e., separatists or "fragments";
these are considered separate, though not independent, polities) or segments
of the population that are not yet effectively politicized in relation
to central state politics. The Polity project has evolved through three earlier research phases, all under the direction of Ted Gurr. The Polity III phase updated core Polity data through 1992 and was later updated through 1998 and released as the Polity98 version. Through its evolution, the format of the Polity data has been transformed from its original focus on "persistence and change" in the "polity" as the unit of analysis (i.e., polity-case format) to its present country-year case format, which is the preferred format for inclusion in time-series analyses. The original Polity I format was revisited by a research team under the direction of Nils Petter Gleditsch and information concerning the dates of polity changes was updated in 1994 and made available in the original polity-case format as Polity IIId. In the late 1990s, Polity became a core data project in the U.S. Government's State Failure Task Force global analysis project (since, renamed the Political Instability Task Force; PITF). The special focus on "state failure" problem events within a general context of societal and systemic development processes requires information pertinent to both Polity foci, that is, state continuity and change (country-year format) and regime persistence and change (polity-case format), be combined in a single data resource base. The fourth phase of the project, Polity IV, combines information from those two formats in a single data resource. Annual Polity IV records code the regime characteristics in effect on December 31 of the record year and provide the dates and magnitide of Polity changes that occurred during the record year. |
|||
The Polity
IV dataset covers all major, independent states in the global system
(i.e., states with total population of 500,000 or more in the most recent
year; currently 167 countries) over the period 1800-2012. With the
support of the PITF, the Polity IV Project has been transformed into
a living, data collection effort, meaning that it constantly
monitors regime changes in all major countries and provides annual assessments
of regime authority characteristics and regime changes and data updates.
It is also the most closely scrutinized data series on political issues
as analysts and experts in academia, policy, and the intelligence community
regularly examine and often challenge Polity codings. Monitoring real-time
events requires Polity analysts to make tentative assessments of the
trajectories of unfolding political dynamics and their effect on the
essential qualities of governing institutions, or patterns of authority.
Recent annual Polity records are routinely re-examined during each annual
update and may be revised in light of further information regarding
institutional practice. In addition, historical cases are often re-examined,
often as a result of questions raised by users and country experts,
and may be refined in conformance with new information or the correction
of errors in the records. Along with the annually updated version of
the Polity IV data series, we provide a separate record of substantive
changes made to the data records during the annual update procedure
(simple corrections are not reported). We also provide a separate version
of the dataset in "polity-case" format: Polity IVd. The standard
method for documentation of data collection in the social sciences,
that is, coding sheets, has been replaced by a more detailed description
of Polity characteristics and changes for each individual country in
the data series: the annual Polity IV Country Report series. We have
also compiled a list of non-constitutional changes in executive leadership
(e.g., coups d'etat, revolutions, or forced resignations) that may not
be captured in changed Polity scores or may result in only minor changes
of Polity scores. The Polity IV data resources and Country Report series
are now hosted on the Center for Systemic Peace Web site. Click on
any of the four graphs displayed in this section for a more detailed
explanation of the nuanced characteristics Polity data series
and its relationship to conflict management and the onset of political
instability. Click on the links below to access to the most recent version
of the Polity data series and country reports.
|
|||
Polity IV Individual Country Regime Trends, 1946-2010The "State Fragility Index" was developed by Monty G. Marshall at the Center for Systemic Peace and has been an annual feature in the Global Report series, click here to view the 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2011 Global Reports in the CSP Virtual Library. The 2011 Global Report was published in December 2011 by the Center for Systemic Peace; the State Fragility Index and Matrix is included in Global Report 2011, which can be viewed in PDF by clicking here. The most recent State Fragility Matrix (year 2012 data) is now available in PDF format by clicking here. The full, annual State Fragility data series (1995-2012) is available on the INSCR Data Page.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top of Page
* The research described in the Polity IV Project was sponsored by the Political Instability Task Force (PITF).
The PITF is funded by the Central Intelligence Agency. The views expressed herein are the author's/authors' alone and do not
represent the views of the US Government.
Last updated on June 10, 2013
Copyright 2005-2013
No comments:
Post a Comment