Valerie “Jezebele” Jarrett Targets Hobby Lobby As A Corporate Entity Trying To Seize A Controlling Interest over Women’s Health
By: Fred Lucas
White House senior adviser Valerie
Jarrett called out Hobby Lobby and insisted the Obamacare mandate case
that will go before the Supreme Court is about whether big corporations
can restrict women from having access to birth control.
“No corporate entity should be in
position to limit women’s legal access to care, or to seize a
controlling interest over the health care choices of women,” Jarrett wrote on the White House blog. “To take that type of power away
from individuals, and to let the personal beliefs of a woman’s boss
dictate her health care choices would constitute a major step backward
for women’s health and self-determination.”
The case is actually a religious
freedom complaint against the administration for the Health and Human
Services mandate requiring insurance to
provide free coverage of abortion-inducing drugs, contraception and
sterilization. If the plaintiffs win, it would not allow them to
restrict employees from buying these products on their own, only that
the employees would not get them for free.
The high court will hear the case from
two family-owned companies, the Oklahoma-based chain Hobby Lobby and the
Pennsylvania-based Conestoga Wood Specialties Store Corp., both of
which argue that paying for employee-based coverage of these drug
violates their religious freedom.
“Today, there are people trying to take
this right away from women, by letting private, for-profit corporations
and employers make medical decisions for their employees, based on
their personal beliefs,” said Jarrett, whose blog was cross-posted on
the Huffington Post.
Jarrett predicted victory in the high court, and called out just one of the plaintiffs.
“Among the first cases to reach the
Supreme Court is one filed by Hobby Lobby, an arts and crafts chain
whose owners want to be able to take the option for birth control
benefits away from their employees,” Jarrett said.
Ed
Note: Apparently anyone who doesn’t want to murder children with Ms
Jarrett is a corporate entity trying to “Seize A Controlling Interest
over Women’s Health.” That’s the euphemism they are using now for
murdering babies. They call it “women’s health” That of course is an
oxymoron because women who have abortions have many more health problems
both physical and mental than women who don’t. Women who have
abortions also have a much higher substance abuse (both alcohol and
drug) problem than women who don’t murder their children.
The two litigants in the case are not
trying to restrict anyone’s freedom, said Sarah Torre, policy analyst
for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.
“This is an interesting argument from
the administration that pushed a health care law that severely
restrictions the ability for Americans to choose health care that aligns
with the value of their family and restricting companies that could be
creating jobs,” Torre told TheBlaze. “Obamacare is about restricting choices.”
“No one is suggesting a ban on
anything,” Torre continued. “This is about family businesses – the Green
family and the Hahns family – about their freedom to continue to
create jobs while respecting their values.”
The Green family is the owner of Hobby
Lobby. The Hahns family owns Conestoga Wood. Lower courts split on the
decision, ruling in favor of the Green family and against the Hahns
family.
No comments:
Post a Comment