WOAI, San Antonio ^ | 8/12/2008 3:53 pm | Rob's No Bull Zone
Posted on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 10:11:33 AM by KayEyeDoubleDee
I have been reading for some time about Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate controversy. At first I dismissed it because I thought there was no way the Democratic Party would allow someone who is not qualified to run for the office of President.
I now understand that at least half of the state attorney generals in the country will challenge Obama’s residency before certifying his nomination. Lawsuits will be filed to clarify Obama’s birth in the United States.
Until today I simply believed that Obama was born in Hawaii. After doing some research I found it is not so clear cut. Obama may have been born in Canada or even Kenya. The birth certificate he has provided as proof of live birth is flawed. The first one his election team provided had no certification seal. The second had the seal and fold marks.
There is also a "Barrack Hussein Mohamed Obama" born on 23 August 1961 in Canada -- which is where people are saying Obama was really born -- not Hawaii.
The Kenya rumor is one I cannot find anything on. At the time of Obama’s birth, his pregnant mother would have had a hard time getting all the immunizations needed to enter Kenya. So I don't believe this rumor is valid.
I do believe the Obama campaign may have a big surprise come nomination day.
My question here in the "No Bull Zone" -- have any of you heard anything on this topic? As I have said, I am really not sure, but there is smoke surrounding this topic and the Obama campaign had been extremely secretive about this issue. Could he have been born in Canada? Is the Hawaii birth certificate real, even though but it has no seal or signature. What say you? I am on the fence on this one.
TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birth; birthcertificate; canada; certificate; certifigate; colb; colbaquiddic; obama; obamafamily; obamatruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-110 next last
WARNING: It is not clear to me what "Rob" has used as the source for this assertion. In fact, it is not clear just who "Rob" is himself; here is what WOAI has to say about him:
Now a Canadian birth, in August of 1961, is not at all out of the realm of the possible; remember, we know that Stanley Ann Dunham and the newborn Barry Jr had surfaced in Seattle, Washington, at the very beginning of 1962, already alone and abandoned by the birth father [presumably Barack Hussein Obama Sr]:
But Stanley Ann Dunham was only 18, not 23, when Barack Jr was born, and so, if it was a Canadian birth, then Barack Jr does not qualify for American birth citizenship, and is constitutionally ineligible to assume the presidency [unless maybe the birth was on "American soil", in Canada, such as on the grounds of the American embassy - do they deliver babies at the embassy?].
Rob is the blogger behind "Rob's No Bull Zone" on woai.com. All we know for sure about him is that he's United States Air Force Retired. Everything else is a mystery. http://www.woai.com/content/bios/story.aspx?content_id=6112cfe1-082f-4139-8824-f2e31be1c09bSo let's not get too excited about this little purported "factoid" just yet. On the other hand, are there any Freepers with Canadian genealogical and/or birth records experience who could shed some light on Rob's assertion?
Now a Canadian birth, in August of 1961, is not at all out of the realm of the possible; remember, we know that Stanley Ann Dunham and the newborn Barry Jr had surfaced in Seattle, Washington, at the very beginning of 1962, already alone and abandoned by the birth father [presumably Barack Hussein Obama Sr]:
Obama's mother known here as "uncommon"So it's not at all unthinkable that Stanley Ann Dunham could have gone "home" to the state of Washington, sometime in 1961, most likely to escape the embarrassment of having her friends at the University of Hawaii witness her developing out-of-wedlock pregnancy. Beyond that, it's not much more difficult to imagine that Stanley Ann Dunham might have wanted to cross over into Canada to give birth to her child:
By Jonathan Martin
Seattle Times staff reporter
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004334057_obama08m.html ...By 1962, Dunham had returned to Seattle as a single mother, enrolling in the UW for spring quarter and living in an apartment on Capitol Hill...
1) Stanley Ann knew that the child would be mulatto, which would have caused a fair amount of controversy in and of itself, and the miscegenation aspects of the child's conception might actually have been illegal in many American jurisdictions of the era. 2) Hers had been an adulterous union with the married Barack Hussein Obama Sr, who had a wife and a son back in Kenya.So a Canadian birth for Barack Hussein [Mohamed?] Obama Soetoro Dunham is not at all out of the realm of the possible. And for anyone who wonders about the importance of a Canadian birth: If one of the parents was a foreigner, and if the birth took place on foreign soil, then the child is not eligible for American birth citizenship unless the American birth parent had lived in the United States, as an American citizen, and AS AN ADULT, for five years.
3) The whole mess was further complicated by the question of whether the 24-year-old Barack Hussein Obama Sr might have committed statutory rape when he engaged in coitus with the [presumably] 17-year-old Stanley Ann Dunham, back in November of 1960.
But Stanley Ann Dunham was only 18, not 23, when Barack Jr was born, and so, if it was a Canadian birth, then Barack Jr does not qualify for American birth citizenship, and is constitutionally ineligible to assume the presidency [unless maybe the birth was on "American soil", in Canada, such as on the grounds of the American embassy - do they deliver babies at the embassy?].
No comments:
Post a Comment