Zullo Affidavit Roils AL Obama Eligibility Case – McInnish/Goode v Chapman

Posted by By GeorgeM at 16 May, at 15 : 31 PM Print

0

Some people have been confused by maneuvers on the AL case, which is currently on appeal to the AL Supreme Court.  Plaintiffs McInnish/Goode, via their attorney, Larry Klayman, are demanding that the Secretary of State vet all candidates on the AL 2012 Presidential election ballot. It’s the biggest game in Obama Eligibility Town right now, so everyone is watching it, commenting on it, so why not us, too?  Actually, we were asked to comment on it, by whom, we won’t say.

We reported on the Zullo affidavit recently and were wondering why new evidence was being submitted for an appeal, which isn’t usually permissible. Well, some of you may remember the Democrats’ recent submission of an “Obama” “birth certificate,” along with other falsehoods and nonsense. Since they did not attempt that before in the original case, it would seem that it was not admissible, since appeals are not supposed to accept new evidence. Since the judge hasn’t rejected it, Plaintiffs’ attorney Larry Klayman filed a motion to strike it and included a new, improved version of the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse (Arpaio) affidavit with it, signed by Chief Investigator Mike Zullo.  As I recall, older versions of the affidavit were supplied in the original lower court case. If the judge doesn’t strike the AL brief, then Klayman would have some justification to have his new brief added. This  would also be useful ammunition in a Supreme Court appeal, which is nearly inevitable regardless of who wins, although SCOTUS has had their head in the sand on this since day one.

Some people are also wondering why Arpaio/Zullo haven’t taken their case to prosecutors or AG, either, a question I often ponder myself. I have heard from three reliable sources that they discussed this with at least one prosecutor, not to mention multiple legislators and not found anyone who has acted yet.  He was told by a prosecutor that there wasn’t enough proof. Proof? Proof for what?  That the so-called birth certificate and Selective Service application are fraudulent is clear.  Who did it may not be so clear, although I am told that they can tell who probably put it on the White House web site. What may not be known is who authorized and knew about it. But regardless of who did it, the one who has most to gain or lose knew it was there, knew of the problems with it, even if he’s ducked dozens of court document services.  


I don’t know if the Cold Case Posse can go to Prosecutors out of their jurisdiction, or whether prosecutors can come to them for evidence.  I see that they are providing affidavits in multiple states and understand that Zullo will testify, if called.  

It is beyond bizarre that “Obama” forces have released three different “birth certificates,” just since April, 2011.  It is even more bizarre that media and nearly all politicians pretend not to notice it and that courts and “law enforcement”, except Joe Arpaio, have absolutely refused to do anything about it.

So, what we know is that documents were forged, others probably knew about them (Misprison of Felony), “Obama” must have known about it (Misprision of Felony, at a minimum), “Obama” hasn’t provided a shred of valid, legal proof that he is eligible, after multiple legal challenges, the latest “birth certificate” also appears to be a forgery and may be even further altered. Hecklers, get off Klayman’s and Zullo’s backs already and let them do their jobs.

““`
Motion to Strike AL Democratic Party Brief: http://www.scribd.com/doc/141962638/141777437-McInnish-v-Chapman-Motion-to-Strike-ADP-Amicus-Brief-Obama-ID-Fraud-AL-Supreme-Court-5-14-2013

Affidavit of Mike Zullo: http://www.scribd.com/doc/141966082/Zullo-Affidavit

This case is quite interesting. Read more
Other Alabama News 
Donate to Larry Klayman, attorney who is handling the case